86:
only one working on this. Unfortunately, it is generally the case that student groups are not considered to be notable and that their articles should be merged into the school article. Working on this means that I will hurt people's feelings sometimes, particularly because the articles about comedy groups are often created by the members or their friends or their webmasters, and so it's a very personal work for them, and I know many see
Knowledge (XXG) as a way to get attention for their group as part of their PR. But Knowledge (XXG) is not for PR or for personal web pages. Finally, everything needs to ve
204:
Finally, although your policy of erasing huge swaths of text is inside the letter of the law but not within the spirit of the law. Moreover, it is completely unproductive. If you would simply tag claims that are unconfirmed, as is the policy, so that people can come along and confirm or disprove them. If there is nothing, then most editors will not be able to offer their information, as there is nothing there to improve upon. Reducing articles to nothing, benefits no one, even if it makes the article more "trustworthy." Genesis is messy, let it happen well.
208:
is another article I helped develop, and it was messy, but the editors corrected and confirmed information slowly and patiently, and the result is a very solid piece. So cool it, please, and maybe we can work together. I need a few more days to put stuff together, so I'm tagging it as undergoing a
85:
I only mark for speedy deletion for notability. If the subject is truly notable, then it shouldn't take long to find references. I have been trying to improve a number of articles whose subjects are notable, and ironically, some of which were marked for deletion by others. This tells me I'm not the
203:
TIC, please be so kind as to not slash out all of the content on the page for the Jester of
Columbia. Firstly, information concerning the content of the magazine is eminently observable and consequently not necessarily cited. Secondly, I am getting citations for the article, and I have added the
180:. You need not be an admin to do it. While I'm well within my rights to remove the improper tag yet again, I've added the hangon tag. I strongly suggest doing the right thing and simply AfDing the article if you insist on deletion. --
47:
You mark stuff for speedy deletion, which gives nobody time to fix the issue (as if every author was on
Knowledge (XXG) every day, scouring what he's already written) before the content is unceremoniously and silently dumped.
40:
Look, I know you're just trying to make a better
Knowledge (XXG) here, but you are fairly destructive about it. You don't read or reply to discussion (nobody knows why) before you make sweeping edits.
161:- plays, books, and similar publications do not fall under the criteria. If you still feel that a play written by one of the most popular authors for children should be deleted, try AfD. Thanks. --
110:
113:
so I removed the speedy tag. If it sounds too much like an ad, remove/edit those parts, or if you think the article is too far gone nominate for AfD again.
44:
which is near heretical in my opinion. If you're going to be the Sword of
Damocles and smite peoples' work, at least talk about it first!
219:
The entire article is unreferenced and has been tagged as such for months. If this information is unverifiable, it should be deleted. --
20:
90:. If removing uncited claims leaves the article short or even a stub, that's fine because everything in the article can be trusted. --
177:
185:
166:
65:
Apparently, according to your talk archives, a horde of people agree with me. Could you at least try to work
30:
181:
162:
238:. I don't know if you mind or not (some do, some don't), so I figured I'd leave you a message. Cheers,
220:
124:
91:
103:
205:
240:
196:
114:
52:
137:
143:
You think this group is notable enought for WIKI entry or should we nominate for deletion?--
158:
210:
87:
144:
76:
246:
223:
213:
189:
170:
147:
127:
117:
94:
79:
62:
Please slow down before you wield that sword. Please. What is the big hurry?
59:
have been fixed. Your actions were NOT helpful in this case.
235:
55:? It's gone, I can't see any history on it. It
8:
23:: February 13, 2007 – February 19, 2007
7:
14:
234:By the way, just as a side-note,
236:your archives are being edited
178:anyone can remove a speedy tag
42:You ignore the discussion page
1:
159:the criteria for non-notables
111:survived AfD in November 2006
262:
224:16:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
214:19:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
190:16:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
171:20:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
148:14:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
128:02:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
118:01:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
95:07:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
80:22:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
247:01:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
221:Future Fun Jumper (TIC)
125:Future Fun Jumper (TIC)
92:Future Fun Jumper (TIC)
230:Edits to your archives
31:Farce Side Comedy Hour
206:Philolexian Society
176:Also, so you know,
197:Jester of Columbia
209:major revision.
188:
169:
123:Great. Thanks. --
51:What happened to
253:
243:
184:
165:
157:Hi. Please see
261:
260:
256:
255:
254:
252:
251:
250:
241:
232:
201:
155:
141:
107:
35:
24:
12:
11:
5:
259:
257:
231:
228:
227:
226:
200:
194:
193:
192:
182:badlydrawnjeff
163:badlydrawnjeff
154:
151:
140:
135:
133:
131:
130:
106:
104:Elephant Larry
101:
100:
99:
97:
69:us instead of
34:
28:
26:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
258:
249:
248:
245:
244:
242:Daniel Bryant
237:
229:
225:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
207:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
168:
164:
160:
152:
150:
149:
146:
139:
136:
134:
129:
126:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
112:
109:This article
105:
102:
98:
96:
93:
89:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
74:
72:
68:
63:
60:
58:
54:
49:
45:
43:
38:
32:
29:
27:
22:
17:
239:
233:
202:
156:
153:CSD on Holes
142:
132:
108:
75:
70:
66:
64:
61:
56:
50:
46:
41:
39:
36:
25:
15:
53:Barren Mind
138:Britethorn
88:verifiable
21:/archive 1
16:Archives:
211:Stakhanov
77:Cernansky
145:Twintone
199:erasure
71:against
115:Salahx
57:could
37:Hey,
33:Edits
186:talk
167:talk
73:us?
67:with
19:*
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.