1160:), which discusses the censorship of relevant international news by the "oft-ethnocentric" American media. Even though it's a slam on America, I enjoyed it nonetheless (I thought that may be a ringing endorsement ;-)). It reveals and analyzes stories such as the genocide in the DPRC, Halliburton's interests in Iran's nuclear program, and the bombing of a Pakistani village by U.S. warplanes. My favorite part, however, was the side-by-side comparison of two news stories on the same date, and which one recieved more news coverage. Typically, the story about
2412:
for my direct tone, but that does not mean my every opinion is trashed. Harshness and evil intention are two different things. You cant simply expect every person to do left right left right according to your expectations. There can be direct tones, indirect, honest and dishonest, Depending upon the knowledge and nature of person. So I got the severe reaction upon the highly biased teaming against
Muslims here. One example you know already, i.e. Arrow740 AKA FFI Agent.
22:
2606:
1897:"they just dont rely on CNN ans Sky's dumbshit". Well in your civil opinion, CNN and SKY recite some holy scripture while I consider them pathetic. I did not use any incivil word for you in this conversation as far as I remember, nor did I use for other users yet. But anyway, there is no point to debate with you. Because you can only talk on the offtopic subjects, i.e.:
2038:
videos do NOT have anything to do about some specific wikipedia article, so dont apply POV/NPOV obsession on that. If you want only wikipedia articles discussed on your talk, then in that case I have requested you to diregard the videos I refered and excuse me that I wrote something on your page which was not related to wikipedia articles. ok? still not happy?
1864:
American and is a nonMuslim, if disagrees with you then that is a bias? How nice. There are replies to these 'biased' videos you can see those. IF not, then as I said I am not forcing you at gunpoint to learn something. If you dont like my refereces then do give a damn and do your work and dont bother to waste your time in writing on my talk page.
1565:
2411:
Over that this kid
Hojimachong does not have a tiny respect. He is now apologzing other user Twaru and again the justification is that I am evil so he had to assume other people to be my sockpuppets. InBC !! I still dont expect any fair decision from you. I appreciate that I was being tolerated a bit
1790:
looking through your list of contributions, I was hard-pressed to find an edit that was not reverted within five minutes, or was not blatantly POV. I'm having a hard time realizing why you are here if not to contribute. You've been directed to enough links that you should be able to write great prose
1749:
Let's pretend for a minute that the U.S. Military didn't drop leaflets and use loudspeakers to tell citizens to evacuate the city, permitting over 70,000 citizens to leave. That was the justification for shooting the 10-year-old children... because
Mujahiddeen sent out 10-year-olds with AK's to shoot
319:
Knowledge (XXG) allow to change your account. Hence it is possible that he was already registered (not blocked) and then leave one account (without any violation) and started using another. No violation of rules whatsoever. Secondly he might be active with IP address. There is at least one IP address
251:
when he abused me. He was not Muslim and I was Muslim but still they apply the standard equally. I myself never got blocked even if I give Islam always first perference. I will also report them when they violate any rule or make any personal attack. I will report anyone if required. Lastly, two rules
98:
Proabivouac! I thought my IP address can be tracked if I used this sockpuppet? Do you have any source to prove your baseless allegation that I used sockpuppet to unban me? If yes, then I am happy to be banned at my IP forever. And if you dont have prove then you better know what should be the panalty
880:
Work is significant and not the appearance. Giving 25% space to an image on the top part of article means that
Muhammad's 25% was about appearance, which is totally wrong as all people know here. And even over that, we dont have a factual image but a false image having clashes with the article which
213:
I was'nt talking about the
Justice in which I am not banned. Nobody can ban me for the reason of sockpuppeting when nobody has proof. I was talking about what do these admins do to the people who attempted to bring a case to ban me on the basis of 'no basis', and not only that they messaged multiple
1730:
Hey i dont like the images as much as any other muslim, but there is a wikipedia no censorship policy that is plain and oh so clear. It clearly states that even though some content may offend readers (like me) it has the perfect right to be in wikipedia. Regarding the matters of putting pictures in
845:
Hi
VirtualEye, since you are currently blocked, if you like I can post your responses to this poll by proxy. You could tell me which one's you wish to support and I would put your signature and a link back to the diff where you told me which one's you wish to support. Or if you prefer I am sure the
544:
I have infact made it pov by giving the critism part some considerable weight. And I did not add my POV nor did I add any third person's POV but I have given the 'word by word' texts from the athored books of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed. What kind of POV is it where I am giving the unaltered reference from
525:
Please do not add POV statement in the artical, this artical being after a long process and long edit war came to a settlement over the nature of this artical. you addition of this para including statemens like, Mirza Ghulam threathed people who dont belief in his "false" claims..is a POV statement
