Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Tim1965/TalkArchives12

Source 📝

920:
away although for the final 2-3 weeks he was unable to go in to the office. I removed and/or corrected any references to that word. Thirdly, regarding my mother: "most of her family had been imprisoned and died in Nazi prison camps ....." is not true. Just one brother was in a concentration camp. Period. Fourthly, my parents arrived in the US (via Ellis Island) on February 8, 1952. They married in New York on August 9, 1952. I will be adding that fact back in. The correct amount of money they had in their pockets upon arrival was $ 6, not $ 12. Fifthly, my parents relocated to Washington, DC during the 2 years my father was in the Army and they remained in DC (and my dad in Arlington after he remarried) for the rest of their lives. I was born in DC. Sixthly, my parents NEVER knew each other in Prague; they met in a London bookstore. You correctly stated that but I removed the Prague reference. With regard to my father's architectural career, I have legal possession of all of the archives (drawings and files, etc.) from my father's office. It is a massive collection. As I go through it I will bring any other corrections to your attention. Also, I know that the collective worth of the buildings my father designed over his entire career is vastly in excess of $ 2 billion. However, I will let that figure stand until I can go through all the records and determine a more accurate value. Similarly, if you wish to add or change anything regarding my parents' personal lives you may verify it with me first. And lastly, please refrain from calling my father a "busy little termite". Thank you very much. Jana Koubek
508: 1140: 31: 591: 1756:. You said before you could defend the license. There's also a question of the 4 old image but on Commons it says "Works created but not published before January 1, 1978 are protected for 95 years from the date they were registered for copyright, or 95 (for anonymous or pseudonymous works)". As these are anon works, it'd seem to me at least the first two are PD due to them being over 95 years old, possibly the other two. 676: 1581: 1455: 772: 2193: 465:
years could be added (meaning that the works would not come into the public domain until 2024. But many of the paintings were never copyrighted, because copyright law at the time required that famous © symbol. I doubt any of Charlie's works have that. It would take a search at the Library of Congress to determine when each painting was first published, and when the copyright will run out.
957: 731: 302:, and refuse to seek DYK status for these five-fold expansions because it's just become so bureaucratic. People who never contribute to articles are passing judgment on articles. It's not about generating content any more, it's about exercising power over others and applying rules. I've stopped trying to get work recognized, and just generate content now. - 480:
nearby. But the question has arisen about when the artwork (murals, paintings, statues, etc.) inside the building were created, when they were published, if they were copyrighted in the first place, and if that copyright still exists. I can take photos for my own purposes and post them to Flickr or
2262:
Basically, I took the bus "all the way over" to the Smithsonian. LOL! Then I walked six blocks north and went to the movies in Chinatown. One thing I did learn: If you want to take photos in the Smithsonian with a tripod or monopod, you have to ask permission. It takes weeks to get that. Taking
1234:
Since copyright has not been registered, it's difficult to determine who owns it. All we can say is "since it's unclear, we must assume the object is copyrighted." Irregardless of who owns it, the Fair Use rules apply. Fair Use is met with that image. If someone wishes to challenge that, I'm all
1179:
See this inline comment from Nikkimaria "image description page needs more information on copyright - who holds copyright, creator, date of creation, who took the picture, what is the copyright on the picture (contradiction between licensing tag and FUR on this point - need additional licensing tag
1249:
Hey Tim. You're correct about presumption of copyright. My remaining concern here is that given it's a photo of a 3D object, we need explicit licensing tags covering both the photo and the object itself. The fair-use tag covers the object; you should decide under what license you'd like to release
919:
Specifically, I added my father's hometown of Brno. The date of his passing incorrectly read "February 18" at the top of the page; the correct date is February 15, as is correctly noted at right. Secondly, my father NEVER retired!!!! He and his office were in business up until the day he passed
464:
Not all the tags. The key word is "published." Not all of Charlies paintings were published during his lifetime, although a lot were. Many were not published until the 1950s, which means that they fall under the "author+70" rule. And even then, if renewal of the copyright was made, another 28
1357:
I'll fight the fight for keeping it -- a single fair use image usually passes FA, and in this case, it's the only image we have of a Yogo in a setting, it's a famous piece that contributes to the article, not a photo of the entire brooch, etc. I'm not too worried so long as we have a fair and
915:
I am the one who made the corrections to the article about Vlastimil Koubek. I am his daughter, Jana Koubek. While I do appreciate your efforts to bring his significant accomplishments to Knowledge (XXG), I was not even aware that the page existed until yesterday. There were several errors
2209:
from a new article to DYK to GA to FA and FOUR. The team effort of the uncountable people involved in getting this unique article to FA is a textbook case of teamwork in article improvement, ie, what Knowledge (XXG) should be, not what it all too often is. I can never thank everyone enough.
1430:
your edits in April 2010‎, it's clear that you are primarily responsible for the article's high quality. You appropriately deleted some of the old text, you wrote informative new passages in a clear style, and you provided at least one reliable reference for almost every sentence. Thanks!
993: 1982:
Carl says we're good with the photo of the Yogo and part of the jewelry piece. We may or may not want to crop it some. Let's roll. Tim, would you like to take care of this? if not I will, but first defer to you. You may want to move to Commons and provide diffs/permanent links to Carl's
2100:
Working on getting this up to GA. you appear to have the Fearing the Dark book. Can you check the page numbers are correct? I may need your assitance in finding page numbers of a few of the source. If I can't find them I may replace the sources with verifiable ones in google books.
291:
I am astonished at the problems with getting FA status for this. But I have become cynical about Knowledge (XXG) in the past six months, and therefore not surprised. I have had similar problems with getting articles into DYK. I just gave up on that. I improved the article about
1818:
Let's give people a chance to respond to your comment on the FA Talk page (it's Sunday; heck, even I'm just waking up! lol!), and see what they say. For pity's sake, I'm about to contact the authors themselves and see if they will disavow copyright just to get this settled! -
1200:
Well, I added sources to the image summary, and a discussion on the image Talk page. I don't see what the issue is with the author of the photo; the Summary section clearly indicates that I took the picture, and on what date. The real issue is whether Fair Use has been met. -
416:
That's right! He died in 1926, and from the biography I've read he did very little work in his last year or two due to illness. So I'm guessing nearly all his work is PD now. "Last of the Five Thousand" definitely is! That "Author+70" only applies to works created
1075:
I believe you that it took a long while for you to research but I'm glad you did because Weir was a true pioneer in my opinion. I think he was ahead of his time. I also like the picture you uploaded. Very nice. Is there anyway you can upload a picture of his wife
2014: 2308:
Hey Tim. I recently saw that you created a page in your sandbox for United Medical Center. Would you be interested in cleaning it up and moving it into the mainspace, as it would be an awesome addition to the site. I look forward to your opinion. Thanks!
134:
I think if I focused on a just one Yogo in the piece, that would suffice under fair use (as illustrative of the use of the gemstone). It also depends on when the piece was created, if the copyright was renewed, and all that stuff. I'll check on that. -
209: 702:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
613:
in Washington, D.C. This edit-a-thon will focus on improving and writing Knowledge (XXG) content about women from the Smithsonian who contributed to the sciences. It will be followed by a happy hour meetup! We look forward to seeing you
2125: 332:
over restructuring and changing leadership at FA cabal. To me it's more about power and the status quo than improving wiki. I sympathize with you. I would like to get Yogo to FA because it is distinctly and uniquely MONTANAN!
699: 706:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..
644: 223:
Hi, friend. I just bumped into some of your stuff today and I just wanted to drop by and congratulate you on your excellent work as a content contributor. An Old School barnstar for Old School quality work...
368:
So would I!  :) I wish I could spend my entire day just researching Montana articles and getting them to FA status. I'd redo that Charlie Russell article first. (His artwork is in the public domain!) -
1632: 1753: 525:
newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
516: 1496: 1795: 182:
I have no experience promoting an article to GA status in the Literature category. Do you know of someone who would be willing to do a pre-GA pass on the article to identify problems? -
1057:
Thank you! I'm very glad you liked it. It took a long while to research it, just because the sources weren't on the Web. But it was worth it; Weir had such an interesting life. -
1305:
Great. The image might still be challenged as to whether a fair-use image is required at all, but as you say you're prepared to defend it, we'll cross that bridge if we come to it.
818: 744: 1854:
That or we just have a fussy FA reviewer who doesn't understand image copyright. Wish there was someone we know who could weigh in -- at least, someone trusted.
107:
I don't think this would be a free image since AFAIK jewelery is considered art and you'd have to upload it as FU, but you probably know more about FU that I do.
247: 688: 477: 1899:
LOL! Well, I also think that we do have that. I think resolving the issue with the Conchita butterfly would allow us to photograph a lot of jewelry. -
1480:... that over two thousand skulls, legs, ribs and other body parts of unidentified soldiers were sorted and interred in various compartments under the 647:. Please feel free to post alternate hooks there. Please also be encouraged to perform a peer review of another wikicontributor's DYK nomination on 916:
regarding my parents' personal lives and I went in to correct them and to add supplemental information, my "sources" being my parents themselves.
2235:
NO WAY! You did soooooooooooooooooooooooooo much more work than I did! There's no way I can take credit for any tinkering at the edges I did. -
299: 2053:
I think it's better to do a speedy-delete on the Fair Use image, with the explanation that a cropped non-copyrightable version is on Commons. -
1008: 155: 522: 500: 643:
Hello, Tim1965. Thank you for writing up this article about Charles White. I have nominated it for DYK. The nomination template can be found
2034:
Cool. Are you going to rm the FU tag on the original and then move it to commons? I put the new one in the article and will update the FAC.
1419: 1339:
Unfortunately it can't unless we can demonstrate that the brooch design is not copyright-protected - Commons doesn't allow fair-use images.
2112: 270:
GREAT pic of Conchita Yogo and fair use rationale! Thanks for taking the trouble to take the photo. See talk page about my sad efforts.
876: 968: 1835:
OK. Yea, it needs settled. I'm frustrated no one has answered on the media page I asked about this on. Maybe it's an extra tough nut.
812: 891: 636: 481:
whatnot, but to get them on Knowledge (XXG) means I have to research each one at the Library of Congress. Not gonna be fun. -
1080:? It would help her article. I find her interesting. She was a little ahead of her time by later marrying a much younger man, 2251:
Yeah, but you went clear over to the Smithsonian to get your pics, I only had to walk a block up the street for mine! LOL!
1671: 1651:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1611: 1535: 1515:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
857: 837:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
437:
So the tags on Charlie's paintings are wrong and we should change them to PD-1923? maybe we can make charlie FA after Yogo.
1616: 1599: 936: 742:
has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
1587: 1461: 778: 1776:
Given the discussion on the FAC page, do you feel it's okay for you, as the uploader to change the license to just one?
692: 1482: 1473: 1286:
I'm glad you two understand how an image can have two different type licenses, because I don't ;-) Glad it worked out.
1180:
for photo). This is the image most likely to be challenged, at this point". Could you please address this? Thank you.
1730:
or other specific cleanup tags such as the IMdb specific tag that was on the article, should be used as appropriate.
621:...and if you do not live in the Washington, D.C. area, please forgive the intrusion and you can delete this invite! 2106:
Aspects of Fantasy: Selected Essays From the Second International Conference on the Fantastic in Literature and Film
1652: 1638: 1516: 1502: 838: 824: 38: 2128:
you used] to claim it is PD. Do you have the page number? Google book search isn't picking up "The Ghost Ship".♦
716: 598: 1724: 2164:
any more, as that was interlibrary loan. I'd need two to three weeks to get it again, if it is available. -
924: 1693: 1607: 1580: 1454: 1436: 972: 771: 626: 534: 2129: 2115: 1592: 1550: 1466: 1250:
the photo (PD, GFDL, CC-whatever) and add the appropriate tag/indication to the image description page.
783: 1648: 1512: 834: 329: 1702:
source (regardless of whether it is properly formated or in an external link) then other tags such as
64:
We have someone looking at this for FAC preparation. Casliber is commenting on the article talk page.
2286: 2219: 2076: 2043: 1992: 1970: 1923: 1878: 1844: 1806: 1785: 1765: 1706: 1561: 1396: 1344: 1310: 1295: 1255: 1224: 1189: 1161: 1120: 895: 709: 561: 446: 394: 342: 279: 259: 116: 97: 73: 161:
Hey, this article appears to be fairly well fleshed out. Have you ever considered putting it up for
1490: 753: 683: 667: 294: 1945: 507: 1866: 1738: 1665: 1529: 851: 549: 85: 1139: 992: 1642: 2268: 2240: 2169: 2147: 2058: 2022: 1952: 1904: 1824: 1752:
Your license on the brooch is being challenged at the Yogo FAC, which I listed yesterday, see
1432: 1326: 1276: 1240: 1206: 1077: 1062: 1016: 932: 739: 622: 530: 486: 426: 374: 307: 229: 187: 140: 47: 17: 1506: 1111:
We've restarted working on Yogo sapphire. Your great assistance would be greatly appreciated.
2314: 803: 790: 735: 656: 170: 552:. Hope you think they're better, and just in time for the Great Wiki Blackout of jan 2012! 162: 2278: 2211: 2068: 2035: 1984: 1962: 1915: 1870: 1836: 1798: 1777: 1757: 1553: 1388: 1340: 1306: 1287: 1251: 1216: 1181: 1153: 1112: 1094: 1047: 553: 438: 386: 334: 271: 251: 108: 89: 65: 2318: 2291: 2272: 2257: 2244: 2224: 2173: 2151: 2134: 2120: 2081: 2062: 2048: 2026: 1997: 1975: 1956: 1939: 1928: 1908: 1883: 1860: 1849: 1828: 1811: 1790: 1770: 1742: 1675: 1566: 1539: 1440: 1401: 1364: 1348: 1330: 1314: 1300: 1280: 1271:
If that's all that's needed, the image is public domain. I've added the PD-Self tag. -
1259: 1244: 1229: 1210: 1194: 1166: 1125: 1096: 1066: 1049: 1020: 976: 940: 899: 861: 757: 719: 660: 630: 566: 538: 490: 451: 430: 399: 378: 347: 311: 284: 264: 233: 191: 174: 144: 121: 102: 78: 2252: 2094: 2015:
File:Detail - Conchita Sapphire Butterfly head with Yogo sapphire crop - 2011-01-07.jpg
1934: 1855: 1415: 1407: 1359: 1081: 1034: 798: 749: 590: 811:
and handguns in 1935, the year workers at one of the company's plants voted to form a
2206: 1734: 1661: 1525: 1384: 847: 748:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
2264: 2236: 2192: 2165: 2143: 2054: 2018: 1948: 1900: 1820: 1689:
as being unreferenced. Only articles that are completely unreferenced should have
1322: 1272: 1236: 1202: 1058: 1012: 928: 482: 422: 370: 303: 225: 183: 136: 828: 2310: 2111:
Are you positive it is public domain though? The copyright was renewed in 1971.
1686: 1635:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1625: 1499:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 821:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 652: 208: 166: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1085: 1038: 875: 730: 1933:
Maybe the folks at commons might have some insights on the free image angle.
610: 700:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Big Gay Musical (2nd nomination)
956: 808: 1914:
Yes, but the problem is no one who knows images well is "ruling" on it.
1152:
Thank you for outstanding support and improvement of Montana articles.
890:
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month!
648: 248:
Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#Reshoot_of_Yogo_sapphires
1754:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Yogo sapphire/archive1
421:
1923. (Besides, even if it didn't, author+70 equals 1996! PD!) -
1084:. Today she'd be called a "cougar" if they married in 2012 lol. 1633:
Template:Did you know nominations/Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain
385:
Charlie's stuff is PD? Because pre-1923? Ah, they say author+70
1575: 1449: 766: 25: 1497:
Template:Did you know nominations/Civil War Unknowns Monument
1623:, which memorializes two men who died in the sinking of the 1604:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1478:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 795:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 506: 687:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1358:
reasonable reviewer who isn't doing his/her first FAR.
572:
Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-Thon and Meetup!
2205:
For your outstanding support and dedication in getting
1681:
unreferenced means no references, not poorly referenced
1427: 1423: 681:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1631:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1495:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
817:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
819:Template:Did you know nominations/Charles M. White 1321:If it can be moved to Commons, I'm all for it. - 1869:, MTBW found a free image of the Tiffany brooch. 807:authorized the spending of almost US$ 12,000 on 550:Talk:Yogo_sapphire#Latest_pear_and_purple_photos 2067:OK. You're the best one to take care of that. 609:will be held on Friday, March 30, 2012 at the 476:For example: I'm going to take photos of the 2277:You helped Tim, and it's deeply appreciated. 2108:, 1986. Do you have the page for the source? 8: 328:That's the view of many. See all the row on 86:Talk:Yogo_sapphire#Pre-FA_nom_round_of_edits 544:Latest pear and purple Yogo sapphire photos 478:George Washington Masonic National Memorial 88:. If you can great, if not, not a problem. 1596:was updated with a fact from the article 1470:was updated with a fact from the article 990: 873: 787:was updated with a fact from the article 689:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 206: 1215:thanks, I've asked Nikki to look at it. 606:Smithsonian Women in Science Edit-a-Thon 1614:both had to give approval to build the 1383:Are any further improvements needed to 951: 1716:[[Template:no footnotes|no footnotes]] 967:Thanks for your recent contributions! 156:The Man Who Fell in Love with the Moon 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1572:DYK for Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain 1009:Railway Labor Executives' Association 7: 1446:DYK for Civil War Unknowns Monument 1422:and on a comparison of the article 651:. Thanks. Happy editing. Cheers! -- 1947:and hope we can get resolution. - 725:DYK nomination of Charles M. White 246:Your attention is requested here: 24: 1944:I agree. I just posted there at 1867:Talk:Yogo_sapphire#Lookee_here.21 1001:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 698:The article will be discussed at 2191: 2013:It's cropped and up on Commons: 1685:Hi there, I saw that you marked 1579: 1453: 1138: 991: 955: 874: 770: 729: 674: 637:Charles M. White (industrialist) 589: 207: 29: 2142:Page 97 for the Coyle book. - 1961:Responses already, looks good. 1414:I appreciate your work on the 1037:article. I really enjoyed it. 1: 1617:Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain 1600:Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain 1007:For your outstanding work on 740:Did You Know nominations page 79:12:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC) 1033:You did a good job with the 567:01:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC) 539:19:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 499:January 2012 Newsletter for 2160:I don't have access to the 1483:Civil War Unknowns Monument 1474:Civil War Unknowns Monument 1420:revision history statistics 1235:for defending the image. - 601:She Blinded Me with Science 491:14:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 452:01:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 431:01:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 400:00:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 379:00:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 348:00:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 312:00:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 285:00:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 265:23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 234:01:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 192:01:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 175:18:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 145:16:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 122:11:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 103:00:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 2334: 2263:them by hand is hard... - 1402:22:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 1365:15:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 1349:23:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1331:21:57, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1315:21:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1301:21:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1281:21:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1260:21:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1245:21:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1230:20:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1211:20:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1195:18:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1167:07:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC) 1126:11:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC) 1097:21:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1067:00:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1050:23:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1021:17:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 977:01:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 862:16:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 758:20:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 734:Hello! Your submission of 720:01:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 661:02:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 2319:16:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 2292:00:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 2273:00:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 2258:17:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 2245:01:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 2225:23:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 2190: 2174:17:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 2152:23:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2135:07:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2121:05:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2082:00:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 2063:00:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 2049:00:12, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 2027:00:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 1998:21:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 1976:09:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 1957:21:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1940:21:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1929:20:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1909:20:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1884:20:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1861:20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1850:16:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1829:14:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1812:14:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 1137: 997: 941:23:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 900:20:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 880: 631:04:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 578: 523:WikiProject United States 501:WikiProject United States 213: 163:a Good article nomination 1791:21:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 1771:15:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 1748:Yogo FAC image challenge 1743:00:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 1676:00:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1647:and it will be added to 1567:22:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 1540:09:02, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1511:and it will be added to 1441:09:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 763:DYK for Charles M. White 691:or whether it should be 1653:Did you know? talk page 1517:Did you know? talk page 839:Did you know? talk page 745:your nomination's entry 300:National Christmas Tree 1418:article. Based on the 511: 503:and supported projects 2304:United Medical Center 2199:The Teamwork Barnstar 1551:User:Wehwalt/Sandbox6 1410:- Thanks for editing! 510: 217:The Original Barnstar 42:of past discussions. 611:Smithsonian Archives 2184:A barnstar for you! 1491:Arlington, Virginia 884:The Modest Barnstar 684:The Big Gay Musical 668:The Big Gay Musical 649:the nomination page 60:Yogo pre-FAC review 2126:This is the source 867:A barnstar for you 512: 2230: 2229: 1659: 1658: 1646: 1523: 1522: 1510: 1172: 1171: 1078:Mary Hayward Weir 1026: 1025: 983: 982: 963:Golden Wiki Award 944: 927:comment added by 905: 904: 845: 844: 832: 619: 618: 579:Who should come? 239: 238: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Tim1965 2325: 2311:Kevin Rutherford 2289: 2284: 2281: 2255: 2222: 2217: 2214: 2195: 2188: 2187: 2132: 2118: 2104:Coyle, William. 2079: 2074: 2071: 2046: 2041: 2038: 1995: 1990: 1987: 1973: 1968: 1965: 1937: 1926: 1921: 1918: 1881: 1876: 1873: 1858: 1847: 1842: 1839: 1809: 1804: 1801: 1788: 1783: 1780: 1768: 1763: 1760: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1705: 1699:, if there is a 1698: 1692: 1636: 1583: 1576: 1564: 1559: 1556: 1500: 1457: 1450: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1362: 1298: 1293: 1290: 1227: 1222: 1219: 1192: 1187: 1184: 1164: 1159: 1156: 1146:Montana articles 1142: 1135: 1134: 1123: 1118: 1115: 1091: 1044: 995: 988: 987: 979: 959: 952: 948:An award for you 943: 921: 908:Vlastimil Koubek 878: 871: 870: 822: 804:Charles M. White 791:Charles M. White 774: 767: 736:Charles M. White 733: 712: 678: 677: 593: 576: 575: 564: 559: 556: 449: 444: 441: 397: 392: 389: 345: 340: 337: 282: 277: 274: 262: 257: 254: 211: 204: 203: 119: 114: 111: 100: 95: 92: 76: 71: 68: 33: 32: 26: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2306: 2287: 2282: 2279: 2253: 2220: 2215: 2212: 2186: 2130: 2116: 2098: 2077: 2072: 2069: 2044: 2039: 2036: 1993: 1988: 1985: 1971: 1966: 1963: 1935: 1924: 1919: 1916: 1879: 1874: 1871: 1856: 1845: 1840: 1837: 1807: 1802: 1799: 1786: 1781: 1778: 1766: 1761: 1758: 1750: 1731: 1727: 1725:primary sources 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1703: 1696: 1690: 1683: 1574: 1562: 1557: 1554: 1547: 1448: 1412: 1397: 1392: 1389: 1381: 1360: 1296: 1291: 1288: 1225: 1220: 1217: 1190: 1185: 1182: 1177: 1162: 1157: 1154: 1133: 1121: 1116: 1113: 1109: 1087: 1040: 1031: 966: 964: 950: 922: 910: 869: 765: 727: 710: 679: 675: 672: 641: 615: 594: 574: 562: 557: 554: 546: 505: 447: 442: 439: 395: 390: 387: 343: 338: 335: 280: 275: 272: 260: 255: 252: 244: 202: 159: 117: 112: 109: 98: 93: 90: 74: 69: 66: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2331: 2329: 2305: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2248: 2247: 2228: 2227: 2202: 2201: 2196: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2162:Film Superlist 2155: 2154: 2097: 2095:The Ghost Ship 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1832: 1831: 1749: 1746: 1701: 1682: 1679: 1657: 1656: 1584: 1573: 1570: 1546: 1543: 1521: 1520: 1458: 1447: 1444: 1416:Louis Brownlow 1411: 1408:Louis Brownlow 1405: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1352: 1351: 1334: 1333: 1303: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1176: 1175:Conchita image 1173: 1170: 1169: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1132: 1131:Precious award 1129: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1082:Jerzy Kosinski 1070: 1069: 1035:Ernest T. Weir 1030: 1029:Ernest T. Weir 1027: 1024: 1023: 1004: 1003: 998: 996: 981: 980: 965: 962: 960: 949: 946: 912:Dear Tim1965, 909: 906: 903: 902: 887: 886: 881: 879: 868: 865: 843: 842: 833:and add it to 799:Republic Steel 775: 764: 761: 726: 723: 673: 671: 666:Nomination of 664: 640: 634: 617: 616: 597: 595: 588: 585: 584: 573: 570: 545: 542: 528: 504: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 457: 456: 455: 454: 434: 433: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 382: 381: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 243: 240: 237: 236: 220: 219: 214: 212: 201: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 158: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 127: 126: 125: 124: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2330: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2303: 2293: 2290: 2285: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2250: 2249: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2226: 2223: 2218: 2208: 2207:Yogo sapphire 2204: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2189: 2183: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2113: 2109: 2107: 2102: 2096: 2093: 2083: 2080: 2075: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2042: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 1999: 1996: 1991: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1969: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1922: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1885: 1882: 1877: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1859: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1843: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1805: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1784: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1769: 1764: 1755: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1726: 1708: 1700: 1695: 1694:BLP unsourced 1688: 1680: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1654: 1650: 1644: 1640: 1634: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1608:U.S. Congress 1606:... that the 1603: 1602: 1601: 1595: 1594: 1593:Did you know? 1589: 1585: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1560: 1552: 1545:Yogo PR draft 1544: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1518: 1514: 1508: 1504: 1498: 1494: 1492: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1469: 1468: 1467:Did you know? 1463: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1386: 1385:Yogo sapphire 1378: 1366: 1363: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1294: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1223: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1188: 1174: 1168: 1165: 1160: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1136: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1124: 1119: 1106: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1045: 1043: 1036: 1028: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 994: 989: 986: 978: 974: 970: 961: 958: 954: 953: 947: 945: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 917: 913: 907: 901: 897: 893: 889: 888: 885: 882: 877: 872: 866: 864: 863: 859: 856: 853: 849: 840: 836: 830: 826: 820: 816: 814: 810: 806: 805: 800: 794: 793: 792: 786: 785: 784:Did you know? 780: 779:28 March 2012 776: 773: 769: 768: 762: 760: 759: 755: 751: 747: 746: 741: 737: 732: 724: 722: 721: 718: 717: 714: 713: 704: 701: 696: 694: 690: 686: 685: 669: 665: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 638: 635: 633: 632: 628: 624: 612: 608: 607: 603: 602: 596: 592: 587: 586: 582: 577: 571: 569: 568: 565: 560: 551: 543: 541: 540: 536: 532: 526: 524: 520: 518: 509: 502: 498: 492: 488: 484: 479: 475: 474: 473: 472: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 453: 450: 445: 436: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 401: 398: 393: 384: 383: 380: 376: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 349: 346: 341: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 278: 269: 268: 267: 266: 263: 258: 249: 241: 235: 231: 227: 222: 221: 218: 215: 210: 205: 199: 193: 189: 185: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 172: 168: 164: 157: 154: 146: 142: 138: 133: 132: 131: 130: 129: 128: 123: 120: 115: 106: 105: 104: 101: 96: 87: 83: 82: 81: 80: 77: 72: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2307: 2198: 2161: 2124: 2110: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2012: 1898: 1751: 1732: 1684: 1668: 1660: 1628: 1622: 1615: 1605: 1598: 1597: 1591: 1548: 1532: 1524: 1488: 1481: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1465: 1433:RichardKPSun 1413: 1382: 1270: 1178: 1145: 1110: 1088: 1086: 1041: 1039: 1032: 1000: 984: 969:67.80.64.128 923:— Preceding 918: 914: 911: 883: 854: 846: 802: 796: 789: 788: 782: 743: 728: 715: 708: 705: 697: 682: 680: 670:for deletion 642: 620: 605: 600: 599: 580: 547: 531:Kumi-Taskbot 527: 517:January 2012 515: 513: 418: 293: 245: 242:Yogo reshoot 216: 160: 63: 55: 43: 37: 2131:Dr. Blofeld 2117:Dr. Blofeld 1707:BLP sources 1687:Craig Stott 1643:quick check 1588:27 May 2012 1507:quick check 1462:17 May 2012 1379:Yogo status 829:quick check 581:You should. 36:This is an 1639:here's how 1621:(pictured) 1503:here's how 1487:(pictured) 1341:Nikkimaria 1307:Nikkimaria 1252:Nikkimaria 1107:Yogo drive 892:66.87.7.36 825:here's how 801:executive 200:Good stuff 2254:Montanabw 1936:Montanabw 1857:Montanabw 1733:Regards, 1612:President 1361:Montanabw 797:... that 750:Ishtar456 1865:Tim see 1735:The-Pope 1672:contribs 1662:Casliber 1649:DYKSTATS 1536:contribs 1526:Casliber 1513:DYKSTATS 937:contribs 925:unsigned 858:contribs 848:Casliber 835:DYKSTATS 809:tear gas 711:Schmidt, 639:for DYK? 583:Really. 298:and the 2280:Pumpkin 2265:Tim1965 2237:Tim1965 2213:Pumpkin 2166:Tim1965 2144:Tim1965 2070:Pumpkin 2055:Tim1965 2037:Pumpkin 2019:Tim1965 1986:Pumpkin 1983:thread. 1964:Pumpkin 1949:Tim1965 1917:Pumpkin 1901:Tim1965 1872:Pumpkin 1838:Pumpkin 1821:Tim1965 1800:Pumpkin 1779:Pumpkin 1759:Pumpkin 1626:Titanic 1555:Pumpkin 1390:Pumpkin 1323:Tim1965 1289:Pumpkin 1273:Tim1965 1237:Tim1965 1218:Pumpkin 1203:Tim1965 1183:Pumpkin 1155:Pumpkin 1114:Pumpkin 1059:Tim1965 1013:Carrite 985:Noice! 929:Jkoubek 738:at the 693:deleted 555:Pumpkin 521:of the 483:Tim1965 440:Pumpkin 423:Tim1965 388:Pumpkin 371:Tim1965 336:Pumpkin 304:Tim1965 295:Ben-Hur 273:Pumpkin 253:Pumpkin 226:Carrite 184:Tim1965 137:Tim1965 110:Pumpkin 91:Pumpkin 67:Pumpkin 39:archive 1424:before 653:PFHLai 614:there! 330:WT:FAC 167:Sadads 1428:after 1089:Caden 1042:Caden 813:union 623:Sarah 519:issue 419:after 16:< 2315:talk 2288:talk 2269:talk 2241:talk 2221:talk 2170:talk 2148:talk 2078:talk 2059:talk 2045:talk 2023:talk 1994:talk 1972:talk 1953:talk 1925:talk 1905:talk 1880:talk 1846:talk 1825:talk 1808:talk 1787:talk 1767:talk 1739:talk 1666:talk 1610:and 1563:talk 1549:See 1530:talk 1437:talk 1426:and 1398:talk 1345:talk 1327:talk 1311:talk 1297:talk 1277:talk 1256:talk 1241:talk 1226:talk 1207:talk 1191:talk 1163:talk 1122:talk 1063:talk 1017:talk 973:talk 933:talk 896:talk 852:talk 754:talk 657:talk 645:here 627:talk 563:talk 548:See 535:talk 514:The 487:talk 448:talk 427:talk 396:talk 375:talk 344:talk 308:talk 281:talk 261:talk 230:talk 188:talk 171:talk 141:talk 118:talk 99:talk 84:See 75:talk 2283:Sky 2216:Sky 2073:Sky 2040:Sky 1989:Sky 1967:Sky 1920:Sky 1875:Sky 1841:Sky 1803:Sky 1796:PD? 1782:Sky 1762:Sky 1586:On 1558:Sky 1489:in 1460:On 1393:Sky 1292:Sky 1221:Sky 1186:Sky 1158:Sky 1117:Sky 777:On 558:Sky 443:Sky 391:Sky 339:Sky 276:Sky 256:Sky 113:Sky 94:Sky 70:Sky 2317:) 2271:) 2243:) 2172:) 2150:) 2114:♦ 2061:) 2025:) 2017:- 1955:) 1907:) 1827:) 1741:) 1728:}} 1722:{{ 1720:, 1718:}} 1714:{{ 1712:, 1710:}} 1704:{{ 1697:}} 1691:{{ 1674:) 1641:, 1590:, 1538:) 1505:, 1464:, 1439:) 1387:? 1347:) 1329:) 1313:) 1279:) 1258:) 1243:) 1209:) 1065:) 1019:) 1011:. 975:) 939:) 935:• 898:) 860:) 827:, 781:, 756:) 695:. 659:) 629:) 604:: 537:) 529:-- 489:) 429:) 377:) 310:) 250:. 232:) 190:) 173:) 165:? 143:) 2313:( 2267:( 2239:( 2168:( 2146:( 2057:( 2021:( 1951:( 1903:( 1823:( 1737:( 1669:· 1664:( 1655:. 1645:) 1637:( 1629:? 1533:· 1528:( 1519:. 1509:) 1501:( 1493:? 1435:( 1431:- 1343:( 1325:( 1309:( 1275:( 1254:( 1239:( 1205:( 1061:( 1015:( 971:( 931:( 894:( 855:· 850:( 841:. 831:) 823:( 815:? 752:( 655:( 625:( 533:( 485:( 425:( 373:( 306:( 228:( 186:( 169:( 139:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Tim1965
archive
current talk page
PumpkinSky
talk
12:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Yogo_sapphire#Pre-FA_nom_round_of_edits
PumpkinSky
talk
00:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
PumpkinSky
talk
11:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Tim1965
talk
16:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The Man Who Fell in Love with the Moon
a Good article nomination
Sadads
talk
18:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Tim1965
talk
01:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Carrite
talk
01:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#Reshoot_of_Yogo_sapphires
PumpkinSky

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.