User talk:StraussInTheHouse/Archive 5

1618:

there aren't all that likely to be", and "not enough sources to show notability , butt they certainly exist, so put them in." Since the templates don't indicate the difference, we need to do it outside of the templates. So I think when it looks clearly worthwhile gettingit fixed properly, that it needs to be supplemented by an additional comment in detail. I try to do that, but I admit that I sometimes skip that when I'm in a hurry, (There was one yesterday in fact, where I should have said more. ) The alternative, and if I had had the energy I would have done it, would have been to rewrite the article myself, since it's exactly in my field. Obviously no reviewer has to do that, and some people do not think we should even try. But what I do think we ought to feel obliged to do is give proper guidance, not just apply the nearest template. I think I'll mention it at page, but without giving any specific example.

2696:, could you please do me the courtesy of reading my comment above again. You are mistaken if you believe only women are the targets for abuse. I won't mention names, but I have been subject to a clear and orchestrated case of misandry and harassment myself, out of the blue, on Knowledge (XXG). One in which of course I, as an admin, was powerless to defend myself, because we are not allowed to. I do not dwell on these things, but I believe it was an attempt to settle an old score, made worse by the nature of the user's high standing on the project. I have already mentioned many times on Knowledge (XXG), and it it is also on my user page, that my field of academic work was in linguistics and communication. Cross cultural, socio-linguistics, applied linguistics, and applied foreign languages. I am always dismayed when people attempt to take others' words out of context. 2942:

were working (or not working) at MfD. It's not like there is a list of "bad words", it's just when they are used, you can tell that a line has been crossed. If BHG had done anything provocative, I could give Legacypac the benefit of the doubt but she was completely reasonable and helpful. And I don't even agree with her about these dumb portals! But she was very diplomatic. It never feels good to have someone point out your mistakes but in a collaborative editing project like Knowledge (XXG), it's the way things work here. We can't be too proud. As for Legacypac, they were going so fast on these deletion discussions, it was inevitable that they'd lash out or make a mistake. You can't be manic (which I mean in a nonmedical way) and keep up consistently good work. Anyway, just browsing on your user talk page and found it interesting, the work you do. Happy editing,

4316:). To understand if this kind of models is recognized in a reliable and independent way, probably it is critical to understand how widely they are cited and used by the community. BAITSSS had been widely discussed around the world (Africa, Asia (China), South America and the USA, please review various peer reviewed journal below). The wiki Category:Hydrology models Category:Computer-aided engineering software Category:Numerical climate and weather models have only a few lines description for numerous models which also lacks the independent sources. It is probably due to the fact of the difficulty in getting independent sources (though they had been published and cited independently around the world) in these kinds of topics because of the technical nature, less media attention as well as the lack of general public interest and understanding, and many others. 3669:, which cannot be accessed by the copyvio check tool, or even directly searched for. Like some university CVs, it can only be found by first going to his university home page, and looking there for a link to the CV. The Research interest section is a word for word direct copy. Almost unique in my experience, the journal articles section was also: the titles themselves are of course not subject to copyright, but the section in the article had an arrangement I have never seen before "Two selected publications per year from 2011–2016:" , and the selection and arrangement was an exact copy from the CV. so I have deleted the whole thing and left a notice. Normally I'd rewrite something like this , if necessary completely, since he is highly notable, but I was so annoyed when I saw the basis for the journal article selection, that I decided not to . 2581:, yes I'm from the UK. I've heard the vernacular used in both pubs and informal settings (I consider the former to be a subset of the latter), I'm not sure what has led you to conclude that I haven't. I've heard people in such settings call other people terrible names, both to their faces and behind their backs, but to just claim "bitch" is merely "vernacular" in what is far from a pub or another informal setting, as we are building an encyclopedia, is to claim the sky is red. I'm considering taking my studies to a doctorate level as the philosophy of language is one of my areas of interest, so any tips would, of course, be appreciated. 4998:, I or another reviewer will give your draft a formal review in due course. As I explained to another user in the section above, reviewers tend not to expedite reviews based on talk page requests, however, I am happy to give you feedback on how to improve if you don't know whether to resubmit it or if you've resubmitted it and I think further work will be needed. At a cursory glance, the sourcing looks improved for the most part, however the first section still has sentences which do not have an inline citation, which will most likely result in another decline because all claims about 3621:@Straussinthehouse I hope you’ve enjoyed your weekend! Thank you for that information. I only have one question. On 3/18/19 my page was successfully created in the database. Upon careful review, on 3/18/19 my article was removed and moved to the draft space due to the plot needing to be redrafted. All of the other information in my article was accepted. Since my plot was redrafted, submitted on 3/18/19, and just accepted on 4/27/19; do I now wait for someone from your team to move my article from the draft space and back to the database? Thank you again for your help! I’m so excited :) 878:

direct link to Tentsmuir National Nature Reserve (Reference 1 at the bottom of the draft wikipedia page). 2. I have transferred the five references that you labelled as self-published to a list of Selected Publications, though note in passing that all of those books have been published by reputable publishers with rigorous refereeing processes. It is a little harder for me to search out further secondary sources but perhaps once the page is live others who know Buckland better, especially ecological statisticians, might be expected to add details of which I am unaware.

5147:, thank you for your message. Any approved AFC reviewer can review your draft, but it is common practice to not expedite formal reviews based on talk page messages for transparency's sake and so that reviewers' talk pages aren't contacted by the writers of the several thousand drafts awaiting review. However, I am more than happy to give informal feedback about how to improve your draft, even if you have resubmitted it. You can still work on the draft while it is awaiting review, indeed, this is encouraged. Most drafts I come across have the 2426:, as I was unaware the Committee had issued a decision regarding the meaning of no consensus closures. While the original rationale stands, i.e. the discussion did not generate consensus, the Principles section of the relevant arbitration case does indeed shift the burden of proof onto those providing claims with citations to ensure they are reliable. As there was no consensus as to the reliability of the source, the default outcome of the discussion is that the sentence in question should be 1085: 4404:

discussing it or a review article in an appropriate academic journal. Primary research that simply used BAITSSS is not an RS. I am hopeful that this may be shown to be notable, and I speak as someone with a lifetime of senior professional experience in the water management industry, but at present it simply doesn't get above the notability line. I would like it to succeed, but I am not going to bend the rules to suit my professional interests.

31: 4329:) from American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) also had just completed the report about the current effort of water management in Kansas including BAITSSS and will be soon featured in their website. This report highlights communities that have taken on projects to adapt to or mitigate climate change. The profile may be released prior to the June 11-13, 2019 Annual Conference of the Universities Council on Water Resources ( 3748:

I have sought comments from that reviewer but have received no response. Can you please confirm the present status of my submission in the Wiki system? Your 1st March pink 'declined' banner still appears at the top of the draft and a buff 'Review waiting' banner at the bottom. The number of pending submissions has meantime nearly doubled to 3207. I accept the need for patience to get a decision but is my draft actually under review?

3943: 428:. I know I closed it myself but all of the participants had noted a relist or no consensus closure would have been better, and I would have probably relisted on request if the MRV initiator had bothered to contact me first. I always endorse at move reviews if the initiator doesn't contact the closing user. Either way, it'll be over in a week and I'll leave it to another user to close second time round. Many thanks, 4765: 3816:: I can confirm that I am a real human being, not a semi-automated automaton, and I do not use any editing tools other than the generic Knowledge (XXG) editor. I generally provide fully detailed edit summaries listing every change or category of changes. In this case, my edit summary began "Alt → alt", which reminds me that what brought me to the page in the first place is that it had a 5397:, thanks for your message. For the reasons I have given other users in the above sections, reviewers usually don't expedite formal draft reviews based on talk page messages. However, I can see that you have added some good-quality sources such as Reuters. Due to the amount of sources provided, I can't assess them all in an informal review but if we assume they all give 726:. This station never actually broadcast with the call sign WPNT and there is another station in Indiana that actually did broadcast with this call sign, making "(Indiana)" an inappropriate disambiguator. Furthermore, consensus was in favor of using (AM) as the disambiguator for defunct AM stations, when no other station hold the same call sign on the AM band. However, 4031:, hm, the draft and article do have some differences. Despite it being created first, I declined the draft as the topic is already in the mainspace. Some edits have been made to each page and not to the other by different users, meaning a history merge might be in order after a content merge, however I would probably opt for a merge and then just tag the draft with 2859: 4945:. I'm not sure about sources 7 and 8, but if we assume the best, that's still only two high-quality sources for establishing notability. I won't decline it so it can keep its place in the queue, but for it to be accepted, more work on the sourcing will be needed. Apologies for my delayed response; if you need any more help, please do let me know. Many thanks, 4910:, it can be any reviewer, including myself. However, it is generally the case that reviewers don't expedite reviews based on talk page requests both for transparency reasons and for the volume of messages. I can certainly give you some advice on how to improve the draft though. I note you've resubmitted it but you can still work on it while it's in the queue. 4844: 4782:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 521: 218: 395:, feel free to revert, I'm tired of this particular issue. It's a real bummer when you try to accurately gauge consensus and then someone files a move review and then someone accusing me of a supervote. I close RMs all the time and 99% of the time nobody has a problem with it. Under the circumstances I think closing the move review was justified per 1473: 1432: 3495: 670: 5191:

that resubmission. Is there anything I can do to find out about reviewing status? Could not find anything in the FAQ on monitoring status after a resubmission. My first ever wikipedia article may have fallen through the crack and am afraid to submit a brand new one before understanding what really happened to first ever one. Please advise.

4119:, and a lot of the papers that were cited have overlap both in terms of personnel and institutions. Knowledge (XXG) isn't supposed to be a journal article publisher, it's supposed to be an encyclopedia, so for science, it should summarise scientific consensus on a topic. Something written three years ago with most responses having 2745:, linguistics is a very broad subject and I am just one of many linguists. Anyone who has studied it in depth will have touched on every aspect of it before specialising. I was a long-time energetic supporter of gender/women's/LGBT issues both on- and off-Wiki (outreach) until I was attacked for doing precisely that. 2838:, but as far as I could see and through our collaboration with the WMF as the main community actors to implement some important technical progress with NPP and AfC, I was convinced that he had smartened up his act. I am obviously outvoted here and will therefore stand corrected, and certainly if that is the case, 4620:

the community, cited, discussed, and had contributed to society), even if they are not notable like human beings or places. These poor models cannot be famous like human. What I can say is having wiki page doesn't help/matter that much. I was trying to add something I think that deserves to be in wiki as per your guidelines.

2885:, for what it's worth, my comment wasn't intended to imply that you hold any loyalty towards Legacypac. As I said, I've found him to be agreeable and useful at times, but I just hadn't frequented the areas where this behaviour was not exhibited. The same could be said between us. We have agreed on some things, such as 4082:

subject? Just they feel proud that they are unpaid editor, I have been editing/ reviewer for 20 years to more than 20 journals as volunteer (non paid, that is how it works). As my professor said, don't read wiki articles for science, it is just for people and places, it proved it now. Wiki is not about science.

5608:, I apologise for not getting back to you on your previous message, I think what happened was you left a message when I was travelling and I forgot to turn off the automatic archiving bot, and your message got archived without a response. I note that since my decline you have added some more citations, so 5582:

I asked for an advise a while in regards to fixing my article so it can be submitted. I haven't heard from you as yet. Could you please get back to me so I know what sentence I need to support with inline citations? Can I use a copy of certificates to support the education inforamtion or does it have

2622:

directly. I was the target and victim myself last year of blatant misandry, character assassination, and harassment from the political wing of Knowledge (XXG)'s women and LGBT faction in a poorly disguised attempt to settle an old score. As a result I withdrew my decade long heavy support for

1778:

Dear Strauss thank you so much for your comments I will try and improve this draft, I have removed all links related to Facebook wikipedia and twitter already and replaced them by different sources like Billboard, I have a question regarding musicians and their works is discogs considered a reliable

5155:

the content with inline citations. In this case, we have a one-sentence lead paragraph, and a short paragraph noting simply that Guruswamy participated, in different senses, in three different films, and then gives a filmography. The amount of citations you have provided must surely allow for more

3747:

HI SITH You originally declined my draft for Sedimentary Isostasy two months ago. I edited my draft shortly afterwards and re-submitted it for review, as per my contact with your user page 28th March. Subsequently it may have been considered by another reviewer as Anomalocaris edited it 35 days ago.

1927:

You are correct that the biographic materials were derived from Mr. Golden's expert page on the PRIME Finance. However, a good portion of that material was deleted (as it could be viewed as too promotional). Details were also added on his earlier life and family, material that is not included in the

5190:

The initial rejection flagged several fragments of the submitted draft that were worded far too close to source referred. No other issues were then flagged. The flagged text highlighted fragments were all reworked and article resubmitted. Over two months later now, I don't know what is happening to

2941:

Just wandered on to this talk page and so pleased to see male Knowledge (XXG) editors who can speak up against misogynistic talk when they see it. For me, it's not just a matter of which words that are used but the malice and ill-will directed towards BHG who was simply trying to explain how things

2807:

and diffs, fortunately, carry with them some of their own context. In what sense is this diff not "directed at BHG directly"? Syntactically it certainly is, and connotatively, how can "you are not my mother" be anything other than gendered and personally-directed, although it certainly carries many

2627:

is not the first educated, industrious user to have been indef blocked recently; I have just as much intolerance for PA as the next person, but I guard against deliberately taking people's comments out of context to use them against them for the sake of unnecessary drama. I hope my

2609:

is not a banned word, but I will remind you of something important that I remember well but which was probably well before your time: There was a time when you could fined in the UK for using the 'F' word in public (and people of my generation still frown on its use), then there

877:

Thanks for the advice, StraussInTheHouse. Here is what I have done in response to your previous comments, viz "Bad news: you've used Facebook and five self-published sources to back up claims which should really be supported by secondary sources." 1. I removed the Facebook link and replaced it by a

610:

draft I had been working on for potential copyright issues. I followed up with you on your talk page letting you know that I had edited issues with the draft and had hoped it could be re-reviewed. You had said that you would have another look at the source text and would replace the template with a

4702:

Thank you for the encouragement. Unless someone provides me a real guideline how to improve, it is just an abstract. Probably, I have changed 3000 times because everyone keeps on giving a false guidelines/impression/understanding, no real guidelines (asking discussions outside academia, I provided

4619:

Thank you. I appreciate. You guys didn't provide me a single wiki page giving an example what you are looking (saying all wiki model sections are not perfect and defending wiki). I am not questioning about those models in wiki, I think, they deserved to be there (if they are published, utilized by

2668:

I don't know what field of academia you worked in, but in the real world of women's safety that sort of language has very dangerous implications. Without revealing too much personal detail, I will say only that the last time it was aimed at me was from a man who later did jail time for his conduct

2085:

Good Evening Mate, I started writing in Wiki a little time ago, So I Directly not Submit a page as there are more chances you banned from the Wiki Community. So I write on Sub User Page Firstly but you declined it as soon as I started writing, Please reconsider it and help me to draft the article.

1617:

of course you were right to decline, and so did I. The problem is indeed that templates are altogethe inadequate. They're OK when the article is unimportant or probably hopeless, and no great effort is worthwhile. But there is a major difference between "not enough sources to show notability, and

195:

Sir I request to you to do the assessment about the article which I recently created and as per my request you moved it to drafting space because they don't comply with Knowledge (XXG) policy. But I'm sorry would you revert your edits sir. I'm sorry to trouble you and wasting your valuable time. I

4668:

printworthy. If you brush up the sourcing as best you can and resubmit it, it may be that it takes a little longer than usual to process as very specialised drafts usually require the attention of a reviewer in that field, but this isn't us saying "this is never going to be included on Knowledge

4496:

Sorry, I have enough said, probably I am not going to discuss further. I again apologize, I have given evidence that the majority of wiki article about models had no external reference because of the same logic. Please give me one good example from wiki about the model with appropriate source and

2842:

has exercised extraordinary constraint, but I do believe that an indef block is not in the interests of the project. Apparently he has left a comment on his talk page. Whether this will be accepted as mitigating, it is not for me to decide. I never interfere with the decisions of my

1519:

Based on prior feedback, I have been working for nearly 6 months on the page and have been rewriting it in my own words so that the language is neutral and reads like an encyclopedia. I wrote much of the website you referenced in your deletion so that may be why it looks like it was plagiarized.

3673:

As a general rule, for academics I try to find the real CV, which is often hidden and not accessible from Google. If I cannot get there directly or indirectly from the university site, I try to find it in some of the presentations, which sometimes link to it. (one of the reasons to look for it,

701:

Thank you! One more question - is this page still considered a "draft" or has it now been approved? I'm asking because it doesn't have the yellow "Review waiting, please be patient" header that I've seen on other draft pages. Should the title be updated to remove the word 'Draft'? What about the

4081:

I never realized wiki is such a mess. I am just confused that every editor put his/her own their own view and it had nothing to do with the written article. What are the reliable sources in BAITSSS, 10 published papers, and 2 USDA mentions, etc, what are knowledge of the editors itself with the

2464:

There is some incorrect information being used within the article which impacts on our rights as brand owners. Whilst we are happy to share information, it is better if that information is accurate, and we would like the opportunity to do this. Our attempts thus far have been rejected without

5300:

Could I request a WP: Refund as per Casiopeia's suggestion? As per his/her recommendation, I will make sure I correct the potential infringement, writing the article on my own words in neutral point of view and free of copyright infringement, and support the content claimed with independent,

2802:

Kudpung, you have said, in this thread, you have said "I remain firmly convinced that the semantics of his statement were in no way directed at BrownHairedGirl directly" and "I am always dismayed when people attempt to take others' words out of context." But the diff in question is

1391:

Hi, Strauss. I have resubmitted an article for review and have included inline citations from national publications and city of SF publications. I am including biographical early life information. Do I need citations in this case? I am not making qualitative asserations, just stating life

2331:@StraussInTheHouse: Hope you enjoyed your holiday. I’ve been off the grid for a while but I’m back haha. During my last submission in mid March I was instructed to redraft the plot of my article. I did so and was awaiting reviewal and approval. Just following up. Thank you so much in advance! 847:, that makes sense. As it’s already closed and the majority were correctly targeted, it’s probably best for a fresh RM as opposed to moving everything back to (defunct) as it consensus was that (defunct) was a poor disambiguator. Feel free to ping me in to the new discussion! Many thanks, 294:

Since you're abstaining from future closing, nothing prevents you from summarizing your closing statement as a participant in the discussion. The policy-guideline weighting is particularly valuable, and you can pass that along so that that the future closer can take it into consideration. --

4403:

for contributing here, but this is where the discussion appears to be. For the record I thought that the draft had merit but was insufficiently well supported by reliable and independent sources. What it needed (and still needs) are reliable sources such as a national Hydrological Institute

1125:

Hello, you just reviewed Shauna Brooks Submission for the Article I Listed 26 Url Sited sources. Could you please HELP me REVISE what you think could possibly get the submission approved. I mean at this point, out of 26 Creditable sources the subject didn’t have at least 3 Major Press links

448:

The original close said "No prejudice against speedy renomination for the year". If people objected they should have done that, it would be much more productive than pushing it back to the old title which was already rejected. Please reverse the MRV close, as you are involved. Thanks

3841:, thanks for the explanation, I've struck the comment. The arrows in the edit summary made me think of AWB because it automatically does that when doing find and replace operations, so I assumed it was an untagged edit. In any event, it wasn't my intention to imply that you were a 1847:

I would love to modify it to not be contrary to the purpose of Knowledge (XXG). It is written about in the New York Times and it simply was not documented in wikipedia for a long time but it is a part of history and should be documented similar to the tax laws in California etc.

1568:

Did you realise she is unquestionably notable as the The George G.C. Parker Professor of Finance and Economics at Stanford? The user needed more specific help than you gave, because it was resubmitted while still inadequately written and documented. Check what I've said there.

4755:

Great, added some introductory sentences as per your suggestions, added one more presentations from ASA, invited talk about BAITSSS. There are other presentations, but not sure if they are valuable, until AAAS publish their report. Please let me know if it had been improved.

247:

Hi, would you mind undoing your close? There's a consensus to move, and most of those being polled were choosing chairperson. I didn't, but I'm happy to do so, and in fact intended to go back and change that just as I saw your close. This may need more than one closer.

2717:

However, the lack of remedy for that situation is not a reason to deny a remedy in this. Two wrongs don't make a right etc. And again, I respectfully suggest that despite your great linguistic expertise, you don't list gendered discourse as one of your specialities.

2561:

I assume from your editing pattern that you come from the UK. So do I. I assume that you've never heard the vernacular used in an English pub or informal setting. Save me the lecture on lexicography and semantics, please - I'm a retired academic on the the subject.

817:

Sure. The problem with the recently closed discussion was that so many pages were being proposed at once that few looked at each article individually, instead focusing solely on the larger discussion as to whether "(defunct)" should be used as a disambiguator.

830:, since this is the last call sign that the station actually broadcast under. Any location oriented disambiguator would be problematic, as all of the call signs it has held, with the exception of WHOT, have been held by other stations in South Bend, Indiana.-- 2910:'s conduct (which, for the record, I don't think has constituted the "stalking" that he claims, all I've seen is an admin doing their job trying to get discussions to run smoothly) without using her gender as a means of criticism. However, as I said at 1265:

I was advised to add in line citations and I wanted to know if every sentence in an article needs an inline citation. I have submitted my article for review using published sources as references in many of my inline citations. Thank you for your time!

2669:

towards another woman. I also urge you to consider that it is very common for men to dismiss evidence of a colleague's misogynist conduct, by noting that they have not seen it happen. That's because it it does not usually happen in their presence. --

5346:'d drafts), however, he, or another administrator, may be willing to e-mail you a copy of the deleted wikitext provided that you ensure that any subsequent resubmissions are not copyright violations. Apologies for the delayed response. Many thanks, 2460:

I am a brand owner and breeder related to the product Broccolini(R), Tenderstem(R) and BimI(R). I have noted with interest the recent requests following our initial attempt to change the wording of the article on the page Broccolini - Baby broccoli.

2893:

changes, but we've had our disagreements. It doesn't mean we can't work together on a collaborative project, because neither of us has egregiously insulted the other. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for the situation at hand. As I said at

2200:

Regarding above statement if the order of the sources are issue I can very well change that. Also before taking decision on decline please go through the other reliable sources and results of his blockbuster movies and coverage on online media.

2918:

and commits to not doing it again. Indefinite doesn't mean infinite, I've been in that position myself, and I genuinely mean it when I say I hope to see him back. But those are the only conditions I can see the community accepting a return.

2614:. It's a bit of a topsy-turvy world when we deliberately look for insult in the use of language - particularly in a literary sense, but also when the vernacular uses it in general expression. I would be extremely surprised if 4177:: furthermore, I forgot to mention, as everyone who contributes to Knowledge (XXG) does so on a voluntary basis, we have no way of checking the academic credentials of most users. This means that we require third-party, unaffiliated 5237:

I assumed too much about the initial article review process. Looks like follow up must be explicitly directed to the initial reviewer through this interface. And sorry for not including link to my reworked draft article. Here it is:

1008:

I'm unsure of the exact material that seems to be copyrighted in the article. It was written out awhile ago and I don't remember copying and pasting information into it. Do you know of the exact areas that are causing an issue?

5160:, and we need a substantive biography and maybe a section on the reception of his work to have a substantial article. Apologies for the delay in response time; please let me know if you require further assistance. Many thanks, 2246:, a decline isn't permanent, it just means it needs more work in the areas identified in the red template and in the comments below it. If you think you've made enough improvements, please feel free to resubmit. Many thanks, 4732:, that's what we want to do, which is why I'm restoring your above comment. Please let us know which piece of advice, specifically, you require clarification on, and we'll be more than happy to explain it. Many thanks, 4554:

isn't a good rationale for including something else. Knowledge (XXG) isn't perfect. If users, yourself included, find pages which don't meet the aforementioned notability guidelines, they are free to nominate them for

2812:. I understand that you may be a loyal friend and ally, but surely there is a point at which anyone must reality-check one's loyalties against what is actually happening, rather than offering what can only be seen as 2646:

Kudpung, I think it is hard to escape the conclusion that the comment was directed at a female admin for a very sincere reason: to try and hit a woman where it hurts even more. I'm sorry to have to disagree with you.

1541:

Hi, I'm not an administrator and I cannot delete pages, nor can I restore pages I have tagged for administrators to consider deleting. Please contact the administrator who deleted the page in question. Many thanks,

721:

I am aware that consensus favored moving these pages to new disambiguators, but in the discussion it was raised that there are specific problems with some of the titles that were proposed. The biggest problem is with

2605:'s work on Wikpedia. For a long time last year we worked hard together to convince the WMF that they needed to develop and introduce some important changes to the way we control the quality of new articles. 5121:

thanks for your quick response last time when you reviewed on 3 January 2019 I have incorporated your inputs, again now you have given few more inputs, cant you approve or it has to be approved by someone else?

466:, I agree, it was an okay closure, but I'm not averse to a relist. As I say, feel free to revert the overturn and the closure of the move review. I want nothing more to do with it, I'm just too pissed off. 4360:

When Dhungel came to work with Aiken at Kansas State University, he brought his modeling tool, called Backward‐Aaveraged IiterativeTwo-Source Surface temperature and energy balance Solution (BAITSSS), with

142:, if they do not fulfill the criteria then please move this articles to draft space so that I work on it otherwise they would be deleted by any Knowledge (XXG) administrator. It would be a great help sir. 2121:, that wasn't what the decline template is supposed to convey. If you want to do more work on it, add sources, and so on, please do so, and let me know and I'll resubmit it on your behalf. Many thanks, 3698:. And furthermore, they created yet an additional version in their sandbox. I deleted these also. Since the contributor haad a corporate username FAB UP, I also blocked both for copyvio and username. 2665:, as I noted elsewhere, "shut up ... bitch ... shut up" is a type of male aggression against women which indicates both rage and misogyny, and which in meatspace indicates an immediate risk of violence. 363:

Why did you overturn the Utrecht tram shooting move? That was done and dusted long ago and there was a clear consensus for the title which emerged. Please reconsider as this makes no sense. THanks —

5075:

I have updated what all you mentioned please review. if you want me to do any specific changes please let me know in details.Please help me do better once again thank you very much for your time

4457:

means. I have a concern that what you may perceive as your critics are being unfairly portrayed as requiring newspaper sources. No so. Science articles flourish in Knowledge (XXG). The charge that

263:, reopened per request. As I’ve relisted twice and removed he closure to allow further consensus to be reached, I’ll abstain from closing it, but I doubt it’ll be relisted again. Many thanks, 4431:

It is impossible to get all the references what you have mentioned in science, wiki is a chronological list of newspaper. Please show me a model which had been discussed in newspaper. Period.

3674:

beyond copyvio, is that it is often the only place that gives a full listing of degrees and positions in simple chronological order. It is also often the only place which gives the birthdate.

1523:

Can you please reinstate the draft page so that I can continue to work on it? I spent many hours compiling the references and need to refer to that work in order to rewrite the content again.

3912:

its content. The first section, “Early life”, remains unreferenced so if you resubmit without improving it in this regard, it is highly likely that it will be declined again. Many thanks,

5266:

on copyright or close paraphrasing grounds, it now appears that the submission has been cleaned of those issues. A reviewer subsequently declined the draft on different grounds, so I am

1924:

Thank you for reveiewing the proposed entry for Jeffrey B. Golden. I do not have a URL to provide you as the entry has been deleted, which I understand given the determination you made.

4883:

on copyright grounds - I've fixed the article but I'm not sure whether it's with you to approve or if it can be any reviewer? Any help with the next steps would be greatly appreciated.

1720:

Hey there, This submission was declined for reasons of copyright. Can you please point out the copyrighted sections? As far as I know there are no copyrighted segments in the article.

574:, no problem, it was the supervote bit (not of your comment) that got my goat. I genuinely do try to be impartial in closures and sometimes I make mistakes, but I've always considered 2499:. I can't see the issue of incorrect information raised during those discussions, if there is an incorrect statement on the page and you would like it to be changed, please submit an 4041:. Agree with your assessment on notability though and it's probably best to engage the creator and just note not to create multiple pages on the same topic in future. Many thanks, 1488: 1447: 4018:

in a discussion of procedures for new article creation. But I wanted to bring this to your attention and ask for your opinion on how to handle this end run around prior reviews. --

3824:, and as long as the editor was open, I fixed not only the bogus file option but numerous other things that would probably be difficult to assemble into a semi-automated process. — 2714:, it would also help if you re-read what I wrote. I did not and do not in any way deny your experience of misandric abuse. I am very sorry to hear that you were subjected to that. 4567:. The scope is much wider than just newspapers. The main issue is, as I have mentioned above, the overlap in personnel in the academic papers cited, meaning there is a lack of 4213:

Great, thank you being a watch dog for wiki. I tried to contribute science and being fooled for more than 6 months. Please review my talk page. Probably, I will delete this page.

5640:

for information on how to structure the biography so as to make it read more like an encyclopedia entry. Please do let me know if you require further assistance. Many thanks,

4138:

I'm not particularly proud of being an unpaid editor, per the Terms of Use, if you are a paid editor, you have to disclose that that is the case. I don't think either myself,

2117:, if there was an original it might have been deleted, but I don't seem to have tagged anything with in your userspace for deletion. Either way, you're at no risk of being 2392:. Would you mind revisiting your closing statement? (Just for the sake of completion, since a "no consensus" result is basically the same as "exclude" anyway, according to 3694:

And checking contributions, I found they same editor had done what so many do when their draft does not get accepted, and inserted it into mainspace with a variant title

1928:

PRIME Finance materials. Further modifications can be undertaken with your guidance, and if necessary a license for the materials could be obtained from PRIME Finance.

5553:

sources. I won't decline it so as to give you ample opportunity to improve it, but in its current state, the draft is on course to be declined again. Many thanks,

4276: 1597:. The standard decline templates aren't meant to comment on the notability of the topic, just the adequacy of the coverage cited in proving a claim to notability. 1961:, if you want to retrieve a copy, you'll have to contact the administrator who deleted the page. If you wish to freely license the text, you can do so through the 2495:). Before we start, are you saying that the person who opened these requested moves is associated with the company? If so, please instruct them to declare their 1806: 5270:

them to invite them to further elaborate on their rationale for you. Apologies for the delay time in responding, I have been off-wiki for a while. Many thanks,

2197:

Request to review The first two sources are simple short biographies that read like a social media bio. Please see WP:RS. SITH (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC).

3339:. I guess I assumed it was an RfC based on the unusually high participation rate. I think it would be a lot better if you reverted since you closed the request? 3291:

in March weren't mentioned in the RfC that you closed, and the participants in the prior consensus weren't pinged. Moreover, the many people who supported the

5301:

reliable sources before resubmitting. I appreciate your help in making this work. Thank you, DIANAHENDRICKS 18:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)18:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

4971:

Hi Strauss can you please rereview my article submission. I have included line item citations, and documented as many facts as I can when making assertions.

3640:, I hope you enjoyed your weekend too! Thanks for re-submitting your draft, you are correct; a reviewer will take a look at it and assess it in due course. 3250:

per your request on your behalf. I will abstain from reviewing it as technically I submitted it, but another reviewer will be with it shortly. Many thanks,

3458: 3426: 556:

I just wanted to say thank you for agreeing to relist the move. I also wanted to apologize if my comments came off as too personal. Keep up the good work.

3900:, which you created beforehand. The issue I identified still remains. It’s not about notability: I haven’t assessed that yet. The issue is that as a 3892:, apologies if the following analysis is surface-level: I’m travelling at the moment so I have to answer on my tablet. I assume you’re talking about 5463: 4794: 3216: 3143: 3080: 2618:

has anything misogynistic in his character, and I remain firmly convinced that the semantics of his statement were in no way directed at

5328:, I am not the administrator who deleted the draft and as such I cannot see it nor restore it for you. However, looking at the deletion log for 425: 135: 3787:

did not have an effect on the status of your draft. Therefore, your latest submitted version is still dated by when you re-submitted it, which

3821: 2834:, I have never suggested that there is any friendship or loyalty, indeed, in the distant past I have had my own serious issues with 3791:. I have intermittent access as I am travelling until 7 June, so it probably won't be reviewed by me, but by another reviewer. Many thanks, 3059:

Could you please provide more feedback and advise on what changes are expected to get this article approved and published on Knowledge (XXG).

3201:, thanks for your reply. I have edited the article but not able to find the re-submit option. If you can guide be it will be really helpful. 2777: 2732: 2683: 500:

And sorry if I was rude in my tone above. I appreciate that you were editing in good faith, and thanks for your help with the RM process. —

89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2204:

Also first two sources, bookmyshow.com is well known movie ticket booking site. filmibeat.com is a movie critics site, not blog mode sites.

1466: 1425: 1003: 5374:

Hi, the entry has been revised. Would you mind taking a look again, to see if you think that the issues are resolved now? Thanks so much!

5316: 4718: 4635: 4512: 4446: 4384: 4100: 1749: 2989:

Was the Steven Paul Whitsitt Article already deleted? I didn’t get time to save it. When I tried to edit it it was blank. Please advise.

909:. Please feel free to press "resubmit" on the page. As I said in my initial comment, the awards and fellowship make him notable per the 4313: 4283:) water management effort utilizing BAITSSS in Kansas. BAITSSS model was incorporated at United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ( 2469: 2017: 159: 5633: 5013: 2147:

Hello SITH I hope you are having an amazing afternoon. I have made the proper edits to the OTL Beezy Draft page that you wanted me to.

4669:(XXG)", we're advising you on how to improve the draft such that it gets included. A key part of that, for all drafts, is to include 4664:. This is why myself, Velella and Worldbruce opted to "decline" the draft as opposed to "reject" it, which means that we think it is 3521:

Thank you Anthony! SITH, there's still the issue of what to do about your close. If you want me to propose moving the article back to

3295:

move probably wouldn't support the move you made. Will you please switch back so we can sort this out? Otherwise we have to go to DR.

1946: 936: 4986: 1413: 1343: 1281: 5467: 5458:, thanks for your message. If you work for a company and receive any financial remuneration for your edits to Knowledge (XXG) you 3897: 3122:

Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction. I have worked on your inputs and resubmitted my article. Please review.

1590: 4277:

https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/water-for-plant-growth-the-foundation-of-the-global-food-supply-and-ecosystem-services/55166/

3363:

request (I closed the discussion without realising it was sysop move-protected. Anthony - please can you revert and reopen? Per

3007: 2290: 2101: 1794: 629:, many thanks for your edits, I've taken another look and the only remaining matching text is a list, and is therefore okay per 5446: 4898: 2305:, no problem, a reviewer will have a look at the draft within the time period stated on the submission template. Many thanks, 2231: 1054: 2915: 2914:, I would be in favour of reducing Legacypac's block to a fixed length provided he apologises both for the insult and for the 3721:, no worries, it was a tricky one to detect, thanks for spotting it after the ping, I'll use that method as well in future. 1738: 1513:

I understand that you completely deleted the page I've been working on re: Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D. The draft URL should be:

1200: 378:

Also, you should not have closed your own Move Review as you were the original closer of the RM. Please undo immediately. —

158:, I agree they probably need incubation. I've moved them to the draftspace per your request, the new titles can be found at 4778:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2275:

Hi Sith, Thank you so much for your help, I have removed the references we talked about and have re-submitted it. Best VC

4234:

Removed multiple citations after Comment: Undeclared WP:SELFCITE is a concern. Worldbruce (talk) 01:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

2166:, thanks for the message. A reviewer will take a look within the stated time period on the yellow template. Many thanks, 797:, thanks for your message. Would you prefer for the aforementioned ones to be denominated at a separate RM? Many thanks, 4774: 3023:

as a draft which had been considered abandoned having not been edited for six months. You can request its restoration at

2272: 956: 4783: 4564: 196:

can do it myself but I don't want to break Knowledge (XXG) policy and also the healthy conversation between the 2 of us.

5263: 3287:

This is a disaster... We had the opposite consensus after a move request in March... The reasons for the move away from

1069: 5637: 5017: 1679:

Hi, I think you should delete my draft. I don't know what to improve. The article may not be on the wiki. Thank you. --

5648: 5561: 5478: 5413: 5354: 5278: 5217: 5168: 5101: 5049: 4953: 4855: 4740: 4689: 4579: 4280: 4197: 4162: 4049: 3984: 3920: 3853: 3799: 3729: 3648: 3599: 3522: 3506: 3437: 3413: 3405: 3379: 3323: 3288: 3258: 3212: 3173: 3139: 3103: 3076: 3035: 2969: 2927: 2869: 2589: 2543: 2442: 2362: 2313: 2254: 2174: 2129: 2114: 2067: 1981: 1880: 1817: 1760: 1702: 1645: 1605: 1550: 1371: 1300: 1244: 1167: 1103: 1041: 921: 855: 805: 684: 641: 586: 532: 474: 436: 407: 341: 318: 271: 229: 170: 47: 17: 3586:

I've collapsed the closure and re-opened the discussion, the bot should add it back to the list when it next updates.

2351: 111: 110:

Sir I would like to raise a friendly request to you to do the assessment about this article which I recently created

3626: 2336: 38: 4880: 4869: 4305: 4703:

two discussions in USDA website). I feel really discouraged and stupid putting such an effort in this non-sense.

4189:, which, as you will know with your extensive journal editing, is not a very sound basis for verifying content. 4149:

on the draft, we merely applied the established policies and guidelines for content inclusion on Knowledge (XXG).

2773: 2728: 2679: 1455: 707: 658: 616: 5020:. Most often, after the lead paragraph, the table of contents for a biography should look something like this: 4938: 4351:

There, Dhungel created an intricate model that helps capture the evapotranspiration (ET) rates of various crops.

4006:

is obv. notable, though I do agree that the article needs work. I am more concerned about the process here. See

3701:

I am, obviously , quite annoyed at myself, for I should have done the check myself when it was first submitted.

3545:

Hi I just noticed this discussion about the close of the request move, do you plan on reopening the discussion?

2500: 5594: 5312: 4714: 4631: 4508: 4442: 4380: 4096: 3960: 3878: 5528: 5157: 5041:

Please let me know if you require any further assistance. Apologies for the delay in response. Many thanks,

4915: 4288: 4284: 4257: 4252: 2504: 2033: 1223: 611:

revision deletion request to redact the page history if appropriate. Just wondering where this is at? Thanks.

5466:. For general disclosures not related to paid editing, you should still disclose a conflict of interest per 2632:, for whom I genuinely have the greatest respect, will see his way clear to reducing this terrible block. 2473: 4453:

I don't believe that I mentioned Newspapers as potential sources. I am also very unclear what the statement

4035: 3240: 3208: 3162: 3135: 3072: 2390:

only gives an anonymous source for the date of the breakup, which is definitely a red flag per WP:BLPGOSSIP"

2013: 5434: 5329: 5304: 5063: 4974: 4942: 4886: 4706: 4623: 4500: 4434: 4372: 4088: 3637: 3622: 3204: 3131: 3068: 3024: 2995: 2347: 2332: 2278: 2219: 2089: 2005: 1934: 1782: 1726: 1401: 1331: 1269: 1188: 5643: 5556: 5473: 5408: 5349: 5273: 5249: 5232: 5212: 5196: 5163: 5118: 5096: 5070: 5044: 4948: 4876: 4850: 4819: 4735: 4684: 4574: 4400: 4192: 4157: 4044: 3979: 3915: 3848: 3829: 3813: 3794: 3788: 3724: 3695: 3643: 3594: 3567: 3531: 3502: 3487: 3467: 3432: 3422: 3409: 3399: 3374: 3356: 3345: 3318: 3301: 3253: 3198: 3168: 3098: 3092: 3030: 2964: 2922: 2864: 2821: 2584: 2538: 2437: 2357: 2308: 2249: 2169: 2124: 2062: 1976: 1942: 1875: 1812: 1755: 1697: 1674: 1640: 1600: 1545: 1366: 1295: 1239: 1162: 1098: 1036: 916: 902: 883: 850: 800: 703: 679: 654: 636: 626: 612: 581: 527: 469: 431: 402: 336: 313: 266: 224: 185: 165: 105: 5524: 4911: 4729: 4710: 4657: 4627: 4543: 4504: 4438: 4376: 4109: 4092: 3893: 3782: 2419: 2044: 1219: 575: 5629: 5383: 5186:

No news two months later on an article initially rejected for copyright reasons resubmitted fixing these

4982: 3753: 2808:

other connotations. The only one I have seen attempting to take Legacy's words out of context is Legacy

2611: 2465:

question or understanding from the person checking it. Please could you advise how best we can proceed?

2401: 1409: 1339: 1277: 1033:

in to provide you with the URL to avoid (I can't see it anymore as it has been redacted). Many thanks,

5542: 5259: 5245: 5206: 5192: 5093:, thank you for the improvements, I see you've resubmitted it, so a reviewer will be with it shortly. 4556: 4120: 2508: 2483:

Hi Andrew, thank you for your message. I note that two requested move discussions have been opened on

1958: 1938: 1844:

Can you tell me why you/StraussInTheHouse writes: this is contrary to the purpose of Knowledge (XXG).

1156: 5394: 5379: 4995: 4978: 4314:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=11738074413392356940&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en

4300:

Furthermore, BAITSSS model had been published in the high impact Journal like Hydrological Processes (

2113:, apologies for the delay in response. As far as I can see, the only draft of yours I've declined is 1405: 1335: 1273: 131: 3550: 3247: 3126: 3016: 3003: 2999: 2907: 2839: 2764: 2742: 2719: 2693: 2670: 2619: 2302: 2286: 2282: 2097: 1790: 1786: 1451: 5455: 5438: 5402: 4907: 4890: 3364: 2886: 2243: 2223: 2163: 2148: 1439: 5605: 5590: 5520: 5505: 5442: 5325: 5308: 4894: 4186: 4015: 4003: 3973: 3956: 3889: 3874: 2430:

until a different citation on whose reliability consensus exists (and is of the conclusion that it

2227: 2213:

Go through other sources and take a decision and post if you have any suggestions on improvements.

2152: 1730: 1684: 1527: 1361: 1131: 1084: 299: 5609: 5398: 5009: 4930: 4670: 4661: 4309: 4124: 3905: 3873:

I add reference for first section. this man is notable. can i submit it? no problem? With respect

3667: 2423: 2393: 2048: 1779:

source regarding albums? I would appreciate any helpful tips regarding my draft. All the best VC

1215: 1092: 1026: 1012: 965: 946: 913:, it was just the sourcing that needed fixing and a cursory glance looks promising! Many thanks, 310:, when I’m on PC (I’m on mobile at the moment), I’ll copy the closure statement in as a comment. 5509: 5144: 5123: 5090: 5076: 4128: 3817: 2029: 2009: 1734: 1531: 1196: 607: 5617: 5538: 4926: 4563:. Neither myself, Velella or Worldbruce said the coverage had to be in newspapers. Please see 2903: 2519:

policy, and there is an established precedent for, where supported by reliable sources, using a

2056: 1233: 1004:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:The_American_Social_History_Project/Center_for_Media_and_Learning

906: 5655: 5598: 5568: 5513: 5485: 5420: 5387: 5361: 5285: 5253: 5224: 5200: 5175: 5129: 5108: 5082: 5056: 4960: 4862: 4831: 4806: 4747: 4696: 4586: 4471: 4414: 4204: 4169: 4065: 4056: 4022: 3991: 3964: 3927: 3882: 3860: 3833: 3806: 3757: 3736: 3712: 3689: 3655: 3630: 3606: 3554: 3536: 3510: 3472: 3444: 3417: 3386: 3350: 3330: 3306: 3265: 3180: 3165:, you don't seem to have resubmitted it, do you want me to do it on your behalf? Many thanks, 3147: 3110: 3084: 3042: 2976: 2953: 2934: 2852: 2825: 2782: 2754: 2737: 2705: 2688: 2656: 2641: 2596: 2571: 2550: 2477: 2449: 2405: 2369: 2340: 2320: 2294: 2261: 2235: 2181: 2156: 2136: 2074: 2021: 1999:

could you please describe more clearly what was wrong with my article so that I may revise it?

1988: 1950: 1909: 1887: 1866: 1853: 1824: 1798: 1767: 1742: 1709: 1688: 1652: 1629: 1612: 1580: 1557: 1535: 1500: 1459: 1417: 1378: 1347: 1307: 1285: 1251: 1204: 1174: 1135: 1110: 1074: 1048: 1020: 928: 887: 862: 839: 812: 787: 711: 691: 662: 648: 620: 593: 566: 539: 509: 495: 481: 458: 443: 414: 387: 372: 348: 325: 302: 289: 278: 254: 236: 205: 177: 4827: 3838: 3825: 3772: 3577: 3526: 3462: 3368: 3340: 3312: 3296: 2848: 2831: 2817: 2750: 2701: 2637: 2567: 2520: 1016: 974: 950: 894: 879: 835: 783: 505: 491: 454: 383: 368: 123: 5613: 5531: 5401:

to the movement, the only reason I could conceive of a reviewer declining the draft would be

4918: 4674: 4568: 3768: 2512: 2036: 1962: 1515:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Daniel_K._Podolsky&action=edit&redlink=1

1226: 910: 630: 115: 4813: 4301: 3764: 3749: 2652: 2411: 2397: 1905: 1872:

Hi, I've resubmitted it on your behalf, I'll let another reviewer look at it. Many thanks,

1862: 1495: 1063: 201: 147: 5621: 5550: 5343: 5339: 4999: 4934: 4662:

a topic being non-notable such that no amount of editing can provide evidence of notability

4560: 4551: 4458: 4182: 4116: 3976:, thanks, let me know if you require any further advice on the draft before resubmission! 3901: 3842: 3778: 3360: 3020: 2890: 2496: 2415: 1966: 1841:

It has been modified over many months with input from to conform with wikipedia standards.

1594: 982: 578:, in an absence of any evidence, just to be assuming bad faith. Thanks for your message! 396: 5497: 4802: 4312:) (top 10.00% most cited articles published in Engineering in 2016, current 14 citations ( 4139: 3581: 3546: 3285:

There appears to be consensus to remove the "by Donald Trump" part of the disambiguator...

2492: 2488: 2484: 2110: 2093: 284: 260: 249: 5546: 5534: 5209:, please can you provide me with a link to the draft you're talking about? Many thanks, 5006: 4922: 4779: 4678: 4132: 2911: 2895: 2516: 2040: 1229: 1152: 1151:

last Thursday, you need to remove references to unreliable sources and replace them with

3942: 3666:

My intuition that it was copyvio was correct. It comes from the short version of his CV

2384:. I may have been too vague, but I did specifically mention BLP concerns in my comment, 399:

as the OP didn't bother coming to talk to me first, but as I say, feel free to revert.

5267: 2835: 2624: 2615: 2602: 1970: 1680: 1292:

Hi, I or another reviewer will be with it within the stated time period. Many thanks,

1142: 1127: 827: 823: 819: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 330: 307: 296: 5152: 4178: 3909: 2906:, "jerk" or "ass" would have conveyed his feelings about the issues he perceives with 2052: 139: 3708: 3685: 1625: 1576: 1211: 1192: 905:

the citations so it's easier for readers to get key data from sources and to prevent

4271:

Response: Thank you for the feedback. Removed both diagrams.Open Access Government (

5239: 4837: 4823: 4547: 4465: 4408: 4281:

https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NAA9_web-150dpi.pdf

4143: 3315:, sure, no problem, feel free to revert. I can't recall closing an RfC though... 2882: 2844: 2760: 2746: 2711: 2697: 2662: 2633: 2578: 2563: 1480: 844: 831: 794: 779: 571: 559: 514: 501: 487: 463: 450: 421: 392: 379: 364: 5462:

declare this per the Terms of Use. You can find out more about how to do this at

2354:

within the time period stated on the yellow template at the bottom. Many thanks,

1838:

This is a history of the tax law that affects a large portion of New York State.

4660:, the topic of your draft may well be notable. I don't think this is a case of 2899: 2648: 2629: 1901: 1858: 1492: 1079: 1058: 1030: 211: 197: 155: 143: 127: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5612:

aren't the issue now. I think what needs improving before you resubmit is the

4306:

https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/articles/0/0/agronj2018.10.0636

653:

Great, can you remove the "Investigation of potential copyright issue" banner?

5012:. The draft is structured quite irregularly. I advise you to take a look at 4798: 4185:, because invoking the authority of a contributor on a particular topic is an 4062: 4028: 4019: 3461:

until it's it's clear that consensus has changed from the March move request.

1666: 1589:, I did realise that, however the decline was correct and contained a link to 5523:, thanks for your message. Corporations, including football clubs, require 2902:

has alluded to above, the insult was needlessly gendered. While it's still

2000: 5616:

and structure of the draft: it reads very much live a résumé, something we

4289:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=348805

4285:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=354882

4258:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=354882

4253:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=348805

3371:'s message as a request to overturn the closure and re-open. Many thanks, 3056:

This is regarding my article 'Jag Chima', which has been rejected twice.

2858: 1832: 4326: 2188: 1185:

Hi, how can I fix my "sinyi realty inc" page to be qualified? Thank you!

3718: 3703: 3680: 2958: 2944: 2524: 1634: 1620: 1586: 1571: 822:

should be in a separate discussion from the rest. I would propose moving

4272: 3777:

appears to be a semi-automated edit using a general fixes tool, perhaps

1472: 1431: 3678:

Thanks for your ping, because I otherwise might not have looked again.

2532: 2208: 4461:

has never been an argument to accept an inadequately sourced article.

5342:, and as such it is ineligible for an automatic restoration (such as 4330: 119: 5502: 3525:

as a precondition to your amending your close, then I will do that.

2535:. Please let me know if you have any more questions! Many thanks, 5496:

It’s an authentic information & could be confirmed on website:

4497:

what you guys are exact looking. Please direct me in wiki article.

702:

comment at the top of the page from Robert McClenon? Thanks again.

5431:

HI , I am the founder of the studio I have no idea what to do ???

5375: 5368: 2857: 2528: 1053:

ashp.cuny.edu/the-911-digital-archive is the URL. You can see it

4291:) websites and its benefit is discussed in Interpretive Summary. 5334: 4310:

https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/met.1596

2877:

s reaction after logging out for a day and coming back to this.

1752:

has been cleared of copyright violations by an administrator.

333:, I've added the closing statement as a comment. Many thanks, 25: 4929:. Sources 1 is a Bloomberg database entry, which only gives 3027:

and an administrator will undelete it for you. Many thanks,

1479:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1438:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

5405:, but personally I don't think that's likely. Many thanks, 5151:

issue to this one; they say a lot about the topic but don't

4763: 4760:

Orphaned non-free image File:Fresh patch logo (cropped).jpeg

1854:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/our-work/wikimedia-projects/

1471: 1430: 5468:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI

2503:. However, it may be of use to note that Knowledge (XXG) 5242:

Hoping this gets to you somehow. Still a learning newbee.

4302:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hyp.13458

2422:

before the original closure, but I have clarified it per

138:. And also please check whether this article comply with 3019:, the draft was deleted under speedy deletion criterion 2515:. Requests to change article titles should be based on 5498:

https://www.footballdelhi.com/division/senior-division/

4011: 4007: 3845:, I too am a real person but I also use AWB! Regards, 3336: 2813: 2809: 2804: 2385: 2381: 1593:

which explains the reason we need something other than

1514: 1147: 990: 986: 978: 970: 4131:, but not an article in itself. For that, we require 4061:

I concur. I'll followup on the page creator's talk. --

1965:

process. Furthermore, you will need to disclose your

1931:

Thank you for any further direction you can provide.

214:, no problem, you can move them back if you want to. 5240:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Frenchtown,_Washington

4133:

significant coverage in independent, reliable sources

935:

Request on 14:05:33, 16 April 2019 for assistance on

5638:

Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style#Section organization

5262:, no problem, we were all newbies once! I declined 5018:

Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style#Section organization

1159:, such as citations 1, 15, 16 and 21. Many thanks, 4879:, a couple of months ago you reviewed and rejected 778:

were not moved in accordance with this consensus.--

4793:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 3771:. Please note that your draft wasn't reviewed by 3457:I agree with SITH, the idea is to revert back to 2601:I just happen to be extremely familiar with 1667:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Radoslav_Rochallyi 1637:, fair enough, I'll bear that in mind in future. 2001:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ponos_Corporation 1002:Hello! I'm contacting you regarding this page: 2523:as opposed to a brand name. Examples include: 1833:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:S7000A_(tax_law) 4795:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4789:Note that any non-free images not used in any 2763:, again, two wrongs don't make a right etc. -- 2189:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Vini_Vishwa_Lal 1591:Knowledge (XXG):No original research#Secondary 160:User:StraussInTheHouse/Draftify log#April 2019 3898:Draft:I'm writing about something close to me 2350:, thank you! A reviewer will take a look at 8: 5464:Knowledge (XXG):Paid-contribution disclosure 1852:Is it better placed in a wikimedia project? 5543:existence is not an indicator of notability 4455:"wiki is a chronological list of newspaper" 4117:Knowledge (XXG) isn't for original research 3459:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump) 3429:was the original title IIRC. Many thanks, 3427:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump) 1487:redirect, you might want to participate in 1446:redirect, you might want to participate in 5432: 5302: 4972: 4884: 4704: 4621: 4498: 4432: 4370: 4112:, it's unfortunate that you feel that way. 4086: 3767:, I can confirm that your draft is in the 3202: 3129: 3066: 2993: 2414:, thank you for your message. I reviewed 2276: 2217: 2087: 2051:coverage for its content to be considered 2003: 1932: 1780: 1724: 1483:. Since you had some involvement with the 1442:. Since you had some involvement with the 1399: 1329: 1267: 1186: 426:Knowledge (XXG):Move review/Log/2019 April 5545:. Since the review, you have only added 3359:as the admin who actioned the subsequent 3062:Any pointers will be highly appreciated. 2456:How do we go about correcting an article? 1716:Submission declined to Anna and Elizabeth 5376:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:5050x2020 5369:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:5050x2020 4327:https://www.aaas.org/pes/how-we-respond 3408:. What do you want me to rename it as? 2055:or the company itself to be considered 5634:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Layout 5625: 5158:Knowledge (XXG) isn't LinkedIn or IMDb 5014:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Layout 4146: 4127:on the main topic page, in this case, 3284: 2961:, many thanks for the support. Best, 2207:You can very well search the object - 2118: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5403:on the question of lasting notability 4840:, oops! Thanks for sorting that out 4273:https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/ 606:Hi there, you recently flagged a the 7: 5630:#Hobbies and charitable associations 4841: 4775:File:Fresh patch logo (cropped).jpeg 4571:in the cited sources. Many thanks, 2273:Draft:Philip_Morgan_Lewis_(Musician) 2209:https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4921102/ 1750:Draft:Anna and Elizabeth (musicians) 518: 215: 4014:. My preference would be to engage 5620:. I suggest starting by removing 5492:Please approve Delhi Football Club 4331:https://ucowr.org/2019-conference/ 4308:) and Meterological Applications ( 2434:reliable) is given. Many thanks, 1809:, I don't think so. Many thanks, 1805:Hi, thanks for your message. Per 486:Thanks, I've reopened the MRV. — 136:ABCD – American Born Confused Desi 24: 5503:https://www.delhifootballclub.com 4008:this removal of prior AfC reviews 1328:What is the stated time? Best. 1095:, that was the URL in question. 4842: 4565:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 4342:From 1700 word report from AAAS: 3998:Draft:Astrometric solving review 3941: 3493: 2380:Greetings. Thanks for assessing 2115:User:Nimita1989/Doctor in Jaipur 1506:Page deleted: Daniel K. Podolsky 1083: 717:Defunct radio station page moves 668: 519: 216: 29: 5427:Draft:Anti-Gravity Game Studios 5296:WP: Refund re: Jaston Williams 4925:sources is needed to establish 2043:sources which give the company 112:Boss – Baap of Special Services 5622:emotive or subjective language 4275:) had contacted and featured ( 3769:drafts pending review category 2119:banned from the Wiki Community 1214:, you need to ensure you cite 1: 4881:Draft: Autoscribe Informatics 4870:Draft: Autoscribe Informatics 4784:our policy for non-free media 4183:independent, reliable sources 1155:, especially those which are 911:academic notability guideline 5632:, and then taking a look at 5264:Draft:Frenchtown, Washington 3902:biography of a living person 3869:Shahbaz Zaman page submition 1126:mentioning their noteworthy? 4943:user-generated content page 4325:Similarly, How we respond ( 3523:Spygate (conspiracy theory) 3406:Spygate (conspiracy theory) 3289:Spygate (conspiracy theory) 2513:balanced, neutral viewpoint 897:, those edits have made it 517:, no problem. Many thanks 18:User talk:StraussInTheHouse 5672: 4937:. Sources 3, 4 and 5 are 4012:mainspace article creation 3955:thanks for your editions. 3743:Draft:Sedimentary Isostasy 3631:20:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3607:20:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3572:many thanks for your help. 3555:20:51, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3537:20:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3511:20:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3473:15:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3445:14:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3418:13:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3387:11:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3351:21:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 3331:21:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 3307:21:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 3266:11:26, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 3181:19:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 3148:07:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC) 3111:14:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 3085:06:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 3043:11:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 2977:11:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 2954:00:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 2935:11:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2853:05:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2826:05:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2814:defensive rationalizations 2783:02:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2755:02:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2738:02:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2706:01:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2689:01:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2657:00:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2642:00:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2597:16:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 2572:13:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 2551:20:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2478:15:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 2450:11:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 2406:03:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 2370:19:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2341:19:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 2321:19:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2295:17:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 2262:19:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2236:12:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 2182:19:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2157:14:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 2137:19:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2075:12:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 2032:, the draft does not cite 2022:21:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC) 1995:Why was myarticle declined 1989:12:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 1951:15:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1910:13:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1888:12:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1867:18:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 1825:12:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1799:12:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 1768:12:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1743:14:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC) 1710:12:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1689:13:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC) 1653:12:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1630:18:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1613:12:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1581:00:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1558:12:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1536:18:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 1501:21:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 1460:12:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 1418:22:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1398:Thank you for your time. 1379:18:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC) 1348:18:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC) 1252:12:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1205:00:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 1175:14:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 1136:14:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 1111:10:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 1075:03:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 1049:14:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 1021:14:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 929:10:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 888:22:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 863:10:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 840:08:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 813:07:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 788:23:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 712:22:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 692:18:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 663:18:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 594:13:59, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 567:13:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 540:14:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 510:14:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 496:14:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 482:13:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 459:13:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 444:13:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 415:13:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 388:13:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 373:13:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 349:10:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 326:21:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 303:21:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 290:18:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 283:Thank you for doing that. 279:18:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 255:17:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 237:18:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 206:16:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 178:16:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC) 4967:/* Draft: Hans Baldauf */ 4764: 4559:, or consider one of the 3940: 3404:The page is currently at 1424:Portal:English listed at 1308:18:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC) 1286:18:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC) 1091:. Thanks for the help. 649:18:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC) 621:18:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC) 5656:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5599:05:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC) 5569:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5514:03:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC) 5486:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5421:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5388:06:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC) 5362:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5286:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5254:16:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 5225:11:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 5201:16:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 5176:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 5156:content to be written. 5130:15:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 5109:11:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 5083:20:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 5057:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 4961:10:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 4927:notability for a company 4863:21:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 4832:21:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 4807:02:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 4748:11:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 4697:16:26, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 4587:09:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 4066:16:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 4057:16:19, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 4023:14:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 4002:In my opinion the topic 3992:16:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3965:13:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3335:Oh you're right, it was 3049:Jag Chima Article Advise 1694:I've tagged it per G7. 1467:Redirects for discussion 1426:Redirects for discussion 5537:sources to demonstrate 4681:sources. Many thanks, 4472:15:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 4415:14:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 4205:13:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 4170:13:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 3928:09:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 3883:22:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 3861:10:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC) 3834:05:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC) 3807:14:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC) 3758:11:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 3737:14:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC) 3713:02:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC) 3690:02:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC) 3656:14:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC) 1491:if you wish to do so. 1489:the redirect discussion 1465:Template:Cmt listed at 1450:if you wish to do so. 1448:the redirect discussion 5579:Hi StraussInTheHouse, 4769: 4078:Hi StraussInTheHouse, 3789:appears to be 28 March 3125:Here is the article - 2878: 1595:self-published sources 1476: 1435: 873:Draft:Stephen_Buckland 5583:to be all online: --> 5330:Draft:Jaston Williams 5117:Hi StraussInTheHouse, 5069:Hi StraussInTheHouse, 5064:Draft:Madhu Guruswamy 5034:Selected publications 4772:Thanks for uploading 4767: 4125:worthy of a paragraph 3949:The Original Barnstar 2861: 1475: 1434: 939:submission by Jampiaw 42:of past discussions. 5399:significant coverage 4820:Round and round I go 4671:significant coverage 4552:other stuff existing 4121:overlap in personnel 4010:that coincided with 3696:Michael J. Wingfield 2509:is not for promotion 2497:conflict of interest 1967:conflict of interest 1723:Thank you Giladsom 1234:corporate notability 1216:significant coverage 4187:appeal to authority 4016:User talk:Han.k1959 4004:Astrometric solving 3934:A barnstar for you! 3894:Draft:Shahbaz Zaman 3243:, no problem, I've 2468:Kind regards Andrew 2376:Suki Waterhouse RfC 1362:Template:AFC status 1258:Draft: Hans Baldauf 901:better. I've just 602:Draft: Jan Peterson 5575:Draft:Todd Hiscock 5119:@StraussInTheHouse 5071:@StraussInTheHouse 5005:be backed up by a 4770: 4459:other stuff exists 4129:evapotranspiration 3822:bogus file options 2879: 2511:, as we aim for a 2216:Thanks EastIndio 2086:Thanks in Advance 1477: 1436: 5525:in-depth coverage 5450: 5437:comment added by 5332:, I can see that 5320: 5307:comment added by 5233:StraussInTheHouse 4990: 4977:comment added by 4941:. Source 6 is a 4912:In-depth coverage 4902: 4889:comment added by 4877:StraussInTheHouse 4780:claim of fair use 4722: 4709:comment added by 4639: 4626:comment added by 4516: 4503:comment added by 4450: 4437:comment added by 4401:StraussInTheHouse 4388: 4375:comment added by 4222:Form my talk page 4104: 4091:comment added by 3970: 3969: 3814:StraussInTheHouse 3568:Anthony Appleyard 3535: 3503:Anthony Appleyard 3488:Anthony Appleyard 3471: 3423:Anthony Appleyard 3410:Anthony Appleyard 3400:StraussInTheHouse 3365:closing procedure 3357:Anthony Appleyard 3349: 3337:this move request 3305: 3241:Gaurav Dhingra PG 3220: 3209:Gaurav Dhingra PG 3207:comment added by 3199:StraussInTheHouse 3163:Gaurav Dhingra PG 3150: 3136:Gaurav Dhingra PG 3134:comment added by 3087: 3073:Gaurav Dhingra PG 3071:comment added by 3011: 2998:comment added by 2781: 2736: 2687: 2297: 2281:comment added by 2238: 2222:comment added by 2105: 2092:comment added by 2081:Draft: Nimita1989 2024: 2008:comment added by 1953: 1937:comment added by 1801: 1785:comment added by 1745: 1729:comment added by 1675:StraussInTheHouse 1420: 1404:comment added by 1350: 1334:comment added by 1288: 1272:comment added by 1207: 1191:comment added by 1073: 288: 253: 186:StraussInTheHouse 124:Sab Kushal Mangal 106:StraussInTheHouse 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5663: 5653: 5651: 5646: 5610:inline citations 5566: 5564: 5559: 5483: 5481: 5476: 5470:. Many thanks, 5418: 5416: 5411: 5359: 5357: 5352: 5337: 5283: 5281: 5276: 5236: 5222: 5220: 5215: 5173: 5171: 5166: 5126: 5106: 5104: 5099: 5079: 5054: 5052: 5047: 4958: 4956: 4951: 4860: 4858: 4853: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4814:Going in Circles 4766: 4745: 4743: 4738: 4694: 4692: 4687: 4584: 4582: 4577: 4470: 4413: 4243:Added citations: 4202: 4200: 4195: 4167: 4165: 4160: 4054: 4052: 4047: 4040: 4034: 3989: 3987: 3982: 3945: 3938: 3937: 3925: 3923: 3918: 3906:inline citations 3858: 3856: 3851: 3804: 3802: 3797: 3734: 3732: 3727: 3653: 3651: 3646: 3638:Nineminutesuntil 3623:Nineminutesuntil 3604: 3602: 3597: 3585: 3571: 3529: 3501: 3497: 3496: 3491: 3465: 3442: 3440: 3435: 3403: 3384: 3382: 3377: 3343: 3328: 3326: 3321: 3299: 3263: 3261: 3256: 3178: 3176: 3171: 3108: 3106: 3101: 3040: 3038: 3033: 2974: 2972: 2967: 2952: 2932: 2930: 2925: 2874: 2872: 2867: 2772: 2770: 2768: 2727: 2725: 2723: 2678: 2676: 2674: 2594: 2592: 2587: 2548: 2546: 2541: 2447: 2445: 2440: 2367: 2365: 2360: 2348:Nineminutesuntil 2333:Nineminutesuntil 2318: 2316: 2311: 2259: 2257: 2252: 2179: 2177: 2172: 2134: 2132: 2127: 2072: 2070: 2065: 2059:. Many thanks, 1986: 1984: 1979: 1973:. Many thanks, 1885: 1883: 1878: 1822: 1820: 1815: 1765: 1763: 1758: 1707: 1705: 1700: 1678: 1650: 1648: 1643: 1610: 1608: 1603: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1376: 1374: 1369: 1305: 1303: 1298: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1232:sources to show 1220:reasonable depth 1181:Sinyi Realty Inc 1172: 1170: 1165: 1157:self-referential 1153:reliable sources 1150: 1108: 1106: 1101: 1087: 1061: 1046: 1044: 1039: 995: 994: 926: 924: 919: 860: 858: 853: 810: 808: 803: 689: 687: 682: 676: 672: 671: 646: 644: 639: 591: 589: 584: 564: 562: 537: 535: 530: 524: 523: 522: 479: 477: 472: 441: 439: 434: 412: 410: 405: 346: 344: 339: 323: 321: 316: 287: 276: 274: 269: 252: 234: 232: 227: 221: 220: 219: 189: 175: 173: 168: 162:. Many thanks, 132:Sridevi Bungalow 109: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5671: 5670: 5666: 5665: 5664: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5649: 5644: 5642: 5577: 5562: 5557: 5555: 5494: 5479: 5474: 5472: 5429: 5414: 5409: 5407: 5372: 5355: 5350: 5348: 5338:deleted it per 5333: 5298: 5279: 5274: 5272: 5230: 5218: 5213: 5211: 5188: 5169: 5164: 5162: 5124: 5102: 5097: 5095: 5077: 5067: 5050: 5045: 5043: 5010:inline citation 4969: 4954: 4949: 4947: 4933:. Source 2 is 4873: 4856: 4851: 4849: 4843: 4817: 4797:. Thank you. -- 4762: 4741: 4736: 4734: 4690: 4685: 4683: 4580: 4575: 4573: 4462: 4405: 4198: 4193: 4191: 4181:in the form of 4163: 4158: 4156: 4115:Unfortunately, 4076: 4050: 4045: 4043: 4038: 4032: 4000: 3985: 3980: 3978: 3936: 3921: 3916: 3914: 3871: 3854: 3849: 3847: 3800: 3795: 3793: 3779:AutoWikiBrowser 3745: 3730: 3725: 3723: 3664: 3649: 3644: 3642: 3619: 3600: 3595: 3593: 3575: 3565: 3494: 3492: 3485: 3438: 3433: 3431: 3397: 3380: 3375: 3373: 3367:, I'm treating 3324: 3319: 3317: 3282: 3259: 3254: 3252: 3248:Draft:Jag Chima 3174: 3169: 3167: 3127:Draft:Jag_Chima 3104: 3099: 3097: 3051: 3036: 3031: 3029: 2987: 2970: 2965: 2963: 2943: 2928: 2923: 2921: 2916:aspersions cast 2908:BrownHairedGirl 2870: 2865: 2863: 2845:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2843:fellow admins. 2840:BrownHairedGirl 2766: 2765: 2747:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2743:BrownHairedGirl 2721: 2720: 2698:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2694:BrownHairedGirl 2672: 2671: 2634:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2620:BrownHairedGirl 2590: 2585: 2583: 2564:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2559: 2544: 2539: 2537: 2517:article titling 2505:is not censored 2485:Talk:Broccolini 2458: 2443: 2438: 2436: 2382:this recent RfC 2378: 2363: 2358: 2356: 2329: 2314: 2309: 2307: 2270: 2255: 2250: 2248: 2192: 2175: 2170: 2168: 2145: 2130: 2125: 2123: 2083: 2068: 2063: 2061: 1997: 1982: 1977: 1975: 1922: 1881: 1876: 1874: 1836: 1818: 1813: 1811: 1776: 1761: 1756: 1754: 1718: 1703: 1698: 1696: 1672: 1670: 1646: 1641: 1639: 1606: 1601: 1599: 1566: 1551: 1546: 1544: 1508: 1498: 1470: 1452:UnitedStatesian 1429: 1372: 1367: 1365: 1301: 1296: 1294: 1262:Hello Strauss, 1260: 1245: 1240: 1238: 1183: 1168: 1163: 1161: 1146: 1123: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1042: 1037: 1035: 968: 964: 941: 922: 917: 915: 875: 856: 851: 849: 806: 801: 799: 719: 704:VanIslander1234 685: 680: 678: 669: 667: 655:VanIslander1234 642: 637: 635: 627:VanIslander1234 613:VanIslander1234 604: 587: 582: 580: 560: 558: 533: 528: 526: 520: 475: 470: 468: 437: 432: 430: 408: 403: 401: 361: 342: 337: 335: 319: 314: 312: 272: 267: 265: 245: 230: 225: 223: 217: 183: 171: 166: 164: 103: 100: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5669: 5667: 5659: 5658: 5606:Marcela McLeod 5591:Marcela McLeod 5576: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5547:external links 5493: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5428: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5371: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5326:Dianahendricks 5309:Dianahendricks 5297: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5243: 5187: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5112: 5111: 5066: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5032: 5029: 5026: 4968: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4939:press releases 4872: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4816: 4810: 4761: 4758: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4730:129.130.88.169 4724: 4723: 4711:129.130.88.169 4658:129.130.88.169 4655: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4628:129.130.88.169 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4544:129.130.88.169 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4505:129.130.88.169 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4439:129.130.88.169 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4377:129.130.88.169 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4265: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4255: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4228: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4208: 4207: 4172: 4153: 4150: 4136: 4113: 4110:129.130.88.169 4093:129.130.88.169 4075: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4036:R with history 3999: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3974:Omid ahmadyani 3968: 3967: 3957:Omid ahmadyani 3952: 3951: 3946: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3904:, it requires 3890:Omid ahmadyani 3875:Omid ahmadyani 3870: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3810: 3809: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3676: 3675: 3663: 3662:Mike Wingfield 3660: 3659: 3658: 3618: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3588: 3587: 3573: 3558: 3557: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3281: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3123: 3120: 3114: 3113: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3045: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2938: 2937: 2856: 2855: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2715: 2666: 2623:these issues. 2558: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1921: 1920:Jeffrey Golden 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1899: 1891: 1890: 1851: 1835: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1717: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1669: 1664: 1662: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1510:Good morning, 1507: 1504: 1496: 1469: 1463: 1444:Portal:English 1440:Portal:English 1428: 1422: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1313: 1311: 1310: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1029:, I'm pinging 1001: 999: 998: 997: 996: 962: 940: 933: 932: 931: 874: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 828:WDND (1490 AM) 824:WPNT (Indiana) 820:WPNT (Indiana) 776:WGLI (defunct) 772:WDCR (defunct) 768:WCUG (defunct) 764:WCKL (defunct) 760:WCFI (defunct) 756:WAST (defunct) 752:WARI (defunct) 748:WAGL (defunct) 744:KSOS (defunct) 740:KOTN (defunct) 736:KCLS (defunct) 732:KCLA (defunct) 728:WCFJ (defunct) 724:WPNT (Indiana) 718: 715: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 603: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 419: 418: 417: 360: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 328: 292: 244: 241: 240: 239: 193: 192: 191: 190: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5668: 5657: 5654: 5652: 5647: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5627: 5623: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5585: 5580: 5574: 5570: 5567: 5565: 5560: 5552: 5548: 5544: 5540: 5536: 5533: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5511: 5507: 5504: 5500: 5499: 5491: 5487: 5484: 5482: 5477: 5469: 5465: 5461: 5457: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5426: 5422: 5419: 5417: 5412: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5377: 5370: 5367: 5363: 5360: 5358: 5353: 5345: 5341: 5336: 5331: 5327: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5318: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5295: 5287: 5284: 5282: 5277: 5269: 5265: 5261: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5244: 5241: 5234: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5223: 5221: 5216: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5185: 5177: 5174: 5172: 5167: 5159: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5145:Playlikeastar 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5132: 5131: 5127: 5125:Playlikeastar 5120: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5110: 5107: 5105: 5100: 5092: 5091:Playlikeastar 5088: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5080: 5078:Playlikeastar 5073: 5072: 5065: 5062: 5058: 5055: 5053: 5048: 5040: 5033: 5031:Personal life 5030: 5027: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5008: 5004: 5001: 5000:living people 4997: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4966: 4962: 4959: 4957: 4952: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4928: 4924: 4920: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4882: 4878: 4871: 4868: 4864: 4861: 4859: 4854: 4839: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4815: 4811: 4809: 4808: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4787: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4759: 4757: 4749: 4746: 4744: 4739: 4731: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4708: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4695: 4693: 4688: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4588: 4585: 4583: 4578: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4473: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4451: 4448: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4416: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4402: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4374: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4332: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4304:), Agronomy ( 4303: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4259: 4256: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4196: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4173: 4171: 4168: 4166: 4161: 4154: 4151: 4148: 4147:put own view 4145: 4141: 4137: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4111: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4083: 4079: 4074:Draft BAITSSS 4073: 4067: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4055: 4053: 4048: 4037: 4030: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3997: 3993: 3990: 3988: 3983: 3975: 3972: 3971: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3953: 3950: 3947: 3944: 3939: 3933: 3929: 3926: 3924: 3919: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3868: 3862: 3859: 3857: 3852: 3844: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3812: 3811: 3808: 3805: 3803: 3798: 3790: 3786: 3784: 3780: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3742: 3738: 3735: 3733: 3728: 3720: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3705: 3699: 3697: 3692: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3668: 3661: 3657: 3654: 3652: 3647: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3617:Plot Accepted 3616: 3608: 3605: 3603: 3598: 3590: 3589: 3583: 3579: 3574: 3569: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3543: 3538: 3533: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3489: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3474: 3469: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3446: 3443: 3441: 3436: 3428: 3424: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3401: 3396: 3395: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3378: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3347: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3322: 3314: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3303: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3279: 3267: 3264: 3262: 3257: 3249: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3182: 3179: 3177: 3172: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3128: 3124: 3121: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3102: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3063: 3060: 3057: 3054: 3048: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3034: 3026: 3025:WP:REFUND/G13 3022: 3018: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2990: 2984: 2978: 2975: 2973: 2968: 2960: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2949: 2948: 2940: 2939: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2926: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2881: 2880: 2876: 2873: 2868: 2860: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2806: 2784: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2626: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2593: 2588: 2580: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2542: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2470:5.104.193.178 2466: 2462: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2441: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2389: 2383: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2361: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2312: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2274: 2267: 2263: 2260: 2258: 2253: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2205: 2202: 2198: 2195: 2190: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2178: 2173: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2142: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2128: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2066: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2030:BattleCatsBro 2027: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010:BattleCatsBro 2007: 2002: 1994: 1990: 1987: 1985: 1980: 1972: 1971:your userpage 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1929: 1925: 1919: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1879: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1816: 1808: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1759: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1721: 1715: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1701: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1676: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1644: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1604: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1563: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1549: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1474: 1468: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1433: 1427: 1423: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1370: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1299: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1263: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1243: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1166: 1158: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1121:Draft Article 1120: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1102: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1045: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 967: 963: 961: 960: 958: 955: 952: 948: 945: 944: 943: 938: 934: 930: 927: 925: 920: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 881: 872: 864: 861: 859: 854: 846: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 816: 815: 814: 811: 809: 804: 796: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 716: 714: 713: 709: 705: 693: 690: 688: 683: 675: 666: 665: 664: 660: 656: 652: 651: 650: 647: 645: 640: 632: 628: 625: 624: 623: 622: 618: 614: 609: 601: 595: 592: 590: 585: 577: 573: 570: 569: 568: 565: 563: 555: 554: 541: 538: 536: 531: 516: 513: 512: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 493: 489: 485: 484: 483: 480: 478: 473: 465: 462: 461: 460: 456: 452: 447: 446: 445: 442: 440: 435: 427: 423: 420: 416: 413: 411: 406: 398: 394: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 358: 350: 347: 345: 340: 332: 329: 327: 324: 322: 317: 309: 306: 305: 304: 301: 298: 293: 291: 286: 282: 281: 280: 277: 275: 270: 262: 259: 258: 257: 256: 251: 242: 238: 235: 233: 228: 213: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 187: 181: 180: 179: 176: 174: 169: 161: 157: 153: 152: 151: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 107: 97: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5641: 5618:aim to avoid 5589: 5586: 5581: 5578: 5554: 5501: 5495: 5471: 5459: 5433:— Preceding 5430: 5406: 5373: 5347: 5303:— Preceding 5299: 5271: 5260:LeCanardQuoi 5246:LeCanardQuoi 5210: 5207:LeCanardQuoi 5193:LeCanardQuoi 5189: 5161: 5148: 5128: 5094: 5081: 5074: 5068: 5042: 5002: 4973:— Preceding 4970: 4946: 4885:— Preceding 4874: 4848: 4818: 4790: 4788: 4773: 4771: 4754: 4733: 4705:— Preceding 4682: 4665: 4656: 4622:— Preceding 4572: 4569:independence 4561:alternatives 4499:— Preceding 4464: 4463: 4454: 4433:— Preceding 4407: 4406: 4371:— Preceding 4264: 4227: 4190: 4179:verification 4174: 4155: 4152:Many thanks, 4123:is probably 4087:— Preceding 4084: 4080: 4077: 4042: 4001: 3977: 3948: 3913: 3872: 3846: 3839:Anomalocaris 3826:Anomalocaris 3792: 3776: 3775:, that edit 3773:Anomalocaris 3746: 3722: 3702: 3700: 3693: 3679: 3677: 3665: 3641: 3620: 3592: 3578:Ahrtoodeetoo 3498: 3430: 3372: 3369:Ahrtoodeetoo 3355:I'm pinging 3316: 3313:Ahrtoodeetoo 3292: 3283: 3251: 3244: 3203:— Preceding 3166: 3130:— Preceding 3096: 3067:— Preceding 3064: 3061: 3058: 3055: 3052: 3028: 2994:— Preceding 2991: 2988: 2962: 2946: 2945: 2920: 2862: 2832:Newimpartial 2818:Newimpartial 2801: 2628:good friend 2606: 2582: 2560: 2536: 2521:generic name 2501:edit request 2467: 2463: 2459: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2396:.) Thanks. — 2387: 2379: 2355: 2330: 2306: 2277:— Preceding 2271: 2247: 2218:— Preceding 2215: 2212: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2167: 2146: 2122: 2088:— Preceding 2084: 2060: 2004:— Preceding 1998: 1974: 1959:PRiMEFiNANCE 1939:PRiMEFiNANCE 1933:— Preceding 1930: 1926: 1923: 1898:Many Thanks, 1873: 1857: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1810: 1781:— Preceding 1777: 1753: 1725:— Preceding 1722: 1719: 1695: 1671: 1661: 1638: 1619: 1598: 1570: 1567: 1543: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1512: 1509: 1497:has returned 1485:Template:Cmt 1484: 1481:Template:Cmt 1478: 1443: 1437: 1400:— Preceding 1397: 1364: 1330:— Preceding 1312: 1293: 1268:— Preceding 1264: 1261: 1237: 1187:— Preceding 1184: 1160: 1124: 1096: 1088: 1066: 1034: 1011: 1007: 1000: 966:User:Jampiaw 953: 942: 914: 898: 895:LowlanderToo 880:LowlanderToo 876: 848: 798: 720: 700: 677: 673: 634: 608:Jan Peterson 605: 579: 576:WP:SUPERVOTE 557: 525: 467: 429: 400: 362: 334: 311: 264: 246: 222: 194: 163: 101: 78: 43: 37: 5626:Thankfully, 5587:Thank you. 5532:independent 5395:PetraPetraK 5380:PetraPetraK 4996:PeterMa1234 4979:PeterMa1234 4919:independent 4675:independent 4666:potentially 3765:Geologician 3750:Geologician 3245:resubmitted 3053:Hello Sir, 2985:SPW Article 2412:Sangdeboeuf 2398:Sangdeboeuf 2327:Plot Review 2049:significant 2037:independent 1774:Re Draft - 1564:Placeholder 1406:PeterMa1234 1336:PeterMa1234 1319:Hi Strauss, 1274:PeterMa1234 1227:independent 182:Hello sir, 128:Section 375 102:Hello sir, 98:Help needed 36:This is an 5624:, such as 5551:affiliated 5539:notability 5025:Early life 4935:affiliated 4931:statistics 4812:Ya got me 4399:Apologies 4140:Worldbruce 3818:lint error 3582:PackMecEng 3547:PackMecEng 3017:Aerlenbach 3000:Aerlenbach 2992:Thank you 2769:HairedGirl 2724:HairedGirl 2675:HairedGirl 2352:your draft 2303:VCMatthews 2283:VCMatthews 2111:Nimita1989 2094:Nimita1989 2053:verifiable 1831:Regarding 1787:VCMatthews 1493:* Pppery * 1148:my comment 1089:Self-trout 261:SlimVirgin 5456:Snakemkii 5439:Snakemkii 4908:Andycld91 4891:Andycld91 3783:WPCleaner 3591:Regards, 3091:Answered 2836:Legacypac 2625:Legacypac 2616:Legacypac 2603:Legacypac 2420:BLPGOSSIP 2244:Eastindio 2224:Eastindio 2164:Ronald337 2149:Ronald337 1681:Tattinger 1143:Kendollb3 1128:Kendollb3 903:filled in 331:Netoholic 308:Netoholic 297:Netoholic 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 5535:reliable 5529:multiple 5521:Bs mehra 5506:Bs mehra 5447:contribs 5435:unsigned 5335:RHaworth 5317:contribs 5305:unsigned 5149:opposite 5007:reliable 4987:contribs 4975:unsigned 4923:reliable 4916:multiple 4899:contribs 4887:unsigned 4791:articles 4719:contribs 4707:unsigned 4679:reliable 4636:contribs 4624:unsigned 4557:deletion 4513:contribs 4501:unsigned 4447:contribs 4435:unsigned 4385:contribs 4373:unsigned 4101:contribs 4089:unsigned 4085:Thanks. 3820:of type 3293:proposed 3217:contribs 3205:unsigned 3144:contribs 3132:unsigned 3081:contribs 3069:unsigned 3065:Thanks 3008:contribs 2996:unsigned 2778:contribs 2733:contribs 2684:contribs 2525:Dumpster 2291:contribs 2279:unsigned 2268:RE Draft 2232:contribs 2220:unsigned 2102:contribs 2090:unsigned 2045:in-depth 2041:reliable 2018:contribs 2006:unsigned 1947:contribs 1935:unsigned 1795:contribs 1783:unsigned 1739:contribs 1731:Giladsom 1727:unsigned 1528:Kshear04 1526:Thanks, 1414:contribs 1402:unsigned 1344:contribs 1332:unsigned 1282:contribs 1270:unsigned 1230:reliable 1224:multiple 1212:Wtchenry 1201:contribs 1193:Wtchenry 1189:unsigned 957:contribs 907:link rot 243:Chairman 5268:pinging 5229:Thanks 4838:Wbm1058 4824:wbm1058 4548:Velella 4466:Velella 4409:Velella 4144:Velella 3280:Spygate 2904:uncivil 2898:and as 2887:ACTRIAL 2883:Kudpung 2810:himself 2761:Kudpung 2712:Kudpung 2663:Kudpung 2579:Kudpung 2533:Thermos 2428:removed 2057:notable 1093:Jampiaw 1027:Jampiaw 1013:Jampiaw 979:history 947:Jampiaw 845:Tdl1060 832:Tdl1060 795:Tdl1060 780:Tdl1060 631:WP:NFCC 572:Calidum 561:Calidum 515:Amakuru 502:Amakuru 488:Amakuru 464:Amakuru 451:Amakuru 422:Amakuru 393:Amakuru 380:Amakuru 365:Amakuru 285:SarahSV 250:SarahSV 116:Firrkie 39:archive 5650:(talk) 5563:(talk) 5480:(talk) 5415:(talk) 5356:(talk) 5280:(talk) 5219:(talk) 5170:(talk) 5153:verify 5103:(talk) 5051:(talk) 5028:Career 4955:(talk) 4857:(talk) 4742:(talk) 4691:(talk) 4581:(talk) 4550:says, 4199:(talk) 4164:(talk) 4051:(talk) 3986:(talk) 3922:(talk) 3910:verify 3896:, not 3855:(talk) 3801:(talk) 3785:, and 3731:(talk) 3650:(talk) 3601:(talk) 3439:(talk) 3381:(talk) 3325:(talk) 3260:(talk) 3175:(talk) 3119:Hello, 3105:(talk) 3037:(talk) 2971:(talk) 2929:(talk) 2900:Drmies 2871:(talk) 2774:(talk) 2729:(talk) 2680:(talk) 2649:Drmies 2630:Drmies 2591:(talk) 2545:(talk) 2444:(talk) 2424:ARBBLP 2394:ARBBLP 2388:People 2364:(talk) 2315:(talk) 2256:(talk) 2176:(talk) 2143:Review 2131:(talk) 2069:(talk) 2034:enough 1983:(talk) 1902:Ryozzo 1882:(talk) 1859:Ryozzo 1819:(talk) 1762:(talk) 1704:(talk) 1647:(talk) 1607:(talk) 1552:(talk) 1392:facts. 1373:(talk) 1302:(talk) 1246:(talk) 1169:(talk) 1145:, per 1105:(talk) 1080:JJMC89 1059:JJMC89 1043:(talk) 1031:JJMC89 923:(talk) 857:(talk) 807:(talk) 774:, and 686:(talk) 643:(talk) 588:(talk) 534:(talk) 476:(talk) 438:(talk) 424:, per 409:(talk) 343:(talk) 320:(talk) 273:(talk) 231:(talk) 212:AR.Dmg 198:AR.Dmg 172:(talk) 156:AR.Dmg 144:AR.Dmg 120:I M 24 4799:B-bot 4546:, as 4063:mikeu 4029:Mu301 4020:mikeu 3709:talk 3686:talk 3532:bleep 3468:bleep 3346:bleep 3302:bleep 2767:Brown 2722:Brown 2673:Brown 2607:Bitch 2529:Q-Tip 1626:talk 1577:talk 1218:of a 987:watch 983:links 359:Hey?! 16:< 5645:SITH 5636:and 5614:tone 5595:talk 5558:SITH 5510:talk 5475:SITH 5460:must 5443:talk 5410:SITH 5384:talk 5378:P. 5351:SITH 5313:talk 5275:SITH 5250:talk 5214:SITH 5197:talk 5165:SITH 5098:SITH 5046:SITH 5016:and 5003:must 4983:talk 4950:SITH 4895:talk 4852:SITH 4828:talk 4803:talk 4737:SITH 4715:talk 4686:SITH 4632:talk 4576:SITH 4509:talk 4443:talk 4381:talk 4361:him. 4194:SITH 4175:Edit 4159:SITH 4097:talk 4046:SITH 3981:SITH 3961:talk 3917:SITH 3879:talk 3850:SITH 3830:talk 3796:SITH 3754:talk 3726:SITH 3645:SITH 3627:talk 3596:SITH 3580:and 3551:talk 3507:talk 3499:Done 3434:SITH 3414:talk 3376:SITH 3320:SITH 3255:SITH 3213:talk 3170:SITH 3140:talk 3100:SITH 3093:here 3077:talk 3032:SITH 3004:talk 2966:SITH 2924:SITH 2889:and 2866:SITH 2849:talk 2822:talk 2805:this 2751:talk 2702:talk 2653:talk 2638:talk 2612:this 2610:was 2586:SITH 2568:talk 2540:SITH 2531:and 2507:and 2491:and 2474:talk 2439:SITH 2418:and 2402:talk 2359:SITH 2337:talk 2310:SITH 2287:talk 2251:SITH 2228:talk 2171:SITH 2153:talk 2126:SITH 2098:talk 2064:SITH 2014:talk 1978:SITH 1963:OTRS 1943:talk 1906:talk 1877:SITH 1863:talk 1814:SITH 1807:this 1791:talk 1757:SITH 1735:talk 1699:SITH 1685:talk 1642:SITH 1602:SITH 1547:SITH 1532:talk 1456:talk 1410:talk 1368:SITH 1340:talk 1297:SITH 1278:talk 1241:SITH 1197:talk 1164:SITH 1132:talk 1100:SITH 1057:. — 1055:here 1038:SITH 1017:talk 991:logs 975:talk 971:edit 951:talk 918:SITH 899:much 884:talk 852:SITH 836:talk 802:SITH 784:talk 708:talk 681:SITH 674:Done 659:talk 638:SITH 617:talk 583:SITH 529:SITH 506:talk 492:talk 471:SITH 455:talk 433:SITH 404:SITH 384:talk 369:talk 338:SITH 315:SITH 268:SITH 226:SITH 202:talk 167:SITH 154:Hey 148:talk 140:WP:N 5628:in 5604:Hi 5549:to 5527:in 5519:Hi 5454:Hi 5393:Hi 5344:G13 5340:G12 5324:Hi 5258:Hi 5143:Hi 5089:Hi 4994:Hi 4914:in 4906:Hi 4875:Hi 4786:). 4673:in 4142:or 4108:Hi 3908:to 3888:Hi 3843:bot 3781:or 3763:Hi 3719:DGG 3704:DGG 3681:DGG 3636:Hi 3361:RMT 3239:Hi 3197:Hi 3161:Hi 3021:G13 3015:Hi 2959:Liz 2891:NPP 2776:• ( 2731:• ( 2682:• ( 2577:Hi 2416:BLP 2346:Hi 2301:Hi 2242:Hi 2194:Hi 2162:Hi 2109:Hi 2028:Hi 1969:on 1957:Hi 1635:DGG 1621:DGG 1587:DGG 1572:DGG 1236:. 1222:in 1141:Hi 937:AfC 893:Hi 826:to 793:Hi 633:. 449:— 397:IAR 5597:) 5584:? 5541:: 5512:) 5449:) 5445:• 5386:) 5319:) 5315:• 5252:) 5199:) 4989:) 4985:• 4921:, 4901:) 4897:• 4830:) 4822:! 4805:) 4721:) 4717:• 4677:, 4638:) 4634:• 4515:) 4511:• 4449:) 4445:• 4387:) 4383:• 4333:). 4287:, 4279:, 4103:) 4099:• 4039:}} 4033:{{ 3963:) 3881:) 3832:) 3756:) 3711:) 3688:) 3629:) 3553:) 3527:R2 3509:) 3463:R2 3425:, 3416:) 3341:R2 3297:R2 3219:) 3215:• 3146:) 3142:• 3095:. 3083:) 3079:• 3010:) 3006:• 2950:iz 2912:AN 2896:AN 2851:) 2824:) 2816:. 2753:) 2718:-- 2704:) 2655:) 2640:) 2570:) 2557:PA 2527:, 2476:) 2432:is 2404:) 2339:) 2293:) 2289:• 2234:) 2230:• 2155:) 2104:) 2100:• 2047:, 2039:, 2020:) 2016:• 1949:) 1945:• 1908:) 1865:) 1797:) 1793:• 1741:) 1737:• 1687:) 1628:) 1579:) 1534:) 1458:) 1416:) 1412:• 1346:) 1342:• 1284:) 1280:• 1203:) 1199:• 1134:) 1082:, 1019:) 989:| 985:| 981:| 977:| 973:| 959:) 886:) 838:) 786:) 770:, 766:, 762:, 758:, 754:, 750:, 746:, 742:, 738:, 734:, 730:, 710:) 661:) 619:) 508:) 494:) 457:) 386:) 371:) 204:) 150:) 134:, 130:, 126:, 122:, 118:, 114:, 64:← 5593:( 5508:( 5441:( 5382:( 5311:( 5248:( 5235:: 5231:@ 5195:( 4981:( 4893:( 4826:( 4801:( 4768:⚠ 4713:( 4630:( 4507:( 4441:( 4379:( 4135:. 4095:( 3959:( 3877:( 3828:( 3752:( 3707:( 3684:( 3625:( 3584:: 3576:@ 3570:: 3566:@ 3549:( 3534:) 3530:( 3505:( 3490:: 3486:@ 3470:) 3466:( 3412:( 3402:: 3398:@ 3348:) 3344:( 3304:) 3300:( 3211:( 3138:( 3075:( 3002:( 2947:L 2875:' 2847:( 2820:( 2780:) 2759:@ 2749:( 2735:) 2710:@ 2700:( 2686:) 2661:@ 2651:( 2636:( 2566:( 2493:2 2489:1 2487:( 2472:( 2400:( 2386:" 2335:( 2285:( 2226:( 2151:( 2096:( 2012:( 1941:( 1904:( 1861:( 1789:( 1733:( 1683:( 1677:: 1673:@ 1624:( 1575:( 1530:( 1454:( 1408:( 1338:( 1276:( 1195:( 1130:( 1072:) 1070:C 1067:· 1064:T 1062:( 1015:( 993:) 969:( 954:· 949:( 882:( 834:( 782:( 706:( 657:( 615:( 504:( 490:( 453:( 382:( 367:( 300:@ 200:( 188:: 184:@ 146:( 108:: 104:@ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index