196:. What I meant was that some votes were already visible before putting the ballot into the box, since some people did not fold their ballots so that their vote was readily visible to bystanders (as shown in several of the images of the Mashable source). This has little to do with the transparent boxes, but I think it's an important fact to add that secret voting was only optional, since it (unlike the boxes) contradicts democratic standards as I know them. (Also, the voting cabins were semi-transparent, apparently, further reducing secrecy.) --
623:
21:
511:). It does not matter if you consider your revert supported by others or consistent with discussion on article talk page. Yes, I agree that your last edit was good. However, insertion of unsourced information is not vandalism, unless this is something like an obvious obscenity, and therefore is not exempt from 3RR. Happy editing,
363:
It's very uncommon (I've never seen a nickname field for a politician) so it should be well-sourced and notable. I think you'll find that most sources that mention it consider it an alleged nickname. Aksyonov himself disputes the nickname, arguing it was fabricated along with the criminal allegations
211:
If voting cabins were semi-transparent that should be added, no question. If some people did not fold their ballots that is their own choice. If envelopes had been available and some voters just chose not to use them it wouldn't be notable either. It sounded like the edit was belabouring the point.
40:
I see you fact checking my source but I'd just like to tell you that if something is supported by one source but missing another tidbit not in it, I probably got it from the Kyiv Post daily log and just forgot to cite it. I'm sure the 'governor escaped' stuff is somewhere, virtually all of the text
230:
images at two of the three polling stations shown (the third seems to have nontransparent ones). FWIW, I don't agree that "if some people did not fold their ballots that is their own choice". It can put significant societal pressure on any dissenters to "prove" they voted the "right" way; e.g. in
75:
before removing content outright, add a tag or something to the sentence - that way other editors (ie, me) can double check it. I added all the content myself but its possible that I read 2 sources that were similar and inserted the one that missed the point you're looking for. I'll try to double
60:
OK. I'm new to
Knowledge so I'm sorry if I go about things the wrong way. I'll try to get your input before making any significant changes. I've found some useful information from that could be incorporated into the article. Regarding Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, it reads, "On January 24, about 1,000
76:
check the statements you're finding issues with to see where I got that info so that it's properly sourced. The entire reason I made the article was for my own edification in keeping track of all the news and sources, so, we're both in this for accuracy (and I for sure didn't make anything up) --
231:
the GDR people were "expected" not to use the voting cabins, thereby removing the secrecy of the vote. At least in
Germany, it IS forbidden to show your vote to anyone; I would have thought this was common in democratic countries. (But maybe we should discuss this at the article talk page...) --
112:
The does state, "According to some, Chudnov fled through the back door of his office." which is what I thought the claim of escape was based on. I just didn't think it was strong enough support and I couldn't find any other sources on the matter. Perhaps the
English translation was imperfect?
467:
and is how the article currently stands. Given that the article was featured on the home page, I figured it prudent to revert the problematic edits and add related information with appropriate attribution and sourcing as per consensus on the talk page. Thank you for your concern.
666:, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
276:
I don't want to add the "pressure" part to the article without a source, only the fact that several people voted openly, for which we have a (photographic) source. People can draw their own conclusions from this fact, which may be as different as ours here...
245:
In Czech
Republic (my country), you will not be allowed to vote if you don't use a cabin, and a ballot, which is not in the official pre-stamped envelope, is invalid. (It would be nice to move this entire discussion to the article's talk page.) —
61:
protesters held a vigil outside the building and demanded that the governor, Vasily
Chudnova, resign, but he has thus far refused." which seems to imply that the governor was still in the regional administration building as of 24 January.
259:. . . political history. Even so, without a source that reports on concerns of 'societal pressure' as a result of the voting procedure/environment it is original research on our part to speculate about how Crimean voters might have felt.
695:, can you please explain what is the appropriate course of action if I believe a user has breached his sanctions for pages related to Eastern Europe. I apologize if I overlooked it but I could not find an answer at
840:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
652:. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "
364:
by opposition politicians. Even if it was a nickname he had in the past, it is not a nickname now; being only used by his opponents. All things considered, it seems inappropriate to have it in the infobox.
725:(AE) for any discretionary sanction or any sanction imposed by the Arbitration Committee. If this relates to Lvivske, note that there is already a report on the edit warring noticeboard and on AE.
143:
i believe so. also, ive added to the talk page, it appears things have changed but i havent seen it in the news over the past few days so its a bit crossed up where the stuff currently stands. --
537:
recently so I'll refrain from making any reverts there for a while. And perhaps I was overzealous in describing the last revert as vandalism. But surely at some point an obvious POV edit
659:
637:
559:. No, simply "POV" is never vandalism, even though edits made by this IP are so obviously improper. However, making a comment like "vandalism" in edit summary can be interpreted as
640:) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the
490:
had been reverted by another editor with the description "childish POV'. I thought "childish POV" was a bit generous for the second time. How would you characterize his edit?
718:
700:
598:
653:
486:, I considered the phrase "pseudo-referendum", its unsourced description as "illegal", and the insertion of scare quotes around "referendum" as vandalism. Further,
696:
663:
273:
I can understand that in an "unendangered" democracy this enforcement may seem unnecessary; so showing your marked ballot is allowed/tolerated in Canada?
463:
where I later proposed a solution which correctly attributed the claims to the appropriate body. This solution was accepted and added to the article
212:
On the other hand, I wouldn't be opposed to an edit that noted how the ballot boxes were visible to bystanders during voting if that can be sourced.
865:
805:
420:. Note that WP:BRD is not a policy and therefore can not be used as an excuse. Also note that last edit you reverted was not vandalism
567:
like placing obscenities. If you see obvious vandalism just "undo" their edits and make a warning. If this continues, report them on
722:
541:
vandalism, right? If the same edit is made a fourth or fifth time, can I consider it vandalism? I'll keep what you said in mind.
861:
770:
736:
677:
629:
255:
I see what you guys are getting at. In Canada things are a bit more relaxed but thats probably because we have a less . . .
576:
516:
460:
429:
340:
The nickname field exists for the politicians infobox. Please explain where it's not supposed to be used and this isn't a
305:
181:
597:
Hello, you participated in a previous move request regarding Crimea and
Ukraine, so I thought you might be interested in
507:
is very clear about this. It does not matter if your reverts (undoing work by other editors) are related to each other (
852:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
417:
857:
649:
606:
529:
prohibited making the same revert three times. Thanks for pointing that out me. I now realize that I also broke
633:
572:
512:
444:
425:
313:
296:
282:
236:
201:
443:, I judged the edit to be irrelevant and requested discussion on the talk page in the edit summary and on the
641:
785:
774:
740:
704:
681:
542:
491:
469:
365:
341:
260:
213:
129:
114:
95:
62:
602:
699:. Do I need to warn the editor and wait for a second violation before reporting? Should I report at
439:
The former two reverts are unrelated to each other and are unrelated to the latter three. Regarding
291:
As requested by Petr Matas, I'll copy this discussion to the article talk page if you don't mind. --
853:
766:
732:
673:
645:
309:
292:
278:
232:
227:
197:
20:
829:
820:
352:
164:
151:
84:
49:
849:
833:
848:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
810:
247:
185:
193:
With respect to the same article, I do not understand your reason for reverting my edit
845:
837:
761:
727:
692:
668:
841:
568:
560:
530:
526:
504:
388:
380:
413:
346:
158:
145:
78:
43:
622:
869:
814:
793:
778:
744:
712:
685:
610:
580:
563:
on your part. It's better never make such comments. They do not help if this is
550:
520:
499:
477:
433:
373:
357:
317:
300:
286:
268:
250:
240:
221:
205:
188:
169:
137:
122:
103:
89:
70:
54:
755:
Regarding your recent edits to
Lvivske's appeal, please ensure you comment
391:
rule on March 20, and once again on March 21. For example, all these your
721:
if it's an edit warring related sanction (such as a 1RR restriction) or
226:
Sorry if my edit wasn't clear. Semi-transparent cabins are shown in the
94:
I'll be sure to make use of tags in the future. Thanks for the advice.
556:
534:
395:
non-sequential edits during just a few hours on March 21 were reverts:
41:
I've added has been facts taken verbatim from the sources I consult. --
182:
Talk:Crimean referendum, 2014#Reason for not dispatching OSCE monitors
804:
Hello
Stephen, taking into account your BLP concerns, have you seen
601:
that is intended to address objections to the previous one. Cheers.
412:. This can be reported not only on WP:3RR noticeboard, but also on
459:
which was an edit and not a revert. This was all discussed on the
128:
Is the head of a
Regional State Administration always a governor?
836:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
616:
Discretionary sanctions apply to pages relating to Eastern Europe
636:
to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at
26:
451:
so, after informing him, I subsequently reverted his edit
658:
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at
660:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions
638:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions
487:
483:
464:
456:
452:
448:
440:
421:
409:
406:
403:
400:
396:
308:(Feel free to revert if you prefer to keep it here.) --
194:
703:
or some place else? Thanks for any help you can give.
719:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
701:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
509:"whether involving the same or different material"
828:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
593:Another move request regarding Ukraine and Crimea
447:. 85.140.218.205 reinserted the edit but later
8:
723:Knowledge:Arbitration/Resquests/Enforcement
697:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures
664:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures
455:. Later I added a supporting source with
383:and Eastern Europe discretionary sanctions
15:
418:Discretionary sanctions on Eastern Europe
25:
808:on Piskorski's far-right affiliation?
416:because these subjects are covered by
7:
662:, with the appropriate sections of
784:Will do. Thanks for the heads-up.
14:
854:review the candidates' statements
27:Click here to leave a new message
621:
19:
656:" section of the decision page.
180:Stephen, please have a look at
156:05:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)--
860:. For the Election committee,
830:Arbitration Committee election
821:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
870:17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
170:05:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
751:Arbitration enforcement page
138:02:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
123:02:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
104:01:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
90:01:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
71:01:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
55:01:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
18:
856:and submit your choices on
885:
862:MediaWiki message delivery
794:23:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
779:22:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
745:21:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
713:17:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
686:03:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
611:00:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
581:04:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
551:00:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
525:For some reason I thought
521:23:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
500:21:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
488:an identical previous edit
478:21:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
434:20:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
374:19:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
358:19:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
318:22:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
301:21:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
287:21:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
269:21:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
251:20:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
241:20:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
222:19:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
206:18:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
189:17:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
815:15:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
789:
708:
650:normal editorial process
546:
495:
473:
369:
264:
217:
176:Crimean referendum, 2014
133:
118:
99:
66:
834:Arbitration Committee
759:in your own section.
630:Arbitration Committee
646:standard of behavior
642:purpose of Knowledge
838:arbitration process
573:My very best wishes
513:My very best wishes
426:My very best wishes
850:arbitration policy
445:author's talk page
800:Mateusz Piskorski
565:obvious vandalism
461:article talk page
449:agreed to discuss
356:
168:
155:
88:
53:
33:
32:
876:
813:
786:Stephen J Sharpe
705:Stephen J Sharpe
648:, or follow any
625:
599:this new request
543:Stephen J Sharpe
492:Stephen J Sharpe
470:Stephen J Sharpe
366:Stephen J Sharpe
350:
261:Stephen J Sharpe
214:Stephen J Sharpe
162:
149:
130:Stephen J Sharpe
115:Stephen J Sharpe
96:Stephen J Sharpe
82:
63:Stephen J Sharpe
47:
23:
16:
884:
883:
879:
878:
877:
875:
874:
873:
858:the voting page
824:
809:
806:the new sources
802:
753:
690:
689:
626:
618:
603:Anythingyouwant
595:
385:
338:
178:
38:
12:
11:
5:
882:
880:
827:
823:
818:
801:
798:
797:
796:
752:
749:
748:
747:
654:Final decision
644:, satisfy any
634:administrators
632:has permitted
627:
620:
619:
617:
614:
594:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
480:
465:with this edit
384:
378:
377:
376:
342:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
310:Roentgenium111
293:Roentgenium111
279:Roentgenium111
274:
233:Roentgenium111
198:Roentgenium111
177:
174:
173:
172:
126:
125:
110:
109:
108:
107:
106:
37:
34:
31:
30:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
881:
872:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
822:
819:
817:
816:
812:
807:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
758:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
724:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
670:
665:
661:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
624:
615:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
592:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
479:
475:
471:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:You violated
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
361:
360:
359:
354:
349:
348:
343:
335:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
249:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
229:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
187:
183:
175:
171:
166:
161:
160:
153:
148:
147:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
124:
120:
116:
111:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
91:
86:
81:
80:
74:
73:
72:
68:
64:
59:
58:
57:
56:
51:
46:
45:
35:
28:
22:
17:
825:
803:
760:
756:
754:
726:
691:
667:
657:
596:
564:
538:
508:
392:
386:
345:
344:argument. --
339:
256:
192:
179:
157:
144:
127:
77:
42:
39:
555:Please see
257:interesting
846:topic bans
811:Petr Matas
482:Regarding
424:. Thanks,
248:Petr Matas
186:Petr Matas
842:site bans
762:Callanecc
728:Callanecc
693:Callanecc
669:Callanecc
347:Львівське
159:Львівське
146:Львівське
79:Львівське
44:Львівське
36:RSA stuff
771:contribs
737:contribs
678:contribs
533:over at
353:говорити
336:nickname
228:Mashable
165:говорити
152:говорити
85:говорити
50:говорити
539:becomes
535:Svoboda
832:. The
569:WP:AVI
561:WP:NPA
531:WP:3RR
527:WP:3RR
505:WP:3RR
389:WP:3RR
381:WP:3RR
414:WP:AE
306:Done.
866:talk
790:talk
775:logs
767:talk
757:only
741:logs
733:talk
709:talk
682:logs
674:talk
628:The
607:talk
577:talk
557:here
547:talk
517:talk
496:talk
474:talk
430:talk
393:five
370:talk
314:talk
297:talk
283:talk
265:talk
237:talk
218:talk
202:talk
184:. —
134:talk
119:talk
100:talk
67:talk
826:Hi,
868:)
844:,
792:)
777:)
773:•
769:•
743:)
739:•
735:•
711:)
684:)
680:•
676:•
609:)
579:)
571:.
549:)
519:)
498:)
476:)
432:)
399:,
372:)
316:)
299:)
285:)
277:--
267:)
239:)
220:)
204:)
136:)
121:)
102:)
69:)
29:.
864:(
788:(
765:(
731:(
707:(
672:(
605:(
575:(
545:(
515:(
494:(
484:6
472:(
457:5
453:4
441:3
428:(
422:6
410:5
407:4
404:3
401:2
397:1
368:(
355:)
351:(
312:(
295:(
281:(
263:(
235:(
216:(
200:(
167:)
163:(
154:)
150:(
132:(
117:(
98:(
87:)
83:(
65:(
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
