694:. This is not the first time someone's acted like they own a wikipedia page and reverted good faith edits I've made, but it's the first time I've gone to the admins for help, and this is the way I get treated? How do you think I can continue contributing to this site, when you've shown that in the event of disagreement you'll side with the bully? Please do not reply any further unless you've already done something constructive to fix this. Continuing to claim this is my fault or that I've done something wrong will only antagonise me further.
622:, since they often involve mere personal taste, and there is often very little to discuss other than "I like this one better". Other than that, it is not a recommendation but a requirement to discuss content disputes with other editors. When they refuse to discuss, or continue being disruptive despite discussion, that is the time to start reporting things to noticeboards. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if there's any way I can help.
893:
820:
222:
386:
63:
593:
I can just blatantly log in from another IP and revert the other guy's edits and that's allowed. (No, obviously I won't do this - it's the other guy who's behaving like an asshole. obviously doing that). This is how you drive people away from contributing to wikipedia - by allowing a user to act like
476:
I'd be happy to discuss this, as I initially did when I reinstated my changes, but it's the other party who's made reverts without giving a reason - it's my position that they're edit-warring, not me. The other user has plenty of edits on this page, so I appreciate they make valuable contributions to
789:
in the coat of arms of the family also indicates a Norman origin. I just don't do edits on that scale, because more than likely no one will edit the page for many months, leaving my mistakes (that become
Knowledge (XXG)'s mistakes) on show. You'd just have to blank the page then change categories to
329:
Thanks for your message. I read it immediately after clicking save, I'm embarrassed to admit. I thought it obvious I didn't need to cite that the sky is blue - I googled that, was pleased to immediately find wikipedia has a ] article on the subject and linked it before reading it. At the time I was
689:
Listen? I stopped reading right there, mate. Why would I listen to you, when you've shown that the things I say, and the work I do on this site, don't matter? It's the other guy who reverted my edits without giving a reason - you can see that for yourself - and yet I get threatened with the three
663:
if you suspect that the other user is being disruptive, that means that you should be the absolute first person to go to talk and try to resolve the issue. That way when you go to a noticeboard, you don't just go with reverts, you go with "I tried to use the article talk a long time ago, and they
640:
It's courteous of you to drop by and I'd be amenable to some kind of dispute resolution if I thought the other guy would listen. But you've just allowed him to get away with blatantly breaking your The three-revert rule by using a sockpuppet IP, and you're sanctioning the guy who just tried to
742:
I doubt I'll ever contribute to wikipedia again, mate. You've shown me that you can do whatever you like, as long as you log in from a sockpuppet IP. None of your comments addressed his reverts, or acknowledged how blatant it was. You threatened me for trying to contribute positively, and you
832:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
481:
and pettily revert any edits they simply don't like. As I said in the page history, this is hostile - people aren't going to want to edit wikipedia if a user can "own" a page, and boss other contributors about. I appreciate your time, and any advice you can give in dealing with this.
905:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
330:
quite frustrated - perhaps it is because of News
Biscuit's British humour that American readers do not appreciate its satirical nature, and perhaps because political satire may often depend upon knowing who the players are (News Biscuit have published an article on
428:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
451:, and welcome to my talk page. I gave good reasons for the edit at the time I originally made it - these are better quality images which better represent the subject. My edit has been repeatedly reverted by another user without good reason or explanation.
594:
they "own" a page, and revert good faith edits without good reason. I gave reasons for my edits in the change log, the other guy did not. I have no need to take it to the Talk Page, because I know the guy won't listen to me. Thanks for your help, though.
234:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
457:
780:
463:
933:
860:
466:
should be moved lower down the page if it must be kept for the purposes of placating someone, but it's really not that good quality of an image - the subject is not looking directly at the camera and his face is in
262:
532:
IDK, I'm just someone who edits wikipedia sometimes, I don't pretend to be an expert and I'm just trying to improve the site and work it out as I'm going along, but IMO the other user is showing bad faith.
917:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
844:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
246:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
747:
who reverted me because they think they own the page. I contributed hundreds of hours to wikipedia, and there was far too much of the stuff. I'm only logged in now to find an old page I worked on.
664:
refused to discuss the issue," which is a much much stronger case that the other user is being openly disruptive, and is much more likely to actually result in sanctions.
189:, whether they're editing the same articles or using a "bad hand" IP to vandalise articles they're avoiding touching with their main account. As far as I understand it,
424:
from editing
Knowledge (XXG). This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the
92:
334:
today). But to me you don't use "it's cited from a reliable source" as an excuse to write things that are obviously wrong on wikipedia, so I was pissed off.
193:
discourages "fishing" to see which accounts might be linked to a bad IP, but if you ever have any idea who the main account might be, by all means raise an
151:
87:
409:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
147:
947:
874:
618:
Just dropping this here because I've seen a lot of people get wrapped up in it. Image choice disputes are particularly good candidates for
276:
185:(which the IP has now deleted) - somebody switching to an IP to make damaging edits on controversial subjects certainly goes against
365:
779:, just wondered can you make an edit to Maiorana page please? That the name is Norman French in origin, on page 326 of this source
49:
943:
870:
272:
926:
853:
255:
144:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
708:
YOU are the one wanting to make a change, so YOU need to go to the talk page when it is contested to gain consensus as in
790:
Norman and "Maiorana is an
Italian surname" to "Maiorana is a Norman French surname" (Good examples of Norman names are
421:
938:
865:
267:
406:
401:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is known as "
300:. While I agree that well-known satirical web sites do not belong on that list, the essay you cited is an argument
136:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
499:
425:
402:
390:
317:
36:
Thank you for the article on what seems a worthy topic. I have queried the notability tag that has been placed.
914:
841:
243:
744:
717:
433:
803:
665:
623:
588:
414:
137:
122:
410:
359:
349:
551:. If you continue reverting their edits, you will also be blocked for violating 3RR. As mentioned at
901:
828:
297:
230:
212:
186:
310:
141:
910:
837:
239:
791:
713:
560:
446:
429:
202:
799:
398:
167:
118:
67:
41:
922:
849:
555:
and elsewhere, please start a talk page discussion if you have issues with the other editor.
305:
251:
190:
353:
925:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
918:
852:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
845:
619:
548:
478:
254:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
247:
194:
74:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
552:
394:
110:
580:
556:
198:
158:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
79:
776:
748:
695:
642:
595:
534:
483:
335:
331:
163:
159:
29:
22:
892:
819:
221:
498:
In addition to my comments above, I believe the other editor is in breach of the
420:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be
109:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
458:
File:Lord
Heseltine speaking at 'Creating conditions for regional growth'.jpg
712:. I have started a conversation there for you, but you have not joined in.
479:
wikipedia cannot operate if users are allowed to act like they own articles
464:
File:Lord
Heseltine, Deputy Prime Minister, UK (1995-97) (10559130986).jpg
795:
929:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
856:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
385:
258:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
304:
providing a citation for obvious claims. I think you were looking for
951:
878:
807:
756:
721:
703:
676:
650:
634:
603:
564:
542:
491:
437:
371:
343:
323:
280:
206:
171:
126:
932:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
859:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
261:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
709:
913:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
840:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
522:
515:
508:
289:
242:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
182:
140:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
114:
102:
98:
83:
32:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
197:
going into detail about any similarities of edits. --
502:
mentioned in your copypasta. The three reverts are:
17:
A page you started (Frank Cowper) has been reviewed!
8:
132:Disambiguation link notification for June 13
405:" and is usually seen as obstructing the
40:To reply, leave a comment on Noyster's
7:
902:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
829:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
231:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
915:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
842:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
244:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
886:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
813:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
891:
818:
743:validated and supported someone
397:other editors' contributions at
384:
220:
61:
936:and submit your choices on the
863:and submit your choices on the
798:). Hope you can help, thanks.--
899:Hello, Strolls. Voting in the
826:Hello, Strolls. Voting in the
393:. You appear to be repeatedly
228:Hello, Strolls. Voting in the
1:
952:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
281:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
879:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
757:17:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
372:20:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
344:04:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
324:20:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
547:Please take this matter to
265:and submit your choices on
969:
944:MediaWiki message delivery
871:MediaWiki message delivery
808:21:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
722:20:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
704:11:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
677:00:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
641:improve a wikipedia page.
391:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
348:There may be more on this
273:MediaWiki message delivery
263:the candidates' statements
207:16:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
57:Reference errors on 10 May
785:the book states that the
782:Della Calabria illustrata
651:23:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
635:23:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
604:23:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
565:23:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
543:18:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
492:17:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
438:17:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
172:09:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
752:
699:
692:that he's already broken
646:
599:
538:
487:
339:
296:I think you should read
127:00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
115:report it to my operator
460:would be worth keeping.
28:Knowledge (XXG) editor
407:normal editing process
138:Dolomedes briangreenei
72:automatically detected
38:
911:Arbitration Committee
838:Arbitration Committee
319:Tell me all about it.
240:Arbitration Committee
213:ArbCom Elections 2016
88:broken reference name
34:
395:reverting or undoing
160:opt-out instructions
21:Thanks for creating
710:bold revert discuss
523:17:45, 9 March 2017
516:13:15, 9 March 2017
509:23:12, 8 March 2017
142:National Geographic
927:arbitration policy
854:arbitration policy
792:Banister (surname)
256:arbitration policy
215:: Voting now open!
150:• Join us at the
659:Listen, even and
589:Timothyjosephwood
500:three-revert rule
426:three-revert rule
399:Michael Heseltine
320:
290:this edit summary
155:
96:
53:
48:Learn more about
960:
895:
822:
674:
671:
668:
632:
629:
626:
592:
584:
525:
518:
511:
450:
388:
368:
362:
356:
322:
318:
315:
224:
191:Checkuser policy
145:
90:
65:
64:
47:
968:
967:
963:
962:
961:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
896:
888:
883:
882:
823:
815:
773:
771:Change for page
672:
669:
666:
630:
627:
624:
616:
586:
585:. According to
578:
577:No, that's ok,
521:
514:
507:
477:this site, but
444:
382:
366:
360:
354:
311:
309:
294:
285:
284:
268:the voting page
225:
217:
179:
152:DPL WikiProject
134:
62:
59:
19:
12:
11:
5:
966:
964:
934:the candidates
897:
890:
889:
887:
884:
861:the candidates
824:
817:
816:
814:
811:
772:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
682:
681:
680:
679:
654:
653:
615:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
570:
569:
568:
567:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
519:
512:
495:
494:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
461:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
293:
286:
226:
219:
218:
216:
210:
178:
177:217.40.202.110
175:
133:
130:
111:false positive
107:
106:
58:
55:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
965:
954:
953:
949:
945:
941:
940:
935:
930:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
907:
904:
903:
894:
885:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:
862:
857:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
834:
831:
830:
821:
812:
810:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
788:
784:
783:
778:
770:
758:
754:
750:
746:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
723:
719:
715:
714:Theroadislong
711:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
693:
690:strikes rule
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
678:
675:
662:
658:
657:
656:
655:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:
637:
636:
633:
621:
613:
605:
601:
597:
590:
582:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:
544:
540:
536:
531:
524:
520:
517:
513:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
501:
497:
496:
493:
489:
485:
480:
475:
474:
465:
462:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
448:
447:Theroadislong
442:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
430:Theroadislong
427:
423:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
379:
373:
369:
367:contributions
363:
357:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
328:
327:
326:
325:
321:
316:
314:
307:
303:
299:
291:
287:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
264:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
236:
233:
232:
223:
214:
211:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
176:
174:
173:
169:
165:
161:
156:
153:
149:
143:
139:
131:
129:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
104:
100:
94:
89:
85:
81:
80:Cliff Richard
77:
76:
75:
73:
69:
56:
54:
51:
50:page curation
45:
43:
37:
33:
31:
26:
24:
16:
937:
931:
908:
900:
898:
864:
858:
835:
827:
825:
800:Theo Mandela
787:fleur-de-lis
786:
781:
777:User:Strolls
774:
691:
660:
617:
419:
403:edit warring
383:
332:Michael Gove
313:MjolnirPants
312:
301:
295:
266:
260:
237:
229:
227:
183:this comment
180:
157:
135:
119:ReferenceBot
108:
103:Ask for help
71:
68:ReferenceBot
60:
46:
39:
35:
27:
25:, Strolls!
23:Frank Cowper
20:
939:voting page
866:voting page
389:Hello, and
355:Vchimpanzee
66:Hello, I'm
923:topic bans
850:topic bans
745:WP:ENTITED
661:especially
380:March 2017
298:WP:NOTBLUE
252:topic bans
187:WP:ILLEGIT
181:Regarding
162:. Thanks,
117:. Thanks,
113:, you can
919:site bans
846:site bans
456:Arguably
415:talk page
411:consensus
248:site bans
146:Read the
86:caused a
84:your edit
70:. I have
42:talk page
796:Molyneux
749:Stroller
696:Stroller
643:Stroller
596:Stroller
581:Primefac
557:Primefac
535:Stroller
484:Stroller
336:Stroller
199:McGeddon
667:Timothy
625:Timothy
467:shadow.
443:Hello,
422:blocked
413:on the
306:WP:BLUE
164:DPL bot
78:On the
30:Noyster
670:Joseph
628:Joseph
620:WP:RfC
614:Advice
549:WP:3RR
288:About
195:WP:SPI
82:page,
553:WP:AN
308:. ;)
948:talk
909:The
875:talk
836:The
804:talk
794:and
753:talk
718:talk
700:talk
673:Wood
647:talk
631:Wood
600:talk
561:talk
539:talk
488:talk
434:talk
361:talk
350:here
340:talk
277:talk
238:The
203:talk
168:talk
123:talk
93:help
775:Hi
370:•
352:.—
302:FOR
292:...
148:FAQ
99:Fix
97:. (
950:)
942:.
921:,
877:)
869:.
848:,
806:)
755:)
720:)
702:)
649:)
602:)
563:)
541:)
490:)
436:)
417:.
364:•
358:•
342:)
279:)
271:.
250:,
205:)
170:)
125:)
101:|
44:.
946:(
873:(
802:(
751:(
716:(
698:(
645:(
598:(
591::
587:@
583::
579:@
559:(
537:(
486:(
449::
445:@
432:(
338:(
275:(
201:(
166:(
154:.
121:(
105:)
95:)
91:(
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.