User talk:Steven Walling/Archive 9

1299: 1244:. When I read the article, I actually didn't think it read like a "star struck adoration," but if you point me to passages where the language is a problem, I'd be happy to give them a copy edit from my non-fan perspective. I do assure you that I'm not a Murphy fangirl ;) I also have fixed a lot of the sourcing. Please let me know what else I can do to help get this over the line. I'm not quite as attached to the article as its nominator (or as exhausted from looking at it for weeks), so hopefully I can help us find the middle ground. Thanks for your patience. Cheers! -- 1263: 1840: 1013: 31: 810: 668:. I deleted it as soon as I saw it. Also, the info that was moved was not limited to that section alone though. He also copied the "Kafir women" section and others... I'm gonna start pressing on him there -- just wanted to let you know cause this might turn into a similar issue as before. Only difference: as far as I can tell, the rest of the article (minus his/her changes) is fine. 2341: 479: 171:

series of paintings spanning practically a whole decade. . ." Then, I see you asking me to remove many images and have even removed one yourself that I believe are important. I think the article would optimally have about 35 images in the gallery including all 25 1890 harvest images and all 5 1888 harvest images. Note the

2465: 2434: 2250:

Thanks for voting in my Rfa, which I withdrew from yesterday. Though I did not get promoted, I see this Rfa as being a success nonetheless. What I got out of this Rfa will help me to be a better, all around editor. Because of this Rfa I have decided to become better in other areas of editing. I'm not

2044:

article. Although you addressed the issue with the synopsis in the context of the GA review, your suggestion has left me with a question still, so I wondered if you'd be able to point me in the right direction? You wrote that you'd prefer to see citations for synopses, but recognised that the project

155:

Several reasons: 1. I do a better job of reviewing subjects I am interested in or have some prior knowledge. 2. I figured that since you made your request, someone had or will shortly take it up. 3. I usually only take up reviews for backlog reasons when they appear in the backlog template, since if

2320:

I removed the see also links you inserted. While I think you inserted them in good faith, there's no connection between Craig and Curtis at all, other than that they're both involved in sex scandals - and we don't "see also" list everyone who's ever been in one. The article's in the category for sex

963:

Ack, got tangled in a ton of edit conflicts. Only completed processes are added to the template; if it's on hold, it's not failed, and shouldn't be added at all. Only failed or listed are added; right now, it's showing as failed. Is that what you intend, or is it on hold? If you're going to do a

891:

It does not look right to me to emphasize on the wooden bowl in another image. - The wooden bowl is already shown in the Japanese equipment image. - Wooden bowl is nothing special between all types of equipments - Chinese / Korean / Japanese are more or less the same. - The key difference to mention

170:

I am having a problem with your review. The third sentence of the article says. "The title refers primarily to a twenty-five canvas series (Wildenstein Index Number 1266-1290) begun in the summer of 1890, using that year's grain harvest.". Then, in section three of your review you say ". . . for a

2090:

I just want to say thanks again for the review. I really am sorry if you were offended by my overeagerness. I'd been having a bit of a rough day, and we'd been working on the article together for going on a couple months. It all built up, and I guess you had to pay for it. It was probably a bit out

2070:

might need a cite, but rather, suppose we've got an air-tight, painfully objective, non-interpretive description for our summary of the events of the play (or novel or whatever): and you wanted to provide a citation for that, in deference to the most minute guidelines, etc. What would you cite? Are

756:

Yes, Yomangani is gone; he never clearly stated why, but I've got my ideas. Several of us split up his 30-plus featured articles and lists to add them to our watchlists so they won't deteriorate. I took Beagle and Laika and a few others, but I'm not a Beagle or Laika expert. I know there's a big

636:

Please take another look if you would. I've made changes to the article to address some of your concerns. Another user, who has well over a dozen FAs to his credit, so would presumably know a bit about what makes articles good, also did some work and gave his views. Thanks. I still feel it will not

2281:

Thank you for your recent comments and vote at my Request for Adminship. It was not successful. I don't believe this is unfortunate as it leaves me with much to ponder and a fresh slate from which I can better myself as an editor in order to be more compliant with the policies that are expected by

871:

Just mentioning this here because, well, I don't think it's sensible to expect you to watch the Peer review page in the hope I'll reply. I've tried to punch up the lead a bit and I think it's a bit more exciting now. I'm not sure about the popular culture section myself - it only appeared a couple

175:

says "The series is known for its thematic use of repetition to show differences in perception of light across various times of day, seasons, and types of weather." Remvoing images makes the juxtapposition unclear. For example, the image you removed is quite important in contrast to the adjacent

2116:

Sorry I didn't get back to you before, but thanks for getting the review done. I know most of the articles put up for GA are bad. I think I've done 5-7 reviews and failed everyone, most quick fail. To avoid that with articles I nominate I have Katr67 copyedit them first and give feedback. As to a

573:

Sir, I see you are very strong in your convictions. If you honestly believe I am a vandal, then explain to me the precise nature of my vandalism instead of leaving harsh comments on my talk page. To date, I have not said a single unkind thing to you or any other user and yet you persist in being

2059:

Thanks for your response. Sorry if it seems like I'm pressing a point--not for an argument, truly, but to understand your position. I do follow you in the distinction between description and interpretation; though there aren't really objective criteria upon which we might draw the line, since a

2365:

The current queue for sportspersons is about 5 weeks and the election is 3 days away. The time sensitive information will be cleared up by the time the article is going to be seriously evaluated. If you like I will wait until after next Tuesday's election, but was anxious to get this in the

2223:

article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very

682:

Sir, relating to my edits from the other day that seemed to cause you dissatisfaction, I would just like to express my regret that these have caused you grief. I sensed a degree of cynicism in your reply to me. I feel further remorse to have elicited such a negative reaction. As a token of my

544:

Sir, I take exception to your suggestion that my good faith edits are vandalism. Troll my user page if it pleases you, but do not presume to sully my good name with such slurs. I offer you no harm nor inconvenience, and yet, you have taken it upon yourself to scold me like a small child for

921:

Of course I know Bush hasn't directly amended the text of the constitution, he just ignored it with the Patriot Act (which is what is pointed by the user box) and overturned constitutional rights. There is at least one decision where federal courts declared parts of the act uncostitutional

360:

Were you to read edits before reverting them, you would notice that no information was deleted, only consolidated and made more precise. Your comment that Asana is a promotional catalogue for Yoga is absurd. The simple fact is that it a poorly written, misinformed and agenda-driven

898:

The reason I change the original image is that it is NOT showing a hollow+flat stone. It is not a Yunzi (maybe a very special variation produced by the Yunzi factory, in fact I own one myself but I do not like it). Putting it here is not a good representation of the topic.

964:

lot of these, you should get Dr pda's article history script, so you can get the oldids, etc. The old events like peer reviews and AFDs have to be added in order. If it's on hold, you should delete event3 and leave current status blank so it doesn't show as failed. Best,

737:

since Yomangani's gone? I'm watching five of his articles to make sure they don't deteriorate, but I don't know much about beagles. Someone just made a lot of edits, and I restored most to Yomangani's version, since I know how careful he was about the caps issue.

757:

deal about capitalization of species, and I've followed those debates, so when someone changed all the caps, I changed them back. And I know Yomangani was careful to set up the section headings in a way that wouldn't be a POV magnet, so I also changed them back.

948:

is the version that needs to be sourced. If you look at it, it may change your mind on the AFD. What has happened here is that Merle (and/or someone sympathetic to him) is trying to cover up some of the dumber things he has done in the past.

368:

You seem to take both yourself and Knowledge (XXG) very seriously. Do you want to be associated with an article on philosphy that spells it filosofy...or misrepresents the names and applications of postures so completely? I'd think not.

2091:

of line, and I think what I wrote came off worse than I intended. I meant it to be a kind of friendly nudge. Anyway, thanks for helping with the process and feel free to continue to comment anytime, of course. It's wikipedia, after all.

1757:

Thanks VT! I'm playing catch-up trying to get interviews I transcribed posted; I'm only about five behind now. Glad you liked it. Some Spanish magazine is going to translate it and publish it, so that's good news for Wikinews. Dave

902:

Lastly, the image does not violates any copyright rules here. I just link this to the original image shown in the Chinese version, it which it says explicitly that the photo is taken by the author whom does give up the copyright of it.

1779:

Thanks for taking the Hamlet review! I was wondering if you could do it soon. We're aiming for FA, and are eager to move through the Ga process to pick up loose ends on the way to FA. Thanks again! Usually you have to wait for weeks.

1627:

I have added some lines and citations in the alternative treatmens section on tai chi, yoga and exercise following your advise. I have also nominated the article as FA. If you feel is good enough you will be welcomed to vote it.

1486:

I'm really sorry, I was kind of worked up. I am finding it difficult to understand all of Lara's arguments but I don't want to inflame the situation. Struck and revised. Thanks. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 06:43, 28 September 2007

591:

You're wasting your time. You've already vandalized after your 4th warning, so you're toast. And don't act coy, adding a picture of a porn shop to a church article isn't helpful, and neither were any of your other edits.

545:

endeavoring to contribute to the body of human knowledge in no different manner than yourself. I disagree with you sir, but I would dearly advocate for your right to say it were the tables reversed. Respectfully yours,

697:

Hi, VanTucky; just a note, because it doesn't seem like the GA Project informs editors passing GAs how to update article history, so they frequently show up in the error category. When you pass a GA and update the

2449:, which passed with 54 supports, 2 opposes and 3 neutrals. Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it. I hope to exceed expectations, If you have any advice please feel free to let me know. Thanks again!. -- 2202: 2066:, the synopsis went through a long process of just that kind, to banish every instance that wasn't absolutely factual and supported by the text, as much as we could hope to.) But my question wasn't so much about 2049:, what kind of thing would you expect to see cited? Maybe I'm just being a little slow... could you point me to an example or indicate what kind of work you would have cited if you had written it? Many thanks, 304:

falsely indicated a redundancy in grammatical construction. However, the addition is important because it establishes the point that the very existence of the phenomenon has no basis in scientific consensus.

1929: 1147: 1094: 1941: 1924: 1900: 1159: 1142: 2197: 1936: 1154: 1111: 1118: 1074: 2071:

you thinking of a note that points to the relevant part of the original work? Or are you saying that we'd have to go, say, to the Cliff Notes, look at its copyrighted summary, compare and cite

1917: 1130: 1082: 1905: 1087: 1442:

My point was to inform you that it was rude. You could think about it, then apologize. I have seen this happening before. For example, there was the following dialogue on the talk page of

1099: 2284:

If you feel that there is anything that was not covered by the RfA that I need improvement in, I would implore your input and feedback as I hope and intend to improve as best I'm guided.

320: 1135: 1506:

I just read your latest comment. I'm glad you're not mad at me, but saying that you don't want to hear what I have to say and that my opinion is superfluous makes it look like you are.

1106: 442: 1971: 1912: 1189: 1123: 2225: 2117:

heads up, I'll see, though I have a general aversion to preferential treatment, it just looks kinda bad. Also, thanks for the vandalism barnstar, and watch out for the Zorcons!

156:

I'm going to expend my energies on subjects which I would not normally review for reasons of clearing the backlog, it's only logical to start with the most dire areas of need.

708:

template, if you scroll to the bottom of the talk page, the error category will be highlighted in red if the articlehistory is incomplete. I fixed and removed the errors at

2446: 1311:

This is a much better article now than if you'd passed it when I first thought you should have. Thanks for your high standards, and thanks for the image reorganization. ++

1529: 1361:

apparingly seems not to be that happy about the page protection. I am monitoring the article, in any case. Feel free to ask me for any kind of help in case you need. --

2011: 1219: 1533: 319:

Thanks for the deletion nom on Hindukush Kafir people! It was sorely needed! Interestingly enough, Sze_cavalry01 has already started offering up personal attacks on

1240:

Hi VanTucky, for some reason I've decided to help on the Cillian Murphy FAC. Regarding the blue eyes, I'd ask you to consider the evidence from my research here:

815: 1975: 1193: 1298: 1540:. After reading that, I'm sure that I won't have to tell you to watch for it being put up for deletion again, if this deletion review doesn't come out as 2060:

report by its nature selects and that selection involves interpretation of a kind; but there's probably a common-sense, consensus approach to that. (Re:

1967: 1963: 1185: 1181: 1602:

Well, I'm glad you took the time to cite policy instead of send me to AN/I or something. Haha. If you need your coffee warmed feel free to stop by.

1883: 1382:

of the article in response to the points you made – let's continue this discussion there. Can I persuade you to reconsider your decision? Cheers,

1056: 1386: 1665: 1646:, copied it for discussion. Sounds extremely interesting but I cannot find any sources that Catahoulas are in South America. No need to reply. 787:, and he appears to be edit warring with a floating ISP, who is actually making some sincere difference in the article. D7 is way past 3RR. -- 1353:

I am the admin who protected the article. As you are the user who asked for fully protecting it, I'd suggest you to discuss the issue on

2251:

going to just be a vandalfighter. Though vandalfighting is good, being active in all areas of editing is even better. Have a nice day.--

97: 89: 84: 1262: 2405: 2376: 2155: 1379: 845: 214: 186: 136: 72: 67: 59: 286:

Randi demonstrated that magic tricks can be used to do many things reported as psychic phenomena. There's nothing non-NPOV about it.

1958: 1176: 1337:

article due to being uncited and having POV issues was returned by its author. Looks like we need to address this user about this.

2409: 2380: 2159: 849: 520: 489: 455: 218: 190: 140: 2413: 2384: 2163: 892:

is that there are 2 species of Go stones - both side hollow and one hollow and one flat (the most representative on is Yunzi).

853: 222: 194: 144: 801:

Thanks for your interactive efforts in the review process and your editorial tweaks. You may want to display this somewhere.

683:

sincerity, please note that I have refrained from further controversial edits so as not to offend. Thank you for being you.

176:

image. I think you are missing several point. I have never done this, but do you think I could request another reviewer?--

1839: 1371: 1012: 448:

Thank you for reviewing it. We've addressed all of your suggestions. Feel free to review it again whenever you're ready. --

618:

Please see same, where I have replied. I think summary failure is unwarranted, and a hold would be a better approach. ++

612: 1585:

You know I was just giving you grief. I actually thought the addition was funny, but it of course OR :) Or is it....?

1548: 38: 825: 1320: 982:

ah, caught up, read the talk page, see it was previously failed, so it looks good now, should be all set. Best,

646: 627: 418: 664:

has moved the info that was in the "Kafir Characteristics" section of "Hindukush Kafir people" to the article,

47: 17: 1463:

I think that saying that her English is terrible was rude and unnecessary. A.Z. 06:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

2229: 1279: 702: 1567:

Man, the deletionist in you really is quick with that undo button. Have you ever been on a space station!?

2401: 2372: 2293: 2151: 1664:. He's a pretty famous dude but given his surname is offensive in its entirety, shouldn't someone contact 1608: 1591: 1573: 990: 972: 841: 765: 746: 723: 709: 210: 182: 132: 907: 405:

yeah, I do know about the signature, but I forgot that one time. Sorry, and thanks for the other tips. --

380: 370: 2139: 1643: 1354: 684: 575: 546: 306: 287: 1981: 1199: 2453: 2288: 2076: 2050: 1726:

Hey, thanks for all your help. When you get the chance do you think you could look at my question at

515: 484: 450: 2287:

All the best in your own endeavours in the real world, and also when you're not on Knowledge (XXG).

939: 733:

No problem, I make the same mistake often, so I check the error category :-) Hey, are you watching

204:

It seems you have not been on WP much of the day. I have asked for a 2nd opinion on the GAC page.--

2224:

grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at

1763: 1740: 1537: 1241: 788: 406: 2206: 2205:

are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue.

1362: 1358: 872:

hours ago - so I've added a request that reviewers give their opinion on it in the peer review.

661: 1536:. I felt that you may want to lend your voice about this topic in its deletion review as well. 1507: 1426: 1413: 1400: 2396: 2367: 2146: 1603: 1586: 1568: 983: 965: 878: 836: 820: 758: 739: 716: 205: 177: 127: 123: 111: 1985: 1203: 525: 494: 460: 172: 2118: 1347: 665: 345: 329: 119: 2418: 2389: 2352: 2325: 2298: 2255: 2240: 2209: 2188: 2182: 2168: 2132: 2121: 2105: 2095: 2079: 2053: 2021: 1817: 1808: 1799: 1784: 1769: 1747: 1713: 1684: 1650: 1632: 1614: 1597: 1579: 1510: 1429: 1416: 1403: 1365: 1341: 1323: 1248: 1229: 994: 976: 953: 933: 926:). So, at least one court has reverted part of his edits (vandalisms?), which is good. ;-) 881: 858: 791: 769: 750: 727: 687: 672: 649: 630: 601: 578: 564: 549: 531: 500: 466: 436: 409: 400: 383: 373: 350: 334: 309: 290: 276: 256: 246: 227: 199: 165: 149: 923: 864: 2017:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 1378:

Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the above article. I've posted a message in the

1283: 1225:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 509:, you're right; "yanki" is just the Latin American way of spelling "yankee". Please read 2358: 2322: 2270: 2179: 1731: 1661: 1647: 1561: 930: 301: 1727: 2178:

Thanks for the Barnstar! I'm pleased to know that my work at RFPP is appreciated! :)

1804:

Thanks. I think we've responded to everything already. Have a look at the talk page.

1791: 1629: 1316: 1245: 642: 637:

be a problem to get the concerns you have with the article resolved within a week. ++

623: 593: 556: 433: 397: 268: 157: 918:

Yes, I agree, it's an amusing user box! Feel free to copy it just like I copied it!

267:

I am VanTucky on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/VanTucky. Thanks. --

2220: 1545: 1383: 1338: 950: 809: 2018: 2004: 1698: 1669: 1226: 784: 669: 362: 340: 324: 242:

Thanks for your message. I see that my leniency toward Frikkers was in vain --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1697:

travesty of a disambig page. Ok, I guess you can see what I'm saying here ;) -

1873: 1046: 253: 243: 2102: 2092: 1814: 1805: 1781: 427:

It has been outstanding on the GA nomination page since 12 September 2007.

379:

Thanks for the clarification and validation. It was still a blind edit. --

252:

Thanks very much for the barnstar. It was very kind of you. Take care --

394:

I'll make sure I do that. Sorry, I just started reviewing articles today.

2345: 2252: 1334: 1312: 779:

Hey...I'm guessing you're an admin. How do I get an article protected?

638: 619: 574:

unkind to me. I don't understand. All I ask is that you please be civil.

339:

The delete went through! Thanks for your help in dealing with that pill!

2145:

template. What do you think of my change to the picture arrangement.--

1443: 472:

Thank you for your time. BTW, thanks for the compliments on the table;

2464: 2433: 2340: 478: 2101:

Yep, now that I read it gain it really didn't come off right. Sorry.

2062: 2040: 2030: 734: 510: 2010:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

1694: 1370: 1218:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

780: 2201:

of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published.

1876: 1119:

License edits under consideration to accommodate Knowledge (XXG)

1049: 1538:

More on what may happen concerning this topic is discussed here

1813:

I've responded to your concerns. Please see my comments soon.

1333:

The Anal sex and evolution section that you got rid of in the

25: 613:

Talk:SS_Christopher_Columbus#Failed "good_article" nomination

1896: 1838: 1131:

News and notes: Historian dies, Wiki Wednesdays, milestones

1069: 1011: 656:"Hindukush Kafir people" information moved to a new article. 1948: 1858: 1834: 1166: 1031: 1007: 1560:

There are proposals to use guinea pig meat as a staple on

1642:

Knowing you have an interest... I removed a paragraph on

2226:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta

1528:, I'm alerting all of the editors that took part in the 2335: 1409: 1396: 1274: 945: 895:

And your reasoning seems changing from time to time...

713: 506: 365:, among others) article which needs some serious work. 115: 2395:

P.S. Should this be in sportspersons or politicians?--

1906:

Biographies of living people grow into "status symbol"

2075:? Or something else? Sorry to pester you with this. 443:

Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional (Puerto Rico)

1530:

the deletion debate for the article Adult-child sex

323:. They are all unfounded - just frustrating! Ugh! 1918:News and notes: Wikipedian Robert Braunwart dies 1095:Wikimedia Commons reaches two million media files 555:Nonsense and joke edits are vandalism. period. 2228:. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. 1532:that it is now a deletion review, as seen in 1564:, but as of 2007 this has not been attempted. 8: 1937:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 1155:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 1913:WikiWorld comic: "George Stroumboulopoulos" 783:appeears to be under constant onslaught by 424:Would you review this film for GA status ? 2428: 2038:Hello. Many thanks for your review of the 1257: 2438: 2321:scandals already. I think that's enough. 1925:WikiProject Report: League of Copyeditors 1242:Talk:Cillian Murphy#Cillian.27s blue eyes 2425:Knowledge (XXG) has a new administrator! 1890: 1790:No problem, it was next in line anyway. 1329:An unsourced section that was deemed POV 1072: 1063: 2275:What is meant to be and what is not... 1999:Sorry for the tardiness in sending the 1374:: Quick-fail of Good Article nomination 1075:From the editor: Brion Vibber interview 513:for more information. Happy editing! -- 2445:Thank you for voicing your opinion in 315:Thanks for the nomination for deletion 300:Your revert of my edit to the lead of 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2414:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 2385:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 2164:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 1520: 1290:without everyone's help, it's really 1107:Community sanction noticeboard closed 854:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 346: 330: 223:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 195:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 145:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 7: 2045:doesn't require them. Well, if they 1728:Durham School of the Art's talk page 1143:WikiProject Report: Military history 1100:San Francisco job openings published 1083:Wikimania 2008 awarded to Alexandria 906:I am open for further discussion. 804: 678:Please accept my sincerest apologies 2131:I see you have moved some images. 1425:Are you mad at me for some reason? 1112:Bot is approved to delete redirects 1088:Board meeting held, budget approved 114:GA review. I was curious why when 511:Yankee#In other parts of the world 24: 1901:Fundraiser opens, budget released 1124:WikiWorld comic: "Soramimi Kashi" 2463: 2432: 2339: 2135:does not say anything about the 1942:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 1623:Therapies for multiple sclerosis 1297: 1261: 1160:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 808: 477: 29: 2264:Click "show" to see my message. 1831:updated for October 22nd, 2007. 1004:updated for October 15th, 2007. 910:13:44, 14 October 2007 (GMT+8) 122:reviewed, you instead reviewed 1399:was rude. That's all, really. 797:Haystacks (Monet) - GA finally 110:Hey! Thanks for starting the 1: 2266: 296:Phenomenonology vs. existence 126:. Is it expertise related?-- 2431: 2419:04:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2390:04:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2353:14:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2326:00:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2299:14:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 2256:22:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2241:10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2210:01:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2191:Newsletter for November 2007 2183:23:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2169:22:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2122:02:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2106:01:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2096:01:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2080:00:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2054:23:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 2022:15:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 1871: 1843:The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost 1818:23:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 1809:23:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 1800:22:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 1785:21:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 1770:04:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 1748:23:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1714:04:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1685:04:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1651:15:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1633:13:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1615:18:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1598:18:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1580:05:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1549:20:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1511:04:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1430:04:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1417:04:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1404:04:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1387:23:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1372:Matthew Bourne's The Car Man 1366:19:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1342:18:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1324:23:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 1294:how we all pulled together. 1249:04:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 1230:10:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 1044: 1016:The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost 995:02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 977:02:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 954:05:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 934:11:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 882:21:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 859:14:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 792:10:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 770:19:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 751:19:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 728:03:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 688:01:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 673:21:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 650:00:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 631:15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 602:04:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 579:04:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 565:04:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 550:04:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 532:23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 501:23:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 467:21:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 437:08:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 410:00:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 351:15:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 2462: 2262: 1979: 1881: 1197: 1054: 401:23:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 384:20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 374:19:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 335:14:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 310:02:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 291:02:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 277:02:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 257:00:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 247:02:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 228:20:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 200:15:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 166:19:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 150:14:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 2484: 2280: 1956: 1866: 1668:and have him change it? - 1521:It's now a deletion review 1174: 1039: 2189:WikiProject Good Articles 1992: 1951: 1940: 1935: 1928: 1923: 1916: 1911: 1904: 1899: 1861: 1722:Durham School of the Arts 1210: 1169: 1158: 1153: 1146: 1141: 1134: 1129: 1122: 1117: 1110: 1105: 1098: 1093: 1086: 1081: 1034: 419:Casino Royale (1967 film) 1272:Thanks for your help in 18:User talk:Steven Walling 1544:. I'll see you around. 1280:SS Christopher Columbus 924:USA_PATRIOT_Act#_note-2 390:Thanks for your message 1844: 1489: 1465: 1286:. She would have been 1017: 710:Talk:Haystacks (Monet) 2127:Man Enters the Cosmos 1842: 1644:Catahoula Leopard Dog 1484: 1461: 1355:Talk:Nuristani people 1136:Wikimedia in the News 1015: 875:Thanks for the help! 42:of past discussions. 540:With all due respect 2455:¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 2344:. Hope this helps, 2198:November 2007 issue 1930:Features and admins 1542:Overturn and delete 1284:Good Article status 1148:Features and admins 826:good article status 1884:About the Signpost 1868:Volume 3, Issue 43 1845: 1359:User:Sze cavalry01 1057:About the Signpost 1041:Volume 3, Issue 42 1018: 505:Oh, and regarding 282:Randi demonstrated 2471: 2470: 2460: 2417: 2388: 2313: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2282:Knowledge (XXG). 2167: 2024: 1997: 1996: 1988: 1947: 1946: 1895: 1894: 1854: 1853: 1745: 1693:And there's also 1638:Catahoula Leopard 1611: 1594: 1576: 1348:Nuristani people‎ 1309: 1308: 1305: 1269: 1236:re Cillian Murphy 1232: 1215: 1214: 1206: 1165: 1164: 1068: 1067: 1027: 1026: 959:GA articlehistory 857: 832: 831: 821:Haystacks (Monet) 693:GA ArticleHistory 321:the deletion page 263:IRC cloak request 226: 198: 148: 124:Haystacks (Monet) 112:Haystacks (Monet) 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2475: 2467: 2458: 2456: 2450: 2436: 2429: 2399: 2370: 2350: 2343: 2296: 2291: 2271: 2267: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2238: 2237: 2149: 2144: 2138: 2009: 1980: 1976:Single-Page View 1949: 1897: 1859: 1850: 1835: 1796: 1766: 1761: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1612: 1610: 1595: 1593: 1577: 1575: 1412:was quite rude. 1303: 1301: 1277: 1267: 1265: 1258: 1217: 1198: 1194:Single-Page View 1167: 1070: 1032: 1023: 1008: 987: 969: 914:Bush userbox.... 839: 812: 805: 762: 743: 720: 707: 701: 666:Nuristani people 598: 561: 528: 523: 518: 497: 492: 487: 481: 463: 458: 453: 348: 343: 332: 327: 307:ScienceApologist 288:ScienceApologist 273: 208: 180: 162: 130: 120:Chicago Marathon 116:I asked for help 106:GA review choice 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2454: 2452: 2443: 2427: 2363: 2346: 2333: 2318: 2294: 2289: 2263: 2248: 2234:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 2231: 2230: 2217: 2215:Preity Zinta FA 2193: 2176: 2142: 2136: 2129: 2114: 2088: 2077:DionysosProteus 2051:DionysosProteus 2036: 1848:Weekly Delivery 1846: 1833: 1794: 1777: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1741: 1732: 1724: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1658: 1640: 1625: 1609: 1592: 1574: 1556: 1523: 1394: 1376: 1351: 1331: 1304:anchors aweigh! 1273: 1256: 1238: 1021:Weekly Delivery 1019: 1006: 985: 967: 961: 943: 916: 889: 869: 865:Thespis (opera) 833: 818:helped promote 799: 777: 760: 741: 718: 705: 699: 695: 680: 660:Unfortunately, 658: 616: 596: 559: 542: 526: 521: 516: 495: 490: 485: 461: 456: 451: 446: 422: 392: 358: 356:Blind reversion 341: 325: 317: 298: 284: 271: 265: 240: 160: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2481: 2479: 2469: 2468: 2461: 2444: 2439: 2437: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2362: 2359:Greg Skrepenak 2356: 2332: 2329: 2317: 2314: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2247: 2244: 2219:Hi there. The 2216: 2213: 2192: 2186: 2175: 2172: 2128: 2125: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2035: 2026: 2003:this week. -- 1995: 1994: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1978: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1945: 1944: 1939: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1915: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1880: 1870: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1832: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1776: 1773: 1754: 1751: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1688: 1687: 1657: 1654: 1639: 1636: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1562:space stations 1555: 1552: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1420: 1419: 1393: 1390: 1375: 1369: 1350: 1345: 1330: 1327: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1295: 1278:the good ship 1270: 1266: 1255: 1252: 1237: 1234: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1196: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1133: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1079: 1078: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1043: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1005: 999: 998: 997: 960: 957: 942: 940:Merle Terlesky 937: 915: 912: 908:Horace.wk.chan 888: 885: 868: 862: 830: 829: 813: 803: 798: 795: 776: 773: 754: 753: 703:articlehistory 694: 691: 679: 676: 657: 654: 653: 652: 615: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 584: 583: 582: 581: 568: 567: 541: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 445: 440: 421: 416: 414: 391: 388: 387: 386: 381:75.195.130.190 371:75.195.130.190 357: 354: 316: 313: 302:parapsychology 297: 294: 283: 280: 264: 261: 260: 259: 239: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2480: 2466: 2459: 2457: 2448: 2442: 2435: 2430: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2369: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2349: 2342: 2337: 2331:Your question 2330: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2315: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2292: 2285: 2279: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2268: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2245: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2235: 2227: 2222: 2214: 2212: 2211: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2181: 2173: 2171: 2170: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2148: 2141: 2134: 2133:WP:MOS#Images 2126: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2033: 2032: 2027: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2016: 2014: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1907: 1902: 1898: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1879: 1878: 1875: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1857: 1849: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1830: 1827: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1774: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1752: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1737: 1735: 1729: 1721: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1645: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1622: 1616: 1613: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1590: 1589: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1572: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1563: 1553: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1373: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1253: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1235: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1222: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1161: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1003: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 981: 980: 979: 978: 974: 970: 958: 956: 955: 952: 947: 941: 938: 936: 935: 932: 927: 925: 919: 913: 911: 909: 904: 900: 896: 893: 886: 884: 883: 880: 876: 873: 866: 863: 861: 860: 855: 851: 847: 843: 838: 827: 823: 822: 817: 814: 811: 807: 806: 802: 796: 794: 793: 790: 786: 782: 774: 772: 771: 767: 763: 752: 748: 744: 736: 732: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 714: 711: 704: 692: 690: 689: 686: 685:72.225.36.158 677: 675: 674: 671: 667: 663: 662:Sze_cavalry01 655: 651: 648: 644: 640: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 625: 621: 614: 611: 603: 600: 599: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 580: 577: 576:72.225.36.158 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 563: 562: 554: 553: 552: 551: 548: 547:72.225.36.158 539: 533: 530: 529: 524: 519: 512: 508: 504: 503: 502: 499: 498: 493: 488: 480: 475: 471: 470: 469: 468: 465: 464: 459: 454: 444: 441: 439: 438: 435: 431: 428: 425: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 408: 403: 402: 399: 395: 389: 385: 382: 378: 377: 376: 375: 372: 366: 364: 355: 353: 352: 349: 344: 337: 336: 333: 328: 322: 314: 312: 311: 308: 303: 295: 293: 292: 289: 281: 279: 278: 275: 274: 262: 258: 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 237: 229: 224: 220: 216: 212: 207: 203: 202: 201: 196: 192: 188: 184: 179: 174: 169: 168: 167: 164: 163: 154: 153: 152: 151: 146: 142: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2451: 2440: 2397:TonyTheTiger 2368:TonyTheTiger 2364: 2347: 2336:Ding dong... 2334: 2319: 2286: 2283: 2249: 2233: 2232: 2221:Preity Zinta 2218: 2196: 2194: 2177: 2147:TonyTheTiger 2140:double image 2130: 2115: 2089: 2072: 2067: 2061: 2046: 2039: 2037: 2029: 2028:Synopses in 2012: 2008: 2000: 1998: 1957: 1882: 1872: 1867: 1855: 1847: 1828: 1792: 1778: 1762: 1756: 1738: 1733: 1730:? Thanks! -- 1725: 1700: 1671: 1641: 1626: 1605:the_undertow 1604: 1588:the_undertow 1587: 1570:the_undertow 1569: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1541: 1525: 1524: 1485: 1462: 1395: 1377: 1352: 1332: 1310: 1291: 1287: 1239: 1220: 1216: 1175: 1073: 1055: 1045: 1040: 1028: 1020: 1001: 962: 944: 928: 920: 917: 905: 901: 897: 894: 890: 879:Adam Cuerden 877: 874: 870: 837:TonyTheTiger 834: 819: 800: 778: 755: 696: 681: 659: 617: 594: 557: 543: 514: 483: 473: 449: 447: 432: 429: 426: 423: 413: 404: 396: 393: 367: 359: 338: 318: 299: 285: 269: 266: 241: 206:TonyTheTiger 178:TonyTheTiger 158: 128:TonyTheTiger 109: 78: 43: 37: 2316:Larry Craig 2119:Aboutmovies 2086:Sorry again 2068:which parts 1357:; in fact, 867:Peer review 36:This is an 2034:and beyond 1874:22 October 1554:Guinea Pig 1047:15 October 775:Protection 118:] getting 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 2361:quickfail 2323:FCYTravis 2180:Acalamari 2174:Thank you 1765:Shankbone 1734:Mr.crabby 1648:Noles1984 1534:this link 1380:talk page 931:Lou Crazy 887:Go stones 816:This user 715:Regards, 476:did that 342:₪ ask123 326:₪ ask123 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 2366:queue.-- 2338:. NEXT! 2207:Dr. Cash 2203:Comments 2015:spamlist 2013:Signpost 2001:Signpost 1982:Shortcut 1972:Tip Line 1968:Newsroom 1964:Archives 1829:Signpost 1662:This one 1656:Clifford 1630:Garrondo 1526:VanTucky 1392:Rudeness 1335:anal sex 1246:JayHenry 1223:spamlist 1221:Signpost 1200:Shortcut 1190:Tip Line 1186:Newsroom 1182:Archives 1002:Signpost 434:Tovojolo 430:Thanks, 398:Tovojolo 238:Boerboel 2441:Thanks! 1986:WP:POST 1546:Flyer22 1444:Shemale 1384:Jacklee 1339:Flyer22 1275:getting 1254:Thanks! 1204:WP:POST 986:Georgia 968:Georgia 951:Mista-X 789:Sadhaka 761:Georgia 742:Georgia 719:Georgia 407:Fabiopl 173:WP:LEAD 39:archive 2447:my RfA 2246:My Rfa 2112:McNary 2063:Hamlet 2041:Hamlet 2031:Hamlet 2019:Ralbot 2005:Ral315 1775:Thanks 1753:Talese 1742:(Talk) 1363:Angelo 1227:Ralbot 785:Davin7 735:Beagle 670:ask123 527:eybaná 496:eybaná 462:eybaná 363:Davin7 2295:linca 2290:linca 1795:Tucky 1760:David 1487:(UTC) 1292:swell 1268:pull! 984:Sandy 966:Sandy 781:Asana 759:Sandy 740:Sandy 717:Sandy 597:Tucky 560:Tucky 272:Tucky 254:Samir 244:Samir 161:Tucky 16:< 2195:The 2103:Wrad 2093:Wrad 2073:that 1959:Home 1877:2007 1815:Wrad 1806:Wrad 1782:Wrad 1695:this 1666:GCHQ 1508:A.Z. 1427:A.Z. 1414:A.Z. 1410:This 1401:A.Z. 1397:This 1288:sunk 1177:Home 1050:2007 991:Talk 973:Talk 946:This 766:Talk 747:Talk 724:Talk 507:this 2410:bio 2381:bio 2348:Qst 2253:SJP 2160:bio 2047:did 1974:| 1970:| 1966:| 1962:| 1793:Van 1313:Lar 1282:to 1192:| 1188:| 1184:| 1180:| 850:bio 824:to 712:. 639:Lar 620:Lar 595:Van 558:Van 347:{t} 331:{t} 270:Van 219:bio 191:bio 159:Van 141:bio 2416:) 2387:) 2166:) 2143:}} 2137:{{ 1984:: 1758:-- 1705:is 1676:is 1315:: 1202:: 993:) 975:) 949:-- 929:-- 856:) 835:-- 768:) 749:) 726:) 706:}} 700:{{ 641:: 622:: 517:Ag 486:Ag 482:-- 452:Ag 369:-- 225:) 197:) 147:) 94:→ 64:← 2412:/ 2408:/ 2406:c 2404:/ 2402:t 2400:( 2383:/ 2379:/ 2377:c 2375:/ 2373:t 2371:( 2162:/ 2158:/ 2156:c 2154:/ 2152:t 2150:( 1709:n 1707:o 1703:l 1701:A 1680:n 1678:o 1674:l 1672:A 1446:: 1321:c 1319:/ 1317:t 989:( 971:( 922:( 852:/ 848:/ 846:c 844:/ 842:t 840:( 828:. 764:( 745:( 722:( 647:c 645:/ 643:t 628:c 626:/ 624:t 522:ü 491:ü 474:I 457:ü 361:( 221:/ 217:/ 215:c 213:/ 211:t 209:( 193:/ 189:/ 187:c 185:/ 183:t 181:( 143:/ 139:/ 137:c 135:/ 133:t 131:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.