59:, Thanks for your comments. I feel the article was rejected because its type was charged from draft to article as per the rejection comments. There are enough references cited from leading newspaper publications on the subject. If you can suggest some improvements that can be made than it would be very helpful. For now I have resubmitted the draft. As advised by you, I have also posted in teahouse for feedback for improvement. Thanks again for your comment.
175:. I'm new here and am learning. After I moved the draft to article, there was a message on top page about pending review so I thought it was fine. After it was moved back to draft state, I realised my previous account was not correct. Also I cleaned my talk page because other I feel something action pending with me. I'll not clean it going forward. Is there a way to archive them? Lastly thanks once again for your explanations and help. Much appreciated.
199:
298:
33:
78:
I have not reviewed the article in detail. The history of the article is that you first created it in article space, and it was then moved back to draft space, and you then moved it unilaterally to article space after adding references. It would have been better if you had waited for another
149:
done as well as you think you have. So when you're improving a draft that's previously been rejected, your next step after that is not "move the page yourself", it is "resubmit to AFC for another kick at the review can".
94:
Also, it is difficult to have a discussion with you on your talk page because you remove posts from your talk page. That is permitted but discouraged, and makes discussion difficult, so any further discussion can be at
448:
335:
446:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
220:
348:
353:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
436:
392:
385:
322:
242:
367:
If you now believe the draft cannot meet
Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
253:
87:
or other neutral editors, or wait for a review, rather than moving it back to article space. I see that you say that you are asking at
304:
285:
344:
328:
133:
sources (like blogs, or the person's own social networking profiles) is all they have to do — so regardless of how well you
412:
340:
462:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
113:
Please note that even if you add references to the article, you still must resubmit the draft for assessment by an AFC
207:
104:
47:
368:
361:
289:
39:
24:
307:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by
Theroadislong was:
238:
467:
422:
351:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for
Knowledge.
246:
231:
224:
212:
384:
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
310:
168:
100:
56:
43:
125:. Not all possible sources out there are necessarily always notability-building sources, and people
463:
458:
418:
216:
343:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
155:
381:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
269:
259:
198:
375:
176:
60:
96:
88:
38:
I've left a comment on your
Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
20:
172:
151:
84:
80:
79:
reviewer to review it and see if it could be accepted and moved to article space.
435:
297:
83:
then moved it back to draft space again. You should either discuss it with
252:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
256:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
471:
426:
277:
184:
159:
108:
68:
51:
456:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
137:
you've done at bolstering his notability with better sources, an AFC
32:
237:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
360:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
395:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
296:
197:
31:
317:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
309:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
121:
entitled to just immediately move the page into mainspace
371:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "
413:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
405:
397:
364:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
391:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
245:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
221:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Advait.kansal
129:erroneously think that just adding one or two
8:
341:guidelines on the notability of people
7:
303:Your recent article submission to
223:. Note that multiple accounts are
14:
311:qualifies for a Knowledge article
434:
449:Articles for creation help desk
399:Articles for creation help desk
219:per the evidence presented at
1:
211:temporarily from editing for
472:12:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
427:12:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
355:when they have been resolved
278:12:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
313:—that is, they do not show
185:20:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
160:17:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
109:17:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
69:15:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
52:19:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
491:
369:Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey
362:Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey
40:Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey
25:Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey
254:guide to appealing blocks
247:make useful contributions
213:abusing multiple accounts
339:of the subject (see the
180:
91:. That is a good idea.
64:
193:Blocked as a sockpuppet
301:
202:
36:
305:Articles for Creation
300:
286:Articles for creation
264:Your reason here ~~~~
201:
99:or somewhere else.
35:
407:reviewer's talk page
290:Vijay Shankar Pandey
284:Your submission at
215:as a sockpuppet of
452:. If you have any
302:
217:User:Advait.kansal
203:
37:
478:
477:
393:untoward behavior
349:mistakes to avoid
333:sources that are
27:has a new comment
482:
438:
431:
430:
410:
402:
380:
374:
347:and learn about
267:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
474:
429:
404:
396:
378:
372:
352:
294:
281:
280:
257:
250:
195:
169:Robert McClenon
145:whether you've
101:Robert McClenon
76:
57:Robert McClenon
54:
44:Robert McClenon
29:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
476:
475:
441:
439:
417:
416:
389:
386:may be deleted
382:
365:
345:technical help
308:
295:
293:
282:
251:
205:You have been
204:
196:
194:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
75:
72:
30:
28:
23:notification:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
473:
469:
465:
464:Theroadislong
461:
460:
455:
451:
450:
445:
440:
437:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:Theroadislong
414:
409:
408:
401:
400:
394:
390:
387:
383:
377:
370:
366:
363:
359:
358:
356:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
332:
331:
326:
325:
320:
316:
312:
306:
299:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
274:
265:
261:
255:
248:
244:
240:
236:
234:
233:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
200:
192:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:Thanks a lot
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
141:still has to
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
110:
106:
102:
98:
92:
90:
86:
82:
74:Clarification
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
58:
53:
49:
45:
41:
34:
26:
22:
19:
17:
457:
453:
447:
443:
406:
398:
354:
334:
329:
323:
318:
314:
292:(October 28)
272:
271:
263:
232:illegitimate
230:
228:
206:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
112:
97:the Teahouse
93:
89:the Teahouse
85:User:Bearcat
81:User:Bearcat
77:
55:
15:
336:independent
315:significant
117:, and are
42:. Thanks!
444:Vinod2608
403:, on the
330:secondary
319:published
177:Vinod2608
61:Vinod2608
459:Teahouse
324:reliable
262:|reason=
239:reverted
229:not for
139:reviewer
123:yourself
115:reviewer
442:Hello,
411:or use
270:Dreamy
260:unblock
243:deleted
235:reasons
225:allowed
208:blocked
173:Bearcat
152:Bearcat
227:, but
147:really
143:assess
454:other
376:Db-g7
135:think
127:often
468:talk
423:talk
273:Jazz
181:talk
171:and
156:talk
105:talk
65:talk
48:talk
268:.
241:or
131:bad
119:not
21:AfC
470:)
425:)
379:}}
373:{{
357:.
327:,
321:,
288::
266:}}
258:{{
249:.
183:)
158:)
107:)
67:)
50:)
466:(
421:(
415:.
388:.
179:(
154:(
103:(
63:(
46:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
