657:. Stbalbach advised him as Mursili that he shouldn't be a red user and have a good reputation so he came back with new blue user. How come those people who were so concerned over that line in Justinian were never there at the same time? Now I'm giving him ideas, you'll see that next time he'll try to operate more socks concurrently, thinking he can outsmart us. He's never going to admit being sockpuppet, he never did in the past, one time he tried to convince that he was the brother of someone who was banned. He'll always try to blame me of course, like that time when he started an RFC against me. I'll try to get the diffs although it was deleted. By now he's probably sending emails at admins, telling them about how innocent and victimised he has been.
1007:
their comments effectively meaningless. I believe this category should be restored, since there was certainly no consensus to delete, as
Category:Dutch world champions in sport (no -s) β or at the original name and have it returned to CfD for further discussion, since there was not really any consensus to rename it either (in fact I would argue against the rename; regardless I'm arguing much more strongly against the deletion, which doesn't seem to actually be supported). I for one found the category sensible and was actually using it. β
32:
721:, so this is by no means an evidence. This conversation shouldn't have taken place via emails but in wikipedia. It should have been open to all wikipedians, especially the editors who have had contacts with this user before. And what about "La belle aude" who mysteriously disappeared. No answer was ever given. Was there a CheckUser? What were the results?
1091:. I don't see any rationale for deleting the category itself, since it identified topics by significant (and non-overcategorization) facts. Not something really worth arguing about very much, since it's actually a larger issue of whether such world champ. categories should or shouldn't exist at all, which would be a larger topic for CfD. β
1024:
In the interim, could I please have a copy of the category showing the categorized individuals as it was before deletion, at User:SMcCandlish/Dutch Temp (or something else, as long as I know where it isΒ :)Β ? It strikes me as likely that because this was a subcat of Dutch sportspeople, that articles
1006:
that with a consensus determination of "delete", and I'm strongly curious as to why, since nominator and 50% of respondents supported rename, and stated reasons for this, while the other 50% of respondents supported merge, not delete, while nominator already pointed out that merge was moot, rendering
774:
2. References to specific wars: I could understand using 'military personnel' to refer to the category of all persons who ever served in the military (even though I disdain the term, as it blanches individuals of identity and the idea of serving of any value other than being a peon or robot). But for
645:
I was never suspecting
Stbalbach, he thought I was removing content out of the blue until I explained myself to him. In any case, despite what CheckUser shows, I cannot be convinced that La Belle Aude, Mursili, Iblardi are not the socks of the same person. Suddenly three editors arrive, one after the
778:
3. Purposes of remembrance: Part of the purpose of remembering veterans is to remember their sacrifice and committment, and also to remember that war is generally a bad thing, and should be limited to a last resort scenario. "Military personnel" blanches the category of any meaning. Human resources
766:
1. "Veteran": In particular, most people who participate in a war (war veterans) do NOT consider it to be a career. Yes, part of the HONOR that comes with being a VETERAN is that one survived danger in an effort to defend their nation. Yes, the issue is about being a survivor. And in particular for
1074:
Thanks; will make sure the articles are all catted right. DR: Eh. I'm not saying you abused admin power, I'm just disagreeing with your logic. Given the putsch to keep-and-rename and the rationale for those !votes, I think a simpler and more consensus-y thing to do would have been to remove any
814:
What is it about the phrase "bad faith" that makes people throw it around so needlessly, even resorting to ALL CAPS? The affected parties were informed of the debate by tagging the category pages, as is standard practice for category renaming debates. Tagging every single article contained within
730:
Would you be so kind as to keep me out of this, Miskin? I've replied to your email, you can run any kind of check on it you like. You make me feel very unwelcome on
Knowledge (XXG). I would prefer you'd answer my greenhorn-questions instead of ignoring my queries and start accusing me blindly of
598:
Please, be so kind as to tell me what I did wrong. I'm new to this, I've been editing away for a day now, but apparently, in spite of reading up on policy to avoid greenhorn mistakes, I have already enraged you. I have not reverted anything Greier has done, have I? And by the way, I'm a she. --
457:
Hi, there has recently been some contention over the isse of whether
Simpsons character pages need "episodes featuring" lists and it's been decided that the issue will be put to a vote. As a member of the WikiProject, your opinion on the matter would be appreciated. Join the discussion
672:- all by mere coincidence of course. Suddenly he had a sex change, thinking for some reason that he'd have more chances to fool us as a female. He obviously doesn't intend to stop sockpuppeting and disrupting wikipedia, hence why I've been enforcing the reversion of his edits.
964:
but I noticed the bottom is well out of the div or span block or whatever. Also note the category page is still showing the Cfd link. Can I clean that out now, or is there some special tagging (Talk page?) or annotation that needs made. Best regards //
779:
personnel may be hired or fired with the rise and fall of the stock market, nothing personal. Do we remember the 'last surviving human resources personnel of the office of Dean Witter, 1985'? Everyone's been fired since then! NO. I think not.
646:
other, and start edit-warring over the most insignificant edit in the world. Personally I feel that this guy overestimates his own potential by thinking that he can fool people like that. He claims that he doesn't even know how to make reverts
649:
and suddenly after scanning my contribution list he appears in wub's talk page, knowing everything about CheckUser, wp:ban etc. Look how much he insists on restoring one sentence that I don't even remember what it was about
529:
No, Jpgordon just said a checkuser was unnecessary given the evidence you presented i.e. it is obvious these are puppets. Declining to run a check based on lack of evidence is a different matter. I will block them now.
734:
The Wub, I'll leave that page alone for a while and I'll start editing some other stuff, even though
Justinian is a subject I feel most comfortable about. There is indeed plenty to do here for medievalists.
760:
First, I believe this discussion should be re-opened for debate, as affected articles were NOT informed of the debate (and therefore were excluded from either voting or presenting an alternate view).
982:
There was another div in one of the fancy linking templates that messed it up. I've sorted that now. As for the category page I just missed that the target was tagged as well, and have removed it.
924:
Could you post the last version of the 'Category
Neoconseratives' listing the individuals the category named in my user space, so they can be verfied and merged into another article as suggested?
775:
a specific category such as "American
Veterans of WWI", isn't the category already linked to a specific idea and time period, one that cannot be associated with a career as a personnel of WWI.
1003:
353:
692:
422:
Hmmm this appears to be a bug in AWB, it just happened again today (fortunately I was looking out for it). I did upgrade yesterday and start using a new plugin, so I'll report it.
613:
parties to take a break from the
Justinian article for a while, there are plenty of other things to do around here. If the edit-warring continues I will not hesitate to protect.
380:. I don't know the language and did not know if it was intentional, so I just wanted to drop you a line here. If this was intentional then I'm sorry to have bothered you. --
573:
I think something is going wrong considering the
Justinian article. People are frustratingly disagreeing on how to proceed. Would you be so kind as to take a look at it?'
436:
Great, thank you for taking this with the spirit in which it was intended. I'm glad that I was able to give you the heads up during the run to help you catch it today. --
631:
has been on
Knowledge (XXG) since 2004, and is undoubtedly a user in good standing. As such he is clearly able to restore edits, as he is taking responsibility for them.
822:"Part of the purpose of remembering veterans is to remember their sacrifice and committment" From my perspective it seems you want to use these categories to espouse a
884:
1025:
from which the champions cat was removed may not have been updated to use Dutch sportpeople instead, and are thus uncategorized or incompletely categorized. β
898:
1049:, so from a purely practical standpoint there was no reason to move all the articles into the top category, only to have to remove them all again later.
459:
816:
404:
You may have something that you need to look into further, please. From your edit history, it looks like at least the next few edits after that one
763:
Second, I believe this is a bad nomination because it sacrifices content for alleged consistency, when in fact there IS no consistency. Consider:
609:
Following this and an e-mail from Iblardi I have asked Jpgordon to consider running the Checkuser anyway, to clear things up. I would encourage
519:
Thanks for fixing this . Judging by Greier's background, don't you think this deserves a checkuser? I think it was rejected due to my mistake.
587:
as Greier's newest sock. He has apparently been watching my contribution list and claims that he doesn't even know how to make a revert yet.
1045:
for the reasons given by Otto4711 and in my closing statement. However all the member articles were in other appropriate subcategories of
931:
782:
The bottom line: the renaming of the categories was done in BAD FAITH since the affected parties were NOT informed of the debate.β
339:
Would it be permissible to rename the cat as indicated as an option during the CfD or should that be put back up as a new CfD?
1084:
1088:
1080:
801:
1057:
961:
755:
1076:
1046:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
271:
264:
261:
258:
255:
246:
243:
240:
237:
228:
225:
222:
219:
210:
207:
204:
201:
192:
189:
186:
177:
174:
171:
162:
159:
156:
153:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
123:
120:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
96:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
60:
57:
54:
51:
1041:
CfD is not a vote, and I believe this case was an acceptable use of 'closer discretion'. I basically did close it as
861:
1053:
319:
856:
custom button bar definitions have changed in the latest software update to version 0.9.25. Please check the
376:
Hello. I noticed that you removed an iw language link at the same time that you were removing a category in
356:? That seems sensible, but another CfD might be worthwhile just to check no one has any problems with it.
666:
Oh right, I just discovered another remarkable anecdote, La Belle Aude claims to be from the Netherlands
390:
No that was a mistake, not sure how it happened. I have restored the link, thanks for letting me know.
437:
414:
381:
556:
971:
857:
853:
842:
756:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_2#Military_veterans
736:
600:
584:
574:
325:
1064:
986:
944:
905:
830:
635:
617:
534:
503:
463:
426:
394:
360:
17:
1094:
1028:
1010:
321:
31:
823:
560:
998:
Disagreement over closing of CfD on Category:Dutch world champions in sports as 'delete'
771:
was the last surviving military personnel of the Meuse-Argonne offensive? I think not.
783:
768:
628:
1056:
as requested. If you still feel my actions were inappropriate, you can bring it up at
967:
545:
I see now. I have no prior experience in this matter, thank you for the explanation.
490:
815:
those categories is completely impractical. Furthermore the rename was discussed by
1061:
983:
941:
902:
870:
827:
709:
632:
614:
531:
500:
476:
423:
391:
357:
1102:
1069:
1036:
1018:
991:
976:
949:
934:
910:
891:
873:
860:
for more information. All you have to do is to update the following lines in your
835:
807:
739:
725:
712:
702:
676:
661:
640:
622:
603:
591:
577:
567:
549:
539:
523:
508:
493:
466:
440:
431:
417:
399:
384:
365:
346:
323:
722:
699:
673:
658:
588:
564:
546:
520:
343:
888:
718:
Wub you're making a mistake. Greier has prior history of editing with proxies
686:
897:
Ooh, the link went screwy. It was proposed (not by me) on January 22 for
883:
I somehow missed the discussion where you proposed the name change of
901:. There were no objections after 48 hours so the rename went ahead.
719:
1052:
I have listed the articles that were removed from the category at
767:
aged veterans, surviving old age as well. For example, do we say
326:
25:
354:
Category:Lists of Marvel Comics characters by organisation
555:
Oh btw, he just created another sockpuppet of himself in
670:
667:
655:
653:
651:
647:
411:
409:
407:
405:
377:
693:
Special:Undelete/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Miskin
559:. Is he consider formally banned? I'd like to enforce
1075:
redundant cat.'s from the articles in question like
864:
page (disable JavaScript if you cannot edit pages):
477:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction
335:
re: Category:Lists of Marvel Comics superhero teams
708:the wub, thanks a lot for resolving this matter.
885:Category:Companies based in the Silicon Valley
685:Greier's failed attempt to outsmart wikipedia
8:
731:things I hitherto didn't even knew existed.
867:wikEdButtonBar = ]; wikEdButtonBar = ];
845:custom button bar definitions have changed
583:Oh yeah, I would also like to bring up
688:(compare to the show he puts on here)
669:, just like user Iblardi had claimed
7:
695:(compare to the emails Iblardi sent)
563:against him by reverting his edits.
819:before even being proposed at CfD.
691:Greier's failed attempt to RFC me
24:
1083:from an article that already had
1079:, the same way one would remove
752:Regarding the below discussion:
484:Please, have a look on "Plato".
30:
1085:Category:Scottish sportspeople
1:
1103:23:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
1089:Category:English sportspeople
1081:Category:British sportspeople
1070:19:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
1037:03:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
1019:03:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
992:13:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
977:07:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
950:11:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
935:03:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
927:Please put it in my sandbox.
911:14:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
892:14:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
874:21:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
836:12:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
808:07:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
740:10:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
726:17:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
713:14:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
703:23:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
677:23:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
662:22:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
641:22:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
627:Also Miskin please note that
623:21:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
604:21:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
592:20:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
578:19:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
568:15:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
550:14:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
540:17:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
524:17:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
817:WikiProject Military history
509:14:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
494:07:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
467:05:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
441:14:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
432:13:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
418:12:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
400:11:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
385:03:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
366:11:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
347:01:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1077:Category:Dutch sportspeople
1054:User:SMcCandlish/Dutch Temp
1047:Category:Dutch sportspeople
826:, which is against policy.
1123:
487:Martin Segers (Belgium)
453:The Simpsons WikiProject
413:did the same thing. --
997:
681:Here are some diffs:
585:User:La Belle Aude
745:Military Veterans
332:
331:
18:User talk:The wub
1114:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1067:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1017:
1014:
1013:
989:
974:
947:
917:Deleted category
908:
833:
805:
798:
793:
790:
638:
620:
537:
506:
429:
397:
363:
327:
34:
26:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1099:
1093:
1092:
1065:
1058:deletion review
1033:
1027:
1026:
1015:
1009:
1008:
1000:
987:
972:
960:Hi! You closed
958:
945:
919:
906:
899:speedy renaming
881:
868:
847:
831:
804:
799:
796:
791:
784:
747:
636:
618:
535:
517:
504:
474:
455:
427:
395:
374:
361:
337:
328:
322:
313:
312:
311:
39:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1120:
1118:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1050:
999:
996:
995:
994:
957:
954:
953:
952:
918:
915:
914:
913:
880:
877:
866:
858:wikEd homepage
846:
840:
839:
838:
820:
800:
769:Antonio Pierro
746:
743:
716:
715:
697:
696:
689:
629:User:Stbalbach
607:
606:
595:
594:
571:
570:
543:
542:
516:
513:
512:
511:
499:Say what now?
489:
488:
486:
485:
483:
482:
480:
479:
473:
470:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
438:After Midnight
415:After Midnight
382:After Midnight
373:
370:
369:
368:
336:
333:
330:
329:
324:
320:
318:
315:
314:
310:
309:
304:
299:
294:
289:
284:
279:
274:
268:
45:
44:
41:
40:
35:
29:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1119:
1104:
1096:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1012:
1005:
993:
990:
985:
981:
980:
979:
978:
975:
970:
969:
963:
956:Mal-alignment
955:
951:
948:
943:
939:
938:
937:
936:
933:
928:
925:
922:
916:
912:
909:
904:
900:
896:
895:
894:
893:
890:
886:
878:
876:
875:
872:
865:
863:
859:
855:
850:
844:
841:
837:
834:
829:
825:
824:point of view
821:
818:
813:<sigh: -->
812:
811:
810:
809:
803:
794:
789:
788:
780:
776:
772:
770:
764:
761:
758:
757:
753:
750:
744:
742:
741:
738:
737:La Belle Aude
732:
728:
727:
724:
720:
714:
711:
707:
706:
705:
704:
701:
694:
690:
687:
684:
683:
682:
679:
678:
675:
671:
668:
664:
663:
660:
656:
654:
652:
648:
643:
642:
639:
634:
630:
625:
624:
621:
616:
612:
605:
602:
601:La Belle Aude
597:
596:
593:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
576:
575:La Belle Aude
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
541:
538:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
514:
510:
507:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
492:
478:
471:
469:
468:
465:
461:
452:
442:
439:
435:
434:
433:
430:
425:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
410:
408:
406:
403:
402:
401:
398:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
371:
367:
364:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
340:
334:
317:
316:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
269:
267:
266:
263:
260:
257:
253:
249:
248:
245:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
147:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
126:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
67:
63:
62:
59:
56:
53:
49:
43:
42:
38:
33:
28:
27:
19:
1042:
1001:
966:
959:
929:
926:
923:
920:
882:
869:
851:
848:
786:
785:
781:
777:
773:
765:
762:
759:
754:
751:
748:
733:
729:
717:
698:
680:
665:
644:
626:
610:
608:
572:
557:User:!blardi
544:
518:
475:
456:
375:
342:Thanks... β
341:
338:
251:
250:
233:
232:
215:
214:
197:
196:
182:
181:
167:
166:
149:
148:
128:
127:
99:
92:
91:
65:
64:
47:
46:
36:
1095:SMcCandlish
1029:SMcCandlish
1011:SMcCandlish
862:monobook.js
749:Greetings,
481:discussion
879:Discussion
462:. Thanks,
930:Thanks -
378:this edit
190:A M J J A
178:A S O N D
175:M A M J J
163:A S O N D
52:M A M J J
491:Tsi43318
464:Scorpion
37:Archives
1062:the wub
984:the wub
942:the wub
921:Hello,
903:the wub
871:Cacycle
828:the wub
710:Iblardi
633:the wub
615:the wub
532:the wub
501:the wub
424:the wub
392:the wub
372:iw link
358:the wub
193:S O N D
142:J J A S
50:: J F
1004:closed
940:Done.
723:Miskin
700:Miskin
674:Miskin
659:Miskin
589:Miskin
565:Miskin
561:WP:BAN
547:Miskin
521:Miskin
344:J Greb
1043:merge
962:this
932:FaAfA
889:evrik
854:wiked
843:wiked
792:Young
515:socks
472:Plato
265:O N D
262:J A S
259:A M J
256:J F M
247:O N D
244:J A S
241:A M J
238:J F M
229:O N D
226:J A S
223:A M J
220:J F M
211:O N D
208:J A S
205:A M J
202:J F M
187:J F M
160:M J J
145:O N D
16:<
1066:"?!"
1002:You
988:"?!"
946:"?!"
907:"?!"
887:. --
852:the
849:Hi,
832:"?!"
802:talk
637:"?!"
619:"?!"
536:"?!"
505:"?!"
460:here
428:"?!"
396:"?!"
362:"?!"
307:2023
302:2022
297:2021
292:2020
287:2019
282:2018
277:2017
272:2016
252:2015
234:2014
216:2013
198:2012
183:2011
168:2010
150:2009
129:2008
93:2007
66:2006
48:2005
1087:or
973:nkB
968:Fra
611:all
352:To
172:J F
157:M A
154:J F
136:M A
133:J F
121:O N
109:M J
85:O N
82:A S
79:J J
76:A M
73:F M
61:N D
55:A S
1060:.
806:}
254::
236::
218::
200::
185::
170::
152::
131::
95::
68::
1100:γ
1034:γ
1016:γ
797:Ε
795:{
787:R
139:M
124:D
118:S
115:A
112:J
106:A
103:M
100:F
97:J
88:D
70:J
58:O
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
