User talk:Transity

613:

path myself). If you like, if I decide to move forward, I can let you know as well. I also believe it is acceptable to alert other users who have previously debated the subject at hand - in this case, Ratel's behavior. I would look at the WQA to get an idea of who those users might be, as well as possibly the diffs provided in those comments as they might lead to other interested parties who have debated his behavior in a forum other than our recent WQA (again, I think this is an acceptable approach). As a note, I feel that any notification of an RfC should be a

1838:"A secondary source in medicine summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources, usually to provide an overview of the current understanding of a medical topic. Literature reviews, systematic review articles and specialist textbooks are examples of secondary sources, as are position statements and literature reviews by major health organizations. A good secondary source from a reputable publisher will be written by an expert in the field and be editorially or peer reviewed. Do not confuse a scientific review (the thing) with peer review (the activity)." 4626: 1690:

I didn't get around to saying before I vamoosed, be careful using gaming sites as reliable sources for issues of law - they might be reliable about games and gaming news, but that doesn't make them qualified to comment on the legality of ethics of trademark usage/abusage. I think the article could benefit by explaining in more general terms that games developers are angered by his actions rather than picking over all the things that those angry games developers are complaining about.

2465: 1301: 28: 3166:, as you mentioned above. Stating that I was editing with an agenda and deleting things that didn't mesh with that agenda is not assuming good faith. I fully disagree with you that it is not up to you to justify your reversion, when the guideline says that it is up to you, and I fully disagree that it comes even close to gaming the system. Either way, I look forward to your response on the talk page, so that we can move forward. 102: 67: 74: 3842:. I would first like to thank you. I'll put the table in as soon as I have some time. However, due to the fact that Silver Reef still has people in it, and some of the most popular ghost towns do have people in them, I have changed my mind about the demographics section and would like to make one. Is there a 2000 Census number for Silver Reef, and can you find anything about Silver Reef's demographics? Thanks! 3688: 4751: 1525: 587:

continued behavior (as evidenced in your further dealings on the IC discussion) require the attention of others, perhaps one or the other of us might be able to find additional users to assist in the filing of the RfC. Feel free to reply here or on my Talk page regarding this issue. (And good luck on the IC Talk page - I'm not sure what more I can do to help matters there, unfortunately.)

2532:. If you ever decide to come back, I'd suggest reading up on the ground rules here so that you understand why what you did here is not acceptable. While you may think that I reverted you because of some massive disconnect in our worldviews (which certainly exists, based on your edits), the truth is that, despite the fact that the articles you edited are doubtlessly monitored by those who 3075:, then you should have justified their inclusion, not revert the change wholesale. At the point of the edit, there were no "other editors actively engaged in a dialog on the article's talk page" about the links, so I'm not sure who you are talking for. However, again, per WP:EL the onus is on the people adding/restoring links to justify their inclusion, not the person removing the link. 4028:(undent) I think for now, stick with the sentence you mentioned, and in the mean time, we keep looking for the more recent information. If we can just source the fact that as of 2000 the numbers are now grouped with Leeds (for example), then we can mention that and link to the Leeds demographics section for further information. There must be a way to find that out. I'll keep looking. 2892: 2121:. Your comments and the scope of your edits make it sound like you are writing on behalf of this company, and that is strongly discourage on Knowledge. If your company truly becomes notable, then others will be compelled to write about it. You should seriously consider your motivations before you contribute to articles on subjects that you are directly connected to. Thank you. -- 58: 1880:

Academies (including the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences), the British National Health Service, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), and the World Health Organization." You site doesn't qualify for either, as far as I can see. Your site appears to be more like a less-known version of WebMD.

3446: 3370: 3273: 335:. This is the problem. One can not address an issue on another article and simply delete a section by addressing it there. But I am sure you were unaware of it. What you can do, is to do the same discussion in the talk page of common cold by opeining a new section and naming it "Alternative treatment for common cold". Then you can modify the text under that section, but still, 1254: 1811:) as your actions could well constitute spamming, despite the aim of your site. I think you would agree that you desire more hits for your site, and that adding links to Knowledge would likely mean more hits. Whether or not you are selling something, you are serving your own agenda by adding these promotional links. In addition, there are guidelines for what sources are 43: 4366: 3049:

large-scale deletions like the ones your made without at least some sort of discussion (or at least make one change per edit with a clear edit summary to make it obvious why you removed each item, and to allow individual reverts instead of bulk ones). They almost always end up getting reverted, even on articles less controversial than this one. Thanks.

4503: 87: 316:

with you, but I should mention that we can not just delete a section and add out self idea. The section that you deleted also had references. What you can do, is you add your statement with its citation to the previouse section but please do not delete statements from the articles without a solid discussion. I appreciate your attention

1426:

author's willingness to actually engage in a discussion that caused me to assume good faith - most of the time, disputed CSDs are never defended at all, and a willingness to discuss the issues usually makes me want to pause to hear the arguments. Thanks for the nod, and for taking the time to explain why you were doing what you did. --

1405:. I did a brief search and found nothing whatever that gave me any confidence that the individuals have anything other than a YouTube account and a desire for self-promotion. Nevertheless, you were doing things the way that I would like to do them myself on my better days, and I thought it deserved to be recognized. 1957:, which means it will not be deleted prior to August 10. You are free to either try to improve the article and address the issues that have been raised prior to that date, or you are allowed to simply remove the dated prod tag (leaving the other tags in place), and that will end the request for proposed deletion. 458:

within the parameters of WP. If I sink to their level, that's clearly no good. If I ignore them, I might as well not even try to improve an article with an editor like this "camped out." And I can't spend all my time in WQAs and RfCs - that's both a waste of time, and no fun at all. Do you have any advice? --

4075:

I don't think you can go wrong either way at this point. I think Silver Reef itself is gone. Having a few residents doesn't make it "not a ghost town," in my opinion (and according to the working definitions I've seen and used on Knowledge). I also think it qualifies as an Unincorporated Community as

3646:

bit when I chopped the other source as it seems quite apt and descriptive (I worked in the area back in the 70s on Red Mtn.) and non-controversial. The erosional features of Harshaw Creek drainage with headward erosion into the Patagonias and the west margin of the San Rafael dominate my mental image

2065:

Specifically, you are leaning almost exclusively on the website of the company that is the subject of the article which is not a reliable source, and on search results which are not supposed to be used (and which show only hits from the Stay Thirsty site). If these are the only sources you have, then

1794:

I have already removed the links that were clearly not acceptable, such as inline links to your site in the text of articles, double links in the refs and the external links, and overly-local statements that didn't belong in the articles. I have left most other links alone, though others have removed

1758:

Hello Transity. I appreciate your email. I am with an organization that includes nearly 20,000 medical doctors, and as you might imagine, anything we have on our website is reviewed from a medical perspective by specialists in those areas. While I understand your concern that this looks like spam,

586:

accusations. I'm also admittedly new here, and despite my aptitude for research (which, as we all know, clearly indicates that I am a sockpuppet), I wouldn't mind a more experienced user or two taking the helm on this. If you agree that Ratel's behavior, his refusal to cooperate in the WQA, and his

581:

Hi, Transity - I placed a "final" note on the WQA regarding Ratel, explaining my intention to look into filing an RfC concerning him. I know you've expressed that you don't wish to spend all your time on WQAs and RfCs, but as far as I can see, one user alone can't pursue an RfC against another user.

4781:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

4387:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

3131:

In short, you took an axe to an article, and then you expected other editors to use a scalpel to correctly parse your good edits from your bad ones. I'm sorry, but that doesn't hold water at all. Now I suggest we stop wasting time in this pointless discussion on my talk page, and instead concentrate

2990:

Sure thing. You took an axe to the EL section, with vague and general edit summaries as your explanations. You were reverted by another editor and asked to discuss your sweeping edits, and you reverted back with no discussion. I again reverted your changes, and again asked you to discuss them on the

1689:

Didn't think I could handle the wikistress at the moment :). On the trademark front, I think I corrected the main error which was why I decided to remove the disputed template. Just look out for things like "world trademark", which probably means "trademark rights in many countries". Also, one thing

1645:

Hi. Just wanted to drop you a line to make absolutely clear that my decision to take the Edge article off my watchlist had nothing to do with you. It was while investigating the stuff about his directorship with the gaming association that I realised I did not want to be involved. Best of luck! Hope

843:

No problem. If it keeps happening (it seems like this guy has made this edit to your talk page three times thus far), revert the vandalism, then warn him on his talk page. I already added a first-level vandalism warning for the one I reverted, as well as a second level personal attack warning. If he

612:

I think we should each decide, on our own, if we feel that proceeding with an RfC is the right way to go. If you decide to do so, I am asking that you please post a friendly notice here letting me know that you have moved forward (as I am an interested party, and as I have expressed interest in that

602:

Scramblecase - I've looked through policies to see what is appropriate with regard to this kind of discussion, and I have to say I'm uncertain what's okay and what is not. I have expressed (on the WQA) my observations about Ratel's behavior as well as my interest in a possible RfC, so I believe your

457:

on his talk page, and stated that nothing he said on IC/PBS was off-topic. Again, I'm still glad I redacted my off-topic text. But - and I mean this in all sincerity, so please understand these aren't meant as insults, but just observations - I don't know how to deal with someone behaving like Ratel

1668:

Objectively, I understand why you decided to back off. As I said, I found the page doing recent change patrol, as it was in the process of being repeatedly vandalized in the wake of the first report of the Mobigames issue. Since then, there has been a pretty constant stream of everything from waves

1396:

I just wanted to note your good work in trying to help the creator of this article; you definitely assumed good faith and tried to help, but I came across the article in the course of assessing another article for speedy deletion and I have to say that I cannot imagine that the article will ever be

1125:

as well) My best guess is that your ISP assigns IP addresses dynamically, and every 1+ days, you get a new IP address from them. At the time the vandalism was taking place, you had a different IP. Today you had this one, and since your autologin had expired, you saw the message left for the IP user

1016:

I have added some new sections below which have come from various talk pages in recent days but all realted in some way to the dyslexia project. So I have added them all below, in the hope that we can all begin to add our own input as one person working alone can cause also sorts of problems as can

914:

Unfortunately the other editor who have been repeatedly undoing my work has no idea what Otitis Media is and even less what otitis media with effusion is. The same editor has lso no idea what dyslexia is and so it totoally unqualified to know that about how otitis media with effusion can be a cause

735:

I would like the HealthyED brand to be included in Knowledge. It has high street retail distribution and is both clinically test and proven. The sale of the raw herb is government controlled and it is processed into pill form under strict UK manufacturing standards. The product helps men overcome a

496:

Insist that the highest quality sources be strictly followed and try to find compromise wording is unfortunately the best advice I have. Calling in other editors (via RfC or the several noticeboards) can help, especially if those who answer are more interested in the encyclopedia than the POV. This

4289:

List of MyOwnEmailShow characters i am trying to make a Wiki for my YouTube Show ok that is it i am make pages and linking them together so it would be cleaner the to just have it all on one page so please just help me and let me do what i need to do im not a dad guy i am just a guy trying to get

4256:

3097:

No, I disagree. When I saw your mass deletes, I saw a number of things that, on their face, were improper. To me, it seemed that you were editing with an agenda, and deleting those things that didn't mesh with that agenda - trying to find reasons to remove the links you didn't like. In a case like

3018:

better to check for another URL before simply deleting the link. I think you would agree. It is also possible that the link was only temporarily broken. Again, since your only comments were the brief edit summaries for your changes, it isn't easy to tell what is really meant by a dead link here. I

2549:

If you cool down, take the time to actually look at your edits. Half of them added unsourced, POV, opinions to articles (those in support of the paranormal), and the other half removed statements claiming that they were unsourced (those skeptical of the paranormal). There's no internal consistency

2371:

I'm trying to add the GNIS ref (and associated information) to the articles I'm looking at in Utah, do some general copy-editing if needed, and I'll take a stab at assessing the unassessed articles as well (which, I think, are all articles you've worked on). If you see anything I change/add/delete

2089:

Thank you for your comments. While we may differ on the notability issue, we understand your position regarding deletion. We will not further object and reserve the right to revisit an article on this subject at a future date when additional secondary sources are available. Thank you. Srl40214

1879:

Actually, by "secondary sources" they are referring to "Literature reviews, systematic review articles and specialist textbooks are examples of secondary sources, as are position statements and literature reviews by major health organizations." Major health organizations include "the U.S. National

1425:

for taking the time to spell out your thought process here. You were right, of course, to re-tag for speedy delete. The author had plenty of time to show reliable sources and notability, and it was time to re-tag (it was on my watchlist, and I likely would have done so shortly). I guess it was the

1202:

I just wanted to mention that I looked at the two articles, Fairbank and Charleston, Arizona, that you requested input on. They both look really good. There hasn't been a lot of activity on the Ghost Town Wikiproject lately and it's good to see new contributions to the project. Keep up the good

315:

was reverted, since there was no solid discussion on "Alternative treatment for common cold" on the talk page of this article as you mentioned there is, in your "edit summary". In your edit, you deleted a large section and just claimed that such treatment does not exist. Well, although I may agree

4102:

I've added some links to the Discussion page to answer some of your questions about notability and other references. As I attend the church (and my spouse works there), it would probably be best for proper POV for another member to excerpt this information. But it's there, in books for a national

2850:

Actually, I didn't notice it was a quote at first, either. Then I saw the trailing quotation mark, and wondered where the quote started. So I agree entirely that the quote should be easier to see, or else the entire section should be reworded to use less of the quote. I took a stab at that in the

2522:

and my changes to those edits speak for itself. That thing I'm "enforcing" is Knowledge policy, by the way. I don't know what response you got from others as a result of your edits, but every time I reverted you or changed what you wrote, I supplied a clear indication of what policy I thought you

875:

If I'm around, I will gladly help you with reporting him if you like. I'll also keep an eye on him as a known vandal. I know it sounds like a big pain in the ass to have to go through in order to stop someone from vandalizing your talk page, but it's the best way to stop the vandalism. Above all,

3976:

For Silver Reef, that would include a demographics section that includes the historical census data, the more recent 1990 census data, and a discussion of some of the speculated population numbers that are often found in books and other less quantitative accounts. It would be great to know where

3862:

No problem. I picked up a used copy of the Moffat book a while back for about $ 6, and it's helped to fill in a lot of population data for these old ghost towns. Unfortunately, the book only shows numbers up until 1990. When I checked the Census web site, I couldn't find any numbers for 2000 (or

3662:

I'm with you. I liked the old language better than the "jutting mountains" bit, and I agree the old description (lush areas interspersed with areas of exposed rock with little soil cover) seemed pretty much spot on for the region. I'll keep poking around for a source that bears that out a little

1924:

There was an error in the blanking of this page. It was not intended. An email was sent to you via the Knowledge email system with an explanation of this article. If it is not in your Knowledge email, please let me know and I will resend. I believe this page should not be deleted. Thank you,

582:

I'm reluctant to ask (or include, unasked) Collect in these proceedings, as his presence seems to distract from the issue of Ratel's behavior; I, myself, may be "poison" to the proceedings at this point, as you are the only user I've thus far encountered who shares my opinion of the ridiculous

431:

Complete. There were some spots where striking things would have concealed a substantive point, so I may have left a few things that I otherwise would have removed. It also made me see that, towards the end (the last few days), my frustration was showing a lot more than it had been before. Good

4594:

experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a

3995:

I like that. I'll try to work with that when I get some time (I'll be fairly busy most of today). I have one concern, though. The difference between Silver Reef and the ghost towns you mentioned is that Silver Reef still has a few current residents. Therefore, demographics should look like any

958:

I get what you're trying to do, dolfrog, but you have to work within the policies of Knowledge. An article that doesn't mention dyslexia at all and which has no easily discerned connection to dyslexia generally isn't a good candidate for the dyslexia category. And if you just show up and add a

417:

I've been trying to discuss content all along, I just haven't had much luck. I admit that, at times, I was unable to resist the temptation to respond in kind to the insults that started immediately upon my arrival, and for that I apologize to those stuck reading the off-topic comments. I agree

1021:

the discusion page of the main project article you will see revise project template, the changes on the tamplate is the addition of a Project pages section, which includes the orinal project pages and the new STAGE TWO page which is hopefuly the new starting point. the STAGE TWO page has the

4047:

Alright. I'll do as you said, and start the demographics section. I'll also keep a lookout for both 2000 Census data for Silver Reef and a source that says Silver Reef's population is included in Leeds. One last question, though. Should we change the label of Silver Reef from ghost town to

3048:

can be pretty open to interpretation, though, and it intentionally leaves some room for exceptions, so the cases may not be as clear cut as you'd like. Keep that in mind, and make your case on the talk page. I'll agree with you if your case is strong. And as a piece of advice, try to avoid

4126:. I can barely keep up with the amount of edits coming through, let alone warn the editors too. I'm pretty sure some information and references have got lost in all the reverting, so someone will have to find the last clean version at some point. I requested the article be protected at 1085:

June 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did to Common cold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Transity (talk • contribs) 20:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

4460:). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely 3615:

That works. I've removed the ref to the 1910 USGS report as it was also about the Harshaw mine in the Santa Ritas. Didn't seem to be much content based on it - you might check tho'. What nerve them old miners had to use the same name in two different mountain ranges :) Cheers,

3013:

Regarding your two specific issues, I have no desire to include dead links in any article. However, did you check to see if the links could be found at another URL? Since you didn't say anything about that when you made your edits, I assumed that you did not. As such, it is

4103:

audience, written over a 10 year period, and the stuff is available on Amazon and is searchable on Amazon, so it does not have to be purchased. This should help. Let me know what you think, as I thought your tagging of the article was proper without these "new" references.

1847:

The Pennsylvania Medical Society is the largest health organization in Pennsylvania for physicians. The peer-reviewed information that we publish on our websites falls within Wiki's guidelines for reliable sources of medical articles. Thus I believe it passes muster.

3863:

later, as that site sometimes also shows estimates from in between more recent surveys). I think a demographics section is a great idea - I just don't know where to tell you to look for the recent data. I will do some more poking, and let you know if I find anything.

1669:

of simple vandalism, to vandalism plastering Nazi images and text all over the article, to repeated insertions of BLP violations. In addition, the page was a clear vanity page when all this started, so it's been a real challenge getting it into even semi-decent shape.

4667: 3338:

I agree completely. I AFDed this article a while back, but it appeared again. I didn't want to seem like I was crusading against it, so I edited it, and left it to see if someone else would AFD. I will weigh in at the AFD discussion when I get a chance. Thanks.

3515:

The 1910 USGS map on the "Harshaw, Arizona" page is incorrect. Although there is a mine on it called "Harshaw", it is not the same as the town of the same name. The town is located some 20 miles to the south. I live in Patagonia and am familiar with the area.

3571:

Thanks for catching that. I am planning to take the scale off of the larger map - I just haven't had a chance to do it yet. The large map itself is too big, I think, for this purpose (though I did load it, and it is available on the Commons page for Harshaw).

3044:. I've long since given up the notion that science and reason trump Knowledge guidelines, so if there's a link that violates a Knowledge policy, I'll agree that it should be removed, regardless of whether the link is in line with or against my personal views. 2391:

Hi Transity, Please teach me how to improve! I do not see anything wrong with it and i have cited the references. Can you please point out which exact word you see as violating WP? I can start fixing from there, and you are also welcome to edit it. Thank you.

1464:

confused! Now the page redirects to a baseball player...? My advice would be to work on the page in a sandbox, then publish it when you're ready. Putting it out there as such a short stub (sub-stub, really) makes it hard to see that it should be kept. Thanks.

2323:

I also wanted to say thanks for providing an always-needed second set of eyes on many of the articles I've worked on. Some of the information on these old towns can be pretty tough to pin down, and it's good to know that I'm not writing in a vacuum. So thank

1348:

There's an old riddle: Which weighs more, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers? Of course they weigh the same. Then, you say, what about an ounce of gold vs. an ounce of feathers? The answer is the gold, because precious metals are traditionally weighed in

2586: 1884:

has this to say on sites like that: "Press releases, blogs, newsletters, advocacy and self-help publications, and other sources contain a wide range of biomedical information ranging from factual to fraudulent, with a high percentage being of low quality.

2274: 1053:

No worries. Please check both of my changes for content, though. One part in particular didn't read right. I tried to keep the correct meaning, but please make sure I did. It was the part that discussed "discrepancy" tests between IQ and reading level.

1887:

Peer-reviewed medical information resources such as WebMD and UpToDate can be useful guides about the relevant medical literature and how much weight to give different sources; however, as much as possible Knowledge articles should cite the literature

848:

board. You may, of course, skip to a "final warning" if he does it again as his edits are clearly both vandalism and personal attacks (and since the only use of this account has been vandalism), but if you do that, the block request may or may not be

1182:

Yup, just saw it. The brief mention probably isn't enough to make them notable, but it is enough to reasonably remove the speedy delete tag. I may still AFD it after a while to let others decide if they are notable enough - I'll watch it for now.

432:

exercise. Also the reason I took 12 hours away from the site today. Thanks, Eldereft - I actually didn't realize this was a good - or even acceptable - thing to do. I appreciate the tip, and whether others follow suit or not, I'm glad I did it. --

3396: 2622:

Thanks! I appreciate the recognition. And I hope you continue to write about ghost towns. There are so many red links and missing entries for what I consider to be a fascinating subject. If I can ever be of assistance, just let me know. Thanks.

1017:

be seen above. I will post a copy of this to all who I think may wish to the new begining of the Dyslexia project and a copy will appear on your individual discussion pages ( I hope you do not mind). The oringinal copy of this can be found at

1762:

If possible, I would prefer that you email me directly before removing those items at cmoran@pamedsoc.org for a discussion. My concern is that you are removing legitimate information that can help thousands with various health conditions.

3996:

unincorporated community; with average income, average number of people per household, etc. Can you dig any of that up, or will we have to stick with the simple sentence "As of the 1990 census, Silver Reef housed approximately 50 people"?

1675:

Thanks for the assistance on the trademark issues. If you see anything else that is simply wrong there, please feel free to drop me a line here if you don't want to get involved with actively editing. Either way, best of luck to you.

4464:

edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I

4657: 2112:

You are always free to recreate an article that has been deleted. If, at that time, you have reliable sources that show notability, then that version of the article will likely be kept. That said, I once again urge you to read the

607:. I don't think you meant to suggest anything improper, I just think the policies concerning this are a little vague, especially when it comes to a process like RfC:User where three or more people are required to start the process. 2806:

Thanks. I saw that format in another article, and figured it would work well for the Arizona list. Thanks for adding some of the many missing details - I try to do some from time to time when I get a chance, but it's a long list!

4677: 779:) to a site selling the HealthyEd brand of Butea supplement. Adding links to an article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Please see Knowledge's policies on 971:) without so much as a mention on the talk page, it's a good bet it will be reverted. The better approach would be to add information to the article first (assuming you have reliable sources to backup your claims), and 4672: 3027:, while others are borderline at worst. To me, and to the other editors actively engaged in a dialog on the article's talk page, that means that such changes merit discussion as to whether the links are contrary to 3538:

You are absolutely correct. Thank you for pointing this out. I see it clearly now that you did so. I just don't know what to do about it yet. I will keep looking for a replacement map. They aren't easy to come by!

4537:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3972:

for a few examples. Obviously for many ghost towns the depth of information used in a demographics section for a living town just isn't available. I think you take what you can get, and write it up the best you

4341:

Good day Transity, this was my first attempt to create a wikimedia page, which was an interesting experience. Editor AlexF was curt as expected but kindly directed me to appropriate reference pages to learn

3299: 3230:

Thanks for your help on the Willie & Lobo page. I've made additional edits and wanted to get your input. Am I going in the right direction? I would not want this page to be deleted, if at all possible.

679:

Bad news. I've been able to restore everyone's points - except yours. You see, my scripts make a list of the most linked-to disambigs at the beginning of each month. Originally, one of the disambigs was

3805:

I can see why you might ask, but the several dermatology-related articles I've edited have been things I've stumbled upon either due to vandalism, or other more general medical edits. Good luck, though.

2937:

I have long since stopped being an active editor on Knowledge as my disability creates a communication barrier. All of my online PubMed research paper collections on a wide range of topics are listed on

479:

covers when and how it can be ok to muck about with the display record. Collapsing off-topic discussions can lead to trouble, but I tried to be as conservative as possible while still having some effect.

3830:

Thank you Transity, your endorsement, from a Reviewer no less, are appreciated! I'm enjoying my foray into WikipediaEditLand and getting positive feedback is great.--S. Rich 02:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

4662: 2550:

there — you simply used whatever argument propped up the end result you were aiming for. You came here with a clear agenda, and without ever understanding the policies of Knowledge, you attempted to

712:

No worries. The fixes are still made - I just don't have a tally for those changes. Not a big deal at all. In a dynamic environment, things like this are bound to happen. Glad to hear you've got the

4477:, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! 3472: 4474: 3106:. In addition, I didn't tell you that you had to prove that you weren't pushing a POV, I simply asked that you discuss these obviously contentious changes on the talk page. Finally, as I was the 1832:

In your last message you wrote "In addition, there are guidelines for what sources are reliable sources for medical articles. You should review these to see if and when your site passes muster."

554:

Thanks, Eldereft. And don't worry - the snarkiness was appropriate given what you'd just waded through. Hopefully we'll get a few extra eyes on the IC debate, get it settled, and move forward. --

418:

completely with what you've collapsed. Indeed a lot more could be collapsed. If I have the time to do so, I will try to strike out some of my more off-topic statements that still remain. --

2637:

Dont mention it. I cant belive that you have never gotten this award. You deserved it ages ago. And Ill try to work on Ghost Town articles some more. I usualy spread my time between This,

522:

Also, sorry for the high level of snarkiness in my opening comment; I had just finished reading that talkpage. Hopefully we all can be a little calmer and more rational from here on in. -

3040:, so please refrain from tossing around baseless accusations. There's no reason why a civil discussion cannot take place on these links, and the best way to ensure that is to remember to 1022:

dyslexia article as it is now. And we can tinker with it without changing the actual article itself and discuss and issue we may have before making further changes to the article itself.

3460:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 3384:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 3287:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1759:

I promise you that we are not selling anything, but rather help out with areas related to health care by providing peer-reviewed information written in a format for the average patient.

1445:

I wrote about the wrong person. I meant the CEO of the other Griffon Corp. Both are defense contractors but French is the CEO of the small Griffon, not the large one. Very confusing!

248:

I've added the links below as handy reference for disputes that often arise concerning how to recognize pseudoscience, and how to address pseudoscientific claims in Knowledge articles.

4453: 3471:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

3395:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

3298:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2523:

were running afoul of, and my arguments for why your edits had to be changed. I stand by every edit I made, and I'd point out that you never once even tried to counter my arguments.

809:), but there's no reason to promote or even mention this particular brand of Butea supplement that I can see. Read the policies that I've linked to here and I think you'll agree. -- 688:(perfectly good move on his part, BTW) and that confused my scripts to the point they no longer could figure out who fixed what. I can't think of a way to bring those points back. 603:

comment above to that effect is appropriate. I don't think it's appropriate, though, to try to find other users who might join in on an RfC, as that might constitute a violation of

1100:

In addition, I imagine that will have now switched off the 'You have a message' banner so the real offender will not get warned (if he/she cares). Any ideas on how to fix this?

1126:

from several weeks back. You already have a login, and you will likely have a new IP soon enough, so I wouldn't worry about it. The problem will take care of itself. Cheers! --

844:

does it again, I would suggest that you use a third level warning for vandalism, then a fourth, and if he vandalizes again (after his final warning), have him blocked at the

378: 1953:

I did not receive an email, so please either resend, or feel free to reply here or on the article's talk page with your concerns. As of right now, the article is tagged as

1097:

However, either there is a glitch in the Knowledge system or someone has been able to take over my IP address. Can you suggest anyone who might be able to help with this?

3381: 3363: 2559:

And for the record, I have done a lot of research into the paranormal, so you are incorrect when you say that this is a topic I "obviously know nothing about." Goodbye. --

1497:

page about our attempt to provide a worldwide view in these articles. We could use as many people providing feedback as possible. Please read and respond, if you can.

1143:

Thanks for the reply. I hadn't realised that IP addresses were habitually reassigned by ISPs. A pity, since it means that the original vandal won't be rebuked. Cheers!

643:. You don't have to solve a problem like Ratel; just succinctly document your efforts and move on. It's okay to leave a mess for another editor else to deal with. Really. 498: 4684: 2604:

from a stub into a real article and for giving me encouragment in making Ghost Town related articles, I herby award you the Ghost towns Barnstar. congratulations! --

337:

I insist you can not delete the statements with references, eventhough they are against what we think". I know that alternative treatments maynot be scientific, but

2721:

And these lines record the coordinates, then tell the page where to display them ("inline" = in the infobox in this case, and "title" = up top in the right corner).

400:

remaining comments, that would be nice. Either striking the text or replacing it with a brief note to that effect might improve the mood of that page. Thank you. -

915:

of dyslexia. I could be wrong but there has been no evidens over thr last few weeks to prove otherwise, just some personal vendetta for reasons best known to them

4778: 3717:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1361:. These things aren't usually spelled out; it's just understood. Fact is, I didn't even know about the tons myself until I was reading the documentation for the 2784:, but I see that someone is more on-the-ball than I. Your table format makes the list much more useable, and should be the standard for lists of ghost towns. 4233:

Frenchie is my character from my show that is her name i am just trying to make a Wiki for my show that is all i am linking them to my Wiki Character page ok!

2835:

Thanks for the catch. The quote was so long I thought it was just someone else blogging on here, as often happens. We should make the quote stand out better.

2250:. In addition, I have watched the page since then, and every added link has followed suit. I think this change will circumvent a lot of DAB links. Thanks. -- 2218:

Sorry - I thought I just had to tag for deletion, then complete the move myself. I have re-tagged, in the proper format, with an explanation. In a nutshell,

4785:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

1222:

Thanks! The extra eyes are appreciated. I plan to work on more ghost towns in Arizona (probably Harshaw and Mowry next), and if I find more information on

626:

So again, please do let me know if you move forward with an RfC, and I will do the same for you (as part of a larger notice to all interested parties). --

3923:

Not a thing. I can't even find confirmation that Silver Reef is counted as part of Leeds (or that it isn't). Not sure where else to look at this point.

4456:, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $ 20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day ( 3885:' population, since they're only about half a mile away from each other. Then again there were 1990 Census numbers....I'll do some poking around, too. 3102:

up to other editors to individually argue against each of the multiple deletions you made, and trying to claim that it is would seem an awful lot like

1704:

Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for the "global trademark" text, and also look at a rewrite of some parts of the article, per what you mentioned above. --

4767: 2009:

This article has been edited to address the issues you raised. Please advise if there are any others that should be addressed. Thank you. Srl40214

4273: 2372:

that you're not sure about, by all means drop me a line. And if there's anything you'd like me to take a look at, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. --

4590:

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most

3960:

In my opinion: sure. I try to cover historical population data as well as anything more recent in a demographics section for a ghost town. See

2957: 1600: 140: 73: 4583:

is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group

2044:

I suggest that you read the following pages so that you can understand why the article doesn't meet the requirements as it is. Start with the

2035:

been adequately addressed. You added a bunch of non-reliable sources to the article, which doesn't address the need to improve the references

202:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 3118:

and without discussion, and that your reverts came very close to edit warring. So do be careful about accusing others of violating policies.

2540:. That includes those who, like you, believe that mediums and psychics are real. Think about that, and what it means, before tossing around 2415:

to respond. I plan to invite, one by one, all admins involved in its deletion to reply. Thank you for your warning. I really appreciate it.

4611: 4599: 4562: 4065: 4005: 3950: 3913: 3894: 3851: 2899: 2060:

to understand why your sources don't qualify as reliable, and what sources you would need to provide in order to address the issues raised.

746: 1094:. Having a clear conscience I am unperturbed by your message, which was extremely polite considering the rubbish that had been inserted. 4727: 3523: 2478: 2314:

articles, and I truly appreciate the hat tip. My goal (ridiculous though it may be) is to bring most of the AZ ghost towns from stub to

1494: 1314: 1018: 933: 656:

Thanks for your input, Flowanda. I think I'll give it a go, and try to get back to editing content and actually enjoying myself here. --

2996:

As a note, you didn't say which removals were due to which supposed problems, and some of the removed links were, in my view, clearly

2638: 2663:

Oh and one more thing, how do you make the little maps that show the location of the ghost town and how do you add the corrdinates?--

384:

Any time the two of you feel like concentrating on the issue at hand instead of each other would be fine by me. I just collapsed the

4698: 4413: 2097: 2016: 1867: 1782: 801:

article. Please don't continue to do that as it violates Knowledge policies, as I described above. Please feel free to add links to

788: 1672:

Subjectively, I sure do need some help, so I'm hoping the BLP notice will at least attract some extra eyes. So far, nothing though.

791:

for the same reasons. I don't think you are intentionally spamming, but your actions are contrary to the policies above. Thank you.

4317:. Please take the time to read those policies, and I think you will see why your articles keep being tagged for deletion. Thanks. 3790:. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. --- 3250: 895:

Thank you very much for reverting the rogue edits to my talkpage, it is people like you who keep Knowledge running. Thank you. --

2181:

Hello Transity, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of

1626:

No worries about the template. As the person who added the CSD that is now replaced by this PROD, I appreciate the head's up. --

4607: 4558: 4167:

I just made a plea for help to the first admin I spotted online and the article has finally been protected. Thank you again! -

3435: 3359: 3262: 2519: 1604: 1212: 188:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

3977:

those residents are counted today, and that's still something that can be researched, but for now, I'd go with what you have.

1038:

Thanks for wordsmith edits. I get these word recall, or word block problems due to my APD , can be very frustrating at times

4473:

page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the

2781: 2347:

Thanks for helping improve "my" articles on Utah ghost towns. I owe you; I'll try to get around to helping out with Arizona.

2318:

start class, and to create a few more articles to fill in existing red links. So far it's the most fun I've had on Knowledge.

2311: 1998: 1941: 1167:

I've contested the speedy deletion on behalf of the article creator as I've found a NY Times source - see article talk page.

528: 406: 182: 125: 52: 1076:

Tonight (9 July 2009), I hit my usual link to my watchlist and was told that a) I was not logged on and b) I had a message.

828:

Thanks for reverting that obnoxious vandalism on my talk page. How do I bring in an administrator to deal with the vandal?

988:

page, and suggested this approach. As I said there, if you've got reliable sources to backup what you're saying, then this

787:

for further guidance. In addition to removing these links, I also declined your request for creation of the article titled

286: 1490:

I noticed that you've made changes to the dyslexia article in the not-too-distant past and wanted to solicit your input.

4647: 4305:

You need to read the policies I (and others) linked to on your user page. The articles you are creating have no claim to

1844:"In general, Knowledge's medical articles should be based upon published, reliable secondary sources whenever possible." 4295: 4269: 2915: 2642: 1982:

Thank you for your prompt reply. I will email you tomorrow addressing the issues you raised about this page. Srl40214

4763: 4549:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4203:

No problem. I know what you mean about the nap, think I'll go now before I stumble upon another situation like that. -

4786: 4554: 3733: 2071:

If you have something more to add to the article, please do so. Otherwise, I will have to submit for deletion via the

1592: 1536: 1331: 1307: 1300: 1279: 475:

that they might be interested in that discussion; hopefully now it will be easier for new editors to get up to speed.

199: 3453: 3377: 3280: 2141: 1596: 1411: 332: 146: 81: 3198:, and I explained why my edit did no such thing. Full stop. I'll consider this discussion on my talk page closed. 4771: 3737: 3703: 3663:

better though I doubt anyone would balk at leaving the old language unreferenced as it's pretty uncontroversial.

2874: 2840: 2766: 2745:

My coordinates usually come from the USGS GNIS site (you can follow a ref link then query for a new location). --

2668: 2654: 2609: 2207: 945: 3071:, the onus is on you to justify the inclusion of such links. If you felt some of the links were not contrary to 4579:

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the

4062: 4002: 3947: 3910: 3891: 3848: 1573: 868:{{IPvandal|1.1.1.1}} – IP used solely for repeated vandalism, including <span class="db-cGxhaW5saW5rcw": --> 762: 750: 4690:

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

1967:

Either way, I will certainly not tag for speedy delete as it was not your intent to blank the page. Thanks. --

940:

are inappropriate. And I'm getting pretty tired of these personal attacks on my ability to understand topics.

4731: 4291: 4265: 3527: 1795:

some, and others could continue to do so. I urge you to review the guidelines I linked to on your talk page (

4704:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. 4580: 3710: 833: 153: 96: 4392:

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

4625: 4412:

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see

4053: 3718: 2902:

that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work,

2219: 2182: 2175: 1661:

Thanks for the note. I was a little concerned when I saw your comment, and I was wondering if you thought

1532: 1321: 1269: 592: 346: 321: 4438: 4417: 4211: 4175: 4138: 4049: 2101: 2020: 1918: 1863: 1778: 1406: 900: 4687:

that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

3702:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

3496:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3420:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3323:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2503:

Your petty obsession with enforcing your views on something you obviously know nothing about. Goodbye.

3194:"Assume good faith" does not mean the same thing as "ignore the obvious." You accused me of violating 1903:

in violation of Knowledge policies. I urge you to think about that before adding these links again. --

1859: 1774: 1161: 27: 4470: 4261: 4108: 4104: 3748: 3519: 3501: 3461: 3425: 3385: 3328: 3288: 3246: 3238: 2870: 2836: 2761: 2664: 2650: 2605: 2601: 2202: 2093: 2012: 1986: 1929: 1855: 1770: 1722: 1695: 1651: 941: 776: 742: 3743:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

2991:

page. It seems that you are doing that now, so I'm sure the discussion will proceed from this point.

1390: 101: 4796: 4550: 4057: 3997: 3942: 3905: 3886: 3843: 3714: 3699: 2508: 1800: 1608: 1584: 1561: 1450: 1223: 1208: 1148: 1122: 1111: 4347: 3171: 3080: 2980: 2759:

Thanks now Ill be able to add those to my ghost town pages! Oh and PS do you like my signature?--

2489: 2471: 2464: 2444: 2434: 2420: 2397: 1994: 1937: 1717:

It's totally up to you now, that's merely what my next comment on the talk page would have been!

1507: 876:

don't let it bother you - these guys are a dime-a-dozen, and their vandalism never lasts long. --

829: 784: 648: 523: 401: 2971:. Please provide your justification for putting dead links and other external links which break 691:

If it's any consolation, I've had the theme to the Rockford Files stuck in my head all day :) --

4395:

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

4709: 4526: 4517: 4388:

in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

3965: 3839: 3787: 2947: 2934: 2551: 2297: 2163: 2148: 1796: 1616: 1569: 1327: 1275: 1227: 1172: 1043: 1029: 985: 937: 922: 588: 342: 317: 4546: 4530: 4487: 4434: 4204: 4168: 4131: 3969: 3961: 3795: 3652: 3621: 3562: 3482:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

3406:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

3309:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

3284: 3266: 3224: 3067:

By reverting my edit, you added links to the article which had clearly been challenged. Per

2789: 2352: 2289: 2247: 2235: 2231: 2190: 1380: 1372: 1365: 1090:

I have no idea what my IP number is (nor how to find out) but it was not I that vandalised

896: 855: 640: 604: 257: 4545:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2242:

a few days back, and received no responses. In short, I fixed several hundred DAB links to

2201:

before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. —

4239: 3744: 3497: 3421: 3324: 3242: 1881: 1812: 1718: 1691: 1647: 806: 4668:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages 4645:

message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the

4791: 4758: 4742: 4542: 4534: 4127: 3783: 3725: 3103: 3072: 3028: 3001: 2529: 2504: 2114: 2053: 1954: 1808: 1446: 1204: 1144: 1107: 862:

and use the following template, adding the IP address and links to the vandalism diffs:

780: 702: 476: 472: 393: 252: 57: 3452:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

3376:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

3279:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

3132:

on the actual topic of this discussion, namely the article in question and its links.

2238:

should have {{Otheruses|Motte (disambiguation)}} added up top. I posted about this on

281: 4538: 4384: 4343: 4323: 4314: 4191: 4155: 4123: 4082: 4034: 3983: 3929: 3869: 3812: 3764: 3729: 3669: 3647:

of the area (supported by the topo map), but hey that's original research :) Cheers,

3596: 3578: 3545: 3493: 3486:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

3483: 3476: 3465: 3417: 3410:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

3407: 3400: 3389: 3345: 3320: 3313:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

3310: 3303: 3292: 3204: 3167: 3138: 3076: 3055: 3041: 2976: 2857: 2813: 2747: 2625: 2561: 2541: 2485: 2449: 2430: 2416: 2393: 2374: 2330: 2252: 2198: 2123: 2118: 2077: 2072: 2049: 2045: 1990: 1969: 1961: 1933: 1905: 1817: 1804: 1733: 1706: 1678: 1628: 1550: 1503: 1467: 1428: 1232: 1185: 1128: 1056: 994: 878: 859: 845: 811: 798: 772: 718: 658: 644: 628: 583: 556: 460: 434: 420: 389: 363: 295: 111: 22: 3941:

Hm....could we still add a demographics section using only the 1990 census details?

3642:

gives me a mental image of tectonic or volcanic uplift. Anyway, I didn't remove the

1524: 716:

playing in your head - sorry to confess that's why I picked that example! Cheers. --

4310: 4237:

Have you made any effort at all to read the policies and guidelines linked to you?

4041: 3856: 3457: 3439: 3195: 3068: 3045: 3037: 3024: 3020: 3005: 2972: 2968: 2943: 2939: 2293: 2159: 2144: 2057: 1612: 1398: 1168: 1039: 1025: 960: 918: 802: 502: 42: 3687: 3397:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Summer Enrichment Program (University of Virginia)

2585: 2140:

I think we found the outside sources that you were looking for. . . Take a look.

736:

serious condition (Impotence)and greater awareness can only be beneficial to all.

339:

as you know, some of the medicines that we use today, come from the common "herbs"

3758:

Thank you. I will review the guidelines, and check the list for pending reviews.

1871: 1786: 1549:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

621:, and not just one directed at those who hold opinions similar to your or my own. 4478: 4306: 3882: 3791: 3782:

Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the

3648: 3617: 3558: 3162:

Sure, I welcome discussion on the articles talk page. Hopefully you remember to

2904: 2785: 2412: 2408: 2348: 2273: 1851:

Chuck Moran Director, Institute for Good Medicine Pennsylvania Medical Society

1402: 1376: 1091: 312: 133: 3881:

Alright, thanks! I'm not sure if Silver Reef's population would be included in

3732:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 3445: 3369: 3272: 2891: 2678:

It's part of the Infobox functionality. These lines add the map, and format it:

1766:

Chuck Moran Director Institute for Good Medicine Pennsylvania Medical Society

86: 4056:) are labeled as such, so I think it would be a good idea. What do you think? 2239: 2056:

for some general guidance on writing articles on companies. Finally, read the

1895:

I still think you need to review the links I provided more carefully. You are

1579:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1350: 1253: 713: 66: 4653:

that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

3713:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

1268:

For making a decent, referenced, non-stubbed article about Harshaw, Arizona.

1358: 692: 3008:

in all cases, until and unless you can make an argument for removing them.

4457: 4401: 2646: 968: 767:

Welcome to Knowledge! I see that you've added links on several articles (

4365: 2048:

so that you understand what confers notability in general. Then look at

1815:. You should review these to see if and when your site passes muster. -- 936:. Dolfrog can't/won't accept the strong consensus that his additions of 272:

Policy: Burden of Proof and what to do with unsourced pseudo information

4502: 3004:. As such, the burden does not fall to me to "prove" that they satisfy 4800: 4735: 4715: 4615: 4566: 4492: 4442: 4351: 4330: 4299: 4277: 4245: 4216: 4198: 4180: 4162: 4143: 4112: 4089: 4070: 4010: 3990: 3955: 3936: 3918: 3899: 3876: 3819: 3799: 3771: 3752: 3676: 3656: 3625: 3603: 3585: 3566: 3552: 3531: 3505: 3429: 3352: 3332: 3254: 3211: 3175: 3145: 3084: 3062: 2984: 2951: 2920: 2878: 2864: 2844: 2820: 2793: 2772: 2753: 2672: 2658: 2631: 2613: 2567: 2512: 2493: 2455: 2438: 2424: 2401: 2380: 2356: 2336: 2301: 2258: 2212: 2167: 2152: 2129: 2105: 2083: 2024: 2002: 1975: 1945: 1911: 1823: 1739: 1726: 1712: 1699: 1684: 1655: 1634: 1620: 1511: 1473: 1454: 1434: 1415: 1384: 1338: 1286: 1238: 1216: 1191: 1176: 1152: 1134: 1115: 1062: 1047: 1033: 1000: 949: 926: 904: 884: 837: 817: 754: 724: 706: 664: 651: 634: 596: 562: 533: 466: 440: 426: 411: 371: 350: 325: 301: 253:

Policy: What should be classified as pseudoscience and what should not

213: 4185:

Sorry you were stuck there alone for so long. I think I need a nap!

276: 271: 4076:

well, and that there's some overlap between the two. I'm not sure.

3557:

Changed description to topo map. It would be nice to have a scale.

2733:|longd = 114 |longm = 37 |longs = 23 |longEW = W 2578:

I dont know if you already have this but you certainly deserve it.

1960:

Note that if you remove the prod tag, I will likely nominate as an

805:

documenting the effects of Butea in general (see the guidelines on

359: 4624: 3300:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mysto & Pizzi (2nd nomination)

3023:, but as I said, some of your removals seem to be clearly okay by 2933:

I have added link to my Otitis Media Research paper collection on

2243: 2227: 2223: 1899:

editing with a conflict of interest, and your excessive links are

768: 388:

off-topic comments, but if you happened to feel like removing the

266: 4621:

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

4533:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

3724:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

3031:

before simply removing them. Those are my rationales for my edit.

2708:|map_caption = Location in the state of ] <- 2066:

it is likely that the article does not meet notability standards.

1103:

Having now logged on for another month, I am able to wish you…..

2780:

I was going to give you one of these barnstars for your work on

685: 267:

Policy: How to properly weight minority views vs. majority views

4407:

Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

2730:|latd = 35 |latm = 02 |lats = 24 |latNS = N 1357:

article, what you refer to as "regular tons" (in the U.S.) are

3163: 1544:

Page now asserts notability, but proof is needed of notability

1493:

I just started a new conversation on the Wikiproject dyslexia

1354: 233: 166: 4694:

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded

4149:

No worries. Can't wait for that protection to come through!!

3634:

bit kinda bothers me a little - seems an odd replacement for

3473:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Stan Romanek (2nd nomination)

4501: 4364: 3686: 3444: 3368: 3271: 2890: 2481:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2463: 2246:

a few months back, and every one of them meant to direct to

1523: 1317:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1299: 3904:

I don't mean to be pushy, but have you found anything yet?

3736:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 2052:

so that you see what makes a company notable. Also try the

1964:

unless you also address the concerns that have been raised.

4130:, but it appears all the admins are otherwise occupied. - 3019:

also have no desire to include links that are contrary to

471:

Thank you, that is much better. I just left a note at the

2310:

Thanks! I've been having a lot of fun working on various

1375:; I hope to see more of your ghost towns contributions. 4756:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4685:

more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general

4598:

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at

2964: 2538:

no one sided with you on any of the articles you edited

1665:

was trampling on BLP somehow. So I appreciate the note.

1483:

New conversation about issue with the dyslexia articles

681: 454: 4766:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to 4606:

and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying.

3838:

I noticed you provided a census table for the article

2288:

For your work with ghost towns, especially converting

1556:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

783:

and particularly the policies on that page concerning

277:

Policy: Exceptional claims require exceptional sources

4658:

Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled

3709:

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

1230:, I'll expand them further as well. Thanks, again. -- 4212: 4176: 4139: 1835:

At the link you provided was written the following:

959:

seemingly off-topic category to an article (as with

4452:I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the 2554:. That tends to get people upset, as you have seen. 2544:

just because your edits didn't hold up to scrutiny.

1829:Transity ... thanks again for your clarifications. 379:

Talk:Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome

331:I noticed that you discussed it in another article 4458:see the project page for details on scoring points 3382:Summer Enrichment Program (University of Virginia) 3364:Summer Enrichment Program (University of Virginia) 2762: 4525:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2292:from a mess of trivia to a fine-quality article. 499:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science 4048:unincorporated community? A couple ghost towns ( 2767: 2701:|pushpin_mapsize = 250 <- 2694:|pushpin_label_position = right <- 2687:|pushpin_map = Arizona <- 4595:dynamic, supportive environment for your work. 4433:What section in the article is being disputed? 3114:, I would suggest that you were making changes 2429:Okay, i edit a little. Please comment. Thanks. 1603:can result in deletion without discussion, and 4779:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hyder, Arizona 287:Essay: Dealing with Dedicated Fringe Advocates 244:Knowledge Guidelines on NPOV and Pseudoscience 4321: 4189: 4153: 4080: 4032: 3981: 3927: 3867: 3810: 3762: 3667: 3594: 3576: 3543: 3343: 3202: 3136: 3053: 2855: 2811: 2366:helping out with the articles I've worked on. 1079:I clicked the 'message' banner first and saw 8: 4678:Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list 4454:November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest 2552:make your point, whether it was valid or not 1731:Understood. That's all I was looking for. -- 4205: 4169: 4132: 3036:Finally, in no way was my edit contrary to 2470:Hello, Transity. You have new messages at 2050:the guidelines for notability for companies 1306:Hello, Transity. You have new messages at 975:look to add the category if it makes sense. 4448:Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest 3694:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 1841:And, also at that link was the following: 858:. To report a vandal to be blocked, go to 2583: 2271: 1520:Proposed deletion of Maryjo Adams Cochran 703: 4673:Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android 4663:Editor-focused central editing dashboard 2736:|coordinates_display = inline,title 2600:Because of your huge efforts in turning 2193:|PAGE TO BE MOVED HERE|REASON FOR MOVE}} 1611:for deletion. Sorry about the template! 684:. On May 8, R&B moved that page to 262:to give equal validity to opposing views 3638:, but I guess it's in the ref as such. 3492:This is an automatic notification by a 3416:This is an automatic notification by a 3319:This is an automatic notification by a 2187:Please tell us what to move here using 1568:notice, but please explain why in your 1326:If you reply here, please leave me a {{ 1274:If you reply here, please leave me a {{ 934:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dyslexia#RFC 797:I see you added the links again to the 211:. The original talk page is located at 4067:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 4007:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 3952:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 3915:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 3896:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 3853:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 3110:editor to revert your changes for the 2958:Chiropractic controversy and criticism 2926:Otitis Media Research Paper Collection 1251: 910:otitis media with effusion to dyslexia 505:in some fairly specific circumstances. 2343:Thanks for help with Utah ghost towns 1813:reliable sources for medical articles 1009:The dyslexia project: A new beginning 307:Alternative treatment for common cold 234:Click here to leave a message for me. 7: 4635:Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers! 4581:current system we introduced in 2011 358:This comment has been pasted to the 4768:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2528:I see that you are "retiring," per 2518:Thanks, but I'll let the record of 2226:should be moved to that page. Then 1019:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dyslexia 4777:The discussion will take place at 4098:Xenos Chrsitian Fellowship article 2942:I hope this is useful best wishes 2903: 2696:where to label to point on the map 2639:Knowledge:WikiProject Micronations 2119:guidelines on conflict of interest 1551:deleted for any of several reasons 1539:because of the following concern: 854:Warning templates can be found at 362:where the discussion continues. -- 14: 4551:review the candidates' statements 4512:周信行 22:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 4313:, and as the creator, you have a 4252:List of MyOwnEmailShow characters 3706:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 3234:Thanks again for your help. Tom 2362:No worries. Besides, you already 2039:the need to establish notability. 2031:Actually, the issues raised have 1646:you get some more eyes from BLP. 341:. Sicnece is not perfect. Thanks 4749: 4469:credit links fixed by turning a 4360: 4337:Speedy Deletion of Cal lane page 3786:, particularly with the ongoing 2594:WikiProject Ghost towns Barnstar 2584: 2328:for the help you've given me. -- 2272: 1252: 932:See discussion and consensus at 100: 85: 72: 65: 56: 41: 26: 3636:comparatively little soil cover 2185:- a page you tagged - because: 697: 694: 311:Dear user, Your recent edit in 4649:2016 Community Wishlist Survey 4557:. For the Election committee, 4527:Arbitration Committee election 4518:ArbCom elections are now open! 4328: 4196: 4160: 4087: 4039: 3988: 3934: 3874: 3817: 3769: 3674: 3601: 3583: 3550: 3350: 3209: 3143: 3060: 2879:16:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 2865:16:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 2862: 2845:15:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 2818: 2782:List of ghost towns in Arizona 2773:20:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 2754:19:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2673:18:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2659:18:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2632:18:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2614:17:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2494:13:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 4736:10:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC) 4616:04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 4567:13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 4493:02:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 4318: 4186: 4150: 4077: 4058: 4029: 3998: 3978: 3943: 3924: 3906: 3887: 3864: 3844: 3807: 3759: 3698:" userright, allowing you to 3664: 3591: 3573: 3540: 3353:15:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 3340: 3333:01:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 3255:04:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 3212:19:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3199: 3176:19:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3146:18:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3133: 3085:18:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3063:03:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3050: 2985:22:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC) 2852: 2821:16:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 2808: 2794:19:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 2568:22:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 2513:22:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 2046:general notability guidelines 1308:I dream of horses's talk page 1069:"You have vandalised" message 984:I just replied to you on the 639:Arcayne has some good advice 16: 4801:01:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC) 4716:01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC) 4572:New deal for page patrollers 4443:20:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 4420:13:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 4257:some popularity on YouTube 4122:Thanks for helping out with 2952:16:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC) 2921:18:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 2643:Knowledge:WikiProject Alaska 2230:should become a redirect to 2199:criteria for speedy deletion 2058:policies on reliable sources 1353:. And as you can see at the 967:to have anything to do with 577:Possible RfC Regarding Ratel 4553:and submit your choices on 3734:Knowledge:Reviewing process 3456:. The nominated article is 3380:. The nominated article is 3283:. The nominated article is 2969:guideline on external links 2831:Big Trouble in Little China 2456:12:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2439:12:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2425:04:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2402:03:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2381:18:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 2357:18:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 2337:02:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 2302:22:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 2259:01:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 2213:21:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 2168:20:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 2153:14:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 1607:allows discussion to reach 992:be added to the article. -- 473:Fringe theories noticeboard 282:Essay: Scientific Consensus 4816: 4608:MediaWiki message delivery 4559:MediaWiki message delivery 4352:15:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 4331:02:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 4300:02:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 4290:some popularity on YouTube 4278:02:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 4246:02:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 3833: 3715:a small number of articles 3506:01:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 2174:Speedy deletion declined: 2142:Xenos Christian Fellowship 2130:17:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2106:17:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2084:14:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2025:13:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2003:01:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1976:01:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1946:01:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1912:18:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1872:18:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1824:17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1787:17:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1740:17:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1727:17:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1713:17:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1700:15:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1685:15:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1656:13:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 1635:18:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 1621:18:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 1512:21:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 665:19:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 652:02:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 635:20:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 597:04:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 563:03:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 534:20:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 497:debate is also covered by 467:01:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 441:01:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 427:22:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 412:15:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 4764:significantly contributed 4217:00:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 4199:00:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 4181:00:49, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 4163:00:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 4144:00:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 4113:14:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC) 4090:01:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC) 4071:19:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 4042:18:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 4011:14:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 3991:14:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 3956:13:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 3937:00:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 3919:22:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 3900:14:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 3877:14:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 3857:14:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC) 3820:00:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 3800:21:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC) 3772:02:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 3753:17:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 3700:review other users' edits 3677:15:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 3657:15:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 3626:02:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC) 3604:02:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC) 3586:01:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC) 3567:01:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC) 3553:00:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 3532:19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 3479:with four tildes (~~~~). 3430:01:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 3403:with four tildes (~~~~). 3306:with four tildes (~~~~). 2967:was against Wikiepedia's 2590: 2536:your beliefs on mediums, 2278: 1593:Proposed Deletion process 1474:22:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 1455:22:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 1435:14:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 1416:21:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1385:00:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 1339:19:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 1287:19:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 1258: 1239:14:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 1217:04:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 1192:14:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 1177:14:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 1153:09:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 1135:02:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 1082:User talk:91.110.236.64 1063:15:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 1048:15:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 1034:21:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 1001:14:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 950:14:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 927:14:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 824:Vandalism on my talk page 714:Rockford Files theme song 501:, which allows appeal to 453:Unfortunately, Ratel has 372:21:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 351:16:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 326:16:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 302:20:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 4699:User wikipedia/RC Patrol 3834:Silver Reef's population 3719:Special:OldReviewedPages 1753: 1116:21:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 905:19:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 885:18:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 838:17:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 818:20:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 755:16:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 725:21:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 707:21:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 477:WP:TALK#Editing comments 367: 152: 145: 138: 131: 124: 117: 110: 4418:Global message delivery 2222:should be deleted, and 1601:Speedy Deletion process 1574:the article's talk page 503:Arbitration enforcement 154: 147: 126: 119: 112: 4787:the configuration page 4629: 4506: 4369: 4357:New Page Patrol survey 3784:Dermatology task force 3691: 3683:You are now a Reviewer 3449: 3373: 3276: 2895: 2703:width of the map image 2468: 2220:Motte (disambiguation) 2183:Motte (disambiguation) 2176:Motte (disambiguation) 1528: 1371:template. Good job on 1304: 1262:The Geography Barnstar 739:Thanks Steve douglas 619:all interested parties 4628: 4531:Arbitration Committee 4505: 4368: 4285:President Of Resident 3690: 3484:articles for deletion 3466:What Knowledge is not 3448: 3408:articles for deletion 3390:What Knowledge is not 3372: 3311:articles for deletion 3293:What Knowledge is not 3275: 2894: 2710:caption under the map 2467: 2282:The Original Barnstar 2073:Articles for Deletion 1955:proposed for deletion 1605:Articles for Deletion 1537:proposed for deletion 1527: 1401:that demonstrate any 1303: 682:LAPD (disambiguation) 360:common cold talk page 221:ki/User_talk:Transity 4762:, to which you have 4722:Hey, I remember you! 4383:Hello Transity! The 4315:conflict of interest 3475:. Please be sure to 3462:Knowledge:Notability 3399:. Please be sure to 3386:Knowledge:Notability 3302:. Please be sure to 3289:Knowledge:Notability 2602:Mohave City, Arizona 2472:ESCapade's talk page 1962:article for deletion 1533:Maryjo Adams Cochran 1397:able to provide any 807:good medical sources 777:Erectile dysfunction 4770:or if it should be 4683:Further, there are 4535:arbitration process 3826:redundant wikilinks 2871:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) 2837:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) 2649:related articles.-- 2574:Ghost Town Barnstar 2075:process. Thanks. -- 1198:Ghost town articles 891:Mucho Gratias Amigo 455:erased your comment 4726:Long time no see! 4630: 4602:New Page Reviewers 4587:has been created. 4547:arbitration policy 4507: 4374:New page patrol – 4370: 4292:MyOwnEmailShowWiki 4266:MyOwnEmailShowWiki 3692: 3477:sign your comments 3450: 3401:sign your comments 3374: 3304:sign your comments 3277: 2975:on the talk page. 2896: 2479:remove this notice 2469: 2312:Arizona ghost town 2197:Please review the 1919:Stay Thirsty Press 1597:deletion processes 1529: 1315:remove this notice 1305: 856:WP:VANDAL#Warnings 731:RE HealthyED pills 237: 198:you are viewing a 4718: 4705: 4585:New Page Reviewer 4426: 4425: 4421: 4376:Survey Invitation 4281: 4264:comment added by 3966:Fairbank, Arizona 3640:Jutting mountains 3632:jutting mountains 3522:comment added by 3285:Mysto & Pizzi 3267:Mysto & Pizzi 3258: 3241:comment added by 3225:Willie & Lobo 3164:assume good faith 3116:against consensus 3104:gaming the system 3042:assume good faith 2935:Talk:Otitis media 2919: 2619: 2618: 2307: 2306: 2115:FAQ on businesses 2096:comment added by 2054:FAQ on businesses 2015:comment added by 2006: 1989:comment added by 1949: 1932:comment added by 1875: 1858:comment added by 1790: 1773:comment added by 1414: 1335: 1322:I dream of horses 1292: 1291: 1283: 1270:I dream of horses 1121:(leaving this on 986:Talk:Otitis media 938:Category:Dyslexia 745:comment added by 532: 410: 394:unproductive text 231: 229: 228: 161: 160: 4807: 4753: 4752: 4713: 4703: 4697: 4693: 4650: 4485: 4411: 4361: 4329: 4327: 4320: 4311:reliable sources 4280: 4258: 4242: 4229:Frenchie Dawimp 4214: 4209: 4197: 4195: 4188: 4178: 4173: 4161: 4159: 4152: 4141: 4136: 4088: 4086: 4079: 4060: 4040: 4038: 4031: 4000: 3989: 3987: 3980: 3970:Swansea, Arizona 3962:Harshaw, Arizona 3945: 3935: 3933: 3926: 3908: 3889: 3875: 3873: 3866: 3846: 3818: 3816: 3809: 3770: 3768: 3761: 3697: 3675: 3673: 3666: 3602: 3600: 3593: 3584: 3582: 3575: 3551: 3549: 3542: 3534: 3351: 3349: 3342: 3257: 3235: 3210: 3208: 3201: 3144: 3142: 3135: 3061: 3059: 3052: 2912: 2908: 2863: 2861: 2854: 2819: 2817: 2810: 2769: 2764: 2750: 2689:which map to use 2628: 2588: 2581: 2580: 2564: 2542:personal attacks 2482: 2452: 2407:I'm waiting for 2377: 2333: 2290:Swansea, Arizona 2276: 2269: 2268: 2265:Another barnstar 2255: 2248:motte-and-bailey 2236:motte-and-bailey 2232:motte-and-bailey 2210: 2205: 2194: 2126: 2108: 2080: 2027: 2005: 1983: 1972: 1948: 1926: 1908: 1874: 1852: 1820: 1789: 1767: 1736: 1709: 1681: 1631: 1590: 1589: 1583: 1567: 1566: 1560: 1470: 1431: 1421:Actually, thank 1410: 1407:Accounting4Taste 1399:reliable sources 1373:Harshaw, Arizona 1370: 1364: 1336: 1325: 1318: 1284: 1273: 1256: 1249: 1248: 1235: 1188: 1162:Tereza Elizarova 1131: 1059: 997: 963:, which doesn't 881: 869:, </span: --> 814: 803:reliable sources 757: 721: 704: 699: 696: 661: 631: 617:notification to 559: 526: 463: 437: 423: 404: 390:personal attacks 298: 225: 222: 219: 216: 210: 209: 206: 197: 195: 192: 181: 180: 177: 167: 156: 149: 143: 136: 128: 121: 114: 104: 89: 76: 69: 60: 45: 30: 17: 4815: 4814: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4789:. Delivered by 4754: 4750: 4747: 4724: 4701: 4695: 4648: 4638: 4623: 4574: 4555:the voting page 4521: 4500: 4479: 4450: 4431: 4379: 4359: 4339: 4287: 4259: 4254: 4240: 4231: 4120: 4100: 4068: 4008: 3953: 3916: 3897: 3854: 3836: 3828: 3780: 3704:two-month trial 3695: 3685: 3517: 3513: 3443: 3367: 3270: 3236: 3228: 2961: 2928: 2918: 2906: 2889: 2833: 2771: 2748: 2665:Coldplay Expert 2651:Coldplay Expert 2626: 2606:Coldplay Expert 2576: 2562: 2501: 2483: 2476: 2450: 2389: 2375: 2345: 2331: 2267: 2253: 2208: 2203: 2188: 2179: 2138: 2124: 2091: 2078: 2010: 1984: 1970: 1927: 1922: 1906: 1853: 1818: 1768: 1756: 1734: 1707: 1679: 1643: 1629: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1564: 1558: 1557: 1522: 1485: 1468: 1443: 1429: 1394: 1368: 1362: 1346: 1344:Ounces and tons 1324: 1319: 1312: 1297: 1272: 1247: 1233: 1200: 1186: 1165: 1129: 1071: 1057: 1011: 995: 942:Gordonofcartoon 912: 893: 879: 870: 826: 812: 740: 733: 719: 677: 659: 629: 579: 557: 461: 435: 421: 382: 309: 296: 246: 238: 220: 217: 215:https://en.wiki 214: 212: 207: 204: 203: 193: 190: 189: 178: 175: 174: 139: 134:Edit Statistics 132: 106: 105: 98: 91: 90: 83: 62: 61: 54: 47: 46: 39: 32: 31: 24: 12: 11: 5: 4813: 4811: 4759:Hyder, Arizona 4748: 4746: 4743:Hyder, Arizona 4741:Nomination of 4739: 4723: 4720: 4708:Best regards, 4681: 4680: 4675: 4670: 4665: 4660: 4632: 4622: 4619: 4573: 4570: 4524: 4520: 4515: 4513: 4499: 4496: 4475:Daily Disambig 4449: 4446: 4430: 4429:Allison DuBois 4427: 4424: 4423: 4409: 4406: 4397: 4396: 4393: 4381: 4372: 4358: 4355: 4338: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4286: 4283: 4253: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4230: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4119: 4116: 4099: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4066: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4006: 3974: 3951: 3914: 3895: 3852: 3835: 3832: 3827: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3779: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3730:BLP violations 3684: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3644:... soil cover 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3512: 3509: 3442: 3438:nomination of 3433: 3366: 3362:nomination of 3357: 3356: 3355: 3269: 3265:nomination of 3260: 3227: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3033: 3032: 3010: 3009: 2993: 2992: 2960: 2955: 2927: 2924: 2914: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2734: 2731: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2706: 2705: 2699: 2698: 2692: 2691: 2680: 2679: 2635: 2634: 2617: 2616: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2589: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2556: 2555: 2546: 2545: 2530:your user page 2525: 2524: 2500: 2497: 2475: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2445:your talk page 2443:Will reply on 2427: 2388: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2368: 2367: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2320: 2319: 2305: 2304: 2285: 2284: 2279: 2277: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2178: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2087: 2086: 2068: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2041: 2040: 1981: 1979: 1978: 1965: 1958: 1921: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1892: 1891: 1827: 1826: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1673: 1670: 1666: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1591:will stop the 1547: 1546: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1477: 1476: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1393: 1391:MS Productions 1388: 1345: 1342: 1330:}} message on 1311: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1278:}} message on 1265: 1264: 1259: 1257: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1138: 1137: 1123:your talk page 1106:All the best, 1089: 1073:Dear Transity 1070: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 979: 978: 977: 976: 953: 952: 911: 908: 892: 889: 888: 887: 872: 871: 867: 864: 863: 851: 850: 825: 822: 821: 820: 794: 793: 763:your talk page 747:84.201.157.246 732: 729: 728: 727: 676: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 623: 622: 609: 608: 578: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 446: 445: 444: 443: 381: 376: 355: 354: 308: 305: 292: 290: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 255: 245: 242: 240: 230: 227: 226: 187: 183:user talk page 170: 164: 162: 159: 158: 151: 144: 137: 130: 123: 116: 108: 107: 99: 95: 94: 92: 84: 80: 79: 77: 70: 63: 55: 51: 50: 48: 40: 36: 35: 33: 25: 21: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4812: 4803: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4793: 4788: 4783: 4782:the article. 4780: 4775: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4760: 4744: 4740: 4738: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4728:92.17.185.193 4721: 4719: 4717: 4711: 4706: 4700: 4691: 4688: 4686: 4679: 4676: 4674: 4671: 4669: 4666: 4664: 4661: 4659: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4652: 4651: 4644: 4643:one-time-only 4639: 4637: 4636: 4627: 4620: 4618: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4596: 4593: 4588: 4586: 4582: 4577: 4576:Hi Transity, 4571: 4569: 4568: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4519: 4516: 4514: 4510: 4504: 4497: 4495: 4494: 4491: 4490: 4486: 4484: 4483: 4476: 4472: 4471:WP:DABCONCEPT 4468: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4447: 4445: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4428: 4422: 4419: 4415: 4408: 4405: 4404:to take part. 4403: 4400:Please click 4394: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4386: 4380: 4378: 4377: 4367: 4363: 4362: 4356: 4354: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4336: 4332: 4326: 4325: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4284: 4282: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4251: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4228: 4218: 4215: 4210: 4208: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4194: 4193: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4179: 4174: 4172: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4158: 4157: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4142: 4137: 4135: 4129: 4125: 4124:One Direction 4117: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4097: 4091: 4085: 4084: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4069: 4063: 4061: 4055: 4051: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4037: 4036: 4012: 4009: 4003: 4001: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3986: 3985: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3954: 3948: 3946: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3932: 3931: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3917: 3911: 3909: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3898: 3892: 3890: 3884: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3872: 3871: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3855: 3849: 3847: 3841: 3831: 3825: 3821: 3815: 3814: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3788:Bolognia push 3785: 3777: 3773: 3767: 3766: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3741: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3722: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3711:autoconfirmed 3707: 3705: 3701: 3689: 3682: 3678: 3672: 3671: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3628: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3605: 3599: 3598: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3581: 3580: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3548: 3547: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3524:97.115.212.69 3521: 3510: 3508: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3485: 3480: 3478: 3474: 3469: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3447: 3441: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3409: 3404: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3371: 3365: 3361: 3358: 3354: 3348: 3347: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3312: 3307: 3305: 3301: 3296: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3274: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3259: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3232: 3226: 3223: 3213: 3207: 3206: 3197: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3147: 3141: 3140: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3058: 3057: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3017: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2956: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2931: 2925: 2923: 2922: 2917: 2911: 2910: 2901: 2893: 2886: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2860: 2859: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2830: 2822: 2816: 2815: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2744: 2743: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2711: 2707: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2621: 2620: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2579: 2573: 2569: 2566: 2565: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2548: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2498: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2480: 2473: 2466: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2386: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2327: 2322: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2264: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2206: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2184: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2143: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2120: 2116: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1966: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1910: 1909: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1883: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1764: 1760: 1754:It's not spam 1741: 1738: 1737: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1586: 1577: 1575: 1571: 1563: 1554: 1552: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1534: 1526: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1491: 1488: 1482: 1480: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1463: 1460:Well, I know 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1440: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1367: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1343: 1341: 1340: 1333: 1329: 1323: 1316: 1309: 1302: 1294: 1288: 1281: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1163: 1160: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1087: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1014: 1008: 1002: 999: 998: 991: 987: 983: 982: 981: 980: 974: 970: 966: 962: 957: 956: 955: 954: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 930: 929: 928: 924: 920: 916: 909: 907: 906: 902: 898: 890: 886: 883: 882: 874: 873: 866: 865: 861: 857: 853: 852: 847: 842: 841: 840: 839: 835: 831: 830:MarcusMaximus 823: 819: 816: 815: 808: 804: 800: 799:Butea superba 796: 795: 792: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 773:Butea superba 770: 764: 761:As I said on 760: 759: 758: 756: 752: 748: 744: 737: 730: 726: 723: 722: 715: 711: 710: 709: 708: 705: 701: 700: 689: 687: 683: 675:DAB challenge 674: 666: 663: 662: 655: 654: 653: 650: 646: 642: 638: 637: 636: 633: 632: 625: 624: 620: 616: 611: 610: 606: 601: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 585: 576: 564: 561: 560: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 535: 530: 525: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 504: 500: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 478: 474: 470: 469: 468: 465: 464: 456: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 442: 439: 438: 430: 429: 428: 425: 424: 416: 415: 414: 413: 408: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 380: 377: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 361: 353: 352: 348: 344: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 314: 306: 304: 303: 300: 299: 288: 285: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 261: 258:Policy: When 256: 254: 251: 250: 249: 243: 241: 236: 235: 223: 201: 186: 184: 171: 169: 168: 165: 157: 155:User Subpages 150: 142: 135: 129: 122: 115: 109: 103: 97: 93: 88: 82: 78: 75: 71: 68: 64: 59: 53: 49: 44: 38: 34: 29: 23: 19: 18: 4790: 4784: 4776: 4757: 4755: 4745:for deletion 4725: 4710:Stevietheman 4707: 4692: 4689: 4682: 4646: 4642: 4640: 4634: 4633: 4631: 4601: 4600: 4597: 4591: 4589: 4584: 4578: 4575: 4522: 4511: 4508: 4488: 4481: 4480: 4466: 4461: 4451: 4432: 4410: 4399: 4398: 4382: 4375: 4373: 4371: 4340: 4322: 4288: 4260:— Preceding 4255: 4238: 4232: 4206: 4190: 4170: 4154: 4133: 4121: 4101: 4081: 4033: 4027: 3982: 3928: 3868: 3837: 3829: 3811: 3781: 3763: 3742: 3723: 3708: 3693: 3668: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3629: 3614: 3595: 3577: 3544: 3514: 3490:Please note: 3489: 3488: 3481: 3470: 3458:Stan Romanek 3451: 3440:Stan Romanek 3414:Please note: 3413: 3412: 3405: 3394: 3375: 3344: 3317:Please note: 3316: 3315: 3308: 3297: 3278: 3233: 3229: 3203: 3137: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3099: 3098:that, it is 3054: 3015: 3000:contrary to 2997: 2963:Your recent 2962: 2940:User:Dolfrog 2932: 2930:Hi Transity 2929: 2897: 2887:WikiBirthday 2856: 2834: 2812: 2758: 2746: 2709: 2702: 2695: 2688: 2662: 2636: 2624: 2593: 2577: 2560: 2537: 2533: 2502: 2484: 2448: 2390: 2373: 2363: 2346: 2329: 2325: 2315: 2281: 2251: 2186: 2180: 2139: 2122: 2088: 2076: 2036: 2032: 2008: 1980: 1968: 1923: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1886: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1816: 1801:WP:SPAMLINKS 1765: 1761: 1757: 1732: 1705: 1677: 1662: 1644: 1627: 1599:exist. The 1595:, but other 1578: 1570:edit summary 1555: 1548: 1543: 1531:The article 1530: 1515: 1502: 1499: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1478: 1466: 1461: 1444: 1441:Larry French 1427: 1422: 1395: 1347: 1332:my talk page 1320: 1280:my talk page 1261: 1231: 1201: 1184: 1166: 1127: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1055: 1037: 1024: 1015: 1012: 993: 989: 972: 964: 961:Otitis media 917: 913: 894: 877: 827: 810: 766: 738: 734: 717: 693: 690: 678: 657: 627: 618: 614: 589:Scramblecase 580: 555: 459: 433: 419: 397: 385: 383: 357: 356: 343:Parvazbato59 340: 336: 318:Parvazbato59 310: 294: 291: 259: 247: 239: 232: 218:pedia.org/wi 172: 163: 118: 37: 4714:Delivered: 4435:Nightscream 3840:Silver Reef 3778:Dermatology 3518:—Preceding 3511:Harshaw Map 3237:—Preceding 3112:same reason 2898:I saw from 2499:Get over it 2098:76.16.100.8 2092:—Preceding 2017:76.16.100.8 2011:—Preceding 1985:—Preceding 1928:—Preceding 1860:Chuckmoran7 1854:—Preceding 1775:Chuckmoran7 1769:—Preceding 1487:Hi, there. 1351:troy ounces 1092:Common cold 897:T.M.M. Dowd 741:—Preceding 313:common cold 200:mirror site 4641:This is a 4543:topic bans 4414:NPP Survey 4307:notability 4241:Falcon8765 4105:Kgilbert78 4059:The Raptor 3999:The Raptor 3944:The Raptor 3907:The Raptor 3888:The Raptor 3845:The Raptor 3745:Courcelles 3498:Erwin85Bot 3422:Erwin85Bot 3325:Erwin85Bot 3243:Patchallel 2520:your edits 2240:Talk:Motte 2209:Wartenberg 1925:Srl40214 1797:WP:SPAMMER 1719:GDallimore 1692:GDallimore 1648:GDallimore 1585:dated prod 1562:dated prod 1403:notability 1359:short tons 1224:Charleston 392:and other 386:completely 173:This is a 4792:SDZeroBot 4539:site bans 4509:一隻小貓送給您！ 4207:JuneGloom 4171:JuneGloom 4134:JuneGloom 4118:Thank you 4054:example 2 4050:example 1 3726:vandalism 2851:article. 2505:Spritebox 2364:have been 1888:directly. 1609:consensus 1535:has been 1447:User F203 1205:Narthring 1145:Dinoceras 1108:Dinoceras 789:healthyed 785:link spam 605:WP:CANVAS 4498:一隻小貓送給您！ 4344:Mgpeters 4324:Transity 4274:contribs 4262:unsigned 4192:Transity 4156:Transity 4083:Transity 4035:Transity 3984:Transity 3930:Transity 3870:Transity 3813:Transity 3765:Transity 3696:reviewer 3670:Transity 3597:Transity 3579:Transity 3546:Transity 3520:unsigned 3454:deletion 3378:deletion 3346:Transity 3281:deletion 3251:contribs 3239:unsigned 3205:Transity 3168:DigitalC 3139:Transity 3077:DigitalC 3056:Transity 2977:DigitalC 2916:contribs 2869:Thanks! 2858:Transity 2814:Transity 2763:Coldplay 2749:Transity 2647:Coldplay 2627:Transity 2563:Transity 2486:ESCapade 2477:You can 2451:Transity 2431:ESCapade 2417:ESCapade 2394:ESCapade 2387:Zenfolio 2376:Transity 2332:Transity 2316:at least 2254:Transity 2125:Transity 2117:and the 2094:unsigned 2079:Transity 2013:unsigned 1999:contribs 1991:Srl40214 1987:unsigned 1971:Transity 1942:contribs 1934:Srl40214 1930:unsigned 1907:Transity 1882:WP:MEDRS 1868:contribs 1856:unsigned 1819:Transity 1783:contribs 1771:unsigned 1735:Transity 1708:Transity 1680:Transity 1630:Transity 1504:Rosmoran 1500:Thanks! 1469:Transity 1430:Transity 1328:Talkback 1313:You can 1295:Talkback 1276:Talkback 1245:Barnstar 1234:Transity 1228:Fairbank 1213:contribs 1187:Transity 1130:Transity 1058:Transity 1013:Hi All 996:Transity 969:dyslexia 880:Transity 849:honored. 813:Transity 743:unsigned 720:Transity 660:Transity 645:Flowanda 630:Transity 558:Transity 524:Eldereft 462:Transity 436:Transity 422:Transity 402:Eldereft 364:Transity 297:Transity 127:Contribs 4772:deleted 4592:current 4128:WP:RfPP 3073:WP:ELNO 3029:WP:ELNO 3002:WP:ELNO 2944:dolfrog 2294:Nyttend 2191:db-move 2160:Oldag07 2158:Thanks 2145:Oldag07 1901:clearly 1897:clearly 1809:WP:BFAQ 1613:Bearian 1366:convert 1169:Exxolon 1040:dolfrog 1026:dolfrog 919:dolfrog 615:general 141:Gallery 4529:. The 4482:bd2412 3968:, and 3792:kilbad 3649:Vsmith 3618:Vsmith 3590:Done. 3559:Vsmith 3108:second 3016:always 2965:revert 2786:Plazak 2768:Expert 2413:Porqin 2409:Kmccoy 2349:Ntsimp 2234:, and 1805:WP:COI 1572:or on 1377:Ntsimp 990:should 860:WP:AIV 846:WP:AIV 775:, and 584:WP:SPA 4342:more. 4309:, no 3883:Leeds 3630:That 3464:and " 3388:and " 3291:and " 3196:WP:EL 3069:WP:EL 3046:WP:EL 3038:WP:EL 3025:WP:EL 3021:WP:EL 3006:WP:EL 2973:WP:EL 2534:share 2244:Motte 2228:Motte 2224:Motte 2136:Xenos 1203:work! 769:Butea 529:cont. 407:cont. 396:from 208:pedia 194:pedia 179:pedia 148:eMail 4797:talk 4732:talk 4612:talk 4563:talk 4467:will 4462:nine 4439:talk 4402:HERE 4348:talk 4296:talk 4270:talk 4213:Talk 4177:Talk 4140:Talk 4109:talk 4052:and 3973:can. 3796:talk 3749:talk 3738:here 3653:talk 3622:talk 3563:talk 3528:talk 3502:talk 3468:"). 3426:talk 3392:"). 3329:talk 3295:"). 3247:talk 3172:talk 3081:talk 2981:talk 2948:talk 2909:anaɢ 2900:here 2875:talk 2841:talk 2790:talk 2669:talk 2655:talk 2645:and 2610:talk 2509:talk 2490:talk 2447:. -- 2435:talk 2421:talk 2411:and 2398:talk 2353:talk 2298:talk 2204:Jake 2164:talk 2149:talk 2102:talk 2021:talk 1995:talk 1938:talk 1864:talk 1779:talk 1723:Talk 1696:Talk 1652:Talk 1641:Edge 1617:talk 1508:talk 1495:talk 1451:talk 1412:talk 1381:talk 1226:and 1209:talk 1173:talk 1149:talk 1112:talk 1044:talk 1030:talk 973:then 965:seem 946:talk 923:talk 901:talk 834:talk 781:spam 751:talk 686:LAPD 649:Talk 641:here 593:talk 398:your 368:talk 347:talk 333:here 322:talk 205:Wiki 191:Wiki 176:Wiki 120:Talk 113:Home 4523:Hi, 4385:WMF 3728:or 3494:bot 3436:AfD 3418:bot 3360:AfD 3321:bot 3263:AfD 3100:not 2998:not 2326:you 2033:not 1462:I'm 1423:you 1355:ton 1337:@ 1285:@ 260:not 4799:) 4774:. 4734:) 4712:— 4702:}} 4696:{{ 4614:) 4565:) 4541:, 4441:) 4416:. 4350:) 4319:-- 4298:) 4276:) 4272:• 4187:-- 4151:-- 4111:) 4078:-- 4030:-- 3979:-- 3964:, 3925:-- 3865:-- 3808:-- 3798:) 3760:-- 3751:) 3740:. 3721:. 3665:-- 3655:) 3624:) 3592:-- 3574:-- 3565:) 3541:-- 3530:) 3504:) 3428:) 3341:-- 3331:) 3253:) 3249:• 3200:-- 3174:) 3134:-- 3083:) 3051:-- 2983:) 2950:) 2877:) 2853:-- 2843:) 2809:-- 2792:) 2671:) 2657:) 2641:, 2623:-- 2612:) 2511:) 2492:) 2437:) 2423:) 2400:) 2355:) 2300:) 2189:{{ 2166:) 2151:) 2104:) 2037:or 2023:) 2001:) 1997:• 1944:) 1940:• 1870:) 1866:• 1807:, 1803:, 1799:, 1785:) 1781:• 1725:) 1698:) 1676:-- 1654:) 1619:) 1588:}} 1582:{{ 1576:. 1565:}} 1559:{{ 1553:. 1510:) 1465:-- 1453:) 1383:) 1369:}} 1363:{{ 1215:) 1211:• 1183:-- 1175:) 1151:) 1114:) 1054:-- 1046:) 1032:) 948:) 925:) 903:) 836:) 771:, 765:: 753:) 698:Ga 695:Ja 647:| 595:) 370:) 349:) 324:) 293:-- 4795:( 4730:( 4610:( 4561:( 4489:T 4437:( 4346:( 4294:( 4268:( 4107:( 4064:/ 4004:/ 3949:/ 3912:/ 3893:/ 3850:/ 3794:( 3747:( 3651:( 3620:( 3561:( 3526:( 3500:( 3424:( 3327:( 3245:( 3170:( 3079:( 2979:( 2946:( 2913:/ 2907:ʨ 2905:r 2873:( 2839:( 2788:( 2667:( 2653:( 2608:( 2507:( 2488:( 2474:. 2433:( 2419:( 2396:( 2351:( 2296:( 2195:. 2162:( 2147:( 2100:( 2019:( 1993:( 1936:( 1890:" 1862:( 1777:( 1721:( 1694:( 1663:I 1650:( 1615:( 1506:( 1449:( 1409:: 1379:( 1334:. 1310:. 1282:. 1207:( 1171:( 1147:( 1110:( 1042:( 1028:( 944:( 921:( 899:( 832:( 749:( 591:( 531:) 527:( 409:) 405:( 366:( 345:( 320:( 224:. 196:, 185:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index