731:
Policy is what we do, not what's written down and this does mean that what's written is not always 100% congruent with practise. I have always felt that 3RR is too punitive and enforced too strictly but I also see the logic that users (in general not you) would be revert warring left, right and centre if there wasn't an absolute consequence for starting up. If you had stopped at 2 there would have been no sanction applied. Unfortunately, the log is permanent unless you can persuade a dev to manually remove it was the database and I doubt that anyone would be interested. I think you just have to put this down to experience but (to paraphrase
Dmcdevit's comment to me after my block) wikipedia is very tolerant and there will be no long term consequences from this. Please don't get too upset about this (I was ready to leave after my block) just remember that its not the end of the world and the 'pedia will be waiting for when the block expires. If I unblock you now, will you categorically assure me that you won't edit that article for at least 24 hours?
721:
comply with the rule. There are additional exceptions in WP:3RR regarding BLP that I believe apply here, beyond the definitional exception I mentioned above. Finally, I attempted to engage my disputant in negotiation on the Talk page. I only reverted three times, and then gave up and walked away rather than violate the rule. I thought I was safely within the rule, and yet I was sanctioned anyway. Because of this sanction, it is no longer clear to me what constitutes "edit-warring." Either the admin should follow the rules specified on the WP:3RR page, or that policy should be rewritten to square with the way administrators are policing editors. While I am perfectly willing to sit out the block period, I would like to know if there is some way to remove this blot from my record. Thanks again for your response.
1578:
group terrorist via Google Books. I think the designation "terrorist" is either the consensus among scholars or at least the most widespread view, and I think the proposed language, while it doesn't say that, reflects it well enough. It can be tweaked a thousand times, of course, but I think it's a start that is ready to go into the article and can always be improved later. Please help me reach consensus on this, because I'd like to get it settled. I'm having a very hard time with
Wikidemon on other, related pages, but settling this one will be a start toward settling our differences on those other pages. Please take a look
179:
chair, Mimi Wesson, well enough to know that her part in it, at least was conducted in good faith and with integrity. I'm pretty sure she's one of those recommending the lesser suspension; but the fact she recommended suspension at all means quite a bit. Of course, my personal feelings about Dr. Wesson aren't encyclopedic either. Anyway, where something specific in the findings contradicts something that
Churchill (or other parties) had stated previously, we should make a point of presenting the committee opinion as well... which is exactly what you've done.
203:" citation style, since it allows complete citation details (as well as annotations, where appropriate). The main bio and the misconduct allegations are mostly there, other than your additions; the essay controversy one still needs to be converted, but I made a small first step. I'd appreciate it if you'd try to give more full citations... look at the examples elsewhere in the article (they're not all perfect, but you can find some good ones among them).
1414:, which seems rather strange for a contemporary encyclopedia. I seem to remember reading somewhere that the "Mestee" article is mostly one person's work who is trying to convert the world to that term and promote his own book. Is there a way to have "tri-racial isolate" stand alone, or be the first article, rather than a redirect? It means something to anthropologists and the issues of the term relate to
998:
2018:
1943:
1870:
551:
1282:
495:
1507:
If you have a question about why I am putting books onto pages you should question me rather than accuse of spamming. This book happens to be a very good reference for anybody looking to learn more about the
American Indian Movement. If I wanted to spam, I would add all of our books to wp. Please, if
1148:
What is your problem? The posts I added are not opinion, This is documented in the BIA findings thru the FOIA.. This is fact and I have a copy of it. Cohen's work was discredited by everyone with a degree. His work is flawed. This is also documented within the BIA. Joslyn has done his work 'pro bono'
208:
FWIW, I think your wording changes to the LaVelle/citation index point is good, and the annotations you added about subcommittee findings are also helpful. I'm not sure why MONGO took those out. I had expressed a concern to him about the anonymous editor who was blanking stuff, and I think possibly
178:
Mind you, I don't think the subcommittee is the "voice of god" either... they could be wrong also (for example, Churchill made a statement in
Counterpunch right after the release of the findings that continued to dispute the process and outcome). On the other hand, I know personally the subcommittee
1343:
I am not sure why you deleted the information about McMillan first offering the Lost Colony theory in 1885 when I sourced it with his bio from the North
Carolina Dictionary of Biography. His bio states that he offered the theory on the 300th anniversary of the founding of the colony and the year of
778:
Verkempt: Albion moonlight has started the process of having you, Verkempt, and myself, Getaway, investigated as either sockpuppets or meatpuppets of each other. Of course, this is wrong and it is merely an attempt to intimidate us into agreeing with any and all changes that Albion moonlight wants
441:
page. There is a location available for
Statements by editors previously involved in dispute. I have placed this notice on the talk page of the editors previously involved in the dispute to allow time for supplying these comments prior to requesting broad input from the Knowledge (XXG) community.
730:
If you check my block log you will see that I was blocked 9 months ago for a 3RR. On that occasion I only reverted 3 times but was tagged for an IP edit that I didn't do. Unfortunately, life isn't fair and sometimes even the best faithed user gets caught up in a situation in the heat of the moment.
299:
What a bullshit complaint. You have refused to negotiate for five days, have never offered a single substantive criticism, alternative edit, or new piece of evidence for this subsection. I authored most of the draft section. You have yet to propose or make a single edit to it. I submit that you are
182:
Oh, I saw that the copyright clearance on the old Post article you scanned was questioned. It might have been OK if you had tagged it as fair use or the like. But that might have been iffy too; as much as I think it's worth letting readers see, I suspect the Post really does have a legal right to
1577:
I've redone somewhat my original proposal, something I think can get consensus support. I think it's important that we have a section about the group being referred to as terrorist. You had mentioned that Google
Scholar has a lot of sources, and I'd prevously looked at a lot of sources calling the
1132:
A really GREAT 4 hours work on 'Jazz' on Oct 20, Verklempt. At last someone is starting to properly sort out, prioritise and clarify "Jazz" from being an all-over-the-place mess to, finally, a the beginnings of a good article: everyone should say 'Thank You' but, sadly, I can imagine all sorts of
1696:
Blanking massive sections of the WC Investigation article against the consensus of the every other editor than you has become vandalism, pure and simple. Any more of this crap, and I guess I'll run it up to a user conduct RfC. The fact is, your partisan personal position has no support from any
720:
Thanks for your response. I don't want to beat this into the ground -- I can take the suspension and sit out the 24 hours. However, I feel dishonored to have this block on my record, when according to my good faith reading I did not violate the 3R rule. Furthermore, I made a good faith effort to
693:
WP:3RR states in the "exceptions" section: "Since reverting in this context means undoing the actions of another editor or editors, reverting your own actions ("self-reverting") will not violate the rule." My initial edit was to undo my own actions (adding and then editing an external link that
201:
Hi
Verklempt, You've added some somewhat incomplete citations to the Churchil articles that I've tried to complete. In particular, you generally do not give URL links for readers to follow, nor complete author and title information. As well, I'd like to move all the articles towards using the
174:
Thanks for the good quality of changes you've made in the last day or two. We were slightly at loggerheads over some earlier edits (though those seem to get resolved OK); but the additions you've made recently are definitely NPOV and good quality, and I appreciate that. I definitely think the
636:
possible miscount? I did one initial edit, and then three reverts. In the initial edit, I removed material that I myself had inserted, once I realized that it violated policy. So I thought I was within the limit by only reverting three times. You are counting the initial edit as a revert? Why?
1882:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1955:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1649:. The intent is to decide as a content matter (and not as a behavioral issue regarding the editors involved) how to deal with this question. I am notifying you because you appear to have participated in or commented about this issue before. Feel free to participate. Thank you.
286:
Will Beback had the courtesy to move the "factionalization" section into a draft page, so that we could discuss and re-edit. I object to your mulish and aggravated refusal to cooperate with these efforts, and consider same to be a violation of Knowledge (XXG) good faith policies.
1103:
Yes, I think it's worth revisiting this issue. Unfortunately, I cannot do much about it right now -- I'm taking a wikibreak of sorts -- but I may be able to help in a few weeks, if you can wait till then. If not, please do go ahead and make the case, I think it's quite solid.
949:
I don't think that Wiki politicking substitutes for reason and evidence. This project would be better served if you addressed substantive issues and made constructive edits on topics that you have some expertise in, instead of trying to get your way by means of ad hominem
808:
Those 2 guys took it took there complaints about the 2 external links in question and inadvertently got the whole article deleted. I made the suggestion that TDC should do so but I didn't think he would play it that way. But I am very glad that he did.
133:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
183:
disallow it. I guess what I'll do is upload the scan to my own website, and change the image link to point there. If the Post complains at me, I'm not going to fight about taking it down... but most likely I can just do that "under the radar".
1490:
You recently took issue with some sourced content in the article, referring to it as POV, speculative, and incorrect. I was wondering if you know of any source which backs up your claim and contradicts the current article wording. Thanks,
1676:
and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. --
1167:
turn in to an edit war. You've reverted the same material twice, so please stop by the talk page so we can sort this out. I feel that with proper attribution the text should be OK, and don't know why you're so keen on removing it.
317:
The Atlanta Journal Constitution source you added to the article is excellent. After this stuff blows over, it should be readded to the subsection. We should take it one step at a time, though, and I might have to file another
1792:
Hi, Verklempt, are you off Knowledge (XXG) altogether? Sorry if that's the case, as you always added substance to the articles. I've worked on this article to correct inaccuracies, and would appreciate your viewpoint.
175:
findings of the CU subcommittee are very notable for inclusion. In summary for the main bio, but where they dispute/refute claims by Churchill or his proponents on the child article, we should point that out clearly.
2061:
1983:
1910:
841:
It is a wake up call, to inappropriate and heavy handed editing tactics by folks who have refused to follow the editing history and take it upon themselves to remove full articles without consulting with the other
1828:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
374:
and then immediately reverted same. The purpose of the DRAFT page is for discussion, not INSTANT REVERTS. I also noted that you have violated the WP:3RR rule. Please do not force me to submit this issue to an
242:
is essentially the same as others you keep reverting to. I have reverted your latest edit since it took out information that enhanced the article. Discuss appropriate changes in the discussion page. Thanks.--
1149:
over 15 years and along with other notable Genealogists, proved his work is flawed. Unless you can prove a college thesis holds more merit that years of experience and it's verifiable, leave it alone.
2045:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1967:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1894:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
479:
By the way the post doesn't refer to the documents, It only refers to newmans supposed investigation. So whose the illiterate one. I guess it doesn't matter now that Jaygy has blocked the article.
387:
It's a different page, silly. Furthermore, you're in the same boat. Finally, your edits are not in good faith. You know that yoru scources don't meet WP policy, even if your links weren't broken.
1508:
you have a problem with this again, go through the correct means of discussing the issue rather then editing. If you know nothing about the book than you have no room to justifiably remove it.
962:
Oh i can open one or expand this to include your POving if you want. This is mostly about your talkpage and edit summary conduct .. used to sidetrack and befuddle those who catch you out. --
2031:
779:
to make to the Ward Churchill articles. I just wanted to make you aware of this form of intimidation. We need to be cognizant of this attempt to intimidate and censor opinion.--
1597:
1231:
1645:
to discuss the matter of whether, how, and where we should use and cover the designation "terrorist" describe the Weathermen and their former leaders. It is located here:
1324:
Thanks for the "warning", but such nonsense still doesn't substitute for reason and evidence. Try to learn to construct an argument, and perhaps you'll do better in school.
364:
95:
859:
Please re-read this section as a whole. The time-sequence appears to be out of order. Note also that the first sentence isn't supported anywhere else in the section.
1771:
I only noticed today you added the Controversy section to his article, thanks for writing it. His article unfortunately was completely unbalanced without it. Cheers. --
1068:
438:
In preparation for an RFC at on the verifiability of the attribution of the the Rosa Luxemburg drawing to Ward Churchill, I have placed the appropriate section on the
137:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
409:
1034:
Please accept my apologies for the hasty reprimand - I was too trigger-happy after having come across several bad cases of vandalism that day. Sorry. Regards,
25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
1118:
Please try to take the time to engage in constructive dialog rather than reverting the edits of other users. You have done it twice. Please do not break 3RR.
1673:
1646:
694:
violates policy). A glance at the History will substantiate this. Thus my first edit would seem to fall squarely under the Exception according to my reading.
683:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
451:
78:
209:
MONGO got confused about which edits I was referring to. Though I obviously agree with MONGO on the need for citing the second investigation matter.
62:
463:
591:
668:
160:
703:
Technically you don't need to commit 4 reverts to be blocked. At the end of the day you revert warred, whether its 3 or 4 its still not on.
2084:
1997:
1924:
1853:
82:
530:
1704:
216:
190:
914:
1089:
Good, helpful - and sober and well-written - stuff in "Jazz" Verklempt: keep on going/improving, don/t be shouted-so-stupidly down
149:
1555:? I'm hoping that having such a category will make it easier to distinguish historical thinking in anarchism from current trends.
448:
satisfy the Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines , , and to support the claim that the drawing was created by Ward Churchill?
1053:
Sorry I haven't got back to you on this. Don't think I am ignoring it - I should have time to research it in the next few days.
517:
271:
1292:
2080:
1993:
1920:
1849:
586:
2054:
1976:
1903:
130:
47:
22:
1571:
987:
You defused a potential edit war pursuant to the Peltier article. Good rewrite: A very neutralizing move on you part. Thanx.
529:}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from
81:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
239:
1698:
1025:
I actually deleted incorrect information that was not sourced whatsoever. This is not vandalism, my friend. It is editing.
210:
184:
144:
1786:
1202:
1840:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1304:
1010:
564:
502:
67:
2066:
1988:
1915:
1845:
1598:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wikidemon being disruptive after refusing to recognize consensus
459:
558:
1736:
1383:
I've made some edits in the article. Who knows, we might actually be able to get it back up to FA level after all.
563:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1192:
42:
1501:
2042:
1964:
1891:
346:
Afterall, the AJC is a well-known non-biased source, with exemplars of “neutrality” such as Cynthia Tucker. --
74:
1631:
791:
It's hard for me to get too concerned about folks who come onto the intellectual battlefield totally unarmed.
1596:
Wikidemon has refused to accept the consensus of three editors to his one. I've reported his actions at See
1217:
605:
1697:
other editors, and asinine comments about your "consensus of one" don't substitute for seeking consensus.
455:
1841:
1349:
1002:
819:
I most certainly did not agree with the deletion of the whole article, and will try and get it restored.
1776:
1732:
1090:
988:
830:
810:
910:
101:
In the above deletion discussion, you recommended a speedy delete. Can you please specify which of the
57:
1134:
909:
has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge (XXG). The RFC entry can be found by your name in
1312:
1188:
1173:
1150:
268:
2025:
1951:
1878:
1817:
1808:
1669:
1345:
1230:
Hello, Verklempt. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
1798:
1654:
1525:
You're violating the Conflict of Interest policy. I will continue to remove your advertising edits.
1427:
971:
935:
885:
2038:
1960:
1887:
1837:
1821:
1404:
1210:
405:
1242:
You were asked a very simple question and you refused to answer it - fine. But don't engage in
1509:
1682:
1627:
1605:
1587:
1560:
1251:
421:
331:
2050:
1972:
1899:
1833:
1825:
1140:..... & it came: what a sad pity this would seem to be for "Jazz".... hope I'm POV free?
2073:
1772:
1471:
1395:
750:
Thank you for the reassuring words. No need to unblock me. I should probably take the break.
677:
535:
2053:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2046:
1975:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1968:
1902:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1895:
1836:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1829:
1642:
1243:
906:
513:
319:
257:
235:
228:
134:
102:
1308:
1296:
1169:
1119:
480:
376:
347:
288:
265:
26:
1794:
1746:
1716:
1650:
1548:
1526:
1513:
1440:
1423:
1387:
1362:
1325:
1264:
1105:
1035:
1026:
1014:
963:
951:
927:
902:
877:
792:
751:
722:
695:
638:
569:
388:
301:
156:
29:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
997:
1484:
1072:
860:
52:
446:
115:
tag? If you find that the page does not meet the criteria, please change your vote.
1678:
1623:
1601:
1583:
1556:
1492:
1247:
843:
780:
760:
732:
704:
655:
414:
324:
2017:
1942:
1869:
1619:
I appreciate your comments there. I think you got confused with this edit though:
434:
Request for Comment: Verifiability as to the creator of the Rosa Luxemburg drawing
367:
is in contravention of the agreement posted at the SCV article Talk page. Thanks.
1460:
1391:
1054:
116:
109:
86:
1281:
243:
35:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
1731:
I agree with Lulu. You need put your personal feelings about WC behind you. :
1263:
I characterized your rhetoric, not your person. Learn to tell the difference.
876:
I wish to open a 'request for comment' on your uncivil and abuse behaviour. -
1415:
1164:
1361:
That source is incorrect. McMillan did not publish the pamphlet until 1888.
494:
1307:
for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
820:
264:
article, which I know you have edited. Your input would be appreciated.--
2057:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1979:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1906:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
654:
all 4 edits involved your removing links so all count towards the 3RR —
105:
that the page meets, and ideally also tag the page with the appropriate
2088:
2035:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2001:
1928:
1857:
1824:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1802:
1780:
1754:
1740:
1724:
1709:
1686:
1658:
1615:
I think you just removed Wikidemo's comment by mistake on the AN/I page
1609:
1591:
1564:
1534:
1517:
1495:
1478:
1457:
Cease the edit war on the Choctaw article, now, or you'll get blocked.
1448:
1431:
1398:
1370:
1353:
1316:
1272:
1255:
1225:
1196:
1177:
1153:
1137:
1122:
1108:
1093:
1075:
1057:
1038:
1029:
1017:
991:
977:
954:
941:
891:
863:
846:
833:
823:
813:
795:
783:
763:
754:
735:
725:
707:
698:
658:
641:
544:
483:
467:
428:
391:
379:
350:
338:
304:
291:
276:
246:
221:
195:
164:
119:
89:
125:
Image copyright problem with Image:Churchill,DenverPost1987article.gif
1419:
1411:
1163:
I'm really just waring you as formality, but don't let this thing at
261:
363:
Please read over Wikipedias three revert rule. Your latest edit to
1715:
Repeating your bogus allegations does not make them any more true.
2070:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2060:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1982:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1909:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
140:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
2029:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
1745:
Try to focus on the issues. Also look up "ad hominem fallacy".
1234:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
1005:
pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you
1668:
This is a message sent to a number of editors, and following
829:
The reason I am glad is because it serves as a wakeup call.
549:
493:
1547:
Hi Verkempt. Is there a reason you reverted my addition of
1071:
has been resolved and archived. Thanks for participating.
665:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
685:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
2041:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1963:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1890:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1637:
RfC on Weathermen, Ayers, Dohrm, Obama, and "terrorism"
1620:
1579:
619:
615:
609:
600:
596:
582:
578:
574:
439:
1232:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
96:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Robert Robideau
1664:
Please take another look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC
1069:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Commodore Sloat
557:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1614:
521:. To contest this block, please reply here on your
300:
the one who is refusing to cooperate in good faith.
410:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Fix Bayonets!
365:Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans/factionalization
1816:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1570:Please see new proposed language on terrorism at
1208:I think you're going to need an RfC, after all.
159:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
915:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Verklempt
897:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Verklempt)
8:
1674:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC
1647:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC
1099:Ward Churchill, conspiracy theorist category
913:, and the actual discussion can be found at
370:Moreover, you had asked for my contibutions
1572:Talk:Weatherman (organization)#New proposal
322:on it (obviously, it will be supported). ·
282:Please do not continue reverting SCV artcle
85:, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
2012:
1672:requirements: Please take another look at
1582:. And thanks for your interest so far. --
408:user conduct rfc, which I started today.
404:Hi Verklempt. I invite you to comment on
73:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1439:I agree, but I don't know how to do this.
1187:Thanks for fixing the vandalism on 12/5.
161:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
131:Image:Churchill,DenverPost1987article.gif
38:Here are a few good links for newcomers:
774:Albion moonlight & False Allegations
83:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
1344:his election to the General Assembly.
240:Ward Churchill misconduct allegations
7:
2026:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
1952:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1879:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
917:, where you may want to participate.
412:. Thanks for any input you have. ·
150:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
2043:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2009:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
1965:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1892:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1641:Please note that I have created an
43:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1936:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1863:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
1842:review the candidates' statements
1067:I'm writing to let you know that
2016:
1949:Hello, Verklempt. Voting in the
1941:
1876:Hello, Verklempt. Voting in the
1868:
1280:
1001:Please stop. If you continue to
996:
518:Ward Churchill misconduct issues
145:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
2064:and submit your choices on the
1986:and submit your choices on the
1913:and submit your choices on the
1410:Someone has redirected this to
1390:& respond there? Thanks. -
1013:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
155:This is an automated notice by
1848:. For the Election committee,
1818:Arbitration Committee election
1809:ArbCom elections are now open!
1755:16:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1741:08:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1725:22:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
1710:22:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
1687:02:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
1109:13:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
1094:16:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1039:10:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
2089:00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
2002:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1858:13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1659:20:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
1632:00:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
1610:19:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
1592:16:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
1543:Ward Churchill categorization
1388:Talk:Blackface#Legacy section
1178:03:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
1154:23:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
525:by adding the text {{unblock|
445:Does the source provided for
1929:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1803:14:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
1787:MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians
1781:22:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
1226:19:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
1203:MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians
1197:13:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
1138:11:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1123:22:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
821:Torturous Devastating Cudgel
468:23:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
429:05:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
392:00:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
380:00:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
351:23:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
339:22:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
305:21:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
292:21:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
236:Wikipedias three revert rule
120:12:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
103:criteria for speedy deletion
90:12:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
63:How to write a great article
1844:and submit your choices on
1565:12:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
1535:21:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1518:21:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1297:Talk:Plagiarism#Dershowtitz
1076:23:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
1058:20:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
1030:23:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
1018:19:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
992:08:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
561:, who declined the request.
277:20:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
2109:
2081:MediaWiki message delivery
1994:MediaWiki message delivery
1921:MediaWiki message delivery
1850:MediaWiki message delivery
1557:Nathan McKnight -- Aelffin
1553:Category:Living anarchists
1183:Ramapough Mountain Indians
1144:Ramapough Mountain Indians
978:12:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
955:07:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
942:00:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
892:00:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
484:03:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1386:Could you take a look at
1317:21:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
1291:The next time you make a
1273:22:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
1256:03:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
905:. Please be aware that a
864:21:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
847:01:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
834:21:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
824:16:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
814:09:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
796:20:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
784:19:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
669:guide to appealing blocks
247:04:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
170:Good changes to Churchill
27:Knowledge (XXG) Boot Camp
2078:to your user talk page.
1750:
1720:
1530:
1502:American Indian Movement
1496:13:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
1479:02:19, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
1449:20:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1444:
1432:21:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1366:
1329:
1268:
764:19:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
755:19:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
736:19:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
726:19:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
708:18:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
699:18:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
659:18:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
642:18:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
545:03:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
222:19:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
202:m:Cite.php "<ref: -->
196:01:33, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1399:05:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1371:20:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
1354:15:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
372:ON THE ABOVE DRAFT PAGE
165:06:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
554:
498:
238:. Your latest edit to
21:Hello, Verklempt, and
2039:Arbitration Committee
2023:Hello! Voting in the
1961:Arbitration Committee
1888:Arbitration Committee
1822:Arbitration Committee
606:change block settings
553:
497:
454:comment was added by
129:Thanks for uploading
907:request for comments
759:OK then, take care.
1826:arbitration process
1422:and other groups.--
1133:stuff to come.... !
872:Request for comment
2055:arbitration policy
1977:arbitration policy
1904:arbitration policy
1838:arbitration policy
1692:Stop the vandalism
1405:Tri-racial isolate
637:Thanks, Verklempt.
555:
499:
406:User:Fix Bayonets!
256:Hey, I started an
48:How to edit a page
2096:
2095:
2091:
855:Misconduct issues
514:three-revert rule
508:twenty-four hours
471:
456:Uncle uncle uncle
274:
234:Please read over
2100:
2079:
2077:
2020:
2013:
1945:
1872:
1733:Albion moonlight
1707:
1701:
1477:
1474:
1468:
1284:
1244:personal attacks
1224:
1220:
1213:
1000:
989:Albion moonlight
976:
974:
967:
940:
938:
931:
890:
888:
881:
831:Albion moonlight
811:Albion moonlight
804:TDC AND THE BLOG
682:
676:
625:
623:
612:
594:
592:deleted contribs
552:
541:
538:
527:your reason here
506:for a period of
449:
424:
417:
400:User conduct rfc
375:Administrator.--
334:
327:
272:
219:
213:
193:
187:
114:
108:
33:
2108:
2107:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2071:
2011:
2006:
2005:
1946:
1938:
1933:
1932:
1873:
1865:
1846:the voting page
1812:
1790:
1769:
1767:Barry Goldwater
1705:
1699:
1694:
1666:
1639:
1617:
1575:
1545:
1505:
1488:
1472:
1461:
1458:
1408:
1381:
1341:
1293:personal attack
1240:
1223:
1218:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1189:Ramapoughnative
1185:
1161:
1151:Ramapoughnative
1146:
1130:
1116:
1101:
1087:
1065:
1051:
985:
972:
970:
965:
936:
934:
929:
899:
886:
884:
879:
874:
857:
806:
776:
688:
680:
674:
673:, then use the
662:
645:
613:
603:
589:
572:
565:blocking policy
550:
547:
539:
536:
491:
477:
450:—The preceding
436:
422:
415:
402:
361:
332:
325:
315:
284:
254:
232:
217:
211:
191:
185:
172:
127:
112:
106:
99:
68:Manual of Style
31:
12:
11:
5:
2106:
2104:
2094:
2093:
2062:the candidates
2032:eligible users
2021:
2010:
2007:
1984:the candidates
1947:
1940:
1939:
1937:
1934:
1911:the candidates
1874:
1867:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1815:
1811:
1806:
1789:
1784:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1693:
1690:
1665:
1662:
1638:
1635:
1616:
1613:
1574:
1568:
1549:Ward Churchill
1544:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1504:
1499:
1487:
1482:
1456:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1407:
1402:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1295:as you did at
1290:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1239:
1236:
1215:
1205:
1200:
1184:
1181:
1160:
1157:
1145:
1142:
1129:
1126:
1115:
1112:
1100:
1097:
1086:
1083:
1064:
1061:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
984:
981:
960:
959:
958:
957:
898:
895:
873:
870:
868:
856:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
827:
826:
805:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
775:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
713:
712:
711:
710:
701:
663:
652:
648:Decline reason
634:
630:Request reason
627:
548:
512:violating the
501:You have been
492:
490:
487:
476:
473:
435:
432:
401:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
314:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
283:
280:
253:
250:
231:
226:
225:
224:
205:
204:
171:
168:
153:
152:
147:
126:
123:
98:
93:
79:sign your name
71:
70:
65:
60:
55:
50:
45:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2105:
2092:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2075:
2069:
2068:
2063:
2058:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2034:
2033:
2028:
2027:
2022:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2008:
2004:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1944:
1935:
1931:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1871:
1862:
1860:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1766:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1702:
1691:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1675:
1671:
1663:
1661:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1573:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1542:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1486:
1485:Assata Shakur
1483:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1469:
1467:
1465:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1378:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1338:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1288:
1285:This is your
1283:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1237:
1235:
1233:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1221:
1214:
1212:Corvus cornix
1204:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1182:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1166:
1158:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1143:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1127:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1113:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1098:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1091:217.42.99.130
1084:
1082:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1048:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
999:
994:
993:
990:
983:Good rewrite.
982:
980:
979:
975:
969:
968:
956:
953:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
933:
932:
924:
922:
920:
918:
916:
912:
908:
904:
896:
894:
893:
889:
883:
882:
871:
869:
866:
865:
862:
854:
848:
845:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
832:
825:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
812:
803:
797:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
782:
773:
765:
762:
758:
757:
756:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
737:
734:
729:
728:
727:
724:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
709:
706:
702:
700:
697:
692:
691:
690:
689:
687:
686:
679:
672:
670:
661:
660:
657:
651:
649:
644:
643:
640:
633:
631:
626:
621:
617:
611:
607:
602:
598:
593:
588:
584:
583:global blocks
580:
579:active blocks
576:
571:
566:
562:
560:
559:administrator
546:
543:
542:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
515:
509:
505:
504:
496:
488:
486:
485:
482:
474:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
447:
443:
440:
433:
431:
430:
426:
425:
419:
418:
416:j e r s y k o
411:
407:
399:
393:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
373:
368:
366:
358:
352:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
336:
335:
329:
328:
326:j e r s y k o
321:
312:
306:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
281:
279:
278:
275:
269:
267:
263:
259:
251:
249:
248:
245:
241:
237:
230:
227:
223:
220:
214:
207:
206:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
188:
180:
176:
169:
167:
166:
162:
158:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
141:
138:
136:
135:copyright tag
132:
124:
122:
121:
118:
111:
104:
97:
94:
92:
91:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
39:
36:
34:
28:
24:
19:
18:
2065:
2059:
2036:
2030:
2024:
1987:
1981:
1958:
1950:
1948:
1914:
1908:
1885:
1877:
1875:
1813:
1791:
1770:
1695:
1667:
1640:
1618:
1595:
1576:
1552:
1546:
1506:
1489:
1463:
1462:
1455:
1409:
1385:
1382:
1342:
1300:
1287:only warning
1286:
1279:
1241:
1229:
1216:
1207:
1186:
1162:
1147:
1131:
1117:
1102:
1088:
1079:
1066:
1052:
1006:
995:
986:
964:
961:
928:
925:
923:
921:
919:
900:
878:
875:
867:
858:
828:
807:
777:
684:
666:
664:
653:
647:
646:
635:
629:
628:
601:creation log
568:
556:
534:
526:
522:
511:
507:
500:
478:
444:
437:
420:
413:
403:
371:
369:
362:
330:
323:
316:
285:
255:
233:
181:
177:
173:
154:
139:
128:
100:
72:
37:
30:
20:
16:
15:
2067:voting page
1989:voting page
1916:voting page
1773:Maarten1963
1135:81.156.1.40
475:Denver Post
2051:topic bans
1973:topic bans
1900:topic bans
1834:topic bans
1670:WP:CANVASS
1309:Groupthink
1170:futurebird
1120:futurebird
1049:Racial IDs
842:editors.--
597:filter log
481:annoynmous
377:Black Flag
348:Black Flag
289:Black Flag
266:CĂşchullain
75:Wikipedian
53:Help pages
32:{{helpme}}
2047:site bans
1969:site bans
1896:site bans
1830:site bans
1795:Parkwells
1747:Verklempt
1717:Verklempt
1651:Wikidemon
1527:Verklempt
1441:Verklempt
1424:Parkwells
1416:Melungeon
1379:Blackface
1363:Verklempt
1346:BIAIntern
1326:Verklempt
1265:Verklempt
1165:blackface
1106:Turgidson
1036:Technopat
1027:Verklempt
1015:Technopat
1003:vandalize
952:Verklempt
911:this list
903:Verklempt
793:Verklempt
752:Verklempt
723:Verklempt
696:Verklempt
667:read the
639:Verklempt
616:checkuser
575:block log
570:Verklempt
531:this list
523:talk page
389:Verklempt
302:Verklempt
157:OrphanBot
77:! Please
1073:Bigglove
966:maxrspct
950:tactics.
930:maxrspct
880:maxrspct
861:Rklawton
587:contribs
464:contribs
452:unsigned
260:for the
58:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
2074:NoACEMM
1679:Noroton
1624:Noroton
1602:Noroton
1584:Noroton
1493:Savidan
1305:blocked
1248:ElKevbo
1238:Warning
1159:Warning
1011:blocked
973:ping me
937:ping me
901:Hello,
887:ping me
844:Getaway
781:Getaway
761:Spartaz
733:Spartaz
705:Spartaz
678:unblock
656:Spartaz
610:unblock
503:blocked
489:Blocked
23:welcome
1820:. The
1420:Lumbee
1412:Mestee
1392:Jmabel
1339:Lumbee
1299:, you
1055:Vizjim
540:abjotu
359:WP:3RR
262:Lumbee
252:Lumbee
229:WP:3RR
117:Stifle
87:Stifle
1700:LotLE
1600:. --
1466:levse
1246:. --
671:first
537:tariq
533:. --
244:MONGO
212:LotLE
186:LotLE
2085:talk
2037:The
1998:talk
1959:The
1925:talk
1886:The
1854:talk
1799:talk
1777:talk
1751:talk
1737:talk
1721:talk
1706:talk
1683:talk
1655:talk
1628:talk
1606:talk
1588:talk
1580:here
1561:talk
1531:talk
1514:talk
1510:TTUP
1473:Talk
1445:talk
1428:talk
1396:Talk
1367:talk
1350:talk
1330:talk
1313:talk
1301:will
1269:talk
1252:talk
1219:talk
1193:talk
1174:talk
1128:Jazz
1114:Jazz
1085:Jazz
1007:will
510:for
460:talk
423:talk
333:talk
218:talk
192:talk
1814:Hi,
1643:RfC
1622:--
1551:to
1303:be
1063:RFC
1009:be
926:--
620:log
567:).
516:on
320:RFC
313:SCV
258:RfC
2087:)
2076:}}
2072:{{
2049:,
2000:)
1992:.
1971:,
1927:)
1919:.
1898:,
1856:)
1832:,
1801:)
1793:--
1779:)
1753:)
1739:)
1723:)
1685:)
1657:)
1630:)
1608:)
1590:)
1563:)
1533:)
1516:)
1476:•
1470:•
1459:—
1447:)
1430:)
1418:,
1394:|
1369:)
1352:)
1315:)
1289:.
1271:)
1254:)
1195:)
1176:)
1081:]
681:}}
675:{{
650::
632::
614:•
608:•
604:•
599:•
595:•
590:•
585:•
581:•
577:•
466:)
462:•
427:·
337:·
287:--
163:.
113:}}
110:db
107:{{
2083:(
1996:(
1923:(
1852:(
1797:(
1775:(
1749:(
1735:(
1719:(
1703:Ă—
1681:(
1653:(
1626:(
1604:(
1586:(
1559:(
1529:(
1512:(
1464:R
1443:(
1426:(
1365:(
1348:(
1332:)
1328:(
1311:(
1267:(
1250:(
1191:(
1172:(
624:)
622:)
618:(
573:(
470:.
458:(
273:c
270:/
215:Ă—
189:Ă—
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.