66:
problem by moving ALL three comments (including yours 21:24, 20 December 2021 comment) to the back-and-forth discussion. In addition, I've noticed that your user page contains a claim that "your proposal for a neutral RfC was used to determine the articles future". Not only that is not modest, that is just false. It is up to you, but if I were you, I would feel uncomfortable when my user page contained false claims.
163:
39:
Hi there, thanks for the question :) Most of the time when I'm editing, I will read or see something interesting in a reliable source and add it to the page. I was reading about autopoises recently in a non-scientific context and I found it interesting so read up some more on it, and added a little
65:
posts (one was a vote, and another was a comment). If you have a right to make additional comments, then other users have a right to comment on it. If you don't think other users can do that, then you cannot make comments either. Otherwise, your approach is just unfair. You can easily resolve this
60:
You collapsed my comment on your comment, and I reverted you. First, I am not commenting on user's votes (the posts that start with "Yes"/"No"), because I believe users must comment only once. However, you took liberty to make
208:
192:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
177:
25:
140:
Hey , yeah I need to get round to it. I've been reading others comments but haven't had the time to properly consider them all yet. I'll probably do it today. Kind regards
231:
85:. Then everything was fine. If you do not plan to vote (to make additional posts), feel free to remove my post completely (or collapse it).
88:
Again, if you are not going to vote in this section, I am bringing my apologies and respectfully ask you to delete/collapse my post.
21:
Hi there, I was wondering why your most edited wiki page was
Autopoises? Just was in a wiki wormhole and stumbled upon your profile
29:
227:
201:
213:
189:
125:
Any reason why you haven't participated in the RFC yet? All the other participants in the DR process have. --
96:
71:
171:
185:
92:
67:
197:
220:
105:
Everything after the first sentence of this message is wrong, it's quite impressive really.
200:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
193:
141:
106:
41:
130:
162:
126:
204:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
235:
181:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
149:
134:
114:
100:
75:
49:
33:
217:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
207:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
175:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
81:
Actually, I've just realised that you didn't vote for/against
40:
to the wikipedia page as well as cleaning it up a little
188:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
8:
7:
172:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
190:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
156:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
26:2600:6C60:0:B9:B829:F4A2:B5FD:1927
14:
161:
211:and submit your choices on the
1:
236:00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
150:20:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
135:00:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
115:09:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
101:00:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
76:00:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
50:10:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
34:04:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
254:
228:MediaWiki message delivery
225:to your user talk page.
145:
110:
45:
186:Arbitration Committee
169:Hello! Voting in the
202:arbitration policy
238:
245:
226:
224:
165:
253:
252:
248:
247:
246:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
218:
166:
158:
123:
58:
19:
12:
11:
5:
251:
249:
209:the candidates
178:eligible users
167:
160:
159:
157:
154:
153:
152:
122:
119:
118:
117:
103:
89:
86:
57:
54:
53:
52:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
250:
239:
237:
233:
229:
222:
216:
215:
210:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
182:
180:
179:
174:
173:
164:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
102:
98:
94:
90:
87:
84:
80:
79:
78:
77:
73:
69:
64:
55:
51:
47:
43:
38:
37:
36:
35:
31:
27:
22:
16:
212:
206:
183:
176:
170:
168:
124:
93:Paul Siebert
82:
68:Paul Siebert
62:
59:
56:RfC comments
23:
20:
17:Hi vanteloop
214:voting page
198:topic bans
194:site bans
142:Vanteloop
121:MKuCR RFC
107:Vanteloop
42:Vanteloop
221:NoACEMM
91:Best.--
24:/Bam
232:talk
184:The
146:talk
131:talk
111:talk
97:talk
72:talk
46:talk
30:talk
127:Nug
63:two
234:)
223:}}
219:{{
196:,
148:)
133:)
113:)
99:)
74:)
48:)
32:)
230:(
144:(
129:(
109:(
95:(
83:C
70:(
44:(
28:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
