632:). To answer your second question, yes, the reviewer must have some knowledge of the article if you want to do some serious screening. The approval is a bit loose, basically we are just looking to make sure it doesn't violate any policies on biographies, it's not a copyright violation and it's not anything simply wacky. To answer your fourth question, it doesn't bug me about multiple edits; the reviewing button handles all of that. Hope that answers your questions! Cheers.
470:
31:
342:. From the history page and the edit filter tags thereon I assumed it was a sock of Rob buns and you were just reverting the addition of material. But yeah, a bit more haste and a little less speed in reacting on my part would have helped &ndash looking at the size of the article edits, or a diff of your edits, would have stopped me blowing a molehill into a mountain. Thank you for your very reasonable reply too.
365:
649:
529:
146:
Well, it is a theorem, whether or not it sounds silly or essay-like. I would like it if it was it's own page, but if that doesn't comply with you, then I guess leave it under my namespace or whatever. In my defense, it's source is me - the creator, just like any other theorem and it has to be proven
150:
EDIT: sorry, I was dodging the bullet with that response. What I meant was that if the article doesn't comply with wikipedia's rules, then this is fine, but if it does comply, I see no reason for having it moved to a user page essay (as I don't see it as an essay). Hope this was a bit more clear.
627:
It's not hard at all to approve an edit; only users with the reviewer right like me can do it and all I have to is click a button. This reviewing process is done on certain articles that are protected in a special way (I really don't want to explain it unless you want a lecture, read about it
604:
4. How much does it bug you to get multiple edits in a row. (I find myself needing them copyediting or content creating.) It's just too hard to try do the the stuff offline and load finished copy, for one thing because of wiki code and lack of a sandbox for an IP anyhow.
713:
edit on my watchlist, hit rollback and went to the user's talk to issue a warning. I did not see your warning when I posted. I'll be glad to answer your questions if you post them to my talk...no need to hide them in your edit summaries.
573:
Thanks for the reminder, but I don't see any collaboration opinions or any active discussion on the talk page of the article. Maybe you could tell me about on things that need to get done so that I can
179:
OK maybe I was using the term "essay" too loosely. My point is the tone/style of a actually theorem full-out stating of a theorem/idea is not the style we are looking for on
Knowledge. Read
126:-
542:
There's plenty to do, and goals on the talk pageâall members are encouraged to participate. Additionally, collaboration participants will receive a barnstar after the article reaches
601:
3. Is the apprval loose (just screening vandalism) or tight (maintaining the beautiful clean copyediting extant in wikipedia)? I think I know the answer to that one...hehe!
487:
507:
283:
should not be used to avoid 3RR. At this point I am making no accusations, just posting the same message on all editors' talk pages. Per
410:
612:
325:
Futhermore I think you got the wrong person; I have no idea what you are talking about; I was just reverting obvious vandalism by
419:
167:
662:
660:
has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
691:
304:
403:
38:
292:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
99:
95:
77:
63:
671:
598:
2. Does the approver have some general knowledge of the category of articles? Or just a responsible person?
314:
Edit warring? Um, all I was doing was reverting vandalism on that article; look at the diffs and you will see.
347:
687:
616:
300:
453:
722:
629:
608:
280:
210:
155:
223:
Awesome. I really don't understand why random people try to write their autobiography on
Knowledge.
667:
163:
563:
343:
326:
257:
184:
502:
657:
535:
476:
469:
429:
296:
288:
245:
445:
715:
550:
203:
51:
17:
249:
235:
575:
399:
159:
287:, a controversial edit should be discussed on the talk page, not become subject to an
559:
387:
380:
284:
276:
253:
180:
666:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
592:
first time, I have gone through this sort of approval. wonder how you think of it.
543:
376:
272:
549:
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in
364:
546:
status. If you have a spare moment, please join in or tell your friends. Thanks!
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
729:
695:
677:
636:
620:
581:
567:
514:
483:
458:
351:
333:
318:
308:
261:
227:
217:
191:
171:
147:
correct - by anyone willing to do so. And besides, they can edit it, right? :)
648:
633:
578:
539:
338:
Sorry, I went a bit over the top on that, went all "OMG A BLP VIOLATION" over
330:
315:
224:
188:
43:
202:
Don't waste any further time; I've reported him as a promotional username.
371:
Hello, per your request, I've granted you
Rollback rights! Just remember:
497:
392:
Having
Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
684:
528:
248:
process only applies to living people. You added a BLPPROD tag to
653:
252:, but it was clear from the article that he was from the 1600s.
395:
Misuse of
Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
523:
25:
538:! We're currently working on the project's flagship article,
595:
1. Is it a pain in the ass (for approvers, for editors)?
490:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
468:
363:
383:, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
375:
Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including
710:
703:
339:
440:If you have any questions, please do let me know.
295:and encourage you to join the conversation at
520:Please help with the Apple Inc. collaboration
8:
406:to get to know the workings of the feature
475:Hello, Usb10. You have new messages at
588:thanks for approving the Shawn copyedit
536:WikiProject Apple Inc.'s collaboration
291:. I have notified the BLP noticeboard
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
534:Hi there! I'd like to invite you to
411:Knowledge:New admin school/Rollback
244:I just want to remind you that the
275:article. I would like you to read
24:
647:
527:
29:
1:
730:16:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
696:00:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
678:02:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
658:Did You Know nominations page
637:01:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
621:01:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
582:01:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
568:03:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
386:Rollback is only for blatant
271:You appear to be editing the
515:14:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
484:14:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
459:23:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
415:You may wish to display the
352:01:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
334:00:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
319:00:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
309:10:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
267:Edit warring at Dan Benishek
262:20:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
228:23:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
218:23:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
192:01:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
172:01:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
94:
745:
652:Hello! Your submission of
435:top icon on your user page
404:Knowledge:Rollback feature
455:Penny for your thoughts?
409:You can test Rollback at
42:of past discussions with
663:your nomination's entry
643:DYK nomination of Kadua
420:User wikipedia/rollback
187:section of it. Cheers.
89:
76:
69:
62:
683:Left more comments at
551:WikiProject Apple Inc.
473:
368:
142:Wiki Loop Theorem idea
472:
367:
477:Ale jrb's talk page
425:userbox and/or the
488:remove this notice
474:
369:
688:Materialscientist
676:
611:comment added by
557:
556:
553:
301:Mechanical digger
297:Talk:Dan Benishek
183:, especially the
175:
158:comment added by
133:
132:
85:
84:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
736:
726:
719:
675:
651:
623:
548:
531:
524:
513:
510:
505:
500:
491:
456:
450:
434:
428:
424:
418:
215:
208:
198:Ryan Mileti Ros5
174:
152:
129:
87:
86:
80:
74:
66:
60:
59:
33:
32:
26:
744:
743:
739:
738:
737:
735:
734:
733:
724:
717:
707:
674:
645:
606:
590:
522:
508:
503:
498:
495:
492:
481:
466:
454:
446:
432:
426:
422:
416:
362:
269:
239:
211:
204:
200:
153:
144:
128:... (up to 100)
127:
79:Archive 4 : -->
78:
70:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Usb10
12:
11:
5:
742:
740:
706:
700:
699:
698:
670:
668:The Bushranger
644:
641:
640:
639:
589:
586:
585:
584:
555:
554:
547:
532:
521:
518:
482:Message added
480:
467:
465:
462:
442:
441:
437:
436:
413:
407:
400:Help:Reverting
396:
393:
390:
384:
361:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
322:
321:
281:WP:SOCKPUPPETs
279:and note that
268:
265:
238:
232:
231:
230:
199:
196:
195:
194:
143:
140:
138:
135:
131:
130:
93:
83:
82:
75:
68:
65:< Archive 2
56:
55:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
741:
732:
731:
728:
727:
721:
720:
712:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:
682:
681:
680:
679:
673:
669:
665:
664:
659:
655:
650:
642:
638:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
622:
618:
614:
610:
602:
599:
596:
593:
587:
583:
580:
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
552:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
526:
525:
519:
517:
516:
512:
511:
506:
501:
489:
485:
478:
471:
463:
461:
460:
457:
451:
449:
439:
438:
431:
421:
414:
412:
408:
405:
401:
397:
394:
391:
389:
385:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
366:
359:
353:
349:
345:
344:Bigger digger
341:
337:
336:
335:
332:
328:
324:
323:
320:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
299:. Thank you,
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
266:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
214:
209:
207:
197:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
148:
141:
139:
136:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
81:
73:
67:
61:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
723:
716:
708:
661:
646:
613:72.82.43.222
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
558:
496:
493:
447:
443:
398:Please read
370:
273:Dan Benishek
270:
250:GudÅ Toshoku
243:
240:
236:GudÅ Toshoku
212:
205:
201:
149:
145:
137:
134:
103:
90:
71:
47:
37:
672:Return fire
448:HJÂ Mitchell
234:BLPPROD of
185:WP:NOTESSAY
154:âPreceding
36:This is an
607:âPreceding
576:hack away?
540:Apple Inc.
486:. You can
289:WP:EDITWAR
246:WP:BLPPROD
91:All Pages:
388:vandalism
340:this diff
160:Jesseoffy
72:Archive 3
704:question
702:Re:your
609:unsigned
560:Monomium
464:Talkback
430:Rollback
360:Rollback
327:this guy
254:Calathan
168:contribs
156:unsigned
714:Regards
656:at the
504:Science
39:archive
709:I saw
685:T:TDYK
377:Huggle
285:WP:BRD
277:WP:3RR
213:Shadow
181:WP:NOT
725:rolls
654:Kadua
634:Usb10
579:Usb10
499:Nerdy
381:Igloo
331:Usb10
316:Usb10
225:Usb10
189:Usb10
44:Usb10
16:<
718:Tide
711:this
692:talk
630:here
617:talk
564:talk
509:Dude
402:and
379:and
348:talk
305:talk
293:here
258:talk
241:Hi,
206:Half
164:talk
122:-
118:-
114:-
110:-
106:-
102:-
98:-
694:)
619:)
566:)
544:GA
452:|
444:--
433:}}
427:{{
423:}}
417:{{
350:)
307:)
260:)
170:)
46:.
690:(
615:(
562:(
494:~
479:.
346:(
329:.
303:(
256:(
166:â¢
162:(
124:8
120:7
116:6
112:5
108:4
104:3
100:2
96:1
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.