Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:TechnoBladeSPX

Source 📝

287: 44: 136:
do this again. And, if I do, well any admin can block me without question, and I won't appeal. I will also try never to create a different account which in any way is a case of Sockpuppetry. I am incredibly sorry everyone for abusively using multiple accounts. Sorry. Please unblock me. I will never,
311:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
141:
mistake. I would also like to point out that I have done 6 months (October 20th, 2020 - April 20th, 2021) without sockpuppetry and/or posting a single block evasion proccess message. Thank you for listening to me. I hope you unblock me. Thanks.
315:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
235:
I have just checked my talk page, and I wanted to say thank you, and yes, I will keep out of trouble. Also, as I said earlier above I would close the TechnoBladeSPX account, so can you unblock my
308: 168:. Please keep in mind that you'll probably be under more scrutiny as someone who was formerly blocked for using multiple accounts, so I strongly recommend you keep out of trouble. 189:
in particular, since you CU-blocked a stack of their accounts): a) thoughts on an SO unblock here? b) mind double-checking that "no socking" claim to the extent you're able?
298: 79: 128:. This is why I pledge (vow) to never repeat this mistake on abusively using multiple accounts. Apart from my other accounts, the account, 74: 333: 93: 302: 261: 194: 173: 51: 125: 236: 129: 31: 325: 293: 277: 257: 230: 205: 190: 169: 210:
Always fine with an SO unblock as long as you think everything is addressed. CU is coming back clear. --
253: 240: 143: 57: 320: 211: 165: 124:
Hello. As I have looked back on my past mistakes, I have realised my many mistakes on
219: 186: 338: 265: 248: 223: 198: 177: 151: 132:
has been different, and I believe you can say the same. I will try to
42: 309:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Darlin van der Werff
297:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
291:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
107: 103: 97: 88: 84: 70: 66: 62: 256:, sure, I will unblock that one and reblock this one. 164:
All right, I am unblocking you per your appeal under
50:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
26:I am shutting down this user and will only use my 23:This user is no longer active on Knowledge (XXG). 8: 299:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 7: 239:account, too? Thanks, and cheers. 14: 307:The article will be discussed at 285: 1: 54:, who accepted the request. 354: 339:17:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 152:15:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 301:or whether it should be 266:23:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC) 249:20:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC) 244: 224:00:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 199:19:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 178:01:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 147: 47: 94:change block settings 46: 294:Darlin van der Werff 278:Darlin van der Werff 237:WellThisIsTheReaper 130:WellThisIsTheReaper 32:WellThisIsTheReaper 185:Checkuser needed ( 166:the standard offer 48: 30:(and other) user, 258:GeneralNotability 231:GeneralNotability 222: 206:GeneralNotability 191:GeneralNotability 170:GeneralNotability 137:EVER repeat this 345: 336: 328: 289: 288: 234: 218: 216: 209: 113: 111: 100: 82: 80:deleted contribs 45: 20: 19: 353: 352: 348: 347: 346: 344: 343: 342: 332: 324: 318: 290: 286: 282: 228: 212: 203: 182: 181: 155: 101: 91: 77: 60: 43: 40: 24: 21: 17: 16: 12: 11: 5: 351: 349: 284: 283: 281: 276:Nomination of 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 254:TechnoBladeSPX 241:TechnoBladeSPX 226: 162: 144:TechnoBladeSPX 122: 118:Request reason 115: 58:TechnoBladeSPX 41: 39: 36: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 350: 341: 340: 337: 335: 329: 327: 322: 321:SportingFlyer 317: 313: 310: 304: 300: 296: 295: 279: 275: 267: 263: 259: 255: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 232: 227: 225: 221: 217: 215: 207: 202: 201: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 161: 159: 158:Accept reason 154: 153: 149: 145: 140: 135: 131: 127: 121: 119: 114: 109: 105: 99: 95: 90: 86: 81: 76: 72: 71:global blocks 68: 67:active blocks 64: 59: 55: 53: 52:administrator 38:Block Evasion 37: 35: 33: 29: 331: 323: 319: 314: 306: 292: 280:for deletion 213: 163: 157: 156: 138: 133: 126:Sockpuppetry 123: 117: 116: 89:creation log 56: 49: 27: 25: 85:filter log 104:checkuser 63:block log 220:(aka DQ) 187:AmandaNP 75:contribs 303:deleted 98:unblock 18:Retired 214:Amanda 139:measly 134:NEVER 262:talk 245:talk 195:talk 174:talk 148:talk 28:main 108:log 305:. 264:) 247:) 197:) 176:) 160:: 150:) 120:: 102:• 96:• 92:• 87:• 83:• 78:• 73:• 69:• 65:• 34:. 334:C 330:· 326:T 260:( 243:( 233:: 229:@ 208:: 204:@ 193:( 172:( 146:( 112:) 110:) 106:( 61:(

Index

WellThisIsTheReaper
administrator
TechnoBladeSPX
block log
active blocks
global blocks
contribs
deleted contribs
filter log
creation log
change block settings
unblock
checkuser
log
Sockpuppetry
WellThisIsTheReaper
TechnoBladeSPX
talk
15:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
the standard offer
GeneralNotability
talk
01:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
AmandaNP
GeneralNotability
talk
19:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
GeneralNotability
Amanda
(aka DQ)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.