279:
forgotten to remove the AfC tag from the bottom), and my decision was that the easiest way for those issues to get sorted was to send it back for review. The article was never deleted – the redirect left being from me moving to back to draftspace was. I apologise if that was confusing. You're very welcome to move the page back to mainspace, but you may wish to get some further feedback about the title and exact scope so that it works in unison with other related articles. Sorry for the confusion.
31:
396:
278:
and is possibly a candidate for merging with other related articles. AfC article creators often do weird things and move articles to mainspace accidentally, so I think I assumed that that was the case in this instance. Your article came up in a category for misplaced AfC submissions (as you had
247:
Hi TheDragonFire, I noticed that you had very recently moved my article title "Criminal
Remedies for Copyright Infringement" to the draft articles namespace. I had initially drafted the article and had submitted the same for review but I decided to incorporate the article as a finalised article
248:
anyway. Is there a reason you had moved it back into the draft articles namespace? I had ensured that the article met all the creation guidelines of
Knowledge. Subsequently, another editor deleted the article altogether. Can you let me know what I ought to do about this? Thanks.
326:, which you proposed for deletion, as the article now includes one or more sources. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion with a regular
611:
607:
636:
Hey! I was literally just thinking about checking on IRC what the established consensus on this was, but I got a little carried away. Good to know, and I'll back off to only commenting when absolutely necessary.
302:
606:
Hi TheDragonFire, I just wanted to let you know that there were discussions a while ago about non-admin clerking at AIV and the consensus was pretty strongly against it (see
425:
template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the
160:) have been clearly demarcated. They were already present, but it seems that this was overlooked due to incorrect formatting and was henceforth corrected for ease of usage.
271:
441:
241:
177:
Would you please look once more at the page and see if the changes are sufficient? Any further suggestions for editing would be greatly appreciated.
465:
163:
As an update, the additions of 'Research' and 'Current appointments' along with their academic sites and
Knowledge page links have been included.
552:
437:
579:. The administrator's responding to the report are more than capable of determining who is at fault and responding accordingly.
504:
358:
337:
145:
Regarding the page "Nadir Gohari" the links to academic sources have been established in a clearer and more coherent matter.
385:
113:, I don't seem to have come across that before and it looks far easier to remember than a lot of the other policy pages.
653:
595:
534:
508:
477:
461:
377:
295:
234:
129:
426:
38:
274:. I moved it back to draft space because – while being extensive and decently written – it seemed to have an odd
556:
436:
If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the
253:
642:
584:
567:
I have made no comment on the content of your revertions, simply that are well and truly in violation of of
523:
366:
284:
223:
156:"Nadir+Gohari"). The citations also have been clearly formatted and academic publishers, such as Routledge (
118:
47:
17:
446:
265:
249:
430:
109:
That's fair. I always blank on the fact that significance can be inherited. Thanks for pointing me to
619:
548:
323:
306:
646:
623:
588:
560:
527:
512:
500:
471:
370:
351:
288:
257:
227:
212:
191:
172:
122:
96:
68:
61:
545:
So you think it's ok to remove citations? And edit warring is fine if you're a registered user?
136:
638:
580:
519:
362:
280:
219:
199:
183:
164:
114:
316:
204:
Without reviewing the article a lot more, I don't know if the changes are sufficient to meet
346:
187:
168:
631:
615:
402:
275:
90:
576:
492:
453:
414:
110:
78:
74:
67:
Hello TheDragonFire. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
572:
568:
420:
330:
153:
341:
205:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
104:
85:
71:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
149:
148:
The selected bibliography includes sources found on Google
Scholar (
73:
Being part of a notable entity indicates importance/significance (
390:
25:
491:. It is to make their addition easier in the future. Best
157:
489:
614:). You should probably just stick to reporting users.
518:
All good. I think I removed them mostly out of habit.
488:
Please do not remove these that I have restored here
456:by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message
154:https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=
8:
401:You can view the full list of stub types at
242:Criminal Remedies for Copyright Infringement
546:
433:to identify articles that need expansion.
361:, but I'm not going to do that right now.
357:Thanks! The article may need to go to
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
413:I noticed you marked an article as a
150:https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=
7:
410:Hello TheDragonFire/Archives/2017,
386:Geisha Natalie Montes de Oca Robles
208:, but I think it's enough to avoid
158:https://en.wikipedia.org/Routledge
24:
575:was incorrect, so I moved it to
394:
29:
338:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
440:WikiProject, and hundreds of
654:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
596:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
535:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
478:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
378:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
296:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
235:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
152:"Nadir+Gohari") and books (
130:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
670:
452:If you reply here, please
60:Speedy deletion declined:
429:because it helps various
647:14:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
624:14:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
589:09:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
561:08:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
528:01:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
513:22:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
472:08:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
371:13:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
352:21:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
289:15:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
258:14:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
228:15:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
192:17:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
173:19:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
123:11:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
97:11:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
18:User talk:TheDragonFire
359:articles for deletion
270:The article is right
42:of past discussions.
427:Knowledge community
312:I have removed the
577:the correct venue
563:
551:comment added by
447:I dream of horses
408:
407:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
661:
635:
571:. The report to
497:
469:
458:
457:
449:
424:
398:
397:
391:
384:Stub sorting at
335:
329:
321:
315:
269:
217:
211:
203:
108:
93:
88:
33:
32:
26:
669:
668:
664:
663:
662:
660:
659:
658:
629:
604:
543:
493:
486:
459:
451:
450:
445:
418:
395:
389:
350:
333:
327:
324:Sancar Seçkiner
319:
313:
310:
307:Sancar Seçkiner
263:
245:
215:
209:
197:
140:
102:
91:
86:
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
667:
665:
650:
649:
603:
600:
592:
591:
553:109.180.164.43
542:
539:
531:
530:
485:
484:Extra headings
482:
406:
405:
399:
388:
382:
374:
373:
344:
309:
300:
292:
291:
266:TheMayFlower17
250:TheMayFlower17
244:
239:
231:
230:
139:
134:
126:
125:
64:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
666:
657:
655:
648:
644:
640:
639:TheDragonFire
633:
628:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
601:
599:
597:
590:
586:
582:
581:TheDragonFire
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
540:
538:
536:
529:
525:
521:
520:TheDragonFire
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
496:
490:
483:
481:
479:
474:
473:
467:
463:
455:
448:
444:. Thanks! --
443:
439:
434:
432:
428:
422:
416:
411:
404:
400:
393:
392:
387:
383:
381:
379:
372:
368:
364:
363:TheDragonFire
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
348:
343:
339:
332:
325:
318:
308:
304:
301:
299:
297:
290:
286:
282:
281:TheDragonFire
277:
273:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
243:
240:
238:
236:
229:
225:
221:
220:TheDragonFire
214:
207:
201:
196:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
174:
170:
166:
161:
159:
155:
151:
146:
143:
138:
135:
133:
131:
124:
120:
116:
115:TheDragonFire
112:
106:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
94:
89:
82:
80:
76:
70:
69:FMB INSURANCE
63:
62:FMB INSURANCE
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
651:
605:
593:
547:— Preceding
544:
541:Edit warring
532:
494:
487:
475:
442:stub sorters
438:stub sorting
435:
431:WikiProjects
412:
409:
375:
311:
293:
246:
232:
182:
179:
176:
162:
147:
144:
141:
137:Nadir Gohari
127:
84:
83:Thank you.
75:WP:CCSI#CORP
72:
66:
55:
43:
37:
340:. Thanks!
180:Thank you.
79:WP:CCSI#ORG
36:This is an
632:Sarahj2107
616:Sarahj2107
462:talk to me
417:using the
303:Deprodding
213:notability
495:Doc James
322:tag from
218:tagging.
549:unsigned
505:contribs
466:My edits
403:WP:STUBS
317:prod blp
454:ping me
336:or via
142:Hello,
111:WP:CCSI
39:archive
573:WP:ANI
569:WP:3RR
342:clpo13
200:Lyonex
184:Lyonex
165:Lyonex
509:email
276:scope
105:SoWhy
16:<
643:talk
620:talk
612:here
610:and
608:here
585:talk
557:talk
524:talk
501:talk
421:stub
415:stub
367:talk
347:talk
331:prod
285:talk
272:here
254:talk
224:talk
206:WP:N
188:talk
169:talk
119:talk
656:}}
602:AIV
598:}}
537:}}
480:}}
470:@
464:) (
380:}}
305:of
298:}}
237:}}
132:}}
92:Why
652:{{
645:)
622:)
594:{{
587:)
559:)
533:{{
526:)
511:)
507:·
503:·
476:{{
423:}}
419:{{
376:{{
369:)
334:}}
328:{{
320:}}
314:{{
294:{{
287:)
256:)
233:{{
226:)
216:}}
210:{{
190:)
171:)
128:{{
121:)
87:So
81:).
77:,
641:(
634::
630:@
618:(
583:(
555:(
522:(
499:(
468:)
460:(
365:(
349:)
345:(
283:(
268::
264:@
252:(
222:(
202::
198:@
186:(
167:(
117:(
107::
103:@
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.