User talk:MichaelT1979 - Knowledge (XXG)

380:(Perhaps that refers to a certain type of bed?) I'm going to the library tomorrow for something else, so I'll try to find out something there, but do you happen to know where I might look for such info? There's surprisingly little on the internet about it! Also, I'm temporarily suffering from historic building fatigue, so my next Crawley-related actions will be improving the neighbourhood articles. Most, except Bewbush which you did a big update of about a year ago, are in dismal condition. (The articles, that is!) Look out for updates any time soon; I'll probably go at them one by one rather than attacking all of them at once. As with the main Crawley article, there may be some bits you can add to on topics I'm less familiar with. 790:, it seems that ALL his contributions are removing those tags(with pretty much the same edit summaries), while the articles involved are lacking appropiate citations indeed. However, although he ignores the warning placed on his page, please beware that he might be a newcomer (His first contribution was on Aug 24) and simply doesn't know about user talk pages, as he is lacking a User page. Nevertheless, I tried to Email him but failed due to the lack of an Email address specified by him. So, unfortunately, you might wanna check out 720: 36: 2006: 1866: 1512: 1018: 947: 628:

still churning away trying to think where I would find this. Even if you are right and I am wrong, it would be good to find it if only to refute it. No doubt lots of tedious checks could find it through Hansard or something but that would be a hell of a lot of work to trace and, as you suggest (I think), may still not be accurate because the actual rubber stamp date might differ from when the announcements etc.

870: 1922: 1782: 1707: 1568: 1439: 1256: 1138: 1077: 2023:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1883:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1531:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1037:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 522: 849:

best-referenced part of it. Accordingly, it seems timely to separate that into an article in its own write, if only in the hope that a shorter Worthing article might encourage more to make edits to bring it up to standard". I have turned the history into a separate article in the hope that this will make Worthing easier to work with.--

325:

something (think I visited about 10 neighbourhoods in 5 hours, all on foot/by bus) but got completely lost in Bewbush ... once I got beyond Dorsten Square I couldn't see any road names or anything. I think all extant places of worship are covered in the list; let me know if you think of any more in the Borough area.

848:

Re: "I have suggested splitting out the History section from this over-long and unwieldy article. The Worthing article is incomplete and is already over 100kb. The article itself needs considerable work to bring it up to an acceptable standard, but the history section seems to be the best set-out and

498:

Ah! Middle school teacher! That explains it. I nearly ended up at one such myself but it wasn't to be. Anyway, I wasn't trying to promote the old 'form' nomenclature but including it because in my experience many parents still refer back to the old style. Maybe a list allowing them to become familiar

379:

Hi! I've nearly finished an article on the hospital (currently in a sandbox), but I'm having awful trouble finding a figure for the current number of beds. I found 143 in some official-looking online document somewhere, but that doesn't seem right ... I would have thought there are more than that.

349:

A good point about Gatwick: definitely needs to be included for comprehensiveness, being part of the borough, so I've added a section at the end. They don't really fit into the main list as they are a special case, and anyway the photos would just show a room and a door (plus it might be a bit risky

611:

I have not changed the article because I see from your talk that you know more about Crawley than I do. It should be changed but wanted to reply to you first. It is a complete cock-up on my part, I do have references but would be hard pressed to find the best. Any suggestions welcome. David Kynaston

433:

Hi - thanks for uploading the original logo for this article. I have uploaded a new version on request of review staff since there is a new official logo available. I also re-sized the thumbnail in the article so that the new text is readable. I hope these edits are alright with you and feel free to

324:

Hi! Thanks for your note and barnstar (I've fiddled around with the code); and particular thanks for uploading the pic of the church at Bewbush. I went on a marathon trip round town yesterday, trying to get as many photos as possible before moving the article from my sandbox; I managed about 22 or

223:

Hi Tafkam; thanks for your note and the map link. I was rather confused by the whole thing when I wrote it originally in the listed buildings article, and in fact as you say I did have it the wrong way round. I had been searching online for an old map, trying to confirm where CP was in relation to

627:

We are not going to reconcile this until I can find RS. Having essentially been born in Stevenage and grew up there (I was acually born in Welwyn Garden City as there was no maternity ward at the new Lister Hospital in stevenage in 1972) you can imagine we were kinda taught a lot about this. I am

770:

following several edits of pages removing the reference request tags. The user has again logged in and repeated the actions (as shown on his edit history). I'm not sure whether a higher level warning should be issued, or a block requested. Can someone advise - or better still, deal with the next

224:

the boundary, without success, so in the end the text got mixed up! Comparing the position and the boundary on your map with the current boundary and equivalent position on the modern map, it was clearly moved from Surrey to West Sussex. Thanks also for adding the scan of the 1932 OS map to

1580:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1719:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1682: 457:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 1451:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1333:

the up loop should be drawn completely straight. The catchpoints are about 50m from the end of the loop. The platform(s) here are 200m long while the double line section is 400m long, so a freight train about 350m can be crossed.

1965: 1825: 1747: 1608: 1479: 127:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge (XXG) policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 1394:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 175:- I moved it in the template to independent preps as it is an independent school. Fine so far but if you go to the The Dharma School article the template there is still showing it in state primaries! 1949:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1809:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1731:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1592:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1463:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1935: 1795: 571:

with 82.16.110.215 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

985:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1288:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1170:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1109:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1214: 1210: 158:

both seem fine on the template but do not seem to work on their own pages, if you see what I mean. Could you have a look and see what I have done wrong, if anything? Many thanks.

1284:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1166:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1105:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

981:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

646:

Kynaston says p159 "In order of designation, Stevenage, Crawley, Hemel Hempstead, harlow, Hatfield, Welwyn, Basildon and Bracknel.. (About the ones from from the warime

461:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 974:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1159:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1098:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1273:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1155:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1094:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 970:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 899:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 525:

Hi MichaelT1979! An article you have been involved with urgently needs expanding (references required) to avoid becoming a candidate for a deletion proposal (

283: 273: 200:

with an edit summary saying that it's erroneous? I think I may have been mistaken to say 'includes' on the LEAs which are all three-tier but numerous counties

1277:

if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

824:

for proposed structure. I plan to write a separate History of Worthing article as well. This will be a long-term thing; any advice or assistance welcome.

1317: 1224: 318: 2035: 1895: 1543: 1293: 1175: 1114: 1049: 990: 733: 1652:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

484: 300: 135: 1220: 683: 94:

Hi, I've just come across the above, it's obviously written in good faith by, it appears, an ex pupil. I've added some info on the school to

1987: 1847: 1761: 1622: 1493: 1419: 1167: 1106: 1270: 1152: 1091: 1198: 473: 1983: 1843: 1757: 1618: 1489: 1415: 1958: 1818: 1740: 1646: 1601: 1472: 1217:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 454: 854: 2019:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1879:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1527:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1033:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 962:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 915: 404:

Hmm ~ some surprising info there about the hospital! Thanks for the links. I have moved the article to mainspace today.

2024: 1884: 1532: 1278: 1160: 1099: 1038: 975: 468: 232:

article. Anyway, look out for more Crawley building articles ... The George might be next, but needs lots of research!

2015: 1523: 1285: 1143: 560: 549: 1406:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

919: 885: 1970: 1830: 1752: 1613: 1484: 1411: 1330: 1265:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1147:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1086:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1197:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

60: 54: 892: 119: 850: 71: 1946: 1806: 1728: 1589: 1460: 650:). I would still love to find the reference that made me think the other: That is what I was told as a child. 1261: 1029: 958: 568: 261: 982: 87: 1875: 900: 833: 413: 389: 359: 334: 241: 171:

Thanks for the reply, however what I meant was that the template seems fine as you say, but let's look at

1407: 881: 1690: 1316: 1082: 580: 564: 95: 1657: 884:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

1686: 1301: 1183: 1122: 1059: 1000: 930: 821: 308: 197: 1929: 1789: 1715: 1576: 1447: 1429: 1383: 1374: 925:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

896: 745: 726: 719: 655: 633: 617: 209: 1942: 1802: 1724: 1585: 1456: 1403: 1387: 967: 1639: 1364: 1345: 799: 693: 98:

but I'm not at all sure that it's notable enough for its own article. What do you think? Regards

77: 435: 276:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

1683:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination)

1677:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination)

1240: 826: 680: 538: 406: 382: 352: 327: 234: 172: 155: 1954: 1814: 1736: 1597: 1468: 1399: 1391: 1274: 1156: 1095: 971: 907: 269: 124: 1977: 1837: 1667: 1653: 946: 776: 576: 556: 151: 73: 35: 1957:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1950: 1817:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1810: 1739:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1732: 1600:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1593: 1471:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1464: 1402:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1395: 911: 791: 572: 458: 265: 2043: 1903: 1551: 1297: 1179: 1118: 1053: 994: 926: 761: 706: 439: 304: 296: 180: 163: 131: 103: 2020: 1880: 1528: 1266: 1148: 1087: 1034: 963: 741: 668: 651: 629: 613: 506: 480: 229: 205: 150:

Hi, I wonder if you could help, I've been having a look at the above and I have added

1360: 1341: 1231:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

795: 787: 767: 608:

polio outbreak and so they made it Stevenage (where I grew up). My mistake entirely.

589: 530: 1236: 1232: 820:

overhaul? I now feel like doing something similar for the town where I work. See

534: 1921: 1781: 1706: 1567: 1438: 869: 1663: 1323: 772: 17: 914:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 740:

I think Crawley was designated first but am racking my brains for an RS here.

2039: 1899: 1547: 676: 177: 160: 100: 895:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

272:. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an 75: 502: 2047: 1991: 1907: 1851: 1765: 1694: 1671: 1626: 1555: 1497: 1423: 1368: 1349: 1305: 1244: 1187: 1126: 1065: 1005: 934: 858: 842: 803: 780: 749: 659: 637: 621: 584: 542: 510: 488: 443: 422: 398: 368: 343: 312: 250: 213: 183: 166: 139: 106: 810: 1961:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1821:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1743:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1604:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1475:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

521: 289:

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

1939:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1799:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1390:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

817: 225: 286:

on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.

1206: 1202: 567:

with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider

449:

Image copyright problem with File:MidhurstIntermediateSchoolPhoto.jpg

268:, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets 1337:

Albion Park has two side platforms rather than an island platform.

533:, improve the article if you can, and leave any comments there.-- 264:. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of 906:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

1974:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1834:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 526: 1964:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

1824:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1746:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1607:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1478:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

464:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1933:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1649:

tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease add your sources.

204:

have partial three-tier systems, including Suffolk and Warks.

78: 29: 1322:

Could you make a second version of this diagram, showing two

350:

taking pix in airports in these security-conscious times!).

2004: 1864: 1510: 1132:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Worthing High School logo.png)

1016: 945: 868: 736:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

718: 228:; not only is it useful there, but it proved helpful in the 918:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 196:

Hi. I'm just wondering why you removed the info I added to

2001:

Orphaned non-free image File:Worthing High School logo.png

1505:

Orphaned non-free image File:Worthing High School logo.png

1793:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1945: