User talk:Tryptofish/Archive 21

1972:

adopt a persona: Nucleophilic is the one who discusses scientific sourcing at length, Bandn is the one who makes the most obvious personal attacks, etc. But these are already checkuser-confirmed socks. Now that the SPI case has come out, new socks are appearing, and adopting personas that correspond to the situation now: someone with an Arabic-sounding name worried about "defamation" because the article of the sockmaster is being proposed for deletion, someone apologizing for being a new and inexperienced editor while contesting the PROD, someone pretending to be a lawyer (but posting in a way no lawyer would actually post) threatening to sue because page deletion would be defamation. If I provide a diff from an earlier account, it won't look

1804:(If, after 7 days, no one had objected, an administrator would have looked at it, and deleted it if the tag and tag rationale appeared to be within process.) My advice at this point would be to respond on the article talk page, pointing out the extensive sockpuppetry and conflicts of interest for any editors who might not know about it, and see where the discussion goes from there. Deleting pages is rarely a simple thing, because everyone has strong opinions one way or the other. If, after talk page discussion, you still favor deletion, you will have to start 1326:

clearly a procedural issue, but that's water under the bridge now. What I think you should do is wait for the RfA to be over, then open a content RfC, asking for fresh eyes on what the best way to go is for the template. The argument that editors who really concentrate on the content area depend upon the template working a particular way should be a persuasive one. And, of course, refrain from using any admin tools on the template or discussions as long as there is any remaining disagreement.

509: 1310:

best to proceed to resolve the TfD mess with the least amount of drama possible, short of permitting Frietjes to rewrite the darn thing to suit his personal tastes. I considered a DRV at the time, but after review with another admin was convinced that the WP:NFL talk page option was the path of least resistance, but Frietjes has apparently now reneged on his promise to produce a mock-up for review and approval by WP:NFL editors. It is a frustrating situation.

1478: 557: 735: 2372: 31: 676: 833: 1687: 1581: 2264: 2078: 1655: 1278: 233: 1200:

Hi -- I think the material you restored had been correctly deleted, even if no reason was given. Neither statement was referenced -- one was dubious and unclear, the other was clearly false. I would probably have removed them myself if I paid more attention to that article. I'm bringing it up here

470:

discusses editing, but not who funded the source material.) You will probably find that editors will respond to you skeptically if you frame your arguments in terms of the pharmaceutical industry trying to influence what Knowledge (XXG) says, but you will get a good response if instead you frame your

281:

that I didn't know, that would explain why they were doing something that was so obviously wrong. In the process I learned things about our pharmaceutical, "health" insurance, and medical industries that that should not be. I started donating regularly to Knowledge (XXG), because some Knowledge (XXG)

191:

Thanks for letting me know (I had stopped following it). Yes, I think it's enough of a step in the right direction that I could change my !vote to support. Given the history of reverting, I'm going to wait a few days, and if your edit turns out to be stable, I'll go back and revise my comments there.

1971:

This is difficult for me, because I sincerely think that, if I'm deciding for myself, all the evidence that is needed is there, but I also think that I can read into your comment that you disagree with me, and you are going to insist on master diffs. The confirmed socks, in the archive, tend to each

1889:

suspected sock. I know it's tempting to just say "look at the case archive" or "look at the contributions", but it takes me a lot longer as a new party to the situation to get a proper idea of what's going on than it will take you to simply provide a few links. In addition to it being helpful for us

1076:

Hi Risker. That sounds fine. I kind of figured your slow answer was, in itself, an indication that there are still a lot of other things going on. I'm in no hurry. When you and the other Arbs feel ready, please either leave me a note here, or just start a discussion of your own on the Arb talk page,

2293:

Could you help me collect and analyse these student edits. I think we need to do something similar to the earlier exercise where we judge each student's edits to build up a picture of whether this is helping Knowledge (XXG). It is quite clear, from an early sample, that is most certainly is not and

1803:

By the time I logged in and took a look at it, Looie (who I'm pretty sure is watching here on my talk too), had contested the PROD, and that puts an end to it. As far as I could tell, you tagged it perfectly OK, but the way this works, anyone can revert you, and the page can never be PROD-ed again.

981:

policy page. If that makes sense to you, I'd be happy to work on a draft if you would start it. It's not a big enough priority for me to start it myself, and I'm also a little policy-ed out after that footnote discussion, so I want to start putting some more of my limited time into article space. --

980:

Good, I'm glad! I guess the way I see it, is that a behavioral guideline or essay with more nuances would be a good thing if it's in addition to keeping CHALLENGE at WP:V (sort of like a spin-off and summary style), but I would oppose doing it if it meant deleting the CHALLENGE material at the main

446:

There is much information in these three articles (and many more on antidepressants) that cannot be verified; therefore, anyone researching antidepressants on Knowledge (XXG) will not learn very much that a pharmaceutical company does not want them to know, creating a good chance that they will end

2307:

I saw your note at the noticeboard about this page, and I had already put it on my watchlist even before I got your note here. Thanks for getting it started, because it's important. If you haven't asked Looie, please be sure to, because he has a very good handle on the neuroscience pages. Given my

1445:

I sincerely hope what I said did not come across as implying that you added it arbitrarily. I don't think that at all! Rather, what I thought I was saying was that, in my opinion, it really is a specialized and uncommon situation (although it is clear that you disagree with me about that) and that

1351:

Tryptofish, please accept my thanks for your initial expressions of support, as well as your subsequent constructive criticism, during and after my RfA. I understand what you did and why you did it. I am, of course, somewhat disappointed with the conclusion of the RfA, but I must accept personal

1309:

For purposes of the RfA, I am not going to comment further on the issue. I think more than enough has been said in response to the opposes. The actual underlying situation will remain to be resolved after the RfA concludes, and I am clearly WP:INVOLVED. Following the RfA, I will need advice how

1305:

Tryptofish, thank you for reviewing the history of comments regarding the ongoing TfD merge mess. I don't want to repeat myself, but suffice it to say that the nominator did not adhere to mandatory TfD notice requirements and the closing admin chose to disregard the entire situation. If you want

379:

are designed in ways that skew the results toward success (and those trials that do show success only barely do so); the subjectively determined trial data are evaluated using statistical methods that are not suitable for subjective data; the drug's safety is inadequately evaluated; and the drug's

1976:

like a diff from these new accounts, but that would miss the point, because both would be single-purpose concerned with defending the notability of the sockmaster. Let me suggest this: please check with Delta Quad, who was the CHU on the case up to this point, not necessarily for further CHU, but

1924:

Basalisk, since you are saying this to me here, I'm going to say to you that my first impulse on seeing your clerk note was to let loose at you with a string of abusive language, to the effect of how hard is it for you to click the contributions link for the alleged sock, and see that there was a

1325:

There's definitely no need for more diffs or anything else to convince me. Please don't worry about that. You are right to step back from rebutting at the RfA, and I'm pretty sure it's going to go OK for you. I guess, with 20-20 hindsight, DRV would have been a better way to go, since there is

1306:

further diffs, etc., I am happy to provide them. The lessons I take away from this as a potential admin are the importance of adhering to written procedure policies to protect everyone concerned, and the need to recognize and undo one of your own mistaken admin actions as quickly as possible.

475:

about making corrections to any pages where you see a need for correction. You should feel free to make those edits, and then watchlist the article and its talk page. If anyone reverts your edits, or raises concerns about them on the talk page, just go to the talk page and discuss it with them

1846:

this above poster, has only 3 edits to it's name, and the other 2 are to take down the talk page, and not the main page, but instead just take out comments related to sock puppetry etc as far as I've seen so far on a cursory look. I reverted these edits as I felt it was vandalism perhaps.

334:

then states that "the effects of antidepressants are somewhat superior to those of psychotherapy", which cannot be true, since any desired effects of antidepressants are temporary (until tolerance and therefore dependence is developed), and since their effect on some people is terrible.

1788:. I am never very good at these even mildly technical wiki-things (I'm a pure content guy normally). So please look at my proposed template and modify it if I messed up. I dont really have any power to take things down, so not sure what happens after 7 days, etc etc. Thank you, -- 1102: 2152:

I want to let you know that I haven't forgotten this at all; a few days ago I made some fairly concrete suggestions to my colleagues, but they've probably got lost in all the extraneous hoopla that's going on right now. I'll try to draw the discussion back to this in a few days.

953:

Re: your note on my talk page... No need to mend fences (they were never broken). There is nothing wrong with two (or more) editors disagreeing with each other, expressing their views and trying to convince each other that "my view is right". That's how consensus building works.

1116:

For keeping the recent Verifiability/Burden thread on track, focused, and civilized while still managing to get your own position and opinions in. Frankly, everyone in that discussion deserves an award for staying on track and staying civil, but you actually get it for your

573:

was started, I had serious doubts that it would prove to be a significantly useful essay. Today, thanks in large part to your efforts it is. I'll be presenting it as a resource to several classes this semester. Thanks for helping make it a significantly useful resource.

1925:

single edit. Of course I didn't do that, and I did attempt in good faith to provide the information you wanted. Based on your comment here, do you still need me to provide diffs from the previous confirmed socks, or did I provide enough information already? --

1894:

one link for the master and one for the sock are provided. I know it's a pain but there are a lot of cases for us to work through without sifting through contribution logs, and that really is your responsibility as the filer. Thanks for your contributions.

1991:

It might be more productive to find an admin who understands the situation and ask whether you can simply bring new occurrences to that admin's attention directly. It doesn't make sense that you have to waste your time with duck situations like this.

304:. Much information on these three subjects comes from or is funded by the pharmaceutical industry, and the articles are severely deficient in several ways that tend to mislead the reader in ways beneficial to the antidepressant industry. For example: 1558:

Thanks, and... wow, just wow! I just put the mediation page on my watchlist, but this is a whole new wrinkle. I'm definitely watching now. And by the way, let me compliment you too, for remaining an outstanding Wikipedian, even after that Arb case.

1847:

Particularly because it didn't come from a recognized editor on page like yourself or Noleander and a new editor that tried to take down info that on reading the policy he cited it appeared to be his own interpretation of it, to suit his purpose.

