Knowledge

User talk:Sukiari

Source 📝

635: 1253: 810: 1213:, this is grounds for being blocked by an administrator. You were lucky not to have been permanently blocked for this episode and if there is any repeat I will ensure that you will be blocked for Knowledge's own protection. Your behaviour was completely unacceptable and you appear to have no regrets for what you did, so I wanted to make you aware in advance of the consequences of any repeat. -- 1421: 860:. Regrettably, I have had to undo your contributions. First, the consensus method of handling the possessive of a ship name is for the ship name to be in italic text and the "'s" to be in Roman (that is, non-italic) text. Because the straight quote used as an apostrophe is also used as a formatting code on Knowledge it requires the use of the <nowiki: --> 1672: 939: 898: 1506:
We have several people, all active on the same topics, coming out of the woodwork to rv me. I edit in good faith and think this is inappropriate. I will leave the article alone for the time being, but both cites are apropos to the topic and Wikileaks is a very useful and apropos source for citation
831:
I have left a courteous message on this page previously regarding your propensity to attack the editor Enigmaman, and towards that point you are obviously continuing with such an attack when you detail that he is a troll - when in fact (as others have noted) his edits were constructive. You should
438:
hmmm, I don't know you or what you stand for, but good for you! This atmosphere of wikichill is really awful, and just more fodder for the press. Stifle (apt name), how will you feel if the next story includes people running around warning people to shut up or be banned? Do you think that will help
1343:
As an aside, each of these folks come in, and revert twice, then desist. So, I am only reverting twice at the most. for each revert of my revert. My question is, how many people will come revert my reverts of another person't revert? Note that in the talk page there are attempts to deliberately
545:
I happened upon your note on BillCJ's talk page, and wanted to let you know that edit-warring will not help you get your way. Please do not threaten one, or engage in one. If you have a legitimate problem, bring it to the wider community, but saying "I can revert more than you" is no way to win an
358:
I'd love to see a good bit on exotic lens materials, but it needs to be sourced. I'm wondering what basis you are using for the materials you are listing; if you'll point it out, I'll be happy to edit up the reference. Is there something relevant in the Italian doc? Looks like, but it's hard to
1072:
I admit nothing other than trying my hardest to improve the wikipedia. So people come out of the woodwork to make the *exact* same reverts, despite cites. I'm just one person here. How many folks have come out of nowhere to make the exact same revert (nominally against the first cite, but also
1037:
Oh I am sure I would be reported. To me the truth of the matter is important enough to risk being reported. If you get enough people to revert the same exact stuff, while making weak arguments disputing the use of wikileaks which is a major source of high import, I'm sure you can get me in some
652:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient
308:
are you talking about? A number of authoritative investigations in the course of the last 100 years proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the text is a "literary forgery", "hoax", "plagiarism" and "fraud". Your wording "widely regarded as" suggests that there is a real possibility that the
180:
You are correct, in that the previous content was mostly a bunch of hooey, and that I didn't read through the entire thing to get a full sense of the context - I apologize for the confusion. I am generally wary of edits that remove very large sections of existing text without providing an
1087:
Note that I try to improve the Knowledge, and despite some of my edits being controversial to some degree, they are all in good faith. The majority of them are simple cleanup, but some attract swarms of people all of a single mind. This seems to violate the good faith tenet of the WP.
425:
I am aware of this possibility. If indeed I am subjected to harassment because I have publicly disapproved of these dishonorable and gestapoesque tactics then I will probably have to start editing the WP anonymously, or write the project off altogether as a lost cause.
410:
Please be aware that the material you have recently added to your userpage about Durova and the secret mailing list might bring unwanted attention to you and bring accusations, which I am not making, of harassment. I would recommend that you remove it to avoid trouble.
1135:
I will be researching the links the 4 or 5 editors who all made the same reverts have to each other. Let's hope this isn't damning to the WP in general - there have been more than a few incidents like this lately. Shades of Megaphone and the Cyberstalking list.
185:, which was the reasoning for my revert. And while I didn't mention anything on the talk page, I did mention it in my own edit summary; my only concern was that such a large portion of text was removed with justification. Cheers. -- 617:
I appreciate your right to "defend" articles but it appears to be very poor form to accept and continue to promenade a barnstar on your user page from a user who has "rewarded" you for being uncivil on that articles talk
523:
Hi Sukiari. In response to your oppose of Raul654, I think you're confusing two different mailing lists. Raul founded the arbcom-l list, a list that, while private, is accountable, has a known list of members (see
1747:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 492:
Good tip Carl. I wonder if anybody on the secret list ever used offensive terminology? I guess we'll never know, as there are claims that there is no archive of the list (although I know this to be false).
1615:
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
86:
I have read a lot of the articles, but haven't contributed that much yet. I have a few ideas in mind, especially for camera and photography related articles. I hope I don't screw anything up! :-)
528:), and is not at all a secret. I don't think he had anything to do with the cyberstalking mailing list you're concerned about, and there's a big difference between the two. Hope that helps. 475:
Please refrain from using loaded terminology such as Gestapo. The only effect of that language is to poison discussion. If you want to discuss the Durova matter, do so with civility. — Carl
202:
No sweat. All the old information remains in the revert history, so anybody who would like to comb through that tripe and extract the few bits of useful information is welcome to do so.
1201:
despite being told to stop. What's more, the thing you were edit-warring over was a link to an undisputed copyright violation. You knowingly and repeatedly added this link which, as
1522:
is generally considered a bright line rule and it's clear that you violated it. Anytime your edits are reverted, the best idea is to arrive at a consensus on the talk page before
380: 693:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
656:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
1631:
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
1281: 1636: 1567:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
383:, but didn't actually open a deletion debate. I hope I haven't been too bold in correcting your mistake. Next time follow the directions on the AFD template. 68:
using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the
1132:
Why not take a keen interest in the truth instead? This seems like an abuse of Knowledge's administrative process than a search for useful material.
1073:
reverting the second)? Call in the mods. Lock the article. Ban me for trying to keep the Knowledge useful! But it looks pretty bad either way.
1358:
That would be two times the number of people, and if there is more than one person that leads to more than three reverts. Have a look at the 3RR.
706: 575:
My opinion is that editwarring gets nowhere, as does threatening it. Discuss first, instead of having some contest over who has more free time. --
65: 702: 49: 369: 1772: 1461: 1552: 1313: 722: 280: 25:
to Knowledge. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
653:
information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
1640:
involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by
155: 1619:
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
1687:
because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
385:
I will also reiterate a previous point on this page, to include "AFD" in your edit summary when placing {{subst:afd}} on a page.
1768: 1537: 525: 1285: 1210: 985: 687: 683: 634: 151: 144: 1680: 1456: 814: 677: 439:
Knowledge? I'm not meaning this personally, but you really need to consider this. It doesn't look good, at least to me.
34: 22: 1759:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1764: 1301: 1277: 1592:
This year you have marked all of your edits as minor edits, when they clearly do not meet the criteria. Please read
1714: 1433:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1344:
paint my cites as bad faith, where this is absolutely not true and it becomes obvious if one reads the citations.
671: 1434: 1260: 1206: 981: 826: 761: 116: 54: 877:
in nautical usage is the impact of two moving objects, such as two ships, or a ship and a whale, for example. —
789:
Evidence is not proof, and many a user has been accused of being a sockpuppet just to shut them up and ban them.
1428: 1324: 644: 243:
There's nothing in the document cited about flying a passenger jet into a tall building. What's your source?
29: 1696: 1688: 1475: 444: 61: 869:
word and in its nautical sense refers to the impact of a moving ship into a stationary object, such as
648:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1218: 1620: 1601: 902: 757: 512: 103: 1760: 1656: 1532: 1507:
all over the Knowledge, despite it being constructed of nothing but supposed copyright violations!
1317: 947: 882: 784: 230: 189: 69: 1717:
back in 2009 and had to comment and ask whether you think I did a good enough job on the article?
1623:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 1574: 1439: 1397: 1345: 1183: 1137: 1089: 1074: 1039: 996: 790: 561:
My own opinion is irrelevant. My problem was only with the tactics you were threatening to use. --
494: 459: 429: 206: 89: 1791: 1233: 1214: 1169: 965: 818: 710: 660: 532: 326: 295: 194: 186: 44: 1052:
So do you admit you knowingly and intentionally broke 3RR? Do you intent to continue reverting?
1736: 1727: 1202: 955: 914: 906: 835: 619: 589:
Discussion. That's always the option. If that goes nowhere, then there are other avenues; see
244: 182: 159: 1756: 1740: 1692: 1676: 1561: 1366: 1307: 1122: 1060: 1025: 925: 598: 580: 566: 551: 440: 416: 322: 226:
Please include the word "AfD" in the edit summary and please do not mark the edit as minor.
1755:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 376: 1641: 1597: 1593: 1252: 1152: 732: 318: 291: 266: 1752: 1744: 1652: 1648: 1527: 995:
If what I'm told is not really of much value, expect a fair return on the investment.
951: 910: 878: 777: 392: 283:
may be not a hoax/forgery? Is there any serious reliable source backing up your claims
39: 809: 1787: 1748: 1519: 1289: 1198: 1014: 980:. Even better, please actually read what you're being told about inappropriate links 977: 960: 943: 753: 716: 529: 482: 360: 262: 258: 220: 163: 124: 73: 1718: 1297: 1293: 1273: 1269: 1160: 590: 345: 314: 901:
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Knowledge, as you did to
699:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
1360: 1116: 1054: 1019: 919: 854: 594: 576: 562: 547: 412: 173: 107: 1721: 1163:. We have no idea if the contents of that ZIP file have been altered, or ever 771:
This user is a sock puppet of Seancarlin84, and has been blocked indefinitely.
726: 257:
Please do not add your personal opinions to talk pages. It is a violation of
1627:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 958:. It's already been noted that your edits of this user page are unwelcome. — 942:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did to
649: 387: 1647:
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of
478: 121: 938: 897: 1684: 1611:
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
1596:
or better yet, just don't mark any of your edits as minor. Thank you.
507:
Hi - I saw your post vote against Raul654 about that. What is it? --
1114:
I have filed an ANI report to try to resolve this immediate problem.
1795: 1776: 1700: 1660: 1605: 1582: 1542: 1405: 1373: 1353: 1331: 1240: 1222: 1191: 1176: 1145: 1097: 1082: 1067: 1047: 1032: 1004: 989: 932: 886: 840: 798: 765: 738: 624: 602: 584: 570: 555: 535: 518: 497: 487: 467: 449: 432: 420: 400: 363: 348: 329: 298: 269: 247: 233: 209: 197: 167: 135: 92: 76: 458:
Arbcom might as well stand for Arbitrary Coordinated Maneuvering.
102:
Sockpuppet? What are you talking about? Are you asking me if im an
1396:
As another aside, they are mostly Germans. What's up with that?
1182:
The zip file is from wikileaks. Verify the IP address yourself.
909:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been 748:
I just wanted to say thanks for your persistence in defending the
1743:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
158:, as that is the proper place to request renames of categories. — 667: 306:
the original 'protocols' which the printed versions descend from
106:? Because I ain't. I'm not the one reverting your edits on the 1155:. Further, adding a link to a ZIP file on a random server is 313:
is a factual document. Please review our policies concerning
1419: 1251: 633: 1644:). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note. 1549:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1292:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 1151:
Knowledge is not here to promote one editor's version of
1710:
I agree with your main page comment, but don't despair!
1569:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
917:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
1679:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of 1489: 1485: 1479: 1470: 1466: 1452: 1448: 1444: 905:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the 694: 288: 286: 284: 1231:
have the original? Face it, this is not verifiable. —
690:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
110:
page. Pierpontpaul2351 21:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1296:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 1427:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1300:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 853:
Sukiari, thank you for making the effort to improve
630:
Image source problem with Image:MaxHeadroom copy.svg
381:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 20
721:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 954:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1735:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 670:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 1634:For established users such as yourself there is 1282:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident 756:article. You are a gentleman and a scholar.-- 229:Remember that when making future nominations. 8: 1284:. During a dispute, you should first try to 1197:Let's be clear. You repeatedly violated the 526:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee#Mailing list 359:tell if it supports what it's attached to. 72:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1013:Courtesy notice: I have reported you to 775:Please refer to Checkuser for evidence. 666:tag can be used to release it under the 1209:that puts Knowledge at legal risk. Per 684:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use 705:. If the image is copyrighted under a 370:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Uglor 152:Category:Japanese World War II people 145:Category:Japanese World War II people 7: 150:I have moved your rename request of 817:other editors, which you did here: 682:or one of the other tags listed at 281:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion 946:. Your edits appear to constitute 14: 1761:review the candidates' statements 379:for deletion and added a link to 156:Knowledge:Categories for deletion 1670: 937: 896: 808: 719:after 14:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 64:! By the way, please be sure to 1312:below, but you should read our 832:cease such attacks immediately. 375:You appeared to have nominated 1796:17:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) 1767:. For the Election committee, 1737:Arbitration Committee election 1728:ArbCom elections are now open! 1211:Knowledge:Copyright violations 723:Media copyright questions page 688:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 344:" The correct answer is YES. 221:How to list pages for deletion 143:Moved your request for rename 136:04:44, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1: 1777:12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1606:05:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 1583:11:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1543:12:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1406:10:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1374:10:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1354:10:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1332:10:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1286:discuss controversial changes 1264:from editing for a period of 1241:23:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1223:21:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1192:20:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1177:13:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1146:10:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1098:10:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1083:10:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1068:10:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1048:10:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1033:10:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1005:10:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 990:09:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 401:16:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 270:04:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 168:23:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC) 30:The five pillars of Knowledge 1701:23:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 703:criteria for speedy deletion 536:01:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 519:01:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 498:21:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 488:13:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 468:06:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 450:05:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 433:10:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 421:10:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 364:03:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 234:07:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 210:01:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 198:00:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 66:sign your name on talk pages 50:How to write a great article 1763:and submit your choices on 1431:, who declined the request. 933:08:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 887:16:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 349:07:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 93:07:37, 22 August 2005 (UTC) 77:23:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC) 1811: 1769:MediaWiki message delivery 1661:19:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1526:more reversions are done. 1205:makes clear, is a form of 873:into the stationary pier. 739:14:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 715:the image will be deleted 672:Knowledge:Non-free content 645:Image:MaxHeadroom copy.svg 603:22:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 585:22:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 571:15:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 556:03:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 330:20:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 299:05:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 1722:18:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC) 1681:your recent contributions 1553:guide to appealing blocks 1314:guide to appealing blocks 1207:contributory infringement 1167:the original ZIP file. — 913:. Please make use of the 841:02:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 829:from editing Knowledge. 799:01:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 625:22:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 1706:Agree but don't dispair! 1705: 1578: 1401: 1349: 1187: 1141: 1093: 1078: 1043: 1000: 794: 766:17:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 342:Are you really a Legend? 248:02:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 205:Thanks for responding. 154:from Requested moves to 1782:Is it still 1984-esque? 1235:The Hand That Feeds You 1171:The Hand That Feeds You 821:. If you continue, you 638:Image Copyright problem 1637:a workaround available 1424: 1256: 639: 336:you asked the question 275:What are you implying? 1741:Arbitration Committee 1476:change block settings 1423: 1276:and violation of the 1255: 642:Thanks for uploading 637: 115:moved from userpage. 1621:consensus discussion 982:William M. Connolley 903:Astronauts Gone Wild 678:non-free fair use in 674:, use a tag such as 104:Internet sock puppet 21:Hello, Sukiari, and 1745:arbitration process 1713:I saw your comment 1310:|Your reason here}} 1304:by adding the text 976:Please be aware of 215:Your AfD nomination 98:Moved from userpage 1757:arbitration policy 1425: 1294:dispute resolution 1257: 1038:serious trouble! 838: 819:Talk:Dana Jacobson 711:Knowledge:Fair use 701:, as described on 640: 622: 503:Secret ArbCom list 35:How to edit a page 1371: 1302:contest the block 1278:three-revert rule 1127: 1065: 1030: 930: 836: 620: 486: 447: 315:original research 138: 1802: 1674: 1673: 1630: 1626: 1566: 1560: 1540: 1530: 1495: 1493: 1482: 1464: 1462:deleted contribs 1422: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1327: 1311: 1236: 1172: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1031: 1028: 1024: 941: 931: 928: 924: 900: 812: 780: 707:non-free license 681: 665: 659: 515: 510: 476: 445: 399: 390: 192: 133: 130: 127: 119: 114: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1784: 1765:the voting page 1731: 1708: 1671: 1668: 1628: 1624: 1613: 1594:HELP:Minor edit 1590: 1572: 1564: 1558: 1557:, then use the 1546: 1538: 1528: 1509: 1483: 1473: 1459: 1442: 1435:blocking policy 1420: 1367: 1359: 1334: 1325: 1305: 1298:page protection 1249: 1234: 1170: 1161:reliable source 1123: 1115: 1061: 1053: 1026: 1018: 974: 926: 918: 894: 865:is, in fact, a 851: 806: 778: 758:Esprit de corps 746: 680:|article name}} 675: 663: 657: 632: 615: 543: 513: 508: 505: 408: 396: 388: 386: 373: 356: 338: 277: 255: 241: 227: 217: 190: 178: 148: 131: 128: 125: 117: 100: 84: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1808: 1806: 1783: 1780: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1707: 1704: 1667: 1664: 1649:User:Jarry1250 1612: 1609: 1589: 1586: 1547: 1516: 1512:Decline reason 1504: 1500:Request reason 1497: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1258:You have been 1250: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1225: 1180: 1179: 1130: 1129: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1008: 1007: 973: 970: 950:and have been 893: 890: 861:tags. Second, 850: 844: 805: 802: 773: 772: 745: 742: 631: 628: 614: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 542: 539: 504: 501: 473: 472: 471: 470: 453: 452: 407: 406:Your user page 404: 394: 384: 372: 367: 355: 354:Lens materials 352: 337: 334: 333: 332: 276: 273: 254: 251: 240: 237: 231:Royboycrashfan 225: 216: 213: 177: 171: 147: 141: 140: 139: 99: 96: 83: 80: 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1807: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1711: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1632: 1622: 1617: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1587: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1571: 1570: 1563: 1556: 1554: 1545: 1544: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1454: 1453:global blocks 1450: 1449:active blocks 1446: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1430: 1429:administrator 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1375: 1370: 1364: 1363: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1321: 1320: 1315: 1309: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1254: 1247:November 2009 1246: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1230: 1227:And who says 1226: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199:3 revert rule 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1133: 1126: 1120: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1058: 1057: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 983: 979: 971: 969: 967: 963: 962: 961:User:Husounde 957: 953: 949: 945: 944:User:Husounde 940: 935: 934: 929: 923: 922: 916: 912: 908: 904: 899: 891: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 859: 858: 849: 845: 843: 842: 839: 833: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815:do not attack 811: 803: 801: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 782: 781: 770: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754:Dana Jacobson 751: 743: 741: 740: 736: 735: 730: 729: 725:. Thank you. 724: 720: 718: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 691: 689: 685: 679: 673: 669: 662: 654: 651: 647: 646: 636: 629: 627: 626: 623: 612: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 574: 573: 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 558: 557: 553: 549: 540: 538: 537: 534: 531: 527: 521: 520: 517: 516: 502: 500: 499: 496: 490: 489: 484: 480: 469: 465: 461: 457: 456: 455: 454: 451: 448: 442: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 427: 423: 422: 418: 414: 405: 403: 402: 398: 391: 382: 378: 371: 368: 366: 365: 362: 353: 351: 350: 347: 343: 335: 331: 328: 327:Humus sapiens 324: 323:verifiability 320: 316: 312: 307: 303: 302: 301: 300: 297: 296:Humus sapiens 293: 290:? Please see 289: 287: 285: 282: 274: 272: 271: 268: 264: 260: 253:Fuzzy Zoeller 252: 250: 249: 246: 238: 236: 235: 232: 224: 222: 214: 212: 211: 208: 203: 200: 199: 196: 193: 188: 184: 175: 172: 170: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 146: 142: 137: 134: 123: 120: 113: 112: 111: 109: 105: 97: 95: 94: 91: 87: 81: 79: 78: 75: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 1785: 1732: 1712: 1709: 1689:my talk page 1669: 1666:January 2013 1646: 1635: 1633: 1618: 1614: 1591: 1573: 1568: 1550: 1548: 1533: 1523: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1505: 1499: 1498: 1471:creation log 1438: 1426: 1361: 1322: 1318: 1274:edit warring 1265: 1259: 1232: 1228: 1181: 1168: 1164: 1156: 1134: 1131: 1117: 1055: 1020: 975: 959: 936: 920: 907:edit summary 895: 874: 870: 866: 862: 856: 852: 847: 830: 822: 807: 785: 783: 776: 774: 749: 747: 733: 727: 714: 698: 692: 655: 643: 641: 616: 546:argument. -- 544: 522: 511: 506: 491: 474: 463: 428: 424: 409: 374: 357: 341: 339: 319:undue weight 310: 305: 278: 256: 245:Tom Harrison 242: 228: 218: 204: 201: 183:edit summary 179: 149: 101: 88: 85: 59: 20: 16: 15: 1693:Mutt Lunker 1691:. Thanks! 1677:Mutt Lunker 1675:Hello, I'm 1588:Minor edits 892:August 2009 219:Step 1 for 195:ruvianLlama 174:Faraz anwar 108:North Korea 1753:topic bans 1598:Dougweller 1467:filter log 1272:caused by 1270:disruption 1203:WP:LINKVIO 267:Jokestress 265:. Thanks! 239:Northwoods 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 1786:2019 now 1749:site bans 1653:LivingBot 1551:read the 1486:checkuser 1445:block log 1290:consensus 1288:and seek 1268:for your 1153:The Truth 948:vandalism 879:Bellhalla 804:June 2008 695:this link 661:GFDL-self 650:copyright 613:Poor form 514:Shankbone 311:Protocols 70:help desk 1788:Husounde 1642:WP:MINOR 1520:3RR rule 1457:contribs 1266:48 hours 952:reverted 911:reverted 871:Montanan 857:Montanan 848:Montanan 717:48 hours 530:Picaroon 441:sNkrSnee 361:Dicklyon 292:WP:UNDUE 223:states: 74:Shimgray 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1719:Mabuska 1685:Sausage 1575:Sukiari 1562:unblock 1480:unblock 1440:Sukiari 1398:Sukiari 1346:Sukiari 1316:first. 1308:unblock 1261:blocked 1184:Sukiari 1138:Sukiari 1090:Sukiari 1075:Sukiari 1040:Sukiari 997:Sukiari 956:sandbox 915:sandbox 875:Collide 827:blocked 813:Please 791:Sukiari 752:of the 713:) then 618:page.-- 495:Sukiari 460:Sukiari 430:Sukiari 346:Lugnuts 207:Sukiari 176:article 90:Sukiari 82:Thanks! 23:welcome 1739:. The 1362:Verbal 1215:ChrisO 1118:Verbal 1056:Verbal 1021:Verbal 1015:WP:AN3 978:WP:3RR 921:Verbal 863:allide 779:Enigma 744:Thanks 734:Parrot 686:. See 595:Golbez 577:Golbez 563:Golbez 548:Golbez 541:Tragic 413:Stifle 263:WP:NPA 259:WP:BLP 1629:false 1555:first 750:truth 728:Polly 709:(per 591:WP:DR 509:David 446:¿qué? 395:words 377:Uglor 304:What 279:That 1792:talk 1773:talk 1715:here 1697:talk 1657:talk 1625:true 1602:talk 1579:talk 1518:The 1402:talk 1368:chat 1350:talk 1326:Talk 1229:they 1219:talk 1188:talk 1165:were 1142:talk 1124:chat 1094:talk 1079:talk 1062:chat 1044:talk 1027:chat 1001:talk 986:talk 966:talk 927:chat 883:talk 867:real 823:will 795:talk 762:talk 668:GFDL 599:talk 593:. -- 581:talk 567:talk 552:talk 483:talk 464:talk 417:talk 389:shoy 321:and 261:and 164:talk 1733:Hi, 1683:to 1539:Man 1524:any 1490:log 1437:). 1280:at 1157:not 972:3RR 855:SS 846:SS 825:be 533:(t) 479:CBM 325:. ← 294:. ← 160:jiy 122:Who 1794:) 1775:) 1751:, 1699:) 1659:) 1651:, 1604:) 1581:) 1565:}} 1559:{{ 1529:TN 1514:: 1502:: 1484:• 1478:• 1474:• 1469:• 1465:• 1460:• 1455:• 1451:• 1447:• 1404:) 1352:) 1319:NW 1306:{{ 1221:) 1190:) 1159:a 1144:) 1096:) 1081:) 1046:) 1017:. 1003:) 988:) 968:) 885:) 837:VS 834:-- 797:) 764:) 737:) 697:. 676:{{ 664:}} 658:{{ 621:VS 601:) 583:) 569:) 554:) 481:· 466:) 443:| 419:) 393:( 317:, 166:) 1790:( 1771:( 1695:( 1655:( 1600:( 1577:( 1534:X 1494:) 1492:) 1488:( 1443:( 1400:( 1348:( 1329:) 1323:( 1238:: 1217:( 1186:( 1174:: 1140:( 1092:( 1077:( 1042:( 999:( 984:( 964:( 881:( 793:( 760:( 731:( 597:( 579:( 565:( 550:( 485:) 477:( 462:( 415:( 397:) 340:" 191:e 187:P 162:( 132:? 129:¿ 126:? 118:∞

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name on talk pages
help desk
Shimgray
23:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Sukiari
07:37, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Internet sock puppet
North Korea

Who
?¿?
04:44, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Category:Japanese World War II people
Category:Japanese World War II people
Knowledge:Categories for deletion
jiy
talk
23:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Faraz anwar
edit summary
P
e

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.