466:
anyhow; at worst your block would have been extended, and probably just reset. It's an entirely natural impulse to evade a block in this way, and hardly an uncommon mistake for a fairly new user to make. Perhaps you weren't aware of the sockpuppet policy; now you are. I just told you not to do it,
400:
Do you think that is justifiable to say it that if he do not AGF then so is me?? His arguments are not baseless and it is a kind of personal attack too. They might be baseless for you but may be good for me. Hence do not think that where you stand only that is the right view of the world. Anyway I
2037:
No, these videos are not biased but are the symbol of reaction about cruelty and hypocrisy, the reactions might be exaggerated and aggressive but that does not mean you trash them with your broom of 'wikipedia rules'. Looks like someone got a hysteria for 'NPOV'. I had already told you that these
1810:
And about your moaning of my edits. The reason of the reverts of my edits is the same reason due to which wikipedia is highly biased. i.e. very very minor ratio of Muslim wikipedians with respect to the huge number of nonmuslim wikipedians here. How in the world can you claim wikipeida to be NPOV
1784:
As for being young "scary" kids, are you to say that the
Jihadists in Iraq aren't "scary"? Honestly. I don't see the point of carrying on a conversation with you when you criticize international news media, and direct me to documentaries which leave out any information that disagrees with it (the
2407:
No matter I have different POV as compared to
Hojimachong and Pro, and I am a bit direct and harsh but that does not mean people start making evil coallition against me. Now you would object I am not having good faith. How in world should I assume other people at good faith if they are spreading
2239:
I came for personal discussion not about wikipedia. So I did a mistake by sending video references which are not related to wikipedia articles. So I asked for an excuse and asked you to disregard the those videos. UNDERSTOOD? I think you are really pissed off by your school teacher. You are very
2195:
I think you are confusing yourself. Sometimes you say wikipedia rules apply then at the same time you ask me talk about the things which are not related to wikipedia. Either apply wikipedia rules and discard the videos or accept that you cant apply wikipedia rules on this non-wikipedian content.
1863:
Can you please refer where did I use incivil language? I think you did not read my complete post with your open eyes. I had told that there are video responses of people to these video I refered. You could watch the POV or the other people who responded to these videos. Any person who even is an
1806:
You simply cant comprehend my point. There is MORE to the world than your CNN and SKY, that I had been trying to put in your novice head since ages. I dont buy just single sourced media hypocrisy that is why I refered you highly diverse sources of videos made by
Americans themselves and not some
1757:
I have ever heard. We don't really have justification to use the weapons, but the fighters there (of whom many were most likely Al-Qaeda and other extremist groups) aren't really in a position to accuse us of disobeying the laws of war. Dressing up as civilians to bomb innocents. Disobeying the
1301:
Sorry if you have the right to block/unblock then you should automatically be titled to see the information. Or please ask some admin. I dont consider it appropriate to publish my info on the page for everyone. I would rather open my info to that admin who is totally considered unbiased. Sorry.
189:
and I totally trust him. I think you are very cool person but have to be bit more careful with your selection of words and understand wikipedia rules better. Things you say I agree with totally but selection of words are sometimes wrong. Furthermore, remember we usually can NOT edit a User page
1185:
Ok, Thanks for recommendation. Its good you are looking out of the
American-bubble now. I will try the book if I manage. Usually I have a lot of material to read/watch and post too, and let me tell you that I am not incivil on other forums upon disagreement, as I have to be here. Why? because
234:
Well! that is not a big crime to report anyone even to multiple admins. Secondly, we can say that they are reporting you because they know you (if we assume good faith towards them). A person who do not know you (your edits) cannot report you. We have to always assume good faith. Not because
190:
unless it has some violation of wikipedia rule on it or User allow others to edit its page. The joke you have made on User-page might be okay on talk page but was bad on User page (not allowed). Also a joke which was made could have been taken wrongly hence one should avoid things
545:
his own books? Can you call it unjustified or wrong? You must know that there is much more critism that I have not included so that it remains NPOV. But just giving onesided detail of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is highly biased, as if the article was written by some of Mirza's followers.
1828:
I'd like to point out that I am one of the only editors who still engages in conversation with you, trying to have civilized conversation, even though you berate me, send biased videos (not that CNN and Sky are not biased, but your videos certainly are as well), and swear on my
1817:
The videos I refered for your benefit. You did not see but decided to come attack me. If you dont like those videos (even you did not watch them) then no need to see and no need to contact me about them. Simply disregard them. I am not begging you to watch them, rest assured.
1399:
I will try to explain in more detail. Autoblock occur when the IP of a person who is blocked logs into another account. The information is kept from everyone, including admins, because people are allowed to have multiple accounts to ensure privacy if done withing the
467:
that's all. At this point, there seems to be a consensus to overlook it. So don't worry about it. I'm more concerned with the overall approach you’ve taken to talk pages and your fellow editors. If you can address that, you'll not be blocked to begin with. Sound good?
1657:
as to how we should resolve the dispute. Please leave a comment regarding this on my talk page. If you like this template please don't put it up yourself. I am looking for some sort of concensus. If you don't like the template please leave a suggestion for improving
1848:). Navigation between pages is sketchy-at-best now, and your input before I release it to the general community would be appreciated. Message me back with your answer; I think your knowledge of Islam would help in deciding the most relevant links. Thanks, --
780:"What a horrible and systemtic wretched work of Arrow740 and company. That is the same reason I had been emphasizing that such sick editors..." were a completely inappropriate personal attack. Making these kind of attacks is unacceptable. Please read
357:
I'll try ALM. However, it is hard to AGF when some of those whom I argue with do not do the same with me. Don't get me wrong, I love the debates, and respect all of the users there, but I have a short fuse for personal attacks and baseless diatribes.
897:
I want to ask respected Mr. HighInBC, If the bad intention of a person is visible as daylight, even then we cant call him bad? what kind of incivility is that? I would rather call the Judge to be incivil if he does not let me declare the criminal as
1834:
Come on. If fifty editors interpret a policy/guideline differently than five, chances are that the fifty are correct in their interpretation. I just ask, why do you keep arguing? You're not changing anybody's opinion by shouting and posting YouTube
526:
and give immpresion for a reader that he was wrong, it is not the job of a editor or Knowledge (XXG) to judge either a person was wrong or right. Please let the artical free of POVs, and other informaiton was present in many related links artical.
320:
who write good English at Muhammad page and defend not to have pictures. Hence please think more widely and do not start saying each other socket puppit for nothing. Even wikipedia allow to have multiple account in case they are not use to violate
1976:...Which constitutes another personal attack. Have you ever considered rephrasing your arguments on talk pages? Your hostility turns the community against you, and it would be a lot easier to edit if you rephrased a little to be less indignant. --
756:
use sockpuppets to stack polls; you only discredit yourself and your cause. If Jesus Fan will only remove his "vote," all is fine, but if you continue this disruption, I will pursue this further. Do not create further sockpuppets, for they shall
560:
Your POV was when you claim about he was wrong and he made false statements etc. You missed the point completely here, we are not here to judge somebody either you like them or not..Our job as a editor to keep artical as neutral as possible.
1954:
What rules? Am I editing some scholastic article? It was a general conversion on your talk page. Was I discussing some wikipedia article? And as I said, just dont use your tiny brain on my refereces if you are not interested. Save energy.
1930:
Explain to me how those are "off-topic". They pertain directly to the conversations, and the medium through which the conversations are carried. If you can't abide by the rules, you won't be taken seriously. You should know that by now.
1466:
The autoblock on VirtualEye has expired with your block. You are being effected by another block that has not expired. I even did an unblock on the VirtualEye autoblock, with no result. You are looking for something like this:
893:
It's very sorrowful that people are being banned on the allegations of being 'incivil' but nobody cares about the 'civil' cunning and systematic campaigns to spread hatered filth in Islam related articles just in the name of
2196:
There is not third way. Again, I did not come to you to discuss wikipedia articles or about the rules. So please keep sleeping in the nights and do not bother if you wanted to apply wikipedia rules about videos discussion.
2691:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
2404:
If that was insult then what is the point to quote all of it again on my page? A link was enough or few words. Removing the statement from ALM's page has same reason for which I removed from my page.
1672:
Calligraphic images will compete with "humanoid" ones on equal footing. At the end of the competition, the image was which the most scholarly support is found will win. There is no default winner.
1814:
How do I guarantee my edit in an article when there are uncountable people at opposite POV ready revert anytime? If I add some %#$ related to their POV then the will not revert, I guarantee. 0_0
2620:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also
281:
contributions were to the page. It may be a coincidence that the account became active the same day that VirtualEye was banned. I don't know whose sock puppet it is, but it is most definitely
1286:
Regardless of that, I still need the information I described above to undo the autoblock. This information is kept from me to protect your privacy, but I cannot undo the block without it.
1543:. From the language of your edit (n-named painting by a creator who's name is not known), I was assuming that you were not yet aware of this. At least the image has a name behind it. --
1765:
I know that the war is unjust, but I definitely will support my troops. They are young, scared kids, and will follow orders given to them. If you want to talk, come to my talk page. --
2631:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
1844:
as we try to understand each other. I also would like your help in standardizing templates on Islam related pages (you can find my current proposal, still in the infantile stages, at
1758:
cease-fire. Flying airplanes into buildings full of innocent civilians, unprovoked. If the militants in Fallujah aren't going to follow the internationally accepted laws of war (the
2445:
VirtualEye, I am not interested in your excuses. The attack IS personal and obscene, and not allowed according to Wiki policy. That is all I care about. You need to remove it ASAP.
2552:
1716:
Thus Jyallands posten cartoons were only popular for about a few months, not throughout the better part of the 1,400 years of history of Islam. Also, they do no represent the way
2240:
efficient in picking my words but you dont understand a single point I had been saying. Still did not understand? JUST DISREGARD THE NON RELEVANT VIDEO REFERENCES AND EXCUSE ME.
2080:
Second, if these videos you refer to are "not biased" in your opinion, then CNN and SkyNews are "not biased" in my opinion. In thise case, CNN and SkyNews win, because of their
678:
Ah, IC so Hojimachong is again moaning. And you are accusing me of sock puppetary, nice, how nice, Ok man keep this weeping and threatening. I must leave this sick place soon.
2632:
1779:
I'm sorry, but if you come and criticize CNN and SkyNews, and then come and post YouTube videos for me to watch, do you think for one minute I am going to take them seriously?
1680:
That will be in the section called "criticism". If you can find a reliable secondary source that criticize the image or a concept in the image, then you can argue against it.
1811:
when there are 10001 Christians, Zionists, Jews, Hindus and Atheists at one side of POV about a topic and half a dozen muslim wikipedians defending their POV on other side?
1791:
for Knowledge (XXG), but you choose to continuously censor, propogandize, and deneutralize good articles. I ask you; Why? Why are you at Knowledge (XXG), VirtualEye? --
2555:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
1039:
Proabivouac! I think you have seen some horrible nightmare last week. Any wikipedian who disagrees to the POV of you and your army, he is considered a sockpuppet of me?
977:
without realizing that such misconduct discredits, not furthers, your cause. If you wish to stay and contribute, you're welcome to do so, but you must follow the rules.
2192:
So discussion can only be related to wikipedia articles. For the moment I dont have any wikipedia content to discuss with you. Those videos do NOT belong to wikipedia.
2370:
said "Please remove this ASAP", I don't think it was meant that you should remove this message, but rather the insulting and crude message you left on ALM's page.
2243:
The problem in wikipedia is that I cant call a person stupid even if he is one of the dumbest persons I ever met. And this is just because I am judged as incivil.
2425:
839:
of the options you think would be acceptable. You can sign all or none of these, I'm hoping this will give us a more-fine grained understanding of the issue.
1119:
You removed the text from this page, and put a thing in the top right corner about there being an archive, but you accidentally forgot to create an archive.
423:
I didn't say you did not AGF. I have a great deal of respect for you, ALM, and have been able to carry on a respectful dialogue with you. As for VirtualEye:
2105:
Third, regardless of the personal attacks you continue to throw at me ("you are respectful decent polite genius schoolkid" in a sarcastic tone), I have
1845:
1731:
articles such sa child pornography, it is obviously censored by law. Child porn is illegal but showing pictures of muhammad (pbuh) isn't. Salam. (
1443:
Hmmm, if it was that original autoblock, then I can hit that one. Would have thought it would have expired long before now by itself. Try now.
1342:
The information in the autoblock template should indicate which login caused the autoblock. Simply posting this information will let me do it.
1042:
You will keep thinking like this till every wikipedian dies who has opposite POV to you. Do you really think that nobody can disagree with you?
252:
are good for a Muslim (according to my knowledge of Islam) 1) forgivness and 2) assuming good faith always (unless 101% sure otherwise). ----
1157:
1386:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "VirtualEye". The reason given for VirtualEye's block is: "personal attacks again:
2716:
2494:
Are you sure the modern Bible's have the word trinity? I haven't been able to find any. So, if you don't mind I have reverted your edit. --
1750:
at troops. It doesn't really matter how old the kid behind that rifle is; He is shooting at you, and you have no choice but to shoot back.
1708:
the opinion of art scholars/historians (of any religious background) on how the mainstream depict Muhammad, whenever Muhammad is depicted
2408:
disinformation about me on every other user's page and trashing every opposite opinion of different users by calling them 'VirtualEye'.
784:
again and treat this as a final warning: next time you indulge in these kind of comments you will get blocked for a cool-off period. --
214:
admins to ban me but also tried to eliminated other wikipedian who was opposing the pictures. Hence targetting two aims with one arrow.
2595:
1573:
2574:
I thought you might be interested in this template since you expressed support for boycotting Knowledge (XXG) on my sub-userpage. --
705:
641:
507:
451:
366:
293:
1676:
Is the poroposed compatible the physical description of Muhammad which has higher notability and credibility than the image srouce?
1624:: Organization having the POV to extremely oppose all the religions so that it can be NPOV for all religions but a POV of Atheists.
194:
taken wrongly. If someone will ban you wrongly then I will fight for it and I like to fight anything that I feel wrong around. ---
2712:
39:
2009:? You can put whatever long-winded answer you want here, but respond on my talk page with either "Yes ~~~~" or "No ~~~~". --
1404:
policy. The template in the block log can be posted here and the autoblock can be investigated. Otherwise it will just stay.
728:. The grammar is also just that little bit odd to match enough. Anyone else know who uses that 'a)' edit summary other than
580:
You voiced your opinion in the original straw poll which has caused some confusion. Please do the same in a new version,
2613:
2588:
2584:
1355:
As he says, there is nothing to unblock. To undo an autoblock, you will need to use the appropriate information. We do
2703:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2708:
2518:
1168:'s breakup recieved much more coverage than Iraq's general election. Anyways, I thought you might enjoy this book. --
724:
in which the letter 'a' appears on it's own i.e. it looks like 'a)' also seems to happen a lot on edit summaries of
277:
sock puppet. He came with a long diatribe, used weak allegations to attack me and not critique the article, and his
2163:
I would like to discuss the issues further, if you don't mind. I'm not going to walk away from this that easily. --
2428:. It's getting old, and needs to be decided once and for all. I won't comment on the rest of your comment, ATM. --
973:), vote-stack, upload ridiculous images and troll? You're not the first user who joined Knowledge (XXG) to make a
128:
could emulate a new-user but the grammar really would be hard to learn in a day. There is no sock activity here.
1762:), then they certainly aren't going to recieve much thought over how the U.S. Military is going to defeat them.
48:
1130:
I intentionally forgot to create archive :). Because I was blocked to create any page. Thanks for your effort.
752:
Please stop this useless game. I don't want to see you blocked or banned; I want to see the misconduct stop.
693:. If you are indeed not him, then there should be no problem denying it. I was giving you a chance to let us
1273:
Other account? The computer I use is not my personal property. So I cant stop people using Knowledge (XXG).
581:
574:
2621:
2517:
I know I may be beating a dead horse here, but in case you haven't already been pointed in this direction,
1698:
Under the criteria I have set up, Jyllands cartoons will not win the competition for the following reasons.
835:
Please sign if any of these things applies to your understanding of this issue. Please put you name under
2704:
1066:
846:
poll with still be there tomorrow. It is not my intention to silence you in this debate with this block.
2535:
2434:
2324:
2219:
2169:
2119:
2067:
on Knowledge (XXG). You can't edit here if you aren't going to follow the rules, that is pretty obvious.
2015:
1982:
1937:
1883:
1854:
1797:
1771:
1654:
1549:
1470:
1240:
1174:
1102:
703:
639:
505:
449:
364:
291:
124:
makes all the mistakes of a new user i.e. forgets to sign, re-edits text sections. One could argue that
2656:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --
2292:
1218:
Autoblocks occur when you log in as another account when you are blocked. I will see if I can find it.
2041:
I am rude, angry and stupid person and you are respectful decent polite genius schoolkid... Happy now?
1568:
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Knowledge (XXG) articles, as you did to
2661:
2548:
588:
2680:
2671:
1668:
If there is no reliable humanoid image avaialbe then only one or two calligraphic images are enough.
1577:
1096:
it for you? This speeds up load times on slower computers, and makes the page easier to navigate. --
1093:
1045:
Keep bringing such usernames and I keep on adding them to my friends list. Thanks for your efforts.
1576:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the
1426:
This problem arised last time also, and Mr. Tom Harrison solved it without asking me a single bit.
1149:, but interesting nonetheless; I found a book I believe may interest you, VirtualEye. It is titled
2700:
2684:
2315:
1759:
1618:: Organization having the POV to extremely support Chritianity and oppose nonChristian religions.
652:
612:
I am Sick of the allegations and attack of incivility. I think I should withdraw from wikipedia.
402:
329:
253:
195:
121:
113:
72:
54:
2495:
1511:
Good. I just came back to make sure the block had come off. This problem happens quite often. --
2092:
be as notable or verifiable as an international corporation, whose only job is to report facts.
2617:
2599:
2575:
2560:
1581:
1154:
217:
Are those users (i.e. Hojimachong and Proabivuac) warned by anyone due to their sick attempt?
2696:
2688:
2461:, I failed to check, I have replaced the example with a link. Sorry for my misunderstanding.
1647:
1557:
1401:
481:
76:
2642:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
2530:
2429:
2319:
2301:
2267:
2214:
2164:
2114:
2010:
1977:
1932:
1878:
1849:
1792:
1766:
1544:
1319:
1169:
1097:
978:
762:
698:
664:
634:
602:
500:
468:
444:
359:
325:
286:
80:
50:
21:
2699:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2692:
2653:
2643:
2636:
2625:
1841:
1711:
the way Islamic tradition has portrayed Muhammad during the 1,400 years of History of Islam
781:
777:
694:
656:
630:
321:
244:
236:
2657:
2504:
2415:
2251:
2197:
2147:
2047:
1956:
1914:
1865:
1819:
1721:
1689:
1659:
1628:
1515:
1495:
1427:
1303:
1274:
1206:
1187:
1161:
1131:
1110:
1046:
1018:
961:
788:
743:
729:
725:
679:
613:
585:
546:
218:
125:
117:
103:
2356:
on ALM's user page. This is both obscene and a personal attack. Please remove this ASAP.
1643:
629:
is a sockpuppet/meatpuppet of yours? You've never denied it, and if you do, then we will
2475:
2446:
2392:
2367:
2357:
2311:
1451:
1367:
718:
690:
660:
626:
598:
138:
2612:
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for
2081:
436:
According to Checkmeout101's logs, the account was created at 23:03, Feb. 17th, 2007 (
241:
Islam's principle is that everyone is innocient/good-person unless confirmed otherwise
181:
Please keep the hope and I think no one will ban you for socket puppit thing. I think
2646:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
2462:
2371:
2336:
1476:
1410:
1343:
1326:
1287:
1252:
1219:
1146:
995:
847:
814:
813:
If you continue being uncivil you may find your blocks getting longer in the future.
801:
742:
That tells I am either being fooled by you people or that person called "Jesus Fan".
562:
527:
182:
153:
2556:
969:
I guess to be incivil, make personal attacks, get blocked, create sockpuppets (now
733:
485:
129:
1359:
have the information necessary to undo this without your cooperation. I'm sorry.
881:
is describing the teachings and life of Muhammad, and again, All people know that.
2288:
1732:
1684:
Is the image more notable than the cartoon images of Jylland Posten and Bahomet?
1165:
1120:
970:
2605:
1539:, I was merely pointing out to you that the image has since been attributed to
152:
I am not so sure, however, in absence of evidence we should assume good faith.
2146:
OK, Those videos do not belong to wikipedia. Game Over. Thanks for your time.
1512:
785:
102:
Now at this matter I dont have any hope of Justice from the wikipedia admins.
93:
Now where are those Admins who have microscope to identify my each incivility?
797:
I think this user has had plenty of final warnings for personal attacks. This
179:
Now at this matter I dont have any hope of Justice from the wikipedia admins.
1599:
1569:
1540:
1529:
1444:
1360:
1071:
2189:
the "broom" of Knowledge (XXG) rules applies everywhere on Knowledge (XXG).
1409:
Basically it is to avoid people running multiple accounts to avoid blocks.
52:
1594:
1388:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge (XXG):Administrators%27_n
663:
is as obvious a sockpuppet as I've ever seen (and I've seen quite a few).
2720:
2665:
2578:
2564:
2537:
2507:
2498:
2478:
2469:
2449:
2436:
2418:
2395:
2378:
2360:
2339:
2326:
2304:
2270:
2254:
2221:
2200:
2171:
2150:
2121:
2050:
2017:
1984:
1959:
1939:
1917:
1885:
1868:
1856:
1822:
1799:
1773:
1735:
1724:
1692:
1662:
1631:
1603:
1584:
1564:
1551:
1518:
1498:
1483:
1453:
1430:
1417:
1369:
1350:
1333:
1306:
1294:
1277:
1259:
1226:
1209:
1190:
1176:
1134:
1123:
1113:
1104:
1075:
1049:
1021:
1002:
981:
964:
927:
That a factual picture can not be removed even if some people dont like.
854:
821:
808:
791:
765:
746:
736:
710:
682:
667:
646:
616:
605:
591:
565:
549:
530:
512:
488:
471:
456:
405:
371:
332:
298:
256:
221:
198:
160:
147:
132:
106:
83:
2687:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1494:
I think its working now. Gracious. Danke. Merci beaucoup. Both of you.
2424:
Following policy, I'll notify you that I have opened up a SUSPSOCK at
800:
is not appropriate no matter who you are referring to. 24 hour block.
1205:
I am still blocked. I wonder why am I being oppressed by autoblocks.
2007:
Are you suggesting that the videos you referred me to are not biased
960:
Anyway, I have no hope again, but still I am here, I dont know why.
1597:
friend showed me this, I thought you might get a laugh out of it --
1186:
injustice brings outrage. I hope you are also enlightened someday.
2088:
made a video; if it was on YouTube or Google video, it would not
584:, which should be clear and allow us to better assess consensus.
1877:
isn't a good word to be using when you address other editors. --
1785:
information can be found in a Google search, rom many websites).
430:
VirtualEye was blocked at 10:15, Feb. 17th, 2007, 24 hr. block (
2005:
Wait; Put CNN, SkyNews, and everthing else aside for a minute.
2113:. Because it's pretty obvious that you aren't any of those. --
55:
15:
518:
Reverting back you latest addition on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad page
401:
have to work now and cannot spend anymore time here. bye ---
99:
of a person throwing false accusations on others so easily.
2604:
484:
might be justified to settle the matter once and for all. -
994:
I have passed along your support to the two you supported.
906:
The opposite factual content even if some people dont like,
1702:
The criteria is that the image must be representative of:
1251:" section. I need this information to undo the autoblock.
1092:
Your talk page is getting quite long. Would you mind if I
689:
Actually, I was giving you a chance to deny that you are
1237:
When you try to edit, you get a block message, copy the
243:. I have made many people blocked multiple times due to
2633:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Islamic terrorism
2459:
2353:
1875:
1536:
1387:
1151:
Censored 2007: The Top 25 Censored News Stories of 2007
840:
798:
722:
496:
437:
431:
328:
I urge you to assume good faith if you can please. ---
916:
The baseless filthy content by some ill-willed person.
120:
quite simply because the grammar is way different and
2547:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
2139:
First, the "broom" of Knowledge (XXG) rules applies
2063:
First, the "broom" of Knowledge (XXG) rules applies
1753:
the remarks about the chemical weapons are the most
1746:
Let's talk about this video for a moment, shall we?
582:Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29
575:Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29
2679:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
2474:No need to apologize, no fault of yours. Thanks,
2426:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/VirtualEye
2335:The fourth line of your algorithm is very funny.
1383:Recursive block. Here is the reason of autoblock:
1315:If you don't want me to handle this then use the
655:was his sockpuppet, either. I will certainly not
1650:, to solve the dispute over images of Muhammad.
1642:I have a suggestion, based on wiki policies of
1612:Thanks for the info. Now I can better compare:
1109:Thanks, but no thanks, I have done it. 8-: -->
2553:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion
2266:Yes, that would indeed qualify as incivility.
8:
2310:And 60.52.18.34, 60.52.46.24, 60.52.87.230,
247:violations and also one person was blocked
1145:Completely unrelated to the discussion at
1846:User:Hojimachong/Islam-Related Templates
2652:This is an automatic notification by a
1595:http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
1572:. Doing so violates Knowledge (XXG)'s
934:No censorship' policy does not jutify:
697:. I would love to be able to do so. --
659:on this issue; he's been warned, and
7:
2543:Image:Maome2.jpg listed for deletion
1688:I am not sure what you mean by that.
947:'actually clashing with the article'
2109:called you rude, angry, or stupid.
872:Only one image, not at the top =YES
633:unless further evidence pops up. --
541:Please talk to me before reverting.
462:VirtualEye, you wouldn't have been
2589:User:LatinoMuslim/WikipediaBoycott
2585:User:LatinoMuslim/WikipediaBoycott
2525:that Answering-Christianty.com is
2084:. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't care if
1638:The Prophet Muhammad image dispute
1245:code generated for you under the "
884:(I hope my above comment is civil)
14:
2705:review the candidates' statements
2521:is the MOS:ISLAM guideline which
2570:Knowledge (XXG) Boycott Campaign
1563:
950:'clashing with the factual data'
923:No censorship' policy justifies:
497:care to explain this incivility?
20:
1840:I want to invite you to have a
2711:. For the Election committee,
2681:Arbitration Committee election
2672:ArbCom elections are now open!
