421:
controversies. In the Roman rite, weddings are normally conducted in the context of the Mass. The same is true of funerals. confirmations, ordinations etc. The
Tridentine Breviary was not said by a congregation. Baptisms were, it is true, conducted separately, but my point about the use of the word Liturgy remains. However, to avoid repetition I have made a small amendment to your correction. Roger Arguile. St. Thomas More 2006
313:
the surface appeared to be criticizing your argument, that is entirely not the case. I find myself questioning the notability of any schools that do not have a strong claim to notability every time I come to AFDs like this. By any means, I just felt like letting you know that you've got my support, even if there appears to be an association of editors seeking to see how many non-notable schools they can cram in. :) --
953:
1061:
767:
578:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --
661:
620:
142:
There is something of a loose policy about pictures: if possible, they should be placed on the right-hand side of the page. I believe the reasoning behind this is that it is easier to read text with a consistent left margin and an uneven right margin than vice versa. That's why I moved the picture
336:
bible verses were individually notable. Slowly but surely
Knowledge accrued an article on each one: John 1:1, John 1:2, John 1:3 etc etc. And then opinions changed and the articles were largely vapourised. So perhaps one day this will happen with High Schools... although the line was easier to draw
312:
Hello, Stroika. For the record, I'd like to say that I agree with almost all of your assertions on the AFD, and my only issue was the manner in which you questioned each vote of keep as it came up, instead of focusing on one or two of the more questionable rationales for keep. Though I may have on
436:
to get the developers to create a parallel syntax that separates autoformatting and linking functions. IMV, it would go a long way towards fixing the untidy blueing of trivial chronological items, and would probably calm the nastiness between the anti- and pro-linking factions in the project. The
379:
I closed it because five days passed. If a nomination is withdrawn, and AfD should not be closed unless there are either no delete opinions left or they are so marginal as to not cause doubt about the AfD's outcome. An admin is not needed to close such AfD's. Use {{subst:afd top}} '''Withdrawn'''
261:
I find your tendency to comment on every "keep" vote a bit amusing if not a bit child like. I've looked at your list and I've not heard of any outside of the ones from
California. I suspect they are better known particularly in their regions where they are located rather than worldwide but I must
420:
Dear irate
Stroika, Loosely speaking you are right. However, the word Liturgy is used by for instance the Orthodox to mean the Mass. No one was confused by my usage. I would reserve my ire for the blatant POV articles on a whole host of entries, not least those on mdoern political figures and
194:
course of the liturgical reform. Bugnini, however, was certainly not the only member of
Consilium (or the only Catholic liturgist) with liberal ideas." (Addition: I've also just amended the introductory paragraph - a reference to the Masonic issue there seems appropriate. What do you think?)
251:
schools in general having articles on
Knowledge? To me it makes sense to have all but the most teenie tiny schools listed. Schools are centers for education and in that light it make sense to me to have articles about them in this new center for education, Knowledge.
1085:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
451:
My first instinct when I see something like that is just to revert to the last version that worked. Usually the problem has come up recently and there haven't been other useful edits in the meantime. And good on you for keeping morale up at the help desk. =)
296:
A few rungs down was meant to refer to eduational levels (ie: University, College, Junior
College, high school, elementary, kindergarten) but I see that I too wasn't clear in my wording. And I've perished the thought in my consensus comment already. :-)
1089:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
405:
Stroika, just wanted to drop you a note and tell you that I enjoyed our debate and in particular your usage of language. It a pleasure to read the arguments of others in a debate when the language they utilize has some semblance to prose. Cheers.
211:
Many thanks for your kind words and advice. I'm just going to make one further amendment - to change the introduction so that it presents the presentation of the dossier to Paul VI as a report rather than a fact. Does this seem reasonable?
45:
article delves on the "process" and not the background (i.e., speculation over the conclave). This means that this article could easily be merged with that one (and reduced to the size of the single section). I think I'll give it a
270:
argument with the inclusion of Eton and
Winchester as they are not the equivalent of high schools. While I admit that Eton and Winchester are likely known in the world outside of the UK I would say it's highly doubtful that
287:. It's best that a consensus determines the answers to such questions because the notion of notability tends to be a bit subjective once we get a few rungs down from Oxford or Cambridge (or Berkeley for that matter).
907:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
512:
I should have done it myself, I just wanted to state my intentions because there was a little bit of friction from one editor in the edit history on the Queens college page. Thanks for taking care of it.
380:~~~~ at the top and {{subst:afd bottom}} at he bottom of the AfD page, and remove the tag, and add {{subst:oldafdfull|date=Whatever the Nomination date}} to the article talk page. Cheers. -
332:) of editors have, over the years, decided that High Schools are, without exception, notable. And they are well organised, too. On the plus side, there was once a belief that
358:
This was very classy and you did not have to respond on my talk. It's fine and I may have overreacted. Please accept my apologies. I hope everything else goes right for you.
262:
confess to not being much of an authority on the notability of schools outside of the regions I'm familiar with (the UK not being one of them). If you are arguing against
433:
92:
Thanks for your help! I like to add info to the image pages when I can. I think in this case since we're not 100% confident I will not add an ID to the image. Cheers
328:
Hi
Stroika! Yeah, I agree with what I think you're implying... but the rule also applies to High Schools for the same reason: hundreds (sometimes it feels like
1072:
1082:
627:
601:
600:
type of rhetoric is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. You've been here sine 2005, so I'm at a loss for words. I assume you are familiar with
1014:
846:
830:
932:
715:
496:
229:
The chances of it getting deleted are probably slim to none once the "all schools are notable" people show up. I don't see why people cite
202:
is that the information is less detailed / specific than the info in the article, though I can't remember exactly what the old boy says. --
284:
872:
741:
664:
Welcome to
Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
554:
115:
190:
in particular - have seen in Bugnini's alleged Masonic connections an explanation for what they regard as the excessively liberal or
928:
834:
809:
575:
1018:
567:
162:
You're correct—it doesn't really matter how big the image is, because it will almost certainly create widows and orphans on
634:. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Knowledge page, must include proper
774:
760:
665:
191:
993:
391:
919:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1006:
964:
942:
924:
822:
778:
756:
263:
223:
960:
946:
1010:
852:
826:
1076:
492:
719:
876:
745:
550:
635:
187:
166:
display. It is more important to have a consistent image size—I think 200px or 250px are semi-standard. --
673:
623:
488:
842:
626:
to Knowledge, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Knowledge's policy that
546:
337:
with biblical verses - I'm not certain I could draw the line on what makes High Schools notable or not.
1040:
868:
737:
711:
583:
542:
484:
387:
42:
61:
41:
I would like to see the article gone, but I'm not confident that we'll get enough votes on afd. The
1022:
920:
838:
693:
650:
609:
75:
1098:
642:
461:
121:
480:
And i think it was intelligent, im just a kid and i just wanted to say thanks for the picture.
213:
203:
437:
proposal is to retain the existing function, to reduce the risk of objection from pro-linkers.
1030:
989:
896:
887:
805:
641:
There. Now that's out of the way, you are formally invited to discuss your proposed edits at
571:
521:
364:
338:
170:
151:
111:
916:
900:
230:
107:
915:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1036:
631:
579:
382:
272:
912:
904:
689:
646:
605:
238:
79:
432:
Dear Stroika—you may be interested in putting your name to, or at least commenting on
1094:
976:
908:
792:
669:
455:
407:
298:
288:
276:
267:
253:
74:
Since you have taken an interest in date links. Please be kind enough to vote for my
708:
why you take the name stroika? what it means? maybe write an article about it ok?
672:. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
517:
359:
342:
167:
148:
28:
791:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
975:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
314:
438:
47:
815:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
604:? In case you aren't, I'm going to give you a formal warning message below.
144:
123:
119:
1067:
1051:
126:
93:
1029:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
660:
619:
428:
Doing something about the ridiculous date autoformatting/linking mess
1102:
1044:
936:
880:
855:
749:
723:
697:
680:
This personal attack warning is due to your use of the edit summary
654:
613:
587:
525:
500:
476:
Hi im new, i would like to say that i check one of your image posts
466:
441:
410:
395:
369:
348:
317:
301:
291:
279:
256:
241:
216:
206:
175:
156:
129:
96:
82:
64:
50:
31:
676:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
903:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
186:
Hi again. How about the following formulation: "Some Catholics -
734:
Are you a Stroika? There are few of us here in the states...
951:
765:
275:
has equivalent notoriety particularly outside of the UK.
1065:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1017:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
999:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
833:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
681:
597:
24:
982:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
865:
NAP BOULE MAMA ZIZI ZOZO POSE PATNAIS POSAY PATKNEES
798:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1071:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
60:
He says that Lutherists war brother with Catoholic.
895:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
247:It's puzzling to me why such a strident efforts
23:Please answer any messages I have left for you
424:Oh and isn't it 'etc.'? Sorry to be picky. RA
628:biographical information about living persons
8:
688:, cowardice) in Latin. Do not do it again.
643:Talk:Elaine Pagels#Falsification of evidence
538:hello stroika, i am sphere, i wish to learn
266:with your subpage then you've relied upon a
866:
563:NowCommons: File:MemlingJudgmentCentre.jpg
1083:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Slughorn
988:notice, but please explain why in your
804:notice, but please explain why in your
602:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons
786:Tagged for notability since March 2009
576:Commons:File:MemlingJudgmentCentre.jpg
478:Memling's Day of Judgement, 1467-1471.
7:
1033:of each individual file for details.
775:Cold Cuts (Nicholas Greenwood album)
761:Cold Cuts (Nicholas Greenwood album)
106:It looks like the archbishop in the
1073:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
977:deleted for any of several reasons
967:because of the following concern:
793:deleted for any of several reasons
781:because of the following concern:
684:, where you called me a "coward" (
14:
1081:The article will be discussed at
1002:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
985:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
921:review the candidates' statements
1059:
659:
618:
285:Google seems to be saying no 'e'
971:unused, low-res, no obvious use
1103:14:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
961:File:MemlingJudgementRight.jpg
947:File:MemlingJudgementRight.jpg
927:. For the Election committee,
897:Arbitration Committee election
888:ArbCom elections are now open!
568:File:MemlingJudgmentCentre.jpg
1:
937:13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
724:17:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
698:08:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
668:other editors, as you did on
655:09:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
614:09:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
442:14:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
83:20:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
65:14:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
526:14:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
51:08:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
1021:allows discussion to reach
923:and submit your choices on
856:13:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
837:allows discussion to reach
818:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
801:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
750:18:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
501:16:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
264:Cardinal Newman High School
224:Cardinal Newman High School
118:and I found a couple more:
1118:
1045:01:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
1013:exist. In particular, the
929:MediaWiki message delivery
881:01:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
829:exist. In particular, the
467:08:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
110:photo is Leonardo Sandri!
1007:proposed deletion process
823:proposed deletion process
516:BTW, what is a GBW page?
349:18:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
318:21:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
302:20:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
292:19:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
280:19:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
257:17:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
242:09:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
217:13:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
207:11:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
176:00:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
157:17:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
1075:or whether it should be
588:05:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
411:16:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
396:08:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
370:12:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
130:16:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
97:14:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
32:08:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
810:the article's talk page
37:Re:Papal conclave, 2005
973:
956:
770:
969:
965:proposed for deletion
955:
901:Arbitration Committee
835:articles for deletion
779:proposed for deletion
769:
1019:files for discussion
994:the file's talk page
730:That is my last name
570:is now available on
557:) 23:09, May 4, 2009
200:Pope Paul's New Mass
43:Papal conclave, 2005
905:arbitration process
508:Sorry about that...
198:My recollection of
76:new bot application
1011:deletion processes
957:
917:arbitration policy
827:deletion processes
771:
943:Proposed deletion
883:
871:comment added by
757:Proposed deletion
740:comment added by
714:comment added by
593:Re: Elaine Pagels
572:Wikimedia Commons
559:
545:comment added by
504:
487:comment added by
394:
1109:
1063:
1062:
1034:
1004:
1003:
987:
986:
954:
849:
841:for deletion. –
820:
819:
803:
802:
768:
752:
726:
663:
622:
558:
539:
503:
481:
464:
459:
386:
367:
362:
345:
173:
154:
108:Deus Caritas Est
102:Leonardo Sandri!
1117:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1092:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1028:
1015:speedy deletion
1001:
1000:
984:
983:
952:
950:
925:the voting page
891:
863:
847:
831:speedy deletion
817:
816:
800:
799:
766:
764:
735:
732:
709:
706:
595:
565:
540:
536:
510:
482:
474:
457:
453:
449:
430:
418:
403:
377:
365:
360:
356:
343:
326:
273:Benenden School
227:
188:Traditionalists
184:
171:
152:
139:Hello Stroika!
137:
135:Image placement
104:
90:
72:
58:
39:
12:
11:
5:
1115:
1113:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1050:Nomination of
1048:
1025:for deletion.
1005:will stop the
949:
940:
894:
890:
885:
862:
859:
821:will stop the
789:
788:
763:
754:
731:
728:
716:94.145.251.190
705:
702:
701:
700:
594:
591:
564:
561:
535:
532:
530:
509:
506:
489:Teenage schola
473:
470:
448:
445:
429:
426:
417:
414:
402:
399:
376:
373:
355:
352:
325:
322:
321:
320:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
226:
220:
183:
180:
179:
178:
136:
133:
103:
100:
89:
86:
71:
68:
57:
54:
38:
35:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1114:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1087:
1084:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1053:
1049:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1032:
1026:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
997:
995:
991:
980:
978:
972:
968:
966:
962:
948:
944:
941:
939:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
889:
886:
884:
882:
878:
874:
873:23.91.233.168
870:
861:RIP BAM BOULE
860:
858:
857:
854:
851:
850:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
813:
811:
807:
796:
794:
787:
784:
783:
782:
780:
776:
762:
758:
755:
753:
751:
747:
743:
742:74.212.38.236
739:
729:
727:
725:
721:
717:
713:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:
677:
675:
671:
670:Elaine Pagels
667:
662:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:. Thank you.
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
616:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
592:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
562:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:86.42.135.149
544:
533:
531:
528:
527:
523:
519:
514:
507:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
479:
471:
469:
468:
463:
460:
446:
444:
443:
440:
435:
434:this new push
427:
425:
422:
415:
413:
412:
409:
400:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
374:
372:
371:
368:
363:
353:
351:
350:
347:
346:
340:
335:
331:
323:
319:
316:
311:
303:
300:
295:
294:
293:
290:
286:
283:
282:
281:
278:
274:
269:
268:false analogy
265:
260:
259:
258:
255:
250:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
225:
221:
219:
218:
215:
209:
208:
205:
201:
196:
193:
189:
181:
177:
174:
169:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
155:
150:
146:
140:
134:
132:
131:
128:
124:
122:
120:
117:
113:
109:
101:
99:
98:
95:
87:
85:
84:
81:
77:
69:
67:
66:
63:
55:
53:
52:
49:
44:
36:
34:
33:
30:
26:
21:
20:
19:
1093:
1088:
1080:
1066:
1054:for deletion
1031:page history
1027:
1009:, but other
998:
990:edit summary
981:
974:
970:
958:
892:
867:— Preceding
864:
845:
825:, but other
814:
806:edit summary
797:
790:
785:
773:The article
772:
733:
707:
685:
674:welcome page
658:
640:
630:must not be
617:
596:
566:
537:
529:
515:
511:
477:
475:
450:
431:
423:
419:
404:
383:CrazyRussian
381:
378:
357:
341:
333:
329:
327:
248:
234:
233:when it's a
228:
210:
199:
197:
185:
163:
141:
138:
116:this caption
112:ClaudeMuncey
105:
91:
73:
59:
40:
22:
17:
16:
15:
736:—Preceding
710:—Preceding
541:—Preceding
483:—Preceding
192:Modernistic
1037:FastilyBot
913:topic bans
704:adsfgfhghj
580:Erwin85Bot
447:no problem
324:Notability
237:policy. --
147:. HTH! --
70:Date links
56:John XXIII
1023:consensus
963:has been
959:The file
909:site bans
843:Fayenatic
839:consensus
777:has been
690:Viriditas
686:Timiditas
647:Viriditas
606:Viriditas
239:Coredesat
231:WP:SCHOOL
164:someone's
145:Dies Irae
80:bobblewik
62:Swedenman
18:GREETINGS
1095:Jontesta
1068:Slughorn
1052:Slughorn
1035:Thanks,
869:unsigned
738:unsigned
712:unsigned
632:libelous
555:contribs
543:unsigned
497:contribs
485:unsigned
408:Netscott
401:CNHS Afd
330:millions
299:Netscott
289:Netscott
277:Netscott
254:Netscott
235:rejected
1077:deleted
636:sources
624:Welcome
534:Message
518:Hewinsj
416:Liturgy
344:ЯEDVERS
249:against
182:Bugnini
168:bdesham
149:bdesham
29:Stroika
992:or on
899:. The
808:or on
666:attack
375:HS AfD
315:Kuzaar
114:found
88:Cordes
46:try.--
853:ondon
392:email
214:Ancus
204:Ancus
48:Jiang
1099:talk
1041:talk
933:talk
877:talk
746:talk
720:talk
694:talk
682:here
651:talk
610:talk
598:This
584:talk
551:talk
522:talk
493:talk
462:acan
439:Tony
388:talk
361:Yank
222:Re:
25:here
945:of
893:Hi,
759:of
574:as
456:coe
366:sox
354:Hey
334:all
143:at
127:Cam
94:Cam
1101:)
1079:.
1043:)
996:.
979:.
935:)
911:,
879:)
812:.
795:.
748:)
722:)
696:)
653:)
645:.
612:)
586:)
553:•
524:)
499:)
495:•
472::)
465:—
454:—
339:➨
212:--
125:--
78:.
27:--
1097:(
1039:(
931:(
875:(
848:L
744:(
718:(
692:(
649:(
608:(
582:(
549:(
520:(
491:(
458:l
390:/
172:★
153:★
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.