User talk:Turkeybutt JC - Knowledge (XXG)

3243:

is the only language I fully understand, but apparently, I am illiaterate. But I refuse to say I am wrong because an admin has told me that the "oh woe is me" thing doesn't work. He even swears the P word that is one of the seven dirty words. Okay, fine, I am wrong. And so is every admin and experienced user ever. But it is interesting to note that, however, the greatest thing about Knowledge (XXG); is that you get to place in biased statements in Knowledge (XXG)'s articles and many users won't mind, and any attempt to make Knowledge (XXG) neutral will get you blocked. Don't follow NPOV. Admins always block neutralists, so don't take NPOV seriously. NPOV is a very, very, bad philosophy that should be scrapped for good. Because NPOV is just a scam to trick gullible editors like me into making disruptive edits. I think English is my mother tongue, since it is the only language I understand, say, read and write in, but it turns out that I am alingual or illingual since I haven't learned every possibel spellling, I always learned the spelling "material" but it turns out the word "materiel" is correct according to Dr. K. Or maybe every single word is being spelt and pronounced wrong. Language doesn't exist. NPOV doesn't exist. We have to write from a biased viewpoint. No exceptions. NPOV is just a big fat lie to manipulate gullible masses so they can't edit Knowledge (XXG) and Knowledge (XXG) can be very contradictory and contradict itself and not be faithful. Knowledge (XXG) is not reliable and never will be. It's not supposed to be reliable in the first place, because neutrality is a very, very, very bad idea. We should be focusing on getting our points across instead of making it more neutral. I'd like to nominate all neutralist pages for deletion. As one of my userboxes said, I am a very paranoid user who started assuming bad faith. And all the admins I've met so far are violating the entire Trifecta (ignore all rules, mind NPOV, don't be a jerk). Or as I stereotype. I hate Knowledge (XXG) because it is the most biased encyclopedia ever and you are no--

3918:

there is no consensus for block requests? It's not fair because a really stupid Wikipedian can easily be permanently be blocked from every Wikimedia ever and have every privilege ever stripped from them by just one really angry admin. Why can't there be consensus between admins on whether a user should be blocked or not? I think a consensus would be fair because the opinions of other admins would determine the outcome, that way the admins who oppose to the blocks can have their voices heard in this situation so the user about to be blocked can be saved by other admins through consensus. Some admins will support the block and others will oppose it and others will just comment on it. And possibly some experienced editors, IP editors and newcomers may be able to help such consensus too, so many supporters vs. many opposers will make it so that it's multiple Wikipedians who determine the outcome, not just one angry admin. There are many people agreeing with the angry admin, but there are also many people who take the stupid editor's side as well, and a consensus will help the stupid editor's supporters get their voices heard. Does anyone else think that is a good idea? --

3820:

policies that have the same rules as on Knowledge (XXG) but is interpreted the same way throughout the Wiki because it reads in an easy-to-understand way so there are no conflicts over how to properly interpret the policies and reasoning can come pretty fast but despite having similar policies to Knowledge (XXG); won't have any way to block or ban users if they make too many stupid edits or write too much or even for harassing editors and calling them names like "disruptive" and "incompetent" too much but there are no ads so no lag or accidentally clicking one or stumbling on a bad one. I think that would be a good one because stupid people would be politely dealt with instead of being kicked from the site but still has similar copyright policy and other kinds of policy like Knowledge (XXG), but there is no 'competence is required' policy so stupid people don't get discriminated against. #DumbLivesMatter #NoobLivesMatter #AllLivesMatter --

1182:

it particularly hard on them to do so. For example, I would object to "nicknamed", as I do not think it sounds more neutral, and I do not think "known as" is a weasel word. Nor do I agree with switching to "BCE", as that is not used anywhere else in the article and we try to stay consistent. If you did that edit in, I don't know, 5-10 separate passes, then people could object to what they object to, and leave what they don't. But you can't come to an article and demand people try to piece together 5, or 30, changes that they object to out of a 50 change edit. Nor can you demand 9000% certainty. The people who edited this article before you chose to do things a certain way. Sometimes right, sometimes wrong, sometimes a judgement call. I think you will find many other copy editors do it piecemeal for that very reason; because you are trying to help those who came before, not impose conditions on them. --

1757:. That is to say there are few absolutes on Knowledge (XXG). If an actor were described as well known, that would most likely be puffery. Let me give you a precise analogy to the situation at hand. If the article on Foo Industries described their factory as high tech, that would most likely be puffery. However, to say that Palo Alto, California is a center of high tech industry most assuredly would not be puffery. Please keep in mind this is a collaborative project. If your first instinct is to argue if someone disagrees with you, you won't last long. Speaking in the tone you used to 1365:: Your removal of the adjective "sole" destroys meaning, please restore it. Your insistence on "is located in" creates repetitive, awkward writing when used in every single instance; please stop using it for two sentences in a row. The sentence about PCSSD high schools was much less awkward before, please restore it. Ditto the sentence about libraries. The removal of puffery around the universities was a big improvement. (This post shows why you should break up edits. I am trying this as an alternative to reverting all your edits to the article, let's see how it goes.) -- 3218:" The first problem, a major one, is that "visited to the school" is highly ungrammatical English. In fact, it reads much like machine translation, which swaps in grammar from another language that just does not work at all in English. But more critically, I think you wanted to replace this because you took "special" as POV under one of that word's potential meanings "extraordinary and unique", when it is being used here for an entirely different meaning (that is absolutely standard English) – in this context, making a 1324:, which includes stray formatting messing things up, typos, grammatical errors, and a wide variety of other nonsense; the only obviously decent part of it was to get rid of "state-of-the-art". (I've now re-done that change, in a way that wasn't drastically disruptive and guaranteed to be reverted.) I'm a bit surprised and disappointed, because you did not strike me initially as someone who was trying to troll. If you're looking for ways to edit constructively, I'm still happy to chat (though I'm rather busy IRL). -- 3779:...a more reasonable community that won't punish / block / ban me for over-making a million mistakes in my editing in a short time or going too crazy on the Wiki or getting in too many edit wars with potential vandals or reverting non-neutral contributions or for writing too much to support your side of an argument and everyone gets along because everyone gets to read policy that reads similarly to WP:NPOV but is easily remembered by the community? That would make a good exile for me... 3172:

have all been reverting you. But leaving aside the "admin" quibble, the answer to the question in your section title is in the first sentence of your post. Editors are criticizing your editing philosophy because you made lots of typos and grammatical errors, your edit was inadvertently(?) disruptive, you were incompetent in the area you decided to focus on, and you were changed the meanings of the sentences you changed. That is sufficient reason to topic ban you from what

3058: 3787: 2977: 4057: 1342:, an observation: you are blocked for 31 hours. That means that, the day after tomorrow, you will be able to edit again. Renewing the conflicts in which you are embroiled will feel great for the 15 minutes until you are blocked indefinitely. On the other hand, if you sit out the block, take a step back, and plan your future engagements in a more strategic way, that doesn't need to happen. -- 3670: 2492: 3026:

extensively about all the problems with your editing, and if you don't understand what you have been told then it is difficult what new things can be said that you will be likely to understand. About the only thing I can suggest is that you forget about making changes to make articles fit what you call "NPOV", because what

1279:"black" can be stripped from the latter without destroying the meaning entirely. (One hint about this fact is the use of bold around the phrase.) The guideline you are implementing is reasonable and defensible, but there is a good reason that it begins with a bunch of text about being careful in implementing it. -- 2248:") stance is not going to work with me; I've seen the same tactic used many times before, and it doesn't gain sympathy, it reinforces my opinion that you probably don't belong here. What gains sympathy is to stop doing things that are pissing people off, and then arguing when it is pointed out to you. We'll see how 3416:

wording, in a lot of real world cases. You're looking for black and white rules, when this area is full of shades of grey. You have posted to 4-5 different pages now that people are preventing you from making articles more NPOV. That is not true. People are preventing you from making articles worse while you're

3550:

A remark on strategy: your problems here relate to editing in a way that draws too much (negative) attention. Making big dramatic gestures to draw attention to yourself will make these problems worse, not better. It would be strategically more useful to attempt to edit in a way that draws a minimum

3429:

The extent of the problem means that this is not a simple issue of someone explaining how you should do it; it means you need to mature and gain some experience. There is no clear and simple rule set to follow, it requires judgement and experience that come with time. Until then, you either need to

2555:

I wasn't reverting. I was replacing a positively loaded statement with the facts that the sources say things about Napoleon. Someone reverted it saying that dictionary.com is unreliable. So I made another revision (which is the same as before but sans the Dictionary.com reference. If it were a revert

2206:

Just because you think that something is or you think that that something is or that almost everyone agrees that something is that doesn't make it a fact, it's still an opinion, but if you want those words in the Knowledge (XXG) articles, at least cite a reliable source and put it in quotes so as

1181:

So make a few of those edits at a time (similar edits at the same time (like all the "nicknamed" together, and all the "years ago" together, and see what sticks. But you can't expect people to go thru such a large edit piece by piece, and do the hard work of sorting good from bad, when you have made

851:

during the Crusades, the Arab nations were in between Europe and Asia on the Silk Road. The Europeans did not want to go through the Arab territories to trade with China. In 1492, Christopher Columbus sought to come up with a shorter trade route to China, but by sailing west, he had landed on the New

3819:

I don't want a Wikia or Wikimedia alternative because I don't see anything I would be interested in editing. Uncyclopedia, RationalWiki and Encyclopedia Dramatica are too strange/weird. I'd like to find a good Knowledge (XXG) knockoff that still has strict but easily understood NPOV and verification

3447:

articles that you think make them "more NPOV or more clearly worded". You are also banned from using the talk page of articles to lobby for such changes. That's a very, very broad topic ban, and I fear prevents you from doing the only thing you want to do. But it is either that, or an indefinite

3171:

First, it's not admins; I'm the only admin dealing with you, the rest are regular editors, who have had to deal with your disruption. Who, contrary to your claim, have explained what is wrong with your edits in great detail on the article talk pages. Eight people, I believe, eight regular editors,

2924:

I'm sorry, but you are continuing to try to make edits you are not sufficiently competent to make, resulting in significant wasted time for many other editors, and in spite of numerous comments, suggestions, warnings, and near-universal disagreement with your edits. I appreciate the desire, but you

3647:

is that someone already commented. Turkeybutt, this isn't going to work out. I am blocking you indefinitely for disrupting, unintentionally I presume, everything you touch. Give yourself a year or two to mature, and then come back and we'll see how things have changed. Standard template will show

3242:

If I'm wrong, then all of Knowledge (XXG)'s neutralist policies are fake and wrong. It seems to me that Knowledge (XXG)'s neutralist policies are obsolete and no longer legitimate policy on Knowledge (XXG). Why didn't Knowledge (XXG) warn users that making articles more neutral is bad idea? English

2731:

The warning tag at the top of that article states: "any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page." Though you did discuss your intended edits on the talk page, you then went ahead and made significant edits before any other editors had a

1825:

And we recently got a new computer earlier this year so it seems like I didn't make the edit to the article on flags where there were flags beside every country name so that people wouldn't have to keep looking up country flags just to make sure it is right, it was reverted but mentioned as being a

1481:

Indeed, "X is home to Y" can be cliched if overused; on the other hand, "X is located in Y" is awkward and stilted if overused. (I have no idea why you think it is either "formal" or "encyclopedic.") Now that you've changed every single instance of statements about location to the latter usage, it

417:

This is why I hate uncited entries. (e.g. the first entry on the Timeline of Little Rock article) I hate having to respond by saying something on your talk page rather than respond to your message on my talk page. I think it's better for me to respond to your message on my talk page lest I get into

3917:

I think it's unfair that all it takes is one admin and then BOOM! Blocked for good from every Wiki privilege ever. It's racist against stupid people. Idiots and morons and dummies are humans too! Why have consensus for deletion, creation, moving of pages or requests for adminship or bureaucrat if

3319:

But Knowledge (XXG) articles should not tell readers that anything is usual or unusual. Let the readers decide what they think. Your interpretation of the subject and my interpretation of the subject and everyone else's interpretations of the subjects must not be written in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice

3193:

When many different people have criticized you for similar things, one seductive way of looking at it – a path of least resistance for one's ego – is to think that it must be some type of conspiracy. Once in a great while that's true – "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get

2935:

Is there anything else on WP that you'd prefer to do instead? I don't want to block you if there's another area you want to try that will be less disruptive, as it seems you are trying to help. But at the same time, I don't want to just move the same problems to a different area; that wouldn't be

3415:

I will try to be as clear as possible. The problem is not that you want to make articles more NPOV and more clearly worded, and others want to keep them POV and poorly worded. The problem is that you do not have the skills and judgement needed to determine what is more NPOV, and what is clearer

2218:

As the worst editor ever (and I think I should get a Knowledge (XXG)'s Dumbest Editor award) I'd like to figure out how to make Knowledge (XXG) articles as neutral as possible without inadvertently terrorizing its contents. I keep having to realize again and again that I have to make small edits.

2214:

or even threaten to block or ban me just because I just started this account a few weeks ago and your account was here for years collecting all kinds of knowledge and wisdom on Knowledge (XXG) but no matter how much we learn, we can never know everything. I believe that we should not let personal

3385:

I have revoked talk page access so you cannot waste anyone else's time while you're blocked. Your latest posts almost caused me to change this to an indefinite block, but in the spirit of "no one likes to be blocked", I'll give you one last chance. If anything like that happens again when your

3190:

Hi Turkeybutt JC. Other than answering one of your questions at the Teahouse (and then expanding at my talk page) we have not interacted and I was not aware of the issues discussed above until I was drawn here by the help me request and started looking at these discussions and the background at

1278:

I see that as I was writing this, you reverted. Let me elaborate on this particular example, since it's completely clear-cut: the phrase "essentially decidable" is technical language, like "black hole." The word "essentially" cannot be stripped in the former phrase any more than the adjective

3025:

I have just spent about 15 minutes reading your editing history and the history of messages others have posted about your editing problems, in the hope of finding something helpful I could say in answer to your question. I'm afraid the answer that I came to was that you have already been told

2950:

To be clearer: this includes discussion on talk pages of edits you have made in this area that have since been reverted. And, anticipating the inevitable, it also applies to lobbying for or suggesting edits in this area that you would like to make, but can't. Finally, this can be appealed at

3227:

All this is to say, I agree with the criticism you've received. I'm fairly certain, though, that there are useful things you can do on Knowledge (XXG) without running into problems. I think coming up with a plan of what you might do instead, as Floquenbeam has suggested, is a good one. Best

3201:

In short, many of your edits—intended to introduce more neutral language, to remove supposed puffery, to make articles read more formally, and various other copyedits—removed unproblematic writing, introduced errors, made flowing language stilted and so forth, as multiple other editors have

1319:

It is interesting to me that your editing is getting more agressively disruptive and problematic, rather than less. When I first noticed you (or an IP editor with extremely similar behavior), I would have said that your edits were probably 30% clear improvements, 50% meh, and 20% obvious

3152:". Most of the time, many of those admins never provide me with any good advice on how to edit right or explain using Knowledge (XXG) policy why my edits are disruptive or why they think my English is terrible. I suspect that whoever is making those excuses listed above is inadvertently 2243:

You don't really need to explain NPOV to me; I am much more familiar with it than you are. The problem is you are too inexperienced to be doing this kind of thing as quickly, frequently, carelessly, and unthinkingly as you are. And taking some kind of passive-agressive "oh woe is me",

852:

World, he colonized Cuba, Hispaniola and Puerto Rico. The imperial nations of Europe sought to colonize the New World. In 1776, thirteen British colonies declared their independence from the British Empire and unified into a Continental Congress renamed as the United States of America.

2219:

That makes sense to me because if I take too long to edit something, I'd most likely crash into an edit conflict. If I keep making multiple small edits each only changing one small area or word at a time and then telling what I did in the edit summary would that be okay?

3961:

This block wasn't a "crazy" block, to be honest, he should have blocked you sooner. You are distruptive, and clearly do not have the competence to edit Knowledge (XXG). No reasonable admin would unblock you. With your rants, you're digging yourself into a bigger hole.

1761:

above is completely inappropriate. He is a very experienced editor. You frankly look quite dumb lecturing an editor of his experience when you've been here all of a week. You cannot possibly know what he, or I, have learned in our years here. Do yourself a favor and

2761:

I was trying to make the examples more neutral. I saw lots of praise for the buildings and architecture and positive loading that made it sound like the script for a promotional New York advertisement. So I went ahead and tried to make it sound more impartial and

3774:

I quit! Can anyone find me a better non-Wikia / non-Wikimedia / non-Uncyclopedia / non-RationalWiki / non-Encyclopedia Dramatica alternative to Knowledge (XXG) that has a strict but easily understandable NPOV / verification policies like Knowledge (XXG) but

2163:

The countries that Adolf Hitler conquered included Poland, France, Hungary, and Ukraine. Fortunately, Hitler passed away in his bunker in 1945, and it is interesting to note that the racist tyrant killed himself so the Allied forces couldn't arrest him.

4069:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

460:, and your request is reasonable (i.e. if you make 5 edits and one was useful, it's reasonable to expect a reverting editor to add back the good edit). But you are not going to be able to approach editing in a collaborative environment this way. -- 1254:

is "There are no forbidden words or expressions on Knowledge (XXG)"; the second paragraph begins "The advice in this guideline is not limited to the examples provided and should not be applied rigidly." Your edits are not generally bad, but they

1714:

I believe you are mistaken about some yellow box listing "well-known". It's not there. Your edit did not improve the article and will be removed. I see I am not the first to comment on your edits. I'd also like to comment on your edit summary

1485:"Sole beneficiary" (of a will, bequest, or similar) is a standard legal term; it is precise, meaningful, and informative. Removing the adjective leaves a vague, less precise, less informative statement. You should restore the previous phrasing. 1898:

would be necessary. Why do all edits have to significantly improve the article? I don't have time for this madness. I hate all kinds of non-neutralism on Knowledge (XXG). I have an unhealthy obsession with making articles more compliant with

2534:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a 1817:

2187:

Notable Arkansans include Tom Cotton, who was representative since 2014, the well-known former president Bill Clinton, who is renowned for his famous reforms in education, and Sam Walton, founder of the celebrated discount store known as

2076:

If you do not change your approach right now, I am going to block you indefinitely. The net effect of you editing the way you are editing is to make things marginally worse, not better, and you are taking up lots of other editors' time.

790:

is subjective. What is popular to someone isn't popular to someone else. When someone tells you about something you have never heard of, it won't seem popular to you, but when you continue to look it up, it'll start to seem popular to

1044:; ... legendary, great, acclaimed, visionary, outstanding, leading, celebrated, award-winning, landmark, cutting-edge, innovative, extraordinary, brilliant, hit, famous, renowned, remarkable, prestigious, world-class, respected, 4021:. A user who has been banned from the English Knowledge (XXG) cannot edit on the site at all, not even on a talk page. A ban does not automatically carry over to other Knowledge (XXG) sites, although there is a procedure for a 3300:

Given your prior response, I'm not going to spend much time here. Your post above proves my point. Your comment that "what may seem special to you may not seem special to other" means you have the misunderstanding I suspected.

3198:; you're the one with the problem, and so you need to step back, realize you might be in the wrong, do your best to drop the defenses you've erected, and take heed of advice you've been given. This is one of those situations. 3755:

more uninvolved admin to review this, then feel free to make an unblock request, but if it is declined I am going to remove talk page access. I already feel bad that I've allowed you to disrupt so many other people.

4097: 3320:

but should be explained in a fair, impartial and unbiased way. All that Knowledge (XXG) articles have to do is just state the facts in a neutral way, cite and verify reliable sources and explain the sides fairly. --

1691:

is listed. So it is a peacock term. It can be used in a positively loaded sense. Knowledge (XXG) articles should be written in a neutrally loaded sense. Knowledge (XXG) articles need to be in an impartial tone and

3009:

How do I stop editing disruptively? Apparently every single edit I make in the name of NPOV seems disruptive to many people. I'd like some pointers on how to edit in a NPOV way without disrupting Knowledge (XXG).

3123:

When I try to make an article more neutral, I often get my edits reverted by admins who use excuses such as "you made lots of typos and grammatical errors" or "your edit was inadvertently disruptive" or "you are

1664:, you tagged the phrase "well-known" in the following sentence as being a "peacock term": "The "little rock" was used by early river traffic as a landmark and became a well-known river crossing". Please look at 2822:

This is an idiotic position, and you should drop the distracting nonsense about behavior (because any reasonable person would have behaved the same way) and instead focus on the legitimate substantive problems.

2583:

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors'

921:... recently, lately, currently, today, presently, to date, 15 years ago, formerly, in the past, traditionally, this/last/next (year/month/winter/spring/summer/fall/autumn), yesterday, tomorrow, in the future, 1414:

In addition, students have access to services they enjoy at the main campus—a library, computer labs, tutoring services, student services, all housed in an attractive new location with cutting-edge technology.

665:

celebrated, award-winning, landmark, cutting-edge, innovative, extraordinary, brilliant, hit, famous, renowned, remarkable, prestigious, world-class, respected, notable, virtuoso, honorable, awesome, unique

2252:

works, and then go from there. Perhaps that solves the problem, perhaps you'll be topic banned from copyediting, or perhaps you'll be blocked. But you are not going to continue wasting other people's time.

1488:

You have neglected to respond to my comment about the extremely awkward construction "PCSSD high schools are located in the city such as." You should either restore the earlier phrasing or find a third

4004:

Blocks, by their nature, require swift action. That's why we have the unblock policy: it allows other administrators to review a block and see if it's appropriate or not. (By the way, deletion does not

1516:", although my earlier statement about it was wrong: the problem is not that the new sentence is awkward but that you changed the meaning in a misleading way. You should restore the previous phrasing. 3030:

mean by that is out of line with the consensus. Try doing other kinds of editing instead. I am leaving your request for help open, in case someone else can suggest something else that may be helpful.

4081:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3751:

was just the last straw. And it appears on your user page you just admitted to block evasion. But even if you weren't a returing disruptive editor, you are not competent to edit here. If you want

1809:

How do we know for almost absolute certain if any particular cities are centers of high tech industry or not? High-tech can be subjective. VHS tapes may seem high-tech in 1950 but primitive in 2050.

3470:

Asking for help on Jimbo Wales's talk page is a terrible idea. It wastes everyone's time, and doesn't have anything to do with Jimbo. Ask on your own talk page or something. Also, please read

2203:

Do you really think that the positive loading and puffing in the red text is really necessary for Knowledge (XXG) articles? I don't think so. I'm one of those strictly neutralist Wikipedians.

1806:

At least quote and cite some sources that mention that Palo Alto is "a center of high tech industry" or that the little rock is "a well-known rock formation". What does 'well-known' even mean?

4130: 2936:

fair to other editors either. So consider what you'd like to do instead, and consider whether it matches your skill set, whether it is less likely to be disruptive, and let me know here. --

4029:; people don't usually get banned for stupidity, but more for malice or flagrant disruption.But back to your original request: no, blocks should not require consensus before implementing. — 3222:

trip to the school, where one does or would not do so regularly. So not only did this change replace a grammatical statement with broken English, but it changed the meaning, for no purpose.

3534:

said, you are incredibly close to an indef block right now. If this continues, an admin will block you an a nanosecond. Be careful. I would suggest taking a break from Knowledge (XXG).

34: 23: 2198:

People such as Tom Cotton, who became an Arkansas representative in 2014: Bill Clinton, who was president of the United States from 1993 to 2001; and Sam Walton, founder of Wal-Mart.

2174:

Adolf Hitler conquered various countries such as Poland, France, Hungary, and Ukraine. In 1945, Hitler died in his bunker via suicide to avoid getting arrested by the Allied forces.

166: 1826:

good faith edit. I've been focusing on making Knowledge (XXG) more neutral, indifferent, impartial and more encyclopedic. You and I might know things that the other doesn't know.

3935:"It's racist against stupid people"? Pretty sure that race doesn't apply in stupidity. Also, you do not need to gain consensus to block, admins are trusted to make good blocks. 707: 1797:

But that may be positive loading, and that is what Knowledge (XXG) articles should not have. Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't promote, highlight or demean anything. But it should put

3191:

various pages. I am saying that so that you know I am an independent party, making an independent assessment (or, at least, you'll just have to trust me that that's the case).

2139:

too seriously. I do get that a large edit is more likely to hit an edit conflict since they take more time to do. I just can't help myself. I want to replace every mention of

516:

Wordings such as "17 years ago" or "Jones is 65 years old" should be rewritten as "in 1999", "Jones was 65 years old at the time of the incident", or "Jones was born in 1951".

2341:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

1820:

Good point; although I've been on Knowledge (XXG) some years longer than this account which I just set up this August, so it seems I haven't been on Knowledge (XXG) for long.

2930:

So, for starters, consider yourself topic banned from copy editing, and from "making articles more NPOV", and similar editing. I will block you from editing if you continue.

530:

The first known publication of the phrase "United States of America" was in an anonymous essay in The Virginia Gazette newspaper in Williamsburg, Virginia, on April 6, 1776.

695:

is necessary. Do you think it is necessary? If so, why? Any policies or guidelines supporting this? The context doesn't seem to need those four words at all to me though...

2279:

I know that Knowledge (XXG) is not censored and is not a children's encyclopedia but that's no excuse for admins and other people to use dirty words or naughty language.

1922:

I've fixed your formatting. In my opinion, both versions are pretty terrible: awkwardly worded, and providing information in an unclear and difficult to assess way. --

4017:

to mitigate inappropriate deletion.The mechanism you're talking about—revoking a user's privileges of all sorts on Knowledge (XXG) after a consensus discussion—is the

3401:

Could you specify what I'm topic banned from? You forgot to specify what I'm topic banned from. What topic was the Braille article in that I was topic banned from? --

2857:

to respond to an experienced user in an advisory tone. Experienced users can need some reminders too. You seemed to have been corrupted by your own bragging rights.

3837:

What the heck? You clearly don't have the ability to edit Knowledge (XXG), so I don't think you would have the skills to edit another wiki. Also, have you actually

611:

is an idiom. If it was taken literally then it would seem as if America was working with the Allies to mess with how water flows so the Central powers could lose.

4134: 2886:

Please don't add unblock requests to your sandbox when you are not blocked, as it adds you to the list of unblock requests and wastes admins' time investigating.

456:

I've reverted all that. You cannot make +/- 50 edits, about 3/4 of them not improvements, and expect others to go back thru and pick out the ones that helped.

307: 306: 2725: 2718: 2296:

Don't be silly. If you want to choose to focus on that one issue, that's fine. But the fact remains that I will block you if the disruption continues. --

1665: 1052:

Many potential refs and sources do say that it is one of the greatest films, but that doesn't mean it can just be directly stated by the article itself.

2155:

is more accurate. I don't believe that articles should say nice or rude things about anything, they should just assume indifference towards everything.

385: 324:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and get help from experienced editors like 3156:

me and my editing skills and my neutralist philosophy. It seems that they are putting sameness of wording above reliability, verification and NPOV. --

55: 3286:. What may seem special to you may not seem special to other readers and editors. Someone else could've fixed the typos and grammar errors for me. -- 193: 2515:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 3352:

against a generally accepted consensensus. Rember what the man said: In the fifteenth-century, WP wouold have reported that the earth was flat...

95: 3695: 3082: 2323: 1080:

because what is major to one person is minor to another. But it does make sense to give undue weight to things without highlighting anything.

1904: 575:. Although this isn't the Simple English Knowledge (XXG). At least I don't have to use a limited vocabulary on this English Knowledge (XXG). 4111: 3430:

go somewhere else, or (if possible) find something else to do here that more closely matches your skill set, if you can and if you want to.

2530:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 3947:

What if admins go crazy and block every single user who annoys them or disagrees with them and take all privileges from all Wikimedias? --

1478:

This long list of bullet points is largely unresponsive to what I wrote. I respond to the relevant points, and repeat those you ignored.

2955:, but I suggest not doing so before you've demonstrated non-disruptive editing in other areas, as the appeal would likely be rejected. -- 2687:

Someone told me that dictionary.com was unreliable. That's why I put the tag. I could've as well said this on the Napoleon talk page. --

1980:

didn't need one of your seemingly endless tags. Really, it didn't. It did need something, but not a tag. Please take a moment to read

2609:

So, the positively loaded statement is allowed to act like a fact in the article when it just expresses positive bias towards Napoleon?

3898: 3520: 3362: 1562:

and putting all those locations together into one big prose-list because English grammar allows such a shortening. I could've changed

3806: 2996: 381: 374: 232: 84: 3510:

after coming off an almost indef (see above) block... was little more than trolling. And that would be a slipery slope. Just FYI.

3176:

is NPOVist editing. I'll leave the help template unchanged, so someone uninvolved can take a look and give you a ninth opinion. --

1390:

is more formal and accurate and seems more encyclopedic, despite there being no policies / guidelines for or against either terms.

252: 3845: 1981: 4107: 1493: 814:

How do we know he was little-known during his time? This is not right. How do we know if he was major or not? Then who was the

4090: 3687: 3621: 158: 3691: 3493: 3336: 3078: 1766:(another pillar policy, by the way) when someone tries to guide you through the minefield that this project can be. Thanks. 370: 246: 1259:

overly rigid, mechanical applications of advice. The result is that occasionally your edits are very bad; for example, in

3889: 3531: 3511: 3353: 2891: 1894:

is ridiculous if there is no date specified for when the town was renamed to Kanakapur. We need a policy to tell us where

1163:

I didn't mention every bit of my contribution though. But that is why I assume that much of that revision I made was good.

1410:

mean? I don't think that word is necessary and it seems to make whatever sentence it is put in to seem less encyclopedic.

205: 2275:

What gains sympathy is to stop doing things that are ticking people off, and then arguing when it is pointed out to you.

2269:

What gains sympathy is to stop doing things that are ****ing people off, and then arguing when it is pointed out to you.

3682: 3677: 3506:

a good idea right now?) on one of the most high-profie pages out of the five and a half million the project possesses,

3065: 2535: 2527: 2478: 2464: 2095:

Even after all this I'm not sure it will be productive to have you continue trying to copyedit here. But if you don't

1123:

Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't read like an editorial summary or the script of a TED-Ed video. Knowledge (XXG) wants to put

4102: 3986: 3970: 3939: 3877: 3852: 3538: 3482: 1829:

Wikipedians don't have power over eachother. (except for admins, bureaucrats, stewards, the Arbitration Committee and

4018: 2512: 2507:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is known as " 389: 354: 150: 3502:

is being far too polite. Some would cogently argue that making posts like that (I mean, criticizing administrators;

1771: 1420:

is puffery. I believe that all editorial opinions or other non-neutral statements should be put in quotes. Because

768: 757: 331: 3310: 3262: 3233: 2647:

I agree. Now I see the editor has added some tags at the lead without justifying them on the talkpage. This is a

407: 396: 3149: 3128:" or "you changed many meanings", and when I try to explain to them, I sometimes get responses such as "if it's 3074: 2531: 2508: 2496: 1127:

on stuff, not highlight them. Knowledge (XXG) articles should be written from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral perspective.}}

138: 44: 2887: 1745:

Sorry, Turkeybutt, but you are being a turkey butt here. Used in that manner, well known is in no way puffery.

1320:

disimprovements. But your recent edits are coming in almost entirely as disimprovement. E.g., take a look at

634: 4078: 3202:

independently advised you. Let me just give you one example, in excruciating detail, to illustrate the point:

2648: 1697: 1482:

is badly overused, and I have requested an extremely moderate amount of revision. Are you planning to revise?

40: 2032:

It is obvious that I am the worst neutralist editor ever, unless you have encountered worse china-shop bulls.

756:, which had appeared in the post-World War II period, gained wide popularity as a term for the post-Cold War 3747:

You've complained about this on 4 different pages, saying increasingly silly things each time. The post to

3556: 2828: 2752: 2135:

Recently, I've had this extremely unhealthy obsession with editing articles. Apparently I seem to be taking

1927: 1668:

and explain how "well-known"--particularly in the context of this sentence--is a peacock term? Thank you.

1633: 1594: 1526: 1370: 1347: 1329: 1284: 1268: 1016: 994: 4126: 2351: 2346: 1455:

because I thought it was a pufferous or editorial word. I just googled the definition and it is defined as

621:

If a literal interpretation of a phrase makes no sense in the context of a sentence, it should be reworded.

240: 130: 3983: 3967: 3936: 3874: 3849: 3590: 3535: 3499: 3479: 3041: 1513: 1497: 715: 51: 3748: 2628: 2516: 2472: 1058: 259: 122: 3885: 3761: 3715: 3653: 3453: 3391: 3181: 3102: 2960: 2941: 2906: 2813: 2785: 2737: 2301: 2258: 2121: 2104: 2011: 2003: 1989: 1767: 1728: 1673: 1661: 1654: 1187: 594: 582: 554: 465: 3810: 3137: 3000: 2356: 1216:

you can open up a text input bar that will highlight all the instances of what you put in the that bar.

913: 508: 338: 321: 3306: 3258: 3229: 2116:

You wrote the following on my talk page; I'm moving it here to keep the conversation in one place. --

1505: 1166:

There are also barnstars and other awards for diligence such as the Tireless Contributor barnstar. --

403: 4065: 4047: 1746: 1720: 1684: 1041: 784:? I have never heard Pax Americana used to describe a new world order. So it can't be popular to me. 729: 653: 265: 3345:

say, and specifically are not fair to all points of view. To be otherwise would, for example, give

767:, which had appeared in the post-World War II period, was used as a nickname for the post-Cold War 4074: 2860: 1152: 388:

that lacks references. If you don't want Jean-Baptiste Bernard de la Harpe to be deleted, please

3948: 3919: 3821: 3734: 3552: 3402: 3321: 3287: 3244: 3157: 3011: 2868: 2824: 2795: 2767: 2748: 2732:

chance to respond on the talk page. This certainly subverts the intention of that warning tag.

2688: 2672: 2614: 2561: 2283: 2228: 2051: 1923: 1908: 1862: 1834: 1701: 1629: 1615: 1590: 1576: 1522: 1509: 1501: 1465: 1366: 1343: 1339: 1325: 1302: 1280: 1264: 1231: 1167: 433: 419: 3606: 3475: 3349: 2747:

TB "went ahead" after waiting 4 days, with no responses. That's totally reasonable behavior. --

1798: 1263:

you changed technical language, rendering it wrong and nonsensical. Don't do that! Thanks. --

1124: 613: 2179:

Don't you notice how non-neutral the red example is and how encyclopedic the green example is?

1416:

was removed because it seemed like promotional material, having pufferous or positive loading.

1219:

I wasn't sure if I should've used BC or BCE. But then by the year 7000 we would have to change

543:

would be pointless since first and earliest mean the same thing. So it would be okay to revert.

524:

That would be crazy. The statement on the article would be outdated about 5,000 years from now.

380:

Hello, Turkeybutt JC. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,

3586: 3037: 2081:

For starters, "I don't have time for an edit summary" is not acceptable. Don't do that again.

1102: 550: 287: 4086: 3841: 3471: 3141: 3129: 2763: 2610: 2361: 2208: 2136: 1900: 1693: 1421: 4036: 3869: 3793: 3757: 3711: 3701: 3649: 3449: 3387: 3210:, under the edit summary " Making the article more NPOV", one of your edits was to replace " 3177: 3098: 3088: 2983: 2956: 2937: 2809: 2781: 2733: 2638: 2297: 2254: 2117: 2100: 2007: 1985: 1830: 1814: 1758: 1724: 1669: 1209:

really necessary? I don't think so. But that doesn't matter in terms of guideline-following.

1183: 638: 461: 4089:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4082: 4014: 4013:

can be done quickly by any admin without needing consensus; just like unblocking, there is

4010: 3346: 3153: 3145: 3125: 2952: 2864: 2575: 2223: 2211: 1858: 1855: 1763: 1754: 1251: 3118: 3057: 2657: 2599: 2544: 432:

Oops. It turns out there already is an article of him. And I was mistaken- nevermind... --

80: 4026: 3342: 3133: 2631:

among editors to support the change. You can't just make the same change over and over. —

3485: 3633: 2914: 2500: 1142: 1134: 980: 878: 598: 586: 3305:

in that construction means a non-regular or dedicated trip and is not a superlative.--

3207: 2668: 2627:

Then you should explain that position at the article's talk page and work to build a

2520: 2215:

bias get to the best of us as editors when trying to contribute to Knowledge (XXG).

941: 933: 882: 764: 753: 450: 1091:

sounds like puffery. What is well-known to one is also not so well-known to another.

255:

button, on the tool bar above Knowledge (XXG)'s text editing window, also does this.

3963: 2268: 2186: 2162: 1753:

be puffery. It is not policy. Please keep in mind that we do have a policy called

1396:

is puffery and thus should only be mentioned within a quote made by a cited source.

1029: 1024: 1007: 1002: 805: 798: 678: 4056: 3786: 2976: 847:

Muslims have long been important to the existence of the United States of America.

63: 2526:

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose

2274: 2197: 2173: 522:

Paleo-Indians migrated from Asia to the North American mainland around 12,985 BC.

4031: 2633: 2250:

editing slower, more carefully, in smaller chunks, and listening to other people

1496:

comprises the main building downtown and numerous branches throughout the city,

826: 711: 475:

I don't know if I help or hurt the encyclopedia, but here is why I edited what:

258:

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the

1614:. Either there should be a consensus or a guideline on what to use or where. -- 251: 4022: 3073:

for violating your topic ban. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

2652: 2594: 2539: 2084:

You are still mixing good changes and bad changes in one large edit. Stop it.

870: 3690:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2808:

I think that no one responded to your talk page comment was message enough.

2182:

I don't like the use of positive or negative bias in articles, such as this;

1936:

The original wording of one of the four sentences in this stub article about

4138: 4115: 4040: 3989: 3979: 3973: 3956: 3942: 3927: 3902: 3880: 3855: 3829: 3765: 3742: 3719: 3657: 3637: 3629: 3594: 3560: 3541: 3457: 3410: 3395: 3366: 3329: 3314: 3295: 3266: 3252: 3237: 3185: 3165: 3106: 3045: 3019: 2964: 2945: 2925:

do not appear to have the skills necessary to copy edit other people's work.

2918: 2910: 2895: 2876: 2832: 2817: 2803: 2789: 2775: 2756: 2741: 2696: 2680: 2662: 2651:. It has been vetted by the community. This kind of tagging is not helpful. 2642: 2622: 2604: 2569: 2549: 2305: 2291: 2262: 2125: 2108: 2059: 2015: 1999: 1993: 1937: 1931: 1916: 1870: 1842: 1775: 1732: 1709: 1677: 1637: 1623: 1598: 1584: 1530: 1473: 1374: 1351: 1333: 1310: 1288: 1272: 1239: 1191: 1175: 1108: 469: 441: 427: 411: 292: 3669: 3077:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2087:

You are arguing with people who know what they are talking about, when you

1403:

because what is major to one person may be minor to another and vice versa.

3386:

block expires you will be blocked indefinitely with no further warning. --

3283: 3279: 326: 62:

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to

3576: 3572: 2504: 682: 4093:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2491: 1628:

Thanks. I think we can agree to disagree about "is located in." Best,

1020: 998: 808:'s work of the 1910s established him as one of the first U.S. composers 245: 3628:. You can find the answer to your question here on your talk page. - 3257:

Ah. I see. Nothing I could say would possibly matter. Moving along.--

1459:

Is it the only one trusted by that governor? I could've put a there.

1207:

The U.S. and U.S.S.R. were involved in what is known as the Cold War.

801:'s work of the 1910s established him as the first major U.S. composer 1492:

You have neglected to respond to my comment about the sentence "The

825:

Americans have long been important in the modern artistic medium of

2045:? Or is it just bad because I'm making a stub article even shorter? 1011:(1941), which is frequently cited as the greatest film of all time, 849:

That sounds crazy. But then it would make sense if we realize that

3698:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 3085:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 874: 236: 3607:

Hey! You predicted the future! How did you know I would say that?

989:

because it wasn't cited. How do we know he was the top filmmaker?

2431: 2424: 2417: 2410: 2403: 2396: 2389: 490:

Paleo-Indians migrated from Asia to the North American mainland

479:

Paleo-Indians migrated from Asia to the North American mainland

4096:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2611:

I don't think Knowledge (XXG) should praise or demean anything.

2207:

to preserve the neutrality of the articles. You can criticize,

2035:

But what I'd like to to know is, which do you think is better;

3781: 2971: 2667:

I just questioned the seemingly non-neutral statements on the

2380: 395:

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on

349: 4025:. I think I've seen as many ban proposals fail as succeed at 1589:

Are you going to do any revision of your edit whatsoever? --

3668: 3194:

me". But most of the time when this happens it means, well,

3056: 2321: 1432:

Various private schools are located in Little Rock, such as:

1428:

The city is home to a variety of private schools, including:

225: 186: 115: 73: 3146:

you as a newcomer should not be lecturing experienced users

2724:

I noticed you made 5 edits in a row (3 were test edits) to

3282:

grammatical error was not intended. I meant for it to say

54:– I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the 3112:

Why are admins criticizing my NPOVist editing philosophy?

2039:

Kanapakur is known for its production of silk and granite

983:, American's top filmmaker during the silent film period, 661:... legendary, great, acclaimed, visionary, outstanding, 3579:. You will say that they are two quite different words. 3571:

You may find it interesting to compare the two articles

1203:

The U.S. and the U.S.S.R. were involved in the Cold War.

4077:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3798: 3644: 3625: 2988: 1976:

Your edit almost seems vexatious. This sentence really

1883: 1795:

Palo Alto, California is a center of high tech industry

1716: 1603: 1434:

because the latter sounds more formal and encyclopedic.

1363: 1321: 1260: 557:

fueled interest in both religion and religious liberty.

2158:

I try to make sure that articles that read like this:

506:

would be grammatically incorrect, but the point is at

3866:

I am pinging Floquenbeam to revoke talk page access:

1301:

button with the CTRL-F thing on my behalf. My bad. --

1066:... this country, here, there, somewhere, sometimes, 842:

as in "Americans have been important to photography"?

651:

is a peacock word. It is listed in the yellow box in

162:– a summary of Knowledge (XXG)'s most important rules 2907:

User talk:Floquenbeam#Problematic and a bit tiresome

1606:

But I fail to agree on you on whether we should use

134:– quick reference on Knowledge (XXG)'s mark-up codes 3805:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 3132:you can put that opinion in the article" or "those 2995:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 1907:

is another thing I am unhealthily obsessed with. --

1687:. There is a yellow box listing peacock words. And 1551:sounds like it might be used in a promotional way. 932:...were a vital component in what became known as " 3913:Should blocks require consensus from other admins? 3796:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 2986:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 907:still shouldn't be used or replaced with the word 838:of photography? What does the editor even mean by 727:also sounds like a pufferous statement. Also from 170:– a thorough step-by-step guide to Knowledge (XXG) 50:If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at 1545:is intended to make it more formal than informal. 834:How long have us Americans been important in the 714:to confront segregation and discrimination, with 2091:don't know what you are talking about. Stop it. 1949:"The old name of Kanakapura is Kaan-kaan halli". 899:would make it outdated. If people still call it 2132: 681:jockeyed for power during what is known as the 633:The United States played a leading role in the 298:Turkeybutt JC, you are invited to the Teahouse! 99:(a tutorial orienting you with Knowledge (XXG)) 3978:And your talk page access has been revoked by 2726:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Embedded lists 2719:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Embedded lists 2593:Italics are mine. I hope this makes it clear. 1967:"Kanakapura was named Kaan-kaan halli until ." 1666:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Words to watch 318:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge (XXG). 142:– an overview of Knowledge (XXG)'s foundations 39:I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to 2581: 1114:I'm against the use of subjective terms like 677:After World War II the United States and the 553:movement of the 1730s and 1740s known as the 239:(~~~~). This will automatically insert your " 8: 3964:If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging 2849:Why was my comment (that you reverted) here? 2385: 43:. As a first step, you may wish to read the 3797: 2987: 1078:four major broadcasters in the U.S. are the 718:becoming a prominent leader and figurehead. 4124: 3729:but you didn't say that I was going to be 2560:in it at the beginning and it doesn't. -- 2511:" and is usually seen as obstructing the 2318:Welcome to The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure! 2151:is an euphemism that should not be used. 1879:Magnolia677, that was a pointless revert. 1833:) But we can always correct eachother. -- 1453:The college was also the sole beneficiary 585:, helping them turn the tide against the 2347:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Start Page 2099:do these 3 things I know it won't be. -- 1831:the founder and owner of the site itself 1694:not assume that anything is good or bad. 1048:virtuoso, honorable, awesome, unique ... 243:" (your username and a date stamp). The 3601:that they are two quite different words 3341:No they do not. The reflect what those 520:12,985 BC is 15,000 years before 2016. 2905:You probably should be aware of this: 2853:Because you said that I as a newcomer 1749:is an essay to help people learn what 154:– a Wizard to help you create articles 3439:So, you are topic banned from making 3420:, and failing, in inappropriate ways. 3212:...made a special visit to the school 2556:the edit summary would have the word 2379:-- 18:38, Friday, September 2, 2016 ( 2193:I would want that to look like this: 2042: 2038: 1998:Then look at the edit I just made to 1856:refrain from making personal attacks. 1812: 1794: 1452: 1444:sounds more neutral and encyclopedic. 1431: 1427: 1413: 1224: 1220: 1206: 1202: 1140: 1132: 1099: 1084: 1077: 1014: 992: 978: 940:...contributed to what is nicknamed " 939: 931: 868: 850: 846: 824: 804: 796: 762: 751: 705: 676: 632: 592: 580: 548: 529: 489: 478: 7: 4131:2601:381:101:142:504A:71CF:709E:FBFD 4066:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 4063:Hello, Turkeybutt JC. Voting in the 2352:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Lounge 1696:You can learn more about puffery at 1033:(1941), which has topped other lists 985:I was considering removing the word 567:mean? It wouldn't seem to matter if 4079:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3888:;) but great minds think alike eh. 3846:Knowledge (XXG):Alternative outlets 2794:How do I start a consensus then? -- 2480:Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge 2474:About The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 2043:Kanakapur produces silk and granite 1982:Knowledge (XXG):Responsible tagging 209:– Knowledge (XXG)'s hub of activity 126:– a guide on where to ask questions 64:the world's largest encyclopedia... 3622:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Good articles 2357:The Teahouse new editor help space 881:were adopted and transformed into 418:an edit conflict. I'm so naïve. -- 14: 3582:The editor who uses the pseudonym 3033:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1813:Speaking in the tone you used to 1555:sounds more neutral and accurate. 1297:I think that was a misuse of the 944:" or the "Hollywood Renaissance", 936:" or the "Hollywood Renaissance", 797:Though little known at the time, 382:Jean-Baptiste Bernard de la Harpe 375:Jean-Baptiste Bernard de la Harpe 4055: 3785: 3643:The only reason I didn't remove 2975: 2503:other editors' contributions at 2490: 2235:) 17:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1886:makes no sense to me. The words 1719:. Please take a moment to read 1137:, popularly known as the Oscars, 1112:, to name two of the best-known. 778:gained wide popularity as a term 305: 250: 244: 3620:I have removed your comment at 1494:Central Arkansas Library System 964:to demonstrate that importance. 955:making unprovable proclamations 891:What if people stop calling it 745:to demonstrate that importance. 739:making unprovable proclamations 194:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG) 4041:13:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3990:13:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3974:13:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3957:13:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3943:13:11, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3928:13:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3903:13:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3881:13:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3856:13:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3830:12:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3766:02:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3743:02:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3720:01:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3658:01:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 2780:No response isn't consensus. 2499:. You appear to be repeatedly 1440:sounds like positive loading. 1015:Various films have topped the 958:about a subject's importance, 741:about a subject's importance, 384:, for deletion because it's a 1: 4116:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 3638:16:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3595:13:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3561:15:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 3542:15:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 3486:15:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 3458:13:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3411:10:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3396:00:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC) 3367:12:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3330:12:38, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3315:12:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3296:10:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3267:00:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC) 3253:23:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3238:23:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3186:22:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3166:22:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3107:22:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3069:from editing for a period of 3046:13:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3020:12:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 2965:19:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 2946:14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 2919:11:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC) 2896:10:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 2877:14:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2833:14:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 2818:00:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 2804:22:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2790:21:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2776:14:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2757:14:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2742:13:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2697:02:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2681:01:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2663:01:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2643:00:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2623:00:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2605:00:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 2570:23:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2550:21:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2306:19:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2292:19:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2263:19:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2126:19:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2109:13:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2060:12:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 2016:04:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1994:03:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1932:02:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1917:01:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1871:11:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1843:00:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1776:20:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 1733:20:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 1710:20:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 1638:22:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 1352:02:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC) 1334:21:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 1100:for example, New York City's 231:Please sign your messages on 197:– a guide on how you can help 96:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 3686:from editing for persistent 2006:gave you some good advice. 776:What's wrong with replacing 386:biography of a living person 336: 4100:and submit your choices on 3809:, or consider visiting the 2999:, or consider visiting the 2586:whether in whole or in part 2267:You said a bad word there; 2246:As the worst editor ever... 1905:WP:Verifiability, not truth 1678:23:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1624:22:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1599:22:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1585:22:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1531:21:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1474:21:18, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1375:12:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1311:23:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1289:23:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1273:23:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1240:16:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 1192:02:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 1176:23:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 470:20:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 458:Make a few edits at at time 442:01:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 428:01:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 412:12:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC) 360:16:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 293:22:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC) 139:Knowledge (XXG)'s 5 pillars 56:New contributors' help page 35:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! 25:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! 4156: 4108:MediaWiki message delivery 4098:the candidates' statements 2536:loss of editing privileges 2497:welcome to Knowledge (XXG) 2452:The Veil of Verifiability 2449:The Neutral Point of View 2446:Small Changes, Big Impact 2362:Knowledge (XXG) Help pages 1212:Here's a trick. If you do 993:Notable films topping the 597:, aiding them against the 344:We hope to see you there! 303: 22:Hello, Turkeybutt JC, and 3696:guide to appealing blocks 3466:Help on Jimbo's talk page 3465: 3216:...visited to the school. 3083:guide to appealing blocks 3075:make useful contributions 1085:Well-known newspapers are 1070:occasionally, somehow ... 961:use facts and attribution 743:use facts and attribution 4139:10:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC) 3952: 3923: 3848:for some other options. 3825: 3738: 3648:up below in a minute. -- 3406: 3381:Revoked talk page access 3325: 3291: 3248: 3161: 3144:are in the sources" or " 3015: 2872: 2799: 2771: 2692: 2676: 2618: 2565: 2287: 2055: 1912: 1866: 1838: 1705: 1619: 1580: 1469: 1394:internationally renowned 1388:Place is located in City 1306: 1235: 1171: 950:As I already mentioned, 691:I don't think the words 593:...alongside the formal 581:...alongside the formal 437: 423: 283:good luck, and have fun. 167:Guide to Knowledge (XXG) 69:Finding your way around: 3567:Materiel & material 2443:An Invitation to Earth 2440:Say Hello to the World 2169:become more like this: 1958:You changed it to read: 1017:American Film Institute 995:American Film Institute 977:I also fixed a typo in 3673: 3624:. The reason is in my 3498:Actually, Turkeybutt, 3061: 2590: 2513:normal editing process 2458:Looking Good Together 2326: 2238: 1859:Don't bite the newbies 885:with global audiences. 836:modern artistic medium 782:was used as a nickname 716:Martin Luther King Jr. 159:The simplified ruleset 4075:Arbitration Committee 4048:ArbCom Elections 2016 3706:Your reason here ~~~~ 3694:by first reading the 3672: 3280:visited to the school 3093:Your reason here ~~~~ 3081:by first reading the 3060: 2867:| #NoobLivesMatter -- 2578:you will see written: 2325: 2004:User:John from Idegon 1662:Little Rock, Arkansas 1655:Little Rock, Arkansas 1384:City is home to Place 708:civil rights movement 595:Allies of World War I 583:Allies of World War I 3800:ask another question 2990:ask another question 2588:—counts as a revert. 2501:reverting or undoing 1660:In a recent edit of 1442:Consists of at least 1250:The first phrase of 1246:WP:W2W and relatives 1158:sounds more neutral. 970:what became known as 818:first U.S. composer? 700:Removal of the word 627:Removal of the word 551:Christian revivalist 539:being replaced with 85:Department directory 3134:first/second person 2888:Boing! said Zebedee 1386:seems too clichéd. 1197:Oops. But is using 1145:, nicknamed Oscars, 1056:isn't recommended. 911:. Listed on box at 877:and what is called 873:idioms such as the 845:Okay, here's this; 4091:arbitration policy 4050:: Voting now open! 3688:disruptive editing 3674: 3530:Exactly. Also, as 3284:visited the school 3062: 2528:editing privileges 2455:The Civility Code 2327: 2273:You could've said 1149:popularly known as 857:It would be crazy. 571:was replaced with 339:Visit the Teahouse 221:Additional tips... 4141: 4129:comment added by 3984:ThePlatypusofDoom 3968:ThePlatypusofDoom 3937:ThePlatypusofDoom 3875:ThePlatypusofDoom 3850:ThePlatypusofDoom 3817: 3816: 3802:on your talk page 3692:appeal this block 3616:Removed a comment 3611: 3610: 3609: 3584: 3551:of attention. -- 3536:ThePlatypusofDoom 3497: 3494:talk page watcher 3480:ThePlatypusofDoom 3340: 3337:talk page watcher 3079:appeal this block 3035: 3007: 3006: 2992:on your talk page 2532:three-revert rule 2462: 2461: 2339:Hi Turkeybutt JC! 2129: 1875: 1764:assume good faith 1537:The replacing of 1399:Removed the word 1103:The Village Voice 392:to the article. 371:Proposed deletion 367: 366: 361: 357: 353:on behalf of the 278: 277: 217: 216: 182:How you can help: 178: 177: 107: 106: 81:Table of contents 4147: 4059: 3873: 3804: 3789: 3782: 3709: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3580: 3491: 3343:reliable sources 3334: 3285: 3281: 3148:" or "these are 3122: 3096: 3031: 2994: 2979: 2972: 2660: 2655: 2602: 2597: 2547: 2542: 2494: 2481: 2475: 2434: 2427: 2420: 2413: 2406: 2399: 2392: 2386: 2324: 2276: 2270: 2224:#NoobLivesMatter 2199: 2189: 2175: 2165: 2114: 2044: 2040: 1890:is unnecessary. 1873: 1819: 1796: 1768:John from Idegon 1755:Ignore all rules 1558:The removing of 1454: 1433: 1429: 1415: 1358:Sole beneficiary 1226: 1225:20,000 years ago 1222: 1221:15,000 years ago 1215: 1208: 1204: 1199:what is known as 1146: 1138: 1113: 1106:or Los Angeles' 1086: 1079: 1062:lists a synonym; 1034: 1012: 984: 962: 956: 945: 937: 886: 855: 848: 829: 809: 802: 771: 769:new world order. 760: 758:new world order. 744: 740: 719: 693:what is known as 686: 674:what is known as 642: 602: 590: 558: 531: 523: 498: 487: 359: 352: 346: 341: 329: 327:Worm That Turned 320:Be our guest at 309: 302: 301: 290: 254: 248: 226: 206:Community portal 187: 116: 74: 28: 26: 4155: 4154: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4120: 4119: 4103:the voting page 4060: 4052: 4015:deletion review 4011:Speedy deletion 3915: 3894: 3867: 3777: 3725:You said I was 3722: 3699: 3666: 3618: 3569: 3516: 3468: 3383: 3358: 3347:fringe theories 3307:Fuhghettaboutit 3259:Fuhghettaboutit 3230:Fuhghettaboutit 3217: 3213: 3116: 3114: 3109: 3086: 3054: 2903: 2884: 2851: 2722: 2658: 2653: 2600: 2595: 2545: 2540: 2488: 2483: 2479: 2473: 2470: 2432: 2425: 2418: 2411: 2404: 2397: 2390: 2322: 2320: 2237: 2089:self-admittedly 2074: 1881: 1723:. Thank you. 1658: 1360: 1248: 1213: 1069: 1047: 963: 960: 957: 954: 925:soon, since ... 924: 763:The concept of 752:The concept of 742: 738: 664: 555:Great Awakening 521: 454: 404:Celestinesucess 390:add a reference 378: 363: 362: 348: 342: 337: 325: 300: 295: 288: 281:Turkeybutt JC, 279: 218: 179: 108: 29: 24: 21: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4153: 4151: 4143: 4142: 4061: 4054: 4053: 4051: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4019:banning policy 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3890: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3815: 3814: 3807:user talk page 3790: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3675:You have been 3667: 3665: 3664:September 2016 3662: 3661: 3660: 3617: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3568: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3525: 3524: 3512: 3467: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3354: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3215: 3211: 3142:POV statements 3113: 3110: 3063:You have been 3055: 3053: 3052:September 2016 3050: 3049: 3048: 3005: 3004: 2997:user talk page 2980: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2902: 2899: 2883: 2880: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2721: 2717:Bold edits to 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2591: 2579: 2487: 2486:September 2016 2484: 2471: 2469: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2450: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2429: 2422: 2415: 2408: 2401: 2394: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2349: 2319: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2280: 2277: 2271: 2201: 2200: 2191: 2190: 2177: 2176: 2167: 2166: 2133: 2131: 2130: 2093: 2092: 2085: 2082: 2073: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2033: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1880: 1877: 1874:forgot to sign 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1698:WP:WIKIPUFFERY 1657: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1556: 1546: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1490: 1486: 1483: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1445: 1435: 1425: 1411: 1404: 1397: 1391: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1318: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1292: 1291: 1247: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1228: 1217: 1210: 1179: 1178: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1151:sounds like a 1143:Academy Awards 1135:Academy Awards 1129: 1128: 1120: 1119: 1092: 1081: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1050: 1045: 1036: 1035: 1023:list, such as 990: 981:D. W. Griffith 974: 973: 966: 959: 953: 947: 946: 928: 927: 922: 918: 888: 887: 883:popular genres 879:old-time music 869:Elements from 860: 859: 843: 831: 830: 820: 819: 811: 810: 793: 792: 785: 773: 772: 748: 747: 734: 721: 720: 697: 696: 688: 687: 669: 668: 662: 658: 644: 643: 641:conferences... 624: 623: 618: 604: 603: 599:Central Powers 587:Central Powers 577: 576: 560: 559: 545: 544: 533: 532: 526: 525: 518: 513: 500: 499: 453: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 377: 368: 365: 364: 355:Teahouse hosts 343: 319: 312: 310: 299: 296: 276: 275: 272: 271: 256: 224: 215: 214: 211: 210: 200: 199: 198: 185: 176: 175: 172: 171: 163: 155: 151:Article wizard 145: 144: 143: 135: 127: 114: 105: 104: 101: 100: 90: 89: 88: 72: 60: 30: 20: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4152: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4122: 4121: 4118: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4104: 4099: 4094: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4058: 4049: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4033: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4009:a consensus. 4008: 4003: 4002: 3991: 3988: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3972: 3969: 3965: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3941: 3938: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3912: 3904: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3895: 3893: 3887: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3879: 3876: 3871: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3857: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3840: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3812: 3808: 3803: 3801: 3795: 3791: 3788: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3773: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3723: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3707: 3703: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3671: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3615: 3608: 3602: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3583: 3578: 3574: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3549: 3548: 3543: 3540: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3515: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3495: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3484: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3419: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3380: 3368: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3357: 3351: 3348: 3344: 3338: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3277: 3274: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3226: 3221: 3209: 3208:Louis Braille 3205: 3204: 3203: 3199: 3197: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3138:instructional 3135: 3131: 3127: 3120: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3094: 3090: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3067: 3059: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3034: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3002: 2998: 2993: 2991: 2985: 2981: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2900: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2856: 2848: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2729: 2727: 2720: 2716: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2656: 2650: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2603: 2598: 2592: 2589: 2587: 2580: 2577: 2574:If you click 2573: 2572: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2548: 2543: 2538:. Thank you. 2537: 2533: 2529: 2524: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2493: 2485: 2482: 2476: 2468: 2467: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2430: 2428: 2423: 2421: 2416: 2414: 2409: 2407: 2402: 2400: 2395: 2393: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2317: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2272: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2204: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2180: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2071: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1884:This revision 1878: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1800: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1656: 1653: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612:is located in 1609: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1553:is located in 1550: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1458: 1457:one and only. 1450: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340:Turkeybutt JC 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1218: 1211: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1157: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1105: 1104: 1097: 1093: 1090: 1082: 1076:Omission of 1075: 1074: 1071: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1055: 1051: 1049: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1010: 1009: 1004: 1001:list include 1000: 996: 991: 988: 982: 976: 975: 971: 967: 965: 949: 948: 943: 942:New Hollywood 935: 934:New Hollywood 930: 929: 926: 919: 916: 915: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 884: 880: 876: 872: 866: 862: 861: 858: 854: 844: 841: 837: 833: 832: 828: 823:Ommission of 822: 821: 817: 813: 812: 807: 800: 795: 794: 789: 786: 783: 779: 775: 774: 770: 766: 765:Pax Americana 759: 755: 754:Pax Americana 750: 749: 746: 735: 733: 731: 726: 723: 722: 717: 713: 709: 703: 699: 698: 694: 690: 689: 684: 680: 675: 671: 670: 667: 659: 656: 655: 650: 646: 645: 640: 636: 635:Bretton Woods 630: 626: 625: 622: 619: 616: 615: 610: 609:turn the tide 607:It's because 606: 605: 600: 596: 588: 584: 579: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 561: 556: 552: 547: 546: 542: 538: 535: 534: 528: 527: 519: 517: 514: 512: 510: 505: 502: 501: 497: 493: 486: 482: 477: 476: 474: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 459: 452: 451:United States 449: 443: 439: 435: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 400: 398: 393: 391: 387: 383: 376: 372: 369: 358: 356: 351: 347:Delivered by 340: 335: 333: 328: 323: 317: 316:Turkeybutt JC 311: 308: 304: 297: 294: 291: 289:CAPTAIN RAJU 285: 284: 274: 269: 268: 267: 261: 257: 253: 247: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 223: 222: 213: 208: 207: 203: 202: 201: 196: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 183: 174: 169: 168: 164: 161: 160: 156: 153: 152: 148: 147: 146: 141: 140: 136: 133: 132: 128: 125: 124: 120: 119: 118: 117: 113: 112: 103: 98: 97: 93: 92: 91: 87: 86: 82: 78: 77: 76: 75: 71: 70: 66: 65: 59: 57: 53: 48: 46: 42: 38: 37: 36: 27: 16: 4125:— Preceding 4101: 4095: 4072: 4064: 4062: 4030: 4006: 3916: 3897: 3896: 3891: 3838: 3818: 3799: 3794:help request 3778: 3752: 3730: 3727:topic banned 3726: 3705: 3683:indefinitely 3681: 3676: 3626:edit summary 3619: 3600: 3587:JamesBWatson 3581: 3570: 3519: 3518: 3513: 3507: 3503: 3469: 3444: 3440: 3417: 3384: 3361: 3360: 3355: 3350:undue weight 3302: 3275: 3219: 3200: 3195: 3192: 3173: 3115: 3092: 3070: 3064: 3038:JamesBWatson 3032: 3027: 3008: 2989: 2984:help request 2904: 2901:Notification 2885: 2882:Fake unblock 2859: 2855:sounded dumb 2854: 2852: 2730: 2723: 2649:Good article 2632: 2585: 2582: 2557: 2525: 2509:edit warring 2489: 2465: 2378: 2338: 2249: 2245: 2232: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2205: 2202: 2192: 2181: 2178: 2168: 2157: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2134: 2115: 2096: 2094: 2088: 2075: 1977: 1896:is known for 1895: 1892:the old name 1891: 1888:is known for 1887: 1882: 1853: 1799:undue weight 1750: 1688: 1659: 1611: 1607: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1548: 1542: 1538: 1514:Wrightsville 1498:Jacksonville 1489:alternative. 1456: 1448: 1441: 1437: 1430:changed to 1418:cutting-edge 1417: 1407: 1400: 1393: 1387: 1383: 1361: 1317: 1298: 1256: 1249: 1198: 1180: 1155: 1153:weasel word. 1148: 1125:undue weight 1115: 1107: 1101: 1095: 1088: 1083:Omission of 1065: 1059:WP:WHATPLACE 1057: 1053: 1040: 1030:Citizen Kane 1028: 1025:Orson Welles 1008:Citizen Kane 1006: 1003:Orson Welles 986: 969: 951: 920: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 864: 856: 853: 839: 835: 815: 806:Charles Ives 799:Charles Ives 787: 781: 777: 736: 728: 724: 701: 692: 679:Soviet Union 673: 660: 652: 648: 628: 620: 612: 608: 572: 568: 564: 540: 536: 515: 507: 503: 495: 491: 484: 480: 457: 455: 401: 397:my talk page 394: 379: 345: 322:the Teahouse 315: 313: 282: 280: 273: 264: 263: 220: 219: 212: 204: 192: 181: 180: 173: 165: 157: 149: 137: 129: 121: 110: 109: 102: 94: 79: 68: 67: 61: 52:my talk page 49: 45:Introduction 33: 32: 31: 3886:Aready done 3870:Floquenbeam 3758:Floquenbeam 3712:Floquenbeam 3650:Floquenbeam 3450:Floquenbeam 3388:Floquenbeam 3178:Floquenbeam 3126:incompetent 3099:Floquenbeam 2957:Floquenbeam 2938:Floquenbeam 2810:Magnolia677 2782:Magnolia677 2766:in tone. -- 2734:Magnolia677 2495:Hello, and 2298:Floquenbeam 2255:Floquenbeam 2118:Floquenbeam 2101:Floquenbeam 2008:Magnolia677 1986:Magnolia677 1815:Magnolia677 1759:Magnolia677 1725:Magnolia677 1670:Magnolia677 1604:I just did. 1568:Little Rock 1447:Removal of 1438:boasts over 1408:specialized 1299:Replace All 1184:Floquenbeam 1094:Removal of 952:Instead of 914:WP:REALTIME 903:, the word 863:Removal of 827:photography 737:Instead of 712:nonviolence 672:Removal of 509:WP:REALTIME 462:Floquenbeam 270:is for you. 4087:topic bans 4023:global ban 3949:Turkeybutt 3920:Turkeybutt 3822:Turkeybutt 3735:Turkeybutt 3403:Turkeybutt 3322:Turkeybutt 3288:Turkeybutt 3245:Turkeybutt 3220:particular 3158:Turkeybutt 3150:well-known 3012:Turkeybutt 2869:Turkeybutt 2796:Turkeybutt 2768:Turkeybutt 2689:Turkeybutt 2673:Turkeybutt 2669:talk page. 2615:Turkeybutt 2562:Turkeybutt 2284:Turkeybutt 2229:Turkeybutt 2052:Turkeybutt 1909:Turkeybutt 1863:Turkeybutt 1835:Turkeybutt 1801:on things. 1747:WP:PUFFERY 1721:WP:ESDONTS 1702:Turkeybutt 1689:well-known 1685:WP:PUFFERY 1616:Turkeybutt 1608:is home to 1577:Turkeybutt 1560:as well as 1549:is home to 1506:Perryville 1466:Turkeybutt 1406:What does 1303:Turkeybutt 1232:Turkeybutt 1168:Turkeybutt 1147:, because 1116:best-known 1096:best-known 1089:well-known 1054:Frequently 1042:WP:PUFFERY 968:What does 730:WP:PUFFERY 706:A growing 654:WP:PUFFERY 563:What does 434:Turkeybutt 420:Turkeybutt 235:with four 233:talk pages 131:Cheatsheet 111:Need help? 4083:site bans 3448:block. -- 3443:edits to 3228:regards-- 3214:", with " 3174:you think 3154:attacking 2861:WP:AGEISM 2629:consensus 2521:talk page 2517:consensus 2433:Mission 7 2426:Mission 6 2419:Mission 5 2412:Mission 4 2405:Mission 3 2398:Mission 2 2391:Mission 1 2188:Wal-Mart. 2149:Pass away 2141:pass away 2000:Kanakapur 1938:Kanakapur 1570:though... 1382:The term 1205:so it is 1156:Nicknamed 1109:LA Weekly 979:Director 840:important 725:Prominent 702:prominent 647:The word 485:years ago 260:mainspace 241:signature 123:Questions 4127:unsigned 3811:Teahouse 3704:|reason= 3577:Material 3573:Materiel 3508:two days 3500:Platypus 3476:WP:WALLS 3196:it's you 3091:|reason= 3071:31 hours 3001:Teahouse 2584:actions— 2558:reverted 2505:Napoleon 2466:Get Help 2097:at least 1564:the city 1539:includes 1510:Sherwood 1502:Maumelle 1322:this one 1261:this one 1214:CTRL + F 1087:because 1046:notable, 901:old-time 893:old-time 683:Cold War 663:leading, 614:WP:IDIOM 569:known as 565:known as 541:earliest 504:in about 492:in about 481:at least 402:Thanks, 4007:require 3892:Muffled 3775:with... 3749:WT:NPOV 3731:blocked 3702:unblock 3678:blocked 3532:Fortuna 3514:Muffled 3472:WP:TLDR 3356:Muffled 3303:Special 3089:unblock 3066:blocked 2764:neutral 2519:on the 2137:WP:NPOV 2072:Clarity 1901:WP:NPOV 1854:Please 1543:such as 1422:WP:NPOV 1021:AFI 100 999:AFI 100 895:, then 788:Popular 649:leading 629:leading 617:states; 494:15,000 483:15,000 350:HostBot 266:Sandbox 17:Welcome 4032:C.Fred 3987:(talk) 3971:(talk) 3940:(talk) 3878:(talk) 3853:(talk) 3844:? See 3539:(talk) 3504:really 3483:(talk) 3418:trying 3119:helpme 2953:WP:ANI 2865:WP:DNB 2634:C.Fred 2576:WP:3RR 2212:attack 1978:really 1252:WP:W2W 1068:often, 573:called 262:, the 237:tildes 4123:No. 4027:WP:AN 3792:This 3130:cited 2982:This 2209:bite, 2143:with 1940:read: 1818:here. 1541:with 1451:from 1401:major 1098:from 1039:From 972:mean? 909:still 875:blues 867:from 816:first 780:with 710:used 704:from 639:Yalta 631:from 537:First 4135:talk 4112:talk 4073:The 4037:talk 3980:Nick 3953:talk 3924:talk 3842:NPOV 3839:read 3826:talk 3762:talk 3739:talk 3733:. -- 3716:talk 3654:talk 3645:this 3634:talk 3630:DVdm 3591:talk 3575:and 3557:talk 3474:and 3454:talk 3407:talk 3392:talk 3326:talk 3311:talk 3292:talk 3278:The 3263:talk 3249:talk 3234:talk 3182:talk 3162:talk 3140:and 3103:talk 3042:talk 3016:talk 2961:talk 2942:talk 2915:talk 2911:DVdm 2909:. - 2892:talk 2873:talk 2829:talk 2814:talk 2800:talk 2786:talk 2772:talk 2753:talk 2738:talk 2693:talk 2677:talk 2639:talk 2619:talk 2566:talk 2302:talk 2288:talk 2259:talk 2233:talk 2122:talk 2105:talk 2056:talk 2012:talk 1990:talk 1928:talk 1913:talk 1867:talk 1861:. -- 1839:talk 1772:talk 1729:talk 1717:here 1706:talk 1700:. -- 1683:See 1674:talk 1634:talk 1620:talk 1595:talk 1581:talk 1527:talk 1512:and 1470:talk 1449:sole 1371:talk 1348:talk 1330:talk 1307:talk 1285:talk 1269:talk 1236:talk 1188:talk 1172:talk 1141:The 1133:The 923:now, 871:folk 791:you. 637:and 549:The 466:talk 438:talk 424:talk 408:talk 332:talk 41:stay 3753:one 3710:. 3589:" ( 3553:JBL 3445:any 3441:any 3276:PS. 3206:In 3097:. 3040:" ( 3028:you 2825:JBL 2749:JBL 2654:Dr. 2596:Dr. 2541:Dr. 2381:UTC 2153:Die 2145:die 2041:or 1984:. 1924:JBL 1751:may 1630:JBL 1610:or 1591:JBL 1566:to 1523:JBL 1367:JBL 1362:Re 1344:JBL 1326:JBL 1281:JBL 1265:JBL 1257:are 1223:to 1201:in 1139:to 1027:'s 1019:'s 1013:to 1005:'s 997:'s 987:top 938:to 905:now 897:now 865:now 803:to 761:to 666:... 591:to 496:BCE 488:to 399:. 373:of 334:). 314:Hi 249:or 4137:) 4114:) 4106:. 4085:, 4039:) 3982:. 3966:. 3955:) 3926:) 3828:) 3764:) 3756:-- 3741:) 3718:) 3708:}} 3700:{{ 3656:) 3636:) 3593:) 3559:) 3478:. 3456:) 3409:) 3394:) 3328:) 3313:) 3294:) 3265:) 3251:) 3236:) 3184:) 3164:) 3136:, 3121:}} 3117:{{ 3105:) 3095:}} 3087:{{ 3044:) 3018:) 3010:-- 2963:) 2944:) 2917:) 2894:) 2875:) 2863:| 2831:) 2823:-- 2816:) 2802:) 2788:) 2774:) 2755:) 2740:) 2728:. 2695:) 2679:) 2671:-- 2659:K. 2641:) 2621:) 2613:-- 2601:K. 2568:) 2546:K. 2523:. 2477:| 2383:) 2304:) 2290:) 2282:-- 2261:) 2253:-- 2244:(" 2227:-- 2147:. 2124:) 2107:) 2058:) 2050:-- 2014:) 2002:. 1992:) 1930:) 1915:) 1903:. 1869:) 1841:) 1774:) 1731:) 1708:) 1676:) 1636:) 1622:) 1597:) 1583:) 1575:-- 1529:) 1521:-- 1508:, 1504:, 1500:, 1472:) 1464:-- 1373:) 1350:) 1332:) 1309:) 1287:) 1271:) 1238:) 1230:-- 1190:) 1174:) 468:) 440:) 426:) 410:) 286:– 83:/ 58:. 47:. 4133:( 4110:( 4035:( 3951:( 3922:( 3872:: 3868:@ 3824:( 3813:. 3760:( 3737:( 3714:( 3652:( 3632:( 3585:" 3555:( 3496:) 3492:( 3452:( 3405:( 3390:( 3339:) 3335:( 3324:( 3309:( 3290:( 3261:( 3247:( 3232:( 3180:( 3160:( 3101:( 3036:" 3014:( 3003:. 2959:( 2940:( 2913:( 2890:( 2871:( 2827:( 2812:( 2798:( 2784:( 2770:( 2751:( 2736:( 2691:( 2675:( 2637:( 2617:( 2564:( 2300:( 2286:( 2257:( 2231:( 2120:( 2103:( 2054:( 2010:( 1988:( 1926:( 1911:( 1865:( 1837:( 1770:( 1727:( 1704:( 1672:( 1632:( 1618:( 1593:( 1579:( 1525:( 1468:( 1424:. 1369:( 1346:( 1328:( 1305:( 1283:( 1267:( 1234:( 1227:. 1186:( 1170:( 1118:. 917:; 732:; 685:, 657:. 601:. 589:. 511:; 464:( 436:( 422:( 406:( 330:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index