User talk:Staecker/Archive 1

1768:, and I agree that something seems amiss with this thing. I first noticed that the article creator had put in a picture for Scoop, the Allen film opening this summer, and he has details from both films in the article. A search under the given title brings 0 ghits, and the information on IMDB for a projected 2007 Allen film does not match some of the info in the current article. Given all this, I am going to put the article up for AfD for highly inaccurate crystalballism and lack of references. --- 897: 31: 1593: 1181:. On the other hand, I think it's clear that Janna is a middle-schooler whom someone is making fun of and have tagged it as speedy. I know, it wasn't that big a deal that you reprodded it in this instance, but I just wanted to make sure you knew that you should almost never do that. (If someone blanks the page, I revert it, because blanking doesn't seem like an objection to deletion.) 1304:

PhDs) use informal speech in most of their discourse, spoken and written. I'm perfectly capable of formal and technical speech, which you can see if you read any of my technical writings (really I don't expect you to, but your whimsical references to my background suggest that you have), but I use it only when appropriate. See if you can detect my dry morphological violations at

1006: 857:

without permission from copyrighted websites. For that reason they would be in violation of wikipedia standards. If you can document that either you produced these images yourself (i.e. you actually took that photo with your camera), or that they have been released into the public domain by their copyright holders, then they would be acceptable.

1420:

just throw it out. You didn't get yours from a dumpster in Santa Monica, did you? I suspect it would be worth a fair amount if you had the remote, which controls the thing. I never did, so couldn't get it to do anything but give me a green screen and a startup chime (which was satisfying, though brief).

1419:

I got mine on eBay in 2001. I think I placed my bid on September 10 with a few days left, and then nobody outbid me. I got it for about $ 20, in the hopes of playing around with it and then selling it. I'm not sure how much they're worth now... in a tragically rushed move from coast to coast I had to

419:

Yeah, BS should redirect to Christianese, though that should probably be moved to something like 'Christian jargon'. Metaphoriacal language I dunno - if it were developed at all I would defend it against any claim of NOR, but as it is its fair game. Old stuff from like three years ago, IIRC. Regards,

322:

That doesn't make much sense to me. The text that you copied was (partially) biographical in nature. Are you suggesting that since Joyce Meyer is a Christian that she wants you to "adopt" her biography? That doesn't even make sense. The fact that the article is about Joyce Meyer does not mean that we

307:

A 'declaration of faith' or a 'statement of faith' published by a religious ministry is a public delcaration and is not copywrited. Think of it as a 'new release' because just like a news release it is an announcement to the world. Religious organizations hope, and even intend, that individuals and

1303:

Well, Papa, I think you've fairly summed up "informal speech" as contrasted to "technical speech" or "academic speech". The use of informal language serves to emphasise certain meanings, rather than detract from them. It shouldn't surprise you to know that native speakers of English (even those with

1110:

today, at my request. I'm not sure if it had the same name as the old (yet surely if it did, he wouldn't have been able to upload it without overwriting the old one, would he?) And then what happen? One of them got deleted? The other experienced a name change? I still see the new one on my userpages

757:

the trivia you added about the professor being fired for converting to roman catholicism bothers me. i know it was in the wsj, but the school does have professors of different denominations. though i may not know the whole story, i have heard that the layoff was for other reasons, and i would rather

1707:

page says that they're done with it. That makes me think that in their opinion the specific image tags do state rationale sufficiently. I'm not averse to adding in some more stuff about Yoda in that image, but I'm not sure what I would write. The resolution issue is addressed in the tag. Further, I

843:

I think you may be confused. I have two identical images. One is non pornographic and fits wikipedias standards while the other is not. The one which is pornographic may be deleted while the other one has proper copyright status and is relatively decent headshot. That is why I took the schedule for

438:

What's good!? I am sorry, misunderstanding. My cousin is using the Knowledge (XXG) under my name to edit his views about 50 Cent and G-Unit. Include that in the biography part! My cousin is a big fan of 50 Cent and he sometimes uses the Knowledge (XXG) site to edit under my name. Yeah, keep it good

1658:

Could you elaborate on this (or point me to a discussion)? Isn't the {{film-screenshot}} template enough to establish rationale? It states the reasons why we believe the fair use claim is justified. The {{norationale}} that you put specifies its use for images with the generic fair use tags, which

1270:

What I find in your writing can be summarised as "stylistical and morphological violations for the sake of consise laconical expression", i.e. you tend to express yourself in a dry, single-pattern, often morphologically incorrect form, that nevertheless retains the key meaning - which seems to be

1035:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases

816:

Hi, If you can please delete that image I would appreciate it. I dont know how to do it once its uploaded. I have two version of the picture, one pornographic and one non pornographic. Please delete the pornographic one. I uploaded the wrong version by accident instead of the edited non nude one.

615:

Wow- that's a pretty serious accusation. I'm not sure if there's anything I can say to convince you, but I think you've misinterpreted me on this one. I assume that you cite "religious reasons" because my userpage says that I'm a christian. I hope that didn't throw you- I certainly didn't mention

765:

I think I do mind. I read the WSJ article and it bothered me, which is why I put it in the article. I'm a faculty member at a Christian college myself, which is why the story was especially concerning to me (although I have no intentions of becoming a Catholic). I suggest that you post a note at

630:

The images I called UE are fairly obviously (although of course I couldn't prove it without more research) copyvios from other sites, tagged with the almost certainly inappropriate "CopyrightedFreeUse" tag. They deserve deletion for this alone (as I think you'd agree). As for my judgement of UE,

353:

You may not publish, modify, copy, distribute, sell, transfer, or reproduce in any way the material on this website without prior written permission from Joyce Meyer Ministries. You may not, without the permission of Joyce Meyer Ministries, mirror or frame any material which is contained on this

856:

Sorry for the confusion- As far as pornography goes, there are no "wikipedia standards". Nudity in general is not prohibited from Knowledge (XXG), and many images considered pornographic by some are acceptable here. My objection to your images (both of them) is that they seem to have been taken

770:

about the issue, and explain your reasons for the proposed removal. That way different people can state their views- so it won't just be you and me. My own opinion isn't any more authoratative than yours, but I think that removing the statement to improve Wheaton's image is a very bad

639:. Based on the fact that there was no latex in that particular image, I judged it UE for the apparently intended subject area. My own criteria for judging UE on an orphaned image is: if I can't think of an encyclopedic subject that this image illustrates, then it's UE. I suppose that 952:

Regarding your deletion of my addition, the discussion about the use of Omega Point in current Transhuman literature is an important addition to the issue of Omega points. It is also an important addition to the work of such theorists as Frank Tipler, who is quoted on this page.

351:, and is owned by Joyce Meyer Ministries. This information and or content includes, but is not limited to, graphics, images, photographs, audio clips, video clips, text, articles, and the Joyce Meyer Ministries Logo which is a registered trademark of Joyce Meyer Ministries. 774:

If you can give a (sourced) description of the "other reasons" that this guy was fired, then that would be a very good reason to change the article (though probably inserting your "other reasons" would be preferable to deleting the whole bit). Personally, I hope that there

1640:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1364:

description photofiles - perhaps they mistake. I think, we can some wait another opinion of users and remove images. And about copyrights - I scaning original photoprints this images in different museums of Ivanovo region (including museum of Tarkovsky in Yuryevets -

1399:

I've recently come into possession of a prototype Apple Interactive Television Box (which I identified with the help of your article--I previously thought it was a Pippin). How did you come into possession of yours? I'm considering selling mine--any tips? Thanks! —

1815:

Sorry- I meant to revert the anon's edit about interpretations of Leviticus, but I somehow reverted too much, and I guess I screwed up some other bits. Of course there's no interpretation issue in what you're talking about. Hope I didn't cause too much problems--

788:

i can only get word-of-mouth. the dean of natural and social sciences stated they don't believe this hurts the schools reputation, since it does want to maintain a protestant curriculum. the wsj article has stirred some controversy in the local area imo though.

1080:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 197:; currently there is only a stub for the latter (though confusingly of course the city is often called just "New York"). If you have any questions on particular cases, feel free to ask me or just err on the side of inclusion. Keep up the good work.-- 975:

would do better. The content you added seemed to be just a summary of that page. I was also a bit turned off by your using omegapoint.org as a source. This is certainly not a reliable source- see the section on Bulletin Boards at

544:

Please don't try this sort of thing. I note that you stated that images containing nudity (as well as one containing a photograph of a tattoo that states in the description it was taken by the user) were "unencyclopedic" (UE):

1708:

would say that if the tag really isn't providing sufficient rationale, then the tag should be changed, rather than manually adding rationale to what I assume is thousands of images with no rationale beyond the tagging.

1804:

What interpretation is there with which to differ? John Howard used his role as Prime Minister to overturn the ACT's Civil Union legislation. That's it. That's what happened. There are not civil unions in the ACT.

250:

which I read a long time ago, and doesn't have too much to say about the Noon Universe anyway). The books are very hard for me to find (I'm American and don't read Russian), so I'll be contributing as I'm able.

1277:

You should be able to inquire into things from multiple perspectives, otherwise you will fail in your communication efforts as others have all sorts of different perceptions that you won't be able to bridge...

720:

Sorry for perhaps over-reacting a bit, I can see I misunderstood your intentions now and thanks for explaining. had a recent bout of people attempting censorship on wikipedia (for example a recent one would be

792:

If you're actually there on campus (sounds like you are), maybe some kind of campus newspaper is printing some of this "word-of-mouth"? Then we could insert it into the article. If not, then it's no more than

1359:

Hi! About Image:Solyaris1.jpg and Image:Solyaris2.jpg... I think - You right - this images may be from Mirror film. But I'm not sure. All information in images description I take from museum of Tarkovsky in

1430:

I got mine from a friend who himself isn't quite sure where it originally came from, but he got it around 2001 or 2002 as well. I didn't get the remote for it and I haven't had a chance to hook it up yet. —

1266:

Mr. Staecker, I have no intention of attacking you, but I do believe that the English you write has a lot of improvements to de desired (that is not to say that my writing is approaching perfection - no).

356:

The unauthorized use of any of the material contained on this website may violate certain copyright laws, trademark laws, communications regulations and statutes, and laws concerning privacy and publicity.

1636:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

923:

to link to images rather than include them (by putting : before every image name), or delete it. I know this is annoying, but it's a pretty necessary part of Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy.

1778:

Ah, OK. The text was the same as at Scoop when I db'd it, but changed a few minutes later. After a totally empty google search, I'd assumed it was vandalism. We'll see what the AfD turns up.

1076:

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

830: 1274:

What you need to be able to do - is expand your linguistic topography: from minimum Nielsen units into dynamic systems that help you predict a range of shapes (and not a single value!!!)

1488:

article doesn't really clear this issue up, though, as I think it should. It should be explained that the film was written and directed by Tarkovsky and Guerra (see IMDB for details).

1236:? You don't actually study these, do you? I get a hankering for the subject every so often, but then I get back to work. I can't believe I remember those words. Good luck at Berkeley- 663:, and a few others. But all those pages seem to have adequate images. I called the others UE too, but I'll admit that what I said above doesn't apply to them all- so that's my mistake. 1567:. I didn't start a discussion because I think my edit summary sufficiently explained my reasons to remove, but I'd be happy to debate if you think it's warranted - I'm watching it. 829:

Thanks for the note- but I can't delete the image (neither can you) since only administrators can delete articles or images. You'll have to post your request at the listing over at

1721:

Alright then. Perhaps you should tell them to get rid of the note at the bottom of every fair use tag that asks for a detailed fair use rationale if they're clearly not needed. --

1704: 693:

Didn't mean to upset you- next time, I'd appreciate some warning (or inquiry) before you label me a Christian anti-nudity censorer. I am christian, but not those other things.

625:). I am quite familiar with Knowledge (XXG)'s censorship policy, and support it wholeheartedly. (I'll even leave the links you put on this page to allegedly offensive images.) 447:

Is that article in the biography section of 50 Cent? (There's a lot of vandals trying to revert and add rhetroic and (bias) comments to this article. It's getting real old!)

397:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 621:

I hope you'll believe me when I say that I didn't ifd that stuff because I thought it was offensive. My UE claim wasn't the main reason, either (except maybe for

1191:

OK- I thought it'd be ok since they clearly were just trying to keep their own nonsense from being deleted. I should've read the prod stuff more closely-

1563:(and I'm not sure how else I am meant to interpret it). Of course you're free to replace the information I removed if you like, or start a discussion at 698:

By the way, wouldn't it be better for you to respond to my UE claims on the ifd page, rather than deleting them? I'll put it back in a bit if you don't.

1506: 394: 560:: Knowledge (XXG) may contain content you find objectionable, but that does not give you a right to unilaterally remove everything that "offends" you. 1484:

Tarkovsky, in which case it should not be included. I've seen it now, and I suppose I've decided it was a real Tarkovsky film, so I'll put it in. The

1368:), but in musems description don't have information about photographers... P.S. How You think - may be some images of "Tarkovsky at work" features on 1249:, though I meant to get a round tuit :-) I should add those others to my to-do list, though I haven't really done much with any of them in two years. 1641: 1081: 1637: 1077: 496:

article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you.

1645: 1559:

I know it could, but only if one assumes bad faith. And I think you know that calling me a dolt in the edit summary could be interpreted as a

1039:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use

150: 1747: 1825:

No, there weren't any problems caused, and you inadvertently highlighted an issue I believe with the description of the topic in question!

688:. I really don't see where this one fits in. Honestly when I first saw it I expected it to be a userpage image, but it's not. So I said UE. 550: 531: 1138:. One was being used on your Moods page for great justice, and the other was beginning on your user talk page. I moved both zigs over to 1177:

Don't. Removing the prod tag is the correct way of objecting to the deletion. Prod is for uncontroversial deletions only. Please see

439:

with the article and make sure we keep those vandals from using it. Real and truthful. Good looking out and keep making good articles.

833:. Just add a note under my listing that says you are the uploader and you agree it should be deleted. That'll make things go faster. 336: 1699:

Thanks- but I still think the template is enough. It does specify that "web-resolution" is an important criterion. I looked over at

1700: 1070: 1066: 333: 722: 1765: 1518: 517: 510: 920: 124: 1676:

it states that GFDL is very strict on inclusion of copyrighted materials in articles, and that a full explanation is needed. {{

1440: 1409: 1111:(which is what I wish), but I note that the old one is still on Commons. You're not planning to delete the new image, are you? 1630: 556: 109: 915:

By definition, fair use images are only permitted for use on a particular page. You can not include them in user space (see

767: 551:

Knowledge (XXG) is not censored for the sake of any country's government, political group, religions, minors, nor anyone else

97: 1178: 1146:. I hope I did the right thing? I didn't realize that either one was on commons, but I'm not sure if it makes a difference. 143:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1060: 273: 159: 451:

Did you add the "politics" piece in the article on 50 Cent? Nothing personal, I think that doesn't apply to the article.

79: 71: 66: 129: 1294: 1703:, and saw that they were doing an image tag reform to (among other things) make the tags state rationale. And their 1680:}} isn't really enough, as if you were to use one with high enough resolution then it wouldn't be fair use. Reading 1480:

was really a Tarkovsky film (in which case it should be included), or if it was just some sort of "making of" film

582: 38: 1361: 1139: 1131: 1107: 972: 892: 727: 603: 104: 93: 1677: 669: 622: 1143: 1135: 640: 632: 136: 1622:

but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles constitutes fair use.

308:

other religious organizations would 'copy' (adopt) their declaration of faith. Despite that, the article is

1592: 1282: 140: 1027: 995: 231: 167: 1626: 1614: 1582: 1216:

Hi Kirsten- good to see you're still up to your old tricks. And you gave me some nostalgia reading up on

577: 144: 390: 379: 349:

All information and or content provided by Joyce Meyer Ministries website is protected by copyright laws

1619: 1054: 916: 323:

should copy material from her and her organization. What biographical article on Knowledge (XXG) obeys

119: 1788: 1769: 1514: 1342:

I know, quite the surprise. Hope you are doing good service on service day. (whatever that may mean)

425: 175: 1564: 1436: 1405: 928: 572: 286: 1233: 901: 1473: 1160: 1116: 962: 243: 100:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 47: 17: 1787:

Yes, that is what I am thinking at this point. Only one AfD response at this point, though. ---

1732:

Yes, that is a bit strange- and I didn't even see it until you mentioned it. I'll look into it.

1286: 279:

Thanks for removing the funny vandalism. I've added it to my user page as a badge of honor ;) —

1458:

should be under the "feature films" list. It is a 62-minute-long documentary made just before

174:, as one link per page is enough, according to the manual of style (see above). Enjoy editing! 1548:

Removing important information from articles like you did could be interpreted as vandalism. (

1305: 1250: 1207: 875: 332:

That's my personal disagreement with you. Now for some facts: The page from which you copied (

183: 1685: 879: 1751: 1549: 1369: 1127: 896: 648: 404:

Just hit it with a {{money}} fairuse template, which I didn't know about until now. Thanks-

1560: 672:. I don't find this image offensive in any way. There are much more illustrative images at 567: 262:

Anyway, it's still very nice to know that Strugatsky's books are read outside Russia. :) --

1673: 1510: 1343: 1324: 1290: 1182: 1085: 685: 527: 497: 421: 210: 977: 794: 189:

I appreciate your working on stub sorting, but please be aware of the difference between

1005: 1826: 1806: 1542: 1485: 1455: 1432: 1401: 1036:

link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

924: 847: 820: 636: 313: 281: 1688:

states the things that are normally included in rationales. Hope this explains. :-) --

1031:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1817: 1779: 1733: 1709: 1660: 1568: 1531: 1522: 1489: 1421: 1334: 1309: 1237: 1206:

Didn't expect to run into you here... are you going to write an article on snoc? ;-)

1192: 1156: 1147: 1112: 1043: 981: 938: 868: 858: 834: 798: 780: 739: 699: 479: 460: 405: 369: 295: 252: 218: 194: 114: 1829: 1820: 1809: 1791: 1782: 1772: 1754: 1736: 1725: 1722: 1712: 1692: 1689: 1669: 1663: 1652: 1649: 1571: 1552: 1534: 1492: 1466: 1444: 1424: 1413: 1389: 1378: 1366: 1346: 1337: 1327: 1312: 1253: 1246: 1240: 1225: 1217: 1210: 1195: 1185: 1163: 1150: 1119: 1088: 984: 965: 941: 931: 905: 861: 850: 837: 823: 801: 783: 742: 733: 702: 609: 534: 500: 463: 452: 440: 428: 408: 372: 316: 263: 235: 1221: 1130:

gallery. As I browsed, I get signal that there were two identical images called

1103: 198: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

711:

The IFD page isn't meant for discussion from what I know. but ok put them back.

1459: 1386: 1375: 1308:. On Knowledge (XXG) talk pages, people (not just me) are generally informal. 681: 521: 725:

where a guy is trying to censor even "obscene" bare arms from the article) --

1750:

has finally been created! If you're interested, please consider joining us.

1032: 246:(whose article I also started) is the only Noon book I've read (apart from 385: 1681: 1618:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 1463: 937:

Hey- you're right. I hadn't thought of that before. Thanks for the note-

883: 673: 652: 592: 520:? If you could add them in, it'd improve the article. Thanks in advance, 190: 171: 163: 758:

not have the school appear biased. would you mind its removal? thanks.

644: 587: 635:

which I then saw had been uploaded with some other stuff intended for

364:

Sounds pretty clear to me. (and I hope they'll forgive me for copying

312:

Joyce Meyers and therefore is attributed to her and her organization.

234:. :) Are you planning to write more areticles about Noon Universe? -- 217:

Sorry about that- serves me right for making lots of edits at once.

perhaps I was a bit hasty. The first one of these that I saw was

170:— so that it is more accurate. I also removed the second link to 1050: 660: 1179:

Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion#What this process is NOT for

1053:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read 516:

Howdy. Do you remember the references you used when you wrote

147:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 25: 831:

Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion/2006 January 15

738:

Thanks- and I'll check IFD policy before I make any changes.

668:

The one image I tagged which doesn't seem to be a copyvio is

956:

For this reason I am interested in reversing your delition.

844:

deletion off on the decent image and left it on the other.

684:

of the subject matter, and plenty of pot-culture images at

540:

Attempted censorship by you, possibly for religious reasons

459:

No I didn't. And I agree that it's a pretty weak section.

1705:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fair use/Fair use tag reform

971:

That's fine- but I think just a sentence with a link to

155:

before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

1476:

just like any other page. At the time, I was unsure if

1454:

Well, I do have an objection of sorts - I believe that

1099: 1073:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

327:

guideline? And there was no "attribution" of any kind.

1383:(Now this images removed to The Mirror (1975 film).) 882:

the user. I have speedied the mainspace article. -

1668:

Perhaps I could have used a better template then {{

1644:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1155:How are you gentlemen! Sounds cool, thank you. 1530:This comment retracted by Dat and replaced by 474:NO, the image shown is of the original novel, 1067:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags#Fair_use 395:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 8: 1766:An Excellent Picture of Yolanda (2007 film) 797:, which is not allowed on Knowledge (XXG). 389:An image or media file that you uploaded, 294:Right on- keep fighting the good fight. -- 135:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1271:sufficient as far as you see it/read it. 1245:Well, I wasn't even the one who started 919:). Thus, you should either change your 230:Thank you for writing the article about 1472:I'll add it in- or your can by editing 1142:, and marked to speedy take off every 563:Just a few of the many many examples: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 193:the U.S. state and its largest city, 162:. Note that there I made a link from 7: 1701:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fair use 1071:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 761:Sidmow 03:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 274:Alleged inconsistencies in Star Wars 1065:or one of the other tags listed at 105:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1674:Help:Image page#Fair use rationale 651:(yes, I've done my homework now), 557:Knowledge (XXG):Content disclaimer 96:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 24: 1764:I saw your db tag on the article 339:. I'll bold in the relevant bits: 158:Thanks for your contributions to 1659:this image doesn't use. Thanks- 1591: 1395:Apple Interactive Television Box 1004: 895: 616:religion in any of my afd notes. 518:Apple Interactive Television Box 511:Apple Interactive Television Box 29: 1587: 1000: 817:Thanks and sry for the mix up. 812:Image:Project-2 40.jpg deletion 723:Talk:Qur'an/Picture Controversy 1760:untitled 2007 Woody Allen Film 1646:Media copyright questions page 768:Talk:Wheaton College, Illinois 209:x is the link, y is the text. 1: 1232:meanings), to say nothing of 1164:22:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1151:16:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1126:First, someone set up us the 1120:15:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 1094:Zen mood image — what happen? 1089:14:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 1057:, and then use a tag such as 583:Category:Images of body parts 535:03:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 429:02:37, 12 November 2005 (UTC) 160:Lefschetz fixed-point theorem 1642:criteria for speedy deletion 1082:criteria for speedy deletion 985:13:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 966:03:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 942:13:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 932:23:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 906:14:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 862:21:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 851:20:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 838:04:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 824:04:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 802:20:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 784:04:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 643:could be used to illustrate 548:Please note, you are wrong. 501:22:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 464:12:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 409:21:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC) 382:has been listed for deletion 368:portion of their website) -- 125:How to write a great article 1102:is quite mysterious to me. 743:22:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 734:21:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 703:21:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 610:20:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 578:Commons:Category:Body parts 373:13:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 317:12:18, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 1848: 1830:20:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1627:the image description page 1379:08:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 1347:17:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1338:02:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1333:Fancy meeting you here... 1328:00:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1262:/* Friendly talk - Papa */ 1254:22:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 1241:21:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 1211:03:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 1140:Image:Zen Wikimood -02.png 1132:Image:Zen Wikimood -02.png 1108:Image:Zen Wikimood -02.png 1106:uploaded a new version of 670:Image:Cannabisleafback.jpg 623:Image:Cannabisleafback.jpg 1821:20:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1810:20:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1792:03:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1783:00:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1773:20:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1737:18:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1726:18:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1713:12:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1693:09:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1672:}}... but if you look at 1664:00:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1629:and edit it to include a 1362:Yuryevets, Ivanovo Oblast 1323:Dr. Staecker, I presume? 1313:13:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1196:17:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 1186:17:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 1144:Image:Zen Wikimood -2.png 1136:Image:Zen Wikimood -2.png 973:technological singularity 641:Image:Biancaprincess4.jpg 633:Image:Biancaprincess4.jpg 337:JM.org's Copyright Policy 290:30 June 2005 00:33 (UTC) 238:09:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) 213:21:26, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) 201:09:52, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 178:07:48, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) 145:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1755:21:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1748:WikiProject Central Asia 1653:22:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1572:18:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1553:16:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1535:22:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1493:13:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 1467:02:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 1049:to release it under the 917:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 573:Commons:Category:Breasts 298:30 June 2005 04:55 (UTC) 266:09:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) 255:23:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) 221:22:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1581:Fair use rationale for 1521:) . Section heading by 1445:20:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1425:19:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1414:17:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1390:12:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1028:Image:AbdirovStatue.jpg 996:Image:AbdirovStatue.jpg 1499:Constructive criticism 391:Image:200TengeNote.jpg 380:Image:200TengeNote.jpg 168:homology (mathematics) 1612:Thanks for uploading 1509:comment was added by 1025:Thanks for uploading 874:Well done for fixing 393:, has been listed at 92:Hello, Staecker, and 42:of past discussions. 1615:Image:HipHopYoda.jpg 1583:Image:HipHopYoda.jpg 1061:Non-free fair use in 729:Mistress Selina Kyle 605:Mistress Selina Kyle 568:Commons:Category:Sex 1565:Talk:Wizards (film) 1228:(I mean with their 1631:fair use rationale 1600:This media may be 1474:Template:Tarkovsky 1450:Tarkovsky template 1173:Restoring prod tag 1013:This media may be 244:The Time Wanderers 110:How to edit a page 98:your contributions 18:User talk:Staecker 1610: 1609: 1525: 1355:Tarkovsky at work 1306:fixed point index 1299: 1285:comment added by 1220:. But what about 1128:Special:Newimages 1023: 1022: 795:original research 401: 400: 205:Check your ] work 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1839: 1638:my contributions 1605: 1595: 1588: 1504: 1370:Andrei Tarkovsky 1298: 1279: 1078:my contributions 1064: 1048: 1042: 1018: 1008: 1001: 911:Fair use gallery 899: 887: 730: 649:Bianca Beauchamp 606: 386: 303:JM copyvio (not) 248:Hard to be a God 154: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1802: 1762: 1745: 1678:film-screenshot 1606: 1599: 1586: 1561:personal attack 1546: 1505:—The preceding 1503:dumb ogl scrub 1501: 1452: 1397: 1357: 1321: 1280: 1264: 1204: 1175: 1096: 1063:|article name}} 1058: 1046: 1040: 1019: 1012: 999: 950: 913: 894: 885: 872: 814: 779:other reasons- 755: 753:wheaton college 728: 686:cannabis (drug) 604: 542: 514: 509:References for 490: 476:Roadside picnic 472: 436: 417: 384: 305: 277: 228: 207: 187: 176:Oleg Alexandrov 148: 130:Manual of Style 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1845: 1843: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1761: 1758: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1716: 1715: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1608: 1607: 1598: 1596: 1585: 1579: 1577: 1575: 1574: 1545: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1486:Voyage in Time 1456:Voyage in Time 1451: 1448: 1428: 1427: 1396: 1393: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1095: 1092: 1021: 1020: 1011: 1009: 998: 994:Image Tagging 992: 990: 988: 987: 949: 946: 945: 944: 912: 909: 891: 871: 866: 865: 864: 841: 840: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 772: 754: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 715: 714: 713: 712: 706: 705: 695: 694: 690: 689: 665: 664: 637:Latex clothing 627: 626: 618: 617: 599: 598: 595: 590: 585: 580: 575: 570: 541: 538: 513: 507: 505: 492:Check out the 489: 484: 471: 468: 467: 466: 449: 448: 435: 434:Quick Question 432: 416: 413: 412: 411: 399: 398: 383: 377: 376: 375: 361: 360: 359: 358: 347:Restrictions: 341: 340: 329: 328: 304: 301: 300: 299: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 257: 256: 227: 224: 223: 222: 206: 203: 186: 180: 141:sign your name 133: 132: 127: 122: 117: 112: 107: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1844: 1831: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1799: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1759: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1648:. Thank you. 1647: 1643: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1628: 1625:Please go to 1623: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1603: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1584: 1580: 1578: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1544: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1449: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1426: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1354: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1261: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1172: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1084:. Thank you. 1083: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1062: 1056: 1052: 1045: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1016: 1010: 1007: 1003: 1002: 997: 993: 991: 986: 983: 979: 974: 970: 969: 968: 967: 964: 963:John D. Croft 960: 957: 954: 947: 943: 940: 936: 935: 934: 933: 930: 926: 922: 918: 910: 908: 907: 904: 903: 898: 893: 889: 881: 877: 870: 869:User:Synoptix 867: 863: 860: 855: 854: 853: 852: 849: 845: 839: 836: 832: 828: 827: 826: 825: 822: 818: 811: 803: 800: 796: 791: 790: 787: 786: 785: 782: 778: 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 759: 752: 744: 741: 737: 736: 735: 732: 731: 724: 719: 718: 717: 716: 710: 709: 708: 707: 704: 701: 697: 696: 692: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 629: 628: 624: 620: 619: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 607: 597:And many more 596: 594: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 565: 564: 561: 559: 558: 553: 552: 546: 539: 537: 536: 533: 529: 525: 524: 519: 512: 508: 506: 503: 502: 499: 495: 488: 485: 483: 481: 477: 469: 465: 462: 458: 457: 456: 454: 446: 445: 444: 442: 433: 431: 430: 427: 423: 414: 410: 407: 403: 402: 396: 392: 388: 387: 381: 378: 374: 371: 367: 363: 362: 357: 355: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 331: 330: 326: 321: 320: 319: 318: 315: 311: 302: 297: 293: 292: 291: 289: 288: 284: 283: 275: 272: 265: 261: 260: 259: 258: 254: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 237: 233: 225: 220: 216: 215: 214: 212: 204: 202: 200: 196: 195:New York City 192: 185: 181: 179: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 156: 152: 146: 142: 138: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 102: 101: 99: 95: 90: 89: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1803: 1763: 1746: 1743:Central Asia 1723:Lord Deskana 1690:Lord Deskana 1650:Lord Deskana 1635: 1624: 1613: 1611: 1601: 1576: 1547: 1529: 1502: 1481: 1477: 1453: 1429: 1398: 1385: 1382: 1374: 1358: 1322: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1251:Catamorphism 1247:catamorphism 1234:mutumorphism 1229: 1226:hylomorphism 1218:catamorphism 1208:Catamorphism 1205: 1176: 1097: 1075: 1038: 1026: 1024: 1014: 989: 961: 958: 955: 951: 914: 900: 873: 846: 842: 819: 815: 776: 760: 756: 726: 602: 600: 562: 555: 549: 547: 543: 522: 515: 504: 491: 475: 473: 450: 437: 418: 365: 352: 348: 346: 324: 309: 306: 285: 280: 278: 247: 229: 208: 188: 157: 134: 91: 87: 86: 60: 43: 37: 1752:Aelfthrytha 1550:Ibaranoff24 1281:—Preceding 1222:anamorphism 1104:User:Geogre 1098:I'm sorry, 948:Omega Point 554:. See also 36:This is an 1511:Dat1337vet 1460:Nostalghia 1433:Phil Welch 1402:Phil Welch 1372:wikipage? 1344:Lesliestng 1325:Lesliestng 1202:*waves hi* 1183:NickelShoe 682:human back 601:Thanks, -- 498:Scifiintel 478:. Thanks. 415:Biblespeak 211:Mirror Vax 182:Using the 137:Wikipedian 115:Help pages 1827:Enzedbrit 1807:Enzedbrit 1033:copyright 925:Superm401 888:you know? 884:Just zis 848:JJstroker 821:JJstroker 314:KeyStroke 242:Actually 226:Thank you 139:! Please 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 1818:Staecker 1780:Staecker 1734:Staecker 1710:Staecker 1682:Fair use 1661:Staecker 1620:fair use 1569:Staecker 1532:Staecker 1523:Staecker 1519:contribs 1507:unsigned 1490:Staecker 1422:Staecker 1335:Staecker 1310:Staecker 1295:contribs 1283:unsigned 1238:Staecker 1193:Staecker 1157:Bishonen 1148:Staecker 1113:Bishonen 1055:fair use 982:Staecker 959:Regards 939:Staecker 878:without 876:Synoptix 859:Staecker 835:Staecker 799:Staecker 781:Staecker 740:Staecker 700:Staecker 674:cannabis 653:princess 593:Clitoris 480:Attilios 461:Staecker 406:Staecker 370:Staecker 354:website. 296:Staecker 253:Staecker 219:Staecker 191:New York 184:NYC-stub 172:homology 164:homology 120:Tutorial 88:Welcome! 1800:The ACT 1789:Charles 1770:Charles 1686:WP:FAIR 1602:deleted 1543:Wizards 1319:hmmm... 1069:. See 1015:deleted 921:gallery 771:reason. 645:breasts 588:Breasts 470:Stalker 453:LILVOKA 441:LILVOKA 264:Koveras 236:Koveras 94:welcome 39:archive 1478:Voyage 1224:, and 880:biting 680:, and 532:popups 232:Ludens 199:Pharos 151:helpme 1482:about 1387:IPAAT 1376:IPAAT 1287:papa7 978:WP:RS 678:tatoo 657:tiara 523:Lupin 494:Jesus 487:Jesus 310:about 287:Welch 16:< 1684:and 1515:talk 1291:talk 1230:real 1134:and 1100:this 1086:Stan 1051:GFDL 1044:GFDL 929:Talk 902:AfD? 886:Guy, 777:were 661:pink 528:talk 366:that 325:that 282:Phil 1670:nrd 1464:Esn 1439:) ( 1408:) ( 1161:ノート 1117:ノート 426:eve 166:to 1633:. 1555:) 1517:• 1462:. 1443:) 1412:) 1297:) 1293:• 1159:| 1122:. 1115:| 1059:{{ 1047:}} 1041:{{ 980:. 927:- 676:, 659:, 655:, 647:, 482:- 455:. 443:. 422:St 251:-- 153:}} 149:{{ 76:→ 1604:. 1513:( 1441:c 1437:t 1435:( 1410:c 1406:t 1404:( 1289:( 1166:. 1017:. 890:/ 530:| 526:| 424:| 420:- 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index