User talk:Universal Cereal Bus

1436: 1549:

them laugh at me now, the ignorant swine! :) I'm in bloody Knowledge! Where the hell are they? Soon the world will bow down to my genius! (Insert evil laugh). Anyway, Cereal Dude, I took the liberty of de-mammothising your task. I corrected a couple of things (Damn man, I'm old but not that old!) I added some career highlights and attempted to put things in a chronological order. I hope I did it in the correct Knowledge way. Cheers! RS

4279: 4179: 4096: 3583: 3798: 3742: 1231: 36: 3291: 2111: 2069: 3849: 3643: 3353: 2217: 4004: 2177: 2318: 1622: 1063: 122: 885:, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at 1774: 2418: 678: 3519: 3602:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1586: 1858: 1548:

Hello, Universal Cereal Bus-- I'm Ralph Schuckett, subject of the stub you created. I'm the mammoth task himself. In the flesh. Thanks for the stub! I've never had a stub before, though I do stub a toe now and then. Thanks to you, from now on my name shall be immortal. Now they'll all see! Let's hear

844:

I'm fairly fluent in Spanish, so I'll tell you a couple things about this article. 1.) You're right about "autorpmoción" (self promotion = advertisement). 2.) The article begins "Puerta del Sol is more than a band...", and even though I don't know a few of the words, it seems to be a big PR piece for

2380:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

945:

Hi. I am wondering if you would be able to discuss with me the reason for your CSD decline under G11 of this article. I tagged it as G11 since it was blatant advertising, and read like a resume, including the guy's phone number. It was also created by the subject of the article, and was therefore

1680:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

1121:

991:

It wasn't the TV newsreader bit I was concerned about; that is notable, yes. It was the fact that the guy created his own article, included his telephone number, details of the jobs he did and it read like a posted resumé. That was why I G11'd it... I figured it would be better to get it off than

265:

My apologies then. Do you have any references for the claim he worked with DJ? And a quick note; firstly, if you're aware of the deletion policy and what is/isn't deletable by CSD/AfD you should have been able to create pages that fulfilled the keep criterion (although I appreciate it was done in a

180:

94:

4059:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1183:

covers a lot of ground and I don't know. Do you know if a better photo exists? Do you think this article should go on Knowledge's main page for "Did you know..."? I'll take a break for a while so you can get at the article. Sorry didn't mean to tie it up. Best wishes and thank you for both the

1289:

Thank you for your expression of confidence, but I must decline. I like writing articles, reverting vandalism, and patrolling the new pages, but I don't want the extra tools right now. I've found that I can contribute to Knowledge in the ways that I want to without being an admin. Thanks,

3463:

article has been reverted because it contains false info. While it does contain three songs issued as singles, two of them are NOT the same versions found on the album. So only the single with "The Long and Winding Road" and the B-side "For You Blue" is the one taken from the

1744:

I'd like to take a minute to let you know that I appreciate your support in my recently-closed RfA, which passed with a count of 56 in support, 7 in opposition, and 2 neutrals. I'll certainly try to justify your faith by using the tools wisely. Happy editing, and thanks again!

1314: 1441:

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you.

1363: 818:

because from your comments at its AFD, it appears that you don't know what the article says. I don't speak Spanish, so I don't know either, but we need to know whether or not it actually qualifies for spedy deletion. As you have also put it up for

3824:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3768:

16:

This is my talk page. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). If you're going to delete my page, please put it under the heading "I'm Deleting Your Page". If you're blocking me, please put it under "You're Blocked". For anything else,

1595:, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. 2332:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 628:

of Knowledge's deletion policies which could validly be used to propose its removal. CSD tagging is a very important part of Knowledge and it is great that you are wanting to be involved however I would propose that you read up on the

566:

And per your comments on the Village Pump, I wouldn't put too much stock in the whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" thing. As with real world politics, the majority of people here are closer to the middle than one of the extreme ends.

2382: 1682: 1123: 182: 96: 1976:

for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of

823:, it's probably best just to let that pan out, and hopefully someone who speaks Spanish can shed some light. Apologies if I have the wrong end of the stick and you have translated it, I'm just going from your comments at the AFD. -- 1530:

Yeah, my edits were a little confusing. My edit summary was limited by the maximum length of the field. I should have posted a note on both talk pages explaining what I was doing, instead of just posting one to the alternate.

136:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 341:

Good enough for me! :). You might want to go over your created articles list and check they all work with the notability guidelines; a quick overview by me shows that the ones on Stan Lee and Simon Law, for example, dont.

946:

biographical, and did not assert notability. I chose G11 over db-bio, since it was clearly an advert for the guy and his work. Your comments are welcome, please reply here as I now have your page on watchlist. Cheers,

754:(which I created), under criterion A7. I feel that the article had significant claim to notability, saying that they had a #6 hit in England. In my opinion, the article was plenty significant enough to be on Knowledge. 2904: 3828:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

3772:

2837: 2703: 2569: 3958:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2502: 2770: 2636: 2971: 3038: 1489:

Hi, sorry about reverting your edits. I was trying to protect your account from what I suspected might be an impersonator. I'll revert the message I posted at the alternate account, if you haven't already.

3105: 1808: 2240:"If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, primarily containing contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step" 1636:, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1077:, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 50:, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 681:

Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. Specifically, you copied the contents of

633:

before you tag any more articles otherwise you just end up making more work for administrators. If you need any help or advice please don't hesitate to drop by my talk page. The very best of luck,

2046:

Hey Sorry. I guess I thought I replied! I'm not sure why I nominated that article for A7. It was probably an accident that I didn't fix properly. Looking at it now, it's definitely not a speedy.

2186:. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Knowledge. You can join 2033:| to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies 571:, and editors who see things in terms of ideologies like "deletionism vs. inclusionism" rather than policy and common sense tend not to last too long here. Again, welcome to Knowledge from 1204: 820: 1505:

Okay, I can see your reasoning behind that, given that the name is perilously close to my actual name. But in your edit summary, I think you should put your reasoning. Thanks anyway,

1467:. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on 731:. Also, please be sure to start discussion on relevent talk pages before making moves except in the most obvious cases (such as a page just created at a typo). Hope this helps, -- 1399:

Hello Universal Cereal Bus. Good to see you took my advice at bay. Yes, it is much better and it is no longer visually aggressive. Although I could still suggest that you choose a

2898: 2831: 2697: 2563: 2496: 2764: 2630: 2965: 3032: 706: 1961: 723:

Hi. Never try to "move" a page by copy and pasting. This creates multiple problems. It loses article history (who wrote what), an essential part of the Knowledge

3099: 1788:. Only joking, thank you for your support, i promise i will try not to let you all down, come find me on my talk page if you ever need my help with anything -- 992:

have it stay there. Still, I note you Prodded it, and that is ok. I was just confused as to why the speedy was declined. Feel free to post anymore views. :)

1867:, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community. 882: 4153:

If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

3821: 3765: 1147: 444: 3490: 1512: 502: 2276:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

3810: 3754: 2187: 1592: 1258:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 889:- please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! 705:

to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at

881:, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Knowledge, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at 4037: 1464: 2430: 383:

Yeah, maybe you're right. I'll try to find out more about these people to see if they match the notability criteria then. Thanks for the advice,

4040:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

4342: 4242: 4041: 4033: 3993: 3912: 3706: 3614: 3428: 2307: 2281: 558: 3983: 1864: 4128: 2012: 914: 2402: 1565: 1448: 4127:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

4064:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 2183: 2246: 399: 319: 251: 2919: 4346: 4246: 3979: 3916: 3710: 3432: 2285: 2250: 1946: 2886: 2852: 2718: 2447: 1017:

has taken up the challenge of creating a larger userbox than the one posted on your Userpage. If you would like to view his

905: 2584: 2819: 2685: 2517: 1985:

to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the

2785: 2651: 2551: 2341: 524: 145: 2986: 2484: 701:

at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at

4013: 3053: 2752: 2618: 1755: 1645: 1603: 1086: 689:, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to 519: 59: 3970:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2953: 4334: 4290: 4268: 4234: 4190: 4168: 3975: 3904: 3860: 3698: 3654: 3632: 3598:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3420: 3364: 3342: 3020: 2345: 2224: 1134: 931: 433: 172: 3120: 1989:

and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply

1018: 4338: 4238: 4061: 3908: 3702: 3603: 3424: 3087: 2880: 1781:

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which recently passed unanimously. Unfortunately, you have been indefinitely

1259: 3814: 3758: 3685: 3485: 3181: 3165: 3157: 2254: 1782: 1507: 962: 868: 755: 714: 702: 649: 529: 448: 4321: 2813: 2679: 4020: 3201: 2545: 2455: 800: 620:

is certainly not in the list and is never likely to be. Secondly the article is and was a perfectly acceptable

2876: 2478: 2437:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure

2231:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 815: 2746: 2612: 4258: 4158: 4143: 3177: 2947: 2005: 1994: 1640:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 1081:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 140:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 54:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 4286: 4272: 3209: 3014: 2809: 2675: 1377:

To Universal Cereal Bus, who earned at least two barnstars for help with a musician's article. Thank you.

1113: 3594: 2541: 2396: 2386: 2137: 2092: 1704:

Hi. I wouldn't worry too much about editcount at this stage. It's more quality than quantity that counts.

1561: 1446: 1230: 927: 829: 736: 685:. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's 509: 498: 429: 212: 166: 129: 115: 4056: 4029: 3997: 2926: 2474: 2147: 3473: 3081: 2742: 2608: 1410: 1253: 1246: 1212: 1174: 617: 536: 4298:

This piece does not establish notability, let alone with two sources. Should be a draft if not deleted.

2943: 1557: 697:

from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the

223:- look at the history to see how bad it was. As a consequence, I failed to mention that he worked with 3010: 2859: 2725: 4221: 4045: 3650: 3636: 3257: 3229: 2591: 2337: 1897: 1641: 1553: 1382: 1341: 1332:'s article being undeleted, then nominated for DYK, and on the occasion of it reaching the Knowledge 1274: 1189: 1155: 1082: 893: 710: 540: 394: 389: 314: 309: 246: 241: 141: 86: 55: 2524: 2182:

Hello, Universal Cereal Bus. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the

4358: 4350: 4250: 4132: 3971: 3920: 3722: 3714: 3566: 3558: 3436: 3412: 3389: 3169: 3113: 3077: 3046: 2979: 2912: 2845: 2792: 2778: 2711: 2658: 2644: 2577: 2510: 2289: 2262: 2158: 1997:

and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :)

1435: 850: 796: 552: 544: 354: 278: 235:

lack of notability. So the article could have been deleted under PROD or AfD, but not CSD. Thanks,

197: 3891: 2993: 2269:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1136: 1041: 4254: 4154: 4075: 3928: 3060: 2445:. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2442: 2372: 2270: 1998: 1879: 1793: 1536: 1495: 1291: 901: 728: 698: 694: 579: 514: 505:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 216: 3311: 2892: 2351:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1651:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1107: 1092:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1070: 1056: 551:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 151:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

65:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

19:

You're allowed to personally attack me, and I won't revert it. Go ahead, give me all you want.

4317: 4217: 4111: 4107: 4085: 3947: 3938: 3887: 3873:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3834: 3778: 3681: 3667:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3622: 3397: 3272: 3127: 2867: 2438: 2390: 2297: 2133: 2088: 1969: 1839: 1730: 1468: 1443: 1173:! Do you have a copy of Jim Walsh's book? My copy isn't with me at the moment. Do you know if 1045: 1026: 997: 951: 824: 732: 3557:

For your attentive move to delete what must have looked utterly improbable under the heading

219:

in a hurry, which explains the horrible (and I mean horrible) quality of the initial page of

4103: 4089: 3967: 3951: 3469: 3329: 3225: 3185: 2825: 2691: 1751: 1601: 1415: 1295: 1208: 568: 3966:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2557: 4186: 4172: 3540: 3440: 2490: 2356: 2030: 1882: 1690: 1656: 1378: 1337: 1270: 1185: 1151: 1132: 1097: 886: 846: 751: 384: 304: 236: 156: 80: 70: 43: 29: 2758: 2624: 2959: 1815:. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, 4354: 3963: 3955: 3718: 3562: 3221: 3026: 2800: 2666: 2277: 2198: 2176: 2154: 1986: 1903: 1811:

to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the

1400: 1313: 1179: 977: 878: 780: 621: 463: 343: 267: 231:

notability is not covered by CSD. This argument would work at AfD, but CSD is only for

224: 220: 186: 104: 4362: 4262: 4162: 4079: 3987: 3932: 3838: 3782: 3726: 3626: 3570: 3544: 3503: 3477: 3447: 3336: 3276: 2406: 2301: 2202: 2162: 2141: 2096: 2054: 2019: 1931: 1843: 1824: 1797: 1762: 1734: 1694: 1605: 1569: 1540: 1525: 1499: 1479: 1450: 1421: 1386: 1345: 1299: 1278: 1216: 1193: 1159: 1049: 1030: 1001: 982: 955: 859: 834: 804: 784: 769: 740: 718: 663: 639: 591: 468: 437: 404: 362: 324: 286: 256: 205: 108: 35: 4304: 4204: 4116: 4071: 3959: 3924: 3874: 3668: 3529: 3401: 3378: 3301: 3249: 3213: 3193: 3161: 2532: 2434: 2422: 2370:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2366: 2344:. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the 2333: 2329: 2325: 2311: 2237: 2228: 2121: 2079: 1978: 1927: 1907: 1870: 1816: 1789: 1672: 1670:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1637: 1633: 1532: 1491: 1403:

on "Special", as I find it a bit harder to read against a white background. Regards,

1111:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1078: 1074: 897: 693:

it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a

630: 609: 573: 426: 170:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 137: 133: 84:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 51: 47: 3352: 3093: 2216: 1960:

Universal Cereal Bus, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent

624:

i.e. one of the basic building blocks of this encyclopaedia and there is nothing in

3830: 3774: 3618: 3599: 3268: 3217: 2465: 2293: 1982: 1836: 1726: 1718: 1473: 1237: 1169:

Greetings, Universal Cereal Bus. You're the one who found he'd been deleted! Thank

1022: 1014: 993: 947: 605: 604:

Hi there. Just to let you know that I have declined your speedy deletion request on

598: 3290: 2110: 2068: 686: 3377:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

877:

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at

4303:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

4203:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

4136: 4121: 4060:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4032: