User talk:Verica Atrebatum

74:- also called William - by an earlier marriage, but he died in 1383, so when the 2nd Earl died in 1397 the title passed to a cadet line. This was John, Alice's grandfather, and as far I can see they are always referred to as Montagu. Alice's descent from Joan of Kent was through her mother's Holland forebears, not the Montacute marriage. Also - for what it's worth - all the books I've read refer to the family as Montague at this period, so using this spelling makes it easier for anyone to work out who was who. Thanks for the Bisham addition - I wondered what property she brought with her. 2327: 1320: 1660: 2761: 3219: 3097: 2809: 2644: 2514: 2441: 1279:

google test is hardly perfect, if you compare google searches for "Church of the Holy Ghost" "Midsomer Norton" there are a decent handful of hits (including links from Bath and North East Somerset local authority website and from the Royal Institute of British Architects), but searching for "Holy Ghost Church" "Midsomer Norton" gets you only two. Could I please move it back?

109:, where there was a wounding Merge proposal to my sparkling new article, you'll see why. I've had 2 days of utter grief with this. If you are an administrator, please effect the deletion. I am a keen contributor and utterly desperate at the position I've been put in. (By the way, have you read Sarah Gristwood's brilliant biog. of Arbella Stuart? it's great.)Thanks. -- 2952: 2279: 1608: 2106:

detailed maps that shows the southern part of Popeswood is enclosed by Beehive Road and Beehive Lane. John Nike Way is well south of there making the ski slope definitely in Amen Corner. Another document I found on proposed development of Amen Corner to the east (no link handy) seems to confirm this.

631:

I say 'my article' as i created it i know its not my property but im just asking for a bit of curtiousy. If you want to add info to the article thats what wikipedias all about not re-writing it and making it look worse than you obviously thought it was. and who the hell is this 86.139.72.14? hes not

73:

Here's what I think happened with these two families. William de Montacute (2nd Earl 1329-1397) married Joan, the Fair Maid of Kent, in about 1340. However, she was already married to Thomas Holland, 1st Earl of Kent, so the marriage was annulled - there were no children. William already had a child

725:

I've just realised the category scheme you have been using for Oxfordshire is towns instead of local government districts. We have been using districts elsewhere as they create larger, more viable geographic divisions as categories. Would you be interested in a move to district-based sub categories?

564:

Since the introduction of the settlement sub-categories the people from/natives of categories in general are a bit of a mess with inconsistency in how they are categorised. Where boundaries have changed, some have both the old and new county, some have the old, and some have the new. If the articles

21:

Hi Verica, I see you have contributed much to the Coworth House page. Have you not looked into its more recent history from the 1950's onwards...?. As for the hotel I would like to get hold of some actual history for the guests...wherre is the best place to look, can you assist, if so please mail me

1980:

I have recently expanded the article to include most of the text from the DNB but I have included the family information from the ODNB. I would be interested to discuss with you further how we can tidy up the family section given that the political biography of the man rather than his marriages are

1842:

By all means, feel free. (btw, I hope I don't offend, but I have put Bradley back, on the basis of the info from Knowles and Hadcock, and included a link to the online VCH - but I have unlinked the name on the basis that there is sufficient doubt about the nature of the establishment as to warrant

1808:

I am currently re-thinking the issue of granges - I intend to make the inclusion on the same basis as that of hospitals and exclude any which did not function at one time as a monastery. I am currently going through each monastic establishment, county by county using Hadcock & Knowles Medieval

1396:

and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund

485:

See, this is a clear textual similarity, one or two words have been changed, this is all. This needs rephrasing not reverting. Now, I rewrote this in my own words, without reference to the other text. If this is itself too similar, we need to come up with even more different wording, rather than

404:

Wokingham Town Council is made up of twenty-five councillors representing the four wards of the town; Emmbrook, Evendons, Norreys and Wescott. The Town Councillors are elected every four years and each year all twenty-five Councillors elect one Town Councillor to be the Town's Mayor and Chairman of

1504:

Hi. Just a quick heads up. You have added templates to the three affected articles suggesting this merger, but not given reason for this merger on the appointed talk page. I think it would be unfortunate if this merger went through without a reason being put forward, so I have formally opposed the

1278:

seems to imply (to me) that we should use the most common / recognisable name, and it is my experience that those people who do not call this church just the "Catholic Church" refer to it as "Church of the Holy Ghost". I've never heard it or read it referred to as "Holy Ghost Church". Although the

740:

Are we still talking about 'People from...' categories? The only one I've created is 'People from Abingdon, Oxfordshire'. I think I based this on the Berkshire ones, 'People of Reading, Berkshire', 'People of Windsor, Berkshire', etc. Local government districts sounds sensible to me. That would

2081:

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new

2526:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2082:

contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you.

181:

The photo I uploaded of the dry ski slope in Bracknell is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence - that means, I think, that I should give the photographer (a chap called Andrew Smith) credit for his work. I did that in the photo caption, but you removed it.

2656:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1293:

Hi, I noticed you'd moved a lot of the articles on my watch list from being Church of St X to St X's church. Is there a particular naming convention which covers this as I've seen various forms used? If there is a particular guideline we should be following you might want to look at

188:

BTW I have no idea who Andrew Smith is (certainly not me - I habitually upload my own photos and renounce all copyright :) but I just wanted to be fair to him, as he has uploaded some really nice photos to the geograph website and I wouldn't want to abuse his choice of licence.

1752:" where does this information come from because AFAICT it is not in either of the cited sources. Please add a reliable citation or reply on the article talk page if you do not have a citation to hand or if I have misread the sources and indeed it is contained within them. -- 2892:

Hello, do you have a cite for changing the year and place of birth? I'm not saying you are wrong, but cite 4 gives the current information and nothing was offered as verifiable information. I have removed it for now but please feel free to re add if fully cited. Cheers

935:

i've noticed that railway stations have their own separaye article like didcot parkway and appleford...but what about places like Upton&Blewbury,Steventon. those stations were closed in the 60s, but i still think it'd be worth creating articles(ive not found any

838:

I've been sorting them all out, finding out information about transport links(buses trains), a bit about the location, anything recent, the amenities(schools, pubs, shops etc). also been visiting these villages to find out a bit of information from the locals.

2101:

Not sure if you look here much these days. I am currently updating all the articles on Bracknell estates. In 2010 you moved references to the John Nike centre from Amen Corner to Popeswood, claiming it was there. I am fairly sure this is wrong. I found at

2453:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

48:

Hi. In principle I have no problem with the article being renamed The Mug House, Claines. However, until such time as articles are created for the other two venues you mention I would like to maintain a re-direct page from mug house to the new page.

1976:

and his marriages. My major concern is that there seems to be a fair amount of research carried out using unreliable sources (Nash Ford Publishing) and while such stuff is fine for the talk page I am not yet convinced it should be in article space.

1391:

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to

2107:

If I hear nothing from you I propose moving it back to Amen Corner. However this part of Bracknell/Binfield is quite confusing with Farley Wood, Temple Park, Popeswood and Binfield overlapping on some maps. Long time Bracknell resident...

1177:

his descendants used. Robert himself was only fitz Martin, indicating the name of his father, and had no surname himself. What appears to be his surname is just a descriptive term; only after his time did it become a surname. Sincerely,

646:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable 1133:

That's what I'd always been told, but I don't have a reference. I believe one of the members owns the music shop at Amen Corner. Presumably he bought it because of the name, rather than the band actually being named after the place.

950:

17:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Postscript....how do i start an entry in another language? for example, if i wanted to create a spanish entry for didcot. how would i go about? and please use reletively simple terminology ;)

343:

What's the rationale here? Are the Knowledge guidelines on topic naming? I find it rather confusing that the topic name is not what is displayed in the URL field of the browser. How does one know how to link to the topic?

