User talk:Ugog Nizdast/Archive 3

200:

India and Kerala by the Westerners - naturally by western missionaries. This is a well established plain fact and no sane person will deny it. If you think something cannot be included for lack of citation you are in effect promoting lies which has the support of cited lies.The page is full of errors and you keep it as they have the backing of citations of lies.It's a joke and mockery of facts. There's no other way modern education or English education was brought to India during the British rule in India. Talking about education without mentioning the introduction of it is non sense and the post miss it.May be purposely avoided it by some one with vested interests, The education mentioned by the previous author is not at all education in the modern sense.You cannot call it education in the modern sense as it was religious training given strictly for the upper class.

1214:. But you still seem to be name-calling people who don't agree with you in other areas, please stop that. I'm sure every editor must have told you this by now, wherever you've posted your query. Since you have been away for months over here, you have missed the drama which unfolded on his article because of his coverage in the media. Long story short: like all Indian articles his was of poor quality and his controversies in the media spiked a sudden interest in editing (where many disruptive new users were blocked), within no time quite a significant part of the community (even 3127: 2692: 2376: 109: 31: 2752: 1514:), doesn't comment on why the content was removed though a source had been cited for the information by me and can be very easily verified. I have provided the links to two of the many edits made by the IP editor on the article. Can this user be blocked? Am I within my wiki rights to that? The IP editor has been disregarding sources. Is this enough to be reported as vandalism? Please advice. 1388: 2428: 2806:. I removed a joke that someone added to the page: listing "has a mullet" as one of his abilities. Having a mullet is not one of his abilities--some people just seem to think this is funny because the mullet is no longer in fashion. Please redo my change or I will perform it again, and please try to more thoroughly evaluate edits before you undo them in the future. Thanks. 279: 1178:

on Knowledge (XXG) page which is contributed by other members. I also noticed that in past, approx. 3 times you removed the data from this page by mentioning you did fixes, formatting etc... I appreciate whatever formatting you did but removing data without any grounds is not acceptable unless someone has solid grounds for it (it's not a matter of personal choice).

1155::- Your comment is not justified, you reverting the whole text matter. May I know what do you mean by "mass replacement of much-discussed" the truth remains truth even if it is written 10 months ago or a year ago, I and couple of other fellow members contributed to this page and made it accurate based on our research and deep knowledge about this topic. 1585:. IP addresses are shared by multiple people and constantly change but since this one has a long history of making the same edits, it's probably just a single person. Most likely you won't need to take the final step but if it does and you not sure how to proceed or have questions about using twinkle, you can ask me any time. Sincerely, 2570:

Don't get me wrong, I never said they were a problem because they were non-English. I've underlined my previous post to show what was exactly wrong with them, take a look. One cannot simply use Knowledge (XXG) itself as a source, if it's there in another article and has just the same references there

2554:

Hi, thank you for your reply, do you mean something that is non-english is not authentic or not scholarly ? And the song is from the ancient literature that was already an existing article in wiki, isn't that a strong reference. So what is wrong in quoting it ? I can merge it with other section. Also

1177:

This is true that one should be aware of Hindi language in order to understand all the facts and media reports which were provided, it might possible that Hindi is not your native language so I can understand that but unless you understand something completely you should not modify or remove anything

721:

Hi Ugog- I think there's been a mistake. Your message to me ( User talk:162.78.70.162 ) about posting to Manganese and StudentRND was puzzling, as I didn't do any of that. (I had to look up both of those things to see what they were!) Sorry for the confusion, but whomever posted on those pages wasn't

468:

are important points. Oh ok, I understand what you did with the sagharika ghose article. You merged the criticism to the relevant sections like ravi shankar interview.Hmm i guess you are right..Knowledge (XXG) has so many rules , and i guess it will take some time for me learn the ropes before diving

199:

Hi, What if there' nothing available for citation? Lies should be allowed to perpetuate under the Knowledge (XXG) banner? What I added is a very plain fact. Any educated can testify to it, not just anyone from Kerala or India. Modern education is the product of Western culture and it was brought to

3141:

You have completed three thorough, high-quality reviews, with an increasing level of independence. Because you have shown expertise with the GA criteria, I'm proud to graduate you to a fully-qualified GAN reviewer. If you have any specific questions with any future reviews, you can always ask me, or

2934:? I agree they need archiving as well a cleanup of those rubbish meaningless posts. I've done it...you can take a look. I've also enabled it for automatic archival (done by a bot), since they are really active topics and it's pretty much needed. Now no need to worry about archiving those two pages. - 2535:

The statement about its history would be a good addition but I really don't think an entire non-English script about a song is really relevant to the article. In any case, it is still poorly sourced and if there are good scholarly sources mentioning this then it needs to be provided first. Also, why

2215:

Hi, I just saw your edit to the Modi page, and while I can see the need for cleanup in that section, I think the merger was not justified. The 2002 riots and the Babri masjid demolition are distinct events, so shouldn't they deserve seperate sections? And if you feel the controversies section is too

375:

Hey...Good thing you've asked before editing, I was planning to reply on the article talk page, since currently there is hardly any activity there and no one would likely answer you. Moreover, your question is more guideline-related than something to do with the topic, you're better off asking those

1645:

When I click on the Twinkle option on the IP's page there is an option of TB and ARV. Since the reporting to adminstrators is done at a later stage, what should i do with TB option? It doesn't seem like it would warn me if any edits are made. It is just something to link different talk pages. Help!

1622:

Most welcome, wait...you've simply confused yourself, all that is unnecessary. Just go to preferences and enable Twinkle (that's what is written on its page right?) and then you'll get a 'TW' option at the top right corner of any page you visit (Next to the 'View history' and watchlist icon). Video

2922:

Thanks Green Giant for the reply. In case you're still not sure how to manually archive from the above links:- In short, all you need to do is copy the old discussions from the target page (Talk:Knowledge (XXG)) to create the new archive subpage (Talk:Knowledge (XXG)/Archive N, where N= 1,2,3...),

1580:

In your case, once you enable twinkle, when the IP repeats this, send him a level one warning for adding unsourced content. This usually gets them to start communicating with you if they mean well. No response, and if it still continues, increase the level of warnings and if at all it doesn't stop

1325:

I'm working on improving/re-writing the Yale World Fellows Program page you've been involved with editing lately. I've got a new draft in my sandbox that I'll be editing more over the next week or so, and I was wondering whether you'd like to take a look at it and give your feedback before I make

1301:

My advice for you regarding improving the article is: After you've seen how quality article should look like, try to expand his "Life" and other sections. In that way, we can get rid of neutrality tag which is placed there. I see that you have good intentions and since you're so interested in this

1297:

them in order to change the main view won't be allowed. If you still feel otherwise, post this on the article talk page and more experienced users will address your issues. I think I've answered most of them here though, there's no need for asking every member of the community the same thing, it's

1245:

I said "slight fixes" since all I did was fix typos, some minor copy editing by removing some redundant wording as part of it (no meaning of any statements were even changed in this process). It is true though there have been many disruptive editors attacking this page, see I reverted one recently

876:

Hey, your efforts are deeply appreciated. I know exactly how it feels to see someone doing so many lame edits and to feel even more lamer going around undoing them. As you may well know, the user has got a 24-hour block (I expected this large scale disruption to attract the attention of the law by

339:

1162:

Have you noticed one by one few users deleted the original text matter which was representing the accurate data and that was added by me and other members by the passage of time (In last couple of weeks and months I was not able to contribute to Knowledge (XXG)) and eventually the text matter was

865:

Hi, Ugog Nizdast! As you can see, today and yesterday I reverted category spams, overcategorizations etc which Erim Turukku did on numerous articles. Despite your warnings, he continue doing exactly the same things as before - category spams, overcategorizations, Turkic/Turkish POV, edit warring,

1288:

of the community. If I didn't revert you, someone else would have. True, there have been disruptive editors and a few vandals who try to sabotage this article but they have been take care off, you needn't hold the everyone responsible. I can understand you urge to improve it further, since it is

1166:

I do respect of everyone's opinion but first of one must know the facts before posting and they are most welcome to contribute but rather than knowing the facts and figures few users just started using insulting language and alleging to a person who does social service merely to help people. Was

2459:

Haha, of course I'll keep this safely. I thought I had already did complete it since I didn't need to ask you for help that often, and you said your process was informal. Thank you very much for all your help...I learned a lot by observing how you did things and you were a good role model. Best

1603:

Thanks for the hearty reply. But how does Twinkle exactly work? I would like the message or warning sent to only a particular IP editor or user who tries to remove information and replace it with unverified content. Not to every person who tries to edit the page. So what should i enable for the

166:("Edit ") is currently available on the English Knowledge (XXG) only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to 1959:

Let me tell in detail... I edited the page on 29th.. I had LOGGED IN, while editing as i do always... Now, today saw your question.. It was not me, but my grandmom, who replied there...(without logging in, as she does not have a account.!!)... Now, i found that she had not logged in.!!!. So,

1174::- May I know what made you feel it was poorly cited. I always write on the basis of facts and I provided well documented matter with bunch of media reports, videos etc.... in order to support each statement. We're here to add value to Knowledge (XXG) not to promote what personally we like. 1181:

I can see that you are a member of "WikiProject India" so might be you can understand Hindi language, if it's so then I encourage you to go through all the facts which I provided and also watch the videos which will give you insight what made me write each phrase and sentence in the page.

1543:

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge (XXG). Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a

359:

Hi , Just dropped in to ask you a question regarding wikipedia policies. I had left a message on the talk page of sathya sai baba as well. The controversy section has been pushed so far down as if to imply it is of low importance. Will it be within wikipedia's policies to move it "up" ?

1623:

tutorial? I didn't even know there was one, really it's not that complicated...just enable it and experiment (you can always undo an edit). For example, for warning an IP, go to that IPs userpage and click on the 'TW' option. Let me know if you're having trouble getting it to work. -

395:), better to join such sections within the article and avoid harsh words. It should be in the most objective way possible. Of course, in the topic you're referring to, it cannot be helped...given the amount of controversies. I recently managed to re-work a criticism section in the 3013:, but that's just a minor issue. I think the archive box you're referring to is the {{talk header}} that I've just added to the original talk page. For most part, it's only used in pages that have a continuous level of activity and has a bigger box with a link to the archives. - 2840:

mistake so far among all my other such edits) and thanks for taking the time to bring this up. Also, it was good that you tried to remove the previous vandalism and don't hesitate to undo with an explanation next time when such a misunderstanding takes place. Sincerely,

176:". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at 1546:" So these edits are probably made by someone who is not experienced in editing and is not aware of their mistakes. We need to be careful dealing with new users who are simply confused about all the policies, guidelines and technical aspects of editing, be sure not to 1269:, poor language; in short, it is not written like an encyclopaedic article, more like something which belongs to his website. All your references in fact are from there or only the postive media coverage from there. His website (and other such) are not considered as 1289:

focusing only on his controversies as that has plenty of available references and it is covered well by the media; whether it's your personal view or not, there is not much you can change in that section. We write what the majority of the sources say, not the

2442:

Although I don't think you really needed adoption and I can't take any credit for your successes here, the least I could do is acknowledge that you are done with the program. Congratulations! You have completed the MrX absent-professor adoption program™. -

1849:

Why the details about the recent sex scandal have been removed from Tehlka page. It had impacted the organization as much and the organization has been facing criticism of covering up the complaint and not following proper laws laid down by Indian Govt.

866:

etc... Do what you think is the most appropriate in this case. As you may assume, I have other things to do here than to constantly follow around a category spammer, Turkic/Turkish POV nationalist or whatever he is and to revert his nonsense edits. --

699:

You are welcome. I am sure there are many and differing motivations for these long term problem editors but the simplest one may be that they do it because "they can" :-( It sure is nice to be able to go to Bishonen to get blocks handed out. Cheers.

2586:(I know it's lengthy, no need to read the whole thing...just understand the difference, I'll help in the rest) and then reporting back to me? Or are you referring to just dealing with inexperienced editors not editing properly (good-faith edits)? - 644:

Hello Ugog Nizdast. I wanted to drop a note of thanks for your help in dealing with the Burton-on-Trent vandal. He has been around at least three years so we will probably be dealing with him for some time to come. Your vigilance is appreciated.

842:

has gone off to a good start. There has been some logical issues raised and whose ever is supported in the end, remember that we can all learn something and benefit from this, as the content will only be improved. Awaiting your response there,

469:

headlong and deleting entire articles..Thanks for the tips re: writing articles in wikipedia..I like the idea of using the sandbox to write up the article , instead of editing the original page..Thank you for the answers and tips, sincerely,

459:

Hi, Thank you for the reply. I had also contacted a veteran user name Sean.hoyland re: the issue of structure of article. He also replied that there aren't many solid rules when it comes to internal structure of an article..According to him,

1158:

You used a phrase in your comment "much-discussed" none of the matter was discussed, eventually it was removed by one after another user and replaced by fake matter which was none other than accuses to a noble person without any grounds.

2136: 777:, violating talk page guidelines as well as removing references in the process. The user is also trying to glorify a particular article while constantly degrading other well cited articles. I could really use your help, thanks! - 1716:

No problem. I think you should have put a warning for adding unsourced content in this case rather than vandalism level 1 (there are many other warnings, have a look at them). Anyway now you got the hang of it. Have a nice day,

1222:) got involved and resulted to how the article is currently...more or less. It was stripped down to only its relevant content, many users continue to watch it in case disruption occurs again (when he again makes the headlines) 796:

since the gap is +24 hours) but anyhow edit warring needs to be stopped. I've sent a personal invitation to the user (also curtly mentioned about civility, no personal attacks) and initiated the discussion on the article talk

2216:

cluttered, wouldn't it then be best to just dump the Liberhan commission part (which has peripheral relevance at best) and just expand the riots section a bit? and would you mind self-reverting while we discuss this? Cheers,

3008:

I'm not sure I follow. You seem to have archived it properly and added the respective archive box template (Like this one on the right on my talk page). The only thing which was left to do was adding the archive template in

663:

to Bishonen again; this time, a one month block. I really won't be surprised if this happens again exactly after one month and wonder what's the motive behind all this pointless and silly disruption. Have a good day,

2235:...damn after I had just reverted the IP who blanked the section, I tried to quickly fix those sections which were being constantly removed and put back...wasn't really paying attention to what I was doing. I've 1557:

on your account, with that you can automatically warn offending new users in a nice way before taking any drastic step against them. This is how we usually tackle vandalism or good-faith unconstructive edits (see

2963:

Most welcome, it's normal to be confused with all this in the start...I myself was and asked a lot of silly questions. Don't hesitate to post here (or anywhere else) when you need help with something. Sincerely,

1573:. There are various noticeboards where the offenders can be reported for the admins to take necessary action against them. For example, a IP who continues to vandalise after multiple warnings can be reported at 571:

The statement that Carei was the la romanian city to be liberated by the soviet and roman armies is wrong. Carei was a Hungarian city and it was (occupied) not liberated just like the rest of the Erdely region

2948:

Thanks! I guess if I'd been diligent I could have discovered this for myself, but anyhow, that was much needed. Yes, those were some of the pages I was referring to; there are several others as well. Gracias,

931:

Hmm interesting...I'm not sure if just their area of edits and such similarity in their posts is enough to warrant an investigation. You, the other users and the admins involved will probably figure out if a

324:. It wasn't my intention but all I did was undo a new user's suspicious edit which anyone would have done at first glance while patrolling. But I apologise for not looking at the article history. Sincerely, 2575:

particular article but still needs better sourcing. In anycase, most of the our Indian articles here are in poor shape, so there's not much point in deleting such content if you can't add anything better...

791:

right? Just looked at it and this is bad, there has been pointless warring for almost a month. In more technical terms, the 3RR has not been violated (if I'm not wrong this case won't be considered in the

3051:

article for GA status. I noticed that the article doesn't seem to have the GA icon, though. Could you please add it? I'm a little cautious about doing it myself, since I nominated the article. Thanks, --

2536:

add another History section focusing just on this country specific background when it could be merged with the "Cultivation" or "Etymology" section, which also mention its global perspective. Sincerely,

1966:

Infact, initially i thought you are saying i made that edit(on 29th) without logging in.!!! Thanx for reverting.Hope i did not violate any policy of wiki. I am here to contribute and share correct info.

2884:

Hey, since you've helped me out before: do you know how to request an archive of a talk page? I've come across a bunch that could really do with cleanup. I'd do it myself, too, if I knew how... Thanks,

414:

I would advise you to exercise caution while working in such areas...wait till you learn more about basic editing and how we work here. As you've mentioned on your Userpage, why don't you try expanding

246:. Excluding you're edit which seems sourceable, if it weren't for this guideline, what will stop people from putting their own opinion saying it's a basic fact?...there are numerous additions everyday. 1362:

and I told the user to make a draft too. Not heard anything since so I assume the user is inactive and you know about this person right? Anyway, I'll check it out when I get time and will reply in

2504: 800:

Since this a new user we need to be lenient, but if the warring still continues (I hope you don't revert now EVEN if the user does it to you till the discussion is over) we can report this on the

2985:

Hey sorry to bother you again. I followed your instructions, which worked for the most part, except the archive doesn't appear in the archives box on the original talk page. The original page is

659:

Hey, thanks MarnetteD. I must admit I'm quite baffled with this long-term mass disruption. As you may know, they're back after a two week block with a different IP address and I've reported this

1963:

Hope, it's clear. I always edit while i am logged in. I respect wiki's policies. I understand, these problems occur when someone does edits without logging in. So, i think now i am clear..

1562:, where we warned this IP using twinkle after reverting vandalism). There are different levels of warnings, after usually three-four, and if the disruption continues, we can report them. 1774:. Remember it's not always like that...having enough references doesn't mean that makes the content automatically fit for the article. Appreciate you discussing this here, I said in 2660: 2645: 1003: 2993:

which was the link supplied by the archive box on the original talk page. Anyhow, I messed up someplace, not clear where. Halp! before some doofus re-inserts fossilized content.

1702:

on the IP editor's page. I have to subsequently increase the level of warnings if the editor doesn't respond positively, right? Your instructions really helped. Really grateful.

3066:

Hmm someone has already added for us, I wonder why legobot didn't do it? I thought I did followed the correct procedure and this usually works. Have any clue what I did wrong? -

1908:

Hi. Glad to give you clarification. I edited the page on 29 november 2013, while i was logged in.as i do always... Now, i have given the reason for that. Thanx for contacting.

877:

itself) and hopefully doesn't resume this. I guess it's my turn to do the dirty work and have cleaned up whatever was remaining, hope I didn't miss anything. Have a good day,

808:. I'm not so familiar with this topic and if discussing also remains fruitless, I'll try to contact some users who are good at articles related to this; other options include 1872:

Hi, the case has been covered in short, clear and concise way, I don't see anything wrong with it. I think the main guidelines of Knowledge (XXG) which you need to read are

2239:...this was what I actually wanted to do, thanks for taking the trouble to point this out. Next if I make such a big blunder, don't hesitate to revert me. Have a nice day, 1474:

Hi. Really? could you provide some links to prominent news reports? I could help you then, otherwise if I get time I'll search for it myself. Thanks for pointing this out,

2389: 126: 2161: 1302:

topic, surely you can try this. If you're edits get reverted, they obviously need to be improved and find out what that is. Feel free to ask anything else. Sincerely,

891:

Thanks for cleaning up the rest of his nonsense edits. By the way, according to what Kansas Bear said on Erim Turukku's talk page, it may be possible that Turukku and

2344:

Not a problem. Added to my watchlist, looks like several editors are reverted those additions besides you. If this continues, we may have to report this user at the

238:

Hi and welcome, I'm glad that you have so much interest in improving the Kerala article. Sadly, even statements which you consider bare facts need citations (Read

972: 773:

revert rule? A new user is constantly reverting edits on an article, is refusing to discuss things on the concerned article's talk page, therefore engaging in

435:...I know there's a lot to read at first but I'm sure you'll get the hang of it soon...you already seem to know the basics. Additionally, you can refer to the 2321:

adds information and cites a personal blog as a source. The blog entry has no mention of any reliable sources. Repeated pleas for engaging in a discussion (

1884:. After you've read those three links which I've provided and still feel you're have queries feel free to ask me it. There is a reason why those pages were 3028:

Well, maybe you don't follow but you certainly fixed it, so thanks. The link to the archive was not appearing in the appropriate tp section. Thanks again,

2630:) ? I could do this on your behalf, but you know more about the topics range and what the IP is upto, I think it's better if you do it. Would that work? - 3094:

Turns out, our entire review has been overlooked by the bot--I think this is mainly because of that page move which I did. I've asked Bluemoonset again (

2049:

using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

1813: 3143: 253:

available which echo what you've added? If you feel there's something factually wrong with the content anywhere, why don't you point it out here or the

321: 1797:

Hi : The relevance of the content is subjective opinion. I believe the recent controversies and Shoma's reaction are very much relevant to this page.

2106:

We hope you enjoy maintaining Knowledge (XXG) with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at

1273:. The main view of the media is removed and there is strong defence/support for him. Since you're not an experience editor here, look at any of our 294:

seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2179:

Whoa, looks like you got the whole community to comment there. I'll see if I can find anything/make any constructive suggestions. Have a nice day,

2290: 1761: 3162:

I'm have happy to have completed this under your guidance! Thank you for everything, and I hope to start reviewing more regularly soon. -

2483:

I gave inline references and published citations too. May I know for some references how the whole post is invaluable and got deleted ?

2862: 2813: 1857: 1459: 2046: 1234: 535:

Extremely sorry! I knew I had misclicked rollback but when I checked it first it didn't show up...so I thought everything was fine. -

1745:

I would like to know why the edits were reverted despite the fact that references were provided more than what counts as sufficient.

1664:

on the IP's page and another editor added the deletion tag to it after that. I think I know what you did wrong, you must have viewed

287: 177: 1047: 89: 2663:, providing few of the links to just some of the reverts that have taken place. Take a look/comment and watch it for any updates. - 1293:. I do understand a bit of it and Hindi language sources can be used (English is preferred as this is English Knowledge (XXG)) but 1359: 588: 81: 76: 64: 59: 1219: 2622:

Umm, I'm not an admin! Since the IP is grossly reverting and disrupting why don't you report him to the relevant noticeboard (

813: 172: 936:

is needed; I've no experience in this sort of detective work yet. Violated the 1RR rule eh? I hope someone has posted in the

145: 2090: 2571:

are two possibilities: 1) It should be removed like this on the grounds of being poorly sourced 2) It could be relevant to

2329:) have been evaded by this user. I have exhausted all the civil options. I don't think posting a warning will help either. 419:? Currently lacks sources, poor language and overall looks like it's in a bad condition. If not confident, you can edit in 286:. Knowledge (XXG) is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a 2931: 219: 1167:

there any ground of saying all that, no. All the ref links are unreliable sources and this is considered as vandalism.

185: 3010: 2990: 2927: 1987: 1924: 1185:

If anyone go through the text matter which was added then they can say it well documented so question doesn't arise.

769:

Thanks for the barn star! I was wondering are you aware of the consequences of violating talk page guidelines and the

2661:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:67.247.54.159 reported by User:Ugog Nizdast (Result: )

1809: 3126: 2901: 391:) violates it and is definitely biased. Also, adding a "criticism/controversy" section is usually discouraged (See 38: 1294: 809: 1559: 1452:

There is clear evidence in the 2003 ASI report that there is evidence of temple there. Please review the report

1406: 914:

Well, Turukku's 24h block expired and it seems he plans to continue as before. How he's reverting at the article

839: 420: 1775: 1230: 1121:

some places up in this page). I guess even the most experienced editors can make this mistake. Good day to you,

163: 3048: 2294: 1805: 242:), exceptions are obviously undisputed ones. Ov≈erhere, we strictly reflect what the sources say and there is 1757: 1604:

article? Would CSD do the job or should I just RPP for the page? This is confusing. The video tutorial on the

1566: 749:

is a dynamic and the vandalism was done by someone else who shares it you at that particular time. Sincerely,

387:

guideline here, moving a criticism section upwards on an article about an individual (no matter how bad...see

1861: 2866: 2817: 2655:

Sure. That's just the normal final level warning template while reverting vandalism before reporting to the

1673: 1463: 554: 525: 181: 2858: 2809: 2349: 2286: 2107: 1975: 1912: 1885: 1853: 1801: 1749: 1455: 1043: 941: 576: 207: 3167: 3103: 3071: 3018: 2969: 2939: 2846: 2787: 2733: 2668: 2635: 2591: 2541: 2465: 2357: 2244: 2184: 2003: 1941: 1893: 1834: 1826: 1787: 1722: 1681: 1628: 1590: 1479: 1371: 1307: 1126: 1118: 1023: 949: 882: 848: 821: 754: 727: 690: 669: 629: 540: 495: 474: 448: 365: 345: 329: 262: 203:

The assumption that all cited texts are facts is nonsense.Shame that you deny plain and well known facts

47: 17: 2583: 2078: 1753: 1538: 1285: 461: 377: 3095: 3033: 2998: 2954: 2913: 2890: 2769: 2611: 2334: 2262: 2221: 1707: 1651: 1613: 1519: 1144:

I'm glad that I got a change to share my thoughts with you. This message in context of Asaram Bapu page

1051: 971:

After some looking into how to do it, I just opened an SPI on EMr KnG / Erim Turukku, you can see it at

833: 778: 746: 1661: 1071: 740: 723: 341: 2578:

I'd like to help you in tackling vandalism but I hope you first know the difference between it and a

2523: 2382: 2375: 2198: 2169: 2023: 1363: 1349: 1337: 1333: 788: 603: 584: 580: 2509: 1605: 1554: 1262: 1396:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1205: 1189: 705: 685:

Just noticed that you have done the dirty work this time and reverted all the edits. Thanks a lot!

650: 303: 295: 167: 2691: 1881: 1355: 440: 233: 211: 3080:

There might be an issue with the bot; it has stopped working for short periods of time before. --

2560: 2488: 2111: 1193: 1163:

getting deleted and replaced by irrelevant material by some users who just tried to experiment.

899:? As you know, in most cases its illegal to have two accounts on WP. And, edits of both Turukku ( 660: 550: 521: 140: 115: 108: 2829: 2098: 2069: 2062: 2054: 1979: 1916: 1570: 1290: 1211: 937: 2102:- Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! 3163: 3099: 3067: 3014: 2986: 2965: 2935: 2842: 2783: 2729: 2709: 2664: 2659:. Since this was not vandalism but disruptive editing, I've filed a report detailing this at 2631: 2587: 2537: 2527: 2461: 2353: 2240: 2180: 1999: 1937: 1889: 1830: 1783: 1718: 1693: 1677: 1624: 1586: 1475: 1367: 1303: 1122: 1019: 945: 878: 844: 817: 750: 686: 665: 625: 536: 491: 485: 470: 444: 361: 325: 291: 258: 215: 2627: 1877: 1771: 1547: 1266: 896: 805: 793: 424: 392: 384: 239: 3029: 2994: 2950: 2909: 2905: 2886: 2765: 2330: 2310: 2258: 2217: 1703: 1647: 1609: 1532: 1515: 1499: 1495: 1063: 1007: 2656: 2623: 2579: 2345: 1873: 1779: 1582: 1574: 1258: 1067: 959: 933: 919: 900: 801: 774: 770: 465: 407:

so we are even more strict, and anyone would agree she easily fails the criteria for being

404: 243: 2396: 2194: 2165: 2156: 2147: 2118: 2019: 1983: 1920: 1101: 1085: 976: 963: 923: 906: 867: 613: 2644:

Oh! As you had placed the ban warning I thought you were. Mea Culpa! I've reprted him at

2517: 1278: 1274: 1270: 617: 436: 432: 428: 250: 3171: 3153: 3107: 3089: 3075: 3060: 3037: 3022: 3002: 2973: 2958: 2943: 2917: 2894: 2870: 2850: 2821: 2791: 2773: 2751: 2737: 2713: 2672: 2639: 2595: 2564: 2545: 2492: 2469: 2450: 2413: 2361: 2338: 2298: 2266: 2248: 2225: 2202: 2188: 2173: 2128: 2027: 2007: 1991: 1945: 1928: 1897: 1865: 1838: 1817: 1791: 1726: 1711: 1685: 1655: 1632: 1617: 1594: 1523: 1483: 1467: 1442: 1375: 1341: 1311: 1197: 1130: 1111: 1089: 1055: 1027: 1012: 979: 966: 953: 926: 909: 886: 870: 852: 825: 781: 758: 731: 708: 694: 673: 653: 633: 592: 558: 544: 529: 499: 478: 452: 369: 349: 333: 307: 266: 223: 189: 152: 122: 3085: 3056: 2803: 1435: 1100:

Thankx a lot for notice that one.Really,i wasn't aware of,pushed it while using mobile.

701: 680: 646: 517: 416: 396: 315: 299: 283: 621: 2649: 2615: 2556: 2484: 2447: 135: 3149: 2723: 2705: 2500: 1782:

issue when I reverted your edit. I'll try to improve the article after some time. -

1416: 1076: 892: 423:

and then copy the content into the article. Some pages you will need to read are:

1960:

immediately i logged in to clarify, my point...And, yes she is a different user.

1215: 490:

Most welcome, if you need any more help you can always ask me. Have a nice day,

254: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2427: 616:

first. If no one objects, you can surely remove it and I hope that you have a

3081: 3052: 1699: 1427: 1327: 2326: 940:

or on admin Dougweller's page. Looks like the user can't edit here as per

2444: 996: 278: 2135: 962:, I myself don't have much experience about things like that too... -- 915: 388: 2322: 2110:

and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks!

2309:

Hi. Sorry for disturbing you again, but again we have a vandal on

1676:) and along with 'ARV', 'TB' there will also be a 'warn' option. - 1668:

not the user page. So try it again on the IP user page/talk page (

1581:

even after the final warning, you'll have to report the IP at the

1537:, those edits seem disruptive but are not exactly vandalism. From 1284:

You did replace well-sourced content which was put there with the

1225:

I really don't understand your question about my edits though. I

2193:

yeah, better to have as much input as possible in peer review.--

1281:, then you'll get an idea how quality articles should look like. 2836:

it not removed it. Once again I apologise (at least this is my

1393:

Hello, Ugog Nizdast. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2828:

Hi extremely sorry for this! I was just getting used to using

2232: 1998:

Thanks for clarifying, I've replied again on your talk page. -

25: 2499:

Hi and sorry if I seemed a bit abrupt. These two references:

1575:

Noticeboard for administrators intervention against vandalism

1253:

Look, there is so much anyone experienced here can say about

2764:

For all-round great work, but especially counter-vandalism.

2392:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2374: 2318: 1386: 1145: 129:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

107: 2802:

Hello, I received your message that you undid my change to

1137:

Looking For Your Response Related To Asaram Bapu Page Edits

3047:

Hi, Ugog Nizdast. Thank you for reviewing and passing the

2257:

Haha no prob, totally done the same thing before. Cheers,

1210:

Hello, I appreciate you taking up this matter with me and

975:. If you have something to add, etc feel free to do it. -- 1004:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics

3096:

User talk:BlueMoonset#Question about moving review pages

2648:. Perhaps you could support my complaint? -- Thanks! -- 2646:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

2530:. If they seem fine then the other issue is the content. 549:

No worries! Stuff like that happens to the best of us.--

2314: 2276: 2236: 1565:

Regular users (like us) can get additional rights (See

1511: 1507: 1503: 1398: 1254: 1247: 1242: 1238: 903: 895:

are the same person. If that's the case, would it be a

609: 400: 2926:

I think I know some of the pages you're referring to,

2923:

after saving that you remove it from the target page.

2582:. As your homework, would you consider reading it at 1956:

fine... i got ur question now....!!!..finally... :)

1117:

Hey no problem, it happened to me recently too (see

2094:- See how you are faring against other STiki users! 1326:any changes to the actual page. Here is the link: 257:, so that we can do something about it? Sincerely, 2855:No problem, and thanks for the quick correction! 2085:Here are some pages which are a little more fun: 1153:"POV-pushing, mass replacement of much-discussed" 973:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/EMr KnG 2522:. I not sure about the reliability of these two: 1328:https://en.wikipedia.org/User:RagnarFsks/sandbox 2704:Thank you for contributing to Knowledge (XXG)! 2381:Hello, Ugog Nizdast. You have new messages at 1741:Why reverted the edits to Shoma Chaudhury page. 1498:IP editor is resorting continuous vandalism of 1070:. Feel free to remove the section if you want. 114:Hello, Ugog Nizdast. You have new messages at 3146:. Thanks for your service to Knowledge (XXG), 2079:Information about vandalism on Knowledge (XXG) 3144:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Good article nominations 2154:Would you like to have a look at the article 2018:Thanks for your advice. It is helpful to me. 8: 787:Hey, you're very welcome. Referring only to 745:Don't worry that wasn't you..the IP address 439:to see how to write better articles or read 2782:Thanks so much...I really appreciate this! 1229:try to leave an apt (sometimes even silly) 612:of yours, it's better to explain it on the 516:Hi Ugog. Why did you revert my edit to the 2614:as he keeps vandalizing pages? Thanks! -- 1660:Oops, looks like you've accidentally used 3124: 2555:can you help me how to report vandalism. 2425: 1874:our biographies of living persons policy 1257:of this article. It does not follow the 918:, which is as you know a subject to the 173:MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable 2516:the third one was a blog (again, not a 1825:I've replied down, where your post is. 1560:User_talk:195.215.130.197#November_2013 1148:which was just lately modified by you. 1354:Of course, as you may know previously 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1952:ohk..!!!...now i got ur question..... 411:controversial to have such a section. 178:Knowledge (XXG):VisualEditor/Feedback 7: 1397: 1172:"sourced content with poorly cited". 1146:https://en.wikipedia.org/Asaram_Bapu 1569:) but blocking can only be done by 1502:. The most recent being yesterday. 958:I just informed Dougweller. As for 1878:Knowledge (XXG) is not a news site 1237:. What edit are you referring to? 717:Mistake in User talk:162.78.70.162 24: 3135:Good Article Recruitment Barnstar 1827:User talk:Ugog Nizdast#Reg Tehlka 1772:Knowledge (XXG):BLPN#Tarun_Tejpal 620:for your reason for removal (See 195:Removal of addition from "Kerala" 3125: 2798:Change to Captain Planet article 2750: 2690: 2508:are self published sources (See 2426: 2134: 1936:I've replied on you talk page. - 1366:when I'm done. Good day to you, 380:, or any other experienced user. 376:type of questions to me, at the 340:wasn't me--Have I been hacked? 277: 29: 1764:) 18:41, 22 November 2013‎(UTC) 1318:Yale World Fellows Program page 2906:User:ClueBot III#Documentation 2436:The Adoptee Graduation Diploma 2313:article. Have a look at this 2211:Re: Your edit to Narendra Modi 1: 2932:Talk:Indian National Congress 2362:15:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 2339:18:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2299:11:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 2267:13:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 2249:13:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 2226:11:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 2203:18:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 2189:09:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 2174:19:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 2129:06:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 2028:22:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 2008:14:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 1992:14:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 1946:14:07, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 1929:13:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 1898:04:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1866:04:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1839:04:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1818:04:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1792:18:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1727:15:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1712:15:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1686:19:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1656:19:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1633:10:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1618:10:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1595:07:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1553:I think it's time you enable 1524:04:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 1484:07:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 1468:05:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 1443:18:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1376:08:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 1358:asked me the very same thing 1342:21:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 1312:20:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 1198:17:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 1131:20:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 1112:20:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 567:Regarding the 25 october post 3172:15:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3154:13:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3108:07:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3090:07:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3076:06:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3061:04:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3038:07:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 3023:05:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 3003:22:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2974:21:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2959:21:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2944:14:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2871:21:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2851:20:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2822:20:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 1583:Admin noticeboard/ Incidents 1402:at any time by removing the 1241:is pretty self-explanatory, 1090:18:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1056:16:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1028:05:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1013:05:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 980:19:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 967:19:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 954:17:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 927:17:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 910:21:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 887:20:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 871:15:47, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 853:20:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 826:17:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 782:06:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 759:17:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 732:14:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 709:17:55, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 695:17:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 674:16:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 654:16:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 634:14:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 593:08:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 559:07:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 545:07:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 530:06:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 500:13:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC) 479:12:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC) 453:20:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 370:17:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 350:14:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 334:06:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 322:why did I just get templated 308:20:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 267:06:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 224:18:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC) 190:20:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 153:14:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 123:14:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 3011:Talk:L. K. Advani/Archive 1 2991:Talk:L. K. Advani/Archive 1 2928:Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party 2918:21:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 2895:21:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 2792:06:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 2774:21:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 2738:16:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 2714:16:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 2673:19:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 2640:18:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 2596:03:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 2565:02:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 2546:08:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 2493:07:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 2470:17:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2451:15:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2414:19:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 2070:Comparison with other tools 2063:Using STiki and its hotkeys 1506:, like the previous ones ( 905:) look really similar... -- 3188: 2902:Help:Archiving a talk page 2283:it is a theory is it not 2014:3rd Opinion, Eva de Braose 249:Surely there must be some 3131: 2749: 2698:A Tesla Roadster for you! 2689: 2683:A Tesla Roadster for you! 2432: 2133: 2047:your recent contributions 2041:Hello, Ugog Nizdast, and 1062:Comment posted by banned 403:); here the subject is a 158:Opting in to VisualEditor 3049:Asia Bibi blasphemy case 3043:Asia Bibi blasphemy case 2305:Edit on Mariam-uz-Zamani 722:me--Have I been hacked? 255:Kerala article talk page 170:and choosing the item, " 2610:Could you please block 2231:Oh you mean my edit on 2055:Information about STiki 1674:User talk:180.151.20.56 1235:my recent contributions 2383:Enock4seth's talk page 2379: 2368:RE: A barnstar for you 1666:the contributions page 1490:Blocking an IP address 1391: 1018:Okay, I will. Thanks, 320:Whoa..I was wondering 290:. Your recent edit to 112: 18:User talk:Ugog Nizdast 2758:The Original Barnstar 2378: 2091:The STiki leaderboard 1390: 1066:. Remove comment per 814:WP:Dispute resolution 385:neutral point of view 288:neutral point of view 111: 42:of past discussions. 3142:leave a question at 2728:Wow, thanks a lot! - 1806:98.109.34.102 (Talk) 1608:is also ineligible. 1298:bit a waste of time. 789:Ruqaiya Sultan Begum 433:no original research 244:no original research 116:WDGraham's talk page 98:October–January 2014 2989:and the archive is 2743:A barnstar for you! 2108:the STiki talk page 1322:Dear Ugog Nizdast, 520:article just now?-- 383:It's all about our 2832:and I thought you 2652:, 7 January 2014. 2618:, 7 January 2014. 2612:user:67.247.54.159 2606:User:67.247.54.159 2390:remove this notice 2380: 1399:remove this notice 1392: 1002:Take the issue to 747:User:162.78.70.162 551:eh bien mon prince 522:eh bien mon prince 182:Whatamidoing (WMF) 127:remove this notice 113: 3159: 3158: 2987:Talk:L. K. Advani 2861:comment added by 2812:comment added by 2779: 2778: 2719: 2718: 2501:tamilnation.co.in 2456: 2455: 2289:comment added by 2275:Human evolution ( 2142: 2141: 2127: 2033:Welcome to STiki! 1995: 1978:comment added by 1932: 1915:comment added by 1856:comment added by 1821: 1804:comment added by 1766: 1752:comment added by 1458:comment added by 1275:featured articles 1046:comment added by 614:article talk page 596: 579:comment added by 393:Criticism section 292:Iglesia ni Cristo 227: 210:comment added by 162:As you may know, 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3179: 3152: 3129: 3122: 3121: 3118:Congratulations! 3098:)...let's see. - 2873: 2824: 2754: 2747: 2746: 2727: 2694: 2687: 2686: 2430: 2423: 2422: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2393: 2311:Mariam-uz-Zamani 2301: 2138: 2125: 2123: 2115: 2114:(developer) and 2045:! Thank you for 2043:welcome to STiki 2037: 2036: 1994: 1972: 1931: 1909: 1904:regarding edit.. 1868: 1820: 1798: 1770:Hi, Please read 1765: 1746: 1698:! I have posted 1697: 1536: 1504:This latest edit 1500:Mariam uz-Zamani 1470: 1440: 1433: 1423: 1421: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1401: 1389: 1353: 1271:reliable sources 1209: 1109: 1082: 1079: 1074: 1064:User:CharlieJS13 1058: 1040: 1010: 837: 810:WP:Third opinion 744: 684: 607: 595: 573: 489: 429:reliable sources 401:see my edit here 319: 281: 251:reliable sources 237: 226: 204: 175: 168:your preferences 148: 143: 138: 130: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3187: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3147: 3120: 3045: 2900:Have a look at 2882: 2880:Could you help? 2856: 2807: 2800: 2745: 2721: 2685: 2608: 2580:good-faith edit 2518:reliable source 2478: 2421: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2394: 2387: 2372: 2370: 2307: 2284: 2281: 2237:fixed it on now 2213: 2162:the peer review 2160:and comment in 2157:Pather Panchali 2152: 2148:Pather Panchali 2119: 2117: 2035: 2016: 1973: 1954: 1910: 1906: 1851: 1847: 1799: 1776:my edit summary 1754:59.178.212.176 1747: 1743: 1691: 1530: 1492: 1453: 1450: 1436: 1428: 1424: 1419: 1413: 1409: 1407:You've got mail 1403: 1395: 1387: 1384: 1347: 1320: 1259:manner of style 1233:, just look at 1203: 1139: 1102: 1098: 1080: 1077: 1072: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1008: 1000: 902:) and EMr KnG ( 863: 831: 767: 738: 719: 678: 642: 601: 574: 569: 514: 483: 357: 355:Sathya sai baba 313: 275: 231: 205: 197: 171: 160: 146: 141: 136: 131: 120: 105: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3185: 3183: 3175: 3174: 3157: 3156: 3138: 3137: 3132: 3130: 3119: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3044: 3041: 3026: 3025: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2924: 2881: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2804:Captain Planet 2799: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2777: 2776: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2744: 2741: 2717: 2716: 2701: 2700: 2695: 2684: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2607: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2576: 2549: 2548: 2532: 2531: 2477: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2454: 2453: 2439: 2438: 2433: 2431: 2420: 2417: 2386: 2373: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2306: 2303: 2291:176.202.95.179 2280: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2252: 2251: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2151: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2132: 2104: 2103: 2095: 2083: 2082: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2066: 2034: 2031: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1996: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1888:. Sincerely, 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1795: 1794: 1778:that it was a 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1598: 1597: 1578: 1571:administrators 1567:WP:user rights 1563: 1551: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1449: 1446: 1394: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1364:your talk page 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1299: 1295:cherry picking 1282: 1261:, loaded with 1251: 1223: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 999: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 922:limitation. -- 862: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 840:the discussion 798: 766: 763: 762: 761: 718: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 676: 641: 638: 637: 636: 624:). Sincerely, 568: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 518:Ottoman Empire 513: 512:Ottoman Empire 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 417:G. R. Gopinath 412: 397:Sagarika Ghose 381: 356: 353: 337: 336: 298:. Thank you. 274: 271: 270: 269: 247: 196: 193: 159: 156: 121:Message added 119: 106: 104: 101: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3184: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3145: 3140: 3139: 3136: 3133: 3128: 3123: 3117: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3042: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2879: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863:75.117.231.11 2860: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2814:75.117.231.11 2811: 2805: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2780: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2748: 2742: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2725: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2688: 2682: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2605: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2569: 2568: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2519: 2513: 2511: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2481: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2434: 2429: 2424: 2418: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2391: 2384: 2377: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350:WP:COMPETENCE 2347: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2304: 2302: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2278: 2274: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2210: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2137: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2124: 2122: 2113: 2112:West.andrew.g 2109: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058:, including: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2048: 2044: 2039: 2038: 2032: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1957: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1882:recent events 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1858:98.109.34.102 1855: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1740: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1695: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1540: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496:180.151.20.56 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460:99.253.241.12 1457: 1447: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1434: 1431: 1418: 1408: 1400: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1351: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1279:good articles 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1249: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1212:your civility 1207: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1173: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1154: 1149: 1147: 1142: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1075: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1005: 998: 995: 981: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 965: 961: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 942:WP:COMPETENCE 939: 935: 930: 929: 928: 925: 921: 917: 913: 912: 911: 908: 904: 901: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 875: 874: 873: 872: 869: 860: 854: 850: 846: 841: 835: 834:Animefreak234 829: 828: 827: 823: 819: 816:. Sincerely, 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 779:Animefreak234 776: 772: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 742: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 716: 710: 707: 703: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 682: 677: 675: 671: 667: 662: 658: 657: 656: 655: 652: 648: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622:verifiability 619: 615: 611: 605: 599: 598: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 566: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 519: 511: 501: 497: 493: 487: 482: 481: 480: 476: 472: 467: 463: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 450: 446: 443:. Sincerely, 442: 438: 437:good articles 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 413: 410: 406: 405:living person 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 379: 374: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 354: 352: 351: 347: 343: 335: 331: 327: 323: 317: 312: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 280: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 241: 235: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 201: 194: 192: 191: 187: 183: 180:. Thank you, 179: 174: 169: 165: 157: 155: 154: 151: 150: 149: 144: 139: 128: 124: 117: 110: 102: 100: 99: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3164:Ugog Nizdast 3134: 3100:Ugog Nizdast 3068:Ugog Nizdast 3046: 3027: 3015:Ugog Nizdast 2984: 2966:Ugog Nizdast 2936:Ugog Nizdast 2883: 2857:— Preceding 2843:Ugog Nizdast 2837: 2833: 2808:— Preceding 2801: 2784:Ugog Nizdast 2757: 2730:Ugog Nizdast 2720: 2697: 2665:Ugog Nizdast 2632:Ugog Nizdast 2609: 2588:Ugog Nizdast 2584:WP:VANDALISM 2572: 2538:Ugog Nizdast 2515: 2507: 2505:geotamil.com 2482: 2479: 2462:Ugog Nizdast 2435: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2395: 2354:Ugog Nizdast 2308: 2285:— Preceding 2282: 2241:Ugog Nizdast 2214: 2181:Ugog Nizdast 2164:? Regards.-- 2155: 2153: 2146: 2120: 2116: 2105: 2097: 2089: 2084: 2077: 2068: 2061: 2053: 2042: 2040: 2017: 2000:Ugog Nizdast 1974:— Preceding 1965: 1962: 1958: 1955: 1938:Ugog Nizdast 1911:— Preceding 1907: 1890:Ugog Nizdast 1852:— Preceding 1848: 1831:Ugog Nizdast 1800:— Preceding 1796: 1784:Ugog Nizdast 1748:— Preceding 1744: 1719:Ugog Nizdast 1694:Ugog Nizdast 1678:Ugog Nizdast 1669: 1665: 1625:Ugog Nizdast 1587:Ugog Nizdast 1542: 1539:WP:Vandalism 1493: 1476:Ugog Nizdast 1454:— Preceding 1451: 1448:Babri Mosque 1437: 1429: 1425: 1368:Ugog Nizdast 1356:User:Umerama 1331: 1324: 1321: 1304:Ugog Nizdast 1286:WP:CONSENSUS 1255:your version 1231:edit summary 1226: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1171: 1170:As you said 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1151:As you said 1150: 1143: 1140: 1123:Ugog Nizdast 1105: 1104: 1099: 1042:— Preceding 1037: 1020:Ugog Nizdast 1001: 946:Ugog Nizdast 893:User:EMr KnG 879:Ugog Nizdast 864: 845:Ugog Nizdast 818:Ugog Nizdast 768: 751:Ugog Nizdast 741:Aaronfaletto 724:Aaronfaletto 720: 687:Ugog Nizdast 666:Ugog Nizdast 643: 626:Ugog Nizdast 575:— Preceding 570: 537:Ugog Nizdast 515: 492:Ugog Nizdast 486:Lookinhotbra 471:Lookinhotbra 462:WP:STRUCTURE 445:Ugog Nizdast 421:your sandbox 408: 378:WP:Help desk 362:Lookinhotbra 358: 342:Aaronfaletto 338: 326:Ugog Nizdast 296:my talk page 276: 273:October 2013 259:Ugog Nizdast 206:— Preceding 202: 198: 164:VisualEditor 161: 134: 133: 132: 97: 96: 70: 43: 37: 3030:Vanamonde93 2995:Vanamonde93 2951:Vanamonde93 2910:Green Giant 2887:Vanamonde93 2766:Green Giant 2331:Ananya 2012 2259:Vanamonde93 2218:Vanamonde93 1704:Ananya 2012 1662:WP:Talkback 1648:Ananya 2012 1610:Ananya 2012 1533:Ananya 2012 1516:Ananya 2012 1267:non-neutral 1216:Jimbo Wales 1048:86.160.8.72 1009:Redtigerxyz 425:how to cite 282:Hello, I'm 36:This is an 2510:WP:SELFPUB 2419:Graduation 2121:Tentinator 1845:Reg Tehlka 1606:WP:TWINKLE 1555:WP:TWINKLE 1350:RagnarFsks 1334:RagnarFsks 1263:WP:PEACOCK 1119:this topic 1106:zeeyanwiki 1039:(Redacted) 977:Sundostund 964:Sundostund 924:Sundostund 907:Sundostund 868:Sundostund 604:EnrikeKeXy 581:EnrikeKeXy 441:this essay 125:. You can 90:Archive 10 2567:Arulraja 2495:Arulraja 2195:Dwaipayan 2166:Dwaipayan 2099:Userboxes 1886:protected 1700:warning 1 1548:bite them 1529:Hi again 1422:template. 1360:over here 1248:this edit 1220:this link 702:MarnetteD 681:MarnetteD 647:MarnetteD 610:this edit 399:article ( 316:Elizium23 300:Elizium23 284:Elizium23 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2859:unsigned 2830:WP:STiki 2810:unsigned 2650:fdewaele 2616:fdewaele 2460:wishes, 2388:You can 2287:unsigned 1988:contribs 1976:unsigned 1925:contribs 1913:unsigned 1854:unsigned 1814:contribs 1802:unsigned 1762:contribs 1750:unsigned 1670:this one 1456:unsigned 1332:Thanks, 1291:WP:truth 1206:Devoutly 1190:Devoutly 1044:unsigned 997:Savarkar 938:WP:AN3RR 589:contribs 577:unsigned 220:contribs 208:unsigned 103:Talkback 3150:Quadell 2724:Gg53000 2706:Gg53000 2628:WP:ANEW 2315:editing 2024:at Wiki 1690:Thanks 1426:-- 1265:words, 1188:Thanks 1141:Hello, 1034:Comment 897:WP:SOCK 830:UPDATE 806:WP:ANEW 794:WP:3RRN 240:WP:CITE 234:Monns12 212:Monns12 39:archive 2657:WP:AIV 2624:WP:ANI 2399:→Enock 2346:WP:ANI 2317:. The 1780:WP:BLP 1512:edit 2 1508:edit 1 1227:always 1218:, see 1086:en-2.5 1068:WP:BAN 960:WP:SPI 934:WP:SPI 916:Attila 838:Well, 802:WP:ANI 775:WP:WAR 771:WP:3RR 640:Thanks 618:source 466:WP:DUE 389:Hitler 147:Graham 2838:first 2834:added 2476:Mango 2327:talk2 2323:talk1 1980:Ab hg 1917:Ab hg 1544:page. 1382:Email 1246:with 1096:India 1081:hotch 797:page. 16:< 3168:talk 3104:talk 3086:talk 3082:1ST7 3072:talk 3057:talk 3053:1ST7 3034:talk 3019:talk 2999:talk 2970:talk 2955:talk 2940:talk 2930:and 2914:talk 2904:and 2891:talk 2867:talk 2847:talk 2818:talk 2788:talk 2770:talk 2734:talk 2710:talk 2669:talk 2636:talk 2592:talk 2573:that 2561:talk 2557:Arul 2542:talk 2514:and 2503:and 2489:talk 2485:Arul 2480:Hi, 2466:talk 2409:seth 2358:talk 2348:per 2335:talk 2325:and 2319:user 2295:talk 2277:diff 2263:talk 2245:talk 2222:talk 2199:talk 2185:talk 2170:talk 2020:Doug 2004:talk 1984:talk 1942:talk 1921:talk 1894:talk 1880:and 1862:talk 1835:talk 1810:talk 1788:talk 1758:talk 1723:talk 1708:talk 1682:talk 1652:talk 1629:talk 1614:talk 1591:talk 1520:talk 1510:and 1494:The 1480:talk 1464:talk 1372:talk 1338:talk 1308:talk 1243:here 1239:this 1194:talk 1127:talk 1052:talk 1024:talk 950:talk 883:talk 861:Note 849:talk 822:talk 812:and 755:talk 737:Hey 728:talk 706:Talk 691:talk 670:talk 661:here 651:Talk 630:talk 585:talk 555:talk 541:talk 526:talk 496:talk 475:talk 464:and 449:talk 431:and 409:that 366:talk 346:talk 330:talk 304:talk 263:talk 216:talk 186:talk 2626:or 2352:. - 2233:BJP 2145:On 1971:) 1816:) 1541:, " 1432:o g 1417:ygm 1412:or 1277:or 1103:--- 1088:). 1006:.-- 944:. - 920:1RR 804:or 608:to 600:Hi 477:) 368:) 3170:) 3148:– 3106:) 3088:) 3074:) 3059:) 3036:) 3021:) 3001:) 2972:) 2957:) 2942:) 2916:) 2908:. 2893:) 2869:) 2849:) 2820:) 2790:) 2772:) 2736:) 2712:) 2671:) 2638:) 2594:) 2563:) 2544:) 2526:, 2491:) 2468:) 2445:Mr 2360:) 2337:) 2297:) 2265:) 2247:) 2224:) 2201:) 2187:) 2172:) 2026:) 2006:) 1990:) 1986:• 1944:) 1927:) 1923:• 1896:) 1876:, 1864:) 1837:) 1812:• 1790:) 1760:• 1725:) 1710:) 1684:) 1672:: 1654:) 1631:) 1616:) 1593:) 1522:) 1482:) 1466:) 1420:}} 1414:{{ 1410:}} 1404:{{ 1374:) 1340:) 1310:) 1196:) 1129:) 1078:Tb 1054:) 1026:) 952:) 885:) 851:) 824:) 765:Hi 757:) 730:) 704:| 693:) 672:) 649:| 632:) 591:) 587:• 557:) 543:) 528:) 498:) 451:) 427:, 348:) 332:) 306:) 265:) 222:) 218:• 188:) 142:D. 137:W. 86:→ 3166:( 3102:( 3084:( 3070:( 3055:( 3032:( 3017:( 2997:( 2968:( 2953:( 2938:( 2912:( 2889:( 2865:( 2845:( 2816:( 2786:( 2768:( 2732:( 2726:: 2722:@ 2708:( 2667:( 2634:( 2590:( 2559:( 2540:( 2528:2 2524:1 2520:) 2512:) 2487:( 2464:( 2448:X 2404:4 2385:. 2356:( 2333:( 2293:( 2279:) 2261:( 2243:( 2220:( 2197:( 2183:( 2168:( 2022:( 2002:( 1982:( 1940:( 1919:( 1892:( 1860:( 1833:( 1829:- 1808:( 1786:( 1756:( 1721:( 1706:( 1696:: 1692:@ 1680:( 1650:( 1627:( 1612:( 1589:( 1577:. 1550:. 1535:: 1531:@ 1518:( 1478:( 1462:( 1438:X 1430:L 1370:( 1352:: 1348:@ 1336:( 1306:( 1250:. 1208:: 1204:@ 1192:( 1125:( 1084:( 1073:© 1050:( 1022:( 948:( 881:( 847:( 836:: 832:@ 820:( 753:( 743:: 739:@ 726:( 689:( 683:: 679:@ 668:( 628:( 606:: 602:@ 583:( 553:( 539:( 524:( 494:( 488:: 484:@ 473:( 447:( 364:( 344:( 328:( 318:: 314:@ 302:( 261:( 236:: 232:@ 214:( 184:( 118:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index