190:
175:
have had on education in the UK and the US and concerns that affect them, I am wondering what else to include. Is it better that I change the entry to that of the community I am involved with and base it around that? I was under the impression that this was not considered good form as it would count
157:
Ok, admittedly for my first entry I was not fully aware that I would have to have a large entry to put in immediately. I was under the impression that I could put in an initial marker (in this case a definition) and then expand it with the usage of it within specific communities. I had considered
162:
but felt it better to put in a small entry that could be linked to other entries later. The delete marker was placed on very quickly and I am not sure that I will have time to put anything more than a short expansion on tonight. Other than expanding with examples of the history of the usage,
216:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
220:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
58:
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
110:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies
Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
202:
213:
126:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
131:
111:
176:
as self-advertising (if you can consider an entry for a community self-advertising). Advice or guidance on this would be appreciated.
135:
62:
39:
107:
206:
115:
42:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
20:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason:
78:
228:
122:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
142:
201:
is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to
127:
74:
70:
66:
31:
47:
223:
139:
99:
61:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
123:
77:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
55:
40:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article
197:
181:
103:
17:
234:
144:
85:
38:
basic
Knowledge (XXG) criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
138:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
130:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
118:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
106:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
163:communities that use it, the fact that the word
214:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Edugeek
171:is used to change that round, the impact the
8:
158:adding it as an extension of the entry for
54:on the top of the page and leave a note on
203:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
167:has been derogatory for a while but
25:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary.
14:
212:The article will be discussed at
116:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
188:
153:Existance of Edugeek as an entry
1:
235:16:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
102:}}" template to the article
34:, articles that do not meet
32:criteria for speedy deletion
112:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
250:
128:proposed deletion process
16:A tag has been placed on
205:or whether it should be
145:20:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
132:speedy deletion criteria
86:18:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
56:the article's talk page
136:Articles for Deletion
134:or it can be sent to
98:I have added a "{{
108:proposed deletion
241:
231:
226:
192:
191:
121:
83:
53:
52:
46:
249:
248:
244:
243:
242:
240:
239:
238:
229:
224:
193:
189:
186:
155:
119:
96:
79:
63:for biographies
50:
44:
43:
28:
12:
11:
5:
247:
245:
187:
185:
180:Nomination of
178:
154:
151:
149:
120:{{dated prod}}
95:
92:
90:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
246:
237:
236:
233:
232:
227:
218:
215:
210:
208:
204:
200:
199:
183:
179:
177:
174:
170:
166:
161:
152:
150:
147:
146:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:its talk page
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
93:
91:
88:
87:
84:
82:
76:
75:for companies
72:
68:
67:for web sites
64:
59:
57:
49:
41:
37:
33:
27:
26:
21:
19:
222:
219:
211:
196:
195:The article
194:
184:for deletion
172:
168:
164:
159:
156:
148:
97:
89:
81:Boricuaeddie
80:
60:
35:
29:
24:
23:
15:
173:edugeekers
30:Under the
71:for bands
207:deleted
198:Edugeek
182:Edugeek
169:edugeek
104:Edugeek
94:Edugeek
18:Edugeek
114:" and
48:hangon
230:amuse
225:Cind.
73:, or
165:geek
160:geek
100:prod
36:very
140:DES
209:.
69:,
65:,
51:}}
45:{{
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.