2234:

Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability back in 2008. It seemed non-notable to me, but I wasn't sure enough to nominate for deletion. You may want to take it to AfD or the Notability Noticeboard. Best wishes,

2040:

article - thank you. Can I encourage you to also state your sources? There was unfortunately not a single reference given. I've had a look myself, and it would appear that the relevant sources are all available online.

2396:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3262: 3140: 2852: 2684: 2554: 2481: 159:

Oops! My fault - apologies. I was so traumatised by the events of the last 2 days, and transferring material in haste when bleary-eyed this a.m., that I didn't notice that boob of mine. Thanks. ––

3246:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3124:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2836:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2668:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2538:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2465:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 500:

Ah, I see now, that you did in fact alter the phrasing, whilst claiming in your edit comment that there was nothing wrong with the text as it stood. Sorry, the wording at present can stand.

202:

As the photo in question had the credit on its own page, I didn't see that it was necessary to repeat this information under the Bracknell article. However, I have put it back as requested.

3232: 3110: 2822: 528:

I'm new round here, so I can see that there might well be a point. I just don't know what it is. All I can see at the moment is that the route to the page is now rather more complex.

525:

I can see why having made the first change (to 'hurch') the second change (to 'church') was needed. But what was the point of the whole exercise? We seem to be back where we started.

1637: 2294: 766:

I would not suggest re-aligning to local government districts as the historical application of current units would be problematic. However, I have been grouping the lowest level

1115:

I have changed your reference to the band being named after a location in Berkshire, to what I believe is correct (from other sources), that the band was named after the 1954

2967: 2256:

Thanks for tagging this article for notability back in 2008. It's still tagged; you may want to take it to the Notability noticeboard or AfD to get it resolved. Best wishes,

340:

Surely it is not good practice to use spaces in links as they are interpreted differently by different sysems -- in the case above they are apparently substituted with %27_.

122:

Dear Verica, Hello again. I'm happy to tell you that Big Royal Dig has now been deleted. Please leave the material on the Windsor page. I'm a happier bunny now. :o) --

542:, which explains the change of capitalization. I'm afraid I forgot to fix the double redirect which has probably added to your confusion. This is now done. Good split from 2777: 363:

In the URL the spaces become underscores, the apostrophe is the %27 and the comma is the %2C. This is standard Knowledge usage and should be understood by all browsers.

2192: 185:

Do you have an objection to giving credit to the photographer with Attribution-ShareAlike images? If so, please explain. Otherwise, maybe you'd like to put it back.

2771:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the 2188: 1689:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1211:

Hi - I wondered if you give me a little more background for your edit to this page - the citation sheet says that this site falls partly within Berkshire. Thanks

922:

Hi Verica Atrebatum.... I'm quite new to the Knowledge site, i've been trying to do all this for ages on paper, but now i've found this, its like a godsend lol.

1611:

Hi Verica Atrebatum! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see

250:

towards North America, and instead establish Knowledge as an international website, then please feel welcome to contribute with your opinions. Thank you.

3020: 2611: 2202: 2149: 1264: 1021: 741:

ensure the whole country was covered. I can fix them if you like and put in a redirect. However, might these not be moving to 'Natives of...' anyway?

1143:

Was the location called Amen Corner before he bought the shop there ? If not, perhaps the location is named after the shop rather than vice versa ?

421:

of the town: Emmbrook, Evendons, Norreys and Wescott. The councillors are elected every four years and every year they elect one of their number as

2010:- do you recall what prompted you to add it? Sutton Courtenay wasn't mentioned in the text at the time, and isn't in the current version either. -- 2357: 1350: 1064: 1052: 856: 580: 303:& realted bits I've been doing) & thank you for spotting my typo - I've checked back in my books & you are right so I've changed to 2139: 965:

There are actually two ways to sort articles within categories. The "older" way is to add the name to each category. Recently, they added the

3016: 2767: 2752: 2607: 2198: 2145: 868: 355: 771: 3285: 3162: 2874: 2698: 2568: 2495: 2421: 2353: 1346: 1250:

article. It took me quite a while to gather my research and producing an article that made sense of my pile of notes was a task in itself!

29: 2135: 1584: 324:

Why did you move the topic on St. Nicolas' Church to have spaces, i.e. St Nicolas' Church, Abingdon? Now the URL likes rather ugly, like

264:

I see you've been tidying the categories on some of the SSSI articles I did from Berks to West Berks. Would you be kind enough to look at

1928:

As you did the original move, I just wanted to check whether you have any objections to this. There's also a section on this proposal at

706:, it makes sense to have moved it. I marked it for speedy delete as the original author has made no claims of notability for the band. - 2782: 1824:

Sounds good to me, John. Would you like me to extract the Berkshire/Oxfordshire granges on that basis? - that's where my interest lies.

2356:

for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the

1349:

for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the

2945: 2272: 1268: 1088:

Thanks for change to Hugh de Grandmesnil - I am (It is) very short of refs for that article. Could you suggest one for your addition?

265: 1200:

Hi, Please let me know if you have any knowledge about any non-fiction about Islam or any other religion etc by T.P. Hughes. Thanks

1929: 610:

This Tad102 guy obviously doesn't understand Knowledge. If he did, he would realise how ridiculous the phrase "my article" sounds!

354:

I moved the article to one with a format matching most other church articles. The standard format is St Name's Church, Place. See

3281: 3158: 2870: 2694: 2564: 2491: 2417: 2339: 1332: 515: 2195:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2142:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1990: 1757: 1630: 1173:

Hello Verica. Would you be able to revise your edit on Robert fitz Martin? You changed his name to FitzMartin, which is the

1040: 762:

etc. The same applies for Berkshire which appears to currently be a mix of local government districts and towns. As for the

975:

mechanism. Therefore, if you see an article with that template, you don't need to add the name to each category as you did

2912:. Not sure which edit you're talking about. If you can point me in the right direction, I'll see if I can add a citation. 1741: 1730: 1015: 674: 2926:

No worries, I saw that you hadn’t replied so I looked to clarify your edit and found a citation. It’s fixed now. Cheers.

1385: 3255: 3133: 3063: 2845: 2677: 2547: 2474: 1918: 1275: 759: 539: 2408:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3267: 3145: 2857: 2727: 2689: 2559: 2486: 2413: 1705: 1612: 1411:

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

1185:

I'm afraid I can't move the history back, so if you don't agree with the move, you'll have to flag it for discussion.

650:. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add 3006: 2959: 842:

can i get any advice on whether im going about it the rigth way?? for examples of my work...ummm....look at the new

755: 1401: 2597: 663: 2180: 2103: 1986: 1914: 1753: 1709: 1675: 1008:; redirecting to a cat makes so much more sense. Thanks for thinking of it and doing the work to implement it. 864: 565:

about people all get recategorised by settlement rather than by county it will become at least a little clearer.

1505:

merger. I'm not necessarily against the merger, but I think it needs to be explained and discussed. Regards. --

2772: 33: 1397:

raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

1381: 912:

Hope this helps. Not sure Fulscot deserves an artcile of its own, but other than that...Keep up the good work!

101:

at my urgent request. I have moved the relevant material to the appropriate articles and now I have blanked

2179:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2126:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1910: 643: 636: 1682: 1592: 1123:. If you have any clear evidence that the band was named after the Berkshire location, please provide it. 1010: 1690: 1510: 1388:

for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

1116: 835:

I've started to clear up the village pages in Oxfordshire(i'll start on Oxford and the towns eventually).

819: 1540:

Hey, thanks for your contributions here :). Would you mind referencing them to conform with wiki-policy?

3243: 3121: 3059: 2913: 2833: 2775:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

2665: 2535: 2462: 2345: 2087: 1951: 1925:. I think that here we're dealing with an established name rather than a properly punctuated statement. 1870: 1825: 1768: 1556: 1521: 1404:

at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch

1338: 1226: 1186: 1153: 1135: 1099: 990: 914: 908:

Always mention which civil parish it's in, or if the place itself is a civil parish as well as a village

796: 742: 694: 620: 547: 383: 364: 300: 291: 203: 143: 1674:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

942:

is it bad manners to go to say the local village pub and ask them for anything interesting information?

611: 2723: 1985:

how we could improve the family section of the article while reducing the "Marriage controversy". --

1004:

Good work on the Holy wells cat! I was unsure what to do with that article that in effect duplicated

3010: 2993:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2790: 2601: 2584:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1848: 1814: 1794: 1783: 1720: 969: 952: 947: 860: 707: 678: 647: 583:. I'm definitely interested in your views on reducing the settlement categories down to major towns. 222: 25: 3002: 2326: 1715:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

1319: 2409: 2364: 2308: 2112: 2048: 2018: 1888: 1686: 1671: 1545: 1479: 1458: 1295: 102: 94: 53: 2593: 3051: 2977: 2931: 2898: 1588: 1583:

and have edited thousands of other British-associated articles, a somewhat-related discussion at

1167: 1585:

Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Use of prefix "Sir" as a disambiguation aid

1380:

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the

3226: 3200: 3104: 3078: 3036: 2816: 2742: 2652: 2627: 2522: 2449: 2431: 2385: 2376: 2218: 2165: 1982: 1645: 1620: 1576: 1506: 1494: 1359: 1280: 1058: 1046: 815: 602:

I dont need your input to my article thank you so kindly stop ruining it (unsigned comment by

287: 60: 939:

i was unsure about fulscot myself, but it is a settlement, and has fulscot manor with it too.

3274: 3239: 3152: 3117: 2864: 2829: 2715: 2661: 2531: 2458: 2405: 2389: 2261: 2240: 2083: 1418: 1405: 1393: 1089: 1068: 703: 690: 505: 491: 3254:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3132:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2844:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2676:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2546:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2473:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2404:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1865:

I've (temporarily) reverted your changes to this article; would you mind referencing them?

142:

article. I didn't delete the Big Royal Dig section completely. I have now done this again.

2786: 2067: 2060: 1844: 1810: 1790: 1716: 1490: 1308: 1254: 1201: 1179: 1120: 655: 579:

Yes. There is discussion about completely replacing "People from..." with "Natives of..."

418: 345: 193: 163: 126: 113: 3013:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2604:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 335: 327: 299:

Thanks (I don't know the geograpjhy of Berkshire very well & these are based on the

3251: 3129: 2994: 2841: 2673: 2543: 2470: 2401: 2393: 2361: 2298: 2108: 2043: 2011: 1940: 1884: 1697: 1541: 1475: 1446: 1445:, but it's great you're able to expand on the other articles! Keep up the good work. 1441: 1436: 1225:

site, it is wholly on the Wiltshire site of the border. I don't know which is correct.

980: 894:

For Transport, you could mention the major routeways or railway station if there is one

850: 779: 731: 588: 570: 279: 139: 106: 86: 77: 3247: 3181: 3125: 3027:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2971: 2927: 2909: 2894: 2837: 2669: 2618:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2539: 2466: 2397: 2250: 2228: 2209:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2156:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1950:

It seems a bit dumb, but the VCH seems to concur, so I have no particular objection.

1701: 1580: 1144: 1124: 832:

Okay so i'm a little rusty to this, so not sure who this discussion is going out to.

677:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - 670: 543: 304: 283: 251: 247: 243: 1045:

Hello, Verica Atrebatum and thank you for your contributions on articles related to

3196: 3192: 3074: 3070: 3032: 3028: 2738: 2734: 2623: 2619: 2585: 2286: 2214: 2210: 2161: 2157: 2127: 1973: 1966: 1641: 1616: 1222: 1005: 774:

to fit in with a category scheme where the districts are the geographic divisions.

50: 3218: 3096: 2808: 2643: 2513: 2440: 1659: 666:

explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

3289: 3204: 3185: 3166: 3082: 3055: 3040: 2983: 2935: 2921: 2902: 2878: 2794: 2746: 2719: 2702: 2631: 2572: 2499: 2425: 2367: 2312: 2265: 2257: 2244: 2236: 2222: 2169: 2116: 2091: 2054: 2037: 2022: 1994: 1959: 1944: 1892: 1878: 1852: 1833: 1818: 1798: 1776: 1761: 1745: 1724: 1649: 1624: 1596: 1564: 1549: 1529: 1514: 1483: 1464: 1422: 1414: 1367: 1302: 1283: 1257: 1229: 1215: 1189: 1156: 1147: 1138: 1127: 1109: 1102: 1092: 1071: 1025: 993: 983: 955: 917: 872: 822: 799: 782: 745: 734: 712: 697: 683: 623: 614: 603: 591: 573: 550: 508: 501: 494: 487: 386: 367: 348: 311: 294: 272: 254: 229: 218: 206: 196: 166: 146: 129: 116: 80: 63: 37: 1917:, give the name of the church without any apostrophe, so I'm proposing to move 1704:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 853:. Any help with this cleanup project and renovation would be most apprecaited. 2104:

http://www.bracknell-forest.gov.uk/chapter-1-binfield-popeswood-study-area.pdf

1520:

Thanks for the reminder. All done now. It's not too late to change your vote!

1498: 1212: 414: 160: 123: 110: 1685:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

1063:

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us

2349: 2184: 1936: 1749: 1615:, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.-- 1433: 1342: 1299: 775: 727: 584: 566: 308: 269: 242:

I would like to draw your attention to the discussion currently ongoing at

93:

Dear Verica, Hi - I have reverted your recent Windsor Castle edit because

2998: 2131: 1906: 1247: 891:

For the recent developments, always mention the date if things may change

689:

I have no interest in this article. I just moved the information off the

459:

the four wards of the town; Emmbrook, Evendons, Norreys and Wescott. The

226: 3258:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3136:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2951: 2848:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2680:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2550:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2477:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2278: 1981:

now the main focus of the article. Perhaps you would like to suggest at

1607: 3236:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3114:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2826:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2589: 847: 843: 98: 332:

When I do copy link location from a page linking to the topic, I see

278:

No problem, Rod. I'll take a look when I get some time. BTW, I think

221:; it really needed it - I threw the image in when I uploaded it for 1636:

This category, which you created, has been nominated for deletion

1039: 422: 2392:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1696:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

3271:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3180:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3149:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3050:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2861:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2714:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

486:

use text which is blatantly textually derived from the website.

3261:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3139:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2851:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2683:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2553:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2480:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

3230:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3108:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

926:

How do i add categories? and where would i find relevant ones?

810:

Thanks for all the categorizing help re castles, hillforts etc

2958:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2285:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

885:

Always make sure you add appropriate categories at the bottom

138:

I only deleted the paragaraph that was repeated twice in the

2950: 2325: 2277: 1658: 1318: 754:

Sorry crossed-wires. I meant the general categories such as

1708:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 1432:

Hi! I'd just like to say thanks for tidying up some of the

979:. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- 888:

Always add the appropriate stub tag if it's a short article

1274:

I am unsure about your justification for the above move.

1246:

I just wanted to thank you for the recent tidying of the

1152:

Yes, the name is at least a couple of hundred years old.

693:

village article. Sorry if I should have just deleted it.

2820:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

880:

Hi Halowithhorns89. Looks good to me. I would recommend:

702:

Hi - if this article was previously part of the article

336:

http://en.wikipedia.org/St_Nicolas%27_Church%2C_Abingdon

328:

http://en.wikipedia.org/St_Nicolas%27_Church%2C_Abingdon

3242: