243:
language/compiler/runtime should work. And it can be practical used, because everything you need is there (libraries etc.). At the same I think Nim is still in it's early phase, the version number is not yet 1.0 and big changes are still possible. I can't say whether the other articles should be deleted, but I'm sure that Nim is already notable or will be notable in the future. --
51:
You made a list of languages that apparently should be deleted according to
Knowledge (XXG) rules, so most of those languages are now in process of deletion: "There are Knowledge (XXG) articles about hundreds of programming languages. Many of them don't have any secondary sources. So why do you think
21:
Hello. Why did you nominate so many programming languages articles for deletion? Did you not read the discussion or the relevant polices before posting? Do you agree with my "programming language nursery" idea to keep at least some of those info from deletion? Or you will try to save at least some of
193:
You nominated a whole bunch of programmming languages at the same time based on his list. I can't do a serious search for sources on so many languages at once, and I don't want to see them all deleted, so I came here to ask for help, as he was interested in Nim deletion, maybe he don't want some of
264:
I didn't saw that he edited the Nim article (or if I saw I forgot). And of course you can nominate those pages for deletion (actually I thought only admins could do it), but I think that nominating too many similar things at once spread the resources to search for references too thin, and increase
237:
You have to know, that I know much about the German
Knowledge (XXG) but almost nothing about the English Knowledge (XXG), especially I don't know much about notability and deletion policy here. I thought only the German Knowledge (XXG) is very strict about notability and in the English Knowledge
242:
I'm a software developer since more than 10 years and I know many programming languages. (Not only knowing them by it's name, but know how to work with them.) I was always looking for a better language, until I found Nim. Nim is the first language, which works the way I think a
163:
did nothing. I'm the one who nominated them, as anyone should for any article that does not meet notability guidelines. The only reason these articles have not been nominated before is because no experienced editors had come across them, which is why
215:
Of course he was interested in the nim deletion. He wrote the Nim article. I am welcome to nominate programming languages for deletion, as is anyone. They don't meet notability guidelines, they don't belong here.
168:
is a notability fallacy. If the article can stand up to scrutiny, it will remain. If not, it never deserved to be on
Knowledge (XXG) in the first place. Stop acting like someone is being hurt over this.
310:
306:
81:
303:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
233:
Funny discussion, I like you guys :D. "He wrote the Nim article." Wow, too much honor for me. I've just added some sentences.
69:
165:
109:
296:
295:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
85:
77:
57:
89:
65:
61:
53:
101:
97:
73:
266:
210:
195:
155:
140:
23:
270:
199:
144:
27:
224:
177:
113:
121:
326:
125:
117:
129:
93:
244:
160:
38:
317:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
259:
218:
194:
those languages articles lost. And I do think
Knowledge (XXG) is being hurt by this.
188:
171:
322:
318:
105:
133:
37:
I have never nominated anything for deletion in this
Knowledge (XXG). --
330:
274:
252:
228:
203:
181:
148:
46:
31:
238:(XXG) everything gets an article, but apparently that's not true.
300:
299:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
265:
the risk of notable articles being deleted unfairly.
52:
Nim is not notable, but the following languages are?
8:
291:Disambiguation link notification for April 5
136:(I have just picked some random articles)"
22:that info in Rosetta Code or whathever?
139:I hope you are aware of what you did.
7:
82:Join-calculus (programming language)
14:
1:
86:Objeck (programming language)
70:Halide (programming language)
78:Plaid (programming language)
58:Picky (programming language)
110:Hope (programming language)
90:Nemo (programming language)
66:Seph (programming language)
62:Little Interpreted Language
54:Obol (programming language)
346:
297:Nim (programming language)
102:Slave Programming Language
98:Cl4 (programming language)
74:Roy (programming language)
331:09:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
275:23:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
253:21:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
229:20:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
204:20:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
182:19:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
149:14:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
47:08:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
32:00:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
248:
42:
17:Programming languages
319:opt-out instructions
166:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
309:• Join us at the
314:
337:
304:
263:
227:
221:
214:
192:
180:
174:
159:
345:
344:
340:
339:
338:
336:
335:
334:
311:DPL WikiProject
293:
257:
219:
217:
208:
186:
172:
170:
153:
19:
12:
11:
5:
343:
341:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
255:
240:
239:
235:
234:
137:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
342:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
302:
298:
290:
276:
272:
268:
261:
256:
254:
250:
246:
241:
236:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
212:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
190:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
167:
162:
157:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
16:
316:
294:
20:
114:MX Language
321:. Thanks,
122:SmilScript
106:PureScript
305:Read the
267:Caroliano
245:Trustable
211:Caroliano
196:Caroliano
161:Trustable
156:Caroliano
141:Caroliano
39:Trustable
24:Caroliano
260:Padenton
220:Padenton
189:Padenton
173:Padenton
134:Napier88
323:DPL bot
126:Wigzy
118:MCTRL
327:talk
271:talk
249:talk
200:talk
145:talk
130:Mobl
43:talk
28:talk
307:FAQ
301:Lua
94:Ooc
329:)
273:)
251:)
202:)
147:)
132:,
128:,
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
100:,
96:,
92:,
88:,
84:,
80:,
76:,
72:,
68:,
64:,
60:,
56:,
45:)
30:)
325:(
313:.
269:(
262::
258:@
247:(
225:✉
223:|
216:―
213::
209:@
198:(
191::
187:@
178:✉
176:|
169:―
158::
154:@
143:(
41:(
26:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.