72:
on the same direction. The least you could do is to read their comments and reply to the talk page. The only consequence will be blocking the page, which I do not think is positive for the additional information that can be provided about this company. Your input has only one objective since the beginning is to criticize this company. Please keep your negative points where it should belong, a blog or any other personal support, as wikipedia as I have understood is not dedicated to personal comments. I hope this situation will become reasonable and we can continue our editing in a certain harmony and neutrality. Again, as mentioned previously, should you find something non appropriate please use the talk page. Thanks, Sincerely,
167:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like
175:, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --
71:
Dear Bbqq11 Your attitude is far from being acceptable and you could respect at least the quality of the information that is being displayed on the page. Again, the objective is to remain as neutral as it can be. There has been several editors that have given their opinion on its talk page that goes
45:
I agree with you concerning the usage of wikipedia that it has to be used by everyone. however i do not agree on your second point - not all information should be included, only the one that are relevant within an encyclopedia type of document, in opposition to a facebook page or any other blog type
53:
Your current position is as open to criticism than if
Reolian were promoting its company through this page. This is not the case here for what I believe, you can in any case explain within the talk page what aspect you consider as actually promoting this company.
49:
As I have mentioned in the talk page that you should read, as this is key in order to build up
Knowledge (XXG)'s page, is that some of the information being inserted on the page have clearly a non neutral objective and/or are not relevant.
171:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like
139:
Hello
Airplaneman, I agree with you - neutrality could be improved here, I will have a look at the article to make it more balanced. Just give me a bit of time for that, last months have been quite busy here. Best Regards,
25:
Knowledge (XXG) is a
Encyclopedia for everyone, all information must be included. So, no need to delete any of accident that with source, REMEMBER WIKIPEDIA IS ENCYCLOPEDIA FOR EVERYONE, NOT FOR REOLIAN COMPANY
172:
160:
168:
180:
120:
98:
isn't stopping. I've pointed parties to the talk page; hopefully a fruitful discussion will be had. If not, the page may be locked.
164:
176:
87:
17:
129:
104:
95:
46:
of of support. Being part of wikipedia's development, I am sure that you agree on this aspect.
124:
99:
32:
141:
73:
57:
28:
184:
149:
134:
109:
81:
65:
36:
173:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa
Destubathon
161:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge
163:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland
8:
123:I just made on the discussion page. Cheers,
169:Knowledge (XXG):The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)
7:
165:Knowledge (XXG):The 10,000 Challenge
14:
155:Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
1:
150:07:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
185:21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
135:13:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
88:Reolian Public Transport Co.
18:Reolian Public Transport Co.
200:
177:MediaWiki message delivery
110:23:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
82:11:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
66:05:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
145:
77:
61:
37:00:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
119:Please take a look at
94:Hey, I see that the
191:
132:
127:
107:
102:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
190:
189:
188:
157:
130:
125:
117:
105:
100:
92:
22:
12:
11:
5:
197:
195:
156:
153:
116:
113:
91:
85:
69:
41:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
196:
187:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
154:
152:
151:
147:
143:
137:
136:
133:
128:
122:
114:
112:
111:
108:
103:
97:
89:
86:
84:
83:
79:
75:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
42:Dear Bbqq11,
39:
38:
34:
30:
27:
19:
16:
158:
138:
118:
93:
70:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
24:
23:
126:Airplaneman
101:Airplaneman
121:this post
159:Hi. The
96:edit war
142:Titours
115:Reolian
74:Titours
58:Titours
29:Bbqq11
181:talk
146:talk
78:talk
62:talk
33:talk
26:USE!
90:- 2
20:- 1
183:)
148:)
80:)
64:)
35:)
179:(
144:(
131:✈
106:✈
76:(
60:(
31:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.