635:
reverted by only one other user. That can only be taken one way. No consensus, no discussion, just reverting with paltry edit summaries instead. If my edits are wrong why only one other editor reverts them. Shouldn't that be considered as hounding? Why should contributing to
Knowledge be under such hostile conditions? What have I ever done to JJBers to deserve such abuse? The focus on what should or shouldn't be happening misses the point. Thank you for your advice, though. I'll do my best from now on to hold my horses.——→
22:
910:
833:
760:
574:
214:
195:
674:
Thank you for your response. I have tried to reason with whoever and to no avail! It appears the editor in question spends more time trying to ban other editors... evidenced by his or hers number of ANI discussions... rather than constructively editing anything else. I may be wrong, and I hope I am,
481:
Thank you for your reply. Your removals were not inappropriate and I believe they were done in line with
Knowledge policies. However, your edit summaries did not point out which image or file was being removed, though your reasons for doing so were explained and backed up by policy. For the sake of
544:
which specifically relates to non-free content use in userboxes and clearly shows which file was removed. So, all the information about which files were removed and why they were removed was right there in the edit history of each page. Anyway, as long as you check the copyright license of any files
634:
It was no guise, it was a reconsideration. Nonetheless, you are right. Try to remember that I am a human being: flaws and all. Trying to do the right thing should not involve emotional reactions, mine included. Try to imagine attempting to improve an article in
Knowledge while almost every edit is
246:
Marchjuly's initial post was about you using the West Haven seal in your sandbox. Later, you removed the UConn template from your user page saying it was a non free image. Marchjuly noticed that and then left you a note basically saying you didn't have to remove the UConn template. It's always been
486:
here. I would ask that in the future you wouldn't be so ambitious in removing my edits in my sandbox or userpage, and instead please warn me first as I will heed any such warning. If you believe any such removal warrants such a degree of immediacy, please at least indicate what you are removing.
377:
Thank you for your gracious comments! I am grateful for your patience with me. I hope you will accept my apology. Nonetheless I do not buy your explanations. Let's look at the record, shall we? (I want to assure you that I had no intention of using any image unauthorized by wikipedia. It was
497:
User pages are available to
Knowledge users personally for purposes compatible with the Knowledge project and acceptable to the community; Knowledge is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Knowledge policies concerning the content of pages can and generally do apply to user
134:
I left the previous times I removed such images from your sandbox; therefore, I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. Please try to be more careful and check the licensing of any file you want to add to your user sandbox and refrain adding any more that are non-free. If you have any
170:
and is from
Knowledge Commons. Images from Commons are generally OK for user pages since Commons only accepts freely licensed or public domain images. This does not mean, of course, that every image currently on Commons has been uploaded under a correct license, but most should be OK. --
772:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
845:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
276:
seal from my sandbox. I was not addressing that. Aren't sandboxes places where editors can construct edits to be placed elsewhere so as not to tie up an article and to avoid editing conflicts? In other words what I place in my sandbox is temporary:not intended to remain. His comment
446:
explaining why I removed a file from a page and these almost always contain links to the relveant policy or guideline page explaining why the file was removed. Assuming you read the edit sums, I'm not sure why you feel that the files were inappropriately removed. --
725:". That may sound a little old fashioned but it is intended to mean the same as "dropping the stick". If life is too short to complain about things I cannot change, then what you have done to change me contradicts that advice. What ever happened to
206:
in
Knowledge and Wikimedia Commons. That means the author recreated an image that should be trademarked. What I placed in my sandbox is listed in Category:School user templates which does contain the image in question. You may have mistaken
531:
clearly states "Do not include non-free files (copyrighted files lacking a free content license) on your user page or on any subpage thereof, per the non-free content policy. Non-free files found on user or user talk pages will be removed
498:
pages, and users must observe these policies. Users believed to be in violation of these policies should first be advised on their talk page using.... (subst:uw-userpage).... when immediate action is not otherwise necessary.
567:
483:
873:
800:
857:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
784:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
340:
to remain in a user sandbox, even temporarily, just because its a sandbox. So, if you're working on an improvement to an article in your sandbox and your improvement involves non-free content, just
281:
was about UConn logo1.png. I would also like to point the TBAN quagmire I now face should I try to remove that infoxbox from my sandbox, or to even discuss it. Thank you and have a nice day!——→
221:. I may have used the seal image when I became distracted by another user's edit war. In any event the seal image was never intended to be used. Now, may I please have your blessing to use
328:
A user sandbox is a place where editor's can try out different things, but sandboxes are still subject to most of
Knowledge's various policies and guidelines as explained in
424:@StephenTS42. If you check the edit history of your user page you will see that I have only made one edit to it to remove the non-free seal; the "C" was actually removed by
536:(bold added by me for emphasis) and, if unused in a Knowledge article, will be deleted entirely." A link to that section was added to my edit sums. I also added a link to
325:
and thus is not subject to said policy. I was just trying to let you know that you can use the "C" in your userbox if you want, but should have been clearer in doing so.
612:
especially under the guise of the edit being a "copyedit." Even calling him "the antagonist" shouldn't be happening. Stop commenting on other users like that.
398:
I had placed that city's seal into my sandbox for the purpose of editing the infobox-- never intending to let it remain. So, Marchjuly's first post was
310:
317:. If you click on those files, you'll see that the former has been uploaded locally to Knowledge under a non-free license and thus is subject to
971:
887:
814:
402:
about that city's seal... being that his edit removed, or edited out UConn's seal on that date; not that city's seal. The second post was
520:
425:
950:
541:
883:
810:
39:
35:
917:
903:
975:
202:
and it is currently being used or linked to more than 100 pages in
Knowledge! That image is described as being the author's
295:
His first post was about the West Haven seal in your sandbox. His second post was about the UConn logo on your user page.
378:
merely an experiment. You are right about my use of UConn' seal being wrong but not so with UConn logo1.png!) To start:
866:
793:
675:
but whoever appears to be interested in nothing else but banning any editor that disagrees with his or her opinion. ——→
410:
previously. Now the both of you are twisting the facts to your advantage. I have admitted to my bad, why can't you?——→
406:
about UConn's seal as he had already edited it out. Yet he had removed the "C" image I wanted to use and belonged with
963:
921:
899:
878:
805:
309:
Hi again StephenTS42. My first post had to do with non-free content use in general, but my second post had to do with
241:
69:
967:
48:
127:
854:
781:
545:
before adding them to you userpage and avoid any that are licensed as non-free, you should be fine. --
730:
676:
636:
579:
501:
411:
396:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:StephenTS42/sandbox&diff=791642929&oldid=791622964
392:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:StephenTS42/sandbox&diff=783242781&oldid=783227113
388:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:StephenTS42/sandbox&diff=783227113&oldid=783117490
282:
226:
997:
653:. You need to open discussion as well. Hopefully the expanded topic ban will prevent further issues.
492:
314:
159:
519:
of each edit I made and the reasons why they were removed were given in the edit sums. For example,
979:
649:
You say he reverts you without consensus but you also revert him right back without consensus. See
550:
524:
452:
432:
407:
357:
222:
176:
148:
140:
119:
705:
54:
438:. I only removed non-free images from your sandbox and user page. As for a warning, please read
382:
Yes, it was wrong to use that image and for that I apologize. Then it was removed by Marchjuly:
987:
946:
841:
768:
726:
384:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:StephenTS42&diff=783242995&oldid=783201324
380:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:StephenTS42&diff=783201324&oldid=780259440
337:
515:
For your future reference, the files which I removed could be clearly seen by looking at the
850:
777:
341:
99:
50:
21:
865:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
792:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
247:
okay for you to have that template on your page. No one suggested you had to take it down.
102:
and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as
993:
345:
318:
111:
110:". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy
862:
789:
658:
617:
561:
546:
516:
476:
448:
372:
353:
349:
300:
252:
187:
172:
144:
115:
107:
87:
348:
said content until after you add your changes to the article to avoid any issues with
933:
858:
785:
716:
701:
697:
689:
650:
601:
537:
333:
163:
136:
103:
91:
86:
Hi StephenTS42. The licensing of each image you see on Knowledge is determined by it
527:(the userbox with the "C" logo) and not me or someone else. As for giving warnings,
528:
443:
439:
329:
322:
167:
131:
123:
95:
832:
759:
932:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
696:
one still going on about the situation. Move on, edit some articles, maybe even
106:
because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "
610:
sarcastically (or not sarcastically...) referring to someone as "his magesty"
669:
654:
629:
613:
368:
296:
263:
248:
52:
390:
the image was also removed from my sandbox which I am also not contesting.
1001:
891:
818:
738:
709:
684:
662:
644:
621:
587:
554:
509:
456:
419:
361:
304:
290:
256:
234:
180:
152:
608:
for personal attacks if they occur. With that in mind, you should not be
986:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
869:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
796:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
213:
194:
217:
which is not. I had been experimenting with the above template in my
700:. Life's too short to be complaining about things you can't change.
872:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
799:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
55:
15:
908:
118:, which says that non-free content can only be used in the
721:
As I have already stated: "I'll do my best from now on to
268:
Excuse me, but Marchjuly's comment above does not mention
386:
which I am not contesting but stating as fact. Secondly:
974:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
956:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
853:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
780:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
609:
605:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
939:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
321:, while the latter has been uploaded to Commons as
90:and not every image file you see on Knowledge is
272:seal nor its removal. Yes, he also removed the
692:, please. It's over, it's done, and you're the
332:. Relevant Knowledge policies wouldn't allow
198:has no reference to it being listed as being
63:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
225:as a user box on my userpage? Thank you!——→
523:shows that you were the editor who removed
606:mentioned blocks may need to be considered
135:questions about this, feel free to ask as
158:Hi again StevenTS42. Just for reference,
918:File:Sunrise from Stroffolino Bridge.jpg
904:File:Sunrise from Stroffolino Bridge.jpg
500:I apologize for any misunderstanding!——→
442:for reference. I almost always leave an
211:which is listed as non-free content for
945:notice, but please explain why in your
311:File:University of Connecticut Seal.svg
428:you made when you removed the userbox
394:(A warning would have sufficed) Next:
122:. For this reason and as explained in
73:when more than 5 sections are present.
126:, non-free content cannot be used in
112:Knowledge's non-free image use policy
94:the same. Some files are licensed as
7:
990:of each individual file for details.
842:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
769:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
571:
100:free licensed suitable for Knowledge
319:Knowledge's non-free content policy
934:deleted for any of several reasons
924:because of the following concern:
839:Hello, StephenTS42. Voting in the
826:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
766:Hello, StephenTS42. Voting in the
753:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
209:University of Connecticut Seal.svg
14:
959:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
942:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
130:. Perhaps you did not notice the
67:may be automatically archived by
831:
758:
572:
482:etiquette, and good will I will
212:
193:
20:
928:unused, low-res, no obvious use
876:and submit your choices on the
803:and submit your choices on the
566:OK, that's good advice. I have
192:I don't follow you. The image
114:. One of these restrictions is
538:WP:UBX#Caution about image use
1:
892:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
855:Knowledge arbitration process
782:Knowledge arbitration process
1002:01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
819:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
978:allows discussion to reach
1017:
970:exist. In particular, the
884:MediaWiki message delivery
811:MediaWiki message delivery
604:closed the ANI thread, he
964:proposed deletion process
739:01:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
710:01:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
685:01:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
663:23:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
645:21:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
622:17:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
588:14:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
568:already dropped the stick
555:13:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
510:11:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
457:03:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
420:01:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
362:22:17, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
305:21:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
291:20:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
257:20:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
235:20:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
181:22:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
153:14:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
734:
680:
640:
583:
505:
415:
286:
230:
128:User:StephenTS42/sandbox
930:
913:
70:Lowercase sigmabot III
926:
922:proposed for deletion
912:
851:Arbitration Committee
778:Arbitration Committee
976:files for discussion
951:the file's talk page
529:WP:UP#Non-free files
493:Knowledge:User pages
491:about this as well:
440:WP:UP#Non-free files
338:copyright violations
315:File:Uconn logo1.png
160:File:Uconn logo1.png
124:WP:UP#Non-free files
98:or licensed under a
578:Have a nice day!——→
540:to my edit sum for
525:Template:User UConn
408:Template:User UConn
223:Template:User UConn
166:; it's licensed as
968:deletion processes
914:
867:arbitration policy
794:arbitration policy
82:Non-free image use
900:Proposed deletion
727:Sticks and Stones
242:talk page stalker
120:article namespace
77:
76:
1008:
991:
961:
960:
944:
943:
911:
835:
762:
720:
673:
633:
577:
576:
575:
565:
487:There is also a
480:
437:
431:
376:
267:
245:
216:
200:non-free content
197:
191:
164:non-free content
104:non-free content
88:copyright status
72:
56:
24:
16:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1006:
1005:
985:
972:speedy deletion
958:
957:
941:
940:
909:
907:
896:
895:
836:
828:
823:
822:
763:
755:
714:
667:
627:
598:
573:
559:
534:without warning
474:
435:
429:
366:
261:
239:
185:
108:non-free images
84:
68:
57:
51:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1014:
1012:
982:for deletion.
962:will stop the
906:
897:
874:the candidates
837:
830:
829:
827:
824:
801:the candidates
764:
757:
756:
754:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
723:hold my horses
690:Drop the stick
597:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
484:Drop the stick
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
334:BLP violations
326:
307:
83:
80:
75:
74:
62:
59:
58:
53:
49:
47:
44:
43:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1013:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
989:
983:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
954:
952:
948:
937:
935:
929:
925:
923:
919:
905:
901:
898:
894:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
875:
870:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
847:
844:
843:
834:
825:
821:
820:
816:
812:
808:
807:
802:
797:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
774:
771:
770:
761:
752:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
718:
713:
712:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:have some tea
695:
691:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
671:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
646:
642:
638:
631:
626:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
595:
589:
585:
581:
569:
563:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
543:
539:
535:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
490:
485:
478:
458:
454:
450:
445:
441:
434:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
374:
370:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:public domain
320:
316:
312:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
271:
265:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
243:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
210:
205:
201:
196:
189:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:public domain
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:public domain
93:
89:
81:
79:
71:
66:
61:
60:
46:
45:
42:
41:
37:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
988:page history
984:
966:, but other
955:
947:edit summary
938:
931:
927:
915:
877:
871:
848:
840:
838:
804:
798:
775:
767:
765:
722:
693:
599:
533:
496:
488:
473:
403:
399:
278:
273:
270:West Haven's
269:
218:
208:
203:
199:
85:
78:
64:
34:
26:
879:voting page
806:voting page
731:StephenTS42
677:StephenTS42
637:StephenTS42
580:StephenTS42
570:Thank you!
502:StephenTS42
412:StephenTS42
283:StephenTS42
227:StephenTS42
994:FastilyBot
863:topic bans
790:topic bans
433:User UConn
274:West Haven
980:consensus
920:has been
916:The file
859:site bans
786:site bans
562:Marchjuly
547:Marchjuly
542:this edit
521:this diff
489:guideline
477:Marchjuly
449:Marchjuly
426:this edit
373:Marchjuly
354:Marchjuly
350:WP:NFCC#9
330:WP:UP#OWN
188:Marchjuly
173:Marchjuly
145:Marchjuly
132:edit sums
116:WP:NFCC#9
992:Thanks,
717:Primefac
702:Primefac
602:Primefac
596:Civility
444:edit sum
204:own work
92:licensed
27:Archives
279:clearly
219:sandbox
162:is not
141:WT:NFCC
65:30 days
949:or on
651:WP:BRD
137:WP:MCQ
600:When
517:diffs
352:. --
143:. --
998:talk
888:talk
849:The
815:talk
776:The
735:talk
729:?——→
706:talk
694:only
681:talk
670:Only
659:talk
655:only
641:talk
630:Only
618:talk
614:only
584:talk
551:talk
506:talk
453:talk
416:talk
371:and
369:Only
358:talk
346:link
342:hide
313:and
301:talk
297:only
287:talk
264:Only
253:talk
249:only
231:talk
177:talk
149:talk
902:of
495:--→
404:not
400:not
344:or
336:or
139:or
1000:)
953:.
936:.
890:)
882:.
861:,
817:)
809:.
788:,
737:)
708:)
683:)
661:)
643:)
620:)
586:)
553:)
508:)
455:)
436:}}
430:{{
418:)
360:)
303:)
289:)
255:)
233:)
179:)
151:)
38:,
996:(
886:(
813:(
733:(
719::
715:@
704:(
679:(
672::
668:@
657:(
639:(
632::
628:@
616:(
582:(
564::
560:@
549:(
504:(
479::
475:@
451:(
414:(
375::
367:@
356:(
299:(
285:(
266::
262:@
251:(
244:)
240:(
229:(
190::
186:@
175:(
147:(
40:2
36:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
