Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Vgmddg

Source 📝

167:) My personal opinion is that ideally every article should have more than one source. If an article only uses information from one source then eventually that article will essentially turn a copy of the source. Also, in terms of the 227:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 171:, as of right now it currently only consists of one sentence. Now granted, the article could be expanded using information from the reference listed, but perhaps not everybody has access to the 175:. If there is another source that could be used then broadcasting that it needs one may prompt a passerby to add another, possibly more accessible source. I'm not going to engage in an 164: 128:
There are more important things to do to new stub articles - that one needed a default sort, and birth and death categories, and improvements to its categories, and
54:
Seriously though that's a good thing. That was so refreshing to see considering how many users barely make the effort to explain any of their edits. --
252: 248: 195: 84: 32: 239:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
244: 176: 240: 216: 207: 142: 121: 104: 60: 236: 220: 126:"A single source is not automatically a problem. Good judgment and common sense should be used." 51:
If there was a barnstar for rigorous edit summary usage you'd definitely deserve one! lol! ;P
232: 224: 235:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 228: 153: 55: 132: 168: 111: 68:
Thanks! There should be an edit summary Barnstar (if there isn't already one)! --
187: 182: 76: 71: 24: 19: 149: 16:
Hi there! Feel free to leave me a message and I will probably respond.--
223:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
256: 200: 157: 89: 62: 37: 116: 114:
only had one source, but it was the ultimate in reliability (
124:, you'll see it urges the use of discretion: in particular 47: 179:
or anything. I just wanted to give my point of view.--
100:
Hi, I think you're being over-enthusiastic in using
215:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 120:). If you look at the template documentation at 138:or, better, a sorted stub tag. It didn't need 8: 173:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography 165:Assuming the assumption of good faith 7: 14: 241:review the candidates' statements 247:. For the Election committee, 217:Arbitration Committee election 208:ArbCom elections are now open! 63:07:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 257:14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 201:21:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 169:specific article in question 158:09:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 243:and submit your choices on 90:20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 272: 249:MediaWiki message delivery 38:19:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC) 221:Arbitration Committee 225:arbitration process 122:Template:One_source 237:arbitration policy 43:Your edit summary 263: 147: 141: 137: 131: 109: 103: 58: 271: 270: 266: 265: 264: 262: 261: 260: 245:the voting page 211: 145: 139: 135: 129: 110:. OK, the stub 107: 101: 98: 56: 45: 12: 11: 5: 269: 267: 214: 210: 205: 204: 203: 97: 94: 93: 92: 44: 41: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 268: 259: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 209: 206: 202: 199: 197: 193: 189: 185: 184: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 144: 134: 127: 123: 119: 118: 113: 106: 95: 91: 88: 86: 82: 78: 74: 73: 67: 66: 65: 64: 61: 59: 52: 49: 48: 42: 40: 39: 36: 34: 30: 26: 22: 21: 212: 191: 181: 180: 172: 125: 115: 112:Lucy Garnett 99: 80: 70: 69: 53: 50: 46: 28: 18: 17: 15: 233:topic bans 143:one source 105:one source 96:One Source 229:site bans 177:edit war 219:. The 183:vgmddg 72:vgmddg 20:vgmddg 253:talk 192:talk 188:look 154:talk 150:PamD 133:stub 117:ODNB 81:talk 77:look 29:talk 25:look 213:Hi, 255:) 231:, 196:do 194:| 190:| 156:) 148:. 146:}} 140:{{ 136:}} 130:{{ 108:}} 102:{{ 85:do 83:| 79:| 33:do 31:| 27:| 251:( 198:) 186:( 163:( 152:( 87:) 75:( 57:œ 35:) 23:(

Index

vgmddg
look
talk
do
19:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

œ

07:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
vgmddg
look
talk
do
20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
one source
Lucy Garnett
ODNB
Template:One_source
stub
one source
PamD
talk
09:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Assuming the assumption of good faith
specific article in question
edit war
vgmddg
look
talk
do

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.