90:. His edit summary says "What's sensory input?" The link turned out to be red because there is no article specifically on that. The link can be left there as an indication that at least one editor thinks there ought to be one, and as an impetus for someone to write an article, or a link to a specific part of another article could be created, or the link could be removed (simply by removing the pair of square brackets) if you think the phrase should be clear enough for the average reader. (There is one more problem with the phrase: it says "
399:
376:"consensus" as a vast majority (90%+) of individuals coming to the same decision independently (e.g. how we might talk about a scientific "consensus"), as opposed to consensus as compromise. I gather Knowledge (XXG) tends to use the term in the latter manner in which people with different opinions agree on some kind of middle ground that all can live with even if they find it imperfect?
231:
194:. I wonder if you could answer my question and, if you think it would help the average reader, perhaps add just a bit more so that it is really clear. Usually, I can understand things like this, but I just can't figure it out. (I didn't read the article on habituation all the way through. Maybe I need to do that.)
85:
Welcome, StoneProphet11! I've been looking for an editor knowledgeable in psychology for a while now to answer questions I have when I go over articles having to do with psychology. You might be able to answer a question posed in an edit summary by an editor who tried to create a link to a WP article
94:
sensory input", not just "sensory input", but since this is at the beginning of the article, nothing about sensory input has been mentioned yet. So at the very least, the word "the" should be removed.) The presence of that error right at the beginning of the article suggests to me that the article
375:
Hah, yes I am a psychologist. Ok, let me take a look and mull it over...actually, ok, took a look. Ok, I'm not remotely an expert on
Knowledge (XXG) policy, let me say. I think the difference in usage, which is probably not entirely clear in general usage either by the way...is the sense of
355:. Since you are a psychologist (I judged this by your edits, now I have read your bio-page), I have decided to ask you about this. It has to do with the very start of a certain attempt to make Knowledge (XXG) a better place. Maybe you wil find someone to love who is still alive after all!
415:
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
444:
190:
and just making minor copy-edits to improve clarity and conciseness along the way, and I have come across something that I just don't understand. I've posted a question on the article's talk page at
128:
Actually that initial line refers to perception, a type of cognition, not cognition as a whole, so I thought it best to remove and go with the next line which sounded a bit more on target.
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there!
191:
209:
Eesh that was an article both short and dense, but it basically says they demonstrate that infants have color vision much like adults at a younger age than previously expected.
95:
has not been gone over carefully in a while. If you feel like it, you can review it for accuracy. Only add new material if you have reliable sources to cite with it (see
187:
99:). If you have questions, you can start a new section on the article's talk page. I'll probably go over the article at some point, too, but with a different focus.
26:
255:
25:
319:
247:
447:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
315:
312:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
114:
Ok, just saw this, I'll try to take a peek soon. Cognition isn't my main area, but I'll see what I can see, as they say.
425:
48:
304:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
142:
You're the expert in psychology. That's why you're needed! Since you're new to WP, you might like to read
290:
55:
40:
364:
377:
210:
199:
161:
151:
129:
115:
104:
440:
44:
436:
429:
421:
417:
335:
286:
235:
66:
143:
405:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
260:
160:
In fairness, being a psychologist doesn't make me an expert in all areas of psychology. :)
242:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
146:, which tells what the lead (sometimes spelled lede) section of an article should contain.
468:
360:
96:
192:
Talk:Linguistic relativity and the color naming debate#Additional universalist arguments
278:
195:
147:
100:
398:
351:
There is a proposal at 5 pillars that I would appreciate your comments on. It's at:
326:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
331:
327:
309:
62:
352:
473:
452:
385:
368:
339:
305:
294:
277:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
218:
203:
169:
155:
137:
123:
108:
70:
87:
411:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
61:
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,
308:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
282:
270:
266:
251:
300:Disambiguation link notification for September 14
188:Linguistic relativity and the color naming debate
182:Linguistic relativity and the color naming debate
345:Your comments on WP:5P would be much appreciated
17:StoneProphet11, you are invited to the Teahouse
371:, last edited at 02:55, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge (XXG).
8:
435:For additional information, please see the
420:is in effect: any administrator may impose
432:, when making edits related to the topic.
248:Adolescent sexuality in the United States
424:on editors who do not strictly follow
86:for "sensory input" in the article on
7:
437:guidance on discretionary sanctions
14:
397:
229:
24:
367:) This posting first edited at
340:09:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
186:I've been reading the article
1:
386:14:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
369:02:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
53:
225:Reference Errors on 30 June
489:
474:15:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
430:page-specific restrictions
426:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies
353:Real world style consensus
22:
219:03:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
204:23:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
170:03:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
156:19:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
138:05:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
124:05:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
109:21:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
381:
295:00:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
283:report it to my operator
214:
165:
133:
119:
71:16:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
441:Arbitration Committee's
418:discretionary sanctions
240:automatically detected
328:opt-out instructions
49:I'm a Teahouse host
318:• Join us at the
56:Visit the Teahouse
465:
349:Hi Stone Prophet,
323:
264:
78:
77:
73:
480:
471:
466:
459:
401:
313:
258:
233:
232:
60:
58:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
488:
487:
483:
482:
481:
479:
478:
477:
469:
458:
453:
450:
449:
402:
394:
347:
320:DPL WikiProject
302:
230:
227:
184:
83:
74:
59:
54:
19:
12:
11:
5:
486:
484:
454:
403:
396:
395:
393:
390:
389:
388:
378:StoneProphet11
356:
350:
346:
343:
301:
298:
279:false positive
275:
274:
226:
223:
222:
221:
211:StoneProphet11
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
162:StoneProphet11
130:StoneProphet11
116:StoneProphet11
82:
79:
76:
75:
38:
35:StoneProphet11
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
485:
476:
475:
472:
467:
464:
463:
457:
448:
446:
442:
438:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
413:
412:
410:
400:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
370:
366:
362:
357:
354:
344:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
321:
317:
311:
307:
299:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
272:
268:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
241:
237:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
181:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
80:
72:
68:
64:
57:
52:
50:
46:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
461:
460:
455:
451:
434:
414:
408:
406:
404:
358:
348:
325:
310:No Good Deed
303:
287:ReferenceBot
276:
271:Ask for help
239:
236:ReferenceBot
228:
185:
91:
84:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
234:Hello, I'm
330:. Thanks,
306:Narcissism
285:. Thanks,
281:, you can
256:cite error
443:decision
428:, or any
422:sanctions
314:Read the
254:caused a
252:your edit
238:. I have
196:CorinneSD
148:CorinneSD
101:CorinneSD
88:Cognition
81:Cognition
439:and the
407:It does
361:Scott P.
359:Thanks,
45:Jtmorgan
332:DPL bot
246:On the
144:WP:LEAD
63:HostBot
250:page,
392:Alert
97:WP:RS
462:warm
445:here
382:talk
365:talk
336:talk
291:talk
261:help
215:talk
200:talk
166:talk
152:talk
134:talk
120:talk
105:talk
67:talk
409:not
316:FAQ
267:Fix
265:. (
92:the
33:Hi
384:)
338:)
293:)
269:|
217:)
202:)
168:)
154:)
136:)
122:)
107:)
69:)
51:)
470:♠
456:S
380:(
363:(
334:(
322:.
289:(
273:)
263:)
259:(
213:(
198:(
164:(
150:(
132:(
118:(
103:(
65:(
47:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
