User talk:Teammm/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

1855:"no context" - naming the society would not be context, it would be further detail. The society was in fact named in previous edits but that level of detail was repeatedly removed by other editors. It's a matter of opinion how much detail is appropriate, but I agree with others who felt that naming the society itself was excessive. How was Sullivan criticised - again, the precise wording Johnson employed is detail not context. It occupied most of a published page - there are selected quotes on the talk page. Something notable enough - this is editorial opinion. It won't be demonstrated by adding more and more detail. We have to accept that I think it is notable enough for inclusion for reasons I have outlined, but a number of people disagree. In my opinion those other people have given poor reasons for their standpoint but we all have to accept is that these are opposing opinions not alternative realities. There is no Platonic standard for biographical data. Was Johnson suffering from bitterness or jealousy at the age of 24? - I have no idea whether he was. Both Johnson and Sullivan are respected commentators. The fact that they were in their twenties when one of them criticised the other has no bearing on Johnson's motives, nor is it fair comment to speculate on his emotional state at the time. There are a great many other instances noted in Sullivan's entry dealing with his disagreements with people, as one would expect, so to single this one out for repeated deletion is puzzling. Is the inclusion....meant to portray Sullivan in a negative light unecessarily? - goes to my own motives, I suppose. No, it isn't meant to portray Sullivan negatively at all (NPOV means there is NO "necessary" negative portrayal anyway). It's meant to add salient biographical detail to the one occasion on which Sullivan contested an election. In my opinion this is relevant detail given his career. Similar detail has been included by other editors in other people's biographies. I know you disagree with me as to relevance as stated above. Why your POV rather than mine should prevail is the question. The source I used is "not accessible" - It's a book! I accept that makes it less accessible than something on the internet but it's just incorrect to call it not accessible. Countless other wikipedia entries reference hard copy sources. 1792:"The subject you referenced is no where else in the article, so the addition makes no sense" That's not correct. The subject I referenced is Sullivan's election to office which is mentioned (another contributor's words, not mine) in the preceding half of the same sentence - I simply added a subordinate clause to an existing factual statement. Please read my edit again. If you still think it is "not cohesive" and "out of place" I would be grateful for an explanation of where in the article it would sit better. I don't intend to waste any more of time editing this particular article given the reaction of certain people, but I am genuinely puzzled by the supposed rationale. I would love to think that professional standards of biographical writing are being applied here, but I do appreciate that other contributors are doing their best in a field which is not their "day job". If you can shed any light to reassure me that would be great. I have messaged you directly as well. Thank you Oinky (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 2893:

journalist communities, it is bizarre to suggest that most people would know the referendum by its ballot position rather than by its subject matter. If you aren't in Maryland, go the grocery store (it's a Saturday, so it should be busy) and ask the first 50 adults what they would type if they were searching for information about Maryland's same-sex marriage referendum. Then, ask the next 50 what "Maryland Question 6" is. Finally, ask the next 50 what the question number of Maryland's same-sex marriage referendum is. The name "Question 6" is an insider's term, unknown to most people not in a Maryland media market or heavily into the topic (as you and I clearly are). What's more, the disparity will only grow as we move forward from the election. This is not Prop 8, where it has become so mainstream that everyone just calls it that, and suggesting the contrary is just ridiculous. -

1276:

weekend, that's it. The information on that section of the page now is unhelpful and incorrect. I loved the film Quiz Show. I wished it had been a hit so more films like it would have been made, but the facts are it performed poorly and was released to very few screens. I only care because I was trying to be helpful and put a fact of its box office up but it keeps getting changed. It makes me very worried that informationon Knowledge (XXG) is not false because someone is mistaken, but wrong because someone has an agenda to make up facts and Knowledge (XXG) will present them as truth even when the truth is added to the page. I feel s though even this message will yield results that the false information on that page will remain. Look it up if you want.

2772:. Anyone who has not followed this election closely will have no idea what "Question 6" is. That is, in this context, the definition of inaccessible. Can you genuinely sit there and justify to yourself that in a general purpose encyclopedia it makes more sense not to have "same-sex marriage referendum" in the title of an article about a referendum on same-sex marriage? I'm sorry, but the only argument beside your "emphasizing the notability" one is that the other is official. That simply doesn't matter. Guidelines specifically state that we ignore the official title in favour of the common name. So please, explain why an officious, inaccessible title is better than one that is clear and actually follows guidelines. - 1760:

this is a point of view. If I put in Mr X's biography that Mr X said that the sky is green and that Ms Y said he was stupid for saying so this is factually correct and a neutral statement. Anyhow, I have given up trying to explain the distinction to you all and as for Mark's view on what is and is not relevant to biography, he is inconsistent with other instances I found very easily. However, I have lots of other things to get on with so will leave you all to this one. Love, Light and Peace

1225:, so that you can recognize that even being disruptive does not qualify an edit as vandalism? You seem to have used the vandalism claim and templates quite inappropriately; it should not be used a marker to simply claim that your wording is prefefred to his. If you continue to abuse the vandalism claim and templating in this way, you are apt to find someone addressing it through policy channels, whether you feel you have time for policy concerns or not. -- 1988:. One last thing before we go; I believe you are underestimating the importance of the Oxford Union and its presidential elections in the context of the presidents' subsequent careers. I have reviewed the wikipedia entries of those past presidents from the last 40 years who have them. There are 20 in total. 7 of them (35%), not including Andrew Sullivan's, include reference to the circumstances of their election, sometimes at some length. See you on 2092: 31: 1524:. Anyone can find articles criticizing, that doesn't make it legitimate enough to add into the article. The sources must be reliable and the information should be cohesive. A criticism section on a biography needs to be scrutinized for necessity, strict reliability, and neutrality. We don't just add any old opinion from sources who felt the need to criticize something. Also, please make sure you click the 2215: 2024: 1873:

After everything you've said, I don't doubt that you sincerely believe in your reasoning. But, the addition of that statement goes to the character of Andrew Sullivan. My question is, does it have the notable importance to warrant a place in the article? Is Sullivan's creation of a university society

977:

Yep I've seen The Avengers and it was great! Love me some Captain America! lol But my favorite superhero is none other than Spiderman, so I gotta see him. Hopefully he's in the sequel to The Avengers. Tobey Maguire was really good as Spiderman, I always liked him. Sweet guy. Now, Andrew Garfield is a

2787:

Is it possible you misunderstand the point of what I am trying to do? The article is currently at "Question 6", which is far from "emphasizing the notability". I am trying to move it back to "Maryland same-sex marriage referendum, 2012", but there is a redirect in the way that needs to be deleted to

1788:

Hi Oinky. There seems to be an edit war going on at Andrew Sullivan. The statement you added is not cohesive where you placed and is out of place. The subject you referenced is no where else in the article, so the addition makes no sense. Please discuss issues on the talk page and don't edit war, as

2999:

in in quotation marks, it returned any page with the terms "question", "6", and "maryland". Your "referendum" searches are way too restrictive, as the point is to find the use of the generic reference to the referendum, not the exact phrase "maryland same-sex marriage referendum". When you use fair

2892:

Simply not true. Your first search is invalid because "question 6" must be in quotation marks, otherwise any site that has "question" and "6" and "maryland" is returned; even without the quotation marks, you overshoot the truth by more than 200 million. Outside of the pro- and anti-SSM activist and

1568:

Do you think that it is worth trying for GA status on the article now, or would it be more appropriate to wait until after November, win or lose(ug). Having said that, since both of us are Marylanders who have interest in one side of the issue, hopefully we can get someone who can look out of NNPOV

1323:

Also, the additions you made regarding release dates, etc. doesn't conform to the format of Knowledge (XXG) and could contain info that's already in the infobox or unnecessary to add at all. You can learn how to make tables, etc. using the links I placed on your talk page when I welcomed you. Thank

1295:

because the source is essentially a paper from college students giving a critique of the movie. Maybe you could find some information in another source that would be more reliable that rates the success of the box office based on how much it cost to make the movie and what it was expected to earn,

1164:

That's your opinion, sir. I reverted it strongly the second time according to my understanding and the given situation. The notice I placed on the user's talk page notified him or her that the edit was not constructive, then he or she did it again three days later. Still the notice I placed for the

1759:

You are not the only person to confuse a statement ABOUT a point of view with the point of view itself. This does seem to be a perennial problem with wikipedia contributors. If Mr X says the sky is green this is factually inaccurate. If Ms Y says that Mr X is stupid for saying the sky is green

1275:

What exactly is unhelpful about my additon to the box office section of Quiz Show? I linked to articles that show the truth. "Quiz Show was a box office success" is an opinion and even the link used does not go with this sentence. All the linked article states is that the film had a strong opening

951:

Really? Jealous!! I'm not so keen on the new Spiderman...I liked Tobey Maguire and this new guy is unattractive and strange to me. The b/f has been bugging me to go see it but i can't bear to watch him butcher the series or ruin the memories i have of the other 3 films. Have you seen the Avengers

1850:

OK, point by point, and I will do this because - thank you - you have taken the trouble to explain your motives and you are highly active on Knowledge (XXG) (much more than I am) so it matters that someone of your standing "gets" the way biography works. You will appreciate that Knowledge (XXG)

1584:

Hey Naraht, you can nominate it if you want or you can just ask someone to look over the article and fix any issues or rewrite paragraphs to make them better. I honestly don't think it's GA material right now, particularly the "recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriages" section. I was still

1500:

You deleted the entire Criticism section I added to the Anderson Cooper article. I have undone that revision. If you feel that an edit or a section is inadequate, you are more than welcome to enrich it by adding further context. However, there is no conceivable reason why a page on a journalist

1799:"He was educated at Reigate Grammar School, and studied at Magdalen College, Oxford, where he was awarded a first-class degree Bachelor of Arts in modern history and modern languages. In his second year, he was elected president of the Oxford Union, holding the office in Trinity term 1983, 2302:

when he was about to respond. Then you removed it after he restored/responded to it, which left his comment partially out of context. But he striked through that part of his response and left a note about it. So it's moot anyway. I just wanted to ask you about it. Thanks for replying.

2019:

isn't supposed to be primarily political; it's supposed to be for education or social welfare. I didn't want to wade into this myself, as I was pretty sure somebody more familiar with the subject matter would happen along soon enough if I tagged it. And, well... it didn't take long.

809: 1909:, where other people can know about and address the concerns. Looking at the history, it's clear that the two of you are not the only two concerned over the edit, so even if the two of you come to some accord, you're likely to just be reworking it out with the people there. -- 2651:

No. I wish there was a choice between defaults but that's the only one available. U.S. articles use MDY format and there's no way to do it automatically in the citation template, we can only type it manually. Maybe we can request a change on a board somewhere, I'm not sure.

2448: 2256:

guideline about not removing your comment(s) after others have replied to it (them)? I know that the other editor hadn't replied to it yet, but he was going to (as shown on the talk page), and I just wanted to know if you'd have removed the comment after he replied.

1851:

comes under enormous external criticism for perceived poor quality content so it is important that we all do our best to ensure that good editorial principles are followed. I am doing my best here and I would like to think I will have your support.

1165:

second time stated it wasn't constructive. Two times the person was given a polite notice. You don't have to police my edits because I don't abuse or overuse anything I do. And I've moved on. Will you? Thank you and have a nice one, Nat. –

2805:

I just looked back at my talk page, and clearly you somehow think "Question 6" "emphasizes the notability" of the article. You also try to make an argument from recognizability, but as I point out in my response to you at my talk page,

2767:

What kind of drivel is that? Show me where in any naming convention anywhere in the guidelines "emphasizing the notability" is ever mentioned. The rule, unless there is a specific naming convention to the contrary, is to the the

2571: 2790:

If you think it should be at "Maryland Question 6 (2012)", explain how that is a better title and, for that matter, how it is more notable for being the 6th question on the ballot than for being a referendum on SSM.

1096:

I appreciate you have strong opinions on the matter, but someone replacing "sexual orientation" with "sexual preference" seems a legitimate attempt at editing, and should not be labeled "vandalism", as you did at

2013:"... the Human Rights Campaign, a 501(c)(4) organization that focuses on lobbying Congress and state and local officials for support of pro-LGBT bills, and mobilizing grassroots action amongst its members..." 2334:. However, it was stopped by the vandalism filter, and no one ever replied. I suspect my edit is floating in limbo, and I was wondering if you or someone could look into it. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. 2349:

You're welcome. Do you remember what your edit was? There are edit filters on articles that block certain things (ie. email addresses) from being added to articles. You should explain your edit in detail to

2521:

mentioned it to me, and said to ask, wether or not it was possible if you could come up with a signature design for me? or whatever it is you call it, lol. I just thought it would be worth asking, Thanks.

1878:? Have sufficiently reliable secondary sources reported on the supposed controversy? Or is it just in that book you cited, co-authored by Johnson, of which I can't seem to find a summary, or abstract? ~ 2634:

I've noticed you changing date formats in citations. When I use the editing templates, the date format for accessdate defaults to this format: 29 October 2012. Do you know a way to change that?

1428:

I'm actually not sure. You probably don't use the stylization throughout the article when referring to it, only when naming the album for example in an infobox or in a list of album titles.

1413:

and want to know whether the stylization of the album title should be the one used throughout the article or the non-stylized, or is it just about consistency and either will do.

1811:) has no context, explaining what society you're talking about, showing how Sullivan was criticized and showing that it's something notable enough to place into his biography. 1144:

Your evidence being? I have trouble seeing how you'd have much knowledge of that particular user, given the lack of edits from that IP address. This seems like a strong

94:

You've made me jealous of your signature!! =] Can you create me a mock up of how mine would look in similar style please Teammm? Thanks and have a nice day/evening

1813:

Is Boris Johnson's criticism of Sullivan's election as President of the Oxford Union during sophomore year in university something that is necessary to mention?

2691:

Yeah, i was having problems with my referencing for some reason. Wouldn't fill in or when it did it listed the full thing out, rather than doing the thing.

2354:. That administrator can help you more than I can on this issue. It has happened to me before so it doesn't necessarily mean that you did something wrong. ~ 2410: 2109: 2028:

Anywho... I took a quick look at your cite, and it doesn't seem to say anything about a 501(c)(4). Are we sure about this fact? It seems questionable.

2163: 2131: 348:<- but is it possible to get the smiley in bold like your last example and the talk + email options on the end mr? Thanks so much for your hard work! 2400: 823:

You did some very nice work for me and you've done some excellent work for me recently! Thank you so much Teammm and feel free to test my super special

978:

little awkward but I've heard nothing but good reviews so he better deliver! lol I'm always hesitant too because I don't want it to be horrendous. –

2396: 1006:

Mines gotta be that Robert Downey Jr =P. Another Iron Man film being produced =D You like those since you appear to like the other Marvel films?

1098: 1789:

that is contrary to a productive atmosphere on Knowledge (XXG), as I'm sure you may know. ツ Teammm (talk · email) 14:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

2406: 1585:

thinking about how to rewrite that section to make it sound better. If any same-sex marriage article deserves GA status, it's the one for

1193:

Also, as you can see, the same person did the same edit a third time. I'm not playing a policy game here. Don't have time for nonsense. –

2304: 2258: 1516:

Correct, I deleted it. The section you added was not constructive and added biased information into a biography of a living person. See

1370: 918: 2091: 1366: 2403:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2159: 2127: 1361:

of an article to which you have recently contributed. Any help in addressing the concerns raised in the review are welcome.--

419:

Ahhh...i learned something today! =] Can you tell me how i get "email" added to the end of my signature mr? Thanks sooo much

1821:

Is the addition of criticism solely meant to portray Sullivan in a negative light unnecessarily, without notable importance?

1801:

though subsequently criticised by Boris Johnson for founding a university society as a vehicle for his electoral ambitions.

2057:

HRC promotes social welfare of the gay and lesbian community through political lobbying. HRC Foundation is educational. ~

1586: 1562: 1874:(I'm not familiar with any of these details really) and the subsequent criticism from another student at that university 2327:

First of all, thank you for your welcome message. I know it was a while ago, but I just wanted to say I appreciate it.

2098: 3053: 2788:

effect the move. So if you think it should be at "Maryland same-sex referendum, 2012", then stop deleting the CSD tag.

1569:

issues. (Only reason that I won't be outside the polls on election day, is that I'll be inside, I'm an election judge)

1398: 1362: 2698: 2387:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

887:

LMAO! I was just thinking i should have my own barnstar section on your userpage since i've given you half of em =P

81: 76: 71: 59: 38: 2148: 2116: 1858:

Hope that makes it clear. With respect, I will ask once again that the edit should stand. Love, Light and Peace

1281: 387:

Yep, I'm glad you like it! The smiley is actually a Japanese letter. If I had used "=D" it wouldn't be as styled.

808: 3028: 2964: 2875: 2721: 2666: 2609: 2575: 2549: 2496: 2366: 2283: 2187: 2069: 1968: 1937: 1890: 1835: 1720: 1649: 1601: 1544: 1479: 1446: 1388: 1336: 1308: 2471: 2308: 2262: 1750: 2769: 2752: 1532:

tab when adding a new conversation to my talk page. I like it to be in order chronologically. Thank you. ~

521:

Yea, it was too long. I had to take green out. Or you can swap green for gold. Wish it allowed a tiny more.

2639: 2447: 1679: 1277: 1410: 1222: 1035:

I like Robert Downey Jr. but I've never seen any of his movies, not even Iron Man. :o Is that bad? lol –

2692: 2527: 2339: 2335: 609:

I'm not sure what the problem is. Still trying to figure it out. Try it again, I changed something. –

2351: 1989: 1985: 1953: 1914: 1906: 1358: 1230: 1153: 1106: 2042: 1698: 1671: 1116:

Disagree. That particular user did the same edit for disruption. Thank you for coming by though. –

1745:, where debates over the significance of Pooh Sticks are threatening to devolve into an edit war. 1622:

Appreciate it. Just love how this music I love listening to has so many stories and facets to it.

1291:

Hi, I'm not too familiar with the article's subject, but the source you provided isn't considered

1063:

That's a crime against nature =P...You have to watch the,, especially if you enjoyed the Avengers

685:"Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags." Strange message but that's what it keeps saying. Thanks 3064: 2467: 2236: 1746: 1077: 1020: 966: 904: 844: 792: 743: 710: 651: 597: 566: 509: 444: 373: 340: 303: 276: 206: 181: 119: 2579: 1993: 1859: 1816: 1775: 1761: 1623: 1502: 1414: 2995:

When you put things in question marks, it searches for that exact phrase. When you didn't put

2635: 2426: 2388: 2147:

Could you please change the size of the font of your sig? It is exceedingly large. Thanks.

1675: 3000:

and reasonable search terms, you get what I reported in my response to you at my talk page. -

2253: 1521: 484:

It looks perfect how it is now =D. Is that small enough for me to use though? Thanks so much

2523: 1819:) For all I know, it could just be bitterness or jealously at the age of 24 (I don't know). 1774:

Copy also of your note on my own talk page and my reply for sake of easy reference: Thanks

1574: 572:<- but it won't let me use it...is it still too big? Thanks for the hard work you put in 47: 17: 2330:

I need help with the vandalism filter. On July 6th, I tried to make an edit to the page on

1517: 1145: 3005: 2898: 2819: 2796: 2777: 2583: 1997: 1910: 1863: 1779: 1765: 1742: 1627: 1506: 1418: 1226: 1149: 1102: 1292: 922:

tonight!! I heard it's really good so I can't resist the temptation until the weekend. –

916:

Lol I'm very well thanks for asking! I had the day off, been relaxed and plan on seeing

858:

Aww thanks! And do you know I checked it again, not realizing you signed with it? lol –

2029: 1694: 3060: 2747: 2518: 2463: 2437: 2417:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2224: 1065: 1008: 954: 892: 832: 780: 731: 687: 639: 574: 554: 524:

Look at it and see what color combo you want. It can only use 3 colors on "Jenova" –

486: 421: 350: 323: 285: 259: 188: 164: 96: 2578:

and the issues that have been addressed (or new observations) would be appreciated.

2422: 2418: 2252:

at the Same-sex marriage talk page, and I wanted to know if you are aware of the

3068: 3040: 3015: 3009: 2976: 2951: 2902: 2887: 2862: 2823: 2800: 2781: 2756: 2733: 2708: 2678: 2653: 2643: 2621: 2596: 2587: 2559: 2538: 2531: 2506: 2485: 2475: 2430: 2376: 2355: 2343: 2312: 2293: 2272: 2266: 2242: 2197: 2176: 2169: 2137: 2105: 2079: 2058: 2051: 2001: 1978: 1957: 1947: 1926: 1918: 1900: 1879: 1867: 1845: 1824: 1783: 1769: 1754: 1730: 1709: 1702: 1683: 1659: 1638: 1631: 1611: 1590: 1578: 1570: 1554: 1533: 1510: 1489: 1468: 1456: 1435: 1422: 1377: 1346: 1325: 1318: 1297: 1285: 1264: 1243: 1234: 1216: 1195: 1188: 1167: 1157: 1139: 1118: 1110: 1083: 1058: 1037: 1026: 1001: 980: 972: 945: 924: 910: 881: 861: 850: 798: 772: 752: 715: 680: 660: 632: 612: 602: 547: 527: 514: 479: 459: 449: 414: 394: 378: 247: 225: 153: 131: 124: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3001: 2894: 2815: 2792: 2773: 2331: 1952:

If I can get Oinky's consent, I would copy and paste the discussion here onto

2271:

The comment was already removed. He put my comment back and replied to it. ~

2016: 2861:

Question 6 is how people refer to it, whether from Maryland or otherwise.

2570:

Hi. Would you be interested in commenting on a featured article candidate

456:

Parentheses? or no parentheses? Hugged up to your name or spaced away? –

2214: 2392: 1501:

should be bereft of criticism regarding that journalist's reporting.

130:

Haha, I made you one with a different font. (better than mine :P) –

2462:

For the references and citations added quickly and with good RS to

1101:. "Vandalism" is a descriptor which should be used with caution. -- 1670:

Given your earlier interest, perhaps you'd care to comment at

25: 2112:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2090: 1296:

because the movie was a success and gained much acclaim. ~

1241:

Sure, you just suggested it. Thank you! Have a good one. –

1905:

Folks, I heartily recommend you move this conversation to

2391:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2299: 2249: 2011:

Hi Teammm. Here's what caught my attention about HRC:

2707:

Every time I edit something, a server error comes up.

2746:Thanks team for fixing the link ! I appreciate :-) 3014:Still, the current title would be the common name. 2983:Your quotation marks are all messed up. The phrase 1984:Yes, I'm happy for the discussion to be copied to 2383:Disambiguation link notification for September 26 2595:Yes. It's great! I can tell you enjoy writing. 1797: 1693:Your clean-up on my odd structure was perfect! 8: 1637:I can definitely relate to that feeling. ~ 2932:"maryland same-sex marriage referendum" = 2537:Hey! No problem. Check your talk page. ~ 2517:Hi there Teammm, I was just wondering as 2097:Hello, Teammm. You have new messages at 1823:The source you used is not accessible. ~ 2850:maryland same-sex marriage referendum = 890:How are you today anyway Teammm? Thanks 2993:maryland "same-sex marriage" referendum 3054:Talk:Maine Question 1, 2012#Title move 2445: 1672:Talk:LGBT parenting#Regnerus follow up 1221:May I suggest you find time to review 1099:Same-sex marriage in the United States 806: 224:Or, you can do regular font, italic – 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2218:. Have you thought about attempting? 1807:My point was that your statement (in 7: 2220:If i managed it once then anyone can 2021: 1324:you. Sorry for the inconvenience. ~ 2099:Family Research Council's talk page 827:email button i have because of you 2436:A Barnstar for your quick work on 322:Very nice!! I like this one -: --> 24: 2987:needs to be set of, resulting in 2939:"maryland marriage referendum" = 1956:under the appropriate section. ~ 1741:You might want to take a look at 1409:Hi. I'm expanding the article at 2446: 2213: 2022: 1795:The paragraph reads as follows: 807: 29: 2843:maryland marriage referendum = 2808:"marriage referendum" maryland 2701:) 14:16 31 October 2012 (UTC) 2574:? Any comments on the article 2431:11:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 2377:14:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 2344:13:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 2313:21:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 2294:18:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 2267:18:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 2243:16:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 778:Nope... still doesn't work =P 1: 3059:Could you give your opinion? 3041:13:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 3010:08:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2198:22:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2170:21:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1563:Same-sex marriage in Maryland 552:I like this one Teammm -: --> 3069:19:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2977:19:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2903:18:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2888:18:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2824:18:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2801:18:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2782:16:31, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2757:06:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2734:02:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2679:15:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 2644:15:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 2622:02:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 2588:01:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 2560:20:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC) 2532:17:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC) 2507:20:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC) 2950:I don't see what you mean. 2763:"Emphasizes the notability" 2476:23:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC) 2138:01:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 2106:01:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 2080:01:38, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 2052:01:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 2002:07:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 1979:22:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1948:22:01, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1919:21:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1901:21:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1868:20:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1846:14:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1784:12:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1770:12:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1755:13:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 1731:21:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 1703:21:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 1684:16:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC) 1092:Overstepping on "vandalism" 391:Yours look perfect bold! – 3084: 2323:Help with Vandalism Filter 2814:by better than 10 to 1. - 2452: 2298:Yeah, I know, but it was 1992:. Love, Light and Peace 1660:03:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1632:02:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1612:16:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 1579:17:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 1555:22:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1511:17:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1490:04:41, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 1457:04:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 1423:04:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 813: 2925:"maryland question 6" = 2576:The Way I See It (album) 1526:"leave me a new message" 1399:04:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 1371:18:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1347:07:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1319:07:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1286:07:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1265:22:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1235:22:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1217:21:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1189:21:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1158:13:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1140:06:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1111:06:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1084:23:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1059:22:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1027:22:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1002:22:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 973:22:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 946:22:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 911:21:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 882:21:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 851:21:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 799:21:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 773:21:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 716:21:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 681:21:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 633:20:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 603:20:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 548:20:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 515:19:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 480:19:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 450:19:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 415:19:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 379:18:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 248:17:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 154:17:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 125:16:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1708:Lol, you're welcome. ~ 1496:Anderson Cooper article 817:The Good Heart Barnstar 657:that is the problem. – 637:See if it's the length 2836:maryland question 6 = 2095: 1805: 919:The Amazing Spider-Man 2989:maryland "question 6" 2812:"Question 6" maryland 2456:The Citation Barnstar 2212:the way you're going 2094: 1467:better personally. ~ 42:of past discussions. 2991:The other search is 2910:From Google Search: 2828:From Google Search: 2419:opt-out instructions 2250:your comment removal 2208:You could get it to 2015:Thing is, though, a 1990:Talk:Andrew Sullivan 1986:Talk:Andrew Sullivan 1954:Talk:Andrew Sullivan 1907:Talk:Andrew Sullivan 1434:would be correct. ~ 1363:The Devil's Advocate 2401:fix with Dab solver 2300:removed by accident 2164:central scrutinizer 2132:central scrutinizer 1461:Although I do like 1353:Randi GA nomination 2409:• Join us at the 2248:Hi, Teammm. I saw 2110:remove this notice 2096: 829:whenever you like! 2481: 2480: 2414: 2389:Same-sex marriage 2221: 2204:Same-sex marriage 2048: 1357:I have started a 952:Assemble? Thanks 856: 855: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3075: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3022: 2975: 2974: 2971: 2958: 2886: 2885: 2882: 2869: 2759: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2715: 2677: 2676: 2673: 2660: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2603: 2558: 2557: 2554: 2543: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2490: 2450: 2443: 2442: 2404: 2397:check to confirm 2375: 2374: 2371: 2360: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2277: 2239: 2234: 2233: 2230: 2219: 2217: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2181: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2154: 2151: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2122: 2119: 2113: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2063: 2049: 2044: 2037: 2034: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1977: 1976: 1973: 1962: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1931: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1884: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1829: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1714: 1658: 1657: 1654: 1643: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1595: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1538: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1473: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1440: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1382: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1330: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1302: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1014: 997: 994: 991: 988: 985: 969: 964: 963: 960: 941: 938: 935: 932: 929: 907: 902: 901: 898: 877: 874: 871: 868: 865: 847: 842: 841: 838: 811: 804: 803: 795: 790: 789: 786: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 746: 741: 740: 737: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 676: 673: 670: 667: 664: 654: 649: 648: 645: 628: 625: 622: 619: 616: 596: 593: 590: 587: 584: 581: 578: 569: 564: 563: 560: 543: 540: 537: 534: 531: 508: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 475: 472: 469: 466: 463: 443: 440: 437: 434: 431: 428: 425: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 357: 354: 343: 337: 335: 332: 306: 300: 298: 295: 292: 279: 273: 271: 268: 265: 243: 240: 237: 234: 231: 209: 203: 201: 198: 195: 184: 178: 176: 173: 170: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 100: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:Teammm 3083: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3057: 3037: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3016: 2973: 2965: 2961: 2960: 2952: 2918:"question 6" = 2884: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2863: 2765: 2750: 2744: 2730: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2709: 2689: 2675: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2654: 2632: 2618: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2597: 2568: 2556: 2550: 2546: 2545: 2539: 2515: 2503: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2486: 2441: 2411:DPL WikiProject 2385: 2373: 2367: 2363: 2362: 2356: 2325: 2290: 2284: 2280: 2279: 2273: 2237: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2206: 2194: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2177: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2103: 2088: 2076: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2059: 2043: 2035: 2032: 2023: 2009: 1975: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1958: 1944: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1927: 1897: 1891: 1887: 1886: 1880: 1842: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1825: 1743:Andrew Sullivan 1739: 1737:Andrew Sullivan 1727: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1710: 1691: 1668: 1656: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1639: 1620: 1608: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1591: 1566: 1551: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1534: 1498: 1486: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1469: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1436: 1407: 1395: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1378: 1355: 1343: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1326: 1315: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1298: 1278:Ilovepinkyrings 1273: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1121: 1094: 1078: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1021: 1015: 1012: 1010: 995: 992: 989: 986: 983: 967: 961: 958: 956: 939: 936: 933: 930: 927: 905: 899: 896: 894: 875: 872: 869: 866: 863: 845: 839: 836: 834: 793: 787: 784: 782: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 744: 738: 735: 733: 728: 704: 701: 698: 695: 692: 689: 686: 674: 671: 668: 665: 662: 652: 646: 643: 641: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 591: 588: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 567: 561: 558: 556: 541: 538: 535: 532: 529: 503: 500: 497: 494: 491: 488: 485: 473: 470: 467: 464: 461: 438: 435: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 367: 364: 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 341: 333: 330: 327: 304: 296: 293: 290: 287: 277: 269: 266: 263: 260: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 207: 199: 196: 193: 190: 182: 174: 171: 168: 165: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 95: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3081: 3079: 3056: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3027: 3026: 2963: 2962: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2937: 2930: 2923: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2874: 2873: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2848: 2841: 2764: 2761: 2755:comment added 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2720: 2719: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2665: 2664: 2631: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2608: 2607: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2548: 2547: 2514: 2513:Username Stuff 2511: 2510: 2509: 2495: 2494: 2479: 2478: 2459: 2458: 2453: 2451: 2440: 2434: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2365: 2364: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2282: 2281: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2186: 2185: 2162: 2144: 2141: 2130: 2104:Message added 2102: 2089: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2068: 2067: 2038: 2008: 2005: 1982: 1981: 1967: 1966: 1950: 1936: 1935: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1889: 1888: 1854: 1834: 1833: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1719: 1718: 1690: 1687: 1667: 1666:Regnerus study 1664: 1663: 1662: 1648: 1647: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1600: 1599: 1565: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1543: 1542: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1478: 1477: 1464:channel ORANGE 1459: 1445: 1444: 1431:Channel Orange 1406: 1405:Channel Orange 1403: 1402: 1401: 1387: 1386: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1335: 1334: 1321: 1307: 1306: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1191: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 914: 913: 888: 854: 853: 820: 819: 814: 812: 802: 801: 727: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 635: 607: 606: 605: 522: 519: 518: 517: 454: 453: 452: 389: 388: 382: 381: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3080: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3052: 3042: 3036: 3034: 3033: 3023: 3021: 3020: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2972: 2970: 2969: 2959: 2957: 2956: 2949: 2942: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2928: 2924: 2921: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2883: 2881: 2880: 2870: 2868: 2867: 2860: 2853: 2849: 2846: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2770:WP:COMMONNAME 2762: 2760: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2741: 2735: 2729: 2727: 2726: 2716: 2714: 2713: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2686: 2680: 2674: 2672: 2671: 2661: 2659: 2658: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2629: 2623: 2617: 2615: 2614: 2604: 2602: 2601: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2565: 2561: 2555: 2553: 2544: 2542: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2512: 2508: 2502: 2500: 2491: 2489: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2468:Amadscientist 2465: 2464:Homosexuality 2461: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2449: 2444: 2439: 2438:Homosexuality 2435: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2382: 2378: 2372: 2370: 2361: 2359: 2353: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2328: 2322: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305:58.53.192.218 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2289: 2287: 2278: 2276: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2259:58.53.192.218 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2235: 2216: 2211: 2203: 2199: 2193: 2191: 2182: 2180: 2175:No. Sorry. ~ 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2165: 2161: 2155: 2153:green rosetta 2142: 2140: 2139: 2133: 2129: 2123: 2121:green rosetta 2111: 2107: 2100: 2093: 2085: 2081: 2075: 2073: 2064: 2062: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2040: 2039: 2031: 2018: 2014: 2006: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1980: 1974: 1972: 1963: 1961: 1955: 1951: 1949: 1943: 1941: 1932: 1930: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1896: 1894: 1885: 1883: 1877: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1841: 1839: 1830: 1828: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1804: 1802: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1747:MarkBernstein 1744: 1736: 1732: 1726: 1724: 1715: 1713: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1688: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1665: 1661: 1655: 1653: 1644: 1642: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1617: 1613: 1607: 1605: 1596: 1594: 1588: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1548: 1539: 1537: 1531: 1530:"New Section" 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1495: 1491: 1485: 1483: 1474: 1472: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1458: 1452: 1450: 1441: 1439: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1392: 1383: 1381: 1376:Thank you. ~ 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1352: 1348: 1342: 1340: 1331: 1329: 1322: 1320: 1314: 1312: 1303: 1301: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1270: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1091: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1034: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 976: 975: 974: 971: 970: 965: 950: 949: 948: 947: 944: 943: 942: 921: 920: 912: 909: 908: 903: 889: 886: 885: 884: 883: 880: 879: 878: 852: 849: 848: 843: 830: 826: 822: 821: 818: 815: 810: 805: 800: 797: 796: 791: 777: 776: 775: 774: 771: 770: 769: 748: 747: 742: 725: 717: 714: 713: 708: 707: 684: 683: 682: 679: 678: 677: 656: 655: 650: 636: 634: 631: 630: 629: 608: 604: 601: 600: 595: 594: 571: 570: 565: 551: 550: 549: 546: 545: 544: 523: 520: 516: 513: 512: 507: 506: 483: 482: 481: 478: 477: 476: 455: 451: 448: 447: 442: 441: 418: 417: 416: 413: 412: 411: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 377: 376: 371: 370: 347: 345: 344: 338: 336: 326: 321: 320: 309: 308: 307: 301: 299: 282: 281: 280: 274: 272: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 246: 245: 244: 223: 222: 211: 210: 204: 202: 186: 185: 179: 177: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 151: 150: 129: 128: 127: 126: 123: 122: 117: 116: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3058: 3031: 3030: 3018: 3017: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2967: 2966: 2954: 2953: 2940: 2933: 2926: 2920:3.69 million 2919: 2909: 2878: 2877: 2865: 2864: 2851: 2845:2.15 million 2844: 2837: 2827: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2786: 2785: 2766: 2745: 2742:THANKS A LOT 2724: 2723: 2711: 2710: 2693: 2690: 2669: 2668: 2656: 2655: 2636:Bmclaughlin9 2633: 2612: 2611: 2599: 2598: 2569: 2551: 2540: 2516: 2498: 2487: 2455: 2416: 2386: 2368: 2357: 2329: 2326: 2285: 2274: 2223: 2209: 2207: 2189: 2178: 2146: 2115: 2071: 2060: 2045: 2030: 2012: 2010: 1983: 1970: 1959: 1939: 1928: 1892: 1881: 1875: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1837: 1826: 1820: 1812: 1808: 1806: 1800: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1787: 1773: 1758: 1740: 1722: 1711: 1692: 1676:Bmclaughlin9 1669: 1651: 1640: 1621: 1603: 1592: 1567: 1546: 1535: 1529: 1525: 1499: 1481: 1470: 1463: 1462: 1448: 1437: 1430: 1429: 1408: 1390: 1379: 1356: 1338: 1327: 1310: 1299: 1274: 1245: 1242: 1223:WP:VANDALISM 1197: 1194: 1169: 1166: 1120: 1117: 1095: 1064: 1039: 1036: 1007: 982: 979: 953: 926: 923: 917: 915: 891: 860: 859: 857: 831: 828: 824: 816: 779: 751: 750: 730: 729: 726:Fixed it! :P 711: 688: 659: 658: 638: 611: 610: 598: 575: 553: 526: 525: 510: 487: 458: 457: 445: 422: 393: 392: 374: 351: 346: 339: 328: 324: 302: 288: 284: 275: 261: 258: 228: 227: 205: 191: 180: 166: 133: 132: 120: 97: 93: 65: 43: 37: 2838:373 million 2751:—Preceding 2630:date format 2566:FAC comment 2524:BlueStars83 2336:Riffraff913 1911:Nat Gertler 1561:GA try for 1227:Nat Gertler 1150:Nat Gertler 1103:Nat Gertler 36:This is an 2997:question 6 2985:question 6 2810:outstrips 2484:Thanks ~ 2421:. Thanks, 2352:Black Kite 2332:Val Kilmer 2108:. You can 1925:Hi Nat. ~ 1689:Thank you! 1411:my sandbox 1148:matter. -- 90:Darn You!! 2405:Read the 2222:. Thanks 2017:501(c)(4) 1695:Insomesia 1359:GA review 1271:Quiz Show 283:...or... 187:...or... 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3061:Ron 1987 2519:Jenova20 2143:your sig 2086:Talkback 1817:WP:UNDUE 1674:Thanks. 1587:New York 1528:link or 1293:reliable 2927:127,000 2852:811,000 2753:undated 2552:Message 2499:Message 2423:DPL bot 2369:Message 2286:Message 2254:WP:TALK 2190:Message 2072:Message 1971:Message 1940:Message 1893:Message 1876:notable 1838:Message 1723:Message 1652:Message 1604:Message 1547:Message 1522:WP:NPOV 1482:Message 1449:Message 1391:Message 1339:Message 1311:Message 39:archive 3019:Teammm 2955:Teammm 2941:45,300 2934:52,200 2866:Teammm 2712:Teammm 2657:Teammm 2600:Teammm 2541:Teammm 2488:Teammm 2393:Gallup 2358:Teammm 2275:Teammm 2179:Teammm 2160:(talk) 2150:little 2128:(talk) 2118:little 2061:Teammm 1960:Teammm 1929:Teammm 1882:Teammm 1827:Teammm 1712:Teammm 1641:Teammm 1618:RE: CO 1593:Teammm 1571:Naraht 1536:Teammm 1518:WP:BLP 1471:Teammm 1438:Teammm 1380:Teammm 1328:Teammm 1300:Teammm 1146:WP:AGF 3032:email 3002:Rrius 2968:email 2895:Rrius 2879:email 2816:Rrius 2793:Rrius 2774:Rrius 2725:email 2687:Reply 2670:email 2613:email 2580:Dan56 2033:Belch 1994:Oinky 1860:Oinky 1776:Oinky 1762:Oinky 1624:Dan56 1503:Druep 1415:Dan56 16:< 3065:talk 3006:talk 2943:hits 2936:hits 2929:hits 2922:hits 2899:talk 2854:hits 2847:hits 2840:hits 2820:talk 2797:talk 2778:talk 2748:talk 2699:talk 2640:talk 2584:talk 2572:here 2528:talk 2472:talk 2427:talk 2340:talk 2309:talk 2263:talk 2046:TALK 2036:fire 1998:talk 1915:talk 1864:talk 1809:bold 1780:talk 1766:talk 1751:talk 1699:talk 1680:talk 1628:talk 1589:. ~ 1575:talk 1520:and 1507:talk 1419:talk 1367:talk 1282:talk 1231:talk 1154:talk 1107:talk 2694:RAP 2407:FAQ 2007:HRC 825:new 3067:) 3008:) 2901:) 2822:) 2799:) 2780:) 2642:) 2586:) 2530:) 2474:) 2466:. 2429:) 2399:| 2342:) 2311:) 2265:) 2238:20 2232:va 2229:no 2227:Je 2225:ツ 2210:GA 2000:) 1917:) 1866:) 1782:) 1768:) 1753:) 1701:) 1682:) 1630:) 1577:) 1509:) 1421:) 1369:) 1284:) 1247:Te 1244:ツ 1233:) 1199:Te 1196:ツ 1171:Te 1168:ツ 1156:) 1122:Te 1119:ツ 1109:) 1079:20 1073:va 1070:no 1068:Je 1066:ツ 1041:Te 1038:ツ 1022:20 1016:va 1013:no 1011:Je 1009:ツ 984:Te 981:ツ 968:20 962:va 959:no 957:Je 955:ツ 928:Te 925:ツ 906:20 900:va 897:no 895:Je 893:ツ 864:Te 862:ツ 846:20 840:va 837:no 835:Je 833:ツ 794:20 788:va 785:no 783:Je 781:ツ 755:Te 753:ツ 749:– 745:20 739:va 736:no 734:Je 732:ツ 712:20 663:Te 661:ツ 653:20 647:va 644:no 642:Je 640:ツ 615:Te 613:ツ 599:20 568:20 562:va 559:no 557:Je 555:ツ 530:Te 528:ツ 511:20 462:Te 460:ツ 446:20 397:Te 395:ツ 375:20 342:20 334:va 331:no 329:Je 305:20 297:va 294:no 286:ツ 278:20 270:va 267:no 230:Te 226:ツ 208:20 200:va 197:no 189:ツ 183:20 175:va 172:no 136:Te 134:ツ 121:20 3063:( 3004:( 2897:( 2818:( 2795:( 2791:- 2776:( 2697:( 2638:( 2582:( 2526:( 2470:( 2425:( 2413:. 2395:( 2338:( 2307:( 2261:( 2101:. 2041:- 1996:( 1913:( 1862:( 1815:( 1803:" 1778:( 1764:( 1749:( 1697:( 1678:( 1626:( 1573:( 1505:( 1417:( 1365:( 1280:( 1259:m 1256:m 1253:m 1250:a 1229:( 1211:m 1208:m 1205:m 1202:a 1183:m 1180:m 1177:m 1174:a 1152:( 1134:m 1131:m 1128:m 1125:a 1105:( 1053:m 1050:m 1047:m 1044:a 996:m 993:m 990:m 987:a 940:m 937:m 934:m 931:a 876:m 873:m 870:m 867:a 767:m 764:m 761:m 758:a 705:a 702:v 699:o 696:n 693:e 690:J 675:m 672:m 669:m 666:a 627:m 624:m 621:m 618:a 592:a 589:v 586:o 583:n 580:e 577:J 542:m 539:m 536:m 533:a 504:a 501:v 498:o 495:n 492:e 489:J 474:m 471:m 468:m 465:a 439:a 436:v 433:o 430:n 427:e 424:J 409:m 406:m 403:m 400:a 368:a 365:v 362:o 359:n 356:e 353:J 325:ツ 291:e 289:J 264:e 262:J 242:m 239:m 236:m 233:a 194:e 192:J 169:e 167:J 148:m 145:m 142:m 139:a 114:a 111:v 108:o 105:n 102:e 99:J 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index