195:, some of whom collaborated on what I wrote, that had been on certain pages for months. There is not even evidence that you have a vested interest in, or knowledge of, some of the topics I'm editing. You swore at me on my talk page. You erroneously accused me of racism. Now, you're trying to tie me to a two year old account in order to forever purge me from Knowledge (XXG)? I didn't do anything wrong. I certainly didn't vandalize pages. I abided by the last ban that was placed on my IP address. I never bothered the moderators of pages that I edited. Other users added to the information I did. And you've taken it upon yourself to delete whole paragraphs of information from me, and others, some of it literally months old. Explain to me how you're in the right?
151:, I edited it so that it wouldn't be phrased as a fusion cuisine. It is regional to the southwest among Tejano people, a region that belonged to Mexico in the past. Are you anti-American? Because these are flimsy excuses to attack all of my edits, across pages that you were previously not paying attention to whatsoever, that you clearly have very little interest in or knowledge about yourself. You have also deleted other user's contributions, and now you're accusing me of racism? What? Can you direct me to a forum where I can discuss your conduct as an editor with someone "higher up", because I can't believe you can get away with that. Now you're even swearing at me on my talk page.
564:) at a separate address to where I'm living now, one that I no longer have access to. I'm not seeing a good case for a block here, and I'm a little miffed that the sockpuppetry keeps popping up as an excuse, whenever convenient, to silence me on Knowledge (XXG) because Binksternet doesn't like some of the information I'm adding. I would very much like to appeal this ban and have it lifted. If you have a problem with the content I'm adding, I would request a user utilize my talk page and inform me of the problems they have, so we can discuss and compromise. That way we can flesh out certain sections by collaborating on sources together. Thank you.
675:
of today after complaints by
Binksternet, and I was transparent about that. Binksternet has tried to revert a bunch of my edits on other pages, and they've been reverted by moderators. I have waited for bans to lift, I definitely have not edit-warred. What content are you so mad about that I'm adding? The content I have added was kept neutral, and though I didn't source a lot of it, I kept it to a standard of authenticity and believability I saw matched by other editors on those pages as well.
161:
450:
262:
208:
142:
scrutinization, and I can just as easily make the accusation that you, and a number of
British editors, are biased towards their national viewpoint, and routinely under-write or leave out contributions made by American culture, despite the fact that it is a soft power superpower and a current global hegemon. British editors were ultimately overruled on
556:
Knowledge (XXG), reverting some of my edits which had remained up for months without question or uproar from moderators. He's accused my content of being "substandard", but for some reason, has not deleted content of other users on the same pages that had glaring grammatical errors, and also weren't sourced. The constant accusation of
818:
account. I think I mentioned this, or at the very least implied it, on one of your talk pages. I'm often frustrated to find seemingly convenient accusations of sockpuppetry linked to me, often over accounts that I have lost the log-in information for and can no longer access. That's why I was mainly
674:
Where did I edit war, beyond reverting
Binksternet's deletion of whole paragraphs of content that have remained up and even edited by other users for months? I haven't received an explanation for why anyone is allowed to do that. I have used one IP address, which was the one I made this account off
141:
These are imputations and excuses, they don't show me doing anything wrong. The only IP ban I had expired in May. I haven't disputed any corrections or revisions made to my edits under that IP, however long ago they were made, except yours. Your accusations of me being chauvinistic don't hold up to
799:
by
Binksternet were to revert an Checkuser blocked sockpuppet named Grafton56 (sockpuppet of Dcasey98). Binksternet reverted no IPs and no other accounts "five months ago", and no other repeated reverting of a user or IP has occurred by Binksternet this year on that page. This to me reads that you
657:
That IP wasn't blocked. The only ban I had placed on that IP placed in
February of 2020 and was supposed until May. That ban was lifted, and I made edits that remained up, and unchallenged, for months. Binksternet literally deleted content other people posted too, in addition to mine. How is that
555:
about 5 months ago that was reverted and defended by other editors and moderators, and remains up. He swore at me on my talk page. He deleted content on the 'fashion' section of 2010s in culture that had been there for at least a year, which included additions by other users. He chased me around
185:
In your discussion on the administrator's noticeboard, you link me to a couple of accounts that are more than two years old - and then attacked me out of nowhere starting today for an "IP evasion". I notified you repeatedly that any ban that my IP address had on it expired in May, after the
819:
focused on my current IP conduct, on which I abided by any bans I have ever received, under which I made this account today. I think it's counterproductive to accuse anyone who's ever owned two+ Knowledge (XXG) accounts of engaging in sockpuppetry, and banning them continuously for it.
586:. You need to log in to that account, appeal your block from there, and stop creating new accounts or editing while logged out. If you create any new accounts, they will be blocked as sock puppets. If you've lost the password to your original account, you can try appealing via
49:
because you think I'm "blind to the contributions of
British culture"? Explain that to me. You've also taken it upon yourself to delete content by other uses on pages I've written on. I see a lot of excuses for targeting me for online harassment, not anything actually productive.
547:. All of it was neutral. All of it remained up for months, even as editors reviewed it and evidently accepted it. Just today, due to the pugnacity of Binksternet, I created this account to better communicate with other users in the event that a conflict would arise, as one did.
658:
fair? You've even attached me to two different accounts that I made literally years ago in a different house in a different IP address to constantly harass me on silence me on
Knowledge (XXG). How is that fair? And how am I in the wrong for adding random cultural information?
579:
You seem to have some bizarre ideas on how
Knowledge (XXG) handles sock puppetry. Once one your accounts is blocked, you are no longer allowed to edit Knowledge (XXG) any more – not until that account is unblocked. You've admitted that you're a sock puppet of
44:
I haven't evaded a block if I utilize account creation from my unblocked IP address. I haven't done anything wrong on that IP address. You have held me to a standard that no other editor on the pages I have edited on has been held to, and reverted my edits on
190:
page. I abided by the ban, and didn't start editing with that IP address until the ban was lifted. I made an array of edits, and I never challenged anything if they were altered or deleted. In today's stream of edits, you have deleted content of mine
146:
and made IP address edits to delete sourced additions to the page because they didn't want
America to gain originating credit. Those deletions were reverted by other users and moderators. That shows British nationalism. I did not remove "Mexico" from
83:
Your argument about being held to a higher standard makes me think that you are saying your low quality contributions should be allowed to stay because other low quality contributions exist. That argument doesn't fly with me – it's a race to the
720:
I took the subsequent discussion into account in my review. Blaming other editors instead of dealing with your problematic behavior isn't a path to unblocking. For my part you're blocked for treating
Knowledge (XXG) as a battleground.
703:
I don't see how Binksternet's conduct is anything but unfair, nor how anything I added to any page was wrong. I assume you're notifying all the users who had their content deleted in your scourge of mine from various pages?
369:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
638:
To my knowledge, I never evaded a block. I created an account from my IP address that another user who had harassed me for more than a year now had an issue with, to open up a more consistent channel of
678:
Please don't mischaracterize my action as driven by emotion —I am not mad— because it is not. The edit war corresponds to your multiple reversions. By the way, your unblock request is currently blank.
793:
has often battled with me on Knowledge (XXG) on my original IP address, and repeatedly reverted a sourced edit I made to Heavy Metal music about 5 months ago that was reverted...
165:
535:
I have used the 2601:243:680:3688:387e:d11c:c1c8:7791 IP address, which had a ban on it from February 2020 that lifted in May 2020, to make various edits on pages such as
628:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
441:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
22:
828:
At least eight named accounts and a bunch of IPs have been blocked since 2016. I'm turning off talkpage access, this discussion serves no further purpose.
119:
You are obviously entrenched in the view that America Rules All. Beyond your wicked strong nationalism, you are also pushing your reactionary social views
490:
302:
687:
I'm sorry, I'm just getting used to the formating. It seems my editing mistake meant my appeal was immediately rejected, can I pose another request?
613:
426:
396:
233:
485:
297:
65:
26:
551:
has often battled with me on Knowledge (XXG) on my original IP address, and repeatedly reverted a sourced edit I made to
463:
275:
221:
216:
457:
269:
599:
504:
462:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
316:
274:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
743:
I would prefer not to be, but the only user I've really ever had this issue with to any consistent level has been
53:
690:
That is allowed, though I think the chances of it succeeding is low. At any rate, you should really read
595:
173:
132:
34:
77:
837:
730:
408:
756:
805:
76:
You are evading a block if you create a new username to restore material from blocked editors. See
88:
80:. Just because you can technically do it does not mean you are not in violation of a hard policy.
814:
That was indeed the account I had used at my previous address a long while after I had lost the
820:
796:
748:
565:
560:
seems to come from an attempt to link me to an account I created well over a year or two ago (
552:
468:
348:
280:
187:
143:
57:
587:
226:
790:
744:
622:
548:
536:
435:
239:
169:
128:
30:
691:
831:
724:
402:
662:
591:
707:
Negative, I am not obliged to notify anyone about anything with regards to this matter.
801:
544:
87:
In the past, you removed British contributions to music and fashion because, you know,
815:
561:
557:
540:
374:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge (XXG),
760:
708:
695:
679:
666:
646:
252:
845:
823:
809:
763:
751:
738:
711:
698:
682:
669:
649:
603:
416:
356:
255:
207:
177:
136:
38:
594:
is a possibility, but it requires you to stop creating new sock puppets.
232:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
236:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
148:
168:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
582:
448:
260:
206:
665:
in direct support of certain IPs. That is totally suspect.
610:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
423:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
630:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
443:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
641:
518:
514:
508:
499:
495:
481:
477:
473:
330:
326:
320:
311:
307:
293:
289:
285:
124:
120:
117:
115:
113:
111:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
800:
are saying that you are Grafton56 (aka Dcasey98), no?
166:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
110:
You also said that global music genres were American.
456:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
386:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
268:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
21:Just to be clear, you are now evading the block of
380:the block is no longer necessary because you
127:you are hiding racism. What the actual fuck.
123:, saying "Feminism is as bad as racism." And
8:
795:" The only reverts "five months ago" on the
23:Special:Contributions/2601:243:680:3688::/64
383:understand what you have been blocked for,
51:
186:altercation in the talk page seen on the
747:. So I thought that warranted emphasis.
389:will make useful contributions instead.
789:
637:
7:
788:Let me quote what you state above, "
164:There is currently a discussion at
107:. You removed Mexico from Tex Mex!
14:
661:Come on, you're entering into an
27:Special:Contributions/73.8.230.59
159:
1:
636:Your story is not adding up:
759:is not a winning strategy.
460:, who declined the request.
272:, who declined the request.
868:
846:03:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
824:03:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
810:03:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
764:03:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
752:03:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
739:03:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
712:03:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
699:03:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
683:03:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
670:02:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
650:02:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
604:04:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
417:03:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
357:03:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
256:02:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
178:02:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
614:guide to appealing blocks
427:guide to appealing blocks
397:guide to appealing blocks
234:guide to appealing blocks
225:from editing for abusing
137:19:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
39:19:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
25:. And you were active at
590:from this account. The
352:
61:
47:American cultural pages
568:03:25, 1 August 2020.
453:
399:for more information.
265:
211:
505:change block settings
452:
317:change block settings
264:
244:Your reason here ~~~~
210:
454:
266:
212:
89:America, Fuck Yeah
842:
797:Heavy metal music
735:
694:before doing so.
553:Heavy Metal music
413:
347:Your reason here
227:multiple accounts
188:Heavy Metal music
144:Heavy Metal music
69:
56:comment added by
859:
843:
840:
836:
834:
791:User:Binksternet
736:
733:
729:
727:
627:
621:
596:NinjaRobotPirate
585:
549:User:Binksternet
537:2010s in culture
524:
522:
511:
493:
491:deleted contribs
451:
440:
434:
414:
411:
407:
405:
395:Please read the
336:
334:
323:
305:
303:deleted contribs
263:
247:
202:Indefinite block
163:
162:
867:
866:
862:
861:
860:
858:
857:
856:
838:
832:
830:
731:
725:
723:
633:
625:
619:
618:, then use the
607:
581:
570:
512:
502:
488:
471:
464:blocking policy
449:
446:
438:
432:
431:, then use the
420:
409:
403:
401:
360:
324:
314:
300:
283:
276:blocking policy
261:
250:
249:
237:
230:
204:
160:
19:
12:
11:
5:
865:
863:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
634:
608:
592:standard offer
577:
573:Decline reason
545:Fashion design
533:
529:Request reason
526:
447:
421:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
384:
378:
367:
363:Decline reason
345:
341:Request reason
338:
259:
231:
214:You have been
213:
205:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
85:
81:
71:
70:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
864:
847:
844:
841:
835:
827:
826:
825:
822:
817:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
798:
794:
792:
787:
786:
785:
784:
765:
762:
758:
755:
754:
753:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
737:
734:
728:
719:
713:
710:
706:
705:
702:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
688:
686:
685:
684:
681:
677:
676:
673:
672:
671:
668:
664:
660:
659:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
640:
632:
631:
624:
617:
615:
606:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
584:
576:
574:
569:
567:
563:
559:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
532:
530:
525:
520:
516:
510:
506:
501:
497:
492:
487:
483:
482:global blocks
479:
478:active blocks
475:
470:
465:
461:
459:
458:administrator
445:
444:
437:
430:
428:
419:
418:
415:
412:
406:
398:
388:
385:
382:
381:
379:
377:
373:
372:
371:
366:
364:
359:
358:
354:
350:
344:
342:
337:
332:
328:
322:
318:
313:
309:
304:
299:
295:
294:global blocks
291:
290:active blocks
287:
282:
277:
273:
271:
270:administrator
258:
257:
254:
245:
241:
235:
228:
224:
223:
219:
218:
209:
201:
194:
189:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
171:
167:
150:
145:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
116:
114:
112:
109:
106:
102:
98:
94:
91:. You did it
90:
86:
82:
79:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
43:
42:
41:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
17:Block evasion
16:
829:
821:Velvetlaptop
749:Velvetlaptop
722:
643:
635:
629:
611:
609:
578:
572:
571:
566:Velvetlaptop
558:sockpuppetry
541:Street Style
534:
528:
527:
500:creation log
469:Velvetlaptop
467:
455:
442:
424:
422:
400:
394:
375:
368:
362:
361:
349:Velvetlaptop
346:
340:
339:
312:creation log
281:Velvetlaptop
279:
267:
251:
243:
222:indefinitely
220:
215:
192:
158:
58:Velvetlaptop
52:— Preceding
46:
20:
745:Binksternet
639:discussion.
170:Binksternet
129:Binksternet
78:WP:MULTIPLE
31:Binksternet
833:Acroterion
757:WP:NOTTHEM
726:Acroterion
496:filter log
404:Acroterion
308:filter log
193:and others
802:Zinnober9
612:read the
515:checkuser
474:block log
425:read the
327:checkuser
286:block log
816:Dcasey98
663:edit war
583:Dcasey98
562:Dcasey98
486:contribs
298:contribs
242:|reason=
66:contribs
54:unsigned
623:unblock
588:WP:UTRS
509:unblock
436:unblock
321:unblock
240:unblock
217:blocked
149:Tex-Mex
84:bottom.
839:(talk)
732:(talk)
692:WP:GAB
543:, and
410:(talk)
644:What?
616:first
429:first
806:talk
761:El_C
709:El_C
696:El_C
680:El_C
667:El_C
647:El_C
600:talk
353:talk
253:El_C
229:.
174:talk
133:talk
125:here
121:here
105:here
103:and
101:here
97:here
93:here
62:talk
35:talk
519:log
466:).
331:log
278:).
808:)
626:}}
620:{{
602:)
575::
539:,
531::
513:•
507:•
503:•
498:•
494:•
489:•
484:•
480:•
476:•
439:}}
433:{{
376:or
365::
355:)
343::
325:•
319:•
315:•
310:•
306:•
301:•
296:•
292:•
288:•
248:.
246:}}
238:{{
176:)
135:)
99:,
95:,
68:)
64:•
37:)
29:.
804:(
598:(
523:)
521:)
517:(
472:(
351:(
335:)
333:)
329:(
284:(
172:(
131:(
60:(
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.