User talk:VS6507/Archive 3 - Knowledge (XXG)

321:. YouTube is not one of these and tends to get removed, as does Facebook. College and university team sites are also not independent, but you might get away with one that has a factual section covering the topic in more detail than just referring to their own teams. Over to Alex who will explain why he reverted you. I would reckon that you shouldn't make any article edits that are not objective (they WILL be reverted), and that you should be sure to get the RS in. 513: 57:

I could go into detail and describe the different cocktails which are all named after events related to horses, such as horses neck, stinger, old fashioned, and the cocktail itself. All early literature prior to 1800 specifically denotes a cocktail as a "half breed" racing horse, so you want me to type that all out, or just leave it at "The word cocktail very likely derives from the half breed racing mare." I am a very busy man, I encourage you to be kinder.

2671: 1871: 1630: 738: 717:

that the image of the animal's body is similar to ctenophores depicted in biology textbooks. But you evidently did not. So I went to the trouble of asking John to confirm my view, and he does. I don't know how to attach our emails to this form, but if you give me an email address I can reply with the attachment. Since you blocked me from further edits as a vandal, I hope that you will edit it to reflect the truth about the creature.

2798: 373:

Chapmantown and my afternoon's work here clarified the history and geography of the term Chapmantown. Most people do confuse the areas I have distinguished here, so your item is a wonderful opportunity to inform people. If your concern is a matter of tone, I would be happy to correct that. If you can help me identify any other part of my essay that troubles you, please alert me and I will be happy to cooperate.

1471: 2359: 2317: 821: 2078:

Lundberg's first wife Melody Lord Lundberg. Now i do not care how many contributions you have made to wikipedia.com but i find that, this edit was a mistake and i suggest that you fix it. if you don't i will take matters into my own hands and fix it myself and once the information is back i trust and hope that you leave this article alone. If you are not aware by now i am

2106: 293:

more substantial to the over all article. My final edit will be approximately three times as long and more descriptive and not as objective as the edit you undid. For my wiki class I was required to unload a little summary of my article that is why it looked as it did. This article will be substantial when I am done, but thank you for your concerns.

2713: 1792: 35:

the company, or approved by the company as an entirety. The segment does not pertain to the article and does not contain fully factual information. Knowledge (XXG) is an online encyclopedia and I believe we are all here and editing to come closer to the truth; therefore, I do not see any value in posting inaccurate information.

1590:. You are correct, i will remove the Facebook link. I do not think though the article needs to be reverted to its original state since this content has no source and is clearly full of marketing BS. Please advise - we can go to the article's talk page maybe? Regards 172.56.16.197 (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 292:

I am in a wikipedia class at the University of Memphis and I am required to make or write on an article already on wikipedia. I cheer for the university and am very knowledgeable about the topic. The edit you undid was not my final article and I was actually adding more too the sub article to make it

34:

After reviewing the article and doing my own research on the topic, I have found that several of the claimed lawsuits did not happen. Although Corbin Fisher did go through great efforts to fight copyright infringement, the frivolous comments made on fighting copyright infringement were not done so by

1556:

All corrections I made on Pliva are correct. We have new CEO (Tihomir Tim Orešković), also Pliva is not part of TAPI (only API manufacturing site in Savski Marof is part of TAPI Croatia which is part of TAPI but TAPI Croatia is in same time under Pliva's CEO Tim Orešković) I work in Pliva at one of

936:

It was fairly obvious from the first edit that LungiMayte was trying to create a redirect and didn't know how. From there it spiraled out of control because no one looked at what was going on, they just saw the page blanking. Now he's at a level 3 warning for no good reason. I've let him know how to

916:

I am the sister of emma Mackenzie and she was the dads leslie whitneys partner and was sentenced a day earlier due to childcare arrangements in the court, the nappy bag drug barons etc was based on my sister, as it was meant to be herself who smuggled drugs, there is references to her but she is not

600:

I am afraid people have to know of the continuous changes in this severe serial killer case. I was tasked with spreading the word. It is classified who gave me this mission. But I can tell you now. That unless you retract your speedy deletion nomination or show me a point in the terms and conditions

56:

Re: cocktail You felt my contribution weighs little. Perhaps, the very probable explanation of the origin of the word cocktail, which has been a mystery for over 150 years, has little constructive bearing. I could show you 15 different 18th century references that predate the 1803 and 1806, Maybe

1055:

Keep a note of it - it's unreferenced. Too long without launching = FAKEARTICLE. Launch without refs = prod BLP. Spammy stuff has to include I or we, or phone numbers, or PR speak. BTW I got your problem dealt with by oversight. I'm not sure if it's within the scope of the admin - but it definitely

696:

page. The figure I removed is wrong (check RFC 6241 if you want) and the text was not correct either. Since there is also an SVG of the image, I do not see why an additional ASCII art is needed. I have a fixed version of the SVG image but I do not yet have upload rights. Can you please put my edits

104:

as an "unexplained page blanking". In general, for a new article that has only be substantively edited by a single author, especially when the article has been tagged for speedy deletion for some reason (copyvio, in this case), if the article author blanks the page, we can interpret that as a good

716:

I would like to send you an email from John Bair who was interviewed for Making of Europa Report, which you used to undo my edits. In his email, John said that a ctenophore really was the primary source for designing the creature. I was hoping you and others would simply look at the film and see

414:

Either way, it doesn't matter. You should've read AfD rules, where is said that you shouldn't rename the article until the process is over (that's just making more job for admins). The article should stay, that's your opinion, but the final decision is not up to you, than to a community through a

2406:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

2077:

Regarding your recent change to Mark Lundberg i do, in fact think you have made a mistake because i am a child of Mark Lundberg and I believe that that is constructive information I can Give you the names of my half sisters if you would like to include them because they are the children of Mark

316:

With all due respect to whoever 'required' you, you can't write a new article on a subject we already have - but it looks like you are adding to an existing article. Without having any knowledge of the subject myself (we don't really have cheerleaders over here except for the few teams playing

643:

Yesterday. I was appauled. I spent at least an hour on that work. That's an hour of my life i'll never get back. Oh and there will be severe consequences, is not a threat simply an outburst of justice. For example. If you do delete my page. Perhaps the severe consequences might be any edit or

239:

regarding your reversion in this player/manager's article, i don't doubt your best intentions and judgement, but my edit was 100% correct. Please allow it to remain, this situation (my edits as anon being reverted) seems to occur more often then not even though i never: 1 - vandalize; 2 - add

372:

Dear Aleksa, I wondered where all my work went! Glad there is an active editor. I am a much published local historian and have written a biography of A.H. Chapman and live (and today write you)in the earlier Chapmantown. My purpose is not at all hostile. I was delighted to happen on the term

2323:

I know this is terribly late but I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your participation at my RfA. While you did not support my nomination, I still appreciated your participation in the process. I look forward to the opportunity to work together in the days to come. Best wishes,

1935:

I'll send it after thinking it over a little bit more. I don't mind you seeing my email address; the point is that I'd simply rather conduct business on-wiki unless it wouldn't be appropriate. Of course a longer answer will need email, but I figured that this wouldn't.

407:

and also, learn the rules regarding nominating articles for deletion.....Its a well referenced, well sourced article of a person that passes NOTABILITY, nearly 9000 views now..It doesn't matter what the outcomes of the AfD is, even if deleted, it will be re-created as it

1742:. Yeah, you're right, it was too hasty revert. Appearantly, I hurried up a little with that revert, because Huggle showed a red icon indicating that the edit was likely to be a vandalism, maybe because the concerning user has recently been blocked. Thanks for heads up! 194:

I have undid the revert done to your edit and requested speedy deletion under the G7 criteria. Since you blanked the page, it's a self-request for deletion, which is what the G7 criteria is for. You're not an administrator, so you can't delete the entry yourself.

458:

While there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, and can make the discussion difficult to

178:

If you want for the page which content you are the only substantial contributor to be deleted, you simply put {{db-author}} on the top of the page and soon some of the administrators will check the article and delete it. Kind regards.

2294: 993:

Why are you requesting "speedy deletion" of the entry I wrote? I am one of the co-founders of the company and it is a historical recording of events from 10-20 years ago. That is what Knowledge (XXG) is for.

1974:

I expect you to either provide at least one link to a place on OR OFF Wiki where I "openly advocate communism" or to retract the personal attack you made on me at Articles for Deletion. I'm serious.

1320:

sir, actually u didn't commit any mistake but u had keft a song "kya hua tera wada" and I thought that I should add it here, still I didn't knew how to format the text . could u please do that,sir.

2728: 897:

which doesn't feature specific stub type determination. I will try to manually specify stub-type next time. Additionally, you can ask script developers about your concerns. Kind regards.

1343:

page. A considerably large Haitian American population are Jehovah's Witnesses, and yet you removed the edit. I am unsure why you did this but it certainly was constructive.

850:

template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the

1398:

I don't like deleting articles that are obviously meant as user pages. On reflection, I think your best course of action would be to ask someone else to do the deletion.

341:

couldn't be alright, and most of the user would revert it, as you can't add to identical headings one over one. Additionally, you shouldn't make controversial edits like

1447:

was most recent. So, I thought it was some kind of mistake. Anyway, the page ought to be deleted soon and particular user should be blocked for disruptive edit warring.

2119: 432:

renaming doesn't include capitalisation and this was on Afd not Speedy Deletion and you must refrain from touching the article if you have no intention of fixing it.--

399:(one of the first rules of wikipedia) the article and instead nominated it for deletion and now you are reverting the "capitalisation" which i tried to fix, you have 1280: 317:

American sports), I must remind you that no matter how much you know, you must not use yourself as a source and must make reference to reliable independent sources

1905:

Responding to your emailed questions: not necessarily, and not at this time. If you want answers that are more detailed, let me know and I'll respond by email.

866: 1276: 560: 525:"I am here to improve this incredible project of 💕." I used to have this on my userpage and someone once gave me a barnstar for it, so I am doing the same. 2766: 2620: 2567: 2457: 2263: 2044: 1290: 570: 556: 2684: 1884: 1647: 1509: 766: 644:

creation of a page will be put up for speedy deletion. Only once however. This is not a threat to your life. I can assure you that. Send me a message back

2856:. Since you are not an admin, it would be best if you choose another kind of mop/broom/cleaning utensil so there is no misunderstanding. All the best, 2557: 2348: 744: 737: 2738: 2610: 2193:. I know that. But what specifically did you have in mind? (Considering I haven't been active for a while.) Any particular article or diff? Thanks. 2553: 2447: 2034: 2606: 2253: 2443: 2030: 1761:

Hello Aleksa. I noticed you tagged the redirect of Hiihdon lajiosa for speedy deletion, which is fine, I simply want to redirect it from here

2762: 2616: 2563: 2453: 2259: 2040: 1696: 1680: 1286: 1111:

Sorry. There were no sources and I didn't mention anything notable, although I didn't check it outside of Knowledge (XXG). Thanks for a tip.

566: 2706: 2249: 862: 1321: 1244: 918: 718: 601:

why I cannot spread the news on the zodiac killer. I am afraid. It must stay. If you try to change it. There will be severe consequences.

78: 42: 1813:

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that

1597: 1567: 1004: 68: 58: 2086: 1158: 2411:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 2142:

you changed something on a talk page, the thing i wrote, you shouldn't have removed the talk words, i just want to suggest you that.

2521:

continues, please do not disrupt it again. If you have anything to contribute to the discussion, please do so on the talk page of

1189:

Exactly. Not to be so hard BTW, some joke now and then is welcome, but not in the articles, that actually damages Knowledge (XXG).

452:

if the existing title is incorrect; this is called moving a page. (So every change is also a rename.) Also here's short guide from

1801: 1784: 676: 627: 2513: 122: 2613:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2560:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2450:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2392: 2368: 2256:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2037:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1283:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 563:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2759:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1528:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1367: 800: 2802: 1418:

Just curious as to why you changed the CSD on SlixeMix from G11, as the purpose is clearly advertising/promoting a company?

1228:

You can the Artikel ändern of Free pleace bitte ändern Sie Status in "Free" i have right doing (ich habe richtig gemacht).

395:

What are you doing?, First you refused to "google" the actor and nominated it straight for deletion and didn't even bother

132:

You're right, I wasn't looking the whole history backlog of the page (and that's quite difficult to do with script such as

1855: 1841: 486:", then yes, that may have been a problem but all i did was fix capitalisation and i did not change the current wording.-- 166: 2408: 1477: 851: 2735: 2219: 2174: 1989:

It may be that I didn't use best words, but you still may be closely related to communism/Marxism. Here are the diffs:

1383:

Fair comment. However, this editor is sixteen by my calculations. I think we have admins who are younger than that.

937:

do redirects. It might be a good idea to reduce to a level 1 warning message, all things considered. Just a heads up.

880: 2853: 2375: 1814: 1210:{{German Wiki}} Kristijan Golubović ist frei seit dem 16.12.2013 ist aus dem Gefängnis entlassen wurden in Beograd 2751:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2597:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2544:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2522: 2518: 2497: 2434:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2240:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2017:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1529: 1515: 1263:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

547:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

530: 349:

and established consensus on the article's talk page. And I must agree that YouTube is definitely not considered a

300: 2500:

article, and its related detailed articles. This detail new article combines the British related elements of the

2383:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under

1124:

You're welcome. I try to search, 'cause people don't always write solid stubs. For authors and books, you can use

1027: 1020: 150:

I am withdrawing the article submission on Walden C. Rhines. Is there a way to simply delete the entry entirely?

1700: 1684: 1087: 1538: 2223: 2178: 1851: 1837: 1325: 1248: 922: 861:

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the

782: 775: 722: 378: 278: 263: 248: 46: 855: 82: 2117:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2732: 2420: 1601: 1571: 1264: 1179: 1133: 1100: 1008: 952: 72: 2890:

You do as you like, I only noticed it since I myself had my fingers slapped for using it. ;) I now use the

1692: 1676: 1593: 1563: 1355: 1240: 1154: 1000: 664: 615: 296: 154: 64: 38: 2302: 2090: 1470: 1162: 870: 274: 259: 244: 2677: 2670: 1950:

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I finally responded. I'm sorry for the delay; I simply forgot.

374: 2403: 2352: 1731: 1659: 1636: 1629: 1609:

You are welcome to improve the article, just be more careful about the external links you use. Regards,

1482: 1225:

Ich hoffe Sie können mich verstehen, mein English is verry bad sorry ... i speak Jugoslawia and German

548: 526: 389: 258:

Was i unpolite, here or in my summary in Mr.Clemente's article? I don't think so, but sorry if i was. --

2879: 2195: 2000: 1924: 1744: 1720: 1611: 1525: 1449: 1191: 1174: 1128: 1113: 1095: 1072: 899: 463: 421: 355: 215: 181: 138: 2891: 2530: 1998:. I did not intend to offend you, on the contrary, I find being a communist a humane and good thing. 1329: 672: 623: 2388: 346: 101: 2517:

Your unwarranted interference has been reverted. The cooperative work of breaking up the unwieldy

976: 200: 2158: 971:

Please take better care when reverting other users, sometimes IPs are removing vandalism. Thanks,

2901: 2863: 2849: 2695: 2416: 2335: 1770: 1426: 1363: 938: 796: 109: 2407:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1217: 827: 512: 453: 2720: 2782: 2636: 2583: 2490:

Please do not take such actions without bothering to read the talk page which clearly states:

2473: 2298: 2279: 2128: 2114: 2060: 1979: 1955: 1941: 1910: 1895: 1877: 1870: 1497: 1340: 1306: 1061: 876: 702: 586: 461:

So, why just making job more difficult when we can move the page after AfD process is closed?

326: 162: 2412: 839: 2826:

Talk:Stana_Katic#RFC:_Should_article_include_Serbo-Croatian_forms_of_Stana_Katic.27s_name.3F

2825: 2545: 2215: 2170: 1804:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the 1774: 1739: 1724: 1655: 1587: 1040: 491: 437: 385:

Michele Shover Professor of Political Science, retired, California State University, Chico

17: 2384: 1805: 894: 2598: 2526: 1823: 758: 668: 619: 230: 350: 318: 133: 1557:

key positions. Please allow me to improve our wikipedia profile. There are many errors.

1094:

A 19th century author still in print is certainly significant and likely notable. Cheers

2435: 2110: 2018: 1850:

N/A. Overturned by User:JamesBWatson and I accepted. Feel free to delete this message.

1832: 972: 781:

Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of

196: 116: 1808:, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term. 1026:

Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

353:(which need to be used in writing articles). I hope this clarifies you the situation. 2895: 2877:

Well, I used it as a sign of admin-related areas. But I can remove it if you insist.

2857: 2773: