User talk:Stephenbharrison - Knowledge (XXG)

1775: 1200:, and I have to object to how you've framed Crimo's attempts to write an article about himself, especially the final paragraph. My read of that paragraph is that you think (or want your readers to think) that those efforts are a symptom of major narcissism, or perhaps some kind of personality disorder. To be blunt, that is a swing and a complete miss. I can't count the number of times I've deleted some "up-and-coming young artist," "social media influencer," or "entrepreneur"'s blatantly self-promotional page (and 2dgirl's deleted page is no different from any of those). Some folks take the hint the first time their creation is deleted, some keep at it and get blocked, a few keep on even after getting blocked. Few of these people are doing it because they 1222:

still narcissistic, no? Even in your written comments you call it a "little narcissistic," so I don't see how that characterization can possibly be a "swing and a complete miss." Even in your expressed mode of thinking, it's just a matter of degree. I did not claim in that paragraph that this person had Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The language there is descriptive of the behavior itself, not a clinical diagnosis or a key predictive factor. I also made your same point about people making their own pages for social boost reasons (like prestige and search engine optimization) earlier in the piece, and I agree that it's related to living in a world dominated by social media.

1204:. They are doing it because they don't know those rules and have heard that getting a Knowledge (XXG) page is a big deal and it will get them noticed, misunderstanding the relationship between "fame" and "having a Knowledge (XXG) article". It's social media taken up a notch. It's a little narcissistic, sure, but I would say it probably stems from people growing up and living in a world dominated by social media. Suggesting there is any sort of correlation between "wrote a promotional Knowledge (XXG) autobiography" and "mass murderer" is, at best, a wild exaggeration. 1290:? I am going to say emphatically not. Those aren't even all the people who create autobiographies those are just the people who an edit filter catches - 2dgirl is not in that list. Either you didn't understand how common it is to create a Knowledge (XXG) autobiography, even when you don't qualify, or you did and decided it didn't matter. Either way it led you to a conclusion that feels off and unfair to dozens of people each day to have them labeled in the same way you're labeling a mass murderer. Best, 1226:

the nihilist political memes that they were known to post on their Discord channel. My overall point, as I mentioned in that paragraph and a few other places in the piece, is that this person's online history with Knowledge (XXG) and Fandom is part of the story in the same way that other sources are covering this person's history with YouTube, Discord, Spotify, Instagram, and other sites. I won't be online this evening but let me know if you'd like to further discuss tomorrow.

1047:"The Jasenovac concentration camp or Jasenovac concentration camp was the largest concentration camp and extermination camp in the Independent State of Croatia (NDH) during the Second World War. The camp was created as a result of the genocidal policy against Jews, Serbs and Roma in the Independent State of Croatia, which was proclaimed by the Ustasha Homeland Organization on April 10, 1941, under the auspices and direct influence of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy." 1414:; "An article under the title of a person's name should substantially be a full and balanced biography of that person's public life. If the person is notable only in connection with a single event, and little or no other information is available to use in the writing of a balanced biography, that person should be covered in an article regarding the event, with the person's name as a redirect to the event article placing the information in context." 28: 1462:

need for excessive attention and admiration and lacking empathy. I've dealt with numerous individuals who have tried to create their own articles. The large majority do not show these symptoms - indeed, while they can be irritating to talk to, lacking empathy is rarely seen. Being ambitious and self-marketing are not indicative of anything that meets the actual criteria of narcissism. I can't speak for the others above, but where you reply

231: 1639: 1111: 799: 489: 161:

story was the behind the scenes discussions and personalities. I'm interested in doing more feature pieces about the people behind Knowledge (XXG), and would love more ideas about where to look if you have them. I'd also like to write about more female Knowledge (XXG) editors, and the interesting work they are doing. And of course, the contenious battles for certain subjects are fun to cover as well.

182: 320:, which I just checked randomly, you submitted a url in template form, which doesn't work. The latter also has a duplicate named ref error. I'll fix it, but I need to ask you to please use the preview function to check your work before you submit it - whether there's a glitch going on with the aforementioned error or not, you're creating a lot of cleanup work for others here. Thanks, 356:. That's in contrast to very similar info from forbes.com, which you're citing in the proper format within articles. I don't quite understand why this is happening, or what you mean by it being difficult... the citations work the same way in either location. However you're adding citations to the body of an article, can you just do the same thing when editing an infobox? 1489:

would you think of a person who went to a lot of effort to make their own Knowledge (XXG) page?" and gave some additional background on this situation, the average person would say that this sounds very self-oriented and obsessive. It could be that the answer of an average person on the street might well be different than a wiki-insider on this particular point.

141:

the processes of creation and deletion, the subcommunities that focus on a particular topic or particular type of task, the debates over procedural minutiae, the dramatic battles over contentious subjects, etc. Anyway, almost 12 years later and Knowledge (XXG) went from curiosity to something that runs through my personal, academic, and professional lives. :)

1263:

agree and some who disagree with the end--that's fine. I wrote that paragraph by going through the piece and picking out two key themes, hence the 1) and 2) in the paragraph. If you read the piece and notate themes 1) and 2) wherever you see them, that might give me a semblance of what it felt like to arrive at (not start with) that conclusion.

1584:

where I talk about the social cachet of having a Knowledge (XXG) page. That could have been a good place for 1-2 additional sentences about how lots of people have tried to create an article for themselves over the years. The fact that this occurs seems somewhat obvious to me and you, but perhaps not

1488:

I try to be aware that I am writing for a couple of different audiences with these pieces, including both wiki-insiders and "civilians." I think wiki-insiders know more than most that a LOT of people try to write a page for themselves. But if I picked the average person on the street and asked, "What

1262:

You are right that ~95% of the piece is reporting and the last paragraph, something like ~5%, is more in the nature of an opinion or an interpretation. You don't have to agree with that interpretation but I think that it's reasonable. Right now I am getting a ton of emails in my inbox from people who

572:

Hi Stephen. I'm genuinely sorry, as Knowledge (XXG)'s more divisive pages can be a fascinating subject to talk about, but I would prefer not to be part of an article on one. The internet can be a rather unpredictable place and you just never know whose unwanted attention you'll get if you're featured

1785:

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've

1431:

Thanks for this. For background, my editor and I decided to go with "Consciously or not" because I wasn't seeing much editorial discussion about it. At the time, I wasn't finding an interaction where one editor told the other not to make a specific page for the suspect. I can see how that wording is

1355:

Sure. If you want to assume (without making that assumption explicit) that well over 90% of the population is narcissistic and nihilistic and then based upon that assumption conclude that anyone who tries to create a Knowledge (XXG) page about themselves is likely to be narcissistic and nihilistic I

1325:

I also take exception to the implication that repeatedly trying to create a Knowledge (XXG) article about yourself -- even breaking Knowledge (XXG)'s rules in those attempts -- are in any way indicative of narcissism or nihilism. Self-promotion is as common as dirt and has been since our paleolithic

1245:

But not the last paragraph. That is armchair something that fundamentally misunderstands Knowledge (XXG) to advance a point. This point driven writing is something which I can't remember you having done before or at least to the extent that you've done it, you've marshaled actual evidence to support

1225:

The second point, indicated 2) in that paragraph, is about nihilism. A total nihilist would not feel obligated to follow rules, whether those are rules against violence or the rules of an internet encyclopedia. I see elements of nihilism in both this person's interactions with Knowledge (XXG) and in

1221:

Hi GeneralNotability. Thanks for your note and for reading the piece. It sounds like you took issue more with the last paragraph than the rest of the reporting, so I will focus on that. Of course, there are lots of ambitious young people who try to make themselves a Knowledge (XXG) page. But this is

1077:

says "Croatian article - in various versions that were online between 2007 and December 2020 - presented a grossly distorted picture of the notorious extermination camp" and "The article’s leading paragraph, posted in August 2018, dropped any reference to “death camp” and described Jasenovac as “the

336:

Okay, thank you. As you mentioned, the link might not be populating automatically as it usually does. I will go back in and check for this with my recent edits. I also have some questions with adding sources to these company info boxes. It's difficult to cite information within the info boxes, and I

140:

For me, back in 2006 I started looking at Knowledge (XXG) as an academic curiosity. As soon I understood the "encyclopedia that anyone can edit" idea, I just had to dig into the behind the scenes processes to figure out how that could possibly work at all. The rules the community wrote and lives by,

1503:

The average person on the street has lots of misconceptions about Knowledge (XXG). I would hope your job as a journalist is to inform and illuminate. And to echo something NBB said, you have a reputation among Wikipedians that I know for doing that; I am guessing that the average person has no idea

351:

No problem, and thanks for replying. I'm noticing that the citations you add within the body of an article's text don't have any problems, but the ones you add to the infobox always do (in the handful of edits I just took a look at). This is the sort of thing I keep seeing with your employee number

110:

Ah, I would be VERY interested in this, but I'm actually based in Dallas and just flew up to investigate for the one subway article. Maybe I can schedule another research trip up for another article, though? I find these communities fascinating, and think they make very positive stories, too. Best,

1579:

Now that it's been a few days since publication, I have had some time to think about the story itself and whether I should have told it differently. I still don't think my conclusion is off the mark, but that's just my interpretation. On the other hand, I am thinking now that perhaps I should have

1484:

Thanks for this Nosebagbear. Just a reminder for everybody who's following along, I didn't actually use the words "narcissism" and "narcissistic" in the piece. I know that narcissism has a precise clinical definition. I am only using narcissism here on WP as a shorthand to refer to point 1) in the

1461:

journalist that wiki-insiders like to see write about us - the first one of your pieces I read was the Framgate one, where it was the best external summary I read. However, with this I concur with GN. Narcissism has a specific meaning, functionally an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep

1304:

If someone falls within that group, e.g. someone who has tried to make their own Knowledge (XXG) article and feels offended by the last paragraph of my Slate article, please have them email me or write on here. Happy to talk to them. See also my point to Nosebagbear about how the average person on

1589:, however, I have no idea how many people clicked on that link. When I'm writing these, I am navigating the tricky balance between (a) providing enough context and (b) not torturing the reader with an info dump. Reasonable minds can differ on that balance and the appropriate length for any piece. 1575:

I certainly don't believe that breaking the rules of a website is the *worst* thing that someone can do. Then again, it's not great either, especially if the rule is based on a meaningful principle. In my view, one of the problems we face as a society is this "me first, rules be damned" attitude,

160:

I first started looking behind the scenes of Knowledge (XXG) because I was working on a column for the Outline called "Wackipedia." The idea was to review Wiki articles for accuracy, completeness, and inanity. Although the quality varies widely, I realized fairly quickly that the more interesting

85:). They're open to everyone and are attended by experienced Wikipedians, brand new users, open culture enthusiasts, librarians, educators, journalists, and all sorts of other people interested to learn more or get more involved with Wikimedia projects. There will be pizza and it takes place in an 1081:

I appears to me that you got the facts right but made an error by implying that the current article says that Jasenovac was merely a labor camp. I think a followup on when the denialist claims were inserted and how long it took the Croation Knowledge (XXG) to get it right would be an interesting

759:

I've seen that something you sent me, thank you for your interest! I think you're fully accurate with your paragraphs, although I personally would take the sprawling Indian population into account. People seem to like it when people die. Well, let's say that differently 😂 Death seems to attract

370:

I think the difficulty is just that the info box templates do not have a way to automatically generate the citation (that I am seeing). Also quite a few of these companies are using different types of info boxes -- for example, the number of employees field does not appear as an option in all of

1509:

and you used your platform to suggest to the average Slate reader (who is already a bit different from the average person on the street) that they should think that too. And that is what has caused 4 very experienced Wikipedians to come to your user talk and pushback which is unusual in and of

1371:

narcissistic and nihilistic, but saying trying to create a Knowledge (XXG) page is evidence of that makes about as much sense as saying that his having facial tattoos or posting rap videos proves that he is narcissistic, or that his exceeding the speed limit in his Honda fit proves that he is

297:. In both cases, two separate employee numbers were mentioned, the citation had broken formatting, and the url had nothing to do with the topic. I don't know if this is the result of an automated process of some sort, or a copy and paste error, but I thought I should let you know. Thanks, 1603:

To be fair, the fact that you don't want to "torture the reader with an info dump" and I pretty much do is the reason you write magazine articles and I design computer hardware (smile). My writing (mostly service manuals and the like) has been described as "railroad track writing -

768:

I reckon 'a report compiled weekly by Knowledge (XXG) volunteers' is an accurate enough description of what the Top 25 is, although I would personally make mention that the subject matter only covers activities on English Knowledge (XXG), just to make things clear to idiots like me

1535:

No, I don't think that it's unusual for experienced Wikipedians to pushback or give feedback on my stories. I get emails after every story these days. For what it's worth, my challenge is that I try to mirror the depth of thinking/effort from the sender and that can take a lot of

1406:. "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Knowledge (XXG) article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." We also have 1057:"For instance, Jasenovac was a concentration and extermination camp during World War II, which is described in detail on English Knowledge (XXG). Hebrew Knowledge (XXG), and other language versions. But according to Croatian Knowledge (XXG), Jasenovac was merely a labor camp." 1786:

talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Knowledge (XXG) friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. —

1504:

how admin are chosen and your article on Tamzin explained that. No one came here to say a peep. But the criticism being offered here isn't about what the average person on the street thinks. You seem to think that a person writing about themselves means that they don't

695:

Stephen, I received your emails. I wish you luck on your article, but I'd rather stay away from any RL media activity. For me, editing Knowledge (XXG) is a hobby to keep my mind busy and I'd like to keep it that way. Felice Enellen said it pretty well above.

257:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1340:

Hmm. The fact that narcissistic and nihilistic behaviors are common does not mean they are not narcissistic and nihilistic, no? The fact that it's as "common as dirt" (your words) might make it boring, but I would argue that the terms would still apply.

144:

I hope you get to attend an event. They can be a lot of fun, and often not what people expect (for better or worse). If you find yourself in NY and want to know what's going on in the local wikiworld, give me a ping or check that page linked above. —

925:

Got your email. I am right in the middle of something so I might not be able to respond before tomorrow morning. I am reading the material you linked to in your email. Unless I find something dodgy there my answer will almost certainly be "yes".

130:. Since there's no "chapter" there, there aren't going to be quite as many events. It looks like there are a few this month, although I don't know if there's a regular meetup (March sees a greater than average number of events everywhere due to 646:, so I thought I'd reach out! I've proposed a WikiProject dedicated to a cappella. This would be a group of editors interested in improving the quality of articles related to a cappella. If you're passionate about a cappella (ranging from the 1397:

Re: "Consciously or not, Knowledge (XXG)’s volunteer editors seem to have adopted a policy akin to some news publications that encourage focusing on the victims of mass shootings rather than “rewarding” the shooter with direct publicity", we

1528:

Yes, I think that someone who says "screw the rules, I'm making myself a page," is acting out of a spirit of nihilism. They think the rules don't matter. I am glad that there are many other people on the street who would agree with

1280:

You can have whatever opinion you want. I don't agree with all of your opinions but I've never challenged them before. What's different is you deciding to base your opinion on facts not in play. Is it fair to say that all of

1524:

Feel free to pushback. I will, too. A few points-- While a wiki-insider has more knowledge about Knowledge (XXG), I do not necessarily believe that they have a superior sense of moral judgment than the average person on the

1774: 1360:

with your byline on it is equally narcissistic -- if one form of mundane self-promotion is evidence of narcissism so is the other. And unless you agree to abide by China's laws about Winnie the Pooh and Mocking the Soviet

1556:

So a search of your social media history would show that you always follow every rule on every website you access? And that anyone who doesn't is "acting out of a spirit of nihilism and thinks the rules don't matter"?

1506:

recognize “objective” rules. They do not feel bound by mere policies like neutrality, avoiding self-promotion, or citing sources other than themselves. A person who thinks rules don’t matter because nothing, in fact,

1287:

1684: 1154: 842: 532: 261:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1242:

that this person's online history with Knowledge (XXG) and Fandom is part of the story in the same way that other sources are covering this person's history with YouTube, Discord, Spotify, Instagram, and other

1731: 1668:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1138:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 826:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 516:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1061: 1246:

it. It really feels, once you learned of this account, that you started with the idea of the last paragraph in mind and decided to end there regardless of what the actual evidence showed. Best,

1653: 1124: 812: 502: 70:

Nice piece in the Times yesterday! Those guys certainly deserve some recognition for their dedication, and I'm glad to see one of our humble WikiProjects get some press, too. :)

760:

viewership, but... why? Hey, perhaps you could team up with a psychologist and do some investigative thing on it! Oh dear, actually not, I'm letting myself get ahead of reality

663: 254: 1078:

largest collection and labour camp in the NDH, and later in SFR Yugoslavia”39 – furthering baseless revisionist claim that the camp had been used by Yugoslav authorities."

1266:

N.B. My favorite email responses and comments are people saying that I must "hate" Knowledge (XXG) or its editors. Like, have you read anything I wrote on the subject?

1585:

to every person on the street. Within that paragraph, I tried to communicate the gist that self-promotion happens on Knowledge (XXG) by linking an old story about the

1062:

https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium.HIGHLIGHT.MAGAZINE-these-nationalists-didn-t-like-what-they-read-online-about-wwii-so-they-rewrote-it-1.10084302

671:

contributing to an article related to a cappella (like that one), please consider joining! If it was also just a passing thing, no worries—completely understood!

960:

For anyone wondering, I can confirm that the email address Stephen used to contact me matches the one at , so I am confident that this is not an impersonator. --

737:

No problem. Thanks very much for letting me know. And if you'd like to be on the email distribution, I have a sign up on my personal site: stephenharrison.com

902: 883: 434: 243: 45: 1202:

do recognize "objective" rules. They do not feel bound by mere policies like neutrality, avoiding self-promotion, or citing sources other than themselves

127: 573:

in a well-read publication. I have enough problems already. ;) But good luck, I suspect it's a subject your editor and readers will be interested in!

1609: 1566: 1539:

Yes, writing on the user talk page is relatively new, but that's partly because I've nudged people to email in the past. Either works for me.

1419: 1377: 1331: 430: 81:, partner with a variety of educational/cultural institutions, and have monthly "WikiWednesday" meetings in Manhattan. The next one is 4/25 ( 1410:, "We generally should avoid having an article on a person if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" and 1326:

ancestors struggled to increase their status in the group. And breaking the rules of a website is also pretty much bog standard behavior. --

1011: 1707: 1177: 864: 554: 1364:

you are nihilistic -- if violating some web site's rules is evidence of nihilism, how much more so is violating a foreign nation's laws?

587:

No problem, I completely understand. I just wanted to ensure that I was reporting on diverse perspectives on the article. Thanks again.

289:

Hi, I'm not quite sure what's going in here, but I've just removed two of your recent edits for the same formatting issues. Please see

273: 82: 1749: 1004: 1074: 1605: 1562: 1415: 1373: 1327: 1007: 1703: 1173: 860: 550: 137:

I agree that the communities are fascinating. Can I ask how you first came to take a peek behind the scenes on Knowledge (XXG)?

1677: 1147: 835: 525: 1561:

It's OK to say "that rule is stupid and I choose to ignore it" just as it it OK for the website to block you for doing that.

1532:

Of course, I think that my job as a journalist is to inform and illuminate. I have tried to do that here and in other pieces.

77:, and I'd like to invite you to come to a meeting/event if you're in the area and so inclined. We have regular events like 720:

One other thing: If/when you do publish that article, could you drop me a pointer on my talk page or via email? Thanks.

1542:

FYI I will not be back online until this evening my time but will look back over this within the next day or so. Best,

247: 1689: 1209: 1159: 847: 537: 1604:

FactFactFactFactFactFactFact...", so your instincts as to what to include are almost certainly better than mine are.

1051: 606:

Hi, I'd be more than happy to cooperate with you on your said article. Be sure to contact me at my e-mail address:

1727:

After several years of distancing, I wan to invite you tomorrow (Jan 17th at 6pm) to the Boston-gathering at MIT.

700: 1087: 420: 313: 294: 200: 1581: 1197: 1075:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Croatian_WP_Disinformation_Assessment_-_Final_Report_EN.pdf

578: 1665: 1403: 1356:

can't say you are wrong. Let's apply that principle in other areas of life, shall we? Publishing something in

1135: 823: 513: 1485:

last paragraph and to respond to some comments. I will use different words to describe it going forward here.

1068: 462:

Thanks to you (and your programmers) for catching this. I've now fixed the link to the disambiguation page.

361: 325: 302: 424: 90: 74: 1205: 680: 267: 1742: 1590: 1543: 1490: 1471: 1433: 1342: 1306: 1305:

the street might think differently about this self-promotion than a wiki-insider who sees it regularly.

1267: 1227: 1024: 944: 738: 624: 614: 588: 463: 380: 338: 162: 112: 1586: 676: 1814: 1083: 886:! Looking forward to your contributions. Please drop me a line if you have any questions. Cheers, -- 782: 407:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

56: 34: 27: 1647: 1118: 806: 496: 1788: 1515: 1295: 1251: 1005:

Talk:Jasenovac_concentration_camp#This article has been mentioned by a media organization: template

983: 965: 931: 574: 337:

think that's probably why so many of these company info boxes do not use sources at all. Thank you

190:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

147: 98: 1661: 1411: 1131: 819: 509: 375:. Some companies have an info box with footnotes/references embedded in the actual info box, e.g. 1452: 1064:

but I cannot read it because it is behind a paywall. Is there a version that is available online?

416: 372: 357: 321: 298: 1407: 650:

to collegiate a cappella groups like The Chordials, or perhaps pop culture representations like

1362: 726: 709: 450: 263: 1673: 1143: 831: 521: 379:. It might just be that I need practice using the source editor more than the visual editor! 1737: 1696: 1467: 1166: 854: 610: 544: 238: 222: 1676:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1669: 1372:

nihilistic. In my opinion, his murdering seven people is better evidence. I'm just saying.

1146:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1139: 834:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 827: 699:

FWIW, that article/topic that you're interested in could be approaching those mentioned in

524:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 517: 1806: 910: 891: 773: 52: 427:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1511: 1291: 1247: 979: 961: 927: 772:

I hope that helped, and I wish you luck with your assignment! Is it an assignment hmm

943:

Great! I can send the questions to you by email or here on WP, whichever you prefer.

652: 643: 441:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

131: 721: 704: 657: 446: 442: 210: 1638: 1110: 901:

Thank you for participating! Summary of our collective effort during the event is

798: 488: 1817: 1795: 1753: 1711: 1613: 1598: 1570: 1551: 1519: 1498: 1475: 1441: 1423: 1381: 1350: 1335: 1314: 1299: 1275: 1255: 1235: 1213: 1181: 1091: 1052:

https://slate.com/technology/2021/09/wikipedia-human-language-wikifunctions.html

1032: 1015: 987: 969: 952: 935: 914: 895: 868: 784: 746: 731: 714: 684: 632: 618: 607: 596: 582: 558: 471: 454: 408: 388: 376: 365: 346: 329: 306: 279: 170: 154: 120: 105: 78: 60: 41: 906: 887: 647: 317: 974:

For those following along at home (And no doubt, in the editorial offices of

1041: 1723:

Invitation to Boston-Gathering, celebrating Knowledge (XXG)’s 22th Birthday

353: 1680:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1150:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1069:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-08-30/Opinion

838:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

528:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1657:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1128:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

816:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

506:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

290: 1732:

Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Boston/Wikipedia_22th_Anniversary_Celebration

638:

Request for Comment: New WikiProject for A Cappella-related articles

1282: 187:

Hello, Stephenbharrison. Please check your email; you've got mail!

1773: 978:) we had a nice email conversation, which I hope will help him. -- 412: 1693:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1163:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 851:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 541:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1683:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

1651:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

1153:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

841:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

531:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1122:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

810:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

180: 48:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

26: 89:. If you can't make that one, you can always check back at 642:

Hi there! I saw some of your good work on the article for

242:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

86: 664:

Here's a link to the proposal for WikiProject A Cappella.

660:) please check out the proposal and share your feedback! 1042:

https://hr.wikipedia.org/Koncentracijski_logor_Jasenovac

500:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1664:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1134:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

822:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

512:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

411:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 236:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

192: 255:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Stoneleigh P

128:

here is the meetup page for the Dallas/Fort Worth area

1587:

North Face promoting itself with content on the site

33:Hello, Stephenbharrison. You have new messages at 764:psst also, it's Ginsburg with the S, not Ginburg 403:Disambiguation link notification for December 29 1432:confusing though so I'll check with my editor. 1576:sometimes called "move fast and break things." 1805:The person you have emailed is indeed me. :) 8: 1782:Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Stephen! 882:Thank you for signing up for today's online 1457:SH, I've no doubt you're aware that you're 1082:read. How quickly are such errors removed? 1105: 793: 483: 1240:Most of your piece does advance the idea 244:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 87:experimental video game nonprofit/gallery 1466:above, I would just go "no, it's not". 354:http://fortune.com/fortune500/l-brands/ 1505: 1463: 1286: 1241: 1201: 623:Okay, sent you an email. Thanks much. 609:Looking forward to hearing from you! 7: 1648:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 1582:the paragraph that begins "In short" 1119:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 807:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 497:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 191: 1666:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1632:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 1464:but this is still narcissistic, no? 1136:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1102:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 824:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 790:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 514:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1192:Regarding your Bobby Crimo article 480:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 75:Wikimedia chapter in New York City 14: 285:Broken formatting on recent edits 253:The article will be discussed at 1637: 1109: 797: 487: 229: 1736:Hope I can see you tomorrow — 1687:and submit your choices on the 1198:the article you published today 1157:and submit your choices on the 845:and submit your choices on the 535:and submit your choices on the 1000:You are a controversial writer 1: 1712:01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 1182:00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1092:18:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 1060:The slate article references 1033:11:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 1016:09:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 915:23:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC) 896:17:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC) 869:02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 559:00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 472:22:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC) 455:09:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC) 389:04:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 366:04:10, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 347:03:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 330:03:46, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 307:03:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC) 61:21:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC) 42:21:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC) 1796:04:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1754:20:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 1196:Hi Stephenbharrison. I read 1023:Thanks for flagging for me. 747:22:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC) 732:13:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC) 715:13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC) 685:05:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC) 633:15:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 619:14:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 597:15:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 583:03:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 196:at any time by removing the 1818:19:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 1606:Guy Macon Alternate Account 1563:Guy Macon Alternate Account 1416:Guy Macon Alternate Account 1374:Guy Macon Alternate Account 1328:Guy Macon Alternate Account 785:08:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 280:20:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC) 1833: 1704:MediaWiki message delivery 1174:MediaWiki message delivery 861:MediaWiki message delivery 756:Hi, my name is Rebestalic 551:MediaWiki message delivery 295:Stanley Black & Decker 155:03:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 121:03:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 106:02:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 91:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/NYC 1730:Details can be found at 1614:21:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC) 988:01:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC) 970:19:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 953:13:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 936:02:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 669:If you could see yourself 175: 171:14:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 83:information about it here 1701:to your user talk page. 1599:22:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 1594: 1571:22:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1552:16:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1547: 1520:15:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1499:15:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1494: 1476:15:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1442:15:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1437: 1424:03:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1382:22:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1351:15:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1346: 1336:04:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1315:15:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1310: 1300:15:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1276:14:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1271: 1256:01:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1236:00:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 1231: 1214:23:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1171:to your user talk page. 1028: 957:Email works best for me. 948: 859:to your user talk page. 752:Journalism? Interesting! 742: 628: 592: 549:to your user talk page. 467: 384: 342: 246:or whether it should be 166: 116: 1402:have a policy on that: 1367:Crimo almost certainly 352:updates in infoboxes: 1779: 884:US housing edit-a-thon 878:US housing edit-a-thon 314:Estée Lauder Companies 185: 93:for upcoming events. 35:Epicgenius's talk page 31: 1777: 1763:Happy holidays!": --> 1662:Arbitration Committee 1645:Hello! Voting in the 1132:Arbitration Committee 1116:Hello! Voting in the 820:Arbitration Committee 804:Hello! Voting in the 510:Arbitration Committee 494:Hello! Voting in the 184: 30: 1559:It's just a website. 1067:This was covered in 1040:Google translate of 443:opt-out instructions 602:Re: Journalist here 568:Re: Journalist here 421:fix with Dab solver 1780: 1678:arbitration policy 1148:arbitration policy 1008:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 836:arbitration policy 526:arbitration policy 433:• Join us at the 423:). Such links are 373:CSX Transportation 193:remove this notice 186: 46:remove this notice 32: 1752: 1714: 1456: 1206:GeneralNotability 1189: 1188: 1184: 875: 874: 730: 713: 703:. Respectfully, 565: 564: 438: 425:usually incorrect 1824: 1812: 1809: 1793: 1791: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1748: 1745: 1740: 1702: 1700: 1641: 1591:Stephenbharrison 1544:Stephenbharrison 1491:Stephenbharrison 1450: 1434:Stephenbharrison 1343:Stephenbharrison 1307:Stephenbharrison 1283:these are people 1268:Stephenbharrison 1228:Stephenbharrison 1172: 1170: 1113: 1106: 1025:Stephenbharrison 945:Stephenbharrison 858: 801: 794: 780: 779: 739:Stephenbharrison 724: 707: 701:WP:NOTNAS-ETHNIC 625:Stephenbharrison 589:Stephenbharrison 548: 491: 484: 464:Stephenbharrison 428: 417:check to confirm 381:Stephenbharrison 339:Stephenbharrison 276: 270: 239:The Stoneleigh P 233: 232: 223:The Stoneleigh P 217: 215: 209: 205: 199: 195: 183: 163:Stephenbharrison 152: 150: 113:Stephenbharrison 103: 101: 49: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1789: 1787: 1778:Happy New Year! 1772: 1768: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1759:Happy holidays! 1743: 1738: 1725: 1717: 1716: 1694: 1642: 1634: 1194: 1164: 1104: 1084:Dalek Supreme X 1002: 923: 905:. All best, -- 880: 852: 792: 775: 774: 754: 693: 640: 604: 570: 542: 482: 435:DPL WikiProject 405: 287: 274: 268: 234: 230: 227: 218: 213: 207: 203: 201:You've got mail 197: 189: 181: 178: 176:You've got mail 148: 146: 99: 97: 68: 50: 39: 24: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1830: 1828: 1802: 1799: 1790:Rhododendrites 1760: 1757: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1685:the candidates 1654:eligible users 1643: 1636: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1577: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1510:itself. Best, 1486: 1479: 1478: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1404:WP:PERPETRATOR 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1365: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1264: 1223: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1155:the candidates 1125:eligible users 1114: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1079: 1071: 1065: 1058: 1055: 1048: 1045: 1038: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 976:The Daily Mail 958: 922: 921:Got your email 919: 918: 917: 879: 876: 873: 872: 843:the candidates 813:eligible users 802: 791: 788: 753: 750: 735: 734: 692: 691:Email received 689: 688: 687: 639: 636: 603: 600: 575:Felice Enellen 569: 566: 563: 562: 533:the candidates 503:eligible users 492: 481: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 404: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 286: 283: 228: 226: 221:Nomination of 219: 188: 179: 177: 174: 158: 157: 149:Rhododendrites 142: 138: 135: 100:Rhododendrites 67: 64: 40:Message added 38: 25: 23: 20: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1829: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1800: 1798: 1797: 1792: 1783: 1776: 1767: 1758: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1741: 1734: 1733: 1728: 1722: 1720: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1698: 1692: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1650: 1649: 1640: 1631: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1460: 1454: 1453:edit conflict 1449: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1244: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1191: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1101: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1006: 999: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 956: 955: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 885: 877: 871: 870: 866: 862: 856: 850: 849: 844: 839: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 815: 814: 809: 808: 803: 800: 796: 795: 789: 787: 786: 783: 781: 778: 770: 766: 765: 761: 757: 751: 749: 748: 744: 740: 733: 728: 723: 719: 718: 717: 716: 711: 706: 702: 697: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 670: 666: 665: 661: 659: 655: 654: 653:Pitch Perfect 649: 645: 644:The Chordials 637: 635: 634: 630: 626: 621: 620: 616: 612: 608: 601: 599: 598: 594: 590: 585: 584: 580: 576: 567: 561: 560: 556: 552: 546: 540: 539: 534: 529: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 505: 504: 499: 498: 493: 490: 486: 485: 479: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 439: 436: 432: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 402: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 358:Jessicapierce 355: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 322:Jessicapierce 319: 315: 311: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 299:Jessicapierce 296: 292: 284: 282: 281: 277: 271: 265: 259: 256: 251: 249: 245: 241: 240: 224: 220: 212: 202: 194: 173: 172: 168: 164: 156: 151: 143: 139: 136: 133: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 108: 107: 102: 94: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 71: 65: 63: 62: 58: 54: 47: 43: 36: 29: 21: 16: 1804: 1784: 1781: 1735: 1729: 1726: 1718: 1688: 1682: 1659: 1652: 1646: 1644: 1558: 1458: 1399: 1396: 1368: 1357: 1195: 1158: 1152: 1129: 1123: 1117: 1073:The page at 1003: 975: 924: 881: 846: 840: 817: 811: 805: 776: 771: 767: 763: 762: 758: 755: 736: 698: 694: 677:Shrinkydinks 668: 667: 662: 658:The Sing-Off 651: 641: 622: 605: 586: 571: 536: 530: 507: 501: 495: 440: 406: 288: 264:power~enwiki 260: 252: 237: 235: 225:for deletion 159: 132:Art+Feminism 109: 95: 79:edit-a-thons 72: 69: 51: 1690:voting page 1468:Nosebagbear 1160:voting page 848:voting page 611:Linguaddict 538:voting page 409:Hanesbrands 377:Xcel Energy 371:them, e.g. 73:There is a 1808:Clovermoss 1674:topic bans 1285:who don't 1144:topic bans 832:topic bans 777:Rebestalic 648:Pentatonix 522:topic bans 445:. Thanks, 429:(Read the 318:First Data 312:...and at 126:Aha. Well 96:Thanks. — 53:epicgenius 44:. You can 1744:Kalliauer 1670:site bans 1580:extended 1512:Barkeep49 1412:WP:PSEUDO 1292:Barkeep49 1248:Barkeep49 1140:site bans 1037:Question: 980:Guy Macon 962:Guy Macon 928:Guy Macon 828:site bans 518:site bans 216:template. 1750:contrib. 1739:Johannes 1507:matters. 1408:WP:BLP1E 1288:matters. 22:Talkback 17:Welcome! 1697:NoACEMM 1525:street. 1167:NoACEMM 855:NoACEMM 722:Toddst1 705:Toddst1 545:NoACEMM 447:DPL bot 291:Arconic 248:deleted 1815:(talk) 1243:sites. 1536:time. 1361:Union 1358:Slate 907:M2545 888:M2545 413:Zorba 1765:edit 1708:talk 1660:The 1610:talk 1595:talk 1567:talk 1548:talk 1516:talk 1495:talk 1472:talk 1438:talk 1420:talk 1378:talk 1347:talk 1332:talk 1311:talk 1296:talk 1272:talk 1252:talk 1232:talk 1210:talk 1178:talk 1130:The 1088:talk 1054:says 1050:but 1044:says 1029:talk 1012:talk 984:talk 966:talk 949:talk 932:talk 911:talk 903:here 892:talk 865:talk 818:The 743:talk 727:talk 710:talk 681:talk 656:and 629:talk 615:talk 593:talk 579:talk 555:talk 508:The 468:talk 451:talk 385:talk 362:talk 343:talk 326:talk 316:and 303:talk 293:and 167:talk 117:talk 57:talk 1794:\\ 1529:me. 1459:the 431:FAQ 211:ygm 206:or 153:\\ 104:\\ 66:NYT 1811:🍀 1801:Hi 1747:- 1710:) 1699:}} 1695:{{ 1672:, 1612:) 1597:) 1569:) 1550:) 1518:) 1497:) 1474:) 1440:) 1422:) 1400:do 1380:) 1369:is 1349:) 1334:) 1313:) 1298:) 1274:) 1254:) 1234:) 1212:) 1180:) 1169:}} 1165:{{ 1142:, 1090:) 1031:) 1014:) 986:) 968:) 951:) 934:) 926:-- 913:) 894:) 867:) 857:}} 853:{{ 830:, 745:) 683:) 631:) 617:) 595:) 581:) 557:) 547:}} 543:{{ 520:, 470:) 453:) 437:.) 419:| 387:) 364:) 345:) 328:) 305:) 278:) 272:, 250:. 214:}} 208:{{ 204:}} 198:{{ 169:) 134:). 119:) 59:) 1769:] 1706:( 1608:( 1593:( 1565:( 1546:( 1514:( 1493:( 1470:( 1455:) 1451:( 1436:( 1418:( 1376:( 1345:( 1330:( 1309:( 1294:( 1270:( 1250:( 1230:( 1208:( 1176:( 1086:( 1027:( 1010:( 982:( 964:( 947:( 930:( 909:( 890:( 863:( 741:( 729:) 725:( 712:) 708:( 679:( 675:— 627:( 613:( 591:( 577:( 553:( 466:( 449:( 415:( 383:( 360:( 341:( 324:( 301:( 275:ν 269:π 266:( 165:( 115:( 55:( 37:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index