User talk:TLSuda/Archive 8

2525:. It's in only 3 databases (far as I can see), so the section is smaller and not presented as a list. I also just noticed that I didn't respond to 2 of your questions... "Does any source include the reason why the journal went to online only?": I happen to know that it was for financial reasons (not enough paper subscriptions any more), but although the person who told me that certainly is reliable and "in the know", that still is not an RS in the WP sense... I'll keep an eye out for a source, perhaps the society will post some minutes or something like that. "In the reception section, the journals that cited it the most often, it lists this journal itself". That is indeed correct and almost always the case for specialist journals in a smaller field. This journal gets citations from many different journals (it's rather interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary, so that too is to be expected) , so even though it is itself one of the top 5 "citers", the proportion of self-citations is actually pretty low (3%, I've seen journals go over 50%...). Of course, although all these figures can be reliably sourced, their interpretation is mine, so it cannot be included in the article. That's generally a problem with articles on academic journals, because preciously little is written 1088:(F7: Violates non-free content criterion #1). However, I believe this deletion was made in error, as there is no free equivalent with which the photo can be replaced, and therefore the photo does in fact fall within the first non-free content criterion. I realize the image is owned by 20th Century Fox (it is in fact an official studio publicity still) and shows my subject in character as Ira in their feature Romancing the Stone, but that is precisely the point of including this particular photograph: to show Mr. Norman as he is most easily recognized by the public, which is as this particular character in this particular film. Of course I could replace the image with a photo of Mr. Norman as he looks in everyday life, but that would defeat the purpose. There, I would like to request that you please reconsider and reinstate the file as it was prior to your deletion. Thank you so much! Best regards, 1900:

pageview statistics to show what viewers prefer is to have pageview statistics for the song article being at Yesterday and a separate statistics for it being at Yesterday (song). You would have to have this data from the same period, and you would have to account for the people who are attempting to go to the final page, but go through Yesterday first (ie subtract a calculated percentage of the pageviews for people who want to end up at Yesterday (Toni Braxton song) but had to first go through Yesterday, then click the link to the disambig page Yesterday (disambiguation) then to their final destination. I felt that if I had included in my close about the statistics, that in all transparency, I would have to include that information.

1310: 1343:

WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Knowledge:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Knowledge talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck!

4368:"pinging" is using a template that mentions your name (see the @BeatlesVox at the beginning of this sentence) that tells our software to send you a notification which displays at the top of your screen. I assume that is what brought you here. I "pinged" you to let you know that I had replied here. "Watch this page" adds a page to your Watchlist. You can check your watchlist where it will show you the most recent edits to those pages that you add. You would see all edits to that page. Most people use it when they are trying to follow a conversation (like here) or are watching out for vandalism (on articles). I hope that helps. Cheers, 576:

their privacy, which is clearly not the case. And your suggestion to share a private email exchange without consent is clearly not a respect of their privacy. If I uploaded it under the wrong description, then I offer to correct that mistake if you undelete the file. Only thing was I was informed only about 29 minutes before the file was deleted. If I offered contact for confirmation, I'd be shooting myself in the foot if I didn't obtain their consent. I'll re-fill the form with the right info as mentioned. Problem is I spend only a certain amount of time on wiki per day. Regards--

3656:

no issues collaborating with you on anything; your work is high quality and you are patient and easy to work with. You are open and up front about everything. I wish I had the skillset that you have, but I simply don't. That being said, I hope you understand that if I don't work on something, its not personal. I enjoy working with you, and I don't want that to stop, but I also will ride the fine line to prevent issues from arising. I started looking over the BabyFirst article and it looks good, I've only noticed a few minor issues (none related to "typical" COI issues. Cheers,

1510:

sourced description of the killer, (which probably would not be notable), nor is there any content about why we need to see the killer. It was purely used for an identification purpose. If it had been in the article for any other reason, I might agree with you about it being necessary. But, it has been my experience that few articles with images of killers like this, survive with keeping the image. If there were an article about the killer, an image used for identification would be more appropriate. But the killer would have to independently pass

1199: 3641:

point-of-view is nauseating. However, I think the cloud of speculation and drama that follows COI is just something that comes with collaborating with me. Whoever does those GA reviews will probably be someone I've known longer than you and collaborated on more articles with, and whoever does them will be exposed to the same risk of drama-mongering. Editors that try to prevent being seen as my ally tend to disagree with me arbitrarily (even when I'm right) just to avoid being seen agreeing with me too often. It's all just garbage.

3489:

concerns on the talk page about the advantages/disadvantages section (far too much is unsourced or irrelevant), but I believe the Scientific studies section should be included in some form. That is relevant information (in my opinion) and seems to be at least decently sourced (may need a bit of work). It is not 100% relevant, but the sentence "Align paid OrthoClear $ 20 million and it agreed to end its operations." which company does "it" refer to? I also assume that you will include the non-free media

4649: 31: 1414:"failure", but the uploader did comment that all available information was in the description. Further, the uploader, Tutelary, voted "Keep"; another editor, Mandruss, did not formally enter a "Keep" vote, but did contribute to the discussion with information and a reduction in image resolution in an effort to prevent the file's deletion. I'm not sure how you concluded that consensus was to delete. More information, please? Thanks.— 1328: 1250: 4126: 1213: 1269: 1292: 3015:. I also did review the OTRS ticket and checked the comment by the OTRS volunteer who is handling the ticket. There was not sufficient information to verify permission. Further permission information was requested, but no reply has been received. If this information is received the image can be restored. If the OTRS agent contacts me, I would happily restore the file for him. Cheers, 2044:

normal counts are like? Or your group to show what counts will be like now that it is moved to a different name? Etc etc. You gathered some great information, but it is hardly enough to come to full fledged conclusions. But regardless, I digress. Your data had no baring on my interpretation of the consensus of the discussion; rather I only felt it wasn't worth mentioning in the close.

1921:

article, the remaining 58,418 bona-fide destination views of that article would still constitute 64.6% of the total—a mere 1.2 percentage points less than the figure in the table. In other words, even if the stats were "biased" to the maximum possible extent of the way you describe, the effect would be negligible and have no impact on the conclusions to be drawn from the data. —

3159: 603:. The other alternative is unless they've can explicitly released the image under a specific free license on a website (such as their official website, or Flickr). If you re-upload the image without having permission supplied, it will be re-deleted. If you have them submit permission, I will personally restore the image, but we need permission under a free license. 3524:

content we're on the same page. Whether you delete it as cleanup of poorly-sourced medical claims, or just tack it on to the bottom for now, in either case I'll need to work on a more polished section for it before it is GA-ready. It is probably the most important section of the article and also the most difficult, which is why it warrants special attention.

4571: 4145:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4792: 4178: 888: 2114:. While the American Political Science Association or their authors own their annual meeting paper copyrights, the idea that either would ever object to the use of a chart appearing in one of them is, well, I would just say it's very profoundly unlikely, around the one in a million level. Would you please restore the graph? 770:

situation started. Since we cannot yet verify the listed source as the newspaper, but we can verify the other web sources (pre-upload dates). As soon as I get a response back, I will let you know. If the response back is that the photo originally came from the newspaper, I will delete the image immediately. Cheers,

1718:. While I don't object to the result, I would submit that the closure may have been premature, there being insufficient demonstration of consensus. I also feel that the summary of the discussion could be improved, particularly in that it frames the debate entirely in terms of whether or not the article was the 595:

email. I'm telling you that you have to have the copyright holder send an email with permission. If they send the email to you, you can forward it for them. 3) You cannot upload a photo that you did not create without the copyright holder submitting a statement of permission (usually through the process with

4507:

Actually it is absolutely a copyright violation. The movie (and every scene from it) is copyright to the production/distribution company. Even just one clip that you've screenshot is owned by that company. By uploading it and claiming it as your own, you are violating copyright, which is illegal. We

4232:

As a clear example, I happened to stumble into your brief message saying that you had deleted the photo. I found it by looking back at my “Contributions” page and clicking on the "Media Copyright” contribution that I had made earlier. (That is, it wasn't on my talk page, Eeekster's talk page or your

3767:

Hello, I was away from Knowledge for a while. You deleted File:StereocardCarabao.jpg - (F4: File without a source for more than 7 days) was the reason stated on April 25,2014. I need to work on the file again, but don't remember what parameters were missing since image was on Carabao page for several

3488:

This isn't usually an area I work in, and I generally have more than enough tasks in the areas I am familiar. I've decided to read it and give it a try. After reading both your draft and the main article, yours is a major improvement, and is much more encyclopedic and polished well. I agree with your

2047:

Aside from that, I don't think there is any further discussion to be had. I've given you multiple options if you think that my close was made in error (not that you disagree with it). Please take advantage of those if you feel the need. I'm not perfect, none of us here are. I can make mistakes. This

1087:

Hi TLSuda. I just signed into Knowledge for the first time in a while, noticed that you had deleted a photo file I had uploaded onto an article I wrote about actor Zack Norman, and saw this message: 00:43, 3 June 2014 TLSuda (talk | contribs) deleted page File:As Ira in Romancing the Stone (1984).jpg

594:

You are completely misunderstanding me. 1) By posting their email address online anywhere, anyone can sell that to spammers, or spam it themselves. If you did that to my email address, I would be very upset. That's why I think that is disrespectful. 2) I'm not asking you to forward a private/personal

522:

However, based on the text of the description page, and on your comment here, you claim to have permission to use the image. If you have permission to use the image under a free license, then it could've been kept with evidence of permission It is up to the uploader to provide evidence of permission.

447:

The bot does that from time to time. When I log in to do some administrative tasks, usually deletion of images from PUF, FFD and CSD, I have a process where I check all of the boards daily. Or I check past days if I don't log in. Those days were right after I got the mop, so I didn't have my pattern

5127:

and removed it. This is a "mistake" I will probably make in the future. The good thing is, if there is no good reason to keep it deleted, I will always happily restore it. Let me know if you need anything else, even if its completely unrelated. I'm always happy to work for editors who are dedicated

4274:

Hey Rob! No worries on the photo, you handled it quickly and professionally. I've "pinged" you so you get a notification that I mentioned you. This is usually the way people find out that there is a discussion. If you are eager to learn about Knowledge and how to edit, I would suggest particpating

3523:

Oops, good catch. I fixed it just now so it specifies that Orthoclear was the one that agreed to end its operations. I can't use non-free images in user-space for copyright reasons, but typically I restore them afterwards as a "non-controversial edit" allowed by WP:COI. For the peer-reviewed journal

3465:

that should make it almost GA-ready, except that it will also need a summary of what is said about it in medical journals before it's done (next on my To Do list). I don't know if this kind of thing interests you, but if you have time to review the article and respond to the Request Edit it would be

2937:

I'm sorry but you have a misunderstanding of copyright. That CSD tag that you added is for when the copyright license is incorrect, invalid or incomplete. A copyright image's license is copyright and the tag matches that. You are interpreting it as the tag is being used inappropriately which is what

2899:

Worse, the article was created by someone who has admitted to promoting the movie/director/actor. I still think that this is yet another example of the dreadful handling of images on Knowledge: I am far from being a stupid person but your explanation does not tally with what the file templates said,

1518:

it generally does not apply to matters of copyright or BLP situations because these have legal ramifications. Also, fair use law and Knowledge policy are completely different and we are much stricter. This is due to our mission to promote free content. That brings me to, of course, one last option.

1485:

is quite applicable. It just makes common sense to include an image in the article; it is highly unlikely that its copyright will ever be challenged because of fair use principles. Nothing personal, but I think both you and the nominator are "picking nits". The outcome fails to meet the requirements

1443:

to be satisfied, there absolutely has to be sourced third-party critical commentary about the image. There is no discussion about the image that warrants needing the photo. "...and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." This is specifically talking about the text itself. Can you

3655:

Believe me when I say that I agree that it is all garbage. I believe that there is more inappropriate/unethical gaming of the system by just volunteers than there are for most COI editors. That part of the system is highly flawed and I think editors like you catch more flack than necessary. I have

3232:

that maybe the entertainment group created this for the college, but it includes a crest, which usually predate any sort of outsourced graphic design as such. Also, their website uses a slightly different (better in my opinion) version of this logo. It might be best to keep it as non-free unless we

2585:

Hello, I think you erred in deleting this file. This was a picture of Dexter as a 14 year old dancing the Twist as discussed at length in the article. Dexter is now nearly seventy so clearly no free equivalent can now be produced of this image as his appearance has changed beyond recognition. Could

1920:

of the 3,061 views of the disambiguation page was an instance of a reader who first viewed the article about the Beatles song but was actually seeking one of the other "Yesterday"-related topics, and we therefore subtracted 3,061 non-destination views from the 61,479 total views of the Beatles song

1799:

The default length of a formal request for closure is 30 days; if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full

1755:

I came here to make a similar request. While I like the song and opposed the change, my goal was primarily to make sure the discussion was clear. I used to be a big DAB page contributor and have thought through a lot of these arguments and would like the reasonable interpretation Jaydiem provides

1571:

Hello, Would you mind restoring Fredcopeman.jpg, I'll get an appropriate fair-use statement written for it within 24 hours of it being restored (assuming it gets restored by Wednesday night). Sorry for the delay, work and a short vacation were busier than expected. But I've some free time over the

769:

The uploader says it came from "Internet" and listed that newspaper as the source. That newspaper does not have a website. They do have a Facebook page, which I reached out to, and the owners don't seem to know anything about the photo. I've reached out to the newspaper, but no response since this

1891:

As for your particular contributions to the discussion, I did absolutely consider those in my close. You are correct, however, that I did not include them in the closing statement. My reason for that was partially an attempt to not be overly verbose and partially parts were already covered, albeit

1509:

is that it has two parts, the first part it meets "used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic" but the second part it does not "its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Nothing about the photo is discussed in the article. No

3947:

Hello. You recently deleted a photo that I added of Mark Lawrence, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. I got the photo from the photo gallery on the media room section of the diocesan website, where a caption describes each photo as "shared publicly." I tried to provide adequate

3619:

I think the Invisalign article is already very close to being GA status. I saw your list of submissions, and I thought about reviewing some of them. My concern is that if I review too many of your articles (either COI review or GA review) without others reviewing, it may look like I'm helping you

2039:

With your comment about what the discussion was about, it was purely a editorial discussion on what editors prefer and why. Both sides correctly used the same policy/guideline to argue their side, so we cannot say one side was more right than the other, just that there was a consensus for one way

575:

Juno 100 robot can be deleted as it's size and angle are not suitable for the article. However I must strongly disagree with you on the issue. If had plastered their email address all over wikipedia as opposed to simply adding it in the permission form, which I did, only then I'd be disrespecting

4392:

Thanks for your latest message explaining more to me about the "pings" and the "Watchlist." Oh, thanks for "pinging" me in that last message to me. (So much easier to know that you wrote!) And, yes, that's how I knew that I had a new message from you earlier today as well. As a result of your

2043:

With your statistics, we are just going to have to disagree. I've had to take many courses on statistics, and rarely are they ever unbiased. This is why scientific and/or trade journals' articles often don't agree with other articles in the same journal. Where is your control group to show what

4396:

When I get a chance, I'll write to an online "friend" of mine who sent me that photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. I'll see if he can tell me any copyright and other necessary info. If so, I'll plan to upload the photo again. Then I plan it as a replacement to the one in the "810th Air Division"

3640:

The community can be paranoid about secret alliances between volunteers and paid editors in order to game the Bright Line or consensus building processes. I share their paranoia. The amount of manipulation that takes place here, especially by paid editors, in order to game the system and push a

2471:

Hey Taylor! In the future can you put new talk page messages at the bottom of the talk page? That's traditionally where people look for new information. When the file was deleted, I could not quickly and easily find a permission statement by searching. I did not go through every pending email,

4239:

Nevertheless, the photo was indeed deleted per my frantic request. Yet, I was sorry to see it go. (My Dad was a SAC bomber pilot, and, we were stationed at Biggs AFB for a while. While at Biggs, Dad flew B-29s, B-50s and B-47s.) But, as I admitted earlier today, I had not yet checked copyright

2455:

Hello, I'd like to request that the file LeAnne_Howe.jpg be undeleted. An appropriate and corrected permissions request has been forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and should be pending review now. In the mean time, I thought I'd put the needed "OTRS pending" to keep the file from being

1107:

for the exact reason that you specify, it could be replaced by a free photo of the actor. It was used in the infobox purely for identification. Any photo could identify the actor. There very well may be certain photos that would identify him more specifically, but it is still replaceable. For

5087:

Only one editor ever worked on the file until it was tagged for speedy deletion as orphaned fair use by another editor. The original uploader then requested it be deleted. And it was only two editors who had edited the article before it was deleted. Since you think it is still useable, I have

3496:

I'm glad that you were able to engage multiple editors while working on your draft. I'm very impressed every time I see your work not only due to quality but how to go about achieving that level of quality. Let me re-read it again tomorrow, and I'll handle the requested edit for you. Cheers,

1899:

of this article title, there was evidence, including yours, on both sides that the article could be considered on either side. Both sides had documented evidence, and you had a fancy table of statistics, which were frankly, and no fault of yours, biased. The only way you could accurately use

1342:

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the

1480:

by inclusion of the photo. Inclusion of the photo negates the necessity of reading about the description of the perpetrator's physical appearance, for example. My understanding is that the image was included in the infobox about the perpetrator; surely that increases understanding about the

1915:

question. The pageview stats I compiled were objective and very clearly relevant to the criteria given in the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline; this is not true of the minimal evidence provided on the other side. In addition, your claim that the pageview stats were "biased" to the point of being

1444:

understand the article about the murder and killer, etc, without seeing the photo of the killer? Yes absolutely. There are many articles about the murder in newspapers and online that do not include a photo at all, and yet the information is understood. I hope that helps clarify. Cheers,

3620:

out. And while I can sleep at night knowing that I wouldn't be doing anything unethical, it still could cause drama that neither you nor I want nor have to deal with. I'll start looking at BabyFirst, but I agree its good to give the opportunity for input before proceeding. Cheers,

218:

While we're asking dumb questions, why didn't you just fix it before it was deleted, instead of complaining now? I don't know what the uploader intended. It was actually completely missing the actual FUR, it doesn't have anything but a web address source and links to two articles.

1857:

of the term "Yesterday". If such a discussion is not about "guideline application", however, then I can't imagine what is. That you evaluated the discussion as being merely "editorial" rather than "policy-backed" indicates to me that you did not apply the standard called for at

1405:

I disagree with your decision to delete this file; you weren't very specific in your reasons for doing so. I believe the image is integral to the encyclopedia; since the subject is dead, no possible replacement is available. I disagree with the nominator's opinion that it fails

1864:

The closer is there to judge the consensus of the community, after discarding irrelevant arguments: those that flatly contradict established policy, those based on personal opinion only, those that are logically fallacious, those that show no understanding of the matter of

351:

This file from March 11 came up in discussion at MCQ recently. It's been around so long, I had to replace the links showing identical photos. While doing that, I noticed that there are also some undecided files for March 10, 12 and 13th. Did I find an "oops"? :) Thanks,

1782:). When I read through the discussion, three times as I do, I felt there was sufficient consensus to close. I also independently read the previous move discussion, and I felt that that discussion had a difference consensus than the close, so I tried to be extra careful. 523:

Listing an email address is not evidence of permission, and is frankly a little disrespectful to the privacy of the copyright holder. You were also given instructions on how to have the copyright holder provide this evidence of permission, which has failed to happen.

1802:" However, as you say, you executed the RFC a mere five days after it was posted. I have difficulty seeing how the discussion had reached a natural conclusion that was "clear"—much less "very obvious"—at the time of your closure. While I don't doubt that you acted 4228:

I admit that I am fairly new to editing or making any "edit requests." And, today was my first try at learning how to upload a photo. Heck, I still get confused as to which "talk" page to use in corresponding or to get replies! (Yours, mine, or someone else's?)

3600:, I've shared a draft on the Talk page just now. Though realistically in most cases these articles are abandoned, I think it is good practice to let a suggested draft stew for a couple weeks in case someone else wants an opportunity to have input. So definitely 4942:

I just got a note from them saying they felt the following sentence: "As of 2014, it has 81 million viewers and is broadcast in 33 countries, in ten languages." would be better off in the "Distribution expansion" section. Wondering if you had an opinion on it.

5318:

Hello there, I noticed you deleted this image stating that it violated "non-free content". Am not sure what you mean, I am the author of the photograph. I gave my permission (stated in the copyright excerpt). For your reference, here is the image you deleted

1952:

I hope that helps give you a little bit of insight into my thought process and my reasoning. If you disagree with the close/move, I'm always open to any uninvoled administrator undoing my actions (with discussion following) or you can take it through the

1993:

I thank you as well - both for the going ahead and closing and for your fair approach. And I am content with your discussion above that you considered the DAB page nuances as well. It will be interesting to see how the statistics work out now. --John

175:

The file was nominated for deletion for the following concern: "Invalid FUR: the header mentions two articles, so it is not clear which one of them the FUR refers to." And it wasn't touched over 7 days or fixed, therefore it was not fully compliant with

2554:

Thanks for the answers to my questions. Neither of them were specifically required to pass the GA review, so I was fine with leaving them be. I can completely understand the plight of trying to find sources in a situation like this, as it is extremely

2472:

though, so it is probably there waiting to be processed. As soon as the email is received and processed, the image will be deleted. I'm currently out of town, but if I get the chance, I will try to go through some emails and get it processed. Cheers,

627:

I can understand if I posted it all over but I wouldn't do that. I'd also hesitate to post private messages even if it's only restricted to the form because somebody has to read the form. Since my best option is correctly filling the form I'll opt for

2879:. We do, however, generally allow for one use of a poster or cover for a video or tv show. This includes cd covers, video game covers, etc. Although, in this case, the article doesn't seem to have any content, and probably is not necessary. Cheers, 1842:. I felt this was an editorial based discussion as opposed to a guideline application or policy-backed discussion. As such, I weighed all of the discussion and everyone's opinions, and came to the conclusion that there was consensus to make the move. 3542:. I wasn't sure if I should pester you about additional articles or not. Some people enjoy dropping into random articles and reviewing someone else's work (like the GA process itself really), while for others it's annoying and may feel burdensome. 2558:

That hook actually is interesting to me, but its only mentioned in passing. I would include more information about this in the article, if you are going to use it as the hook. I'm not so good with DYK hooks, I've only successfully done 2. Cheers,

3401:

Thank you. It's showing up as unused because someone helpfully removed the link after it was deleted - which is how I noticed the deletion. I always prefer to err on the side of caution when it comes to NFC. (Bad experiences in the distant past.)

4397:

article. I've already written to the provider (RuthAS) of the "misplaced" B-50 photo in that article, and, she gave me her blessings in terms of replacing her photo with mine. I hope that I can do so one day. Then a plane from Dad's unit (the

514:

In this instance, you listed the file as non-free, meaning that there was not permission to release the image under a specific license. As a non-free file, it could be replaced by a freely created version of the device (therefore failing

3224:, I'm well and I hope you are too. I've restored the file, but put a deletion tag on it. I saw the pending ticket and I'm not sure that the email address is a good one to accept the copyright from. The logo is from a college in Mexico ( 4334:

trying to learn. I have been trying to do so on my own by reading certain "instructions pages." But, heck, even on the simplest things (to me), there are two or three pages' worth of instructions. (!!) Thus, I usually just give up.

4243:

Rest assured that I will be much more careful in the future. Hopefully, one day I can upload that photo again. I know that I am prejudiced when I say that I think it is a pretty darned-good photo, not to mention its connection to Dad.

3416:

Sorry, I meant it showed up as it was not used in any articles when I deleted it. Looking at the article history it obviously was, but there was nothing on the "What links here" page. Either way, we've got it taken care of. Cheers,

2904:

incompatible and NFCC is a sideshow and a contradiction. I honestly think that those who specialise in images are often making up the rules as they go along, as often also happens with those who specialise in the arcane area that is

526:

Basically, either the copyright holder has not released the file under a free license, in which case we cannot host it, or the copyright holder has, but no one has provided evidence of permission through the proper process. Cheers,

5122:

Hey now, I never said Stefan2 wasn't substantial! He, like you, works in specific niches that requires a specific experience and knowledge. But for real though, I assumed that there was some good reason to remove the image, so I

1127:

as it was not the subject of critical commentary. The exact image/scene would have needed to be discussed in the article with attribution of third-party reliable sources. Even then the image would not be able to be used for

2900:

as I explained on the file talk page. I'm not saying that you are wrong but there is a distinct difference between what you say and what that template says. It really is confusing and it really isn't acceptable. The licence

2532:

BTW, can I pick your brain once more? The bot notice on my talk page mentioned that having been promoted to GA, the article is eligible for DYK. I was thinking of an appropriate hook, but all I can come up with is "...that

4313:

Also, is this related to "Watch this page?" I don't think I've used that feature yet. Perhaps, I should since I have admitted that I have trouble knowing that someone has replied to me, especially when their reply is on

3728:

I just mean we collaborate with some pretty cool people. IRC and I don't get along well. It would be nice if there was another way, through the Foundation, to contact each other. I might have to take you up on that offer.

3963:"Shared publicly" is not the same as release into the public domain. We need evidence that the image is released into the public domain. You could reach out to the Diocese and see if they would follow the directions at 1779: 1438:

which applies to all non-free media. We generally have an unofficial policy that allows for non-free files to be used for identification purposes of deceases individuals, but only when there is a separate article. For

3948:

information about this in my upload. It certainly sounded to me like the photos had been released into the public domain for purposes such as this. Can you help me figure out what I need to do differently? Thanks.

2025:

I'm having a hard time following your discussion because you've intermixed it with mine. Please, in the future, just add your discussion to the bottom so I can follow more easily. That being said. Your argument about

3289: 2914:

I know that I could take it to FFD but while the closed shop persists there really isn't much point. As with the Article Rescue Squadron, you're going to support your own even in the face of logical fallacy. -

3846:

First, it is replaceable. It is an artist's rendition of what the vehicle would look like. Anyone could, with the specs, create their own rendition and release it under a free license. Second, this not how

2676:

Hello, TLSuda. I uploadad an altered version of an image you deleted a couple months ago. I would like you to review the image to make sure it's okay. If you don't think it's okay, feel free to delete it.

4214:

Apparently you received my message regarding my inadvertent uploading of the photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. As soon as I realized my mistake, I notified the folks at "Media Copyright" as soon as possible.

3380:

I restore it. I don't know why it was showing no use (I checked the links). Everything should be good to go. In the future you don't have to ask to undo my actions, I trust you, just let me know. Cheers,

3912:

You have to show evidence of permission where the original copyright holder of the photo (not the subject) who is usually the photographer is releasing the rights under a free license. See the process at

2267: 2938:

the speedy tag I told you is for. I'm not saying it shouldn't be deleted but that I'm just not going to delete it for the wrong reasons or incorrect criteria. Neither should any other administrator. --

1434:

When admins interpret consensus it is not simply a "vote," rather it is an interpretation of consensus based on policy and the validity of the arguments. In this case, we have to follow the policy of

1196:

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's

4914:

The "Non-commercial" part is not free enough for Knowledge. We do not allow any license that have non-commercial or no-derivatives. Basically from Flickr we only allow CC-by-SA & CC-by. Cheers,

4480:

The purpose of adding this image was to create an entry for "Forrest", one of the dogs that acted in the movie. And to convert the corresponding entry in the main page (on the right hand side of

1428: 4310:

When you wrote that you "pinged" me, you said that I will get a notification that you mentioned me. My question: you mentioned me to whom? (A particular discussion group on mutual topics?)

1300: 1032:. If I didn't post that to the correct place, could you please point me in the correct direction? And also, update that guideline to point administrators to the correct listing place? Cheers, 1726:. I presented very carefully documented evidence and reasoning that the article was indeed the primary topic, but nevertheless expressed modest support for the move for reasons unrelated to 433:

So strange that the bot dropped the PUF segment from March 10-13. This looks like it was a good tool--too bad it's gone now and I guess there's nothing to replace it on the near horizon.

2519:

Hi, thanks for your review of this article, it's my first GA :-) As for other GA articles including abstracting and indexing services, there is currently only 1 other GA journal article,

804:

I should've said something sooner, but I was hoping for a response by now. I've requested a response in both English, and through Spanish (using a translator). Thanks for your patience.

1336: 1281: 1258: 1607:

One problem is that I can't see the image, making it hard for me to write a FUR in good faith. Could you point me to a copy of the image (I assume there is one on-line somewhere). Is

1056:

I don't know how that got in the guideline, but I've removed it as it was not good advice. There really is no need to list a moved page manually, since it will appear automatically on

2704:

Ilir Jaçellari (the author of photo) had sent a message in wiki's email permissions-en@wikimedia.org on 3 July 2014. Also i have this picture in my email,which i received from Ilir

4601: 4591: 1285: 1151:

Hi TLSuda! Thank you so much for clearing that up. I fully understand now, and have replaced the image with an original photo. Thanks again for the help, it is much appreciated!

310:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 128:

No license was given, but everything else seems to check out. I requested a license and as soon as that comes in, I'll be happy to restore. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,

3285: 3253:

ah, my bad i've missed the official site and thanks for pointing it out. Anyways, i'm totally agree with you and gonna ask the sender to send it from one of the address listed

1317: 1277: 4304:

Thanks for your message. Yeah, you better believe that I handled the issue of the inadvertent uploading of the B-50 photo quickly. I was in a panic! ("What have I done?!")

3831:

It is not replaceable with a free equivalent. Please do not delete fair-use images that you have not found a free equivalent for. I do not check my wikipedia account daily.--

1221: 410: 2034:. Remember this discussion was for a requested move, which only requires seven. It was open for 24, and only had three comments in the last 3 days. It was time to be closed. 1206: 697:

Well, the FUR was updated with more specific information, therefore meeting the requirements that Knowledge sets for non-free files. So the file meets the requirements of

4728:

I had wondered about that one. I went ahead and deleted it, but if the uploader requests, I will restore that one and a deletion discussion will be necessary. Cheers,

329:

Hi TLSuda. A friend contacted me a while ago about the deletion notice on the image that he uploaded. I am the photographer and will re-upload with a proper license. --

1550: 924:

template without addressing the problem? There is still no separate fair use rationale for each article as the single fair use rationale mentions multiple articles. --

4487:

The "copyright violation" was probably flagged by some automatic software. Please review this and restore the status of the file File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg

4849:

in danger of being removed, simply moved to where they can achieve even more use" - by adding the word not. Apolgies if I've misunderstood and feel free to revert.

2108: 3200:

Hello TLSuda, How have you been? Can you please restore the mentioned file? OTRS confirmed therefore i need to transfer it to the Commons. Thanks you in advance!

1029: 4890:

Hi, I was hoping to get some information on the File:Image of Leslie Benzies.jpg i uploaded recently. I found this image on Flickr with the CC tags: Attribution

3293: 646:

We will have to agree to disagree on posting the email address. Once again, the best and only option is for the copyright holder to follow the instructions at

3093:, specifically under the heading "Instructions for listing files for deletion". Its in a big purple box. If you follow those instructions specifically or use 1410:

for the same reasons stated by the uploader (there is no separate article on the subject); since I can't see the description of the file, I can't dispute the

4605: 2539:

has developed standards for the publication of mouse mutant studies?" which strikes me as a little bit boring. Do you perhaps have a better idea? Thanks! --

3768:

years until someone replaced it with a modern picture. Is it possible to undelete image temporarily at this late date, so I can see the original. Thanks -

3490: 3012: 3560:. Everything looked good there and I left a note/explanation on the talk page. I'd be happy to look at that article/draft too. Just let me know. Cheers, 1945:

As for your compromise, it gained no traction, and hardly was discussed. It was completely different from the underlying discussion of the application of

2419:

Without the deleted images, the table column the top image was in would've shifted. It may not have been perfectly centered, but it would've been okay.

864:

Of course I would not mind. You can always combine sections from NFCR. BTW thank you for your work in clerking ANRFC and keeping it cleaned up. Cheers,

499:

Can I please ask why you deleted it, especially when it was uploaded with the consent of the owners with their contact info provided for confirmation?--

110: 4703: 4443: 1673: 1399: 1025: 3596:

Thanks! Once I finish that last remaining section of the Invisalign article, it will be on the road to being our first GA on a medical product. For

2449: 5271: 4864:

Oh my, thanks! That is absolutely correct, I don't know how I missed such an important word. Thanks for changing it for me, and so quick! Cheers,

3997:, I wonder if that user's continuing campaign against me would have any relevance. If not, fine, I'll just work on developing thicker calluses. ~ 1500: 4473:

The file was deleted because of alleged copyright violation! That makes NO sense. It is a single image from a movie that is 93 minutes long (

1309: 2498:

Hello, you download the ET logo but you have trunckated half of if. The official logo have the ANSYS part. Could you upload the complete image ?

243:, I didn't see any issue with the file. Is it also now policy for you to take this "Ha ha, too late now sucker!" approach? Have you forgotten 4157: 4060:

The draft has been stewing on the Talk page for about a week now and I was wondering if you still had an interest in considering the material.

3884:

May I know the reason to remove the picture from Yatessh M. Acharya page? I've taken a written permission from the artist to use the picture.

3292:. I guess I shoudl ahve looked more thoroughly. In any case, I have updated the existing article to clean it up and bring it up to date. Is 2739:

and downsize it properly without making important parts unusable. Could you please see if it is possible to restore one of its past revisions?

1892:

not directly. I also felt that the closing should be an overall summary, and anyone could look at the discussion for more specific information.

4095:

And it's done. I've left a note on the talk page explaining that its done and why I did it. Let me know if you need anything else. Cheers,

2123: 4618:

Restored. Thanks for letting me know. Since I became an admin, I generally try to do this by default, but it doesn't always happen. Cheers,

4439: 2865:

is for files that have an incompatible license, (generally just not "free" enough) not non-free files. For violations in relation to meeting

1072: 4896:

which was for this purpose. Was the licensing i listed on the image upload incorrect? If not what steps should i take to upload this image?

4608:. However during the discussion the size of the file was reduced, and the original removed from view. Could you restore the original file? 3851:

works. A free equivalent does not have to exist or be found for a file to be deleted. It only has to be able to be created, then it fails

3056: 3000: 1321: 3127: 3120: 1911:

With all due respect, I must strongly disagree with the claim that there was equivalent empirical evidence presented on both sides of the

5321:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Upload?wpDestFile=Image_of_the_HKG%E2%80%93Zhuhai%E2%80%93Macau_Bridge_under_construction,_june_2014.jpg

395:

Thanks! Never had anything at either spot so long that the links "wore out" for them as they did for the Godfather file.:) Thanks again!

251:

here? Are you really claiming that a portrait photo for a biography is either inappropriate, or beyond your skills to provide a FUR for?

5277:

There seems to be a "nowiki" end tag missing here. You should probably fix this yourself so that the signature is expanded correctly. --

3140: 2499: 1112:

is what I first think of when I see Bill Gates, and yet we have to have a free image of him instead. It still identifies him either way.

908: 367:

Good catch. Somehow the bot removed those from pages that are ready to be processed. I've noticed that the bot does that sometimes for

4681:

Thanks! It was a bit backed up. I don't log on as much as I should, but when I do I attempt to knock out the entire backlog. Cheers,

1519:

If you can get the copyright holder of the image to release it under a free license, then this would not even be a situation. Cheers,

4321:

Also, when you said that this is usually the way people find out that there is a discussion, are those discussions dealing with what

4307:

As I'm fairly new to editing (MINOR ones) and "edit requests," please allow me a question. I admit that it sounds a bit paranoid...

3921:. It would have still be deleted as no evidence of permission as we have no proof that the photo was released how you claim. Cheers, 4535: 4276: 3900: 3228:) but the email is from an entertainment group with the closest office being Los Angeles or Las Vegas. Normally, I would be able to 2687: 1346: 1284:. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on 1229: 918: 3035:

I am trying to fix an appointment with Admiral Tahiliani and if possible I will take a photograph of him. Thank you for reviewing.

1916:

inadmissible is demonstrably false. Referring to the data in the table: Even if we were to stipulate for the sake of argument that

103: 4344:

Oh, I'll check the box for "Watch this page." Hopefully that will help me to know that you have replied. (I hope you do.) :-O

1209:) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, 2396:

Well no, because the table needed to be reformatted as a result of the files being deleted. The bot wouldn't have done that. --

1361: 2305:

decision to delete the files, it really shouldn't be left to other editors to fix the mess that you've left in the article. --

4436:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3358: 2301:, could you please "finish the job" by making appropriate edits to the article that now contains several redlinks. As it was 1389: 1375: 682:

with the explanation "Image is being used within policy." Could you please elaborate on how you reached that conclusion? --

4484:) into a hyperlink so users could navigate from there and see the Knowledge entry for "Forrest" that would have this image. 2079:

It seems we will have to agree to disagree about this. Per your suggestion, I have opened a move review, which can be found

1859: 1711: 1608: 993: 1738:

as that editing policy is presently defined. Yet none of this is noted in the discussion summary. ~ Respectfully yours —

5339: 4713:

but it seems I never added it to the mass deletion discussion. Can you delete it or do I need to open a new discussion?

2149: 519:). You were given instructions on your talkpage on 13 June 2014, about how to contest whether or not it was replaceable. 4548:

I went through and closed everything in the backlog except one. That one needs more attention than I can give. Cheers,

1756:

included in the history. Failing that, I hope he will append it to the page. Thanks for contributions both! --John (

982: 4141:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3785:

then I can reply with an attached image. I can also send you a copy of what the description page looked like. Cheers,

1237: 94: 86: 4710: 2612:. But, as it was speedied, and there is still disagreement about such, I've restored it. Being so, I'm pinging both 4137: 2456:

prematurely deleted. Please let me know if there are additional steps I should take to replace this file. Thanks! --

1949:. I did not feel that it added in any way to the discussion's outcome, so I felt no need to include it in the close. 1853:

I agree that most of the discussion up until the time of your closure concerned whether the subject article was the

965:

Can you please provide a link to the talk page discussion that you believe justified the (highly impactful) move of

4146: 3365:

article). I just wanted to check with you to see if there was any reason why I shouldn't restore the file. Thanks.

1663: 81: 69: 64: 59: 38: 1534: 1459: 3362: 2535: 2513: 303: 5025:

that there may have been some inaccuracy or other issue. I'm happy to restore it for you if you want. Cheers,

3690:

Conversation is good. Unfortunately, talk page conversations are limited. And I cant figure out how to use IRC.

2972: 2965: 5227: 3782: 3052: 2996: 1109: 5062:, which does not apply in this case, because several other editors had contributed substantially to this page. 4989: 4980: 1587:

Hey Hobit. If you want to drop the fair-use statement here on my talkpage, I will restore it for you. Cheers,

348: 4799:

I've restored it as is no longer orphaned. I'm happy to handle things like this, but you can also request at

4428:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2140:

so I cannot restore it. The graph could be recreated as a free file. The source for the content comes from

1007: 548: 5113: 5078: 5004: 4995:

Do you happen to know why? (I thought you might, given that you removed the defunct code from the article.)

4497: 2793: 2751: 2503: 2461: 2376:

The removal of the images by the bot would've cleaned it up. But, just for you, I've made it more workable.

1810:

guideline, and did not allow sufficient time for the discussion to develop further consensus organically. —

1327: 1249: 1243:. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round. 1198: 413:) that we could use to prevent this from happening, but that's been broken due to the toolserver/labs move. 3194: 3074:

Hi, you said that the nomination was not set up properly could you please help me to achieve this, cheers.

2709: 2353:

I don't necessarily that there was a valid consensus but, that aside, the table you edited needs fixing. --

1684:

guideline is part of a larger policy. We make deletion decisions based on policy-backed consensus. Cheers,

3176: 3079: 2732: 2719: 2408: 2365: 2317: 2145: 1946: 1912: 1896: 1854: 1835: 1735: 1727: 1719: 334: 315: 307: 296: 256: 209: 165: 150: 4247:

Thanks again for your time and attention. Oh, no reply is needed, OK? (Besides, how would I find it?!)

1806:, it appears to me that the quickness of your closure was greatly in excess of what is called for by the 1304: 4648: 4493: 3896: 3269: 3212: 3135: 2683: 2657: 2591: 2521: 2457: 2080: 1954: 1659: 1492: 1420: 1345:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from

1296: 751:

I noticed that you have now removed this information from the FUR. On what basis have you deduced that

599:). If someone else owns the copyright to the image, they have to submit this statement of permission to 477:

Bots may never sleep but it looks like they take a nap from time to time. :) Thanks for the barnstar!!!

5205: 3967:

or by including a statement on their website that the file is released into the public domain. Cheers,

482: 438: 400: 357: 240: 2705: 5327: 4948: 4667: 4414: 4351: 4257: 4065: 4041: 4002: 3888: 3719: 3681: 3646: 3609: 3547: 3529: 3471: 2670: 2544: 2330: 1982: 1225: 4477:). Similar images from the movie have been used in blogs and reviews of this movie elsewhere. 3949: 3917:. The file was tagged as non-free so it was deleted because it could be replaced, therefore failing 2228:

and you'd have to get permission from the author Thomas J. Hayes. That permission could be sent via

1152: 1089: 1030:

Knowledge:Requested_moves/Closing_instructions#Moves_of_disambiguation_pages_to_primary_topic_titles

5163: 4845:

I've just amended your comment by adding one word which is what I think you meant "Your photos are

3953: 3407: 3370: 3173:

This is for all of the hard work you do, especially deleting files! Your work is much appreciated!

3036: 2980: 1355: 1156: 1093: 790:

Okay, I just didn't know that was going on behind the scenes. Thanks for reaching out to them. --

244: 3361:

as unused non-free media. However it was in use (I restored the older, non-copyvio history of the

478: 434: 396: 353: 5109: 5074: 5016: 5000: 4828: 4779: 3836: 2789: 2788:

Thanks. I am done. You can delete the whole JPEG image now. It is orphaned anyway. Best regards,

2763: 2747: 1383: 1369: 1332: 1254: 633: 581: 504: 4401:

Bomb Wing, one of two wings in the division) will be properly displayed in the 810th's article.

4338:

Well, thanks again for your time. Please write back when you get a chance. Thanks in advance!

4327:

have been writing about? Such as, this article or that article? Or, this photo or that photo?

2698: 2279: 5021:

The editor who uploaded the file requested that it be deleted. I wasn't really sure why, but I

3714:. The "Email this user" feature is activated on my account if you want to contact me off-wiki. 2274:? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at 1734:

as a redirect to the moved article, in respect of the strong empirical evidence that it is the

1068: 978: 5282: 5088:

restored it, but if there are any issues with it, let me know and I can re-delete it. Cheers,

4904: 4459: 4165: 3964: 3914: 3773: 3094: 3075: 2768:

I've restored the larger version. Let me know when you resize and I will re-delete. Cheers,

2397: 2354: 2306: 2271: 2229: 2215: 2177: 2119: 2090: 1928: 1874: 1817: 1745: 1681: 1677: 1557: 1482: 1400:

Knowledge:Files for deletion/2014 June 16#File:Elliot Rodger Screenshot From Youtube Video.jpg

1262: 1182: 1003: 929: 647: 596: 330: 311: 252: 205: 161: 5108:

I see. You are right. Stefan2 and LegoBot do not count as substantial. Thanks. Best regards,

2225: 2141: 5335: 5303: 5258: 5244: 5213: 5189: 5139: 5099: 5036: 4969: 4925: 4875: 4814: 4800: 4753: 4739: 4718: 4692: 4629: 4559: 4519: 4379: 4290: 4196: 4106: 4086: 4027: 3978: 3932: 3892: 3866: 3816: 3796: 3740: 3711: 3701: 3667: 3631: 3601: 3571: 3508: 3428: 3392: 3326: 3258: 3244: 3221: 3201: 3108: 3026: 2950: 2920: 2890: 2841: 2813: 2779: 2678: 2653: 2643: 2603: 2587: 2570: 2483: 2430: 2387: 2344: 2243: 2201: 2163: 2059: 1968: 1695: 1639: 1598: 1530: 1487: 1455: 1415: 1142: 1043: 950: 875: 854:

Would you mind if I combined the three NFCR request on ANRFC into a single section? Cheers,

829: 815: 795: 781: 760: 742: 720: 687: 661: 614: 562: 538: 459: 424: 386: 276: 230: 191: 139: 47: 17: 4012:

I don't see any "campaign" against you. I think you just need to listen to what is said at

1224:) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance 4944: 4854: 4662: 4410: 4363: 4347: 4269: 4253: 4061: 4037: 3998: 3715: 3677: 3642: 3605: 3543: 3525: 3483: 3467: 2540: 2283: 2027: 1978: 1807: 1794: 1775: 1615: 1577: 247:

completely and are now too busy in explaining your infallibility to consider that there's

118: 4225:

Apparently, you are the person who actually deleted my inadvertent uploading. Thank you.

4075:

Absolutely. I'll take another look at your draft and then probably move it soon. Cheers,

2190:

and cannot be uploaded. If you get a new, free version created, that could be uploaded.

156:

Could you please explain why you've just deleted this. It had a valid NFC claim for the

3918: 3852: 3848: 3710:

Not sure what you mean, but the Knowledge help channel IRC can be accessed by clicking

3403: 3366: 3340: 3305: 2976: 2873: 2866: 2859: 2609: 2608:

I disagree that the image isn't replaceable. I also don't think that the image passes

2275: 2187: 2137: 1506: 1465: 1440: 1435: 1411: 1407: 1351: 1313: 1273: 1174: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1104: 970: 730: 698: 600: 516: 448:

in place. I believe you'd be hard pressed to find another issue like that since April.

177: 1059:

within 12-24 hours, unless all the links have been fixed in the meantime (as those to

5233:

I don't currently have access to SVG editing programs to change the scaling. Cheers,

5124: 5059: 5022: 4958:

I don't truly have an opinion, but it does seem like a good place to put it. Cheers,

4894: 4891: 4824: 4775: 4748:

Thank you. If it reappears snd it still serves no purpose I'll start the discussion.

4609: 4579: 4539: 4450:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4013: 3832: 3229: 3090: 2629: 2615: 2031: 1999: 1803: 1761: 1515: 1379: 1365: 1217: 896: 855: 702: 629: 577: 500: 372: 368: 5278: 4900: 4771: 4770:

Could you please restore this image? It looks like it was removed from the article

4455: 4451: 4161: 4142: 3769: 3297: 2623: 2529:

them (as opposed to articles that appeared in them, but that's a different thing).

2211: 2173: 2131: 2115: 2085: 2020: 1923: 1869: 1812: 1740: 1730:; I also presented a compromise proposal to effect the proposed move while leaving 1553: 1202: 1178: 1115:

The second thing to note is every non-free file has to meet ALL of the criteria of

1064: 1019: 998: 989: 974: 925: 157: 1551:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_topic_ban_for_Andy_Dingley

265:

It is my policy to respond in the same manner as I am approached. Fire with fire.

1625: 5331: 5307: 5295: 5286: 5262: 5254: 5248: 5236: 5217: 5209: 5193: 5181: 5172: 5143: 5131: 5117: 5103: 5091: 5082: 5040: 5028: 5008: 4973: 4961: 4952: 4929: 4917: 4908: 4879: 4867: 4858: 4832: 4818: 4806: 4783: 4757: 4749: 4743: 4731: 4722: 4714: 4696: 4684: 4672: 4633: 4621: 4612: 4582: 4563: 4551: 4542: 4523: 4511: 4501: 4463: 4433: 4418: 4383: 4371: 4355: 4294: 4282: 4261: 4200: 4188: 4169: 4110: 4098: 4090: 4078: 4069: 4045: 4031: 4019: 4006: 3982: 3970: 3957: 3936: 3924: 3904: 3870: 3858: 3840: 3820: 3808: 3800: 3788: 3775: 3744: 3732: 3723: 3705: 3693: 3685: 3671: 3659: 3650: 3635: 3623: 3613: 3575: 3563: 3551: 3533: 3512: 3500: 3475: 3450: 3432: 3420: 3411: 3396: 3384: 3374: 3344: 3330: 3318: 3309: 3271: 3248: 3236: 3214: 3185: 3144: 3126:

Hello TLSuda. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

3112: 3100: 3083: 3060: 3030: 3018: 3004: 2954: 2924: 2916: 2894: 2882: 2852: 2845: 2837: 2817: 2805: 2797: 2783: 2771: 2755: 2713: 2692: 2661: 2647: 2635: 2595: 2574: 2562: 2548: 2507: 2487: 2475: 2465: 2434: 2422: 2414: 2391: 2379: 2371: 2348: 2336: 2323: 2287: 2247: 2235: 2219: 2205: 2193: 2181: 2167: 2155: 2094: 2074: 2063: 2051: 2003: 1986: 1972: 1960: 1932: 1878: 1821: 1765: 1749: 1699: 1687: 1667: 1643: 1631: 1619: 1602: 1590: 1581: 1561: 1522: 1511: 1447: 1393: 1186: 1160: 1146: 1134: 1097: 1047: 1035: 954: 942: 933: 899: 879: 867: 858: 833: 825: 819: 807: 799: 791: 785: 773: 764: 756: 746: 738: 724: 712: 691: 683: 665: 653: 637: 618: 606: 585: 566: 554: 542: 530: 508: 486: 463: 451: 442: 428: 416: 404: 390: 378: 361: 338: 319: 280: 268: 260: 234: 222: 213: 195: 183: 169: 143: 131: 122: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1265:

to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to

4850: 3557: 3458: 3443: 2298: 2109:

File:US Senators' Responsiveness to Income Groups (107th-111th Congresses).png

2103:

File:US Senators' Responsiveness to Income Groups (107th-111th Congresses).png

1611: 1573: 114: 4236:

Golly, if someone writes to me, how am I to know without a lot of “digging?”

2333:

that will come behind to clean it up. You don't have to do anything. Cheers,

1228:. Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles 4936: 4429: 4054: 3597: 3590: 3539: 3336: 3301: 3158: 1839: 1731: 1715: 1060: 966: 3315:

Probably not, but I've deleted it regardless. Thanks for the note. Cheers,

3130:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 2102: 5272:

Knowledge:Files for upload/January 2015#John Dolan and George the dog.jpeg

4893:

which i gave a link to the original source in the upload and NonCommercial

4481: 4474: 4404:

Well, I guess that's it for now. Thanks again for your time. Take care.

679: 4704:

Knowledge:Files for deletion/2014 July 28#File:LEROYTHORPE00000000018.jpg

4538:

is getting quite large. It would be nice if you could take a look at it.

4393:

latest message, I now have a better understanding. Thanks for the info!

3294:

Draft:List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus

3280:

Draft:List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus

2172:

If I use it in a current version of an article, then can you restore it?

1995: 1757: 1212: 706: 4709:

Thanks for taking care of that mess, but I think I missed one. I tagged

3604:. Besides, the GAN queue is already overwhelmed with my submissions ;-) 4279:. Its a bit cheesy, but it does teach you some of the basics. Cheers, 2736: 1977:

Thanks for taking the trouble to close this difficult move discussion.

1658:

Why did you delete the image of Charmcaster. I was not given a reason.

1268: 5162:

Have a look at your Commons talk as soon as you get a chance. Thanks.

3013:

Knowledge:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_July_9#File:Admiral_Tahiliani.jpg

2148:

to create you one if you can't or you could reach out to whomever did

3454: 1486:

for a deletion review, however, so your decision will stand. Thanks!—

5206:

https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Football_Federation_Australia_logo.svg

4992:

has suddenly vanished from its article and its seems it is deleted.

1793:

The first of the three primary guidelines that appear at the top of

3290:

List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus

3462: 3254: 3225: 2210:

Is there any way that permission can be obtained from the author?

1291: 239:

When I last saw this image, when the lynch mob was gathering over

1057: 5320: 2735:

is badly downsized. If I had a larger version, I could crop out

1549:

You have been involved in this issue so I think you should see

1834:

The root discussion was primarily about the interpretation of

1674:

Knowledge:Files_for_deletion/2014_June_24#File:Charmcaster.png

25: 3233:

are absolutely positive about the copyright release. Cheers,

2450:

Knowledge:Files for deletion/2014 July 7#File:LeAnne_Howe.jpg

1714:

a few hours ago, with the conclusion to effect the move from

1680:. Your argument had no bearing on the discussion because the 4124: 3453:

where I have a COI and closed out an image issue related to

4508:

cannot host the file due to its copyright status. Cheers,

3449:

Your name was top of mind because you did the GA review on

939:

Mainly because I wasn't paying attention. It is done now.

2329:

Consensus determined that, I just implemented. There's a

1778:

a request was made for closure of the move (now archived

4598: 4432:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4222:

to upload a photo. Well, I guess I learned "too well!"

3994: 2833: 2297:

Since you've chosen to delete images that were used in

2112: 1246:

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with

493: 4602:

File:East Wind Over Weehawken, Edward Hopper 1934.tiff

4592:

File:East Wind Over Weehawken, Edward Hopper 1934.tiff

4156:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

4119:

Orphaned non-free image File:WAFC True Oldies Logo.png

2836:. Did my note on the file talk page not make sense? - 1712:

Talk:Yesterday (Beatles song)#Move request (June 2014)

994:

Talk:Yesterday (Beatles song)#Move request (June 2014)

2855:. There were a few things wrong with the nomination. 1481:

perpetrator? I think this might be an instance where

3286:

List of Ministers of Education and Culture of Cyprus

2628:, so one or the other can take the file through the 2278:. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! 1706:

Requested move: Yesterday → Yesterday (Beatles song)

1083:

Deletion of As Ira in Romancing the Stone (1984).jpg

755:

does not actually claim authorship or copyright? --

547:

Side note: The same process is about to happen with

2869:(what the copyright tag alludes to), you would use 2048:time, though, I'm confident in my closing. Cheers, 1860:

WP:Closing discussions#How to determine the outcome

1710:Greetings. I see that you closed the discussion of 1464:Thank you for the clarification. I still feel that 411:

Knowledge:Database_reports/Old_deletion_discussions

3011:I did delete it yes. The deletion nomination was: 409:We used to have a great database report resource ( 4330:I hope that you don't mind my questions. But, I 2030:having discussions up for thirty days applies to 4661:I see have been very active on OTRS. Great job. 3457:, where I also have a COI. I also have a COI on 1303:), a good article on the noted Czech footballer 109:There is a ticket concerning image you deleted: 4469:Deletion of File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg 1026:Knowledge:Disambiguation pages with links#To do 5128:to Knowledge's mission like you are. Cheers, 5058:The author request for deletion reminds me of 4482:https://en.wikipedia.org/Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale 4475:https://en.wikipedia.org/Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale 4152:Note that any non-free images not used in any 1514:, to have a separate article. With respect to 4424:Disambiguation link notification for August 2 2975:I would like to know, have your reviewed the 2581:File:Jeff Dexter promoting The Twist 1962.jpg 8: 4207:Thanks! (The Photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB) 1131:I hope that clears things up a bit. Cheers, 737:claims the image, contradicting the FUR. -- 104:File:Ernest Hartsock, undated photograph.jpg 3491:File:Invisalign software user interface.png 3097:, that is all that you need to do. Cheers, 2728:Hope I am not catching you in a busy time. 1472:without the photo, but that understanding 1175:Knowledge:NFCR#File:Disney_Junior_Logo.png 1016:Thanks Jaydiem for posting the link. Also 678:You closed the non-free content review of 5178:Just saw it and responded. Thanks again! 3156: 1324:, freely released due to the efforts of 5200:File: Football Federation Australia logo 4218:As you know, I was just trying to learn 371:. May be time to change to the bot that 5292:Thanks for fixing that for me. Cheers, 3556:I just processed the requested edit at 3359:File:World Resources Institute logo.jpg 1028:, which I made per the instructions at 973:, and I don't where to look for it. -- 3676:No problem, just making conversation. 705:and United States Copyright law under 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3538:Hey, I have another one coming up on 375:uses. I'll look at them now. Cheers, 7: 1895:When it comes to the application of 1322:a now-featured video game screenshot 992:: You can find the discussion here: 753:El Sol de México Monterrey Newspaper 735:El Sol de México Monterrey Newspaper 5323:James 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC) 5208:be reduced in resolution as well? 4604:from a non-free file to a free per 3089:There are explicit instructions at 2152:(similar file). Good luck, Cheers, 1103:Hey Matzohboy. The image does fail 909:File:Bleed It Out - Linkin Park.ogg 1468:is too rigid; yes, the article is 24: 4655:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 4277:Knowledge:The Knowledge Adventure 3288:exists. I created a redirect at 3128:Constantin Brâncoveanu University 3121:Constantin Brâncoveanu University 2144:. You could get someone from the 1347:Knowledge:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send 4886:File:Image of Leslie Benzies.jpg 4790: 4647: 4569: 4176: 3855:and then we delete it. Cheers, 3157: 2586:you undelete it please? Thanks. 1326: 1308: 1290: 1267: 1248: 1211: 1197: 1119:. In this case the image failed 886: 29: 4823:Will do. Thanks for your help. 4711:File:LEROYTHORPE00000000018.jpg 4138:File:WAFC True Oldies Logo.png 3353:World Resources Institute logo 1286:Maya Angelou's autobiographies 1282:2013 Atlantic hurricane season 1: 5314:Hong Kong Macau Zhuhai Bridge 4147:our policy for non-free media 3132:A7 does not apply to schools. 2266:Hi! Would you care to review 4158:criteria for speedy deletion 3781:If you send me an email via 2150:File:Senate_Income_Votes.SVG 1192:WikiCup 2014 June newsletter 5308:16:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 5287:13:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 5263:04:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 5249:11:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 5218:03:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 5194:01:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 5173:00:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 5144:18:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 5118:18:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 5104:18:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 5083:15:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 5041:12:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 5009:10:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 4578:very much for your effort. 3493:after the changes are done? 3357:I noticed that you deleted 1024:, you undid my addition to 5358: 5223:Sure, you can just tag it 5049:Yes, please do restore it. 4974:18:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4953:18:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4930:17:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4909:16:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4880:12:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4859:11:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 4833:17:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4819:11:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4784:06:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4758:16:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4744:11:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4723:03:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 4697:15:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 4673:14:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 4634:11:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 4613:10:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 4583:14:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 4564:14:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 4543:07:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 4524:14:48, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 4502:14:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 4464:09:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 4419:02:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 4384:22:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4356:19:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4295:10:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4262:01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4201:17:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4170:13:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 4111:11:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 3461:and have prepared a draft 3119:Speedy deletion declined: 2973:File:Admiral Tahiliani.jpg 2971:You recently deleted file 2966:File:Admiral Tahiliani.jpg 302:An editor has asked for a 4646: 4125: 4091:19:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 4070:19:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 4046:19:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 4032:23:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 4007:23:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 3983:14:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 3958:14:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 3937:11:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 3905:09:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 3871:19:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3841:19:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3821:14:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC) 3801:12:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC) 3776:00:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC) 3745:16:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3724:16:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3706:15:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3686:15:32, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3672:14:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3651:13:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3636:10:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3614:04:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3576:02:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3552:01:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3534:03:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 3513:01:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 3476:23:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 3433:10:32, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3412:04:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 3397:19:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 3375:19:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 3363:World Resources Institute 3345:11:50, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 3331:11:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 3310:04:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 3272:17:39, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 3249:15:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 3215:11:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 3186:21:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3163: 3145:20:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3113:14:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3084:13:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3061:13:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3031:13:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 3005:07:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC) 2955:19:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2925:19:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2895:17:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2846:15:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 2818:18:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2798:17:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2784:17:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2756:14:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2714:10:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 2693:02:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 2662:22:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 2648:22:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 2596:21:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 2575:15:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC) 2549:15:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC) 2536:Genes, Brain and Behavior 2514:Genes, Brain and Behavior 2508:09:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 2494:Esterel Technologies Logo 2488:03:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 2004:23:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1987:21:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1973:18:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1766:18:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1750:17:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1460:13:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 1429:02:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 1394:18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 1187:14:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC) 1161:23:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1147:01:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 1123:(as discussed above, and 1098:01:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 1073:19:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1048:18:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 1008:17:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 983:17:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 955:15:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 934:15:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 900:14:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 880:14:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 859:14:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 834:10:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC) 820:13:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 800:06:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 786:00:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 765:03:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC) 747:03:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 725:03:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 692:03:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 666:00:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 650:. Cheers, and good luck. 638:17:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC) 619:21:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 586:17:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 567:23:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 543:23:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 509:18:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 487:21:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 464:21:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 443:21:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 429:20:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 405:20:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 391:20:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 362:20:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 339:20:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 320:01:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 281:01:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 261:00:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 235:00:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 214:00:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 196:00:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 170:00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 144:10:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 123:08:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 4990:File:ARCserveManager.JPG 4981:File:ARCserveManager.JPG 4774:for no apparent reason. 3783:Special:EmailUser/TLSuda 2466:19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC) 2435:18:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2415:18:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2392:17:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2372:17:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2349:17:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2324:16:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2288:08:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 2248:22:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC) 2220:04:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 2206:17:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 2182:02:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 2168:00:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 2124:14:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 2095:00:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 2064:22:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1933:16:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1879:15:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1822:15:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1700:22:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 1668:22:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 1654:Deleting charmcaster.png 1644:17:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1620:12:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1603:00:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1582:17:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1562:15:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 1535:22:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1501:20:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 919:di-missing article links 349:File:Godfather stars.jpg 325:Deletion of Bacone15.jpg 200:So why not do something 113:. Could you look at it? 4185:Taken care of. Cheers, 2832:Hi, I don't understand 2224:The original source is 1478:significantly increased 914:Why did you remove the 549:File:Juno 100 robot.jpg 204:and fix the paperwork? 111:ticket:2014060710004722 4130: 3943:Mark Lawrence (bishop) 3827:ISROorbitalvehicle.jpg 733:because, per the FUR, 5253:Will do. Thanks! -- 4135:Thanks for uploading 4128: 3763:StereocardCarabao.jpg 3195:File:Fermattalogo.jpg 2522:The Accounting Review 2262:Soliciting comment... 2136:The graph would fail 1955:Knowledge:Move review 1173:Can you please close 1110:this photo (non-free) 1108:instance, in my mind 680:File:Doctor Balli.jpg 674:File:Doctor Balli.jpg 42:of past discussions. 4606:this NFCR discussion 4452:opt-out instructions 3167:The Admin's Barnstar 2733:File:Googlelabel.JPG 2720:File:Googlelabel.JPG 2671:File:CasinoCards.jpg 2107:Hi, I'd like to use 1572:next day or three. 1226:Grus (constellation) 308:File:Fredcopeman.jpg 297:File:Fredcopeman.jpg 295:Deletion review for 151:File:Fredcopeman.jpg 4640:A barnstar for you! 4301:Hi, TL (if I may), 3150:A Barnstar for you! 2742:Thanks in advance. 2725:Hi. How do you do? 1676:. The image fails 1238:Russian battleship 1230:Russian battleship 4442:• Join us at the 4131: 3877:Yateesh M. Acharya 3284:Hi. I found that 2083:. Best regards, — 707:fair-use doctrines 5344: 5330:comment added by 4678: 4677: 4447: 4143:claim of fair use 3908: 3891:comment added by 3805:Already replied. 3191: 3190: 3179:Corkythehornetfan 2948: 2691: 2632:process. Cheers, 2272:Of Human Feelings 1957:process. Cheers, 1862:, which states: " 1350: 1263:Portal:Literature 492:Your deletion of 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5349: 5343: 5324: 5298: 5239: 5232: 5226: 5184: 5170: 5169: 5134: 5094: 5031: 5020: 4964: 4920: 4870: 4809: 4798: 4794: 4793: 4734: 4687: 4670: 4665: 4651: 4644: 4643: 4624: 4597:In February you 4577: 4573: 4572: 4554: 4514: 4437: 4374: 4367: 4285: 4273: 4191: 4184: 4180: 4179: 4133: 4127: 4101: 4081: 4022: 3973: 3927: 3907: 3885: 3861: 3811: 3791: 3735: 3696: 3662: 3626: 3566: 3503: 3487: 3423: 3387: 3321: 3267: 3266: 3239: 3210: 3209: 3181: 3161: 3154: 3153: 3103: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3039: 3021: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2946: 2945: 2885: 2878: 2872: 2864: 2858: 2828:CSD and non-free 2808: 2774: 2767: 2681: 2638: 2627: 2619: 2607: 2565: 2478: 2425: 2404: 2401: 2382: 2361: 2358: 2339: 2313: 2310: 2270:for the article 2268:my FA nomination 2238: 2196: 2158: 2135: 2078: 2054: 2024: 1963: 1690: 1660:PointsofNoReturn 1634: 1593: 1525: 1505:The thing about 1498: 1490: 1476:, in my opinion 1450: 1426: 1418: 1344: 1331: 1330: 1312: 1297:Figureskatingfan 1295: 1294: 1272: 1271: 1253: 1252: 1216: 1215: 1201: 1137: 1038: 1023: 945: 923: 917: 894: 890: 889: 870: 810: 776: 715: 656: 630:Nadirali نادرالی 609: 578:Nadirali نادرالی 557: 533: 501:Nadirali نادرالی 454: 419: 381: 271: 225: 186: 134: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:TLSuda 5357: 5356: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5348: 5347: 5346: 5325: 5316: 5296: 5275: 5237: 5230: 5228:non-free reduce 5224: 5202: 5182: 5165: 5164: 5160: 5132: 5092: 5029: 5014: 4984: 4962: 4940: 4918: 4888: 4868: 4843: 4807: 4791: 4789: 4768: 4732: 4707: 4685: 4668: 4663: 4642: 4622: 4595: 4570: 4568: 4552: 4532: 4512: 4471: 4444:DPL WikiProject 4426: 4372: 4361: 4283: 4267: 4250:Sincerely, Rob 4209: 4189: 4177: 4175: 4122: 4121: 4099: 4079: 4058: 4038:J. Johnson (JJ) 4020: 3999:J. Johnson (JJ) 3991: 3971: 3945: 3925: 3886: 3879: 3859: 3829: 3809: 3789: 3765: 3733: 3694: 3660: 3624: 3594: 3564: 3501: 3481: 3447: 3421: 3385: 3355: 3319: 3282: 3260: 3259: 3237: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3180: 3177: 3152: 3143: 3124: 3101: 3072: 3046: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3019: 2990: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2969: 2939: 2905:categorisation. 2883: 2876: 2870: 2862: 2856: 2830: 2806: 2772: 2761: 2723: 2702: 2699:Halil Jaçellari 2674: 2636: 2621: 2613: 2601: 2583: 2563: 2517: 2496: 2476: 2453: 2423: 2411: 2402: 2399: 2380: 2368: 2359: 2356: 2337: 2320: 2311: 2308: 2295: 2264: 2236: 2194: 2156: 2146:WP:Graphics Lab 2129: 2105: 2072: 2052: 2040:over the other. 2018: 1961: 1947:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1913:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1897:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1855:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1838:in relation to 1836:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1736:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1728:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1720:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1708: 1688: 1656: 1632: 1591: 1569: 1567:Fredcopeman.jpg 1547: 1523: 1493: 1488: 1448: 1421: 1416: 1403: 1325: 1289: 1266: 1247: 1210: 1194: 1171: 1135: 1128:identification. 1085: 1036: 1017: 969:? It is not on 963: 943: 921: 915: 912: 887: 885: 868: 852: 824:No worries. -- 808: 774: 713: 676: 654: 607: 555: 531: 497: 452: 417: 379: 346: 327: 304:deletion review 300: 269: 249:an encyclopedia 223: 184: 154: 132: 107: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5355: 5353: 5315: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5274: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5201: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5159: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5072: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5044: 5043: 4999: 4983: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4939: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4887: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4842: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4767: 4766:File:Leeds.png 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4706: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4676: 4675: 4658: 4657: 4652: 4641: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4594: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4531: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4470: 4467: 4425: 4422: 4387: 4386: 4300: 4298: 4297: 4208: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4120: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4057: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 3990: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3944: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3878: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3803: 3764: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3593: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3516: 3515: 3494: 3446: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3354: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3281: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3197: 3192: 3189: 3188: 3178: 3170: 3169: 3164: 3162: 3151: 3148: 3139: 3134:Thank you. — 3123: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 2968: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2829: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2802:Done! Cheers, 2746: 2722: 2717: 2701: 2696: 2673: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2582: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2556: 2516: 2511: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2452: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2409: 2366: 2318: 2294: 2291: 2263: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2067: 2066: 2045: 2041: 2036: 2035: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1950: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1893: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1774:5 days ago at 1769: 1768: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1568: 1565: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1470:understandable 1402: 1397: 1193: 1190: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1129: 1113: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1063:have been). -- 1051: 1050: 1011: 1010: 971:Talk:Yesterday 962: 959: 958: 957: 911: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 749: 675: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 641: 640: 624: 623: 622: 621: 589: 588: 572: 571: 570: 569: 524: 520: 496: 490: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 345: 342: 326: 323: 299: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 153: 148: 147: 146: 106: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5354: 5345: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5322: 5313: 5309: 5305: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5273: 5270: 5264: 5260: 5256: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5246: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5229: 5222: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5199: 5195: 5191: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5171: 5168: 5157: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5126: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5110:Codename Lisa 5107: 5106: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5075:Codename Lisa 5073: 5071:Best regards, 5070: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5061: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5048: 5047: 5046: 5045: 5042: 5038: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5024: 5018: 5017:Codename Lisa 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5006: 5002: 5001:Codename Lisa 4998:Best regards, 4996: 4993: 4991: 4987: 4982: 4979: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4938: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4910: 4906: 4902: 4897: 4895: 4892: 4885: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4840: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4802: 4797: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4765: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4741: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4705: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4680: 4679: 4674: 4671: 4666: 4660: 4659: 4656: 4653: 4650: 4645: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4600: 4593: 4590: 4584: 4581: 4576: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4541: 4537: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4494:Sudhindranath 4491: 4488: 4485: 4483: 4478: 4476: 4468: 4466: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4448: 4445: 4441: 4435: 4431: 4423: 4421: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4408: 4405: 4402: 4400: 4394: 4390: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4365: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4342: 4339: 4336: 4333: 4328: 4326: 4325: 4319: 4318:"talk" page. 4317: 4311: 4308: 4305: 4302: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4278: 4271: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4248: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4223: 4221: 4216: 4212: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4183: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4160:. Thank you. 4159: 4155: 4150: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4139: 4132: 4118: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4056: 4053: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4036:Thank you. ~ 4035: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4015: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3966: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3920: 3916: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3882: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3854: 3850: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3804: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3774: 3771: 3762: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3592: 3589: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3495: 3492: 3485: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3466:appreciated. 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3445: 3442: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3352: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3300:? Thanks. - 3299: 3296:eligible for 3295: 3291: 3287: 3279: 3273: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3264: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3231: 3227: 3226:their website 3223: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3196: 3193: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3172: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3160: 3155: 3149: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3137: 3136:Malik Shabazz 3133: 3129: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3069: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3049: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2993: 2978: 2974: 2967: 2964: 2956: 2952: 2944: 2943: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2875: 2868: 2861: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2827: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2790:Codename Lisa 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2765: 2764:Codename Lisa 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2748:Codename Lisa 2745:Best regards, 2743: 2740: 2738: 2734: 2729: 2726: 2721: 2718: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2700: 2697: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2672: 2669: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2631: 2625: 2617: 2611: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2530: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500:213.30.139.86 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2458:Taylorjhodges 2451: 2448: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2406: 2405: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2363: 2362: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2315: 2314: 2304: 2300: 2292: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2261: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2189: 2186:No. It fails 2185: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2133: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2076: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2022: 2017: 2016: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1956: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1925: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1805: 1804:in good faith 1801: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1653: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1544: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1491: 1484: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1419: 1413: 1409: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1333:Sven Manguard 1329: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1306: 1305:Tomáš Rosický 1302: 1298: 1293: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1270: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255:Sven Manguard 1251: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1235: 1233: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1191: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1168: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1111: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1082: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1031: 1027: 1021: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 960: 956: 952: 948: 947: 946: 938: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 920: 910: 907: 901: 898: 893: 883: 882: 881: 877: 873: 872: 871: 863: 862: 861: 860: 857: 850:NFCR at ANRFC 849: 835: 831: 827: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 812: 811: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 778: 777: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 717: 716: 708: 704: 700: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 673: 667: 663: 659: 658: 657: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 639: 635: 631: 626: 625: 620: 616: 612: 611: 610: 602: 598: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 583: 579: 574: 573: 568: 564: 560: 559: 558: 550: 546: 545: 544: 540: 536: 535: 534: 525: 521: 518: 513: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 495: 491: 489: 488: 484: 480: 465: 461: 457: 456: 455: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 421: 420: 412: 408: 407: 406: 402: 398: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 383: 382: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 359: 355: 350: 343: 341: 340: 336: 332: 324: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 298: 294: 282: 278: 274: 273: 272: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 227: 226: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 188: 187: 179: 174: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 159: 152: 149: 145: 141: 137: 136: 135: 127: 126: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 105: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5326:— Preceding 5317: 5294: 5293: 5276: 5235: 5234: 5203: 5180: 5179: 5166: 5161: 5158:Commons talk 5130: 5129: 5090: 5089: 5027: 5026: 4997: 4994: 4988: 4985: 4960: 4959: 4941: 4916: 4915: 4898: 4889: 4866: 4865: 4846: 4844: 4805: 4804: 4795: 4772:Leeds Rhinos 4769: 4730: 4729: 4708: 4683: 4682: 4654: 4620: 4619: 4596: 4574: 4550: 4549: 4533: 4510: 4509: 4492: 4489: 4486: 4479: 4472: 4449: 4427: 4409: 4406: 4403: 4398: 4395: 4391: 4388: 4370: 4369: 4346: 4343: 4340: 4337: 4331: 4329: 4323: 4322: 4320: 4315: 4312: 4309: 4306: 4303: 4299: 4281: 4280: 4252: 4249: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4235: 4233:talk page.) 4231: 4227: 4224: 4219: 4217: 4213: 4211:Hi, TLSuda, 4210: 4187: 4186: 4181: 4153: 4151: 4136: 4134: 4123: 4097: 4096: 4077: 4076: 4059: 4018: 4017: 3995:this warning 3992: 3969: 3968: 3946: 3923: 3922: 3887:— Preceding 3883: 3880: 3857: 3856: 3830: 3807: 3806: 3787: 3786: 3766: 3731: 3730: 3692: 3691: 3658: 3657: 3622: 3621: 3595: 3562: 3561: 3499: 3498: 3448: 3419: 3418: 3383: 3382: 3356: 3317: 3316: 3283: 3262: 3261: 3257::) Regards! 3235: 3234: 3205: 3204: 3199: 3175: 3174: 3166: 3131: 3125: 3099: 3098: 3076:Lukejordan02 3073: 3050: 3017: 3016: 2994: 2970: 2941: 2940: 2901: 2881: 2880: 2831: 2804: 2803: 2770: 2769: 2744: 2741: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2703: 2675: 2634: 2633: 2584: 2561: 2560: 2534: 2531: 2526: 2520: 2518: 2497: 2474: 2473: 2454: 2421: 2420: 2398: 2378: 2377: 2355: 2335: 2334: 2307: 2302: 2296: 2265: 2234: 2233: 2192: 2191: 2154: 2153: 2106: 2084: 2050: 2049: 1959: 1958: 1922: 1917: 1868: 1863: 1811: 1798: 1739: 1723: 1722:of the term 1709: 1686: 1685: 1657: 1630: 1629: 1589: 1588: 1570: 1548: 1521: 1520: 1495: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1446: 1445: 1423: 1404: 1386: 1372: 1358: 1341: 1245: 1239: 1231: 1195: 1172: 1133: 1132: 1086: 1034: 1033: 997: 964: 941: 940: 913: 891: 866: 865: 853: 806: 805: 772: 771: 752: 734: 711: 710: 677: 652: 651: 605: 604: 553: 552: 529: 528: 498: 476: 450: 449: 415: 414: 377: 376: 347: 344:PUF question 331:BladeBronson 328: 312:Andy Dingley 301: 267: 266: 253:Andy Dingley 248: 245:WP:NOTBUREAU 241:Cheeseladder 221: 220: 206:Andy Dingley 202:constructive 201: 182: 181: 162:Andy Dingley 158:Fred Copeman 155: 130: 129: 108: 75: 43: 37: 4664:S Philbrick 4536:MfD backlog 4530:MfD backlog 4434:ABC Network 3989:Harassment? 3893:Jatilsharma 3451:Fluor Corp. 3335:Thanks. -- 2731:Looks like 2706:AlbertBikaj 2679:NintendoFan 2654:Philafrenzy 2604:Philafrenzy 2588:Philafrenzy 1800:discussion. 1624:Its hosted 1412:WP:NFCC#10a 1337:submissions 1318:submissions 1301:submissions 1278:submissions 1259:submissions 1222:submissions 1207:submissions 36:This is an 5204:Shouldn't 4945:CorporateM 4803:. Cheers, 4454:. Thanks, 4411:BeatlesVox 4364:BeatlesVox 4348:BeatlesVox 4270:BeatlesVox 4254:BeatlesVox 4062:CorporateM 4016:. Cheers, 3993:Regarding 3965:WP:Consent 3915:WP:CONSENT 3716:CorporateM 3678:CorporateM 3643:CorporateM 3606:CorporateM 3558:Invisalign 3544:CorporateM 3526:CorporateM 3484:CorporateM 3468:CorporateM 3459:Invisalign 3444:Invisalign 3095:WP:TWINKLE 2541:Randykitty 2299:Windows XP 2293:Windows XP 2232:. Cheers, 2230:WP:CONSENT 1979:EdJohnston 1682:WP:NFLISTS 1678:WP:NFLISTS 1628:. Cheers, 1489:D'Ranged 1 1483:WP:IAR-abg 1417:D'Ranged 1 1280:) and the 1177:? Thanks. 709:. Cheers, 648:WP:Consent 597:WP:CONSENT 180:. Cheers, 95:Archive 13 87:Archive 10 5167:INeverCry 5060:WP:CSD#G7 4937:BabyFirst 4801:WP:REFUND 4599:converted 4575:Thank you 4438:Read the 4430:BabyFirst 4055:BabyFirst 3950:Dunncon13 3919:WP:NFCC#1 3853:WP:NFCC#1 3849:WP:NFCC#1 3602:WP:NORUSH 3598:BabyFirst 3591:BabyFirst 3540:BabyFirst 3404:Guettarda 3367:Guettarda 2610:WP:NFCC#8 2188:WP:NFCC#1 2138:WP:NFCC#1 1918:every one 1840:Yesterday 1797:states: " 1732:Yesterday 1724:Yesterday 1716:Yesterday 1507:WP:NFCC#8 1466:WP:NFCC#8 1408:WP:NFCC#8 1352:J Milburn 1314:Cloudz679 1274:12george1 1261:) taking 1153:Matzohboy 1125:WP:NFCC#8 1121:WP:NFCC#1 1105:WP:NFCC#1 1090:Matzohboy 1061:Yesterday 967:Yesterday 961:Yesterday 729:It fails 517:WP:NFCC#1 494:this file 160:article. 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 5340:contribs 5328:unsigned 5023:WP:AGFed 4899:Thanks, 4825:J Mo 101 4776:J Mo 101 4610:Armbrust 4580:Armbrust 4540:Armbrust 4490:Thanks! 4389:Hi, TL, 4240:issues. 4154:articles 3901:contribs 3889:unsigned 3833:Craigboy 3057:contribs 3001:contribs 2947:(public) 2688:Contribs 2616:Eeekster 2111:e.g. at 2028:WP:ANRFC 1996:User:Jwy 1808:WP:ANRFC 1795:WP:ANRFC 1776:WP:ANRFC 1758:User:Jwy 1545:Heads up 1390:contribs 1380:Miyagawa 1376:contribs 1366:The ed17 1362:contribs 1240:Peresvet 1218:Casliber 897:Armbrust 884:Thanks. 856:Armbrust 5279:Stefan2 4901:Jhona43 4456:DPL bot 4275:in the 4162:Stefan2 3770:Athrash 3263:~ Nahid 3206:~ Nahid 3047:Penguin 2991:Penguin 2979:token? 2977:WP:OTRS 2867:WP:NFCC 2737:Firefox 2624:Stefan2 2276:WP:FACR 2212:EllenCT 2174:EllenCT 2132:EllenCT 2116:EllenCT 2086:Jaydiem 2032:WP:RFCs 2021:Jaydiem 1924:Jaydiem 1870:Jaydiem 1813:Jaydiem 1741:Jaydiem 1554:Werieth 1441:WP:NFCC 1436:WP:NFCC 1232:Poltava 1203:Godot13 1179:Werieth 1117:WP:NFCC 1069:call me 999:Jaydiem 979:call me 926:Stefan2 731:NFCC# 2 699:WP:NFCC 628:that.-- 601:WP:OTRS 479:We hope 435:We hope 397:We hope 354:We hope 178:WP:NFCC 39:archive 5332:TheJae 5297:TLSuda 5255:Holdek 5238:TLSuda 5210:Holdek 5183:TLSuda 5133:TLSuda 5125:WP:AGF 5093:TLSuda 5030:TLSuda 4963:TLSuda 4919:TLSuda 4869:TLSuda 4841:WP:MCQ 4808:TLSuda 4750:Meters 4733:TLSuda 4715:Meters 4686:TLSuda 4669:(Talk) 4623:TLSuda 4553:TLSuda 4513:TLSuda 4373:TLSuda 4284:TLSuda 4190:TLSuda 4100:TLSuda 4080:TLSuda 4021:TLSuda 4014:WP:ANI 3972:TLSuda 3926:TLSuda 3860:TLSuda 3810:TLSuda 3790:TLSuda 3734:TLSuda 3695:TLSuda 3661:TLSuda 3625:TLSuda 3565:TLSuda 3502:TLSuda 3455:Paxata 3422:TLSuda 3386:TLSuda 3320:TLSuda 3238:TLSuda 3230:WP:AGF 3102:TLSuda 3091:WP:FFD 3020:TLSuda 2942:TLSuda 2917:Sitush 2884:TLSuda 2853:Sitush 2838:Sitush 2807:TLSuda 2773:TLSuda 2637:TLSuda 2630:WP:FFD 2564:TLSuda 2555:tough. 2477:TLSuda 2424:TLSuda 2403:Legend 2400:Aussie 2381:TLSuda 2360:Legend 2357:Aussie 2338:TLSuda 2312:Legend 2309:Aussie 2237:TLSuda 2195:TLSuda 2157:TLSuda 2075:TLSuda 2053:TLSuda 1962:TLSuda 1865:issue. 1689:TLSuda 1633:TLSuda 1592:TLSuda 1524:TLSuda 1516:WP:IAR 1449:TLSuda 1378:) and 1320:) and 1307:from 1288:from 1234:(1894) 1136:TLSuda 1071:Russ) 1037:TLSuda 981:Russ) 944:TLSuda 869:TLSuda 826:Holdek 809:TLSuda 792:Holdek 775:TLSuda 757:Holdek 739:Holdek 714:TLSuda 703:WP:NFC 684:Holdek 655:TLSuda 608:TLSuda 556:TLSuda 532:TLSuda 453:TLSuda 418:TLSuda 380:TLSuda 373:WP:FFD 369:WP:PUF 270:TLSuda 224:TLSuda 185:TLSuda 133:TLSuda 4851:Nthep 4316:their 3298:WP:G6 3222:Nahid 3141:Stalk 2874:Db-f7 2860:Db-f3 2527:about 2280:Dan56 1612:Hobit 1610:it? 1574:Hobit 1065:R'n'B 1020:R'n'B 990:R'n'B 975:R'n'B 115:Ankry 16:< 5336:talk 5304:talk 5283:talk 5259:talk 5245:talk 5214:talk 5190:talk 5140:talk 5114:talk 5100:talk 5079:talk 5037:talk 5005:talk 4970:talk 4949:Talk 4926:talk 4905:talk 4876:talk 4855:talk 4829:talk 4815:talk 4796:Done 4780:talk 4754:talk 4740:talk 4719:talk 4693:talk 4630:talk 4560:talk 4534:The 4520:talk 4498:talk 4460:talk 4415:talk 4407:Rob 4399:97th 4380:talk 4352:talk 4341:Rob 4291:talk 4258:talk 4197:talk 4182:Done 4166:talk 4107:talk 4087:talk 4066:Talk 4042:talk 4028:talk 4003:talk 3979:talk 3954:talk 3933:talk 3897:talk 3881:Hi, 3867:talk 3837:talk 3817:talk 3797:talk 3741:talk 3720:Talk 3712:here 3702:talk 3682:Talk 3668:talk 3647:Talk 3632:talk 3610:Talk 3572:talk 3548:Talk 3530:Talk 3509:talk 3472:Talk 3463:here 3429:talk 3408:talk 3393:talk 3371:talk 3341:talk 3337:Whpq 3327:talk 3306:talk 3302:Whpq 3255:here 3245:talk 3220:Hey 3109:talk 3080:talk 3070:Help 3053:talk 3027:talk 2997:talk 2951:talk 2921:talk 2891:talk 2851:Hey 2842:talk 2834:this 2814:talk 2794:talk 2780:talk 2752:talk 2710:talk 2684:Talk 2658:talk 2652:OK. 2644:talk 2620:and 2592:talk 2571:talk 2545:talk 2504:talk 2484:talk 2462:talk 2431:talk 2388:talk 2345:talk 2303:your 2284:talk 2244:talk 2226:here 2216:talk 2202:talk 2178:talk 2164:talk 2142:here 2120:talk 2091:talk 2081:here 2060:talk 2000:talk 1983:talk 1969:talk 1929:talk 1875:talk 1867:" — 1818:talk 1780:here 1762:talk 1746:talk 1696:talk 1664:talk 1640:talk 1626:here 1616:talk 1599:talk 1578:talk 1558:talk 1531:talk 1512:WP:N 1456:talk 1384:talk 1370:talk 1356:talk 1236:and 1183:talk 1169:NFCR 1157:talk 1143:talk 1094:talk 1044:talk 1004:talk 951:talk 930:talk 892:Done 876:talk 830:talk 816:talk 796:talk 782:talk 761:talk 743:talk 721:talk 701:and 688:talk 662:talk 634:talk 615:talk 582:talk 563:talk 539:talk 505:talk 483:talk 460:talk 439:talk 425:talk 401:talk 387:talk 358:talk 335:talk 316:talk 277:talk 257:talk 231:talk 210:talk 192:talk 166:talk 140:talk 119:talk 4986:Hi 4847:not 4440:FAQ 4220:how 4149:). 3041:ute 2985:ute 2953:) 2902:was 2331:bot 1339:). 306:of 5342:) 5338:• 5306:) 5285:) 5261:) 5247:) 5231:}} 5225:{{ 5216:) 5192:) 5142:) 5116:) 5102:) 5081:) 5039:) 5007:) 4972:) 4951:) 4928:) 4907:) 4878:) 4857:) 4831:) 4817:) 4782:) 4756:) 4742:) 4721:) 4695:) 4632:) 4562:) 4522:) 4500:) 4462:) 4417:) 4382:) 4354:) 4332:am 4293:) 4260:) 4199:) 4168:) 4109:) 4089:) 4068:) 4044:) 4030:) 4005:) 3981:) 3956:) 3935:) 3903:) 3899:• 3869:) 3839:) 3819:) 3799:) 3772:| 3743:) 3722:) 3704:) 3684:) 3670:) 3649:) 3634:) 3612:) 3574:) 3550:) 3532:) 3511:) 3474:) 3431:) 3410:) 3395:) 3373:) 3343:) 3329:) 3308:) 3247:) 3111:) 3082:) 3059:} 3055:• 3044:st 3029:) 3003:} 2999:• 2988:st 2923:) 2893:) 2877:}} 2871:{{ 2863:}} 2857:{{ 2844:) 2816:) 2796:) 2782:) 2754:) 2712:) 2686:, 2660:) 2646:) 2594:) 2573:) 2547:) 2506:) 2486:) 2464:) 2433:) 2413:) 2390:) 2370:) 2347:) 2322:) 2286:) 2246:) 2218:) 2204:) 2180:) 2166:) 2122:) 2093:) 2062:) 2002:) 1985:) 1971:) 1931:) 1877:) 1820:) 1764:) 1748:) 1698:) 1666:) 1642:) 1618:) 1601:) 1580:) 1560:) 1533:) 1474:is 1458:) 1392:) 1364:) 1185:) 1159:) 1145:) 1096:) 1046:) 1006:) 996:— 953:) 932:) 922:}} 916:{{ 895:. 878:) 832:) 818:) 798:) 784:) 763:) 745:) 723:) 690:) 664:) 636:) 617:) 584:) 565:) 551:. 541:) 507:) 485:) 462:) 441:) 427:) 403:) 389:) 360:) 337:) 318:) 279:) 259:) 233:) 212:) 194:) 168:) 142:) 121:) 91:→ 5334:( 5302:( 5281:( 5257:( 5243:( 5212:( 5188:( 5138:( 5112:( 5098:( 5077:( 5035:( 5019:: 5015:@ 5003:( 4968:( 4947:( 4924:( 4903:( 4874:( 4853:( 4827:( 4813:( 4778:( 4752:( 4738:( 4717:( 4691:( 4628:( 4558:( 4518:( 4496:( 4458:( 4446:. 4413:( 4378:( 4366:: 4362:@ 4350:( 4324:I 4289:( 4272:: 4268:@ 4256:( 4195:( 4164:( 4129:⚠ 4105:( 4085:( 4064:( 4040:( 4026:( 4001:( 3977:( 3952:( 3931:( 3895:( 3865:( 3835:( 3815:( 3795:( 3739:( 3718:( 3700:( 3680:( 3666:( 3645:( 3630:( 3608:( 3570:( 3546:( 3528:( 3507:( 3486:: 3482:@ 3470:( 3427:( 3406:( 3391:( 3369:( 3339:( 3325:( 3304:( 3243:( 3138:/ 3107:( 3078:( 3051:{ 3038:C 3025:( 2995:{ 2982:C 2949:( 2919:( 2889:( 2840:( 2812:( 2792:( 2778:( 2766:: 2762:@ 2750:( 2708:( 2690:) 2682:( 2656:( 2642:( 2626:: 2622:@ 2618:: 2614:@ 2606:: 2602:@ 2590:( 2569:( 2543:( 2502:( 2482:( 2460:( 2429:( 2410:✉ 2407:( 2386:( 2367:✉ 2364:( 2343:( 2319:✉ 2316:( 2282:( 2242:( 2214:( 2200:( 2176:( 2162:( 2134:: 2130:@ 2118:( 2089:( 2077:: 2073:@ 2058:( 2023:: 2019:@ 1998:/ 1994:( 1981:( 1967:( 1927:( 1873:( 1816:( 1760:/ 1744:( 1694:( 1662:( 1638:( 1614:( 1597:( 1576:( 1556:( 1529:( 1496:T 1494:V 1454:( 1424:T 1422:V 1387:· 1382:( 1373:· 1368:( 1359:· 1354:( 1349:. 1335:( 1316:( 1299:( 1276:( 1257:( 1220:( 1205:( 1181:( 1155:( 1141:( 1092:( 1067:( 1042:( 1022:: 1018:@ 1002:( 988:@ 977:( 949:( 928:( 874:( 828:( 814:( 794:( 780:( 759:( 741:( 719:( 686:( 660:( 632:( 613:( 580:( 561:( 537:( 503:( 481:( 458:( 437:( 423:( 399:( 385:( 356:( 333:( 314:( 275:( 255:( 229:( 208:( 190:( 164:( 138:( 117:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index