User talk:Thi - Knowledge (XXG)

956:

comment by various people there (just as discussion about Design was opened for long stage). I noted you recently closed discussion about Netherlands, and I am ok with that, I admit but would wish to wait unitil something more will be said about Peru and Singapoore which are two examples of countries which are vital for entirely diffrent factors. 2 I know it is not my stuff but what do you think to add few more things to your userpage? (at least what your nickname mean, or to we know how we should reffer to you, "he?", "she?") 3I years ago noted article on

22: 1347: 1257: 1132: 848: 776: 617: 434: 178: 73: 553:. However, the Level 2 talk page introduction says the following: “Since changes to this list may affect lower-level lists, discussions regarding its composition are best initiated at Knowledge (XXG) talk:Vital articles”. Since the proposed change only involves a Level 2 page and a Level 3 page, shouldn’t the discussion be on the main page rather than on the Level 2 page? 1390: 987:

Happy New Year for you too. 1) I will not close the mentioned discussion. 2) Maybe I should have chosen some other username, but for me it is just three letters. Finnish has only gender-neutral pronouns, so I haven't paid attention for them. You can refer to me as you wish. 3) Unfortunately I already

1229:

But I'm not trying to step on your toes or anything. I wanted to discuss with you to see how you felt about possibly incorporating some of these ideas into the vitals pages. Specifically, maybe we shouldn't let people archive proposals they opposed, and possibly we shouldn't even bother archiving

1090:

Hi Thi, I would like to see your own list of vital articles to see what you think is important to cover for Knowledge (XXG) especially the People section for levels 3 and 4. Let me know what your thoughts are regarding my suggestion. There hasn't been a lot of activity on the vital articles pages

568:

The intro text was added many years ago when only few people watched Level 2 talk page, but last year there were lots of proposals and active discussions in Level 2. Currently it is quite silent at all levels of the project and it is possible that the discussion will be open for several months. I

370:

as no consensus, 2-0. I think the proposal has a reasonable chance of passing, as no one has yet voiced any objection to my nomination, but I'm not sure how to draw enough attention to it to have a discussion. Should I nominate it again, or is there a way to re-open the discussion? Thanks for the

288:

By the way, after sanctioning the proposal, I closed it marking it passed. Although according to the 15-day rule if after 15 days after the proposal there are at least five votes and at least two-thirds of votes are supportive it can be closed as passed, I wonder if it is appropriate to close the

955:

Hello Thi, and warmest wishes to Happy New Year !! I have some questions to you (will write point by point as I have quite not idiomatic language ability in English when write long sentences): 1 Could you please not close soonly discussion about Peru and Singapoor until there will be no few more

517:

Hi Thi. Actually I "would" agree with no consensus for removal Heisenberg (I had on my mind to keep oppose vote for straight removal of Heisenberg without Niels Bohr, or without swap with Copenhagen interpretation) but technically removal was 4-1 (or 3-1 if You were neutral on removal at the

1035:

In a number of vital articles swap proposal you closed the discussion in ways like "result=Swap 1-1, removal 2-1, addition 1-2.". In my opinion this is not enough useful when most votes are voting removal and addition separately, and thus I think it is more meaningful to count votes that

85:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

190:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

824:, which you had closed recently, is a bit problematic since "On Crimes and Punishments" and "Dei delitti e delle pene", which mentioned in it were not Italicized or punctuated, which is non-standard. Hope that you Italicize them a.s.a.p.-- 935:

I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Knowledge (XXG). Wishing you the best from,

1302: 1177: 891: 660: 477: 218: 113: 1015:

Actually in "I think that the study of music is clearly vital topic at this level." "a" should be added after "clearly" and before "vital". Hope that next time you can proofread what you type carefully before

1286:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1161:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 875:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 644:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 461:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 202:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 97:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1271: 1146: 861: 630: 447: 1361: 787: 961: 143:

Thi, thanks for moving that item on the Manx cat in the talk page for me. I totally goofed on that one. I will be more diligent to put items in the correct section next time.

367: 593:

I've noticed that lately you've been providing more detail when contributing to the vital articles discussions. I just wanted to thank you for that. Cheers,

1226:

I put my reasoning as since you'd opposed it and it'd only been 5 days past the minimum, and proposals auto-archive after 60 days anyway, I could undo it.

1036:

support/oppose swaps as simultaneously supporting/opposing removal and addition, such that result cited above would become "removal 3-2, addition 2-3.".

960:

has bit specific form, I noted you retired from constributions into articles on Knowledge (XXG) but would you ever have time to split it into at least

550: 407: 255:

You claimed that the proposal completely succeeded, yet only four Wikipedians agreed to remove the novel, thus only the addition part passed.--

1401:" has a very specific definition on Knowledge (XXG)—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as 1366: 1091:

within the past few months, so if you compiled your own list of vital articles, we could see what holes the list has in order to improve it.

289:

proposal right after voting to support it, making it to meet the criterion of passing according to the rule I mentioned. What do you think?--

783: 1325: 1200: 914: 682: 499: 232: 127: 570: 546: 534: 1321: 1196: 910: 678: 495: 228: 123: 1295: 1170: 884: 653: 470: 211: 106: 1307: 1182: 896: 665: 482: 223: 118: 1356: 799: 1394: 1096: 941: 715: 50: 1418: 1240: 1283: 1158: 872: 641: 458: 406:

I understand you are the remaining moderator of the "vital articles" projects. I just want you to be aware of

199: 94: 779: 768: 1115: 38: 1374: 1051:

I counted the votes separately, it was "removal 2-1, addition 1-2". "Swap 1-1" was meant as a sidenote. --

1406: 810: 1359:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

1071:

Hello, noticed it is almost couple months since you did anything at VA or anything at Knowledge (XXG).

1092: 937: 711: 1355:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the

1265: 1140: 855: 624: 441: 186: 81: 1414: 1402: 1352: 1338: 1236: 1076: 1021: 977: 829: 523: 342: 294: 260: 1279: 1223:

I just wanted to let you know I undid your archive of my Vital-2 proposal because it made me sad.

1154: 868: 821: 637: 454: 195: 90: 1111: 56: 1370: 1041: 598: 558: 415: 1291: 1166: 880: 649: 466: 207: 102: 1314: 1189: 903: 672: 489: 144: 52: 21: 1294:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1287: 1169:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1162: 1009: 883:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 876: 652:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 645: 469:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 462: 210:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 203: 105:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 98: 1398: 817: 245: 1413:

of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.

1072: 1017: 973: 825: 795: 519: 376: 338: 290: 256: 249: 741: 1037: 594: 554: 411: 1256: 1131: 847: 616: 433: 177: 72: 965: 1005: 969: 957: 1110:

Hello I noticed that you have not included a bird in the thraupidae family

791: 372: 1052: 989: 752: 737: 574: 542: 387: 312: 271: 156: 1389: 1298:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1173:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

887:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

656:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

473:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

214:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

109:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1275:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1150:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

865:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

634:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

451:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

359: 1230:

proposals since we've established auto-archiving? What do you think?

54: 1311:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1186:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 900:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 669:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 486:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1422: 1393:

Hi Thi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at

1378: 1329: 1301:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

1269:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

1244: 1204: 1176:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

1144:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

1119: 1100: 1080: 1060: 1045: 1025: 997: 981: 945: 918: 890:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

833: 803: 760: 745: 719: 686: 659:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

602: 582: 562: 527: 503: 476:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

419: 395: 380: 346: 320: 298: 279: 264: 244:

About your closure of the discussion about whether to replace "

236: 217:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

164: 149: 131: 112:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1031:

The way you count removal/addition support in VA swap proposal

859:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

628:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

57: 15: 368:

Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/4/Archive_62#Add_Foxconn

445:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1282: