403:
17:
495:
It's actual email, but it goes through the site first to protect email address. Otherwise vandals could get people's email addresses and spam them or harrass them. If someone sends me an email through the site, I get their email address, but they don't get mine until I respond. It also prevents email
323:
I see in one of your edit summaries that you say the image is from a friend. That's fine, but please understand that
Knowledge respects the copyrights of others. We cannot use the image unless your friend will (1) confirm that he/she is the author, (2) certify that it really is Cho and (3) agree to
59:
Don't feel too rushed to add a list of victims. There is a discussion on the talk page about holding off on this until a complete list is released from the state of
Virginia or similar. This is still breaking news - there's no need to rush any one part of it. It seems like this person may have been a
380:
The fact that you can see shadows from the edge of their faces is because the lightsource is not from the camera. You are right that there is only one source... but this source is a little behind the camera. Or... it could just be an SLR camera with that silly little build flash they have. The SLR
109:
on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in
Knowledge, please note that inserting spam into Knowledge is against policy. For more information about me, see
69:
We were typing to each other at the same time. That source is borderline reliable - it is a newspaper, but it is only using the
Facebook group and one friend as a source. I would suggest taking a look at the discussion about a list of victims, and consider waiting until an official list is released
128:
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that
370:
quote: Originally posted by
Karilla Definitely photoshopped. You can see not only in the shoulder join, but also in the fact that the shadows caused by the edge of the faces are BETWEEN them. This could only be accomplished with two light sources, yet the catch-light in the eyes reveals only one
49:
Please stop including this
Facebook group in the article - the group is a non notable subgroup on a social networking site and, as such, fails several of Knowledge's core policies for inclusion. If you have a reliable source (such as a newspaper article or other official statement) confirming the
468:
If you click on my user page or user talk page, you will see a column on the bottom left that has a bunch of links. One of those links says "E-mail this user". Click it and you will get an email form to email me. Not all users have email set up, but since I'm an admin it's highly recommended.
199:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually
100:
from
Knowledge. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule facebook\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. Please read
390:
Now about the shoulders... that is also genuine. The reason being that guy on the right in simply leaning in behind guy on the left, forcing guy on the left to lean forward a bit which you can also see by his natural forward tilt of his head.
431:
First and foremost, the sourcing requirements don't apply to userpages at all. Secondly, those are awards given by other users, which can easily be verified by looking at their talk page history. Finally, please read the article
353:
People, the flash shadow of the guy on the left is to his right, and the shadow of the guy on the right is to his left. Thats not possible, hence the photo is a fake. The blends round the top of the head are a giveaway too.
449:
of the page. You can do this easily by clicking the plus sign at the top of any talk page. Also, please sign your posts by typing ~~~~ or clicking the button that says "sign your name" under the edit window. Thank you.
153:
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
433:
580:
549:
302:. Could you clarify the circumstances under which the picture was taken? Specifically, could you confirm that you, personally, are indeed the photographer and that it is not a
328:
for sample letters of request and more information. He/she can remain anonymous - that's fine - but we do need that permission to be confirmed. Can you have your friend email
240:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
203:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
583:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
552:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
394:
The shade in lefthand corner is a photographers mistake... simply from not paying attention. I even do that once in every 1000 shots... so no biggy there.
325:
200:
sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
253:
27:. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Knowledge without a good reason, which should be specified in the
249:
50:
death of this person, you are free to re-add their name to the victim's list. Thank you, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask.
485:
Just FYI, I'm going offline in a minute, so if you email me I won't answer until tomorrow. I have an early class, so I need to get to bed.
269:
207:
234:
230:
224:
157:
384:
This in turn means... the amount of the wall that the light source can "see" is smaller than what the camera can see.
357:
Found this on the net about more on this topic, in response to others who believe this photo could be "photo shopped"
530:
517:
303:
137:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
545:
273:
23:
Welcome to
Knowledge. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from
35:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
333:
527:
514:
86:
24:
150:
111:
576:
195:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
191:
183:
324:
release the image under a free license - either into the public domain or under the GFDL. Please see
289:
282:
134:
590:
559:
341:
311:
115:
414:
410:
257:
218:
497:
486:
470:
460:
451:
437:
422:
71:
61:
51:
40:
36:
32:
28:
381:
lens would still have a greater field of view than that small flash they have as standart.
296:
173:
142:
106:
169:
165:
97:
364:
posted on 21-4-2007 @ 06:19 AM (ID:3133291, Post Number: 3,033,401) single this post
263:
172:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --
161:
156:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
130:
102:
246:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
584:
553:
418:
337:
307:
196:
133:, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please
507:
445:
Also, when you post on someone's talk page, please put your post on the
402:
16:
149:
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on
387:
I know this for a fact... practical everyday experience from my job.
306:
of a news media photo, facebook photo, or any such thing? Thanks. --
92:
Thank you for contributing to
Knowledge, Uifz! However, your edit
596:
565:
533:
520:
500:
489:
473:
463:
454:
440:
425:
347:
317:
276:
214:
176:
118:
74:
64:
54:
43:
105:
for more information. If the link was to an image, please read
401:
135:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
15:
288:
I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, but you tagged
96:
was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
434:
Knowledge:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
241:
93:
332:
with the above information? Optionally, you can just
237:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
575:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
544:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
526:Thanks for the response and welcome to wikipedia!
268:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
129:subject should be included in Knowledge. Under the
217:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at
60:friend of yours; if so, I'm sorry for your loss.
540:Image:Danbury_fair_mall.jpg listed for deletion
8:
496:addresses from being harvested by spambots.
377:That's poor reasoning... no offence meant
513:where did you get this picture? Thanks!
326:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission
213:tag can be used to release it under the
581:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
550:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
231:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use
571:Image:Sheaview.jpg listed for deletion
252:. If the image is copyrighted under a
7:
409:Please do not introduce any form of
330:permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org
229:or one of the other tags listed at
14:
336:and I can pass it on. Thanks. --
103:Knowledge's external links policy
266:after 03:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
417:of other users, as you did to
270:Media copyright questions page
235:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1:
250:criteria for speedy deletion
131:criteria for speedy deletion
546:Image:Danbury_fair_mall.jpg
612:
597:17:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
566:17:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
534:05:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
521:17:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
501:04:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
490:04:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
474:04:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
464:04:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
455:04:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
441:04:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
426:04:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
348:04:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
318:03:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
277:03:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
262:the image will be deleted
177:03:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
119:03:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
107:Knowledge's image tutorial
75:03:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
65:03:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
55:03:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
44:02:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
208:GFDL-self-no-disclaimers
182:Unspecified source for
151:the article's talk page
406:
87:Virginia Tech massacre
70:by state authorities.
25:Virginia Tech massacre
20:
579:, has been listed at
548:, has been listed at
405:
189:Thanks for uploading
31:. Take a look at the
19:
225:Non-free fair use in
221:, use a tag such as
274:Resurgent insurgent
85:Regarding edits to
577:Image:Sheaview.jpg
407:
258:Knowledge:Fair use
248:, as described on
219:Knowledge:Fair use
192:Image:Chovtech.jpg
184:Image:Chovtech.jpg
21:
603:
593:
587:
562:
556:
344:
314:
301:
295:
290:Image:Cho101.jpg
283:Image:Cho101.jpg
254:non-free license
228:
212:
206:
148:
147:
141:
611:
610:
606:
605:
604:
602:
601:
600:
591:
585:
573:
560:
554:
542:
511:
400:
342:
312:
304:derivative work
299:
293:
286:
227:|article name}}
222:
210:
204:
187:
158:for biographies
145:
139:
138:
126:
90:
12:
11:
5:
609:
607:
572:
569:
541:
538:
537:
536:
510:
508:Chomarines.jpg
505:
504:
503:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
399:
396:
374:
367:
363:
351:
350:
285:
280:
186:
180:
125:
122:
89:
83:
82:
81:
80:
79:
78:
77:
39:. Thank you.
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
608:
599:
598:
594:
588:
582:
578:
570:
568:
567:
563:
557:
551:
547:
539:
535:
532:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
519:
516:
509:
506:
502:
499:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
475:
472:
467:
466:
465:
462:
458:
457:
456:
453:
448:
444:
443:
442:
439:
435:
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
421:. Thank you.
420:
416:
412:
404:
397:
395:
392:
388:
385:
382:
378:
375:
372:
368:
365:
361:
358:
355:
349:
345:
339:
335:
331:
327:
322:
321:
320:
319:
315:
309:
305:
298:
291:
284:
281:
279:
278:
275:
272:. Thank you.
271:
267:
265:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
236:
232:
226:
220:
216:
209:
201:
198:
194:
193:
185:
181:
179:
178:
175:
171:
170:for companies
167:
163:
162:for web sites
159:
154:
152:
144:
136:
132:
124:Notability of
123:
121:
120:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
88:
84:
76:
73:
68:
67:
66:
63:
58:
57:
56:
53:
48:
47:
46:
45:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
18:
574:
543:
512:
484:
459:No problem.
446:
408:
393:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:
373:
369:
366:
362:
359:
356:
352:
329:
287:
261:
245:
239:
202:
190:
188:
155:
127:
91:
33:welcome page
29:edit summary
22:
174:EarthPerson
112:my FAQ page
419:User:Vsion
398:User:Vsion
114:. Thanks!
528:El hombre
515:El hombre
415:userpages
411:vandalism
242:this link
197:copyright
166:for bands
116:Shadowbot
371:flash.
334:email me
264:48 hours
531:de haha
518:de haha
498:Natalie
487:Natalie
471:Natalie
461:Natalie
452:Natalie
438:Natalie
423:Natalie
413:to the
360:flice
297:PD-self
260:) then
72:Natalie
62:Natalie
52:Natalie
41:Natalie
37:sandbox
447:bottom
233:. See
143:hangon
586:BigDT
555:BigDT
338:BigDT
308:BigDT
292:with
256:(per
168:, or
215:GFDL
98:spam
94:here
592:416
561:416
343:416
313:416
595:)
564:)
436:.
346:)
316:)
300:}}
294:{{
244:.
223:{{
211:}}
205:{{
164:,
160:,
146:}}
140:{{
589:(
558:(
340:(
310:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
