25:
113:
232:, a copy of the Knowledge database from 20 December 2001. They can be accessed through the contributions page because during the import process, all underlines in usernames are converted to spaces.
165:) in late January 2002. Since the only way for the original user with this name to gain access to this account is by developer intervention, this account should remain indefinitely blocked.
131:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
128:
39:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
172:
for the reason why this user's edits from before
February 2002 do not show up in the user's contributions list. Examples of this user's edits include
70:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
157:
This account was used by a legitimate
Knowledge editor who contributed before February 2002, and was subsequently taken over by a sockpuppet of
75:
161:. This was possible because the account was abandoned by its original owner after Knowledge converted to phase II software (which became
40:
79:
44:
229:
32:
143:
124:
98:
48:
127:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
158:
139:
94:
83:
56:
63:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
238:
210:
186:
64:
169:
168:
The name of this user is currently stored with an underline in the
Knowledge database; see
71:
234:
206:
182:
134:
120:
89:
36:
18:
24:
201:
225:
112:
224:
Some edits from 2001 now appear in this user's contribution list. They were
162:
243:
215:
191:
147:
102:
111:
74:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
23:
51:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
43:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
177:
173:
200:As it turns out, this was an alternate account of
129:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Impulse drive
8:
35:template has been added to the article
7:
14:
108:AfD nomination of Impulse drive
123:, an article you created, for
1:
82:, where it may be deleted if
216:01:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
192:01:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
49:Knowledge's deletion policy
262:
178:this edit to Impulse Drive
137:of receiving this notice?
92:of receiving this notice?
72:proposed deletion process
244:12:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
148:04:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
103:19:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
76:speedy deletion criteria
86:to delete is reached.
116:
41:criteria for inclusion
28:
115:
80:Articles for Deletion
78:or it can be sent to
45:What Knowledge is not
27:
17:Proposed deletion of
230:Nostalgia Knowledge
117:
29:
174:this edit to CP/M
138:
119:I have nominated
93:
33:proposed deletion
253:
241:
213:
189:
132:
87:
62:
61:
55:
261:
260:
256:
255:
254:
252:
251:
250:
239:
211:
187:
159:JarlaxleArtemis
155:
140:Judgesurreal777
133:Do you want to
110:
95:Judgesurreal777
88:Do you want to
59:
53:
52:
22:
12:
11:
5:
259:
257:
249:
248:
247:
246:
219:
218:
196:
154:
151:
109:
106:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
258:
245:
242:
237:
236:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
214:
209:
208:
203:
199:
198:
197:
194:
193:
190:
185:
184:
179:
175:
171:
166:
164:
160:
152:
150:
149:
145:
141:
136:
130:
126:
122:
121:Impulse drive
114:
107:
105:
104:
100:
96:
91:
85:
81:
77:
73:
68:
66:
65:its talk page
58:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:Impulse drive
34:
26:
20:
19:Impulse drive
16:
233:
205:
195:
181:
167:
156:
118:
69:
30:
57:dated prod
228:from the
163:MediaWiki
84:consensus
226:imported
125:deletion
202:Ansible
170:bug 323
135:opt out
90:opt out
235:Graham
207:Graham
183:Graham
47:" and
176:and
153:Note
144:talk
99:talk
240:87
212:87
204:.
188:87
180:.
146:)
101:)
67:.
60:}}
54:{{
31:A
142:(
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