1977:

just for evaluation of the behavioral pattern. Really, it defies common sense that these three new accounts just happened to be three unrelated people who just happened to show up at the same time with the same very idiosyncratic concern. --

1427:

example as specialised and uncommon. I beg to differ. I have come accross this situation many times in the past. Usually with the same user, but nonetheless it happened many times. So please don't downplay it as if i added it arbitrarily.

442:

given in hope (by doctor and patient) that they will hide symptoms long enough for the patient to get better before he/she stops taking the drug. The manufacturer might hope that the patient will take them long enough to become dependent.

1060:

and apologize for the delay in responding. How about if we start a discussion over the weekend? That will give my colleagues and I time to review the notes that we made in November so that we can have a more intelligent discussion.

1352:

responsibility for the ultimate outcome. It's not the end of the world, and there are still plenty of articles to edit. I hope we have occasion to work on an article or two of mutual interest in the near future. Warm regards,

1387:

Hi! I'm not entirely sure whether or not this is the proper place on your talk page to respond, but I just wanted to thank you for your warm welcome. I look forward to continuing to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) in the future.

447:

up dependent on drugs that are not necessarily safer than recreational drugs, and that may make them more depressed if they try to stop taking them (a possible side effect common to all "uppers", including antidepressants).

285:

An encyclopedia is supposed to provide accurate information that can be verified. If information comes from a source with a conflict of interest, it cannot be verified. I refer you to three Knowledge (XXG) articles:

270:

page, and seem to be familiar with working on Knowledge (XXG), so perhaps you know where to take this and how. As near as I can tell, talk pages associated with articles are very much ignored. My involvement with

2193: 313:

is not a single illness or condition, but a label given to a set of symptoms for which there is no objective diagnostic tool and no known single cause. It also states in the first paragraph that "the term

635:

Oh, thanks for setting me straight about that. Oh well, a case of too much AGF on my part. I really didn't mind writing that explanation to them, and I guess too much AGF is better than too little. --

2211:

I've had a quick start at it, and asked a question for you on the talk page. Once I understand that better, I'll be able to try to contribute more. And – congratulations on your successful RfA! --

1496: 2168:

Thanks, and no worries! I just want to make sure that the archive bot doesn't throw a wrench in the works. I do recognize that the Committee has been dealing with an awful lot of stuff lately. --

1729: 1594: 620:

been mass deleting content that's easily source-able or source-able with a reference already in the text). As such, I wouldn't worry too much about engaging with Claude while s/he works it out.

419:

have identical effects on every patient, including side effects, and that those effects be identical for all patients. Such is not the case, even when "active placebos" are used. Therefore, the

282:

articles were of great help to me in that effort; however, it occurred to me to wonder what Knowledge (XXG) had to say about some of the things I learned elsewhere, and I am very disappointed.

1159:

Agree with this - I've always thought that you would make a great mediator. And in the verifiability lead case, I think you might have done almost as much mediation as me anyway. :) —

965:

involved with challenging material (and responding to challenges) in more detail and depth. What do you think of this idea, and would you be willing to work with me on a rough draft?

612:

I get the impression that s/he's torn between coming up with sensible policy and writing something that could result in problems for his/her friend Epeefleche, who I have taken to

1885:

Hi Tryptofish. Just some friendly advice about your SPI reports; it really would be helpful if you would provide diffs when opening cases. This means diffs from both the master

466:. That's Knowledge (XXG)'s guideline for sourcing material about medical issues, so that what we report is (hopefully!) verifiable and so forth. (As for industry sponsorship, 2247: 1784:'s creations. Most of the content came from Proctor, and characteristically, it shows how clever Proctor is. I used the deletion template from your proposed deletion of 748: 690:

On a comment thread which has got very heated in the past, you made me LLOL (literally laugh out loud, as opposed to the now debased and devalued LOL) with this edit

1331:

By the way, a big part of my reasons for supporting is what I remember you writing about the Arb mailing list. I think that your analysis was impressively astute. --

1540: 528: 521: 907: 613: 2287: 1642: 592:

Kevin, thank you so much! Of course, I have to also give credit to Biosthmors. But classes making use of it is exactly what I was hoping would happen. --

897: 713:

Oh, you thought I was joking, did you? Ha! I'm collecting dry branches even as we speak. But, seriously, thank you very much for the kind wishes. --

1145:

Thank you so much! I really appreciate it! Yes, it's true – quite a bunch of cats. But I think it turned out very well in the end. Thanks again. --

893: 2189: 471:

arguments in terms of adherence to, or violation of, WP:MEDRS. Once you feel comfortable with those issues, I'd say that you should go ahead and

481: 1638: 903: 431:, and only if the failed trials and other trial manipulations are ignored. The do not show any causal relationship between that benefit and 462:

Hi, there's a lot there to respond to. I think that a good place for you to start would be by reading and making yourself familiar with

1634: 1216:

No problem! I self-reverted. I had a feeling that I might have been making a mistake, and I'm happy to accept your rationale here. --

2107: 2438: 2430: 2425: 2413: 2408: 2400: 2056: 217: 177: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 900:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 741: 734: 1956: 1908: 1748:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

277:

was not asked for, but as a result, I have learned a lot about them in a serious attempt to find out what doctors knew about

961:

if hived off into its own behavioral guideline (which we would link to at WP:V). It would allow us to discuss the various

1693: 755:

Hello :) Thank you for providing that insightful information some days ago. I have a query regarding a specific source.

2335: 1174:

You know, if I had about twice as much time to devote to Knowledge (XXG) as I actually do have... but, alas, I don't. --

130: 804:

Yes, that's what I thought. Apparently someone subsequently filled in the URL. But I'm glad we got that figured out. --

1890:

clerks, it's also necessary for the CheckUsers: the CU policy directs that they are not allowed to perform CUs unless

2379: 1749: 1735: 1714: 1705: 1585: 884:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

38: 1261: 368: 330: 309: 288: 1101: 2339: 2086: 1852: 1130: 134: 1201:

because I'd like to remove them again, but I hate anything that even vaguely resembles an edit war. Regards,

1592:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2230: 2201: 1837: 1434: 2255: 380:

product information sheet and instructions disguise risks while encouraging the development of dependence.

1686: 1507: 1194: 579: 2308:

time constraints, I'm not going to actively look, but I'll definitely add cases as I come across them. --

1848: 477: 2192:, and you seem to have a good grasp of the big picture. I would be grateful if you would have a look at 1762: 1698: 1393: 1357: 1315: 1162: 534: 221: 181: 1833: 1745: 2294:

Joordens is, well, I can't write here what he is. This class needs to stop now. But we need evidence.

1256:

you commented about additional discussions that may have taken place, you can see previous discussion

166:

Hi Trypto I made a change to the "wheel waring" section which may be a compromise you'd be okay with.

2388: 2353: 2313: 2276: 2216: 2173: 2135: 2127: 2094: 2035: 2011: 1982: 1930: 1870: 1813: 1667: 1618: 1564: 1524: 1459: 1408: 1372: 1336: 1290: 1221: 1179: 1150: 1082: 1021: 995:

Congratulations, the word "policy-ed out" has been selected (by me) as Featured wikiword of the week!

986: 938: 869: 809: 776: 718: 640: 597: 489: 371:." FDA rules essentially guarantee successful trials even if individual trial success is random. The 245: 197: 149: 47: 17: 2348:

Very understandable. Somehow, though, inviting me to do something that will give me a headache... --

1793: 1785: 1548: 1122: 998:

Please indicate if you'd like to be explicitly credited as the creator inside the fine purple box!

771:

I've replied there, although as I noted, I'm not really sure which source you were asking about. --

213: 173: 1451: 508: 472: 2226: 2197: 2116: 2065: 1997: 1959: 1911: 1603: 1429: 1367:

Thanks, that's very generous of you to say that. No matter what happened, you are a class act. --

1257: 1235: 1206: 1035: 1003: 970: 695: 653: 624: 448: 439: 273: 1477: 1447: 463: 2089:, and made a series of edits to it. It clearly fills a gap in our coverage. Congratulations! -- 1589: 1503: 923: 575: 556: 404: 400: 392: 356: 266: 570: 2331: 2158: 1777: 1758: 1739: 1389: 1353: 1311: 1253: 1066: 1057: 885: 452: 344: 324: 126: 1829: 1805: 1491:, for supporting the Society for Neuroscience Knowledge (XXG) Initiative, and for speaking 467: 160: 2349: 2309: 2299: 2272: 2212: 2169: 2131: 2090: 2031: 2007: 1978: 1926: 1866: 1809: 1663: 1614: 1560: 1520: 1455: 1404: 1368: 1332: 1286: 1217: 1175: 1146: 1078: 1017: 982: 934: 865: 805: 772: 714: 675: 636: 593: 485: 391:

attempt to demonstrate something that cannot be demonstrated in a clinical trial. Because

241: 193: 145: 2108:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Retrograde_neurotransmission

2248:

A question for people who commented in the RfC at "Probationary Period" and "Not Unless"

1633:

Hi! Would you care to share your opinion about the composite/single infobox image issue

2357: 2343: 2317: 2301: 2280: 2251: 2234: 2220: 2205: 2177: 2162: 2139: 2120: 2098: 2069: 2039: 2015: 2001: 1986: 1966: 1934: 1918: 1874: 1856: 1841: 1817: 1797: 1789: 1766: 1671: 1646: 1622: 1607: 1568: 1552: 1544: 1528: 1511: 1463: 1439: 1412: 1397: 1376: 1361: 1340: 1319: 1294: 1269: 1239: 1225: 1210: 1183: 1169: 1154: 1136: 1086: 1070: 1038: 1025: 1016:

include attribution.) I humbly accept it as a most wonderful and kind honor. Thanks! --

1006: 990: 974: 942: 927: 873: 855: 832: 813: 799: 780: 765: 722: 699: 658: 644: 629: 601: 583: 539: 493: 456: 420: 396: 384: 372: 350: 294: 278: 249: 225: 208: 201: 185: 168: 153: 138: 2053:

I just made my first article! If you could look at it, that would be awesome. Thanks!

1865:

Inhouse expert, thank you for that. It seems that the drawer is very full of socks. --

1862:

Akil muhamed, actually I have reported you to administrators in the morning. Good bye.

354:

is temporary, and is not consistent from person to person (a common characteristic of

2112: 2061: 2057:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Intermediate-term_memory

1993: 1944: 1896: 1781: 1599: 1403:

My pleasure; you're very welcome. (I've moved it to its own thread at the bottom.) --

1231: 1202: 1031: 999: 966: 914:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

691: 1598:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1943:

the sock are required, so take a look at the case and decide for yourself. Regards

919: 915: 2188:

Tryptofish, I have been looking through old discussions of notability, especially

1732:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 845:

Thanks for all your insightful information and help on the verifiability thread.

2387:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2323: 2322:

Yes we need more help. Analysis these edits makes my head hurt. Taking a break.

2154: 1723: 1539:

Good to see you are still doing your excellent work all over the place! FYI

1488: 1062: 480:. If you find that you need input from more editors on an issue, you can ask at 118: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

616:

and would definitely fall foul of the footnote as proposed (because Epeefleche

2295: 2006:

Thanks Looie, and done. Actually, that's exactly what I have come to think. --

1580: 1030:

Great! I much prefer it with attribution, but somehow I thought I should ask.

432: 424: 388: 376: 364: 300: 1613:

Thanks. I've replied, so please let me know if I've covered what you want. --

527:. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of 2126:

I've commented there. As you will see, there is some potential overlap with

846: 790: 756: 1450:. If you feel strongly about it, by all means we can discuss it further at 1012:

CC-BY-SA 3.0 notwithstanding, attribution would be welcome! (Oh, wait, SA

428: 416: 412: 348:

is meant, and do not make it clear that any "antidepressive" effect of

1808:. I'll put the page on my watchlist, and try to help out if I can. -- 1719: 889: 427:

only show a "statistically significant", short-term benefit over a

116: 2250:. (Or feel free to reply on my talk page, if you prefer.) - Dank ( 2225:

Thank you for having a look at it, and for your congratulations.

957:

Question... I still think the entire CHALLENGE section would be

408: 1519:

Thanks! That's so nice of you, and I'm incredibly flattered! --

1487:

Thank you for scientific quality contributions, for example on

1258:

User_talk:Zzsignup#claims of "controversial" must be attributed

2366: 1681: 786: 707:(when I try to put it actually in the box it breaks something) 115:

There are a number of us that have concerns as discussed here

25: 1730:

Template:Did you know nominations/Brain Activity Map Project

1710:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 751:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

733: 2196:

and give me your thoughts - preferably on its talk page?

307:

The first article does not make it absolutely clear that

933:

Sorry bot, but no, the edit that way was intentional. --

2150: 1492: 1424: 996: 888:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 708: 476:(again, in terms of MEDRS), and see if you can come to 1728:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

747:

Message added 13:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC). You can

318:is ambiguous", and then repeatedly uses the term 2085:. I've accepted it into the main article space, 338:The second and third articles also use the term 1543:that might be useful in another week or two. -- 880:Disambiguation link notification for January 26 367:has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of 1718:has the goal of mapping the activity of every 740:Hello, Tryptofish. You have new messages at 395:affect everyone differently, and because the 8: 1828:Removed potentially libelous material, per 1575:DYK nomination of Brain Activity Map Project 2288:User:Colin/Introduction to Psychology, 2013 1347:RfA: thank you for your supportive comments 523:WikiProject Today's article for improvement 363:The third article incorrectly states that " 2342:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 2030:Resolved (and I was pretty much right). -- 1637:? I would really appreciate it. Thanks! -- 137:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 1832:. You will thank me in the morning.... 1702:was updated with a fact from the article 673: 331:Major depressive disorder#Antidepressants 2104:Thanks! Could you look at this one too? 1939:Well like I said, diffs from the master 2271:, not that I had much of an opinion. -- 1301:RfA concerns raised regarding TfD merge 1056:Hi Tryptofish, I received your message 2385:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1446:therefore we need to be careful about 1099: 397:placebo effect#Mechanism_of_the_effect 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1824:Potentially libelous material removed 1248:additional discussion about RfC topic 1121:cat-herding abilities. Best regards, 264:You responded to edits I made to the 7: 2046:Could you take a look at my article? 1254:Talk:Joseph_Kony#Request_for_comment 1230:Cool, thanks for taking care of it. 742:Knowledge (XXG) talk: Verifiability 2184:Can you have a look at this essay? 1678:DYK for Brain Activity Map Project 1423:On WP:Verifiability you described 1077:where I'll be watching. Thanks. -- 24: 2242: 864:Thank you! It was my pleasure. -- 2370: 2262: 2076: 1685: 1653: 1639:Life is like a box of chocolates 1579: 1476: 1276: 1100: 831: 674: 555: 507: 231: 29: 403:, a valid clinical trial for a 1535:Thanks for all your good work! 1: 1772:Deletion for Harry Demopoulos 1767:16:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 1672:01:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 1647:01:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 1623:02:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 1608:04:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 1590:Did You Know nominations page 1569:22:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1553:22:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1529:22:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1512:09:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1493:from the bottom of your heart 1464:00:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 1440:00:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 1413:20:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1398:17:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1377:19:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 1362:16:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC) 1341:01:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 1320:16:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 1295:14:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 1270:21:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1240:20:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1226:20:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1211:19:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1184:18:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1170:16:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1155:15:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 1137:22:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 1087:21:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 1071:15:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 1039:22:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 1026:22:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 1007:22:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 991:21:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 975:15:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 943:21:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 928:11:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 874:21:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 856:01:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 814:21:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 800:01:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 781:19:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 766:13:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 723:18:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 700:18:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 659:02:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 645:01:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 630:01:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 602:23:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 584:01:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 540:00:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 250:22:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 226:06:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 161:Feedback response guidelines 494:23:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 457:19:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 202:14:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 186:02:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 154:21:49, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 139:19:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 106:January, 2013 – March, 2013 2457: 2358:01:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 2344:01:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 2318:00:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 2302:23:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 2281:23:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 2256:19:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 2235:00:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC) 2221:23:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 2206:00:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 2178:19:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 2163:19:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 2140:00:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 2121:23:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 2099:19:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 2070:04:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 2040:23:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 1715:Brain Activity Map Project 1706:Brain Activity Map Project 1662:. Thanks for asking me. -- 1586:Brain Activity Map Project 1584:Hello! Your submission of 1495:, - repeating: you are an 684:The Barnstar of Good Humor 2016:21:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 2002:02:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 1987:01:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 1967:00:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 1935:21:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 1919:21:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 1875:16:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 1857:04:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 1842:02:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 1818:18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 1798:15:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 1106: 830: 680: 563:The Barnstar of Diligence 554: 519:. You're invited to join 506: 369:major depressive disorder 328:is meant. The subsection 310:Major depressive disorder 289:Major depressive disorder 206:Looks like it is stable. 2087:Intermediate-term memory 1744:and it will be added to 1750:Did you know? talk page 1595:your nomination's entry 1265:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1110:The Good Heart Barnstar 484:. I hope that helps! -- 482:WT:WikiProject Medicine 407:would require that the 260:Knowledge (XXG) Quality 2243:We'd like your opinion 1383:Thanks for the welcome 1195:evolution of the brain 738: 500:An invitation for you! 2383:of past discussions. 737: 42:of past discussions. 2128:Retrograde signaling 1541:here is some reading 916:opt-out instructions 839:The Special Barnstar 438:Antidepressants are 144:Commented at ANI. -- 18:User talk:Tryptofish 898:fix with Dab solver 824:A barnstar for you! 548:A barnstar for you! 1497:awesome Wikipedian 906:• Join us at the 749:remove this notice 739: 667:A barnstar for you 440:psychoactive drugs 401:psychoactive drugs 393:psychoactive drugs 357:psychoactive drugs 274:Psychoactive drugs 2444: 2443: 2395: 2394: 2389:current talk page 1756: 1755: 1743: 1499:(27 April 2010)! 1448:instruction creep 1266: 1142: 1141: 911: 861: 860: 705: 704: 589: 588: 545: 544: 538: 531:. Happy editing! 517:Hello, Tryptofish 405:psychoactive drug 267:Psychoactive drug 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2448: 2422: 2397: 2396: 2374: 2373: 2367: 2328: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2050:Hey Tryptofish, 1963: 1954: 1949: 1915: 1906: 1901: 1778:Harry Demopoulos 1733: 1694:25 February 2013 1689: 1682: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1583: 1480: 1437: 1432: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1267: 1264: 1165: 1164:Mr. Stradivarius 1133: 1127: 1104: 1097: 1096: 901: 894:check to confirm 886:Action potential 853: 835: 828: 827: 797: 763: 752: 678: 671: 670: 657: 628: 559: 552: 551: 537: 535:Northamerica1000 532: 524: 518: 511: 504: 503: 399:also applies to 345:major depression 325:major depression 239: 235: 234: 123: 111:User in question 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2418: 2371: 2324: 2291: 2263: 2261: 2245: 2186: 2148: 2077: 2075: 2048: 1964: 1961: 1950: 1945: 1916: 1913: 1902: 1897: 1883: 1826: 1774: 1680: 1654: 1652: 1631: 1629:Composite image 1577: 1537: 1516: 1515: 1484:brain and heart 1481: 1472: 1435: 1430: 1421: 1385: 1349: 1303: 1277: 1275: 1262: 1250: 1198: 1163: 1131: 1123: 1095: 1054: 951: 908:DPL WikiProject 882: 847: 826: 791: 757: 753: 746: 731: 669: 650: 621: 610: 550: 533: 522: 516: 502: 421:clinical trials 385:clinical trials 373:clinical trials 351:antidepressants 279:antidepressants 262: 232: 230: 164: 119: 113: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2454: 2452: 2442: 2441: 2436: 2433: 2428: 2423: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2403: 2393: 2392: 2375: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2147: 2146:The timestamps 2144: 2143: 2142: 2102: 2101: 2047: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 1960: 1912: 1882: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1863: 1849:Inhouse expert 1825: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1773: 1770: 1754: 1753: 1690: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1630: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1486: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1384: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1328: 1327: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1140: 1139: 1125:TransporterMan 1113: 1112: 1107: 1105: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 950: 949:Mending fences 947: 946: 945: 881: 878: 877: 876: 859: 858: 842: 841: 836: 825: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 745: 732: 730: 727: 726: 725: 703: 702: 687: 686: 681: 679: 668: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 609: 606: 605: 604: 587: 586: 566: 565: 560: 549: 546: 543: 542: 513: 512: 501: 498: 497: 496: 295:Antidepressant 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 163: 158: 157: 156: 112: 109: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2453: 2440: 2437: 2434: 2432: 2429: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2402: 2399: 2398: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381: 2376: 2369: 2368: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2327: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2300: 2297: 2289: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2269: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2227:RockMagnetist 2224: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2198:RockMagnetist 2195: 2191: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2083: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2051: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1974:stylistically 1970: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1957: 1955: 1953: 1948: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1909: 1907: 1905: 1900: 1893: 1888: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786:Peter Proctor 1783: 1782:User:Pproctor 1779: 1771: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1751: 1747: 1741: 1737: 1731: 1727: 1726:in ten years? 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1712:... that the 1709: 1708: 1707: 1701: 1700: 1699:Did you know? 1695: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1485: 1479: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1433: 1431:Pass a Method 1426: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1259: 1255: 1247: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1196: 1193: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1128: 1126: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1052:Mailing lists 1051: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 979: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 955: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 929: 925: 921: 917: 912: 909: 905: 899: 895: 891: 887: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862: 857: 854: 852: 851: 844: 843: 840: 837: 834: 829: 823: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 798: 796: 795: 788: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 769: 768: 767: 764: 762: 761: 750: 743: 736: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 685: 682: 677: 672: 666: 660: 656: 655: 648: 647: 646: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 631: 627: 626: 619: 615: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 585: 581: 577: 572: 568: 567: 564: 561: 558: 553: 547: 541: 536: 530: 526: 525: 515: 514: 510: 505: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 474: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 454: 450: 444: 441: 436: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 383:In fact, the 381: 378: 374: 370: 366: 361: 359: 358: 353: 352: 347: 346: 341: 336: 333: 332: 327: 326: 321: 317: 312: 311: 305: 303: 302: 297: 296: 291: 290: 283: 280: 276: 275: 269: 268: 259: 251: 247: 243: 238: 229: 228: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 190: 189: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 170: 162: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 122: 117: 110: 108: 107: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2419: 2384: 2378: 2325: 2292: 2267: 2252:push to talk 2246: 2187: 2149: 2111: 2106: 2103: 2081: 2060: 2055: 2052: 2049: 1973: 1951: 1946: 1940: 1903: 1898: 1891: 1886: 1884: 1845: 1834:Akil muhamed 1827: 1776:The article 1775: 1757: 1713: 1711: 1704: 1703: 1697: 1658: 1632: 1593: 1578: 1538: 1504:Gerda Arendt 1501: 1483: 1482: 1422: 1386: 1350: 1308: 1304: 1281: 1252:At this RfC 1251: 1199: 1161: 1160: 1124: 1118: 1109: 1055: 1013: 962: 958: 956: 952: 913: 883: 849: 848: 838: 793: 792: 759: 758: 754: 706: 683: 651: 622: 617: 611: 576:Kevin Gorman 562: 520: 445: 437: 382: 362: 355: 349: 343: 339: 337: 329: 323: 319: 315: 308: 306: 299: 293: 287: 284: 272: 265: 263: 240:. Thanks. -- 236: 207: 167: 165: 120: 114: 105: 104: 78: 43: 37: 2377:This is an 1759:Carabinieri 1740:quick check 1724:human brain 1489:Aquascaping 1390:Msplanchard 1354:Dirtlawyer1 1312:Dirtlawyer1 1119:outstanding 785:Ref #81 on 36:This is an 2439:Archive 25 2431:Archive 23 2426:Archive 22 2420:Archive 21 2414:Archive 20 2409:Archive 19 2401:Archive 15 2350:Tryptofish 2310:Tryptofish 2273:Tryptofish 2213:Tryptofish 2194:this essay 2170:Tryptofish 2132:Tryptofish 2091:Tryptofish 2032:Tryptofish 2008:Tryptofish 1979:Tryptofish 1927:Tryptofish 1867:Tryptofish 1810:Tryptofish 1780:is one of 1736:here's how 1664:Tryptofish 1615:Tryptofish 1561:Tryptofish 1521:Tryptofish 1456:Tryptofish 1405:Tryptofish 1369:Tryptofish 1333:Tryptofish 1287:Tryptofish 1218:Tryptofish 1176:Tryptofish 1147:Tryptofish 1079:Tryptofish 1018:Tryptofish 983:Tryptofish 935:Tryptofish 918:. Thanks, 866:Tryptofish 806:Tryptofish 773:Tryptofish 715:Tryptofish 637:Tryptofish 594:Tryptofish 486:Tryptofish 433:duloxetine 425:duloxetine 389:duloxetine 377:duloxetine 365:Duloxetine 340:depression 320:depression 316:depression 301:Duloxetine 242:Tryptofish 194:Tryptofish 146:Tryptofish 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 23 85:Archive 22 79:Archive 21 73:Archive 20 68:Archive 19 60:Archive 15 2326:Doc James 1790:Smokefoot 1545:Noleander 902:Read the 478:consensus 209:Callanecc 169:Callanecc 121:Doc James 2336:contribs 2190:this one 2113:Rob Hurt 2062:Rob Hurt 1994:Looie496 1892:at least 1746:DYKSTATS 1600:Chris857 1470:Precious 1232:Looie496 1203:Looie496 1032:Bishonen 1000:Bishonen 967:Blueboar 729:Talkback 692:CarrieVS 614:WP:RFC/U 464:WP:MEDRS 415:and the 218:contribs 178:contribs 131:contribs 2380:archive 1881:Re: SPI 1722:in the 1588:at the 963:nuances 920:DPL bot 571:WP:AFSE 529:members 473:be bold 429:placebo 417:placebo 413:control 39:archive 2155:Risker 1962:berate 1914:berate 1830:wp:blp 1806:WP:AFD 1720:neuron 1419:differ 1263:TRPoD 1063:Risker 959:better 890:Efflux 654:danjel 649:True! 625:danjel 608:Claude 468:WP:COI 449:KMLion 411:, the 342:where 322:where 2340:email 2296:Colin 1260:. -- 1093:Award 569:When 135:email 16:< 2354:talk 2332:talk 2314:talk 2277:talk 2268:Done 2231:talk 2217:talk 2202:talk 2174:talk 2159:talk 2136:talk 2130:. -- 2117:talk 2095:talk 2082:Done 2066:talk 2036:talk 2012:talk 1998:talk 1983:talk 1952:lisk 1947:Basa 1931:talk 1904:lisk 1899:Basa 1871:talk 1853:talk 1838:talk 1814:talk 1794:talk 1763:talk 1668:talk 1659:Done 1643:talk 1635:here 1619:talk 1604:talk 1565:talk 1549:talk 1525:talk 1508:talk 1460:talk 1454:. -- 1452:WT:V 1436:talk 1425:this 1409:talk 1394:talk 1373:talk 1358:talk 1337:talk 1316:talk 1291:talk 1285:. -- 1282:Done 1236:talk 1222:talk 1207:talk 1180:talk 1151:talk 1132:TALK 1083:talk 1067:talk 1058:here 1036:talk 1022:talk 1014:does 1004:talk 987:talk 971:talk 939:talk 924:talk 870:talk 850:Till 810:talk 794:Till 777:talk 760:Till 719:talk 696:talk 641:talk 598:talk 580:talk 490:talk 453:talk 423:for 409:drug 387:for 375:for 298:and 246:talk 237:Done 222:logs 214:talk 198:talk 182:logs 174:talk 150:talk 127:talk 1941:and 1887:and 1692:On 904:FAQ 787:KFC 618:has 360:). 2435:→ 2405:← 2356:) 2338:· 2334:· 2316:) 2279:) 2254:) 2233:) 2219:) 2204:) 2176:) 2161:) 2138:) 2119:) 2097:) 2068:) 2038:) 2014:) 2000:) 1985:) 1933:) 1873:) 1855:) 1840:) 1816:) 1796:) 1765:) 1738:, 1696:, 1670:) 1645:) 1621:) 1606:) 1567:) 1559:-- 1551:) 1527:) 1510:) 1502:-- 1462:) 1411:) 1396:) 1388:-- 1375:) 1360:) 1339:) 1318:) 1293:) 1238:) 1224:) 1209:) 1182:) 1153:) 1135:) 1085:) 1069:) 1034:| 1024:) 1009:. 1002:| 989:) 973:) 941:) 926:) 896:| 872:) 812:) 789:. 779:) 721:) 698:) 643:) 600:) 582:) 492:) 455:) 435:. 292:, 248:) 224:) 220:• 216:• 200:) 192:-- 184:) 180:• 176:• 152:) 133:· 129:· 94:→ 64:← 2391:. 2352:( 2330:( 2312:( 2298:° 2275:( 2229:( 2215:( 2200:( 2172:( 2157:( 2134:( 2115:( 2093:( 2064:( 2034:( 2010:( 1996:( 1981:( 1958:⁄ 1929:( 1910:⁄ 1869:( 1851:( 1836:( 1812:( 1792:( 1761:( 1752:. 1742:) 1734:( 1666:( 1641:( 1617:( 1602:( 1563:( 1547:( 1523:( 1506:( 1458:( 1407:( 1392:( 1371:( 1356:( 1335:( 1314:( 1289:( 1234:( 1220:( 1205:( 1178:( 1149:( 1129:( 1081:( 1065:( 1041:. 1020:( 985:( 969:( 937:( 922:( 910:. 892:( 868:( 808:( 775:( 744:. 717:( 694:( 652:˜ 639:( 623:˜ 596:( 578:( 488:( 451:( 244:( 212:( 196:( 172:( 148:( 125:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index