467:, non-free must meet all points, including having critical commentary. We have exceptions for identification purposes, but only when the subject is notable enough to have it's own article, and actually has it. We see this with television show screenshots, company logos, movies, CDs (CDs with Alternate covers), etc. If you go an create a sourced, notable article right now, I would happily restore the image so you could add it. The content must always come before the non-free image, otherwise we could be waiting perpetually for the content to be created. Its the same concept that allows admins to delete drafts if they haven't been touched in 6 months. If the article had been created before discussion had ended, the consensus would've been different (as long as the article wasn't nominated for deletion) because the arguments of WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack would be void as they would not apply to this situation. I understand that it helps to have information as to why something was close, but honestly, this close was so obvious. You were the only one who brought up your argument, which really didn't help since you stated the exact information that it failed. Others brought up counter points that were never refuted with policy, it was an open and shut case in my opinion. I see that isn't the case for everyone involved, but that's just how it is sometimes. If you decide to make a standalone article (as long as you could find the sources, I believe it is notable enough), let me know and I will happily restore the image for you for that article. Cheers,
3963:
town grew up around it. Photos of students standing in front of their school bus in front of the school (dated 1940) support my supposition that this was taken in 1939. This picture shows the school when it was new, and it hung in the school when I went there in the 1970's. This is an important image because although this building is still the heart of the school today, it has been largely obscured by the ugly addition added in front. I may be able to discover the picture's provenance at the reunion next week, but it is equally possible there may not be any record. If I had a week or two in which to do the requisite research, I could probably establish it is in the public domain with circumstantial evidence. Maybe find out if it was taken by a local photographer, or by the local paper. But even if this image were somehow still improbably under copyright, fair use/fair dealing exemptions would make it usable, as a great many clearly copyrighted images are, in the
Knowledge article (even if not Wikimedia Commons) because this is a piece of history and nothing equivalent exists. ā Laurel L. Russwurm
1516:
commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to
Knowledge or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Scott Turner, jsturner@syr.edu. 887 Tully Farms Road, Tully, New York 13159 USA SENDER'S AUTHORITY: Copyright-holder I am the copyright holder : 13 May 2014" I can forward the email which includes this letter with signature - to which address do I send it? And what would be the next step? Thanks for your response and guidance! All the best.
3151:. There is no copyright on the image. As I mentioned in previous postings on talk pages, I had discussed the image and it was viewed by Howicus and Huron in Wiki help IRC and they said the image was ok for posting. Michele sent the image to me, as she had no idea as how to navigate in Knowledge or in Commons at the time. She wanted to get the page presentable for viewing. I eventually had to draft detailed instructions for Michele and Mary Frances since they are not computer savvy, and then be on the phone with them in order to get the photos uploaded and placed on the page. For the last four years, I have been asked if I would do this Wiki page, since I attended both days of the 1985 event, had numerous pictures, and had previous experience with Knowledge. For the pictures listing me as the author, they are my own photos (press pass) that I took during the two day event.
5008:
Ziegfeld & Sandow c. 1893.jpg so we can truly know if the photo is in the public domain or not. Also, "free of copyright" doesn't truly have a legal meaning, as everything has, or has had a copyright, unless it is specifically released into the public domain. I've gone through all of your uploads, and cleaned up a bunch of material and licenses. Most of the photos that were over 100 years old were incorrectly licensed. Everything else is good, as far as I can tell. I know this is upsetting to have your work dissected like this, especially so late in the game, but this is part of the process we have to go through to ensure all media we are hosting is free. Somehow your files have slipped through the cracks for many years. With patience we will get through this, and I'm happy to help see this through fruition. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 02:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
3293:
working with
Justine. Apparently, the map has been sitting in a box for almost 30 years, just like the video. Michele dug through boxes looking for items to use on the Wiki page and found the map. Were you able to find the file and look at the map? I just took a chance and called the former director of The Center for a New Creation, that was in Alexandria, VA and coordinated the DC event. She has been at a UN meeting in NY, but I lucked out, and she answered. She said that the map was a US Park Service map, which has no copyright and she used the original map for another event. Before Michele found the map, I contacted the Park Service about using one of their maps for the Wiki page and the Park Service said there was no copyright because it is government property and has free use. Let me know if you have any more questions.
5041:, there is a simple letter they can use and send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Or if they reply to you with enough information, you can forward it to that same address (or if you find an old email, forward that). Second, thank you for your work John, and I sincerely mean it. You've done great things for Knowledge getting all of these photos together. I know this can get people down, but realize the majority of your uploads were good, a few needed minor tweaks, but overall you were good. I wish this process had happened back in 2005 when you first uploaded, as surely it would've been much easier for you to handle then. Also know that if any image is deleted, and we get permission afterwards, I will personally restore the image. I don't want to lose any content that we have permission for. Cheers,
3931:
so we don't know if it has been 49 years since the author's death. Simply because the school was built 75 years ago, does not guarantee that this image is from 1939. This could've been taken later, or edited. We just don't know. According to the article, the first additions were not until the 1950s, which means the photo could've been taken between 1939 and 1950s and may still be copyrighted. Also, most of the article is largely unsourced, so we cannot even go by that information. If we have a reliable source that includes where the photo came from, when it was taken and who took the photo, we can put it back (if the file is in the public domain), but without that information, we have to treat the file as if it is not free, and therefore it would be replaceable by a current photo of the school (see
1211:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan2/catscan2.php?categories=All+free+media&negcats=Self-published+work%0D%0AFreely+licensed+images+of+non-free+subject&ns=1&templates_no=Copy+to+Wikimedia+Commons%0D%0A%3C!--Already+has+information+--%3E%0D%0AInformation%0D%0AGoogle+Art+Project%0D%0A%3C!--+Blocks+on+Commons+Transfer--%3E%0D%0ANon-free+use+rationale%0D%0ANon-free+use+rationale+2%0D%0APD-ineligible-USonly%0D%0ASplit+media%0D%0A%3C!--Shouldn%27t+be+moved--%3E%0D%0Aprotected+generic+image+name%0D%0AKeep+local%0D%0Aesoteric+file%0D%0Auserspace+file%0D%0A%3C!--In+process.--%3E%0D%0Apuf%0D%0Affd%0D%0ANFUR+not+needed&sortby=uploaddate&ext_image_data=1&file_usage_data=1
173:
136:
2282:). Therefore the cover image is in the public domain. Unfortunately the photo of the cover is not, mostly due to the fact it is not simply a 2D reproduction. The effects of lighting and angle, etc, have been determined by US Courts as being enough to grant a new copyright. Therefore we have a public domain CD cover (not too uncommon these days) in a non-free photo. Therefore Peripitus' claim that the photo could be replaced by a free one (of anyone taking a photo and releasing the photo under a free license) per policy at
110:
1443:
page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 00:11, 12 May 2014 TLSuda (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Kameshwar C. Wali, New York, 27 April 2014.jpg (F11: No evidence of permission for more than 7 days)". I have an email from the copyright owner (currently doing fieldwork in
Namibia) with his signed permission to upload the image. How do I proceed? Thanks in advance for your help.
215:
192:
3326:
is we are trying to find out who owns it and/or if it has been released under a free license). 2) The former director of The Center for a New
Creation (which coordinated the event) claims the map came from the US Park Service (still has copyright), but being a government created file, it would be in the public domain (and therefore usable). Is this all correct? If so, is there any way that we can get an email from the former director attesting to this information?
255:
1989:
154:
2933:
810:
available. If your claim that his features at a very specific point in his career are notable, I would recommend finding reliable third-party sources that a)show this notability and b)source the information that would then make it required to have the non-free image. I hope this at least gives you a better idea of how non-free content is handled, and at least a process that could possibly cause a situation where the image is necessary. Cheers,
31:
3138:
photos. I have no problem going back and adding the information you mentioned. As more copy in added to the page for length, I may take a few more cuts from the video. The other photos are a combination of mine, Mary
Frances Jaster - former National Co-coordinator for the 1985 event, and Michele Peppers, the current Executive Director. Do you want me to designate, which photos belong to each individual person?
4590:
Knowledge if deleted or altered, similar to a template with a high-transclusion rate or an image that is used for a system function. One such group of examples that I can provide are the images of padlocks that are used to represent when a page has some sort of protection implemented on it. (I mean, can you imagine if some vandal found a way to replace the padlock images with ... let's say chickens?)
285:
270:
234:
558:, but to determine that we would need to see the sourced commentary in the article that requires the use of the image to understand. There currently isn't text on that, and the text would need to come first, before the non-free image was uploaded. Fortunately I don't think that you have to worry about that, as it seems to be a free image created by the US Government. Cheers,
2342:
came from, do you? There is no author of the image. The other image (only one was listed) has a clear author, CBS. We need to know when it was first published, if it was this image, then by whom? There is simply not enough information to ascertain correct copyright. When we do not have this information, we remove the image until/if such time we have that information. Cheers,
2286:. If you could find a direct 2D cover, like a scan, this would be considered a slavish reproduction and wouldn't be granted a new copyright, and would therefore be in the public domain. Basically we have two ways to create a free image, and as such, the image is replaceable and in violation of our non-free media policies. I hope this helps. Cheers,
3467:
2191:
1951:
1401:
1293:
797:, which is subjective, except it requires source critical commentary. His specific face paint is only mentioned twice in the article, and only one mention is sourced. That source is about the court proceeding with respect to his ownership of the gimmick. One does not have to see the face paint to understand that he wore it, but if they did
2378:
Quite possibly. Could it have been made by someone else? Maybe. Could the image have first been printed elsewhere, or is there information missing from the photo? Possibly. The free image that was linked in the discussion had a CBS sticker on it, ergo, I would be surprised to not see the same or similar sticker if it were a CBS works.
802:
but this isn't sourced, nor would an non-free image be required to understand that there was a change in his appearance that caused rumors. Its also used in the infobox (for identification) and is never referenced in the article, so any image could identify the person, as opposed to being required to understanding the article.
3781:
waste my time asking me to post my disagreement, just to see it summarily deleted. i understand there isn't time to haggle about every file, but if one tries to get it right, you shouldn't throw the book at him. i consider myself fairly experienced (2006), and have never been as frustrated (in contributing). --
5273:
This is gonna sound kinda sad, but I would actually be more likely to participate if there were a meetup. I love to think that I would work on it from my home by myself, but I often get too involved in various admin responsibilities and I don't get much time to just edit anymore. I live about an hour
4985:
Unfortunately, Knowledge seem to be becoming stricter about their copyright requirements and have questioned a number of photos I uploaded by other photographers (because I thought they would be enjoyed and of interest to a really wide audience), even though I sought and received permission from each
3962:
Photographs taken in Canada before 1949 are in the Public Domain. Work-for-hire photographs owned by institutions taken after 1949 have a 50 year term. While this photo may have been taken in 1939, or even 1940 it certainly wasn't taken much later, both because of the plantings evident and that the
3802:
states that we can only keep a non-free image if it cannot be replaced by a free image. This policy does not mean that an image must exist currently, just that one could be created. The jet was manufactured from 1964-1994 and wass used by a couple of airlines, so a new photograph could be created of
3780:
bsd. i see you deleted the pic i uploaded, if i understood correctly, because it violates "No free equivalent". the original notice it said that if i disagree, i should put a notice and explain it in the talk page, which i did to the best of my ability. only to find it arbitrarily deleted. why do you
2975:
I was wondering if you would be so kind and offer some assistance, I was just in Wiki and
Commons help for an hour with no response for a Commons Admin. Previously, I posted a message on the Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard that now has not been answered, as to a question I posted. The information concerning
2535:
I've sent permission from the photographer to use the GregKurstin2013.jpg to permissions-en@wikipedia.org twice now, once when I uploaded it and again when I got the warning message re: deleting the photo last week. I'm not sure why it's not getting logged. Is there another email I can send it to?
2362:
The uploaded "key note" photo was scanned by me from the original, which I bought for my collection, therefore better quality. I included a link to the ebay professional dealers, who generally give more background details. The term "key note," in this case with a date, refers to the fact that it's an
2341:
3) There is no original source of the image. The linked source (for the first uploaded image) is from eBay. This image is plastered in watermarking and yet the second upload is perfectly clean and a much larger resolution (although your description says "crop"). I have no idea where this second image
1515:
I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a
1046:
Publish can have many different meanings, unfortunately. Publish can be in a book, or put on display. It can also mean printed (or developed) and disseminated. Basically, to my knowledge the only way to be sure that something is unpublished is for there to be only one copy and it has never been seen
1006:
The file is out of copyright in the United
Kingdom, but on En.WP we have to be concerned with copyright in the US, specifically because the servers that host the files are in the US and subject to US copyright law. If it was taken in 1929 by an unknown author, and was never published, it entered the
711:
The OTRS permissions tag is correct, I must've accidentally left the pending tag. That was the only image that was released in that OTRS email, none others. I thought it was a bit odd as well, and I will probably reach out to the sender for more information. Currently, though, everything is how it
433:
because it is being used in identification of a notable soundtrack that could have its own article, but no one had split it off from the film article, and the album cover is significantly different from the film poster. Since it is being used as idenfitication it does not need critical commentary of
5003:
I saw that you included the text of an email on the description, but email permission must be sent through WP:CONSENT. In this case, the permission would not be approved because the original copyright holder did not release the image under a specific free license. They get to choose, not us. We need
3973:
and cannot be verified. I believe that you are quite possibly correct about the date, but we need proof of the date. Hopefully you can find it as you have suggested. As for using the image as non-free, I'm afraid it still could not be used in the article's current state. It was used in the infobox
3930:
tag, (which was applied by a different user) specifically says "The media description page should identify which reason applies." There was no identification on which reason. The image is most likely not Crown
Copyright. We have no idea when the photo was created. We also don't have a listed author,
3807:
source). The image that you uploaded is of a plane that is currently at Hamburg Airport in a hanger. Someone could easily find one of this planes and take a new photo, or you or another editor could reach out to the website/copyright holder (their email is listed on the website) as see if they would
2377:
That is good information, although I don't understand why you didn't just scan both sides of your perfectly usable image instead of using their watermarked version. We still don't know who originally produced the image. We don't have a source/author for the creation of the photo. Was it made by CBS?
2251:
is not a vote. It is up to the closing administrator to weigh all of the arguments in the discussion, and interpret consensus based on the quality of the arguments with respect to policy. In this case, Peripitus, was more correct, with policy. The CD itself would be in the public domain. The design
1703:
The file was deleted because the image fails WP:NFCC#1, meaning that the image can be replaced with a free image. If you took the photo, the only reason that the file is non-free is because of the logos of the casinos. If you recreated the same image with a standard deck of playing cards (or had a
1460:
I uploaded the image file originally on 4 May 2014 and sent several emails to Knowledge concerning the process of obtaining necessary permission and furnishing various bits of proof that such permission had been granted - but I received no reply whatsoever. It was then duly deleted after seven days.
777:
Nothing is ever "resolved," especially if a discussion is not closed. Just like you thought the issue was resolved, I'm sure the nominator thought that you didn't truly show his discussion to be wrong, and that it was settled. First, the article is about a person, who is both a professional wrestler
744:
If you'll look at the current article, you'll see its "equivalent" depicts a middle-aged, short-haired, paintless bearded man wearing a drab suit and jacket. This depiction, containing none of the subject's inherently distinctive features, is only how Warrior appeared for three very late days of his
400:
about having a standalone article, which there isn't. Other editors also pointed out that the cover is not the subject of sourced critical commentary, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Your only counter argument was to quote WP:NFCC#8, but you never stated why. Therefore, the consensus of this discussion,
4941:
I feel sure that, because of the care I took gaining permission, there should be no problems for Knowledge and, in the unlikely event of ever any such thing occurring, would not my personal word that i did my very best and, in good faith, thought I had obtained proper permission for each photo, not
4779:
and I believe that's correct & have moved them. Seeing that you then nominated them (well 1 out of 4 so far) for deletion on Commons, I've now asked user to send OTRS permission for them too - he's familiar with the process so hopefully it'll get sorted. Thanks & apologies for perhaps being
4316:
Rod, I am very sorry. I do my reviews off-wiki and then copy them over. This time I must've forgot when I finished as I thought I already had. I wish I had noticed sooner as I know you were patiently waiting. Thanks for letting me know that I forgot. Its up now. Let me know if you have questions,
3325:
I hope you understand this is all a bit confusing, so I want to make sure that I completely understand. 1) Michele got the map image from a box from the event from 1985, but says it has no copyright, even though she doesn't know where it came from. (Everything created has a copyright, the situation
3292:
From what Michele told me about the map, it was in a box of items from the 1985 event, as she has numerous boxes of items from the 1985 event. She also told me that was no copyright on the map and she has no idea as to where it came from. She also participated in the 1985 event, and thereafter, was
3004:
As for this specific situation, I am happy to help, but I need more information. We have permission from the copyright holder that the video is released under an appropriate free license. We need to know what images that you've uploaded come from that video. This includes images that are currently
2998:
Hi Susan. As far as I can tell, its a bit messy. First, whenever you get a reply from OTRS, reply to that email (using the same subject). This will cause the emails about the same subject to be kept together, so there is no confusion. Second, sometimes you have to be patient. We're all volunteers
2859:
That ticket has three licenses. PD, CC-by-SA-3.0 & GFDL. That ticket is only for the web image (the original one) the one I uploaded over is apparently different (less cropped) though I thought it was just a larger resolution. The one I uploaded is on Flickr with a CC-by-2.0 license. We need
934:
America's pirate children can dock at any port on the Web, or many of the fewer actual ports on Earth. Faced with that kind of challenge, we can either get tough and fail (looking like a bumbling villain to the public) or lower the bar and appear to be "in tune" instead. Saying you'll put your foot
801:
from later shows him, to quote the article itself, "in a mask depicting his trademark face paint." The features that you discuss as being important to be seen are not even discussed with a source in the article. His change in appearance is mentioned, but not discussed in the "Death rumors" section,
615:
Thanks, I appreciate it. It's going live next week. I've been in contact with the museum and they think they can dig up a bit more history for me so I'm waiting to see what they can find. But it's almost ready to go live. I'm trying to get all of the Pearl Harbor articles to good article status
4838:
guideline and then you would add the appropriate copyright and non-free use rationales to the image description page. It looks like some of these images would be able to be used under our non-free policy, but definitely not all of them. The images would need to be addresses on an individual basis.
4589:
to start a "rough draft" of this page. This page would explain to the reader, or any editor, the criteria that qualify an image to be designated a "high-risk image". According to the information that I see so far from what I copied over, a "high-risk image" is an image that would essentially break
4538:
using the text that was in that talk page section. I'll be honest, I feel that this subject really needs expanding, but I have no idea where to start. Would you by chance know of any editors who may be able to provide assistance in expanding this page, or would you have any input you could provide
3884:
I was surprised to see the picture had been deleted in January 2014 with the notation "File without a source for more than 7 days." The image was uploaded along with most of the rest of the article in 2007, which is substantially longer than 7 days. So I am wondering what this means exactly. Can
3674:
Are you certain you were correct in deleting the photograph of Ikuhiko Hata which I uploaded to Knowledge? As I noted numerous times, I had formal written permission from the copyright holder to upload and use the photograph on Knowledge. Is it really true that copyright images may not be uploaded
3355:
The former director for the center is going out to her garage tomorrow and getting the map out of a box and then calling me, concerning the map. What does she need to say in the email, and to whom should the email be sent? Again, thanks for all your help, I had a feeling the map was a Park Service
2880:
The ticket covers two images. The image you found on Flickr is also on the webpage (scroll down a bit), and the note at the bottom of the webpage (and the ticket) states that all the images on it are public domain. If I recall correctly, Flickr doesn't offer a public domain option, so I'm guessing
1442:
Hi, you deleted a file I had uploaded because of a permission issue. I have permission to upload the file but request guidance on how to proceed. I have had the following automated advice in Knowledge: "If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a
1067:
If this is unpublished, then it doesn't have anything to do with URAA at all. Unpublished anonymous photographs are protected for 120 years from creation in the United States, regardless of the source country and regardless of the copyright status of the source country on the URAA date. So if this
891:
If you can get the information together, I'm more than happy to restore the image for you. Sometimes its easy to take for granted what we think is an obvious notability, but with non-free files we have to be more careful. Our policies are more strict than US Fair Use law. I don't fully understand
303:
192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest
5345:
Hi IP24. Thank you for the compliment, but I don't know enough about what page you are working on that you would like help. Your best bet would be to find the WikiProject most closely associated with your page. There you could find some active users who have experience in articles in that field.
5007:
There is a similar situation with File:Sepik River initiations 1975.JPG, we need the written permission that you have for "free of copyright." The same is true forFile:Rakaposhi 4.jpg, File:Rakaposhi 3.jpg, File:Cape York Peninsula Map.jpg. We also need to know who the original author of File:Flo
3697:
I am 100% certain that I was correct in deleting the photo. The photo is copyrighted and marked as non-free. Non-free images can not be used if a free version can be made (does not have to exist, simply be made). If the original copyright holder (usually the photographer) has or will release the
3137:
I have put Nigel's name with the copyright at the bottom of the cuts that I took from the video. I previously had asked Sven about adding the copyright information at the bottom of each page on April 12th, and he said it was ok. I also asked Sven about uploading the cuts and what was need for the
756:
The Ultimate Warrior's active wrestling career was very brief, compared to most top names. Between 1988-1992, consumer-level photography wasn't as widespread as it became. He was back for a cup of coffee in 1996 and 1998, then one match in Spain in 2004. The combination of low opportunity and low
752:
So, if the images don't convey equivalent information, there's no NFCC #3 problem with this one. Myself and others have looked for free content, and the best we've found are the two where his face is obscured, by his arm or Savage's. In the WrestleMania VI fair use pic, he's missing the signature
3863:
This file is only in the public domain in the United States if it entered the public domain in Canada prior to 1996. This image can only be kept if it is also in the public domain in the US. If it is in the public domain in both Canada and the United States it may be transferred to the Wikimedia
3838:
The Knowledge page "Elmira District Secondary School" page was established in March 2007 byā Dconlon268 who does not now have a Knowledge account. I assume this would be the Dave Conlon who was in my EDSS Graduating Class and later went on to be an EDSS Vice Principal. As far as I can tell, he
1326:
Hi there TLSuda! I see you deleted the Fabrizio Sotti Photograph.jpg that was being used on the artist's page. Please note that I have resubmitted the image, alongside permission for the use of the photograph on Knowledge through a creative commons license. I sent the image and permissions to
1251:
I was trying to find images to 'rescue' for Commons, but in general images that are missing important data like permissions or sources , or which have iffy licensing should be tagged accordingly. Also if you find stuff tagged PD-US it would be appreciated if it could be determined if PD-US-1923
1011:
US copyright was restored to any image that was not in the public domain by 1996. This seems odd I know, but it was the US (and other countries) way of fixing copyright issues across political boundaries. Due to the URAA, the US gives it a copyright for 95 years after the date it was published.
3872:
The photograph shows the school in its pristine new condition, prior to subsequent renovations or encroachments of the town, which backs up Dconlon268's upload which dates it as from 1939. This picture was hanging at the school in the 1970's when I attended it, and may still be there.) It was
4978:
In 2010 I wrote to you requesting permission to upload your outstanding photo of a Saw-shelled Turtle to the Knowledge. It is still accessible on the Knowledge at File:Saw-shelled Turtle.jpg. To see it - and to check all the copyright details - including a copy of your original message giving
4937:
Thank you for the above note where you explain your position. I do really respect the lengths the Knowledge community goes to make sure proper copyright protection is given for images uploaded to it. I have always tried very hard to abide by these rules - but it seems now that maybe I did not
1504:
Hi TLSuda, thanks for this. I do not appear to have received the response of 9 May. I asked the copyright holder to submit a letter as per a template I obtained from Knowledge. The text reads as follows: "I hereby affirm that I, Scott Turner, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive
5063:
Thank you for your thoughtful and kind note. I do appreciate it and I do understand why making absolutely certain of copyright is so important for the Knowledge. I will send the link you have given on to any of the photographers in question that i can find now, and ask them to send copies of
3919:
There are a couple of things at play here. First, the only information about the image that was on the description page is: "Picture of EDSS Elmira District Secondary School original building." That means there is no date given for when exactly the image was taken. Without a date, we cannot
809:
works is that you have to do more than say why you feel an non-free image is required. The article has to have sourced text that would cause the average reader to need to see a non-free image to understand the text. We have exceptions for identification purposes, but not when free content is
395:
I felt the arguments spoke for themselves. There was a consensus to delete. You quoted most of the important parts of the previous FFD. When other editors brought up the concept that if the soundtrack were notable enough, it should have its own article, you never responded. You even quoted
1798:
including point number one. If this same image was recreated with a deck of standard playing cards (with no fancy design) or in the form of a user-created graphic, the image would be free. This image is easily replaceable, so we would not accept any non-free file for any reason. Cheers,
4560:
I'm not exactly sure what that page is for, so I don't know how to help, or who to point you to. Could you explain it to me a bit better? What's the purpose of the page? What are the goals? How can you quantify those goals? I'm happy to help, but I need some more information. Cheers,
1577:
Patience is a virtue my friend. It can take a week when the queue is slow, and months when it is backlogged, for permissions to be accepted. I've been busy for a couple of days in real life, so I haven't been able to take care of this immediately. It has been taken care of. Cheers,
1034:
thank you very much for kind and patient explanation. Sorry to be thick, but what does publish mean, in that how many people have to see something for it to have been considered published? Or does publish mean 'reproduced' in a book? Or does publish just mean manufacture completion
1553:
I am receiving no response to my email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org - is it possible to have a response here? Should I proceed with re-loading the picture and state that permission email has been submitted? I am worried that it would be deleted again. Thanks in anticipation.
3160:
If you need more information, please let me know. Thank you again, as you were the person who handled the photo of Justine that I spent two months getting the permission and release. Thank you for updating all the required information for Nigel's cuts, greatly appreciated!Ā !Ā !
3066:
My next question is for some other images that you've uploaded. Are the following also part of the film? If so the description pages need to be updated to reflect that Nigel Nobel is the author and that the source is the film. If not, where did these come from? The files are:
1839:
I can understand your disappointment, but the Wikimedia Foundation's mission is to provide free content. We don't ever want to violate copyright laws, and we want to make our content easily reusable (as much as possible). Let me know, and we can work on this together. Cheers,
531:
that the images on the document were created by the Navy, or else they would list the appropriate copyright information. As such, it is actually in the public domain as the works of an employee of the US Navy under their job duties. The appropriate tag for the image would be
434:
the image itself and since it is significantly different from the film poster, its deletion is detrimental to readers understanding of the topic. If after putting my Keep opinion, had I split off the article, would the discussion have been closed as no longer being applicable?
304:
scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nominationāwhether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere elseāwill not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
2108:
Hi - I dont know which photo you are discussing - there are three? Two taken by one Hugo Burnand and the Bar cabinet by Ray Main. Both photographers have given permission - - I am sending the portrait photo permission in on 19.5.14 but he bar cabinet has been given already?
4411:
Same image. Different author listed, but I think that the author that was listed and the uploader are one in the same. I don't think we need to do anything about it, but if you want a copy, I'd be happy to email you the information to make a decision for yourself. Cheers,
5304:
Thank you. I am very interested in a Meetup/Training which will give people a hands-on experience with Knowledge and have people there to give help. It is a matter of location and the number of people involved. I will see what happens by the beginning of next week.
448:
Also in the future, it would be helpful, if a discussion has arguments on both sides, to actually list the reason why something was deleted/kept/merged, instead of simply saying the verdict, so that the editors know why it was closed without having to come ask you.
4999:
Thanks for uploading File:Saw-shelled Turtle.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 02:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
1658:. I am inclined to upload it again, since it's a photo I took. I assume the reason you deleted it was that it had the wrong fair use tags and such. That being said, would you be willing to help me find the right tags to put on the image if I upload it again?
4634:
Good point. Seems like the proposed scope of this page may be better as a section of an already-existing guideline. (After your first response, I was thinking this myself, but your second statement confirmed my thoughts.) Anyways, thanks for your input! Cheers,
1477:
I saw the email and duly responded on 9 May 2014. The permission was not enough as the original copyright holder only said that it could be used on Knowledge. They need to release the file under a specific non-free license, an example of permissions is found at
2489:
I would just leave it tagged, maybe someone else can clean it up. I was able to get most of the border without losing too much of the image. A more experienced image editor might could "brush" it out or use some other technique of cleaning it up. Cheers,
2999:
here, even us admins, and we have full lives that we lead away from here. There is nothing that cannot be undone, so pending deletion, or actual deletion is nothing to get frantic about. We can always restore an image as soon as the situation is resolved.
4952:
This morning I have also written to Mr. Latta - the photographer of the photo of the Saw-shelled Turtle in the Knowledge, and asked him to please try to write to you directly. I just hope he is still at his old address. Here is what I wrote to him today:
2466:
is tagged, either incorrectly or because of the single column of black pixels on the edge (I think). I can't trim this losslessly without removing a lot more than this column. Should I detag it as untrimmable, leave it or trim it in a lossy method?
594:
You know, I just saw that when poking around. In my opinion, if the image were non-free, there isn't enough contextual significance. But the image is free, so you are good to use it. That major re-haul of the article is looking very good! Cheers,
4989:
I will paste in the note I have just been sent by one of the Knowledge's editors and ask that, if you would still like to see it on Knowledge, please write yourself to the editor giving permission again. I am so sorry to trouble you with all this.
2616:
I could open the attachment, but it is only a screenshot of someone's email (no content about releasing anything). If y'all need me to take care of something, let me know. If not, I'll just let y'all handle it as you're taking care of it. Cheers,
1007:
public domain in the UK 70 years later in 1999. If it was ever published, it would be 70 years from the date of publication. I don't see a publication of this photo, so the UK year for public domain is 1999. Due to some fancy legalese in the
549:
policy (which is purposely stricter). The image looks to be from a map, with a digital rendition created on top of the image. It could be replaced by an aerial photo of the island and runway with a user-generated rendition, therefore failing
401:
which was determined by the quality of the arguments in relation to policy, was to delete. If you would like me to jumble this all into a formal closing statement, I am more than happy to, but I really did not feel it was necessary. Cheers,
5205:
for more information. We are expanding the LGBT Atlanta, Georgia pages. This would be a tremendous help to Knowledge and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions!
3867:
Note: If this image is in the public domain in the US, modify the end of the copyright tag from ā}}ā to ā|commons}}ā. This will replace the preceding US copyright notification with a nomination for this image to be moved to the Wikimedia
429:. I also felt it was ridiculous that an argument was made that because the soundtrack did not yet have its own article was used as an excuse to claim it was not notable because it could be created now or in the future. The image passed
4022:
Hi TLSuda, thank you for reviewing my article. I want to re post it and I've changed the about section so now it's written by me. I shouldn't have been so lazy and just copied from the website. Hopefully it goes through this time.
1074:
If first published between 1944 and 1999, then the photographer (or his heir) holds the copyright in the United Kingdom for 70 years from publication, and if first published in this period, then the 70-year period hasn't expired
3183:
All of the images that I linked I have already cleaned up. Anytime you upload images that are from the film, you should include all of the information like I've done in the descriptions for the images. What is the full name of
632:
That's exciting. If you have trouble finding a Good Article reviewer in a reasonable amount of time, let me know, and I can take a look. I went through the recruitment program, and I enjoy doing it from time to time. Cheers,
4948:
I see that you have just written me another note about all the Qashgai photographs and I will therefore try to contact the photographer through a mutual old friend and colleague who I believe now lives, I believe, in Toronto.
2688:, and marked the original {{obsolete}}. I think I also need to mark it for deletion, but I'm not sure what the correct method is. Is there a template I should use, perhaps {{subst:orfud}}, or is it an FFD request? Thanks!--
2433:
4795:
I had saw something about it previously, but since the issue hasn't been completely resolved, I felt that impending deletion would be the quickest way to have this taken care of. Let me know what I can do to help. Cheers,
990:
thanks for tagging the photo. Sorry to ask, but I'm still I'm not sure why it is considered 'not free', in that as public shot in 1929, anonymously, is that not ok for full use. 85 years surely takes it out of copyright?
5004:
a letter of permission from the original copyright holder (photographer) stating they release their image under (whatever license they choose) for us to be able to use it. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
3745:
policy. It is the cover of a book and therefore cannot be replaced by a free replacement (because you cannot just create a new cover for the book). For non-free images to be used, they have to meet all of the points of
3876:
Until now. This year the school is having it's 75th Anniversary, which is a time when many people would be likely to look at the Knowledge page. You can see the image is included on the EDSS Anniversary site here:
4986:
photographer - sometimes, as in your case, more than once. This is becoming a major nuisance to me - especially as I am now handicapped and spend almost all my time in bed in pain and on heavy doses of medication.
673:
1603:
Thank you TLSuda - pls forgive my impatience! I've had no email response received at my address. You say "It has been taken care of." Does this mean I may go ahead and upload the image? All the best and thanks.
847:
key. I may have mistaken some info as obvious. This guy was one of my Top 5 TV Father Figures, but that's definitely not true for general audiences. I'll get the article up to snuff before revisiting the image
5329:
Since you are so intelligent, efficient and a great person, I was wondering if you could recommend an Administrator/Editor in Knowledge that is equal to your capabilities; to assist me with a page. Thank you
4525:
I'm reaching out to you to see if you may either be able to assist with this page, or know of any other editors who may have interest in building this page. I created this page due to seeing that an entry on
1078:
If first published in 2000 or later, then the copyright belongs to whoever was the first person to publish it. The 25-year period will not yet have expired, so it will still be in force. See Article 4 of the
3740:
Although that image has permission from the source to "use on Knowledge," it is not sufficient enough to have the image. The image is non-free (just like the one you uploaded) and is being used within our
857:
As for general weight, the article is clearly focused more on his time as the formerly pictured Warrior, so still think there's a recentism issue. Even considering his private/speaking/blogging life, it's
912:
The community feel and relative ease of enforcement provides more freedom for restriction. Same basic deal how and why we catch and punish our own kids more than other kids. They all need to come through
4938:
understand them well enough. I am sorry - but this is all getting me really a bit down - especially as i went to a lot of trouble in each case to make certain I had the permission of each photographer.
3982:
because there is no contextual significance in the article that would require the image to be seen to understand the article. You need to remember that all non-free files must meet all criteria of the
793:. Although there is not an exact duplicate free image, you have multiple images, that, when seen together, any reader can understand what he looked like throughout his career. The secondary issue, is
5199:
Hi TLSuda. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Knowledge, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Atlanta's
3573:
1819:
I have to admit I'm disappointed with that answer. But hey, I didn't write the rules. I will edit the photo, show you a copy and if it checks out I'll repost. At least we can still discuss it.
1148:
1229:
Nifty tool, I've never seen it before. Is the query that you set up seem to be files that are potentially lacking permission/missing source/etc? Or is there something that I am missing? Cheers,
2398:
Does most of that really matter? The dealer described it as an "press photo," and they specialize in selling only originals (from the negative.) There's no notice on any of them. And as noted in
970:
2976:
the three images are contained in the links that were provided at the beginning of the post. I left a response to Ankry's post, which has not been answered. Greatly appreciate your assistance.
3371:
If she can send the email to OTRS with the information about ht being a Park Service map, that would be great. Let me know if/when she does and I will get the image restored for you. Cheers,
778:
and a HoFer, as well as a motivational speaker. These are all important aspects of the person, so saying that the article is about the wrestler negates the other information included. Second,
372:
was deleted since there was disagreement on whether it should be kept, plus it had been kept in a previous FfD last year with the exact same positions. In this case it looks like you took the
4534:, a talk page. Given the fact that certain talk page are subject to being archived, and the fact that a policy page should really not refer a reader to a talk page for a guideline, I created
2566:. I have located the ticket which seems to have been accidentally filed into our junk mail queue. I was however unable to view the release - please check your inbox for more details. Thanks.
223:
162:
4945:
It is very difficult for me now to chase all these matters up - especially as I no longer have current email addresses for all the photographers and also that I am sick and bedridden.
4775:
for which we're not sure where they came out of. They're currently listed in my Sandbox to see if we can salvage any of them. User has said he was the copyright holder of a few of them
3595:) because he pointed out that he was often getting messages for images that he simply reduced. Maybe you could explain better, or else we need to work something different out. Cheers,
1088:
Unfortunately, we don't know when the image was first published, and we don't know whether the photographer is known or unknown in the legal meaning. We know that it has been published
377:
373:
117:
866:
symbol, if not the others. All over his various official websites, and about as iconic as any in branding. Its lack (at least in a non-plastic form, which doesn't make him look like
5149:
The file is deleted. Because we cannot verify any copyright on the file, we have to treat it as non-free. As a non-free file, it is replaceable by a free version therefore failing
3565:
1887:
It is not the best quality, and I still feel like simply retaking the photos with a standard deck would be more appropriate, but I guess its okay. Are those names of real casinos?
507:
article when discussing the museum's opposition to a proposal to install photovoltaic panels on the historic runway on the island because it would damage the visual history?--v/r -
293:
263:
2818:
Nevermind, the image is released into the public domain (at that resolution) but I found the larger image released under a CC-by-2.0 so I've updated the image accordingly. Cheers,
2173:
Hello - I now have been told that both photographers have sent through the approval to Permissions- can you check please and reinstate all the pictures please.Thanks in advance.
242:
181:
1378:
I've found the ticket and the old conversations. The volunteer who helped you previously has sadly passed away. I will look into this matter myself and help find a resolution.
4057:
What is your opinion about this? You deleted the file, and now it has been reposted. However, the deletion request does not look very clear. I would say that the file violates
3798:
You did put a notice and explain it on the talkpage, but frankly you never showed how the image would not be replaceable, rather you only stated that you had not found one.
1166:
It is not mandatory, but personally, I like to make sure that if there is any discussion on the talk page (i.e., not just a wikiproject banner), I leave a marker at Commons (
3873:
certainly well into the public domain, whether or not it had been under Crown Copyright. I checked back later and was pleased to see that the picture had not been deleted.
2316:, and that We Hope even provided two examples of similar images without a copyright, the reason for its deletion could use an explanation. His bio now lacks a lead image. --
200:
143:
3006:
2023:
Hi , I thought I had sent it through and it was in my out tray. I have sent it now and would appreciate your help getting these three images online pleaseĀ ! Many thanks
1214:
Any chance in doing your image patrolling you could take a very large axe to items on the above list to ensure every last troublesome woodworm is finally exterminated?
5388:, aside from that I don't know anyone who would work well in that article. I'm not a writer, and I don't work well with content. Maybe try asking at the talk page for
4714:
Based on the edit summary, you may have deleted one file revision too much. Could you check? Note that some revisions of the file are free and that some are unfree. --
1071:
If the photographer is unknown, and unless the image was published before 1944, the image is currently unfree in the United Kingdom, for one of the following reasons:
3568:, please also remove the row from the table in the "File history" section. Otherwise, the file remains in the database report of files which need to be tagged with {{
3640:
3633:
278:
3018:
5201:
3092:
3061:. Are there others somewhere on Commons/Wikipedia? Or others that have been deleted? If not, I've updated those that I've linked with the appropriate information.
4051:
3702:
process and the image would be reinstated. Permission to "used the image on Knowledge" is not sufficient, it has to be released under a free license. Cheers,
798:
5228:
I was not aware of this and it seems very interesting, but I'm a bit confused. Is this an actual meet up, or simply a project for the whole month? Cheers,
5153:
as a map could be created. If you think that a map like this is helpful to the article, one can be created. You could reach out to the wonderful folks at
3508:
The image of "The Ribbon Route" has been restored. Thank you again for all of your work on these images, very impressive and positive. Greatly appreciated.
696:
tag) while deleting several other similar files. Are the other files also covered by the OTRS ticket? Also, is something still pending for the kept file? --
4393:
3430:
Marie Dennis sent the email you requested this evening 5/24. It is noted in the subject line: Attention TL Suda Ā RE: File:The Ribbon Route.jpg. Thank you
3096:
2950:
1923:
1505:
copyright of the attached portrait image of Professor Kameshwar C. Wali, 27 April 2014, generated on a Nikon D3200, last modified at 13:18, 27 April 2014.
4886:
4113:
4101:
3014:
1346:
1012:
Therefore the US copyright expires in 2024 (ten years from now) and it would then be in the public domain in the US as well. I hope that helps. Cheers,
2609:
1930:
1154:
Please make sure that the Commons image shows proper attribution (i.e., it's not a copyvio for failure to follow attribution requirements). Example:
4996:
John Hill Cooktown, Queensland ........................................................... File permission problem with File:Saw-shelled Turtle.jpg
4671:, which has been languishing in the long queue? Actually, I'm competing in the Wikicup this year, and I need the points! Thanks, and best to you.
3042:
3034:
2225:
843:
Hadn't considered the article text as well I should have, in a #8 light. You're right that it doesn't make clear why each of the seven key elements
109:
3591:
I'm not sure what you are asking. I revdel'd the image so the original uploader is still attached to it. We did this per Sven Manguard's request (
4396:. There is now a file on Commons with the same name. Is it the same file, and does it have the same copyright problem as the one on Knowledge? --
2842:
1127:
If there are any old versions in the history of the image, they should be moved to Commons as well. I created a bot specifically for this task:
4586:
4178:
due to lack of permission. If I have documentation that proves permession to use the image, how to I show that so it doesn't get deleted again?
2795:
2776:
1771:
297:
4232:
that they could use. If you want to let me know when the permission is sent, I will search for it for you as I am an OTRS volunteer. Cheers,
3395:
Thank you for the prompt reply. Thank you so much for everything, greatly appreciated by numerous people. Will let you know about the email.
2838:
2772:
2765:
3901:
3546:
1197:
504:
204:
5014:
If you do decide you want to contact this editor about the photo - you should be able to do so through his main page on the wikipedia at:
764:
Feedback would be appreciated. The lack earlier led me to assume the issue was resolved, and made the deletion that much more surprising.
5389:
5371:
5331:
3644:
3068:
2658:
blank. Oops! Sorry about that. I've asked the photographer to resend and I'll forward it as soon as I get it. Thanks again. Julie
2039:
4610:
I'm still very confused as to why this is needed. Anytime we have a "high-risk image" (using your terminology), it should be taken to
1539:
I have emailed the above document as an attachment to permissions-en@wikimedia.org Please advise how I should proceed from here. Thanks
5274:
and a half north of downtown, but I would be more than happy to help out with anything that I can. Let me know what I can do. Cheers,
5154:
4729:
I deleted the unfree ones (instead of just revdel) and I restored the other one. There isn't much difference, just 12 pixels. Cheers,
4172:
3842:
when he started the page. In 2011 there was a move to delete the picture over copyright. This is what the notice on the page said:
3080:
3030:
1409:
147:
749:, and the weight should be placed where it's due. The article is about a professional wrestler, not a retired Hall of Fame inductee.
4386:
4270:
Aha. I see. If you get a satisfactory license, I'm happy to restore this, or any OTRS permission image for you. Just let me know.
4225:
4197:
3534:
3076:
3050:
1877:
1829:
1784:
1740:
1693:
1668:
315:
3850:
1. it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published more than 50 years ago, or it was not subject to Crown copyright, and
3722:
Alright, I got the idea of asking the copyright holder for permission to use his work on Knowledge after seeing this photograph,
4253:
3542:
3072:
3010:
2703:
Hey Otus scops. You're welcome to come by anytime you have a question. Since its a non-free file that is currently being used,
536:
308:. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on
4970:
Subject: Attention: Mr. Craig Latta. Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:11:20 +1000 From: John Hill <wynhill2@bigpond.net.au: -->
120:) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from
3022:
1342:
1750:
The logos need to be completely gone, and as long as you take the picture, you can release it under a free license. Cheers,
1327:
permissions-en@wikimedia.org just a few moments ago. Please advise on the next step to get this image back up on his page.
1068:
was first published after 2002, and if the photographer is unknown, then the copyright expires in the United States in 2050.
935:
down only works if you've got somewhere to put your foot down. Knowledge certainly does, and has a very clean house for it.
4614:
and then protected forever. That's the whole process as I know it, and I cannot think of any reason to change it. Cheers,
421:
I felt it was ridiculous that people were claiming that the soundtrack was not notable when it has sources and passes both
5385:
4039:
2707:
1860:
1175:
3846:
This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired for one of the following reasons:
1680:
579:
3026:
1080:
879:
Anyway, I'll try again when things are clearer. Could be a while. If I don't see you then, thanks again for the advice.
527:
That document is created by the Secretary of the Navy and their Assistant Secretary for the US Senate. I believe we can
2462:
Hi. Could I ask for some advice, please? I'm trimming some of the jpg images tagged for border removal with jpegtran.
4464:
3660:
2553:
2313:
328:
94:
2463:
859:
4306:
suggesting you would have your review up shortly, and I was wondering if you had had a chance to look at this yet?ā
3978:. The only place where it might be appropriate is in the "Building the new high school" section. Here it would fail
3723:
3254:
Who made the map image originally? Where did it come from? Has it ever been posted elsewhere on line? If so, where?
5092:
4676:
3088:
3046:
2335:
1252:
abroad was actually meant(I've found a few in reviewing the category that should have been tagged with the latter.)
352:
340:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
38:
3974:
for identification. There it could be replaced by a new free image of the current building, making the file fail
3475:
369:
362:
305:
4535:
4515:
3885:
you please explain what prompted the removal of the image? Thanks, Laurel L. Russwurm 18:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
757:
technology hinders finding perfectly free content. 2004 being what it was, there are Spanish fan pictures. Only
5367:
3897:
3058:
2685:
1338:
1191:
1132:
368:
Is there any particular reason you did not close the discussion because I would like to know the reasoning why
2845:; can you confirm that the image you've overwritten with is the same as that one, and I'll add the templates.
2681:
917:
door, reeking of whatever banned substance, and we have a vested interest in making our home look respectable.
5375:
5335:
4070:
1730:
So you're saying that all I need to do is remove the casino logos and that will make it a free image, right?
1169:
4472:, typing in an automatic edit summary and clicking on "Save page". Anyone can do this. I have fixed this. --
4361:
3643:
is in fact an agency of the State of Florida, and not a non-government organization. Please review it here:
3592:
3513:
3435:
3400:
3361:
3298:
3245:
3166:
3038:
2981:
2178:
2114:
2035:
2006:
680:
135:
4816:
How does en: wiki decide when to keep something with a Fair Use rationale? Would any of his uploads apply?
2881:
the uploader picked the next closest thing. I think we're safe to upload any/all of these images under PD.
2439:
1461:
I am wondering whether I can expect a reply from anyone on this matter - is there anyone out there? Regards
1160:
4749:
Yeah, the only difference between the two versions is the black border at the top that I forget to crop.--
4708:
3054:
2276:
1705:
939:
883:
768:
309:
219:
5182:
5139:
5088:
4672:
4454:
4303:
4261:
4219:
4205:
3731:
3680:
2886:
2850:
2784:
2234:
2174:
2163:
2110:
2080:
2063:
2031:
1873:
1825:
1780:
1736:
1689:
1664:
690:
617:
314:
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from
150:
contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's
3240:
Thank you again for your prompt attention and actions. Would like to get the map restored on the page.
1275:
This file can be deleted as it is no loner required. An alternative image is available in Wiki Commons.
4772:
4754:
4076:
I believe you are correct. You could re-nominate for deletion and include that information. Cheers,
4027:
3889:
2752:
2693:
2515:
2472:
2407:
2368:
2321:
2266:
2027:
1647:
1334:
1257:
1219:
177:
2331:
1) The article can have a lead image as fast as you can link one of the other images of the subject.
5069:
4686:
Yep, review done. Let me know if you have questions. Should be a quick and easy clean-up. Cheers,
4646:
4601:
4550:
4531:
4490:
Thanks Stefan for handling this, and for showing how to do it for the future. Cheers to you both,
4185:
3914:
3893:
3221:
3005:
in use and ones that may have been deleted. From what I can tell, there are images from the film:
2587:
2571:
2248:
1627:
1609:
1559:
1544:
1521:
1466:
1448:
1187:
1123:
Thanks for your helping in clearing the queue. A few notes before deleting an image as NowCommons:
987:
892:
why, but we do have to enforce them. Let me know when/if you get the information together. Cheers,
746:
324:
158:
5310:
5257:
5211:
4864:
4821:
4785:
3924:
3782:
3509:
3458:
3431:
3396:
3357:
3294:
3241:
3162:
2993:
2977:
2895:
You're right, I didn't see the second image lower on the page. Seems good enough for me. Cheers,
2663:
2595:
2541:
2256:
2002:
348:
336:
578:
Okay, that sounds like a better perspective than mine. The text I had intended to use is here:
2432:
When a file is deleted per F8, note that the associated talk page doesn't satisfy G8. Example:
1988:
1128:
207:) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include
5038:
4894:
4719:
4581:
The goals of this page are to define to its reader what a "High-risk image" is as outlined in
4477:
4401:
4376:
4229:
4127:
4066:
4035:
3809:
3699:
3620:
3581:
3569:
2961:
2939:
2932:
2447:
1479:
1280:
1272:
Editing File:Record lable for Kaye Ballard's recording of "in Other Words" by Bart Howard.jpg
1097:
1040:
996:
936:
880:
782:
is not a valid argument to keep non-free content. All non-free content must adhere to policy
765:
758:
701:
454:
439:
385:
113:
3698:
photo under a free license (including for commercial use) they can send an email through the
2654:- I'm embarrassed to admit it, but I forwarded the email without opening the attachment. It
2051:
Hi TLSuda, would you please take a look at Ticket#2014051410004443? I left a note. Regards.
5403:
5357:
5285:
5239:
5178:
5168:
5135:
5113:
5052:
4919:
4850:
4807:
4740:
4697:
4625:
4572:
4501:
4443:
4423:
4328:
4281:
4257:
4243:
4215:
4201:
4200:. The problem with the image was the lack of an explicit license from the copyright holder.
4155:
4087:
4001:
3946:
3823:
3761:
3727:
3713:
3692:
3676:
3606:
3489:
3382:
3337:
3265:
3199:
3115:
2906:
2882:
2871:
2846:
2829:
2809:
2780:
2738:
2628:
2501:
2389:
2353:
2297:
2230:
2209:
2152:
2142:
2126:
2096:
2072:
2052:
1969:
1898:
1868:
1851:
1820:
1810:
1775:
1761:
1731:
1719:
1684:
1659:
1650:, which I uploaded. I would like to discuss this file with you. It was a photo if various
1589:
1493:
1423:
1389:
1369:
1311:
1240:
1058:
1023:
963:
903:
821:
723:
644:
624:
606:
586:
569:
511:
478:
412:
289:
259:
191:
122:
47:
17:
4144:
It sure would be nice if the template description page had documentation for that. Cheers,
4750:
4668:
4122:. The file name on Commons is optional if it is the same as the file name on Knowledge. --
3840:
3675:
even when the copyright holders expressly wish for their material to be used on Knowledge?
3656:
3593:
User_talk:Sven_Manguard#Template:Orphaned_non-free_revisions_and_Template:Non-free_reduced
3538:
3527:
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by
2748:
2689:
2511:
2484:
2468:
2403:
2364:
2317:
1938:
1253:
1215:
779:
500:
422:
238:
3882:
2334:
2) Just because similar images are not copyrighted, doesn't mean that this one is. (see
1358:
As soon as permission is received and processed, the image will be reinstated. Cheers,
5150:
5065:
5032:
4905:
4831:
4636:
4591:
4540:
4181:
4058:
3983:
3979:
3975:
3932:
3799:
3747:
2717:
2641:
2605:
2583:
2567:
2283:
1795:
1623:
1605:
1555:
1540:
1517:
1462:
1444:
806:
794:
790:
783:
555:
551:
546:
464:
430:
320:
166:
5252:
Hoping for a Meetup and training for the community later this month - still planning.
4667:
Hi Suda, hope all is well with you. Would you mind assisting me with one of my GACs,
1092:
since it is available on Knowledge, but the first publication remains unidentified. --
5306:
5268:
5253:
5223:
5207:
4860:
4835:
4817:
4781:
4611:
4582:
4527:
3793:
3742:
3561:
2724:
2659:
2613:
2591:
2561:
2537:
1622:
Thank you TLSuda, I see the image is approved and 'back' in the system. Many Thanks!
1183:
974:
528:
426:
344:
332:
247:
153:
5102:
Looks good. Final thoughts added (all about files, which are my specialty). Cheers,
4371:
Will be provided on request." Otherwise, it sounds as if more evidence is needed. --
741:
You recently deleted the infobox image from his article. I think you were mistaken.
4890:
4715:
4473:
4397:
4372:
4139:
4123:
4062:
4031:
3987:
3970:
3616:
3577:
2957:
2443:
1651:
1276:
1093:
1036:
992:
697:
450:
435:
381:
378:
Knowledge:Files for deletion/Administrator instructions#Standard closure guidelines
254:
196:
139:
4980:
374:
Knowledge:Files for deletion/Administrator instructions#Express closure guidelines
2590:) - got your email. Responding now. Thanks so much for taking the time. Julie
5407:
5395:
5379:
5361:
5349:
5339:
5314:
5289:
5277:
5261:
5243:
5231:
5215:
5186:
5172:
5160:
5143:
5117:
5105:
5096:
5073:
5056:
5044:
4923:
4911:
4898:
4868:
4854:
4842:
4825:
4811:
4799:
4789:
4758:
4744:
4732:
4723:
4701:
4689:
4680:
4650:
4629:
4617:
4605:
4576:
4564:
4554:
4505:
4493:
4481:
4456:
4427:
4415:
4405:
4380:
4341:
4332:
4320:
4310:
4285:
4273:
4265:
4247:
4235:
4209:
4190:
4159:
4147:
4131:
4091:
4079:
4043:
4005:
3993:
3964:
3957:
3950:
3938:
3827:
3815:
3808:
release that photo (and maybe more) under a free license through the process at
3804:
3785:
3765:
3753:
3735:
3726:, which was also used with permission. Is this photo also being improperly used?
3717:
3705:
3684:
3664:
3624:
3610:
3598:
3585:
3550:
3517:
3493:
3481:
3439:
3404:
3386:
3374:
3365:
3341:
3329:
3302:
3269:
3257:
3249:
3203:
3191:
3170:
3119:
3107:
2985:
2965:
2946:
2910:
2898:
2890:
2875:
2863:
2854:
2833:
2821:
2813:
2801:
2788:
2756:
2742:
2730:
2697:
2667:
2647:
2632:
2620:
2599:
2575:
2545:
2519:
2505:
2493:
2476:
2451:
2411:
2393:
2381:
2372:
2357:
2345:
2325:
2301:
2289:
2241:
2213:
2201:
2182:
2165:
2146:
2134:
2118:
2100:
2088:
2065:
2045:
2010:
1973:
1961:
1942:
1902:
1890:
1882:
1855:
1843:
1834:
1814:
1802:
1789:
1765:
1753:
1745:
1723:
1711:
1698:
1673:
1631:
1613:
1593:
1581:
1563:
1548:
1525:
1497:
1485:
1470:
1452:
1427:
1415:
1393:
1381:
1373:
1361:
1350:
1315:
1303:
1284:
1261:
1244:
1232:
1223:
1201:
1101:
1062:
1050:
1027:
1015:
1000:
977:
942:
907:
895:
886:
825:
813:
771:
727:
715:
705:
648:
636:
627:
621:
610:
598:
589:
583:
573:
561:
522:
514:
508:
482:
470:
458:
443:
416:
404:
389:
356:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3222:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/User_talk:Susan_Macafee#File:The_Ribbon_Route.jpg
2438:
Please make sure that the file on Commons is in the same file format. Example:
1159:
Please make sure that the Commons image is not a copyright violation: Example:
266:). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to
5085:
3724:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Elusive_Quest_for_Growth_by_William_Easterly.jpg
3648:
2727:
request, but the speedy tag is more appropriate, and usually quicker. Cheers,
2399:
1934:
545:
If the image were non-free, it would meet US fair use, but would not meet our
127:
4394:
Knowledge:Possibly unfree files/2014 May 23#File:Objects made of chitosan.png
959:
Thanks for closing discussions from the MFD backlog, but in the future place
107:
Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's
4338:
4307:
3220:
The name of the file is: File:The Ribbon Route.jpg - it has been deleted.
274:
185:
5157:
who might be able to work with you to create a higher quality map. Cheers,
4337:
Thanks for the review which has definitely helped to improve the article.ā
4052:
File:Intercollegiate Studies Institute Student's Guide Multi-volume set.jpg
1174:) so that users know not to split the conversation unnecessarily. Example:
312:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck!
3969:
You have no evidence of when the photo was taken. Your information is all
1147:
Please make sure that the image has been transferred to Commons. Example:
300:. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.
4887:
Knowledge talk:Non-free content/Archive 63#Thoughts on a new NFC#UUI item
2434:
File talk:Deane Nesbitt Jr. in 2014 nesbittmusic.com website homepage.jpg
397:
172:
169:, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included
4442:
for me? All files have been restored via OTRS. Thanking you in advance.
1155:
3529:
284:
208:
5366:
Would it be helpful is provided the page? I am having major problems.
5131:
I am confused by your ruling on the issue. What exactly happens now?
5064:
permissions both via that link and to myself. Best wishes and thanks,
4780:
too quick off the bat moving them. Oh, and thanks for the barnstarĀ :)
3920:
determine whether or not the image is in the public domain. Also, the
2860:
to either split the two media, or chose one over the other. Thoughts?
1864:
1655:
867:
214:
4979:
permission, either click on this link or copy it into your browser:
2402:, publicity photos like these were traditionally not copyrighted. --
674:
File:20 ft container straight truck with 20 ft container trailer.jpg
165:) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including
133:) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's
5019:
2085:
What is the photographer's name who physically snapped the photo?
1138:
Please make sure to relink any files which are on Commons under a
269:
233:
227:
4961:
Email, no need to fully display, as it contains personal details.
4530:, as a guideline for high-risk images, referenced a guideline on
3860:
The media description page should identify which reason applies.
3853:
2. it is a photograph that was created before January 1, 1949, or
3576:) forever, making it very difficult to find more files to tag. --
988:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Dawley_Court,_Middlesex_in_1929.jpg
3878:
2312:
It seemed that since no typical rationale was given for tagging
1008:
5177:
Ah, that makes sense now. I shall contact them shortly. Thanks.
4061:, but this was not at all discussed in the deletion request. --
4514:
Do you know of anyone who may be able to assist with creating
3803:
the plane. At least one is still in airworthy condition (see [
665:
203:), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated
25:
4587:
Knowledge talk:Cascade-protected items#About high-risk images
4174:
File:Sean Haugh, 2014 NC Libertarian Candidate for Senate.jpg
3990:
and show it to me, I will happily restore the image. Cheers,
3574:
User:Svick/Non-free images with multiple files in the history
1149:
File:Mars Exploration and Research Rover (Prototype)-MERR.jpg
4256:
last week, but there was no (satisfactory) license release.
3104:
Let me know and I can try my best to work with you. Cheers,
2953:
at any timeĀ by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2931:
971:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Administrator instructions
870:) is a main concern, but a broader issue, for the talk page.
5015:
3645:
Knowledge:Media_copyright_questions#Please_review.E2.80.A6
1708:), that image could be released as a free file. Cheers,
5084:
Hey Suda, I have finished addressing your comments here
4110:
Note that you need to include the file name on Commons:
184:), who saw three articles (including the top-importance
4776:
4470:
4439:
3356:
map, after previously going through Park Service maps.
2839:
File:Dr._Widad_Akrawi_Addressing_the_United_Nations.png
2773:
File:Dr._Widad_Akrawi_Addressing_the_United_Nations.png
2766:
File:Dr. Widad Akrawi Addressing the United Nations.png
2676:
Replaced jpg with png - what to mark the original with?
1143:
2794:
Yes it is, but there is no evidence of permission for
2363:
original photo, not a duplication. Hope that helps. --
1863:
is a new version. I replaced the logos with names of
4904:
I've done something.... not really closed, but I was
4771:
Hi there, I'm sure you've heard about the uploads by
2723:) is the best & fastest way to go. You can do a
1770:
Can I repost the image ā with the logos ā if I put a
499:
Is it appropriate to use the image of Ford Island in
4981:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Saw-shelled_Turtle.jpg
2252:
and logos are simply too simple for copyright. (See
4469:Note that rollback only is a shorthand of going to
2001:A very helpful administrator, extremely efficient.
3007:File:The Ribbon crossing the Arlington Bridge.jpg
1794:No. The images have to meet all of the points of
745:near 30 years as a public figure. This smacks of
5011:...............................................
4830:On En.Wp all non-free media must conform to our
4317:everything in my review is suggestions. Cheers,
3986:policy. If you can get any evidence (that isn't
712:should be (I removed the pending tag). Cheers,
3641:South Florida Regional Transportation Authority
3634:South Florida Regional Transportation Authority
1438:Wish to recreate deleted image file - seek help
5202:Knowledge:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiki Loves Pride 2014
4889:and add the new UUI if you think appropriate?
3881:But when I looked at the Knowledge Page again
3093:File:Chancel area - South Transept Balcony.jpg
2228:? No one agreed with the nominators rational.
3805:http://www.hansajet.de/en/frames/main1043.htm
2612:for anyone looking (also for easy clicking).
834:Thanks, definitely more helpful than silence.
188:) through featured article candidacies, and
8:
799:File:The Ultimate Warrior RAW April 2014.jpg
3856:3. the creator died more than 49 years ago.
3639:TLSuda. I have provided evidence that the
3097:File:Washington D.C. National Cathedral.jpg
2798:so I've tagged it for deletion on Commons.
2510:Thank you - I'll leave that one as it is.--
1924:File:70000TONS OF METAL Pool Deck Stage.jpg
1646:A couple of weeks ago you deleted the file
126:, lithographs of various warships (such as
4956:
4050:
3015:File:Survivors addressing congregation.jpg
761:more representative of the general topic.
380:. Thank you in advance of your response,
5020:https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TLSuda
4171:
2938:Hello, TLSuda. You have new messages at
4930:Reply to the file permission "problems".
4196:You would need to send a release to the
3537:is very much appreciated. Many thanks.
3043:File:Justine addressing congregation.jpg
3035:File:Justine with Ribbon from Russia.jpg
3019:File:"The Ribbon" at the White House.jpg
2680:Sorry, another question. I've replaced
4959:
4302:Hi, On 26 May you kindly put a note on
2841:is released into the public domain per
5016:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/User:TLSuda
4885:Can you go ahead and review and close
2796:File:Dr Widad Akrawi UN BMS2010 DI.png
2777:File:Dr_Widad_Akrawi_UN_BMS2010_DI.png
2608:for looking into this. The ticket is
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2131:Check again, I've commented. Cheers,
969:over the section header according to
7:
5037:First, if you point these people to
4367:, then please also delete the text "
4228:) said. There is a good template at
2771:Hi there; could you tell me whether
505:Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor
205:list of plantations in West Virginia
5390:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
3069:File:Washing_National_Cathedral.jpg
580:User:TParis/Pacific_Aviation_Museum
5384:Maybe the two users who worked at
3081:File:California Banner on Mall.jpg
3031:File:Justine Merritt Interview.jpg
1410:File:Fabrizio Sotti Photograph.jpg
789:The main issue with this image is
554:. The file might have issues with
542:, and the PDF would be the source.
148:Silver certificate (United States)
24:
4387:File:Objects made of chitosan.png
4198:Knowledge:Volunteer Response Team
4114:Nominated for deletion on Commons
4102:Nominated for deletion on Commons
3188:image? I cannot find it. Cheers,
3099:, where did this image come from?
3077:File:Tying panels on the Mall.jpg
3051:File:Helicopter view Pentagon.jpg
2747:Thanks again - I've tagged it. --
1679:A copy of the image can be found
316:Knowledge:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send
4438:Can you please perform rollback
3560:When deleting old revisions per
3465:
3128:Thank you for your prompt reply.
2528:Deleted File:GregKurstin2013.jpg
2314:File:Carroll O'Connor - 1974.jpg
2189:
2019:File:Portrait of Tim Gosling.jpg
1987:
1949:
1933:. Could you verify and restore?
1399:
1291:
283:
268:
253:
232:
213:
190:
171:
152:
134:
108:
29:
3073:File:The Ribbon Starts Here.jpg
3011:File:Ribbon Reflecting Pool.jpg
1047:by the general public. Cheers,
3935:). I hope that helps. Cheers,
3023:File:Ribbon at the Capitol.jpg
1:
5386:Talk:The Ribbon International
3879:http://edss75.com/beginnings/
3089:File:Wash Cath Surviors 1.jpg
1176:File talk:Donetskrepublic.svg
103:WikiCup 2014 April newsletter
5089:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
4673:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
4353:Will be provided on request.
3834:What Prompted This Deletion?
3027:File:Mary Frances Jastor.jpg
2428:Some notes on F8 deletions:
2224:Now where was the consensus
2220:Another unexplained deletion
1116:Notes on NowCommons deletion
1081:Copyright Duration Directive
5155:WP:Graphic Lab/Map workshop
2151:Checked & repliedĀ ;) --
686:(although also keeping the
370:File:Tangled Soundtrack.jpg
363:File:Tangled Soundtrack.jpg
5428:
5124:2nd Battle of the Odon map
4971:To: aftforum@bigpond.com
4968:Original Message --------
4585:. I copied this text from
4536:Knowledge:High-risk images
4516:Knowledge:High-risk images
3543:MediaWiki message delivery
3047:File:Howard University.jpg
2464:Bamil_Biggest_Greatest.jpg
2077:Looked. I agree with you.
5408:20:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
5380:19:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
5362:12:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
5340:20:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
5315:02:17, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
5290:22:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5262:22:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5244:22:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5216:06:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5187:23:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5173:22:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5144:09:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5118:22:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5097:05:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
5074:23:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
5057:14:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
4924:23:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
3476:File:The Ribbon Route.jpg
3147:A file has been deleted,
1986:
1182:A few other rules are at
1129:toollabs:magog/oldver.php
306:Knowledge:WikiCup/Reviews
5368:The Ribbon International
4899:15:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
4869:10:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
4855:15:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
4826:13:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
4812:12:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4790:12:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4759:21:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
4745:21:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
4724:21:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
4702:23:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4681:20:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4651:19:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4630:19:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4606:17:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4577:17:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4555:16:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4506:14:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4482:14:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4457:14:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4428:14:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4406:13:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
4392:You deleted the file in
4381:14:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4342:06:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4333:21:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
4311:08:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
4286:01:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4266:01:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4248:01:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4210:13:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4191:12:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4160:01:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
4132:13:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4092:17:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4071:13:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4044:17:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
4006:22:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
3965:15:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
3951:20:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
3828:22:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
3786:03:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
3766:18:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
3736:17:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
3718:17:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
3685:17:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
3665:18:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
3625:11:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
3611:21:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
3586:13:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
3551:06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
3518:19:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
3494:04:00, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
3440:02:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
3405:02:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
3387:02:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
3366:02:12, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
3342:01:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
3303:01:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
3270:23:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
3250:23:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
3204:21:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
3171:03:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
3120:02:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
3059:File:A Bomb Memorial.jpg
2986:01:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2966:12:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
2947:12:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
2911:13:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2891:13:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2876:13:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2855:12:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2834:11:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2814:11:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2789:11:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
2757:20:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2743:18:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2698:18:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2682:File:CST_Brands,_Inc.jpg
2668:15:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2633:21:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2600:19:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2576:04:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2546:04:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2520:13:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2506:12:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2477:11:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2452:23:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2412:02:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2394:02:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2373:02:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2358:01:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2326:01:31, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2302:01:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2242:01:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2214:21:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
2183:11:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
2166:17:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
2147:16:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
2119:07:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
2101:16:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2066:13:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2046:09:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2011:19:06, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
1974:16:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
1943:15:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
1903:16:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
1883:01:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1856:13:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1835:12:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1815:03:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1790:22:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
1632:16:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1614:16:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1594:14:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1564:12:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1549:21:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1526:21:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1498:16:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1471:14:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1453:06:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1428:16:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1394:16:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1374:16:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1351:15:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1316:16:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1285:03:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1262:09:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1245:01:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1224:00:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1202:16:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1133:File:Donetskrepublic.svg
1102:15:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1063:12:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1028:03:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1001:23:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
978:22:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
943:01:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
908:00:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
296:) for their work on the
5018:or his "Talk page" at:
4777:section on South Africa
3087:I'm also curious about
3039:File:Joan Urbanczyk.jpg
2610:ticket:2014051310000207
1931:ticket:2014051510021093
1766:10:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
1746:05:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
1724:15:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
1699:03:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
1674:03:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
887:22:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
826:21:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
772:19:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
728:21:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
706:14:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
649:10:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
628:21:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
611:21:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
590:21:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
574:21:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
515:19:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
495:Question about Fair Use
483:03:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
463:Here's the thing about
459:02:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
444:02:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
417:02:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
390:02:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
357:17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
146:), whose featured list
5087:. Hope they're okay.
4709:File:Jena Engstrom.png
3870:
3055:File:Betty Bumpers.jpg
2936:
537:PD-USGov-Military-Navy
310:Knowledge talk:WikiCup
5195:Wiki Loves Pride 2014
4942:hold some weight?
4767:Uploads by Aldercraft
4304:Talk:Sutton Court/GA1
4298:Talk:Sutton Court/GA1
3844:
3670:Photo of Ikuhiko Hata
2935:
2843:otrs:2014052310015307
2458:Border removal advice
2440:File:BPolice flag.jpg
2424:Notes on F8 deletions
1186:(naturally). Thanks.
1161:File:BPolice flag.jpg
42:of past discussions.
4118:file name on Commons
4018:Deletion of Sex Tips
2708:Di-orphaned fair use
2308:Unexplained deletion
2247:Let's remember that
1995:The Admin's Barnstar
1704:mach up made at the
1640:File:CasinoCards.jpg
1339:Hurtinfornewcurtains
1322:Fabrizio Sotti Image
734:The Ultimate Warrior
3839:uploaded the image
3556:Note on F5 deletion
3523:Request for comment
2940:Rrburke's talk page
2336:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1980:A barnstar for you!
616:so I can make it a
398:MOS:FILM#Soundtrack
4539:yourself? Thanks,
2951:remove this notice
2937:
2713:(which is part of
1867:. Is that okay?
1654:that were used at
753:facepaint symbol.
298:Sega Genesis topic
5039:Knowledge:CONSENT
5026:
5025:
4993:Yours sincerely,
4465:talk page stalker
4189:
4047:
4030:comment added by
3988:Original Research
3906:
3892:comment added by
3615:Replied there. --
2554:talk page stalker
2239:
2044:
2030:comment added by
2016:
2015:
1881:
1833:
1788:
1744:
1697:
1672:
1354:
1337:comment added by
1196:
319:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5419:
5398:
5352:
5280:
5272:
5234:
5227:
5163:
5108:
5047:
5036:
4975:Dear Mr. Latta:
4957:
4914:
4845:
4802:
4735:
4692:
4643:
4620:
4598:
4567:
4547:
4496:
4468:
4452:
4451:
4418:
4366:
4360:
4323:
4276:
4238:
4188:
4179:
4177:
4175:
4150:
4143:
4121:
4106:
4100:
4082:
4046:
4024:
3996:
3961:
3941:
3929:
3923:
3918:
3905:
3886:
3818:
3797:
3756:
3708:
3696:
3652:
3601:
3533:. Your comments
3532:
3484:
3473:
3469:
3468:
3462:
3377:
3332:
3260:
3194:
3186:The Ribbon Route
3149:The Ribbon Route
3110:
2997:
2954:
2901:
2866:
2824:
2804:
2775:was superior to
2733:
2722:
2716:
2712:
2706:
2650:
2623:
2565:
2557:
2496:
2488:
2384:
2348:
2292:
2281:
2275:
2271:
2265:
2261:
2255:
2237:
2233:
2204:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2161:
2160:
2137:
2130:
2091:
2084:
2076:
2061:
2060:
2043:
2024:
1991:
1984:
1983:
1964:
1957:
1953:
1952:
1893:
1871:
1846:
1823:
1805:
1778:
1756:
1734:
1714:
1687:
1662:
1584:
1488:
1418:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1384:
1364:
1353:
1331:
1306:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1235:
1194:
1173:
1053:
1018:
968:
962:
898:
816:
718:
695:
689:
685:
679:
668:
639:
601:
564:
541:
535:
526:
473:
407:
313:
288:
287:
273:
272:
258:
257:
237:
236:
218:
217:
195:
194:
176:
175:
157:
156:
138:
112:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
18:User talk:TLSuda
5427:
5426:
5422:
5421:
5420:
5418:
5417:
5416:
5396:
5350:
5327:
5278:
5266:
5232:
5221:
5197:
5161:
5126:
5106:
5082:
5080:Cockroaches GAC
5045:
5030:
5027:
5009:
5005:
4962:
4932:
4912:
4883:
4843:
4800:
4773:User:Aldercraft
4769:
4733:
4712:
4690:
4669:The Cockroaches
4665:
4637:
4618:
4592:
4565:
4541:
4520:
4494:
4462:
4445:
4444:
4436:
4416:
4390:
4364:
4358:
4355:
4321:
4300:
4274:
4236:
4180:
4173:
4168:
4148:
4137:
4111:
4108:
4104:
4098:
4080:
4055:
4025:
4020:
3994:
3955:
3939:
3927:
3921:
3912:
3887:
3836:
3816:
3791:
3778:
3754:
3706:
3690:
3672:
3650:
3637:
3599:
3558:
3528:
3525:
3482:
3466:
3464:
3456:
3375:
3330:
3258:
3192:
3108:
2991:
2973:
2955:
2944:
2929:
2899:
2864:
2822:
2802:
2769:
2731:
2720:
2714:
2710:
2704:
2678:
2648:
2621:
2559:
2551:
2536:Thanks, Julie
2530:
2494:
2482:
2460:
2426:
2382:
2346:
2310:
2290:
2279:
2273:
2269:
2263:
2259:
2253:
2235:
2222:
2202:
2190:
2188:
2154:
2153:
2135:
2124:
2089:
2078:
2070:
2054:
2053:
2025:
2021:
1982:
1962:
1950:
1948:
1927:
1891:
1844:
1803:
1754:
1712:
1706:WP:Graphics Lab
1648:CasinoCards.jpg
1642:
1582:
1486:
1440:
1416:
1400:
1398:
1382:
1362:
1332:
1324:
1304:
1292:
1290:
1270:
1233:
1209:
1167:
1142:name. Example:
1118:
1051:
1016:
985:
966:
960:
957:
896:
814:
736:
716:
693:
687:
683:
677:
670:
664:
637:
599:
562:
539:
533:
520:
497:
471:
405:
376:instead of the
366:
282:
267:
252:
231:
220:Reid,iain james
212:
189:
170:
151:
123:Urania's Mirror
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5425:
5423:
5415:
5414:
5413:
5412:
5411:
5410:
5326:
5323:
5322:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5318:
5317:
5297:
5296:
5295:
5294:
5293:
5292:
5247:
5246:
5196:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5190:
5189:
5125:
5122:
5121:
5120:
5081:
5078:
5077:
5076:
5060:
5059:
5024:
5023:
5006:
5002:
4974:
4967:
4964:
4963:
4960:
4955:
4931:
4928:
4927:
4926:
4882:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4873:
4872:
4871:
4768:
4765:
4764:
4763:
4762:
4761:
4711:
4706:
4705:
4704:
4664:
4661:
4660:
4659:
4658:
4657:
4656:
4655:
4654:
4653:
4522:Hello TLSuda,
4519:
4512:
4511:
4510:
4509:
4508:
4485:
4484:
4435:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4389:
4384:
4362:PermissionOTRS
4354:
4348:
4347:
4346:
4345:
4344:
4299:
4296:
4295:
4294:
4293:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4289:
4288:
4167:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4107:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4054:
4049:
4019:
4016:
4015:
4014:
4013:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4009:
4008:
3915:Laurelrusswurm
3894:Laurelrusswurm
3858:
3857:
3854:
3851:
3835:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3777:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3671:
3668:
3636:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3570:subst:orfurrev
3557:
3554:
3530:Anna Frodesiak
3524:
3521:
3503:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3423:
3422:
3421:
3420:
3419:
3418:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3390:
3389:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3344:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3281:
3280:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3123:
3122:
3101:
3100:
3084:
3083:
3063:
3062:
3001:
3000:
2972:
2969:
2945:Message added
2943:
2930:
2928:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2768:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2677:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2529:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2459:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2436:
2425:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2339:
2332:
2309:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2221:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2020:
2017:
2014:
2013:
1998:
1997:
1992:
1981:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1929:Permission in
1926:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1645:
1644:Hello, TLSuda.
1641:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1551:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1474:
1473:
1439:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1269:
1268:In Other Words
1266:
1265:
1264:
1248:
1247:
1208:
1205:
1188:Magog the Ogre
1180:
1179:
1164:
1157:
1152:
1145:
1136:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1076:
1069:
984:
981:
956:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
874:
873:
872:
871:
852:
851:
850:
849:
838:
837:
836:
835:
829:
828:
803:
787:
735:
732:
731:
730:
681:PermissionOTRS
669:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
543:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
365:
360:
167:Falkner Island
159:ChrisGualtieri
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5424:
5409:
5405:
5401:
5400:
5399:
5392:. Good luck,
5391:
5387:
5383:
5382:
5381:
5377:
5373:
5372:24.251.41.161
5369:
5365:
5364:
5363:
5359:
5355:
5354:
5353:
5344:
5343:
5342:
5341:
5337:
5333:
5332:24.251.41.161
5324:
5316:
5312:
5308:
5303:
5302:
5301:
5300:
5299:
5298:
5291:
5287:
5283:
5282:
5281:
5270:
5265:
5264:
5263:
5259:
5255:
5251:
5250:
5249:
5248:
5245:
5241:
5237:
5236:
5235:
5225:
5220:
5219:
5218:
5217:
5213:
5209:
5204:
5203:
5194:
5188:
5184:
5180:
5176:
5175:
5174:
5170:
5166:
5165:
5164:
5156:
5152:
5148:
5147:
5146:
5145:
5141:
5137:
5132:
5129:
5123:
5119:
5115:
5111:
5110:
5109:
5101:
5100:
5099:
5098:
5094:
5090:
5086:
5079:
5075:
5071:
5067:
5062:
5061:
5058:
5054:
5050:
5049:
5048:
5040:
5034:
5029:
5028:
5022:
5021:
5017:
5012:
5001:
4997:
4994:
4991:
4987:
4983:
4982:
4976:
4972:
4966:
4965:
4958:
4954:
4950:
4946:
4943:
4939:
4935:
4934:Dear TLSuda:
4929:
4925:
4921:
4917:
4916:
4915:
4907:
4903:
4902:
4901:
4900:
4896:
4892:
4888:
4880:
4870:
4866:
4862:
4858:
4857:
4856:
4852:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4837:
4833:
4829:
4828:
4827:
4823:
4819:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4809:
4805:
4804:
4803:
4794:
4793:
4792:
4791:
4787:
4783:
4778:
4774:
4766:
4760:
4756:
4752:
4748:
4747:
4746:
4742:
4738:
4737:
4736:
4728:
4727:
4726:
4725:
4721:
4717:
4710:
4707:
4703:
4699:
4695:
4694:
4693:
4685:
4684:
4683:
4682:
4678:
4674:
4670:
4662:
4652:
4648:
4644:
4642:
4641:
4633:
4632:
4631:
4627:
4623:
4622:
4621:
4613:
4609:
4608:
4607:
4603:
4599:
4597:
4596:
4588:
4584:
4580:
4579:
4578:
4574:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4559:
4558:
4557:
4556:
4552:
4548:
4546:
4545:
4537:
4533:
4529:
4523:
4517:
4513:
4507:
4503:
4499:
4498:
4497:
4489:
4488:
4487:
4486:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4471:
4466:
4461:
4460:
4459:
4458:
4455:
4453:
4450:
4449:
4441:
4433:
4429:
4425:
4421:
4420:
4419:
4410:
4409:
4408:
4407:
4403:
4399:
4395:
4388:
4385:
4383:
4382:
4378:
4374:
4370:
4363:
4352:
4349:
4343:
4340:
4336:
4335:
4334:
4330:
4326:
4325:
4324:
4315:
4314:
4313:
4312:
4309:
4305:
4297:
4287:
4283:
4279:
4278:
4277:
4269:
4268:
4267:
4263:
4259:
4255:
4252:I dealt with
4251:
4250:
4249:
4245:
4241:
4240:
4239:
4231:
4227:
4224:
4221:
4217:
4213:
4212:
4211:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4187:
4183:
4176:
4165:
4161:
4157:
4153:
4152:
4151:
4141:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4129:
4125:
4119:
4115:
4103:
4097:
4093:
4089:
4085:
4084:
4083:
4075:
4074:
4073:
4072:
4068:
4064:
4060:
4053:
4048:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4033:
4029:
4017:
4007:
4003:
3999:
3998:
3997:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3972:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3959:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3948:
3944:
3943:
3942:
3934:
3926:
3916:
3911:
3910:
3909:
3908:
3907:
3903:
3899:
3895:
3891:
3883:
3880:
3874:
3869:
3865:
3861:
3855:
3852:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3843:
3841:
3833:
3829:
3825:
3821:
3820:
3819:
3811:
3806:
3801:
3795:
3790:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3784:
3775:
3767:
3763:
3759:
3758:
3757:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3733:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3720:
3719:
3715:
3711:
3710:
3709:
3701:
3694:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3682:
3678:
3669:
3667:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3654:
3653:
3646:
3642:
3635:
3632:
3626:
3622:
3618:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3608:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3594:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3567:
3564:, as you did
3563:
3555:
3553:
3552:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3531:
3522:
3520:
3519:
3515:
3511:
3510:Susan Macafee
3506:
3495:
3491:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3477:
3472:
3460:
3459:Susan Macafee
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3432:Susan Macafee
3429:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3424:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3397:Susan Macafee
3394:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3388:
3384:
3380:
3379:
3378:
3370:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3358:Susan Macafee
3343:
3339:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3295:Susan Macafee
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3247:
3243:
3242:Susan Macafee
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3223:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3187:
3182:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3172:
3168:
3164:
3163:Susan Macafee
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3150:
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3121:
3117:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3103:
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3085:
3082:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3065:
3064:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3003:
3002:
2995:
2994:Susan Macafee
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2978:Susan Macafee
2970:
2968:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2952:
2948:
2941:
2934:
2926:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2858:
2857:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2797:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2767:
2764:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2726:
2719:
2709:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2686:a png version
2683:
2675:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2643:
2640:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2602:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2563:
2555:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2533:
2527:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2486:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2465:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2435:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2423:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2340:
2337:
2333:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2285:
2278:
2277:PD-ineligible
2268:
2258:
2250:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2232:
2227:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2196:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2175:Custardpieboy
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2128:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2111:Custardpieboy
2102:
2098:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2082:
2081:Custardpieboy
2074:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2064:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2032:Custardpieboy
2029:
2018:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2003:Susan Macafee
2000:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1985:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1956:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1925:
1922:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1879:
1875:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1831:
1827:
1822:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1786:
1782:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1707:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1670:
1666:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1652:playing cards
1649:
1639:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1552:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1481:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1437:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1411:
1406:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1328:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1298:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1177:
1171:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1115:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
982:
980:
979:
976:
972:
965:
954:
944:
941:
938:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
916:
911:
910:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
890:
889:
888:
885:
882:
878:
877:
876:
875:
869:
865:
861:
856:
855:
854:
853:
846:
842:
841:
840:
839:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
819:
818:
817:
808:
805:The way that
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
781:
776:
775:
774:
773:
770:
767:
762:
760:
754:
750:
748:
742:
739:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
710:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
692:
682:
675:
667:
662:
650:
646:
642:
641:
640:
631:
630:
629:
626:
623:
619:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
593:
592:
591:
588:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
566:
565:
557:
553:
548:
544:
538:
530:
524:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
510:
506:
502:
494:
484:
480:
476:
475:
474:
466:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
399:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
364:
361:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
311:
307:
301:
299:
295:
291:
286:
280:
276:
271:
265:
261:
256:
250:
249:
248:The Lion King
244:
240:
235:
229:
225:
221:
216:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
187:
183:
179:
174:
168:
164:
160:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
125:
124:
119:
115:
111:
102:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5394:
5393:
5348:
5347:
5328:
5276:
5275:
5230:
5229:
5200:
5198:
5159:
5158:
5133:
5130:
5127:
5104:
5103:
5083:
5043:
5042:
5013:
5010:
4998:
4995:
4992:
4988:
4984:
4977:
4973:
4969:
4951:
4947:
4944:
4940:
4936:
4933:
4910:
4909:
4884:
4841:
4840:
4798:
4797:
4770:
4731:
4730:
4713:
4688:
4687:
4666:
4639:
4638:
4616:
4615:
4594:
4593:
4563:
4562:
4543:
4542:
4524:
4521:
4492:
4491:
4447:
4446:
4437:
4414:
4413:
4391:
4368:
4356:
4350:
4319:
4318:
4301:
4272:
4271:
4254:otrs:7563544
4234:
4233:
4222:
4170:You deleted
4169:
4146:
4145:
4117:
4109:
4078:
4077:
4056:
4026:āĀ Preceding
4021:
3992:
3991:
3937:
3936:
3888:āĀ Preceding
3875:
3871:
3866:
3862:
3859:
3845:
3837:
3814:
3813:
3779:
3752:
3751:
3704:
3703:
3673:
3649:
3638:
3597:
3596:
3559:
3526:
3507:
3504:
3480:
3479:
3474:image is at
3470:
3373:
3372:
3354:
3328:
3327:
3256:
3255:
3190:
3189:
3185:
3148:
3106:
3105:
2974:
2956:
2897:
2896:
2883:āMicrochip08
2862:
2861:
2847:āMicrochip08
2820:
2819:
2800:
2799:
2781:āMicrochip08
2770:
2729:
2728:
2679:
2655:
2646:
2645:
2619:
2618:
2534:
2531:
2492:
2491:
2461:
2427:
2380:
2379:
2344:
2343:
2311:
2288:
2287:
2249:WP:Consensus
2229:
2223:
2200:
2199:
2194:
2172:
2156:
2155:
2133:
2132:
2107:
2087:
2086:
2056:
2055:
2026:āĀ Preceding
2022:
1994:
1960:
1959:
1954:
1928:
1889:
1888:
1842:
1841:
1801:
1800:
1774:rationale?
1752:
1751:
1710:
1709:
1643:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1514:
1484:
1483:
1441:
1414:
1413:
1404:
1380:
1379:
1360:
1359:
1333:āĀ Preceding
1329:
1325:
1302:
1301:
1296:
1274:
1271:
1231:
1230:
1213:
1210:
1181:
1170:talk at enwp
1139:
1122:
1120:Hi, TLSuda.
1119:
1089:
1049:
1048:
1014:
1013:
986:
958:
937:InedibleHulk
914:
894:
893:
881:InedibleHulk
863:
844:
812:
811:
766:InedibleHulk
763:
755:
751:
743:
740:
737:
714:
713:
691:OTRS pending
671:
635:
634:
597:
596:
560:
559:
498:
469:
468:
403:
402:
367:
302:
246:
129:
121:
114:Adam Cuerden
106:
78:
43:
37:
5370:Thank you.
5179:EnigmaMcmxc
5136:EnigmaMcmxc
4834:policy and
4357:If you add
4258:Microchip08
4216:Microchip08
4202:Microchip08
4182:Eric Cable
4166:Question...
3728:CurtisNaito
3693:CurtisNaito
3677:CurtisNaito
2267:PD-textlogo
2236:message me!
2127:NahidSultan
2073:NahidSultan
1869:NintendoFan
1821:NintendoFan
1776:NintendoFan
1732:NintendoFan
1685:NintendoFan
1660:NintendoFan
1131:. Example:
860:always been
672:You marked
294:submissions
290:Red Phoenix
279:submissions
264:submissions
260:Igordebraga
243:submissions
224:submissions
201:submissions
182:submissions
163:submissions
144:submissions
118:submissions
36:This is an
4908:. Cheers,
4751:Otus scops
4230:WP:Consent
4214:Yes, what
3812:. Cheers,
3810:WP:Consent
3750:. Cheers,
3700:WP:Consent
3539:Jim Carter
3478:. Cheers,
2958:-- Rrburke
2949:. You can
2779:? Thanks,
2749:Otus scops
2690:Otus scops
2512:Otus scops
2485:Otus scops
2469:Otus scops
2404:Light show
2400:film still
2365:Light show
2318:Light show
1482:. Cheers,
1480:WP:CONSENT
1412:. Cheers,
1300:. Cheers,
1254:Sfan00 IMG
1216:Sfan00 IMG
973:. Thanks.
618:good topic
239:Cwmhiraeth
178:Cliftonian
95:ArchiveĀ 10
5151:WP:NFCC#1
5066:John Hill
5033:John Hill
4640:Steel1943
4595:Steel1943
4583:WP:CSD#F8
4544:Steel1943
4369:Evidence:
4351:Evidence:
4059:WP:NFCC#8
3980:WP:NFCC#8
3976:WP:NFCC#1
3933:WP:NFCC#1
3925:PD-Canada
3868:Commons."
3864:Commons.
3800:WP:NFCC#1
3783:Ben Stone
3776:Hansa jet
3657:Say Hello
3562:WP:CSD#F5
3505:Hi Suda,
2642:Connormah
2606:Connormah
2584:Connormah
2568:Connormah
2284:WP:NFCC#1
2257:PD-simple
1624:Blarcrean
1606:Blarcrean
1556:Blarcrean
1541:Blarcrean
1518:Blarcrean
1463:Blarcrean
1445:Blarcrean
1330:Thanks!
1207:A Backlog
1184:WP:CSD#F8
1140:different
795:WP:NFCC#8
791:WP:NFCC#1
747:recentism
663:Files by
620:.--v/r -
582:.--v/r -
556:WP:NFCC#8
552:WP:NFCC#1
431:WP:NFCC#8
321:J Milburn
186:Ian Smith
90:ArchiveĀ 9
85:ArchiveĀ 8
79:ArchiveĀ 7
73:ArchiveĀ 6
68:ArchiveĀ 5
60:ArchiveĀ 1
5346:Cheers,
5307:tdempsey
5269:Tdempsey
5254:tdempsey
5224:Tdempsey
5208:tdempsey
5134:Regards
4861:Deadstar
4839:Cheers,
4818:Deadstar
4782:Deadstar
4663:GAC help
4434:Hi again
4226:contribs
4040:contribs
4028:unsigned
3902:contribs
3890:unsigned
3794:Benstown
3541:through
3417:Hi Suda,
3079:, &
3057:, &
2927:Talkback
2660:JSFarman
2614:JSFarman
2592:JSFarman
2562:JSFarman
2538:JSFarman
2198:Cheers,
2040:contribs
2028:unsigned
1958:Cheers,
1878:Contribs
1830:Contribs
1785:Contribs
1772:fair use
1741:Contribs
1694:Contribs
1669:Contribs
1347:contribs
1335:unsigned
975:Armbrust
780:WP:UNDUE
759:slightly
501:this PDF
423:WP:MUSIC
345:Miyagawa
333:The ed17
5325:Hi Suda
4906:WP:BOLD
4891:Werieth
4881:Request
4859:Thanks
4832:WP:NFCC
4716:Stefan2
4532:WT:CASC
4474:Stefan2
4448:~ Nahid
4398:Stefan2
4373:Stefan2
4140:Stefan2
4124:Stefan2
4063:Stefan2
4032:Michy19
3984:WP:NFCC
3748:WP:NFCC
3661:My Work
3617:Stefan2
3578:Stefan2
2971:Hi Suda
2604:Thanks
2444:Stefan2
2157:~ Nahid
2057:~ Nahid
1865:Casinos
1796:WP:NFCC
1656:casinos
1277:Panthus
1094:Stefan2
1037:Rodolph
993:Rodolph
964:mfd top
807:WP:NFCC
784:WP:NFCC
698:Stefan2
666:Kcida10
547:WP:NFCC
503:on the
465:WP:NFCC
451:Aspects
436:Aspects
382:Aspects
281:) and
209:narwhal
197:Caponer
140:Godot13
39:archive
5397:TLSuda
5351:TLSuda
5279:TLSuda
5233:TLSuda
5162:TLSuda
5107:TLSuda
5046:TLSuda
4913:TLSuda
4844:TLSuda
4836:WP:NFC
4801:TLSuda
4734:TLSuda
4691:TLSuda
4619:TLSuda
4612:WP:RPP
4566:TLSuda
4528:WP:CSD
4495:TLSuda
4417:TLSuda
4322:TLSuda
4275:TLSuda
4237:TLSuda
4149:TLSuda
4081:TLSuda
3995:TLSuda
3958:TLSuda
3940:TLSuda
3817:TLSuda
3755:TLSuda
3743:WP:NFC
3707:TLSuda
3600:TLSuda
3483:TLSuda
3376:TLSuda
3331:TLSuda
3259:TLSuda
3193:TLSuda
3109:TLSuda
3095:&
2900:TLSuda
2865:TLSuda
2823:TLSuda
2803:TLSuda
2732:TLSuda
2725:WP:FFD
2649:TLSuda
2622:TLSuda
2495:TLSuda
2383:TLSuda
2347:TLSuda
2291:TLSuda
2272:&
2231:STATic
2203:TLSuda
2136:TLSuda
2090:TLSuda
1963:TLSuda
1892:TLSuda
1845:TLSuda
1804:TLSuda
1755:TLSuda
1713:TLSuda
1583:TLSuda
1487:TLSuda
1417:TLSuda
1383:TLSuda
1363:TLSuda
1305:TLSuda
1234:TLSuda
1090:by now
1052:TLSuda
1017:TLSuda
983:Dawley
940:(talk)
897:TLSuda
884:(talk)
868:Droopy
862:about
848:issue.
815:TLSuda
769:(talk)
717:TLSuda
638:TLSuda
600:TLSuda
563:TLSuda
529:WP:AGF
523:TParis
472:TLSuda
427:WP:GNG
406:TLSuda
343:) and
251:from
245:) and
230:from
211:from
130:Gefion
5128:Hey,
4186:Talk
3971:WP:OR
3651:Aalox
2718:orfud
2684:with
1935:Ankry
1035:date?
676:with
353:email
341:email
329:email
228:tiger
16:<
5404:talk
5376:talk
5358:talk
5336:talk
5311:talk
5286:talk
5258:talk
5240:talk
5212:talk
5183:talk
5169:talk
5140:talk
5114:talk
5093:talk
5070:talk
5053:talk
4920:talk
4895:talk
4865:talk
4851:talk
4822:talk
4808:talk
4786:talk
4755:talk
4741:talk
4720:talk
4698:talk
4677:talk
4647:talk
4626:talk
4602:talk
4573:talk
4551:talk
4502:talk
4478:talk
4440:here
4424:talk
4402:talk
4377:talk
4329:talk
4282:talk
4262:talk
4244:talk
4220:talk
4206:talk
4156:talk
4128:talk
4088:talk
4067:talk
4036:talk
4002:talk
3947:talk
3898:talk
3824:talk
3762:talk
3732:talk
3714:talk
3681:talk
3621:talk
3607:talk
3582:talk
3572:}} (
3566:here
3547:talk
3535:here
3514:talk
3490:talk
3471:Done
3436:talk
3401:talk
3383:talk
3362:talk
3338:talk
3299:talk
3266:talk
3246:talk
3200:talk
3167:talk
3116:talk
2982:talk
2962:talk
2907:talk
2887:talk
2872:talk
2851:talk
2830:talk
2810:talk
2785:talk
2753:talk
2739:talk
2694:talk
2664:talk
2644:and
2629:talk
2596:talk
2588:talk
2572:talk
2542:talk
2532:Hi,
2516:talk
2502:talk
2473:talk
2448:talk
2408:talk
2390:talk
2369:talk
2354:talk
2322:talk
2298:talk
2226:here
2210:talk
2195:Done
2179:talk
2143:talk
2115:talk
2097:talk
2036:talk
2007:talk
1970:talk
1955:Done
1939:talk
1899:talk
1874:Talk
1861:here
1852:talk
1826:Talk
1811:talk
1781:Talk
1762:talk
1737:Talk
1720:talk
1690:Talk
1681:here
1665:Talk
1628:talk
1610:talk
1590:talk
1560:talk
1545:talk
1522:talk
1494:talk
1467:talk
1449:talk
1424:talk
1408:see
1405:Done
1390:talk
1370:talk
1343:talk
1312:talk
1297:Done
1281:talk
1258:talk
1241:talk
1220:talk
1098:talk
1075:yet.
1059:talk
1041:talk
1024:talk
1009:URAA
997:talk
904:talk
822:talk
738:Hi.
724:talk
702:talk
645:talk
607:talk
570:talk
479:talk
455:talk
440:talk
425:and
413:talk
386:talk
349:talk
337:talk
325:talk
275:Czar
128:SMS
4339:Rod
4308:Rod
2582:Hi
1683:.
955:MFD
915:our
864:the
331:),
226:),
5406:)
5378:)
5360:)
5338:)
5313:)
5288:)
5260:)
5242:)
5214:)
5206:--
5185:)
5171:)
5142:)
5116:)
5095:)
5072:)
5055:)
4922:)
4897:)
4867:)
4853:)
4824:)
4810:)
4788:)
4757:)
4743:)
4722:)
4700:)
4679:)
4649:)
4628:)
4604:)
4575:)
4553:)
4504:)
4480:)
4426:)
4404:)
4379:)
4365:}}
4359:{{
4331:)
4284:)
4264:)
4246:)
4208:)
4184:|
4158:)
4130:)
4120:}}
4112:{{
4105:}}
4099:{{
4090:)
4069:)
4042:)
4038:ā¢
4004:)
3949:)
3928:}}
3922:{{
3904:)
3900:ā¢
3826:)
3764:)
3734:)
3716:)
3683:)
3663:)
3659:ā¢
3647:-
3623:)
3609:)
3584:)
3549:)
3516:)
3492:)
3463:-
3438:)
3403:)
3385:)
3364:)
3340:)
3301:)
3268:)
3248:)
3202:)
3169:)
3118:)
3091:,
3075:,
3071:,
3053:,
3049:,
3045:,
3041:,
3037:,
3033:,
3029:,
3025:,
3021:,
3017:,
3013:,
3009:,
2984:)
2964:)
2909:)
2889:)
2874:)
2853:)
2832:)
2812:)
2787:)
2755:)
2741:)
2721:}}
2715:{{
2711:}}
2705:{{
2696:)
2666:)
2656:is
2631:)
2598:)
2574:)
2558:-
2544:)
2518:)
2504:)
2475:)
2467:--
2450:)
2442:--
2410:)
2392:)
2371:)
2356:)
2324:)
2300:)
2280:}}
2274:{{
2270:}}
2264:{{
2262:,
2260:}}
2254:{{
2212:)
2181:)
2145:)
2117:)
2099:)
2042:)
2038:ā¢
2009:)
1972:)
1941:)
1901:)
1876:,
1854:)
1828:,
1813:)
1783:,
1764:)
1739:,
1722:)
1692:,
1667:,
1630:)
1612:)
1592:)
1562:)
1547:)
1524:)
1496:)
1469:)
1451:)
1426:)
1392:)
1372:)
1349:)
1345:ā¢
1314:)
1283:)
1260:)
1243:)
1222:)
1200:)
1195:ā¢
1172:}}
1168:{{
1100:)
1061:)
1043:)
1026:)
999:)
967:}}
961:{{
906:)
845:is
824:)
726:)
704:)
694:}}
688:{{
684:}}
678:{{
647:)
609:)
572:)
540:}}
534:{{
481:)
457:)
442:)
415:)
388:)
355:)
351:ā¢
339:ā¢
327:ā¢
64:ā
5402:(
5374:(
5356:(
5334:(
5309:(
5284:(
5271::
5267:@
5256:(
5238:(
5226::
5222:@
5210:(
5181:(
5167:(
5138:(
5112:(
5091:(
5068:(
5051:(
5035::
5031:@
4918:(
4893:(
4863:(
4849:(
4820:(
4806:(
4784:(
4753:(
4739:(
4718:(
4696:(
4675:(
4645:(
4624:(
4600:(
4571:(
4549:(
4518:?
4500:(
4476:(
4467:)
4463:(
4422:(
4400:(
4375:(
4327:(
4280:(
4260:(
4242:(
4223:Ā·
4218:(
4204:(
4154:(
4142::
4138:@
4126:(
4116:|
4086:(
4065:(
4034:(
4000:(
3960::
3956:@
3945:(
3917::
3913:@
3896:(
3822:(
3796::
3792:@
3760:(
3730:(
3712:(
3695::
3691:@
3679:(
3655:(
3619:(
3605:(
3580:(
3545:(
3512:(
3488:(
3461::
3457:@
3434:(
3399:(
3381:(
3360:(
3336:(
3297:(
3264:(
3244:(
3198:(
3165:(
3114:(
2996::
2992:@
2980:(
2960:(
2942:.
2905:(
2885:(
2870:(
2849:(
2828:(
2808:(
2783:(
2751:(
2737:(
2692:(
2662:(
2627:(
2594:(
2586:(
2570:(
2564::
2560:@
2556:)
2552:(
2540:(
2514:(
2500:(
2487::
2483:@
2471:(
2446:(
2406:(
2388:(
2367:(
2352:(
2338:)
2320:(
2296:(
2208:(
2177:(
2141:(
2129::
2125:@
2113:(
2095:(
2083::
2079:@
2075::
2071:@
2034:(
2005:(
1968:(
1937:(
1897:(
1880:)
1872:(
1850:(
1832:)
1824:(
1809:(
1787:)
1779:(
1760:(
1743:)
1735:(
1718:(
1696:)
1688:(
1671:)
1663:(
1626:(
1608:(
1588:(
1558:(
1543:(
1520:(
1492:(
1465:(
1447:(
1422:(
1388:(
1368:(
1341:(
1310:(
1279:(
1256:(
1239:(
1218:(
1198:c
1192:t
1190:(
1178:.
1163:.
1151:.
1135:.
1096:(
1083:.
1057:(
1039:(
1022:(
995:(
902:(
820:(
786:.
722:(
700:(
643:(
625:P
622:T
605:(
587:P
584:T
568:(
525::
521:@
512:P
509:T
477:(
453:(
438:(
411:(
384:(
347:(
335:(
323:(
318:.
292:(
277:(
262:(
241:(
222:(
199:(
180:(
161:(
142:(
116:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.