Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Sportsfan 1234

Source 📝

48: 24: 34:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
31: 75: 78:
to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.
55:
several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
56: 67: 83: 63: 51:
Hi Sportsfan 1234! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
71: 79: 87: 52: 47: 23: 30:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
62:
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article
59:
disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
22: 38:
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
19:
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
32:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard 8: 7: 14: 70:. If you are unable to agree at 46: 1: 88:09:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 103: 76:dispute resolution options 74:, please use one of the 27: 26: 57:edit warring policy 28: 94: 66:to try to reach 50: 102: 101: 97: 96: 95: 93: 92: 91: 44: 21: 12: 11: 5: 100: 98: 43: 42:September 2024 40: 20: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 99: 90: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72:Talk:Buzz cut 69: 65: 60: 58: 54: 49: 41: 39: 36: 33: 25: 18: 16: 61: 45: 37: 29: 15: 64:talk pages 68:consensus 53:Buzz cut 80:Belbury 84:talk 86:) 82:(

Index


Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
Information icon
Buzz cut
edit warring policy
talk pages
consensus
Talk:Buzz cut
dispute resolution options
Belbury
talk
09:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.