User talk:ThomasO1989/Archive 2

4113:

the specific location you gave to find you are correct. However this is a major spoiler point I was very dissapointed to find out not through playing. I relaise its partly my fault for prematurely editing but was wondering if maybe next time you could be a little less specific for the sake of spoilers when editing video game material? Maybe just say "it's spoiler related, but it does take place in the US" or just "this is spoiler related". I was also wondering if perhaps this raises a bigger point overall if something like this which is spoiler related should even be included in the category section in the first place and would like to hear your thoughts? I see you specifically edit video game material, could this be brought up in any specific area on Knowledge (XXG) related to video game editing? Thanks for your time and look forward to hearing from you.

5262: 4139:. Basically it means that spoiler warnings in articles (and by extension, their edit histories) are unnecessary and it's up to the responsibility of the reader (and other editors) to avoid being spoiled. It also means that categories should not be excluded simply because it spoils something-- after all Knowledge (XXG) seeks to be comprehensive. I will not assume that other editors of the articles I work on are interested in avoiding spoilers, so I will not be modifying my edit summaries to be less "spoilery." As for your other question about discussing spoilers in general, you're welcome to bring it up at 4644:(video game) article. As the book’s author, I shouldn’t be the one to do it. Most recently, I was asked for secondary references to the book, which I provided as links (in boldface) in the Talk discussion. I’ve asked one other editor for an opinion as to whether the references are sufficient, but haven’t heard back. Would you mind reading the relevant Battletoads Talk discussion (it’s at the end as “Some Proposed Changes”) and give your opinion? I’d really appreciate it. 2549: 5581: 5370: 4032: 1564: 896: 4664: 5209: 184: 36: 5639: 4515: 3601:, you need to bring it up on the talk page and discuss with other editors instead of trying to force it into the article. It's how Knowledge (XXG) works. Even so, if "everyone knows that" then you should have no problem presenting reliable sources that back up that claim. Right now, it doesn't look like you have sources. "RE5 and RE6 aren't survivial horror so RE4 isn't either" is a conjecture and doesn't hold up. -- 4818: 3457: 3142: 5765: 5488: 5023: 4554: 4411: 4282: 408: 376: 3692: 282: 2846: 5165:, but I would like to ask for a specific request. The plot section is overly complicated and contains a lot of excessive detail, and it needs fixing. However, I can't really do a "simple copyediting" of this because I can't decipher it (I've never played the game). If you have, could you please task in shortening it? If you do, I'll do the development section while you're at it. 1821: 770: 1033: 354: 1758:. I thought it was inappropriate to immediately start criticizing the system in the first paragraph as was previously done. A week or so ago I moved some of the criticism down into the reception section and immediately started a discussion about it on the talk page. So far only one other user has joined the discussion. I was wondering if you could leave some input there. 1017: 230: 1912:. First, thanks for that. Secondly, can you let me know if you come across another variation of this "Jake Gantt" name? I forget his original name, but it was some sort of name with "Jake Gannt" in it; I warned him many times about adding hoax release dates and hoax game articles, and every time he refused to stop, leading me to indef block him. (Its typically the 206: 4834:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3475:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3160:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 99: 3730: 585: 330: 306: 5678: 256: 1000: 3807:

have looked for that 103rd level for 20 years. I remain convinced it is there so I honestly would like to know how and why you are so certain it isn't there. I actually asked Rare a long while back and all they said "most believe that the game ended at the 102nd level" they never flat out confirmed it.Don Barone

4112:

Apologies for my edit on this page. I didn't realise the games setting was made specific as I have not completed all the endings (and didn't realise the player was ever told). I had done some Google'ing before hand to see if it was based in the US, but nothing came up. Then after your edit I searched

1729:

I agree with everything you said. I've given him a final warning that basically, if he makes another single post related to his fan project, he will be blocked. So basically, just ignore him. Right now, as long as we don't respond, there are currently no more no more points for him to respond to, and

4240:

I'm assuming you're new to Knowledge (XXG), so first... Welcome! If you meant how I found your edits so fast, I have several pages on my watchlist, including the articles you touched. You can put any article in your watchlist and view any new edits that come in. You can also check all contributions

2377:

I am well aware of the circumstances surrounding your semi-retirement. As for the Sonic articles, sure. Mind you I have not played a single Sonic game, so I have little context on the subject. However, that should come as a great help in writing the articles for someone who is completely unfamiliar

2339:

Hi, Sergecross has posted on my talk that we should work on Sonic-related articles since we have the time. Also, I don't know if you are aware of this, but I had to take a two-month semi-retirement from August to October due to being subjected to personal abuse by disruptive editors such as Fladrif

1964:

Hi Thomas01989, lot of Sites(And Mynintendonews.com, witch i think that is very trusty site) i looked that image up and they clame that it an official box art but will we need a better quality for site that will get one soon? if so then i may(or if someone find a better one) can upload it and might

1694:

Okay, I see. So, it isn't spam (at least it looks that way), and I already pointed out that conversations like that aren't forum (cause I had one like that with Thomas above and he didn't remove it), so it must be soap. Now, I read soap and I really just don't get what they mean at all. Do you mind

1328:

I am sending this message to the users who I have closely collaborated with. I will be taking a temporary Wikibreak for at least 5-7 days to let off some steam and get myself reenergized. Some of the stress has got to me, so I think it's best if I should take a couple of days off. I also have final

1654:

He was already helping me before. We talked about on the Irc page about a week ago. I don't mind you saying that it cant go on main pages, but did you even wait to see if Soaps reaction was? He was already helping, so its not an advert, and considering the fact that you did not label my post about

3806:

Honestly just very curious why you think that what I suggested is in Donkey Kong 2 is so impossible. Why are you so sure that it ended at the 102nd level when we never get an asterisk denoting end of the game and we never really find the treasure. This is honestly not meant to be a spam message I

3332:

I'm mostly feeling frustrated over the Marcus Lindblom and EarthBound articles and towards Czar at the moment. I really don't think the articles are GA quality (at least not yet) and I don't think he'll listen much to the concerns I have about them nor will he easily welcome any new edits/changes

2707:

By "significant to the community", I mean it's achieved enough fame to have a fairly large following, like the Weighted Companion Cube or Geddan, when it wasn't meant to. I didn't mean "put every glitch" like it seems like (gotta work on being more specific), but just the notable glitches, Easter

3402:

As for development and fan translation, that's more debatable, but I still feel that they justify themselves. The development article spans decades, and ideally, Mother 3 should focus on the GBA version - discussing the N64 version's development in the article to a significant extent could prove

124:

article yet, though, to your credit, part of the reason I haven't is because a lot of it already looks pretty good as it is. I tend to specialize in getting articles from "unreadable mess" to "around B class", so, as far as doing what I typically do, you're doing great. (Though, if you aspire to

5737:

You claim "I wanted to just sort out the voice from the games" but put Marc Graue and Bob Sorenson under others. You've picked Bardakoff to be a sort of front-runner with Martinet, but Bardakoff has roles in the single digits and hasn't voiced Luigi in 20 years. My point is that your sorting is

5433:

Sure thing, I can do that. I can also go over the Gameplay section once or twice, review the references, and ensure that it's up to date. One suggestion I do have, is that we could potentially move the image in the Plot section to Gameplay, replacing the image that's there. Both images show the

5330:

Hello Thomas! I'm conducting a feature for the video games newsletter similar to that of a survey. I'm going to ask users their opinions on a specific matter and highlight unique and common answers to determine consensus on a subject. Your input would be very valuable, alongside others, to help

1540:

Uh, there's no Knowledge (XXG) policy that states that "only Admin should jump into conversations". Also, these aren't "PMs" - I assume that stands for "Private Message". These comments are all quite public, and people are free to jump in as they please. In general, you can request that certain

89:" and add your userboxes there! Please leave a message on my talk page after you have created the page so that I can take a look! Also, with the userboxes, you might like to split them into categories (eg. "Personal data", "WikiProjects", "Knowledge (XXG) and computing", etc.". Please click 4294:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3368:

Taking a break is good. Go ahead and do that. It should be normal, not something requiring a declaration or ritual. Don't take all of this too seriously, and maybe other people will chill out in the meantime as well. But if not, let us know if we can help. I just took a look at the

2815:

Took me some time to fisure out why my posts got deleted every time. It appears, you think it's distruptive and does not belong on "flappy bird" page. I personally don't get it. How is that not appropriate. The article doesn't say a word about what happened after the game was removed.

4423:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4185:

Aside from the fact you added text like "The No Item Challenge" without any description or context, and a random link to someone's YouTube video, lists of "challenges" are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Please refrain from adding this content to any article in the future.

3508:

i just wanted to say im sorry for causing you so much trouble on the virtual console page and i will be not editing anything on wikipedia ever again but if you want to send me a message on my notifications i will write you back :( nice taking to you hope you write me back.

5406:

I saw your edits to the gameplay, thank you for that. While you're at it, I would greatly appreciate a copyedit/shortening of the plot section, because I have not played the game and I believe I might misinterpret something. I have development and reception covered.

4997:

I am referring to when you shift the enemies such that the game says "Great lineup!" or "Perfect lineup!" It had been a few months since I last played, so I rechecked some videos and it found it boosts attack power instead. I went and corrected it in the article.

4388:

Hi there, I understood you for some reason have undid my edits on the sims games regarding ghosts. Ghosts are one of the many elements in the game and players can have fun making them. Therefore, they belong in this category as games featuring ghosts. Thank you.

3314:

What's got you discouraged? I hadn't passively noticed you having troubles. Anyways, sometimes a Wiki-break can be good, so I won't try to talk you out of it, but I do hope its a short term thing. You are a great editor who does a lot of good work on the project.

1518:

I am not saying this, because of who you are. Its just that only Admins and Moderators should jump into PMs. I appreciate the help, but I have had experiences with people who get quite irate over it. So, it might not be a good idea to do it with other people.

3399:. Honestly, I could reasonably see EarthBound fandom be a spark for other similar fandom articles being made. Team Fortress 2 has a ton of fan-made content and fandom (such as cosplaying), Pokemon definitely has enough content to make a fandom article, etc. 4967:

gameplay section. It's much more clear and concise, and will help players who have never played the game before understand the game, which is what the goal of the section is. It'll help during the GA review. However, could you clarify this sentence?

3948:

After a little over a year of editing the VLR article, I think it's ready for FAC. Just wanted to know if there was anything you'd still like to see fixed before I nominate it. Thanks for all the work you've put into the article, it really means a lot!

1676:

It doesn't matter, it does not belong on Knowledge (XXG) as long as it is not related to building/improving a Knowledge (XXG) article. Thomas was right to remove it. As I said before, exchange email addresses or meet up at a messageboard or something.

54:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

4753:

You did not provide any reliable sources that establish RiiConnect24's notability, just an external link to the service itself. Whether or not it's "helpful to Wii owners" isn't relevant here. Your opinion alone does not make something notable.

3351:

Yeah, I'm puzzled that Czar would attempt to create those articles after all his efforts to merge Tezero's spinoff articles. I'm trying to stay out of those discussions though, I'm already embroiled in a few policy-enforcing debates as it is...

3221:

I'm on mobile so I can't be too wordy, but I trust you know who I am referring to (see my action log: blocks); for anything else please post on my talkpage or e-mail me so I can block quicker. Tonight I'll run around and SPP a few more targets.

2618:

thats not how it works, the edit was in itself related to chrisgualtieri aswell....per status quo, you would have to keep it the original format before chris edited. Theres a reason why chris got topic banned aswell. you could be seen as a meat

2044:

What happened was that I used the Visual Editor to add info about the Wii Mini US release date, and included a reference, which caused the bottom section of the page to die! Totally unexpected. Not gonna use the Visual Editor anymore.

125:

bring it to GA class, it might be good to get another set of eyes, since I don't usually take it that far. Anyways, just thought I'd throw that out there. It's on my watchlist so I'll still help keep and eye and help if/when I can too.

849:

Yeah, I know, I really shouldn't waste so much time on arguing with her - consensus almost always moves against her far before I stop arguing with her. I don't have any plans on arguing it any further unless something new develops.

3403:

disruptive. The fan translation has a bit weaker a rationale to it, but it definitely received non-trivial coverage wherein the subject of the coverage was the translation as much, if not more, than the game being translated. -

3995:? It's very close to being promoted, and the coordinator asked to confirm if you're happy with everything being addressed. I'm anxious to get this closed as I have another article on hold which is pretty much FA-ready. Thanks! 2396:), and just the general overlap between Nintendo fans (a big area of work for you) and Sonic fans. But anyways, yeah, that's great if you want to help, it'll be good to get the perspective from someone who doesn't play them. 1129: 800:

Hi Thomas. Just wanted to make sure you knew that, despite Lucia's commentary, I do actually appreciate your commentary on my talk page. I like it when users chime in on my talk page. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

5810: 5531: 5066: 4597: 4451: 4322: 3623:

I've been trying to have a consensus with an i.p on Bowser's Talk page, so far I can't handle it on my own. Do you think you can participate and/or get others more common in this to join if it's alright with you?

1329:

exams coming up as well, so I have more important things to worry about. I, however, will be here to contribute to some articles that I have worked on. Until then, farewell. With my very best and warmest regards,

3992: 818:

Hey, just wanted to thank you for your help in this area again. Those arguments get pretty out of control, so I really do appreciate it when you brave it and leave a comment in the midst of all of it. Thank you.

3906:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1698:

Also, if I am wrong about soap (and right about the other two) then I suppose a bit of "subject prejudice*" is the cause, and while that may sound bad, I don't mind (as long as you tell me so I don't annoy you)

5738:

arbitrary and having separate lists for English and Japanese actors is more readable. It's the format that video game characters already use, and you haven't given a good reason why this sorting is better. --

1148: 4483:

Hi Thomas, I remember you reporting the user from serge, the name goes to FireStorm or FireThunder for block evasion or sock. well i think this user i mentioned is back and uploading unrecognizable images.

3018:

Sorry, but your interpretation is wrong. Name calling, threats, that sort of thing, are a personal attack. Simple observations on one's editing, especially the one in question, are not personal attacks.

1143: 968:

Hi, ThomasO1989. While I am working on Sonic Adventure, Sonic Adventure 2 and Sonic Shuffle, I was wondering what would be some good sources (i.e. magazines or articles) to use for the articles? Thanks,

595:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is

2120:, though I'm not entirely sure its necessary there either. There's a million Xbox One preview type articles out there. Not sure this one stands out as far as needing to be the one put in the article... 1405:

You reverted my edit saying "Not a forum." The question I asked was about a sentence in the article itself. "Not a forum" means no general talk about the article's subject independent of the article.

5794:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5515:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5050:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4581:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4435:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4306:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5588: 5377: 4071: 4050: 3582:

Dude stop bloody reverting my edits! RE5&6 aren't classified as "Survival horror"so why should RE4 be classified as such? its the game which changed RE series from survival horror to Action..

2582:

I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Knowledge (XXG) together! Keep rocking on! :)

1134: 835:

No problem. She's obviously not going to listen to anything you or I say, so I think at this point it's best to stay out of further discussions at WP:VILLAGE and silently watch from a distance. --

2348: 2116:

are only used to back up information in the article. Its not the way to just randomly dump links into the articles. If it really needs to be in the article, it should probably be added as an

1268: 1250: 5464:, where I have raised a discussion regarding the inclusion of "U R MR GAY" with reliable sources. As you have made significant contributions to the article, your perspective seems relevant. 1927:, and some Blues Cluse/Winx Club nonsense. Since I know you at least contribute to those first two, let me know if you see him again, and I'll block him for block evasion/vandalism. Thanks! 5779: 5501: 5036: 4567: 5690: 1028: 1020: 736: 2077:

I added a link to an article about Xbox One to the Knowledge (XXG) page and it was dumped. Not a problem but would you mind referencing it then? It does apply to the subject matter.

1420:

The sentence I was discussing was in the article, and I was merely asking about when the sentence was going to need to be updated. Thus, the question relates to the article itself.

2209:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —

1264: 1246: 516:

No offence, but why did you revert my picture on the Mii page? If you didn't want a QR code picture or it violated a fair use rule, well, ok, but if not, why did you undo my post?

5850:

Hello :) from San Diego, here just a tad few more clear sunny days than or vs the grey awash squatted for 330 days each calendar year over Vestal NY hehe. How are things? -From

1235: 1024: 1259: 1217: 1608:

I have no personal issue with joining messages, but some people do, and I have actually had people chew me out over this. I am just giving advice to help prevent conflicts.

626: 142:

Okay no problem, I read the guidelines and didn't realize the site I added from could be considered promotion of the person in question. I'll be more weary of that now.

5261: 5336:

How do you determine what makes a video game character notable enough for their own page? Do you follow pre-existing guidelines or have your own opinions on the matter?

1226: 3555:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 3391:

Just wanted to chime in and say that I think that EarthBound fandom definitely warrants its own article, as it really is its own thing (kind of like a cult version of

2671:"Significant to the community" usually isn't the measure we go by at Knowledge (XXG), that can be hard to measure. Generally, something like this would be included if 2640:

True, glitches aren't important to gameplay, but they're still significant in the community, so they deserve some mention. I'm working on finding references for them.

1577: 913: 2204: 1231: 2294: 1280: 1255: 1213: 740: 681:

It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

3054: 1998:. There's no editorial staff, and no history of editorial oversight or reliability. (I've come across many examples where their info is wrong or poorly written.) 1864: 2873:

She might have to be reported, she's beginning to become disruptive, this was one of the reasons why she was banned off of Kirby Wikia, she wouldn't listen. --

1365: 3050: 1860: 3754: 2297:. Are you sure the Giygas has those kinds of traps that where those characters could get their skin ripped off or burnt by them? I found it at his site over 5125: 3064: 2443: 2165: 1874: 1375: 1361: 1222: 642:

discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

4793:

has a good, lengthy list of what Knowledge (XXG) (or at least the Video Games WikiProject) considers reliable or unreliable if you want to check it out. --

2293:

I wanted to let you know that the Giygas isn't really an alien, but it's a ghost boss in Earthbound series and it has the traps from Midknight's stage in

597: 592: 392: 3413: 158: 2301:. You just need to test that character on M.U.G.E.N and find out if the Giygas has those kind of death traps including the one's from doom and others.-- 5722:

considered unconstructive. I wanted to just sort out the voice from the games before chronologically listing the others by date rather than language.

4845: 3610: 3486: 3171: 1183: 774: 4826: 2196: 1598: 946: 939: 1448:

You mean, the talk pages are not only not forums for general opinions, but also not for premature thoughts on what the articles should say soon??

4527:

For your continuous work cleaning up and maintaining Nintendo articles, particularly by frequently reverting vandalism and other unwanted edits.

2041:

Hey, yeah I know about the Wii page break. I was actually reverting it when I got an edit collision because you were doing it at the same time.

3867:

So yeah, sorry about that. Been getting carried away with free images in a lot of the other articles I work on, so I figured one extra image in

3548: 2433: 2743:

Sorry, I'm new to editing on Knowledge (XXG) and I didn't realize you had written on my Talk page, so I re-posted that list of courses on the

2155: 5121: 3060: 2439: 2367: 2161: 1870: 1837: 1371: 1338: 1192: 978: 786: 570: 5686: 5670: 2429: 5833: 5702: 5554: 5088: 4619: 4465: 4336: 4094: 3931: 3559:

and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my

3099: 2251: 2151: 1179: 989: 3369:

aforementioned diff, and I don't any way for me to write it better than it is, but I just thought I'd let you know that I took a look. —

5615: 5399: 4491: 2351:) and Bambifan101, as well as issues in real life. However, I decided that I will no longer let past issues get to me anymore for good. 4640:

We have a lengthy discussion going concerning whether a mention of the official guide to the Battletoads games can be inserted in the

4046: 3524: 1496: 5682: 3433:. Could you explain your thoughts in some more detail, because I don't think I'm getting the whole picture from your edit summaries? 4373: 3215: 3193:

I meant to say that the plot is about 200 words too long (not 20). The average length should be 400-700. This one is over 900 now.

2800: 2726: 2654: 4102: 675: 434: 4877:

will ping the user in question that you've mentioned them. When asking for reviews of possible socks, you may instead want to use

2908: 1188: 5901:

Yes. Without a doubt. I had suspected them to be a sock for a long time but the additional edits to Times Square Ball seals it.

3000: 5829: 5550: 5084: 4921: 4615: 4461: 4332: 3927: 3552: 1919:

Anyways, he continue to make alt accounts that contain his name, and continue to do make up information in articles related to

5803: 5524: 5059: 4590: 4444: 4315: 3337:

so to prevent myself from doing/saying something stupid I'm taking a break. But thank you, I highly appreciate the concern. --

3057:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2436:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2200: 2158:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1867:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1368:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 722: 3823: 3629: 2878: 2763: 2016: 1966: 154: 4830:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3837: 3641: 3471:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3156:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2977: 2777: 2666: 1989: 91: 4768:

Okay. Thanks for the info. So in this case, is a "reliable source" any reputable, non-wiki site not run by RiiConnect24? --

3871:

wouldn't hurt. I agree that the image should aid the reader's understanding. If only we could get an image of Uchikoshi...

2492:

No, wikis can't be used on Knowledge (XXG). They can be edited by anyone at any point, so they aren't considered reliable.

945:

As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so

5864: 4963: 4955: 2096: 1090: 481: 4835: 4708: 3476: 3161: 2306: 1711: 1662: 1615: 1594: 1570: 1563: 1526: 467:

Hey @CURTAINTOAD how about a user box for, This user wishes they had hair hehe just joshing about myself. Cheers. -From

3918:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1800:

Sorry. Im new. Understood. Also, thanks for clarifacation on reverting pic reference. Wondered why that kept happening.

1074: 5815: 5536: 5071: 4602: 4456: 4327: 3923: 2227: 2061: 1715: 1666: 1619: 1530: 419: 387: 3408: 3374: 3041:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2420:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2142:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1851:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1352:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4971:

The player is awarded additional attacks in a single turn if all enemies had been moved to the optimal solution.

3625: 2874: 1492: 4359: 86: 5699: 4974:

What does this mean? I've 100% the game, and don't remember anything like this happening. Could you clarify?

4641: 4098: 3668:

You are doing absolutely nothing to help me understand what you think I am doing wrong. USE YOUR WORDS PLEASE.

3404: 3103: 1779:

I would like to know why you deleted my Speacial Characters section that I just spent AN HOUR ON! -Justaguy120

1765: 150: 5791: 5512: 5047: 4731:

Just curious why you reverted my RiiConnect24 edit? IMO, it's notable, and certainly helpful to Wii owners. --

4578: 4432: 4303: 3467: 3152: 2255: 1102: 5691:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Super Mario USA(Japan)/Super Mario Bros.2(West)

5619: 5455: 4677: 4495: 4394: 4265: 4223: 4206: 4168: 4093:...or I may have to report you. Main composers only to be listed in the info box please. As per guidelines. 2302: 2231: 1707: 1658: 1611: 1590: 1522: 1201: 5115: 4909: 4487: 3811: 3512: 2896: 2751: 2084: 2049: 2026: 1976: 1586: 146: 5890: 5600: 5389: 4079: 4062: 3958: 3848: 3789: 3652: 3520: 3358: 3321: 3121: 3042: 3025: 2988: 2747:

page. Is there a place I should put it, or is it better off on another wiki (like the Super Mario Wiki)?

2709: 2697: 2498: 2402: 2126: 2004: 1933: 1852: 1789: 1736: 1683: 1639: 1551: 872: 856: 825: 807: 131: 3919: 3594: 2783: 1761: 664: 5928: 5906: 5743: 5439: 5003: 4944: 4798: 4773: 4759: 4736: 4673: 4390: 4368: 4354: 4261: 4250: 4235: 4219: 4202: 4191: 4180: 4164: 4148: 3976: 3954: 3876: 3606: 3342: 3299: 3257: 2794: 2720: 2648: 2624: 2383: 2325: 2278: 1949: 1805: 1703:

Subject Prejudice-calling a subject spam, trolling, etc. becuase you do not personally like the subject.

1453: 1439: 1425: 1410: 1353: 840: 639: 17: 5306: 3516: 2688: 2683:

did an article on it. And if it was to be included, it would just be a small, short mention, as to not

692: 530:

Ok, thanks for telling me why you removed it. Would it be allowed to use a QR code of a different Mii?

51: 5693:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

4784: 4769: 4748: 4732: 5106:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4532: 3706:

Awarded for mentoring a new user and setting a fine example through even handed edits and discussion

3588: 3556: 3233: 3179: 2904: 2320:

it was bold. don't revert on whats already reverted, or you will be the cause of an edit war. not me.

1504: 1500: 1049: 5773: 5495: 5408: 5340: 5030: 4645: 4561: 4419: 4290: 4136: 4130: 4114: 3895: 3886: 2392:

Oh wow, I hadn't realized that. I had assumed you had, since we've worked on some in the past (like

2265:

Yes, I've noticed. I left one warning on his talk page. He appears to be editing articles involving

558: 554: 5920: 5916: 5694: 5656: 5469: 5294: 5244: 5191: 5174: 4980: 4917: 4716: 4697: 4649: 4118: 3202: 2856: 2822: 2755: 2266: 1312: 715: 60: 5884:? The completely irrelevant edit summaries at Nintendo related articles seems vaguely familiar... 5787: 5508: 5043: 4574: 4428: 4299: 3915: 3899: 2088: 5727: 5460: 3819: 3711: 3568: 3560: 3377: 2933: 2925: 2826: 2759: 2363: 2020: 1970: 1833: 1825: 1334: 1197: 974: 924: 902: 895: 782: 566: 535: 521: 5580: 5369: 4031: 3597:

that RE4 is classified as "Horror survival", and you are editing against consensus. As at least

2684: 1096: 1080: 1068: 1062: 739:, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located 500:? I've seen lots of people endorsing their own views on RfCs, as can be seen in sections above. 2548: 1655:

jumping into conversations FORUM, that means that the only issue is a simple miscommunication.

5885: 5860: 5596: 5418: 5385: 5350: 5320:

Note: This is not me spamming your talk page three times in a row. Just wishing you a good one

5223: 5161: 5152: 5141: 5107: 4075: 4058: 4049:, for service over 10 years and "I'd particularly love to give a shout-out ...", - you are an 3843: 3785: 3734: 3673: 3647: 3544: 3494: 3353: 3316: 3277: 3116: 3080: 3020: 3008: 2983: 2965: 2692: 2493: 2459: 2397: 2355: 2181: 2121: 2092: 1999: 1928: 1890: 1784: 1731: 1678: 1634: 1546: 1391: 954: 867: 851: 820: 802: 549:

Hello. Just in case you aren't aware, I've started a discussion regarding the recent edits to

477: 126: 5799: 5520: 5055: 4790: 4586: 4440: 4311: 3911: 3903: 2298: 1434:

The sentence will need improvement when there's official info on the answer to the question.

764:

Discussion at Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games#Possible ban discussion on Niemti?

700: 696: 5924: 5902: 5822: 5739: 5543: 5435: 5078: 4999: 4940: 4892: 4794: 4755: 4609: 4477: 4363: 4246: 4242: 4187: 4144: 4038: 4004: 3972: 3966: 3950: 3872: 3759: 3602: 3396: 3392: 3338: 3295: 3253: 2957: 2950: 2942: 2788: 2714: 2642: 2620: 2379: 2321: 2274: 2270: 1945: 1801: 1449: 1435: 1421: 1406: 836: 504: 455: 441: 337: 313: 104: 69: 44: 5881: 5802:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5795: 5523:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5516: 5208: 5058:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5051: 4589:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4582: 4443:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4436: 4314:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4307: 4260:

Ok thank for telling and yes I'm new to wikipedia (I did use it without an account before)

3914:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3907: 3741:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2113: 708: 183: 4881: 4853: 4528: 3247: 3225: 3175: 2900: 2529: 2514: 2481: 2247: 2223: 2057: 652:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about

4831: 4140: 3472: 3157: 2819:

I will gladly apologize for inconvinience, when and if you makee your point about this.

2708:

eggs, etc that show up. Also, if you wanna follow it, this conversation is continuing in

2672: 2117: 2109: 1995: 711:. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. 668: 5276:

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

5118:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2078: 1495:. The article is currently under review for Good article status. If you are interested, 591:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

5932: 5910: 5895: 5870: 5837: 5747: 5731: 5706: 5660: 5652: 5638: 5623: 5604: 5558: 5473: 5465: 5443: 5420: 5393: 5352: 5314:

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

5286: 5246: 5236: 5193: 5183: 5176: 5166: 5145: 5092: 5007: 4992: 4984: 4975: 4948: 4934: 4925: 4913: 4896: 4857: 4802: 4777: 4763: 4740: 4720: 4712: 4701: 4693: 4681: 4663: 4653: 4623: 4536: 4514: 4499: 4469: 4398: 4378: 4340: 4269: 4254: 4227: 4210: 4195: 4172: 4152: 4122: 4083: 4066: 4012: 3980: 3935: 3880: 3853: 3827: 3793: 3777: 3746: 3715: 3677: 3657: 3633: 3572: 3528: 3498: 3444: 3417: 3381: 3363: 3346: 3326: 3303: 3281: 3261: 3239: 3209: 3194: 3183: 3126: 3107: 3084: 3030: 3012: 2993: 2969: 2937: 2912: 2882: 2860: 2852: 2830: 2804: 2767: 2730: 2702: 2658: 2634: 2628: 2592: 2533: 2518: 2503: 2485: 2463: 2407: 2387: 2371: 2329: 2310: 2282: 2259: 2236: 2185: 2131: 2100: 2065: 2030: 2009: 1980: 1953: 1938: 1894: 1841: 1809: 1794: 1769: 1741: 1719: 1688: 1670: 1644: 1623: 1602: 1556: 1534: 1508: 1481: 1477: 1457: 1443: 1429: 1414: 1395: 1342: 1318: 1304: 982: 958: 928: 909: 877: 861: 844: 830: 812: 790: 758: 753: 574: 539: 525: 506: 487: 461: 447: 162: 136: 110: 75: 35: 5434:

battle screen, but the Plot one has more "going on" and shows the audience feature. --

5723: 5132: