User talk:Trackteur/Archive 1

3126: 3142: 3205: 291: 4734: 31: 3158: 3190: 1515: 136: 437: 126: 4829: 3499: 346: 302: 146: 3174: 453: 2594: 1617: 313: 422: 412: 376: 186: 267: 166: 4578: 2804: 2489: 2028: 1692: 4687: 4466: 4395: 3008: 2718: 1769: 4341:

the protests in other US cities. That is fine, though I'm not sure that reliance was wise (I would have perhaps said, "Also on November 25, ..." so it was clear when the events you were describing occurred) since the heading pertains to an entire month's worth of events. In any case, it is moot now as another editor has removed the statement altogether. Let's move on from here.

474: 361: 463: 196: 4372: 4119: 3843: 1870: 1343: 1056: 1018: 241: 176: 228: 116: 106: 71: 3981: 3760: 3666: 1961: 1087: 254: 215: 156: 324: 280: 883:

be banned. I hope you're gracious that I'm telling you that- the other edits you've done to other articles are constructive and good- unlike many, many other users. Also- try to keep your same edits to a minimum- you have a tendency to make a lot of edits to the same article in a small amount of time. --

4375:

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Knowledge (XXG), please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is

2698:

More generally, you have only been an editor since March, yet in that short time have amassed a pretty substantial collection of warnings and critical comments here on your Talk page. If you want to be an active and capable editor, I strongly suggest that you slow down in your editing, take the time

2518:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

2324:

to make the same edit again; that's called edit-warring, is generally frowned on, and if kept up can lead to trouble. Instead you can start a discussion on the talk page of the article and try to persuade other editors that the edit you want to make is a helpful one. If an editor has explained in an

2057:

1721:

882:

Personal issues aside, you just did, and I don't want a response from you, just don't do anything like that again. This kind of thing has happened before in a similar manner and it's not appreciated. And you won't be able to respond to any person's nonsense if you keep doing the wrong things- you'll

853:

Oh, you're so funny. Hilarious- a genuine gut-buster. I was going to post this section before you posted that sad attempt at wit, but edit conflicts, oh how they annoy: Another thing- I believe you have tampered with these articles in a similar manner some time ago. That's right- I remember that. No

823:

Stop messing up the Grand Prix articles. The history of these articles have to be structured in a way that goes through history. What you're doing- organizing the articles in such a way that it lists the circuits used doesn't work, and the extent of the mess you've made is really quite impressive, I

2863:

Please stop changing the wordings of things. I keep having to revert your edits because they are either wrong, badly expressed or (in the case of shoving a bracketted bit into a leading statement) in the wrong place. You need to read what you are editing much more carefully than you do. The Avignon

4340:

And I acknowledge now my error in terms of dates (the US-wide protests started on 25 November – Tuesday – not 26 November, today, as I incorrectly stated earlier), and that you were saying that you were relying on the previous sentence talking about other events on Tuesday to establish the date of

2399:

Please don't move pics that are above the line. It is done in order to fit the pic in, without creating a huge break underneath the image, or pushing a major heading out of position. If you are editing on a vertical screen, you may not be aware of the layout problems that occur on wide screens.

4180:

doesn't make sense to use a French-language ref that describes a CNN report in English when, if CNN made such a report, you should be able to link to an English-language reference at CNN. Note that a reversion doesn't necessarily imply you have done something wrong or that anyone thinks you have,

3251:

a general image of the site that mainly shows a building in an entirely different style is not the tiniest bit relevant to discussing the form, structure, and style of Romanesque architecture. In fact, it is very counter-productive for someone who doesn't know the subject. You may not be aware of

2400:

I'm very particular about layout, and generally try to avoid gaps. It all becomes mor difficult when the image, like the statue of David, is tall. There is a problem which the MOS for picture layout does not address, because the instructions are devised very simplistically for absolute beginners.

1848:

to preserve the readability and flow of a sentence are perfectly acceptable. If it is to be worded "Hill of Tara" it at least needs a definite article, but in the context of the article "Tara" is better. The article is titled "Hill of Tara" to distinguish it from other things called Tara, but the

4253:

Unfortunately, despite years of grade school training in French, I have to rely on machine translation, which gives me this: "Just a detail for the form, which was introduced by me is in Section November 2014, following what is already described as of November 25" -- which doesn't really seem to

2429:

When positioned under the relevant heading, it has the effect of causing a great big gap in the text. That is the reason it is above the content. It is a matter of being pragmatic. It can't be optimised for a vertical screen, so it is made to work as well as possible on an ordinary laptop.

758:

size your picture at 300 px. The pictures in the article may have been carefully selected to follow a certain visual style e.g. every picture may be horizontal, because of restricted space; every picture might be taken from a certain source, so they all match. Make sure your picture

4077:"CGIAR ceased to be a consultative group. Therefore, ‘CGIAR’ is no longer an acronym that stands for the ‘Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research’. Consequently, ‘CGIAR’ should never be spelled out or translated, but promoted as a recognizable name in itself" 2367:, and try to persuade other editors that your ideas are correct; you'd need to make a strong case for either of those two. There's a lot of advice to you on this page; please try to take notice of some of it. You don't want to get to the point where your edits are seen as 1406:

I think they have a point, it's better to focus on expanding the history section with more detailed information and cover more historical milestones, and then when the history section is filled with more text, we can consider re-adding some thinkers pictures, so that the

3551:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 4181:

only that someone (me in this case) thinks it could be done much better. I would have done it myself – IF I could have found the particular CNN report that referred to 37 states. I assumed you had the URL for that report, since you were the one mentioning it.

2329:, you can quote that as a starting-point for the discussion, and show why it is wrong. In that particular case, I've started the discussion for you, though it really isn't important enough to be worth discussing. Anyway, please take BRD to heart. Good luck, 4130:

in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the

2842:

you added an unnecessary maintenance tag. You make some good edits, but a lot of bad ones, and other editors (as well as bots) have to follow you around and check each one to make sure they are sound. If you keep this up you may well end up blocked.

824:

must say. Some of the titles you've used with nearly all of the individual years listed are also way way way too long as well. So you've been warned- if you do anything like that again, I'm reporting you. Try me, and you'll find out what happens. --

3115:

about ten days ago, that I have just discovered. You will notice that one of the sections of my guide for new users concerns images. I'm going to tell you in detail why I removed the image, so that you are more aware of what to look out for.

1385:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a 2205:

have unfortunately been in contravention to the MOS, which in itself if fine, but you keep reverting other editors when they restore the MOS versions, which is not so fine. Additionally please use edit summaries on all your edits as per

3125: 4323:. I have referred you to a Knowledge (XXG) policy; if you think it's appropriate to reply by continuing to insult me, I have concerns for your long-term future as a Knowledge (XXG) editor, in particular concerning your ability to 2467:

You really need to ease off on that article. Your most recent edit, removing "President" from a sentence discussing George Washington, removed an important piece of contextual information, and with no explanation at all.

2786:

garbled a straightforward sentence and appeared to change its meaning. Please take greater care with your edits. Continuing to make destructive edits, even if you are acting in good faith, risks getting you blocked.

2294:, without too many patches of foreign crops for disturbing the sense of good day's work achievement. Wait sometimes just a day or two, do not please exceed your involvement without enough of a good reason for tales. -- 699:

any change about which you are uncertain, by placing your proposed text, or just a suggestion, on the talk page. Someone who watches the article will usually answer in a day or so. You can monitor this by clicking the

4274:

Also, I don't particularly care for using "programmed" Talk page messages to communicate with editors of any level of accomplishment, but your edit above requires me to mention the policy in the message below.

2663:

I have asked you repeatedly to ease up in your editing of that page - several of your edits have been ungrammatical, or incorrect, or unconstructive, and have had to be reverted. By way of example, we have

3881:

I don't know what you're trying to do here, but you should check your edit with the "Show preview" button before saving the page, to make sure you haven't corrupted the table. Use the sandbox if necessary.

4238:

Juste un detail, pour la forme, ce qui a été introduit par mes soins est dans la section November 2014, à la suite de ce qui est déjà décrit à la date du November 25. If you want the translation, write me

3230:

of a building, not a whole building. A door, a vault, some cloister columns, a tower, a window. Your image didn't follow through with the theme of the gallery, which is quite easy to see, if you look.

941:

It's hard for anyone to believe those intentions of yours when you were still edit-warring with Falcadore. That's a very frowned-upon practice not just on this wiki, but on any wiki on the internet. --

3259:

Let me suggest that you take a good look around that page, read the headings of the sections, and the captions underneath, and understanding how images can be used thematically to enhance an article.

912:

and discuss it. Please do not try and force your edit into the article, the back and forth can go on foever and the editors just get banned. Talk it up on the talk page. It is what it is there for. --

1032:

or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge (XXG), please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the

2452:

Please stop making non-grammatical, awkward edits to Washington, DC. I've had to change several back in the past few minutes, having already raised at least one of them on the Talk page. Thanks.

789:

If your picture seems to fill a real identifiable need in the article, but doesn't fit well, because of formatting or some other constraint, then put it on the talk page and discuss, before adding.

3509: 3252:

this, but the greater part of the ancient abbey church at Cluny has gone. Further down the page is an image of that tower that is peeping over the top of the later building, in the section

1392:

Don't keep adding the pictures without discussing it. Several editors have agreed that they are not needed in the article. We don't need pictures of every person mentioned in the article.

734:

to see if the subject of your image is already covered. Don't duplicate subject matter already present. Don't delete a picture just to put in your own, unless your picture is demonstrably

4195:

Then I think if you have references in English, it should not being bothered. C.a.d. en français : je pense alors que si vous avez les références en anglais, il ne faut pas vous géner.

2699:

to read up on various Knowledge (XXG) policies and procedures (several of which have already been pointed out to you), and learn a bit more about how to edit constructively. Thanks.

1033: 85: 795:

that adding a picture may substantially change the layout of the article. Your addition may push another picture out of its relevant section or cause some other formatting problem.

2864:

edit was a stuff-up. The changing of St Peter, the man, to St Peter's Basilica, the building, was a stuff up. Creating links is a useful thing to do, if you do it thoughtfully.

3517: 2355:

Yes, I saw that and undid it. I suggest you wait until you have a lot more experience here before you move any more high-profile pages without discussion, as you did with both

854:

one cares what you think these articles should be or what your feelings are towards editing- because they are not good or constructive edits. Once again- you've been warned. --

2344:

Hi! Thank you for the advice now that you have opened the discussion page of this article, expect further notice as you required. It's me who proceeded to rename the article

2629: 2210:, almost none of your edits leave a summary forcing people to go into them to figure out what has changed when a summary would allow people to know what the edit was about. 1652: 259: 253: 4560:

I suggest that you self-revert, as you have breached 3RR already. Otherwise, you will be reported to the administration noticeboard and likely blocked for edit warring. -

4225:

that these protests were said to have occurred (it was 26 November when they started -- everything else in that paragraph currently talks about events on 25 November).

207: 3141: 621: 4176:. My point stands that a) this is en:Wiki, so it does not make sense to provide references in French if equivalent references in English are available; and b) it 3321: 2617:

with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge (XXG)'s

1640:

with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge (XXG)'s

3317: 1248:

The problem now is that paragraph related images are way down from the paragraphs they were supposed to assist, I'll see if someone can solve this problem at

4254:

address my concern that you are saying that (a source says that) protests occurred in 37 states, but not saying accurately when (what night) they occurred.

3933: 3618: 3450: 3345: 3305: 3247:

Yes, Cluny Abbey is important for the establishment of the Cluniac order and the spread of their type of building. That is why it is mentioned in the text.

2910: 2151: 1585: 1464: 1454: 3189: 1534: 3369: 2352:. Thank you wait until the end of the discussion before undo a new time this last change. Good luck to you too. Trackteur (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 1885:

with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

1362:

another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is usually seen as obstructing the

3341: 1450: 466: 462: 4122:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to

3365: 1036:

which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use

4418:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge (XXG)'s

2741:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge (XXG)'s

1788:

with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Knowledge (XXG)'s

1366:, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 404: 2535: 2074: 1738: 4217:

reported that CNN reported that protests were organized in 37 states ..." (obviously a troublesome phrasing) since the only source provided is at

2950: 149: 145: 2628:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

1651:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

3157: 2726: 2316:

Hi! I see you're fairly new here. Everyone knows it's hard to get started, so well done for sticking at it. I'd like to draw your attention to

4778: 3532: 2946: 2141: 1064: 3929: 3614: 3577:

but since you're new to the page and have made several unhelpful minor tweaks today, please discuss the next one(s) at the article talk page

3446: 3301: 2906: 2147: 1581: 1460: 4072: 2926: 1575: 1327:

as they add nothing whatsoever to the readers understanding of the subject, as has already been explained to you at the Help Desk. Thanks -

3164: 1381:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 1063:

article on 24 March 2014 as it constitutes over-linking. The guidelines regarding linking to other articles is to limit to one time in the

1021: 801:

before adding. Some pictures will look much better, or fit an article more appropriately if they are cropped to show the relevant subject.

199: 195: 2137: 986: 4429:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

2752:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

1799:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge (XXG)'s

2922: 1571: 1297:

Hello, I saw your change immediately canceled by a nasty contributor, I will cancel the change because now there is no more image file.

712:

that an addition inserted between two sentences or paragraphs that are linked in meaning can turn the existent paragraphs into nonsense.

3294:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3173: 2899:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

415: 411: 272: 266: 3233:

Every image in the set is a similar shape (vertical, not square or landscape). This isn't essential, but it does look good that way.

1974: 4784: 4517: 4377: 4209:

You are the one introducing the information, hence it is your responsibility to locate and provide references that support it (see

3540: 3059: 2527: 2066: 1730: 456: 452: 306: 301: 499: 2838:

colloquial names for various capital regions without a source and with the perfunctory explanation that they were "unnecessary";

169: 165: 3851: 3523:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

2376: 2334: 1874: 89: 4792: 4694: 4686: 4589: 4529: 4485: 4423: 4399: 4127: 3071: 3027: 2815: 2746: 2722: 2622: 2618: 2602: 2543: 2144:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2082: 1793: 1773: 1746: 1645: 1641: 1625: 1578:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1457:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 179: 175: 96:, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. 4642:

article about a shooting incident from this article, nor would that be appropriate; therefore we will not link to this one.

3926:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3611:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3443:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3298:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2903:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4762: 4533: 3075: 2547: 2086: 1750: 524: 233: 227: 4711: 3204: 1099: 648: 3536: 2637: 1660: 1682: 4796: 4741: 4583: 4539: 4442: 3548: 3081: 2809: 2765: 2645: 2506: 2364: 2045: 1812: 1709: 1668: 1386: 1378: 328: 323: 4213:), though I would have done so if I could have found them. As it stands right now, your edit should read that "French 4415: 3544: 3295: 2900: 2738: 2614: 1785: 1637: 1363: 630: 594: 4702: 3918:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3603:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3586: 3561: 3431:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2884: 2372: 2330: 2128:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1562:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1441:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1371: 612: 38: 1934:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

908:. It can get you suspended from Knowledge (XXG). If you have an issue bring it up on the relevant talk page, like 4626: 4477: 4403: 4123: 2218: 1942: 1823: 4758: 4750: 4525: 4497: 4473: 3528: 3067: 3039: 3015: 2539: 2511: 2500: 2078: 2050: 2039: 1742: 1714: 1703: 1382: 1351: 1347: 379: 375: 119: 115: 109: 105: 2098: 1067:

and once in the main part of the article plus in tables if helpful. There is more information in this article:

4126:, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Knowledge (XXG) has some 1845: 4805: 4005:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3784:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3690:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3604: 3112: 1985:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1892: 1110:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1076: 1045: 957: 909: 813: 3236:

The headings all tell you what the picture represents "portal, vault, cloister...." and the exact location.

2368: 1178:

article? The pictures were next to the paragrafs they refered to. That's pretty standard on wikipedia, see

523:

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to

493: 295: 290: 155: 4658: 3313: 3196: 3180: 538:

for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put

4788: 4521: 4489: 4481: 4438: 3063: 3031: 3023: 2761: 2680:, in which you mis-identified the role of these persons at the time of the actions being discussed and - 2641: 2640:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through 2570: 2531: 2070: 1808: 1734: 1664: 1663:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through 1533:, a community-written newspaper about the English Knowledge (XXG) and larger Wikimedia community. Please 1367: 1313: 1249: 1216: 994: 430: 426: 421: 349: 345: 317: 312: 4302: 3582: 3557: 2880: 1897: 1854: 1424: 1408: 1355: 1324: 1320: 1287: 1257: 1223: 1187: 1175: 1168: 4324: 3524: 1528: 1068: 990: 585: 364: 360: 246: 240: 129: 125: 3553:

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

2092:

You have been repeatedly warned about edit warring. The message does not appear to be getting through.

4716: 4037: 3887: 3883: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3847: 3811: 3733: 2269: 2211: 2018: 1935: 1917: 1816: 1567: 1142: 4419: 4132: 3859: 2742: 2415:

Excuse me, I do not have a wide screen and I moved just to put it in front of the relevant section.

1789: 1037: 905: 529: 220: 214: 4846: 4666:

belonged there? Please consider carefully before adding links between otherwise unrelated pages.

4310: 4244: 4200: 4155: 4102: 4052: 3964: 3901: 3826: 3748: 3649: 3481: 3412: 3337: 3279: 2993: 2844: 2819: 2788: 2769: 2700: 2685: 2649: 2574: 2551: 2469: 2453: 2420: 2299: 2277: 2247: 2236: 2182: 2113: 2094: 1902: 1495: 1442: 1302: 1272: 1238: 1206: 1157: 1002: 966: 932: 917: 873: 844: 514: 47: 17: 4210: 715:

that a lengthy addition or the creation of a new sub-section can add inappropriate weight to just

4800: 4606: 4593: 4455: 4024:

File:Revisions to US Oil Reserves 2011.png|left|thumb|Although US proved oil reserves grew by 3.8

3361: 3264: 2869: 2848: 2823: 2792: 2773: 2704: 2689: 2653: 2578: 2555: 2473: 2457: 2435: 2405: 2258: 1198: 1179: 1072: 1041: 942: 884: 855: 825: 809: 576: 555: 390: 4492:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

3713:

alabaster "alabaster"], ''Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary''

3034:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

1878: 78: 4709: 4566: 4550: 4298: 4087: 3949: 3634: 3527:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

3466: 3393: 2974: 2167: 1928: 1882: 1601: 1480: 1332: 677:

the article to see if what you want to add or remove is appropriate, necessary, or adds value.

503: 3862:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 639: 284: 279: 4768: 4140: 2598: 2496: 2262: 1922: 1850: 1678: 1420: 1397: 1316: 1283: 1253: 1219: 1183: 946: 888: 859: 829: 4437:

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through

4430: 4172: 3704:] 1.5 to 2), while the calcite kind is too hard to be scratched in this way Mohs hardness 3 2760:

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through

2753: 2317: 2198: 1912: 1807:

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through

1800: 1282:

Well actually I opted for using the gallery feature, see if the page display is better now.

603: 542:

on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click

4733: 4033: 4029: 3985: 3807: 3803: 3764: 3729: 3725: 3670: 2014: 2010: 1965: 1543: 1138: 1134: 1091: 159: 2207: 4828: 3858:

because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the

3710:, although it does yield readily to a knife. Moreover, the calcite alabaster, being a ], 2573:

to make sure you are not adding unnecessary or unwanted wikilinks to various articles.

4842: 4754: 4407: 4306: 4240: 4196: 4151: 4098: 4048: 3960: 3897: 3822: 3744: 3645: 3574: 3513: 3477: 3408: 3376: 3275: 3090: 3019: 2989: 2942: 2730: 2606: 2515: 2416: 2349: 2295: 2273: 2232: 2178: 2109: 2054: 1777: 1758: 1718: 1699: 1629: 1621: 1491: 1359: 1298: 1268: 1234: 1202: 1153: 1029: 998: 962: 928: 913: 869: 840: 693:

Use the "Show Preview" to make sure that what you have done is appropriate and correct.

543: 3498: 1514: 1267:

Thank you, if you think that my modifictions are not good, do not hesitate to remove.

4597: 4446: 3940: