User talk:Tim96144 - Knowledge (XXG)

1923:

described by the license. Knowledge (XXG) content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Agreement (CC BY-SA 3.0) and the GNU Free Archive License (GFDL). It means that the encyclopedia will always be free, and that anyone can use it. Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Knowledge (XXG)? A: Because the database servers are located in the United States, Knowledge (XXG) is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law. According to US copyright law, the primary things to consider when asking if something is fair use: 1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. The nature of the copyrighted work; 3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? A: If I want to use it, must contact the owner of the copyright of the text or illustration in question If I wish to reuse content from Knowledge (XXG), first read the Reusers' rights and obligations section. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? A: 1.Organize this knowledge or synthesize various sources, and write them down in your own words. Then indicate the source of the source as an external link at the end of the article, or use the wiki's footnote feature. 2. Ask the original author and request to waive the copyright or part of the copyright of this work (including but not limited to CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and other licenses allowed by Knowledge (XXG)), so as to allow others (including Knowledge (XXG)) to modify, Build new versions etc. The version used by Knowledge (XXG), and later developed versions, will be released in free form under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license. 3. Use material that does not itself have a copyright claim. Generally, the homepage of the website will publish a copyright statement, so you must check the relevant requirements. If it is stated that the content is free (modification and commercial use must be allowed), or the content of the public domain, it can be reproduced arbitrarily. And it should be noted that simply writing "reprinting allowed" or "reprinting please indicate the source" is not a valid free license agreement; the website must clearly declare that the content is in the public domain or released under an agreement permitted by Knowledge (XXG).

2182:

371:

stop and acknowledged it is annoying to me, yet this is about the fourth time I've come here to ask Tim to stop so excuse my...impolite tone. I've explained to Tim why there are editors besides myself who look at what he does (the plagiarism, still creating articles after you advised him to stop, fixing up his poor grammar) but he has no reason for doing it vice versa. Do you think this is worth a warning for him to stop? I've gone through this with other editors, but Tim claims he understands and then continues to do it anyway. I'm going to be blunt, but I just don't see how Tim is ever going to evolve beyond a continued timesink with the amount of issues he has caused and continues to cause. He clearly does not understand simple requests.

769:"I won't live without Knowledge (XXG)"... Tim, that sounds like a very unhealthy obsession. There's a whole world outside of Knowledge (XXG) and furthermore the Internet. If you really "can't live without Knowledge (XXG)", well, your first language is Mandarin, right? Why don't you learn the ropes on the Mandarin Knowledge (XXG) and contribute to its coverage of Western pop and country music as you have been doing here? And as it's your first language you wouldn't need to directly quote as much because you can paraphrase better. Anyway, just a suggestion. 1402:, I know those bad things will cause damage my reputation on Knowledge (XXG). After leaving for two months, I found other pleasures, at the same time also found new job, after knowing it's more important things than Knowledge (XXG), I didn't more addict to Knowledge (XXG) than before, because Knowledge (XXG) just a little little parts of my Internet life. If my account can unblock, I will edit simple part of articles, or like the same as in the past, add or update these lists which was forgotten, obey 1727:

States, so Knowledge (XXG) is constraint by US copyright law, need to obey. If the content is use for criticism, parody, news reporting, research and scholarship, and teaching, the copyrighted content is available to use. For avoid getting the copyrighted warning, obtain the consent of the original author before citing the sources, if I without the consent of others, don't copy, quote and share, finally if I make mistakes about

2249: 2019: 1256: 2088: 1837: 1641: 1481: 1309: 598: 993: 342:. Next time I promise you I am informing an administrator of your continued hounding. Leave me alone and stop following me to articles you have never edited. You are a serial pest and your destiny is truly becoming to be blocked on this website. Don't think I won't notice you editing articles hours after me tomorrow, the day after, the week after. Stop and go away. 2036:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1273:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 798:

repeatedly ignored warnings and a previous block. I am also acknowledging that there is something unhealthy with being so obsessed about any subject. Just know that some of your work was appreciated by some editors. Consider Ss112's suggestion above, and I hope you can find a way to return and contribute where your edits are beneficial. --

1938:

when answering, "Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?" (though I admit, your answer is unclear and may be attempting to reference this). Additionally, the following answer is incorrect: "If it is stated that the content is free (modification and commercial use must be allowed), or

391:

While I can't ask anyone to stop adding properly sourced chart positions, yes, it would probably be in the best interest of everyone involved if you two kept interactions to a minimum. Tim, it is not anyone's responsibility to edit anything on Knowledge (XXG) - we're all volunteers here and no one is

271:

Hounding has nothing to do with a consensus. I don't know why you're talking about reaching a consensus. Me telling you to stop hounding me is not something you can negotiate your way out of. You do not have an obligation to stalk somebody's edits to monitor whether or not they've forgotten to update

1726:

Copyright is the exclusive right of the copyright owner to his work. About the Knowledge (XXG) licenced, it is co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. Because Knowledge (XXG)'s database servers located at the United

797:

I for one am sad to see you blocked. I think many articles have benefited from your edits adding properly sourced charts. You became one of those editors that I can ignore on my watchlist, knowing their edits are solid. I am not saying the block is unjustified as these are serious concerns and you

370:

Along with all the other issues Tim has caused (block evasion, plagiarism, harassing me on my talk page while logged out), he's now hounding me. I have no other word for it. It is straight-up pestering and using my contributions as some sort of guide on what to edit. He claimed above that he would

208:

so important to you that you feel compelled to stay up for hours past the last edit you made in order to make sure it's updated? Couldn't you have done it when you came online later? What gives, do you wake up in the middle of a night in a cold sweat thinking about chart positions? Your editing

1922:

What is copyright? A: According to copyright.gov, copyright is a type of intellectual property that protects original works of authorship as soon as an author fixes the work in a tangible form of expression. How is Knowledge (XXG) licenced? A: A license is a permission to use a work in the way

2181:

The text of Knowledge (XXG) is copyrighted (automatically, under the Berne Convention) by Knowledge (XXG) editors and contributors and is formally licensed to the public under one or several liberal licenses. How is Knowledge (XXG) licenced? A license is a permission to use a work in the way

67:

article, and many others related to him, can you please check these removals? He claims that he removed "largely unsubstantiated claims by poor sources or basic fancruft", but in reality these claims are false. He removed every update from the page, wikilinks, and lots of sourced things that

1574:. I have learned a lesson, after unlock, I will obey any specification on Knowledge (XXG) from scratch, if I violation copyright warning or sockpuppets again, I will quit Knowledge (XXG) forever. I hope everyone can give me a last chance to edit Knowledge (XXG). ~ to administrators 936:. You are basically the only Taiwanese IP I find making chart updates, so stop trying or I will revert all I find. Find a life outside of Knowledge (XXG) or stick to the Mandarin Knowledge (XXG) like I suggested. It would do you a world of good. 1993:

Pings do not work unless you also sign the post in which you ping with four tildes(~~~~). Only a checkuser can authorize the removal of this block. Checkusers are limited in number and are volunteers, please be patient(I am not a checkuser).

177:. You have precedent for being a block-evading, harassing plagiariser here. It's understandable you'd be followed by other editors, but you have no reason for following me from article to article on Knowledge (XXG). 1112:

You can't keep block evading and then have any hope for an unblock request to work. You still haven't stopped block evading. No admin would ever unblock someone still actively and frequently block evading. See

696:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

1162:

Correct. Every time you evade your block, it resets that clock to six months again. You need to not edit Knowledge (XXG) for at least six months to even hope to have any chance at all to be unblocked.

1219:

Why did you waste my time asking me that if you were just going ignore my answer and ask to be unblocked anyways? This only furthers my belief that you're not ready to be editing Knowledge (XXG).

1742:

That started off well but went downhill. Your description of when we can use non free content is overly broad. While your description of getting permission prior to citing is just plain wrong.

243:

Because you sometimes forgot to update singles chart, you sometimes just updated artists discography's pages, but forgot to update the song/single's page, that's why I must stare at you.

264:

Your mean is: next time if I find you forget updating peaks again, I can't also help you update those, a question: who will deal with those? If it can reach a consensus, I will not be a

68:

shouldn't have been removed. He brought back the article to a 2019's version of that page. It seems to be heavy vandalism to me. Additionally, removing updated versions of articles like

1939:

the content of the public domain, it can be reproduced arbitrarily". Such content generally cannot be reproduced arbitrarily. Much free content requires attribution, for example.

1203:

request is, and work on explaining what's changed, how you've learned from your mistakes and won't make them again. So you're fully ready when it hits the six month mark.

1199:

No Admin is going to look at your history of socking and COPYVIO issues and decide to unblock you early. But now is the time to start working on understanding a good

1015: 543:

If you can't write in your own words, you shouldn't be writing/creating articles. This is the last reminder you'll get on this, as we've talked about this before.

2227:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1973:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1776:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1618:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1467:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

760:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

505: 1934:

The checkuser part of this block is (currently) clear. That's good. However, your answers are not generally correct. You appear to have missed all of

2048: 1285: 1037: 951: 1429:

Much too soon. You were caught further evading your block in April. Your best bet is to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under

564:, and I said the next time I catch you do it, I'd indefinitely block you. So instead, you're blocked indefinitely. I told you many times to read 2212: 1958: 1761: 1603: 1452: 1044: 745: 723: 2128: 1877: 1681: 1521: 1349: 640: 483: 1816: 1795: 77: 1117:. What you need to do is take some serious time away from the website, and then come up with a real well-thought out unblock request. 966:. You, as a person, are not allowed to edit the English Knowledge (XXG). Any time you are caught, your edits will be removed on sight. 1728: 1571: 1399: 873:

It might not matter much to you, but don't believe a word Tim says; two hours after he replied to you above, he re-registered with

475: 2123: 1872: 1676: 1516: 1344: 969:

To any admin who may review unblock requests in the future - let it be known that Tim has already been caught block evading.

635: 2032:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1269:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 107:. If you're adding a whole new wikitable, that is not minor. You really should know better by this point. If you don't, see 1148:. The mean is: If I wasn't found sockpuppetry or block evasion for half a year, I still have a chance to request unblock?? 2037: 2033: 1274: 1270: 576:

until you fully understood. And yet again you've violated this. You're not ready to be editing Knowledge (XXG) it seems.

324:

Clearly you don't understand, Tim. Again, just today, hours after saying you "understand", you followed me two articles,

2174: 2028: 1586: 1098:

Don't I any chances to return English Knowledge (XXG)?? Can't I use any unblock requests to return?? What should I do??

69: 44: 39: 34: 2101: 1850: 1654: 1494: 1322: 1006: 1001: 612: 2095: 1844: 1648: 1488: 1316: 1033: 606: 2100: