User talk:StillWatchesCartoons

20:(they have the actual numbers for CSA's), and the data does not match this table whatsoever. For example, New York CSA is somewhere in the 23 millions and has been since 2010. The Phoenix area is not a CSA and shouldn't be on the CSA list (it is only an MSA per Census maps and tables). The Stat. Areas page has 2018 estimates and the CSA Areas page has 2017, but the numbers are exactly the same. Stuff like that. I have proven some of the census numbers by adding up all the counties so I know there is merit to those Census numbers. 864: 48:

Modesto and Merced as components of the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland CA CSA, and added San Antonio-Pearsall, TX CSA. Not to mention dozens of other less noticeable changes, including adding or subtracting counties from individual MSAs/CSAs. OMB 18-04 is properly cited in the article. The population estimates I used are from the latest census estimates effective 2018, which is also cited in the article.

308: 173: 85: 942:(a) reverting my map and (b) threatening to have me banned as an editor. I filed an arbitration / dispute request on the matter but Knowledge (XXG) has decided to not engage at this time. I will not have an "editor-war" with you, since that would be unconstructive. But my map is always available and can be easily restored. 1011:

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has decided that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Knowledge (XXG) is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's

979:

Bruce - Let's get to the spirit here. You personally called my edits "disruptive" and then you followed with "Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges." These are your words, so yes, that can reasonably be construed as a threat. And this is not because of a flag or a

941:

I take exception (and some offense) to your calling my edits "disruptive" and needlessly complicated. The map I updated was created/uploaded in 2006 and does not reflect current OMB information. I put a lot of time and effort into my cartography and would have respected an honest dialogue before

739:

In my opinion, it should be incumbent on the smaller or lesser known city to have a state name included, or if you want a standard for all 300+ metro areas in the United States, use the OMB approved names, as to keep from these issues being solved by the loudest voice in the room, as you noted the

19:

I have noticed that you made a significant number of edits on both Primary Statistical areas of the US and Combined Statistical areas of the US, and I see a lot of problems with the data that is now in there. Can you please share your source for this data? I am looking at the US Census Bureau data

956:

The map was in fact updated long after its original upload date. An interactive map is welcome, but there's far too many colors and added complications that confuse readers. If you read the notice, this is not a "threat to ban" you; making accusations against other editors and jumping straight to

1038:

to learn more about resolving disputes on Knowledge (XXG). The English Knowledge (XXG) community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration,

983:

Second, you say you are following the BRD process, but the BRD guidelines: "BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes." The reversion, the commentary in the reversions, and then the threat was no invitation for a good

47:

Tyler - I apologize, but I had to undo your revision. As I noted to other editors, per OMB 18-04 effective September 2018, Phoenix-Mesa, AZ CSA was added as a combined statistical area. Also, in the same report, the OMB removed Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA from the New York CSA, added

23:

Unless you have a better source of data, I highly suggest using the numbers from the below links (CSA's and MSA's are both found via links on this page) and getting this data corrected. Just be sure you are viewing the version of the table that matches the year of your estimate.

1012:

decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

715:

You don't mention this, but you may have this standard due to attempted disambiguation. However, this argument fails as well. We are sticking a state name on a Wiki title of a metro area of two million-plus people (like Columbus) whereas the smaller

667:. Firstly, this name conforms to the convention established quite some time ago after long discussion, that we put the state name at the end where there's ambiguity, otherwise we don't put a state name at all. It is used on all such pages, for example 54:

On the MSA page, it seems like Knowledge (XXG) updated populations but inextricably used previous definitions of MSAs. I was not involved in that process, but personally I would have used the 2018 definitions and not the 2013 definitions.

984:

faith discussion. I get it: you have probably made hundreds of edits to this page, added maps and photos and the like, that shows dedication, but such work does not and cannot convey sole proprietorship over a Knowledge (XXG) page.

452: 353: 216: 128: 337:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 200:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 112:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 689:

and is not permitted. Reason being that you lose the attribution history from the page. Page moves should always be made by using the "Move" button at the top, not by cutting and pasting. Cheers —

987:

My only failure was not noticing that you made a 2024 change to the 15-year old map. I don't update maps that were uploaded or edited within the past five years to prevent these conversations.

322: 186: 98: 51:

If you notice an 2010 population estimate that doesn't work, we can look at it, perhaps the Bureau revised its 2010 census count, it does happen. Or perhaps my math was off.

907: 557: 520: 257: 1044: 763:

Hi, I've had to modify some of your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) style is to use sentence-case, except for proper names and acronyms. You can learn more at

275: 809: 583: 900: 27: 906:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

705: 664: 1073: 1066: 271: 957:

arbitration instead of seeking dispute resolution or just simply talking is rash and extremely hostile behavior. I am simply following the

376: 238: 150: 33: 1020: 668: 570: 372: 234: 146: 1040: 1035: 896: 872: 704:

I appreciate your pointing to a standard and your reaching out. But putting the state name is clearly not used on all pages--

424: 346: 209: 121: 888: 717: 915: 919: 686: 358: 221: 133: 884: 563: 1024: 868: 709: 988: 943: 843: 789: 744: 644: 62: 28:

https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html

918:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in 334: 197: 109: 1031:

also exists as a method of resolving content disputes that aren't easily resolved with talk page discussion.

486: 1016: 621: 265: 968: 929: 37: 892: 1081: 671:, and would need a fresh discussion if there's to be a change. The prinipal reason is that if you write 256:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

316: 180: 92: 437: 330: 193: 105: 1056: 775: 631: 1115: 963: 924: 832: 733: 694: 606: 539: 505: 471: 291: 342: 205: 117: 1077: 725: 394: 365: 228: 140: 1048: 1028: 958: 402: 345:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 338: 208:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 201: 120:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 113: 887:

with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the

1076:. I did a bold revert of an IP, and you had made a small edit at the end of it. Cheers. 553:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

268:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 1096: 876: 729: 398: 1119: 1085: 1060: 996: 974: 951: 935: 851: 836: 797: 782: 752: 698: 652: 637: 610: 543: 509: 475: 441: 380: 295: 242: 154: 70: 41: 1052: 768: 679:. But this is very unwieldy, hence the solution of putting the statename at the end. 625: 282:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1111: 1107: 1027:

and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The

828: 824: 690: 602: 598: 535: 531: 501: 497: 467: 463: 287: 283: 867:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge (XXG), as you did at

863: 307: 172: 84: 1015:

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured

712:

as two examples. So the standard you point out is far from consistently applied.

788:

Sure, if you see any further overcapitalization, feel free to change. Thanks!

1047:. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a 813: 1100: 764: 349:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

212:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

124:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

589: 576: 326:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

190:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

102:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

980:

dash, but solely for stylistic reasons as you just mentioned yourself.

961:

process, but a refusal to actually discuss means we're at an impasse.

721: 720:

gets a pass. Few, if any, Knowledge (XXG) researchers would confuse

261: 663:

Hello StillWatchesCartoons, just a message re your recent moves at

1095: