732:
information, both about notability and in general, to non-familiar individuals who are seeking further information about a topic. Now, I'm not saying this has to be worded 'It is notable because' but it should have some clear indication of just what is so special about the topic. The article when it was tagged and deleted had no content to suggest it was any more notable then the shed at the bottom of my garden in my view, and that was why I nominated the article for deletion. The fact that an admin deleted the article (and more to the point, still stands by his original decision despite the article being restored), to me, validates my claim the the article
559:, name-call and quote mere essays all you want, it won't change how I decide to handle my nominations. Unless of course common courtesy is now a wiki policy. When you get right down to it, past the bad-faith name-chucking by two recent editors to this page, the only issue here is that I didn't warn someone about tagging a page for deletion, meaning they were unaware of the pages subsequent deletion. Oh my god. Call the wikipolice, lock me up and throw away the key.
46:
80:
1709:
194:
spam as apposed to anything else on wikipedia. Do i have to be someone that hates the organization in order for my article to be received? The article was no more or less partial then almost any other article on wikipedia. Do you actually have any criteria or do you just sort of randomly select what you think you like or not? Also what credentials is required to be on the article selection team?
21:
121:
keeping both articles, but I must insist that the claims of creating the
Silicium escapement wheel stop. There are multiple readily available sources of other companies who also make the same claim, and theirs goes back further than 21 days, such as this one. More are available on demand. Is this acceptable? The Kinslayer 18:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1852:
My name is David
Kildare manager of The Fabs and Fabiola Gatti. I read that you have been instrumental in removing Fabiola from Wilkipedia. It may be true that the information 1st rendered to Wilkipedia was poorly written and we would like the opportunity to rewrite this information, but it appears
1349:
Bowsy and I fully understand anything we put on a page, and read it before we do so. We are not the idiots you're suggesting we are. Stop it. Also, why did you mention Bowsy on the npa template, that was me and me alone so stop dragging him into it. And what did you mean by all the dust we're kicking
1029:
I have no idea how this is supposed to enlighten me. Quoting random scripture at me isn't going to achieve anything, and even in the context of the link it only seems to be guidelines on valid reason for staring a delete review which I, as someone who has never started one, find highly irrelevent to
670:
The administrator who deleted the article has told me that the present version does assert the notability and the one he deleted did not. Just what assertion of notability he thinks is in the present article that was not in the one he deleted I can't guess and I've asked him to explain it. However
1556:
I am an undergrad at UC Berkeley and am doing this as part of my senior thesis in sociology. I have an e-mail correspondence with Jimbo Wales and would be happy to forward it to you if that is necessary. I understand that you are doing your job but just judging by the content of my submitted page I
1074:
about 3rr and
Sockpuppetry. The sockpuppetry vis a vis my IP address was essentially inadvertent and the user:YLH shall not be using this computer again. Furthermore I am operating under one account which is this one. In addition to all of this my accuser kjartan8 was found to be a sockpuppet of
237:
I felt you were a bit quick to delete numerous entries in this page. I refer in particular to the
Ireland section which was deleted in it's entirety. While citations may not have been forthcoming all of the instances are well known either in local or national folklore. Perhaps you could allow more
193:
why was my article deleted it makes absolutely no sense. The comment said something like it was spam, but i am not working for the company but am a subscriber. If I am a subscribe to the magazine that i wrote a wikipedia article for is it therefore not allowed. What made the article that i created
120:
I agree that those sources do prove you and your companies notability, but the picture your showing us is a computer generated image? What the heck is that supposed to prove? Your company can produce an image using a computer? Well done. Moving on, I suggest a compromise. I'll change my opinion to
1190:
Please note that users have the right to remove warning messages from their talk pages. The warning messages I removed were made to restore the user's talk page to the condition in which that user had last left it. In short, I was reverting edits made by someone trying to enforce a non-existant
282:
I want to put the tactics section back in. You took this out citing NOR and the Wiki is not a game guide. I dispute this. There are no articles on the web describing the game to the extent the wiki does, so all the material on that page is in that sense OR; it's not quoted from elsewhere. The
438:
Some of them have been AfD'ed, but others remain.I suggest in the strongest terms that these articles be deleted immediately. The references cited in Direct Action Day by this editor are falsely represented by him and not in the citations given (I am well-familiar with them). In contrast, he has
264:
A) 7 days prior notice was given. B) The entries were unsourced, and the list is now zero-tolerance for unsourced entries and C) They wern't even deleted. All the entries (as stated on the talk page you obviously haven't read) have been moved to a sub-page where they can be recovered from easily
1413:
I wasn't even talking about you. Who ARE you? I was talking to someone who has repeatedly been changing various bands genres based on what he thinks they should be. I suggested if he wanted to change the genre he should initiate discussion on each bands talk page. Instead he went round and just
648:
deletion in topics for which you have no first-hand way of assessing notability, at least not before consulting people who do. Based on your explanation, I think I put "how I see fit" exactly in the proper context. Your going about your tagging "how you see fit", with or without warning, puts
554:
Your taking 'how I see fit' out of context. I meant I will continue warning (or not warning) users about deletion tags as I see fit. Nothing more. Ansd a slight correction, I am not 'defending to the death' anything. I'm not on trial here. I was merely clearing up the rather fuzzy logic used by
1172:
an internet link directory. The site provides no inforamtion used in the article and is therefore of no benefit. The blacklisting is just to stop fanboys adding the link again every other day. But I'm not bothered, I can revert them any day of the week while I'm supposed to be working instead.
1040:
In fact, after a second reading I am now clear that you have referred me to something completely non-sensical, as it is indeed just describing the only reasons that are considered valid for calling a review, and none of it is relevent to anything I said in that review. I did note this sentence
675:, had asked anyone actually familiar with the topic, they'd have found an assertion of its notability that could then have been added to the article. It still looks to me as if Kinslayer was simply rushing into things he did not know enough about to judge, and he should have realized that.
512:
consider warning' which is how it is on the speedy tag and means it is a voluntary action to take, and 'You MUST warn', which would make it an enforced policy (which it isn't.) I sometime warn people and sometimes I don't warn people and will continue to do it how I see fit for the near and
731:
I still dispute this. The article did NOT assert the notability of the IMA. As has been said, it's very much likely someone familiar with it would have known it's notability, but they would not have known it's notability from reading the article. The point of an encyclopedia is to provide
1459:
Sorry about the first of two edits there - I have not played either of the games, but going off Boll's past adaptations, I just automatically assumed that it would be a "loose" adaptation. Just thought I'd mention that it wasn't a bad faith edit on my part, or anything like that. :)
1853:
that her name is somehow blocked. If you are in any doubt about
Fabiola Gatti's credentials to be included, just google her name. My email is kildare@fabsmusic.co.uk and I would grateful be very much obliged if you would take a moment to reply. Thank you in anticipation.
1433:
Actually, after reading your comment, there may be some confusion. The proposal mentions all poll-like and consensus gathering. You seemed concerned that they would be allowed on drv in the same debates. This is not the case. I take responsibility, I use XfD as shorthand :)
572:
Can some one point me to the discussion about this deletion? All I could find was the admin action with something like "nn-institution". It sounds to me like none asked a mathematician if it was notable. Although name-calling is not appropriate, it seems at the very least
485:
OK, you spend your time editing things about punk rock guitarists, doom metal bands, disk jockeys, and then you say an article on a major research institute should be speedily deleted as something unimportant? Knowledge is supposed to be for people who know how to read.
169:
Just back from Japan and see that you have not replied to above. Feb. 22 you proposed compromise to keep both articles when we stop claiming that we created silicium escapement wheel. Believe I have done so in draft article and asked you feedback. Hope you can answer
507:
comment). And one admin agreed the IMA was unimportant. Have you accused the deleting admin of vandalism yet? (Ah, I see you have. Well, at least your misguided zeal is consistent.) Yes I didn't warn you. I didn't have to warn you. There is a difference between 'You
644:) instead of appealing to rational principles of common courtesy. No, it's not policy. That's not the point. It doesn't have to be policy to be the right thing to do. I am asking you (also a common courtesy) to refrain in the future from tagging an article for
1242:
Save it for the commitee. I don't care and personally think wikipedia would be better off if you two were banned. Hey Bowsy, I see from your talk page you accused someone else of something you knew f**k all about. Your not making many friends are you?
1792:
639:
I really don't understand the need for all the sarcasm. This is an important issue. And don't confuse me with
Michael Hardy; I did not engage in name-calling. I am pointing out that you are following the letter of the law (one of the points in
297:
Thanks for your help on my recent edit. You're right I didn't mean to delete material. I got a bit confused with the codes being there and that is what I deleted, thinking it was unnecessary/typos. These codes are harder than I thought. Whoops!
1232:
I posted it on Hench's page so that it wouldn't seem supicious to the WP community when he stopped mentioning my name. I also did it so, if necessary, I could show users who comment negatively on this that I don't like it. Hope you understand.
1542:
Call me cynical, but I don't believe you. Still we can follow the standard procedures and see wont we, because if this has indeed been sanctioned by Jimbo Wales, I'm sure it will be made known when an admin comes to delete the article.
159:
Please see my talk page where I have placed a draft for two articles. Can I ask your assistance to check. Once you agree, I would like to ask if you can re-create deleted articles to avoid I make another mistake. Thank you in advance.
649:
people out unnecessarily. Look, I'll leave you alone now. I'm really not trying to put you on trial, as your defensiveness and sarcasm seem to indicate. I'm just trying to see to it that everyone have a positive experience here.
542:
went too far in the words he chose, but you have now told the mathematics community that "how you see fit" supersedes our collective understanding about the notability of an institution. How about taking the high road next time?
717:
The bottom line here is that IMA is notable and should not have been deleted. We all make mistakes, the important thing is to learn from them. No one is suggesting you be locked up, just that you try to be more careful. Regards,
124:
For the record, as far as I know, following brands have introduced or announced silicium parts for watch calibers: Patek
Philippe, Brequet, Ulysse Nardin and Frederique Constant. Please let me know if you have found more.
764:
is the version that was speedied. The only possibly notable part is the affiliation with the
University, but that alone is not notable. Many things are associated with colleges and universities, but they are only
1895:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1685:
for the slime spin-off series of the franchise. There are currently not enough people involved to actually reach a clear consensus, so you are invited to read the discussion (or have a look, if it's too long)
773:. The article gave no indication that any such sources had taken note of the institute. A stub needs to have some kind of source beyond an official website in most cases to lay the groundwork for notability.
1387:
for people who are merely trying to make the
Knowledge better. Third, the genre was not changed. The genre stayed exactly as it was. What I changed was the definition that "Later works" encompass only
147:
to me as a Dutch, meant that we developped and produced such wheel. The picture was only intended to show a screendump from our CAD CAM system showing this part (the FC Silicium
Escapement Wheel).
1677:
Hello, since you occasionally edit video games articles, I thought I'd inform you of a debate currently taking place in the WikiProject Dragon Quest. It is about whether we should use the name
1097:
I will leave the page till (our) morning. (I am in NZ) If you don't like it then delete it (but do a goole search first please). If you are happy then i will remove the db corp in the morning.
728:
P.S. Speaking of mistakes, sorry about my previous edit, which inadvertently deleted some comments by others, I was accidentally editing a previous version of your talk page. Again sorry.
283:
page describes the game and the material that was removed describes part of the games behaviour just as much as (for example) describing that other countries can go to war by themselves.
809:
Contrary to my previous estimate of you as being unjustifiably partial for some reason, I must however rescind my earlier comments to you and admit that I was wrong in the said estimate.
618:
Actually Leebo, he's right. In one post he's managed to completely unearth my conspiracy to eradicate mathematics from the earth, starting right here with wikipedia. AHAHAHAHAHAA ahem.
338:
668:
It has NEVER been a widespread practice for Knowledge articles to say "This subject is notable because..." in language that would be understood by persons unfamiliar with the subject.
106:
102:
98:
1580:
Again, I'll reiterate my disbelief that you have received any word from Jimbo about this article specifically. Even if Jimbo sanctioned it, it clearly is not acceptable based on our
1414:
changed each bands genre. This had nothing to do with you and still doesn't. I'm sorry if I inadvertantly caught one of your edits in a revert, but that's all it was, inadvertant.
1379:
Do you realise that I am an administrator and have been part of the project for three years? I don't think you do. Foremost, do not attack users needlessly and keep your cool, see
1282:
I said that because I thought you had because you did so in the past, but you didn't. I am very sorry for saying that about you when you hadn't done it. Please accept my apology.
1943:
1584:. As such, that would make Jimbo wrong and the community (editors like Kinslayer and me) can overrule such a decision. Jimbo can't arbitrarily allow articles that break policy.
1938:
666:
Well, I'm surprised to see that Kinslayer is arguing the issue instead of simply telling us all where to go, since his actions in this matter did appear to be in bad faith.
503:
You'd have thought someone who has been around for a while such as yourself would know by now that only Admins deleted articles (This is especially amusing in light of your
1627:
as it seems to offer sufficient context to be understandable and could possibly be improved to become a decent article. Let me know if you disagree with this. Cheers, --
1360:
I don't have to make you seem like idiots. Your doing fine by yourselves. Any further direct communication from you two will be reported as harrassment. Good day.
1222:
At that point we were using two different computers, I told real life Bowsy that that conversation wasn't necessary but he wouldn't listen. WE ARE NOT PUPPETS!!!
470:
1252:
Oh, you mean sockpuppetry? If you are mentioned as someone's sock on their page, why wouldn't you accuse them. Plus they have had some similarities in the past.
341:
They were removed due to a lack of sources for them, but you are more than welcome to re-introduce them to the article if you can find reliable souces to cite.
577:
you have some agenda for deleting articles that is not compatible with the writing of a good quality encyclopedia. Please be more careful in the future.
1763:
to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with
1747:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
276:
139:
Above is not intended to have another heated discussion on what we claim. I fully follow and agree with you that we should not claim that we were the
1138:, and want to get the site blacklisted? It seems a rather good site to me, with lots of relevant info. I don't know if it has comparable status with
534:
So because the tag says "should" you defend to the death your decision not to warn? How about applying the principles of common courtesy instead of
1399:
is a gothic metal album or rather some crossover of gothic metal. Either way, do not accuse me of being a vandal. If you want to discuss this in a
1106:
913:
815:
390:
359:
244:
1261:
Wrong. Try a different issue people have taken up with you on your talk page. Guess you got more than one group of irate people to choose from.
1752:
686:
210:
1517:
Dear Kinslayer, I apologize for the confusion. I was given prior approval for this social-concept experiment. It is fully within propriety.
356:
My sources seem to be accurate, so why delete the article? I could change some things in it, but if you'll delete it, at least tell me why?
1920:
917:
819:
86:
1499:
because it was actually G4 - that failed an AfD previously. More likely to be a no-brainer for the admin to decide if it stays or goes. —
1168:(this is important, becuase as a fan site it cannot be considered independent of it's subject, it's inherrently biased) media sources and
1429:(copied over cause I realize there may be a misunderstanding :)) Fair enough. I'll go with that. The Kinslayer 16:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
855:
597:
of the institution is justified. Anyone may place such a tag if notability is not asserted. It's not an "agenda", it's deletion policy.
418:
Hi, I saw your edits to issues related to Teabing-Leigh and would like to get your attention to a matter of serious misrepresentation:
35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
1687:
248:
1323:
There is absolutely no reason to keep the article, as I have explained on the article, none of the reasons for keeping it are valid.
1860:
1691:
94:
1470:
Yeah, it's cool. It could well be 'loosely adapted', but based on what I've seen of the trailers so far it actually seems to have
1728:
1648:
I added a section about the rhyme's use in World War II and a reference for it. That should assist with notability concerns too.
1916:
1756:
1732:
1164:
It provides no information that isn't already available directly from primary sources for describing the game or from reliable
1835:
839:
Honestly, why? The Cock-a-doodle Fetus article does not need to be deleted. They are an important piece of American history.
874:
I have blocked Euroskate 714 as being a disruption only account. It is best not to respond to insults with insults thought.
402:
371:
328:
27:
812:
As someone who does not understand Knowledge policies a lot, I'd like help and guidance to improve my articles on here.
1572:
1533:
1304:
1118:
1907:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1912:
1724:
1659:
1595:
784:
608:
241:
Besides, they are ghosts, is it not a bit ironic that you are deleting them out of suspicion that they don't exist?!?
1557:
am not doing vandalism or disrupting Knowledge in anyway. Thank you for your time and I apologize for the confusion.
1205:
OK... I see it has disappeared not to worry, interesting experience. Any pointers to how to make it more acceptable?
1053:
think this deletion review is about? Procedural correctness, or some people being unhappy their article was deleted?
72:
to leave a message. Any replies to messages on the talk page will be on my talk page to avoid fractured conversations
555:
Michael Hardy (You tagged the article for deletion, The article was deleted, ergo, you deleted the article.) As for
136:) with a silicium escapement wheel. I do not yet have any feedback that others will have similar in nearby future.
1300:
983:
1827:
1736:
1637:
689:: "A town of 300 people: no problem; a minor sports figure: no problem; a major mathematics institute: kill it."
206:
921:
823:
910:
Kindly have a look and see objectively if this meets the criteria now with all the changes and the additions.
312:
Hi... Think you could add places from Ireland? Far as I'm concerned, the castle ghosts there are numerous....
980:
851:
936:
896:
641:
556:
535:
1864:
1008:
You may have been abusing the DRV process for List of Mario Party minigames. Please read this extract of
421:
252:
202:
1015:
This page is about process, not about content, although in some cases it may involve reviewing content.
847:
749:
722:
284:
1744:
1856:
1560:
1521:
1314:
843:
316:
198:
1908:
1760:
1461:
1377:
Reverting vandalism. I said discuss, not unilaterlally edit the pages to suit your perceived genre.
299:
58:
1743:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
1720:
79:
1774:
1767:
1564:
1544:
1525:
1475:
1415:
1361:
1351:
1324:
1262:
1244:
1223:
1209:
1184:
1174:
1110:
1081:
1054:
1031:
994:
945:
865:
737:
699:
690:
676:
619:
574:
560:
539:
514:
487:
474:
342:
266:
220:
52:
1884:
1875:
1617:
1333:
1308:
398:
367:
324:
1904:
1888:
1831:
1581:
1568:
1529:
1501:
1493:
1442:
1388:
1307:. I think the page about the league should be kept but the individual team pages created by
1114:
1045:
This process should not be used simply because you disagree with a deletion debate's outcome
971:
948:
925:
746:
719:
650:
544:
424:
45:
1903:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1656:
1592:
1383:. Second, do not impose what you perceive as correct and do not order other editors, have
1380:
1155:
780:
604:
174:
1727:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
1078:
Given these issues and more, I require your help in the clearing of sockpuppet charges.
1900:
1892:
1839:
1811:
1748:
1624:
1404:
907:... I have since then made an effort to finish these two things from the said article.
900:
672:
1932:
1896:
1716:
1633:
1453:
1192:
1169:
1071:
1009:
959:
904:
876:
587:
578:
456:
1708:
1695:
770:
394:
363:
320:
1019:
As you can see, saying that the content was unacceptable doesn't fly during DRVs.
962:
and do not assume that my motives are for the sake of that. It could not be for:
1823:
1807:
1436:
1403:
manner, do contact me and explain what you perceive as wrong in what I said. --
766:
593:
439:
removed numerous references that did, in fact, exist before that were reliable.
180:
161:
151:
1791:
150:
Meanwhile, both articles are deleted. Do you have a suggestion how to proceed?
1649:
1585:
1392:
1283:
1253:
1234:
1020:
774:
598:
20:
976:
Making sure Dōbutsu no Mori remains at there until there IS an official title
473:
when you decided to delete it? Your deletion of that article was vandalism.
1924:
1868:
1842:
1814:
1777:
1698:
1666:
1642:
1602:
1547:
1507:
1478:
1464:
1446:
1418:
1407:
1364:
1354:
1336:
1327:
1317:
1286:
1265:
1256:
1247:
1237:
1226:
1212:
1195:
1177:
1158:
1122:
1084:
1057:
1049:
which seems far more relevent to the review in hand. I ask you, what do you
1034:
1023:
997:
986:
967:
882:
868:
827:
789:
752:
740:
725:
702:
693:
679:
653:
622:
613:
581:
563:
547:
517:
490:
477:
459:
406:
375:
345:
302:
287:
269:
256:
223:
183:
164:
154:
1628:
443:
132:(core collection retail Euro 500-5000) that produces its own movement (a
451:
Is an Afrocentric pseudohistory website with no mainstream credibility.
513:
not-so-near future. Any other wikipedia issues you'd like clarifying?
422:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Muslim_League%27s_Civil_Disobedience_Movement
433:
1891:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
538:? And about "how you see fit": why the attitude? I agree that
469:
Is there a reason why you did not notify people who had edited
143:
to come with a silicium escapement wheel. As mentioned before,
62:
and will be back on Knowledge when he damn well feels like it!
40:
15:
505:'Knowledge is supposed to be for people who know how to read'
1806:
Just wanted to say thanks for your work protecting WP from
1751:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
1707:
935:
I request that you kindly close debate and remove tags from
425:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Muslim_League%27s_Direct_Action_Day
1739:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
1810:'s articles promoting his watch company and himself. --
993:
I removed it as soon as I had posted didn't I? Back off.
337:
At the moment, all the removed entries have been stored
761:
69:
1075:
hkelkar and was banned indefinitely from Knowledge.
117:
Just back after trip and I see your last statement:
1103:PS I am sure it will get expanded on in due course
736:failed to establish the notability of the subject.
128:Frederique Constant is the only watch brand in the
1731:, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
1694:and give your opinion on the question. Thank you!
1883:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1723:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
939:, if indeed you are satisfied with the outcome.
1070:If you recall a case was launched against me by
471:Institute for Mathematics and its Applications
1299:I saw that you put a speedy deletion for the
448:cited by him across these numerous articles,
8:
1944:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages
1939:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
1154:games, but I think it's a relevant link. —
671:if either Kinslayer or that administrator,
1719:}} template has been added to the article
1789:
745:Which part of my comment do you dispute?
434:http://en.wikipedia.org/Direct_Action_Day
277:Conflict:_Middle_East_Political_Simulator
31:. The Kinslayer has not edited Knowledge
864:Yeah, if your retarded, or in the band.
387:Where can I download this, by the way?
1834:. Would welcome your comments on the
1673:Debate in the WikiProject Dragon Quest
687:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
444:http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html
7:
769:if they have been written about in
14:
1909:review the candidates' statements
1375:Are you kidding me? Quoting you:
265:should sources for them turn up.
28:This user may have left Knowledge
1790:
895:Since you nominated the article
107:/Archive 4 09/02/07 - 13/03/2007
103:/Archive 3 24/01/07 - 09/02/2007
99:/Archive 2 28/11/06 - 17/01/2007
78:
44:
19:
1830:, and merging what's left into
1345:Stop making us seem like idiots
1134:Why did you remove the link to
590:tag on an article that did not
586:The Kinslayer's placement of a
1915:. For the Election committee,
1885:Arbitration Committee election
1876:ArbCom elections are now open!
1575:) 19:57, April 10, 2007 (UTC)
1:
1925:16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1822:I am advocating editing down
1759:, where it may be deleted if
1301:Online Basketball Association
1292:Online Basketball Association
887:
442:In particular, this website:
238:time for citation in future.
230:Re: list of haunted locations
1843:16:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1815:16:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
1778:16:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
1911:and submit your choices on
1869:13:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
1737:Knowledge's deletion policy
1679:Slime MoriMori Dragon Quest
1303:. I left an opinion in the
455:Thanks for your attention.
1960:
1917:MediaWiki message delivery
1667:12:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
1643:12:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
1603:20:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1548:19:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1508:14:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1479:11:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1474:story than the game does!
1465:10:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
926:15:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
883:14:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
869:14:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
828:14:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
790:15:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
753:16:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
741:15:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
726:05:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
703:09:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
694:22:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
680:22:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
654:00:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
623:16:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
614:16:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
582:16:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
564:15:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
548:15:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
518:07:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
491:02:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
478:02:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
460:12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
407:11:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
376:11:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
346:14:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
303:22:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
288:18:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
270:09:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
257:22:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
224:16:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
165:12:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
155:11:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
1828:Silicium escapement wheel
1796:
1749:proposed deletion process
1447:18:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
1419:15:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
1408:15:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
1365:08:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
1355:18:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1337:16:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1328:11:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1318:11:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1287:10:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1266:10:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1257:10:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1248:08:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1238:08:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1227:08:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1213:02:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
1196:15:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1178:10:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1159:10:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1123:10:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1085:06:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1058:22:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
1035:22:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
1024:17:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
998:22:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
987:17:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
949:06:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
184:08:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1783:Thanks for Silicium work
1753:speedy deletion criteria
835:Why are you such a dick?
1699:08:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
1582:policies and guidelines
427:(presently redirected)
1848:Fabiola Gatti deletion
1826:'s remaining article,
1729:criteria for inclusion
1712:
1218:Re: Your comment on AN
1017:
937:Gandhi's views on race
897:Gandhi's views on race
888:Gandhi's views on race
698:Well if you insist...
430:are both POV forks of
1889:Arbitration Committee
1800:The Editor's Barnstar
1757:Articles for Deletion
1755:or it can be sent to
1733:What Knowledge is not
1711:
1563:comment was added by
1109:comment was added by
1013:
916:comment was added by
818:comment was added by
771:reliable publications
734:as it was at the time
393:comment was added by
383:Middle East Simulator
362:comment was added by
247:comment was added by
1030:anything I've said.
1893:arbitration process
1683:Dragon Quest Heroes
1063:Sockpuppet issue...
954:Naming conventions.
134:Manufacture Caliber
1905:arbitration policy
1713:
1623:tag from the page
1613:Hi, I removed the
1371:Theatre of Tragedy
1311:should be deleted.
1185:User talk:Janeybee
1140:No Mutants Allowed
981:A Link to the Past
575:User:The_Kinslayer
540:User:Michael Hardy
56:is taking a short
1859:comment added by
1820:
1819:
1725:proposed deletion
1663:
1641:
1599:
1576:
1538:
1524:comment added by
1444:
1126:
942:Yours sincerely,
929:
881:
860:
846:comment added by
831:
782:
606:
410:
379:
333:
319:comment added by
260:
215:
201:comment added by
66:
65:
39:
38:
1951:
1871:
1832:Lever escapement
1794:
1787:
1786:
1772:
1766:
1742:
1664:
1661:
1653:
1631:
1622:
1616:
1600:
1597:
1589:
1558:
1537:
1518:
1506:
1504:
1498:
1492:
1441:
1439:
1389:Industrial metal
1104:
1067:Dear Kinslayer,
972:Shunkan Puzzloop
932:Dear Kinslayer,
911:
892:Dear Kinslayer,
875:
859:
840:
813:
787:
779:
642:WP:Wikilawyering
611:
603:
557:WP:Wikilawyering
536:WP:Wikilawyering
388:
357:
332:
313:
242:
214:
195:
179:
173:
113:Deleted articles
82:
48:
41:
23:
16:
1959:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1929:
1928:
1913:the voting page
1879:
1854:
1850:
1785:
1770:
1764:
1740:
1706:
1675:
1660:
1651:
1620:
1614:
1611:
1596:
1587:
1559:—The preceding
1519:
1515:
1502:
1500:
1496:
1490:
1489:I removed your
1487:
1457:
1437:
1427:
1373:
1347:
1315:DCUnitedFan2011
1294:
1280:
1220:
1203:
1188:
1136:Project Manhunt
1132:
1130:Project Manhunt
1105:—The preceding
1092:
1065:
1006:
956:
912:—The preceding
890:
879:
841:
837:
814:—The preceding
804:
785:
609:
588:speedy deletion
467:
416:
389:—The preceding
385:
358:—The preceding
354:
314:
310:
295:
280:
243:—The preceding
232:
203:Virgilisleading
196:
191:
177:
171:
115:
110:
91:
33:since July 2007
12:
11:
5:
1957:
1955:
1947:
1946:
1941:
1931:
1930:
1882:
1878:
1873:
1849:
1846:
1818:
1817:
1803:
1802:
1797:
1795:
1784:
1781:
1741:{{dated prod}}
1705:
1702:
1674:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1625:A Wise Old Owl
1610:
1609:A Wise Old Owl
1607:
1606:
1605:
1551:
1550:
1514:
1511:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1462:Dreaded Walrus
1456:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1313:
1312:
1293:
1290:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1219:
1216:
1208:Cheers Andrew
1202:
1199:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1131:
1128:
1100:Thanks Andrew
1091:
1088:
1064:
1061:
1038:
1037:
1010:WP:DRV#Purpose
1005:
1002:
1001:
1000:
990:
989:
979:And others. -
977:
974:
970:isn't move to
955:
952:
918:202.163.67.241
889:
886:
877:
872:
871:
836:
833:
820:202.163.67.241
803:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
708:
707:
706:
705:
665:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
552:
551:
550:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
496:
495:
494:
493:
466:
463:
454:
415:
412:
384:
381:
353:
352:Shade (Undead)
350:
349:
348:
309:
308:Haunted Places
306:
294:
291:
279:
274:
273:
272:
231:
228:
227:
226:
190:
187:
130:Middle Segment
114:
111:
105:
101:
97:
92:
83:
77:
76:
74:The Kinslayer
73:
64:
63:
49:
37:
36:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1956:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1936:
1934:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1782:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1775:B. Wolterding
1769:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1745:its talk page
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1710:
1703:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1684:
1680:
1672:
1668:
1665:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1626:
1619:
1608:
1604:
1601:
1593:
1591:
1590:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1554:
1549:
1546:
1545:The Kinslayer
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1513:Knowledge Man
1512:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1495:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1476:The Kinslayer
1473:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1463:
1455:
1454:Postal (film)
1452:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1424:
1420:
1417:
1416:The Kinslayer
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1362:The Kinslayer
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1352:Henchman 2000
1344:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1325:The Kinslayer
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1291:
1289:
1288:
1285:
1277:
1267:
1264:
1263:The Kinslayer
1260:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1245:The Kinslayer
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1225:
1224:Henchman 2000
1217:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1206:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1175:The Kinslayer
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1094:Hi Kinslayer
1089:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1082:Teabing-Leigh
1079:
1076:
1073:
1072:user:kjartan8
1068:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1055:The Kinslayer
1052:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1036:
1033:
1032:The Kinslayer
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1003:
999:
996:
995:The Kinslayer
992:
991:
988:
985:
982:
978:
975:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
961:
953:
951:
950:
947:
946:Teabing-Leigh
943:
940:
938:
933:
930:
927:
923:
919:
915:
908:
906:
902:
898:
893:
885:
884:
880:
870:
867:
866:The Kinslayer
863:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:Euroskate 714
845:
834:
832:
829:
825:
821:
817:
810:
807:
801:
791:
788:
781:
778:
777:
772:
768:
763:
760:
754:
751:
748:
744:
743:
742:
739:
738:The Kinslayer
735:
730:
729:
727:
724:
721:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
704:
701:
700:The Kinslayer
697:
696:
695:
692:
691:Michael Hardy
688:
684:
683:
682:
681:
678:
677:Michael Hardy
674:
669:
655:
652:
647:
643:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
624:
621:
620:The Kinslayer
617:
616:
615:
612:
605:
602:
601:
596:
595:
589:
585:
584:
583:
580:
576:
571:
565:
562:
561:The Kinslayer
558:
553:
549:
546:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
519:
516:
515:The Kinslayer
511:
506:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
492:
489:
488:Michael Hardy
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
475:Michael Hardy
472:
464:
462:
461:
458:
452:
449:
446:
445:
440:
436:
435:
431:
428:
426:
423:
419:
413:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
382:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
351:
347:
344:
343:The Kinslayer
340:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
307:
305:
304:
301:
292:
290:
289:
286:
285:Toby Douglass
278:
275:
271:
268:
267:The Kinslayer
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
239:
235:
229:
225:
222:
221:The Kinslayer
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
188:
186:
185:
182:
176:
167:
166:
163:
157:
156:
153:
148:
146:
142:
137:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
112:
109:
108:
104:
100:
96:
90:
89:
88:
81:
75:
71:
61:
60:
55:
54:
53:The Kinslayer
50:
47:
43:
42:
34:
30:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1880:
1851:
1821:
1799:
1721:Mkunga lalem
1714:
1704:Mkunga lalem
1682:
1678:
1676:
1650:
1612:
1586:
1555:
1552:
1520:— Preceding
1516:
1488:
1471:
1458:
1435:
1428:
1400:
1396:
1384:
1376:
1374:
1348:
1334:Yellowlime31
1332:yES THERE IS
1298:
1295:
1281:
1221:
1207:
1204:
1189:
1165:
1151:
1148:diabloii.net
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1133:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1080:
1077:
1069:
1066:
1050:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1018:
1014:
1007:
966:Making sure
958:Please read
957:
944:
941:
934:
931:
909:
894:
891:
873:
842:— Preceding
838:
811:
808:
805:
775:
733:
667:
664:
645:
599:
591:
509:
504:
468:
453:
450:
447:
441:
437:
432:
429:
420:
417:
386:
355:
315:— Preceding
311:
296:
281:
249:83.71.40.126
240:
236:
233:
197:— Preceding
192:
168:
158:
149:
144:
140:
138:
133:
129:
127:
123:
119:
116:
93:
85:
84:
67:
57:
51:
32:
26:
1861:82.26.23.58
1855:—Preceding
1553:Kinslayer,
1503:RevRagnarok
1309:yellow lime
1166:independent
806:Kinslayer,
747:Paul August
720:Paul August
651:VectorPosse
592:assert the
545:VectorPosse
1933:Categories
1901:topic bans
1393:Electropop
1156:Graf Bobby
594:notability
95:/Archive 1
1897:site bans
1840:Chetvorno
1836:talk page
1812:Chetvorno
1768:db-author
1761:consensus
1405:Sn0wflake
1305:talk page
1191:policy.
1041:however:
968:Magnetica
802:Thank you
673:Coredesat
414:Some help
219:Perhaps.
59:wikibreak
1857:unsigned
1638:contribs
1618:db-empty
1573:contribs
1561:unsigned
1534:contribs
1522:unsigned
1381:WP:CIVIL
1193:Rklawton
1150:for the
1119:contribs
1107:unsigned
914:unsigned
856:contribs
844:unsigned
816:unsigned
579:Billlion
457:Kjartan8
403:contribs
391:unsigned
372:contribs
360:unsigned
329:contribs
317:unsigned
300:Janeybee
245:unsigned
211:contribs
199:unsigned
87:Archives
1696:Kariteh
1494:db-spam
1485:Kushies
1385:respect
1144:Fallout
901:WP:NPOV
767:notable
395:Altazen
364:Altazen
321:Altazen
145:created
1887:. The
1824:Pcstas
1808:Pcstas
1735:" and
1565:OKSoda
1526:OKSoda
1210:Ajexus
1201:Ajexus
1170:WP:NOT
1152:Diablo
1111:Ajexus
1090:Ajexus
1051:really
984:(talk)
960:WP:AGF
905:WP:NOR
646:speedy
510:should
293:Thanks
181:Pcstas
175:helpme
162:Pcstas
152:Pcstas
68:Click
1652:Leebo
1588:Leebo
1401:civil
1397:Storm
1395:, as
1284:Bowsy
1278:Sorry
1254:Bowsy
1235:Bowsy
1021:Bowsy
776:Leebo
685:From
600:Leebo
339:here.
141:first
1921:talk
1865:talk
1838:. --
1717:prod
1715:A {{
1692:here
1690:and
1688:here
1634:talk
1569:talk
1530:talk
1472:more
1391:and
1350:up.
1142:for
1115:talk
1004:DRVs
922:talk
903:and
899:for
878:InBC
852:talk
824:talk
762:This
399:talk
368:talk
325:talk
253:talk
207:talk
70:here
1881:Hi,
1681:or
1629:KFP
1296:Hi
1146:or
465:IMA
234:Yo
189:why
1935::
1923:)
1899:,
1867:)
1773:.
1771:}}
1765:{{
1636:|
1621:}}
1615:{{
1571:•
1536:)
1532:•
1497:}}
1491:{{
1460:--
1434:--
1425:CN
1121:)
1117:•
924:)
858:)
854:•
826:)
405:)
401:•
374:)
370:•
331:)
327:•
255:)
213:)
209:•
178:}}
172:{{
1919:(
1863:(
1662:C
1658:/
1640:)
1632:(
1598:C
1594:/
1567:(
1528:(
1438:M
1125:.
1113:(
928:.
920:(
850:(
830:.
822:(
786:C
783:/
750:☎
723:☎
610:C
607:/
409:.
397:(
378:.
366:(
323:(
259:.
251:(
205:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
