User talk:SustainaBro2017 - Knowledge (XXG)

2759:

section of this article. My perspective is that some photos are better than none. Having not had any photos in that section prior to my contributions creates a reflection on the article that athletics are unimportant at UB. While most of my text contributions to this overall article have been maintained, you deleted 2/3 of my photo contributions. So, I challenge you to replace them with updated and current photos since I am on the other side of the country and it would not be feasible for me to do so, otherwise I would. You have taken a leadership role with this article, and I challenge you to uphold it by improving and enhancing it with more updated photos than what I contributed. If you do not, then it would be obvious that a conflict about it may be preferred by you rather than compromise. Having had no images in the athletics section, in my opinion and prior to my image contributions, made it a section that was lacking in quality and which needed enhancement. That is where I'm coming from, and I challenge you to take charge and make it better.

2744:

else when I added Bill Greiner, and then re-added him again after you deleted him. I believe it is you who are in conflict. Please do not jump to conclusions before going back through all the edits to confirm this. Once you do that, you will see that I did not "replace" anyone. I only added Bill, and it was you who deleted him. Why did you delete him, reverting my two edits/additions of him? This is something that should be discussed on the talk page. The former president of UB who worked there for 42 years, who was president for 13 years, who made many advancements for the university, and who brought the school back to Division I, I believe is noteworthy enough for his photograph to be reflected in the notable alumni and faculty section. I am moving this discussion to the article's talk page.

3740:." Not only does that remove an abbreviation used throughout the university's documents, other reliable sources, and the article itself but it also removes a historical name that is detailed in the article. More confusing is that you removed that sentence while using the edit summary "the 'University at Buffalo' name is still commonly used, bring it up in the talk if you still have issue. You're promoting an edit war." which is exactly what the sentence says! 1874: 1732: 4239: 3509: 1391: 966: 3056: 1597: 4162: 3890: 2246: 404: 643: 491: 3272: 3109: 2636: 2558: 2918: 2473: 2100: 1780: 1264: 1073: 3564: 3170: 1694: 296:, nor does it show up commonly (if ever) in search returns or in casual conversation. There are many colleges and universities in Buffalo and that name just doesn't make any sense. Not trying to provoke or prolong an edit war, but I am also puzzled why anyone ever suggested it belonged on the page. Please help keep it off the page -- it's just wrong. Thanks! 3528:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 985:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2783: 2194: 1025: 312: 717: 684: 565: 532: 3763:

publication, document, apparel, etc. Secondly, the differentiation between the "University at Buffalo" and the "University of Buffalo" is marginal at best. Stating the difference, in my opinion, is not needed and is again redundant. This is my opinion of course. For your sake however, you edited the first sentecne

3830:

Let me throw my two cents in. As an employee of the university system, I was "strongly encouraged" to use "University AT Buffalo", since it's the State University of New York AT Buffalo. Buffalo does not have a university of it's own. The use "of" and "at" have completely different meanings last I

2758:

Davidhar, Again, I think your assumptions with regard to what I had attempted to achieve in contributing my images to the article are incorrect. Instead of complaining and continuing an argument that is going nowhere, I challenge you to take and upload photos of some UB sports teams to the athletics

2743:

Davidhar, You are mistaken. First of all, you do not own any articles, nor have any authority in telling me what to do or how to edit. Second of all, I did not replace Terry Gross, nor did I realize or know that Terry Gross had been in that section. Terry Gross had already been deleted by someone

2727:

with Bill Greiner. Your recent edits both on the University's wikipedia and on William Greiner's suggests a conflict of interest and I would advise to not edit wikipedia pages with respect to Bill Greiner if this is the case (per WP codes). Terry Gross, the original alumnus who was replaced by Bill

3863:

Ok, someone's adding more common names again for UB. They wrote that "Other names like 'Buffalo University', 'UBuffalo' and 'UBuff' are also commonly seen." This is not true. "University OF Buffalo" is mistakenly used... that's the only common name. We DO use a hash tag of UBuffalo... but not in

45:

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that

3681:

to revising the U of T article to represent the entire University. At present, the wikipedia leaves out roughly half of the entire U of T population...and that's inaccurate and inappropriate by wikipedia standards. While the U of T isn't a University system (like I've said repeatedly), even if it

3643:

Thanks again for starting the merge of campuses. I'm not up to the job, but I totally agree it's worth doing. It would need a plan, and I'd hate to see someone's hard work get deleted by some other editor who complained because there wasn't consensus from the start. I'd try the university work

3192:

content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about

1281:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

3365:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

2969:

2524:

3762:

First of all, you edited the page using the title "Buffalo University, The State University of New York at Buffalo"....show me a source that says that...cuz in my view, that is the most idiotic and redundant name ever created for a university, and as a student, have never seen that in any

2255:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 266:

With that said, it would be good if you were clear about any potential or real conflicts of interest, David. Transparency is extremely important in this large and diverse community of people because we rarely meet and have to be very intentional about building and maintaining trust.

3138:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

855:

I actually have taken my own photos and have, in fact, placed them onto the page. They were taken off and deleted by Mtking for no apparent reason. And this time, it was a mistake. I thought all rights reserved meant that I can put them up. Simple misunderstanding. Thanks.

1292:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

938:

I was taking the time to explain why I reverted your change, it is a long-standing WP policy to delete any copyright file that is not used on an article, so before a file which has been used since 2007 is deleted, it needs to be clear that there is consensus to change it.

2505:, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2221:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.

1052:

3864:

normal human speech. Since Buffalo has several universities, 'Buffalo University' is NOT misapplied, and I have never heard anyone refer to UBuff. Someone is making those up. Can you help..? Or advise what else we can do to reign this nonsense in..? Thanks.

3793:

I'll take this to the article's Talk page where you can explain to everyone why you think the lead of this article shouldn't introduce the prominent alternate names of this subject, its prominent historic name, and the abbreviation used throughout the article.

1620: 339:

4174:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1662:

You are obviously under the microscope now so your best bet is to strictly adhere to the standards and if you need assistance you should ask for someone (more experienced than I am) to mentor or assist you. You can always ask for assistance here:

1654:

Hi, Davidhar, I merged the deleted article into the main article so all of that material would be preserved. My suggestion is that you familiarize yourself with the rules of notability and using references that establish notability. See here:

1623:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

3082:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2950:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 709:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

557:

47: 3597: 3785:

You haven't explained why your actions and your stated reasons are in direct contradiction. I didn't name the article or the university (which does appear to have that as its full, legal name whether you've heard of it or not). And

2017:" that is the sources address the subject directly in detail, this is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. So sources relating to ranking tables are not likely to cover this point. 3603: 754:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

602:

3130:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

3312:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 417:. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text 827:

and if they continue are very likely to see you blocked. Should you wish to follow the advice of RHaworth and upload photos taken yourself, please make sure that they are relevant to the article and that you check at the

1512: 1627:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1508: 4202: 3086:

3982:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1278:, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (XXG) (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 1784: 3610:

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

258:

Nonsense. If he has a conflict of interest then he should certainly be careful in editing the article but that is no reason to "keep well clear of the article." The very link you used for this section -

4186:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3831:

checked. Here's my nickel to including "at" as a current usage, and "of" as a previous use, which is the way I've understood it since I was informed of the correct usage of University "at" Buffalo.

884:

Clearly you have forgotten, they were deleted from Commons because they were marked copyright to the university they may have been taken by you, but you were acting for the university at the time.

2955: 2112: 903:

I'm actually not talking about those. I took pictures that were clearly MINE and placed them on the page in May of 2011. You not only took them off the page, but you deleted them without reason.

829: 3468: 3464: 46:

page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask

2271: 3568: 3174: 2141: 1362: 1312: 1084: 820: 366: 165: 2427:, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 2377:, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 1962: 1555: 1604: 1588: 1548: 1500: 3334:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

4284: 42:

and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

4246: 4232: 1418:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

3079: 655:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 503:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 1414:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 667: 515: 744: 592: 1365:, can you please propose any changes you wish to make, including adding any images, at the talk page first so it can be discussed before the change happens. 794:

Please do not waste your time and ours uploading images with incompatible licences. As to buildings: go out and take your own photographs and upload them to

4085: 4040: 3400: 3343: 3068: 3020: 2881: 2336: 2068: 1609: 1522: 3947:

If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

1961:

I thought it might help, if I gave you some pointers to the types of sources that would be required to demonstrate that the School of Management meets the

3339: 3144: 912: 1955: 1887: 1798: 1749: 128: 1943: 2058: 70: 4305: 3540: 3261: 3194: 2951: 2947: 2907: 2462: 1253: 997: 819:

I would like to add to that, your constant uploads both here and at Commons of copyright images so as to beautify the article of the uni you attend (

764: 612: 112: 3743:

Please explain your bizarre insistence that the article lead not have the commonly used name, formerly used name, and abbreviation in the lead like

2430:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

2380:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

2054: 4129:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

3922: 2871: 2326: 772: 620: 4081: 4036: 3396: 3016: 2877: 2332: 2064: 1518: 3416: 2653:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

2575:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

4216: 4007: 3460: 3347: 3010: 2867: 2569: 2551: 2374: 2362: 2322: 2261: 132: 3412: 2647: 2629: 2424: 2412: 691:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 539:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 414: 413:. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at 4259: 3602: 3596: 3389:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2217: 2211: 1048: 1042: 335: 329: 53:

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately

3677:

I stated in the talk that I've rescinded my proposition to form a merger. Instead, I'd like to keep the UTM and UTSC campus articles,

3444: 3006: 3921:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

3228: 3189: 2974:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 2529:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 2238: 131:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

4309: 3182: 2510: 1124: 3440: 2212: 1043: 330: 2218: 1049: 336: 2108: 748: 740: 596: 588: 457: 4212: 4003: 3628: 3375: 1284: 4195: 4123: 3281: 3013:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2927: 2874:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2671:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2593:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2482: 2329:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2061:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1515:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1136: 1092: 97: 23: 4078:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4033:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3393:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3178: 2008:

sources, sources know for there accuracy, for example Blogs and other self published works would not be considered reliable.

872: 809: 88:

on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

28: 4297: 4250: 4228: 3879: 3524:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3243: 1406:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1140: 981:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 62: 658:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

506:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

1675: 1271: 1257: 734: 582: 4301: 3529: 3367: 2971: 2526: 1419: 986: 768: 728: 616: 576: 453: 3691: 3207:

articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.

2166: 2133: 2033: 1981: 1927: 1904: 1845: 1812: 1766: 1639: 1579: 1376: 1342: 1304: 1242: 1224: 1206: 1165: 1011: 950: 926: 895: 847: 477: 434: 384: 251: 224: 201: 179: 150: 3994:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3327: 3072: 2117: 1792: 1613: 1565: 1146: 117: 58: 4207: 3999: 3687: 934:

You have no right to delete it. Go to the talk page on the UNIVERSITY. Please refrain from going to my own talk page.

651: 499: 3390: 3288: 2934: 2489: 1088: 466:" as a colour has received coverage outside of the Uni, then as a subject it does not warrant a stand-alone article. 2678:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

2600:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

4070:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4021:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3576: 3371: 3092: 2997:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2854:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2313:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3236: 3232: 3135: 1153:

You are edit warring over this, there is an ongoing talk page discussion about it, Please revert your last change.

3849: 34:

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a

1402: 1132: 1104: 1080: 977: 92: 3695: 3423: 3152: 2521: 2498: 2466: 1671: 1195:

edit, you started that process by posting to the talk page, that needs to continue before you make the change.

4183: 3143:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

124: 3520: 3309: 2807:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2764: 2749: 3720:

Why are you removing any mention of other names currently used, names formerly used, or abbreviations used

3580: 3305: 3177:

your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things

3140: 2441: 2391: 2202: 1033: 860: 320: 293:. I work in UB's marketing office, and can authoritatively state that "Buffalo University" is not our name 3475: 3227:

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to

1995: 232:

Why do you need to know these things? I don't have to reveal any personal information if I don't want to.

4313: 3995: 3926: 3660: 3572: 3351: 3242:

For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have a conflict of interest, please see

2672: 2594: 2440:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2390:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2198: 2173:

Hi MTKing, please see my uploaded pictures on the talk page and please contribute your thoughts on them.

1128: 1096: 1029: 316: 3668: 3649: 3088: 2983: 2720: 1712: 699: 547: 4134: 1944:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/University_at_Buffalo_School_of_Management

663: 511: 107: 1319:

The addition of the the crest as a stand alone image should be reverted, as it fails two parts of the

3845: 3683: 3342:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 2840: 2696: 2618: 2452: 2402: 1988: 1783:

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to

4170: 4152: 3971: 3962: 3905: 3901: 3254: 1788: 1554:

I noticed you created this article a few days ago; however it does not as yet appear to address the

692: 540: 54: 4321: 3682:

were treated as a university system, all university systems have one single comprehensive article (

3624: 3148: 3116: 2151:

the schools prospectus, since you are a student of the uni, please seek consensus on the talk page

4179: 3991: 3975: 3575:

and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at

3362: 3297: 3265: 3257:. Desist from this act to avoid been blocked on wikipedia. (Wikicology 09:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC)) 3120: 3102: 3063: 3047: 2434: 2384: 1411: 4142: 4130: 3813: 3772: 3703: 2760: 2745: 2733: 2178: 1858: 1824: 1177: 868: 803: 780: 628: 4116: 4071: 3366:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3193:

that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by

2970:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2525:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1099:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

915:

probably being deleted as an orphan fair use, this change needs to be agreed at the talk page.

4280: 4101: 4056: 3937: 3869: 3799: 3752: 3548: 3492: 3036: 2897: 2352: 2227: 2084: 1538: 1485: 1472: 1058: 345: 301: 294: 272: 4191: 3987: 3979: 3787: 3214: 2975: 2530: 1880: 1873: 1853:

No, I know what it means. I meant, please tell me why you THINK it is an irrelevant article.

1415: 1328: 1324: 1320: 795: 39: 4126:

tools, as having some issues to fix. Is there no coverage on Heaps in the mainstream press?

3664: 3645: 3200:

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

2979: 2161: 2128: 2046: 2028: 1922: 1899: 1840: 1807: 1761: 1738: 1731: 1707: 1634: 1574: 1390: 1371: 1337: 1299: 1237: 1219: 1201: 1160: 1006: 945: 921: 890: 842: 472: 429: 379: 246: 219: 196: 174: 145: 136: 4267: 4194:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4187: 3990:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3983: 3910: 3301: 3250: 3162: 2643: 2565: 2506: 2502: 2284: 2252: 2013: 1621:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/University at Buffalo College of Arts & Sciences

1435:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a 1432: 1358: 1350: 1275: 447: 410: 396: 362: 355: 260: 237: 158: 35: 3952: 2836: 2832: 2787: 2692: 2614: 2448: 2420: 2398: 2370: 2293: 1468: 1438: 460:

of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article

80: 3747:

does. And explain why you're making edits that directly contradict your own statements.

3525: 2005: 1407: 982: 761:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

609:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

74:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type 57:. It is also worth noting that Knowledge (XXG) generally does not allow editors to have 4317: 3897: 3883: 3616: 2966: 2943: 2911: 2796: 1564:"; because if it is not, it should not have it's own article. Please try and avoid the 4266:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3930: 3915: 3594:

With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (

3300:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

3213:

to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see

2946:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

2501:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1968:

First they need to be from a independent source, so that would not be anything from :

1274:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

443: 4138: 4092: