44:
70:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
74:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
67:
24:
seems to have removed speedy again. I welcomed this user and am prepared to communicate again with him again, not sure whether to leave it a bit and either re-speedy or VfD later.
56:
51:
35:
84:
60:
80:
17:
21:
76:
25:
20:, must agree, sounds nonsense/vanity at best, the links seem to go to cat places,
28:
68:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Elephant's foot umbrella stand
16:
Hi, noticed your (speedy restored - fictitious nonsense) on
49:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
55:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
33:
8:
7:
57:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
14:
66:The article will be discussed at
42:
52:Elephant's foot umbrella stand
36:Elephant's foot umbrella stand
1:
29:12:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
100:
85:09:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
59:or whether it should be
18:Michael Rafn Dahm
91:
46:
45:
99:
98:
94:
93:
92:
90:
89:
88:
47:
43:
40:
12:
11:
5:
97:
95:
41:
39:
34:Nomination of
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
96:
87:
86:
82:
78:
72:
69:
64:
62:
58:
54:
53:
37:
31:
30:
27:
23:
19:
77:Lord Belbury
73:
65:
50:
48:
38:for deletion
22:User:Dhaerow
15:
61:deleted
81:talk
26:Alf
83:)
63:.
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.