2213:Then what did you come for? --
1842:nice cup of tea and a sit down
717:Funny how the edit summary of
1:
2721:13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1725:22:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
1693:17:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
1663:03:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
1632:08:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
1604:02:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
1585:15:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
1552:23:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1519:11:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1499:02:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1484:02:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1454:02:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1431:02:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1418:02:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1370:02:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1351:02:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1334:02:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1307:02:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1295:02:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1278:02:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1260:02:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1227:02:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1210:02:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1191:00:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1177:23:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1135:01:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1124:00:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1114:16:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1105:05:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1076:15:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1050:15:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1022:16:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1003:14:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
982:07:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
965:04:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
944:'without creator/author name'
855:23:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
822:19:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
809:19:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
792:19:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
766:09:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
747:08:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
737:08:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
711:06:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
683:06:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
668:06:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
647:06:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
617:06:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
606:06:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
592:22:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
566:12:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
550:14:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
531:11:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
513:06:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
489:02:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
472:19:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
457:17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
406:17:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
372:17:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
333:17:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
299:17:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
257:16:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
222:15:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
199:14:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
161:13:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
148:13:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
133:12:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
107:11:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
84:08:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
2579:15:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
1574:neutral point of view policy
625:Would you like to deny that
273:Checkmeout101 was obviously
2707:and submit your choices on
2626:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
2616:. The nominated article is
2348:Obscene and Personal Attack
2736:
2713:MediaWiki message delivery
2666:01:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
2622:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
2591:
2513:Answering-Christianity.com
2508:12:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
2499:08:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
2340:06:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
831:Poll on every little issue
2639:with four tildes (~~~~).
2538:20:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
2529:an appropriate source. --
2479:02:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2470:02:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2450:02:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2437:02:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2419:02:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2396:02:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2379:02:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2361:23:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2327:06:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2305:06:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2271:06:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2255:02:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2222:19:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2201:18:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2172:18:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2151:14:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2122:08:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2051:08:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2018:23:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1985:17:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1960:09:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1940:08:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1918:05:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1906:I should take tea and sit
1886:05:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1869:05:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
1857:22:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
1823:16:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
1800:15:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
1774:18:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
1736:03:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
651:No one quite denied that
443:Just food for thought. --
2565:18:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1755:hypocritical statements'
239:say so but only because
426:According to the logs:
79:to evade your block(s).
2609:
1653:I have put a template
912:NPOV does not justify:
761:be identified as such.
2685:Arbitration Committee
2644:articles for deletion
2608:
2551:, has been listed at
2283:Sockpuppets, trolling
2044:Arrogance never pays.
869:Strong no images =YES
2635:. Please be sure to
1742:Regarding your video
1590:You might enjoy this
1069:, the both of you --
975:very important point
324:or to avoid blocks.
2689:arbitration process
2523:specifically states
2143:on Knowledge (XXG).
2701:arbitration policy
2637:sign your comments
2610:
2316:User:Checkmeout101
1760:Geneva Conventions
1720:portrays Muhammad.
653:User:Checkmeout101
122:User:Checkmeout101
114:User:Checkmeout101
73:User:Checkmeout101
2618:Islamic terrorism
2600:Islamic terrorism
2491:Hi Virtual Eye,
2468:
2464:
2377:
2373:
2293:User:60.52.92.234
1718:Islamic tradition
1602:
1482:
1478:
1416:
1412:
1395:(edit conflict)
1349:
1345:
1332:
1328:
1293:
1289:
1258:
1254:
1225:
1221:
1158:978-1-58322-738-1
1074:
1001:
997:
853:
849:
820:
816:
807:
803:
776:Your comments at
695:assume good faith
631:assume good faith
159:
155:
145:
61:
60:
2727:
2563:
2549:Image:Maome2.jpg
2467:
2463:
2458:He did remove it
2376:
2372:
1598:
1567:
1481:
1477:
1449:
1415:
1411:
1365:
1348:
1344:
1331:
1327:
1324:
1318:
1292:
1288:
1257:
1253:
1224:
1220:
1070:
1000:
996:
852:
848:
819:
815:
806:
802:
326:User:Hojimachong
158:
154:
143:
139:
56:
24:
16:
2735:
2734:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2709:the voting page
2675:
2603:
2572:
2559:
2545:
2515:
2489:
2350:
2287:VirtualEye, re
2285:
1744:
1640:
1622:Knowledge (XXG)
1592:
1561:
1533:
1445:
1361:
1322:
1316:
1202:
1162:Jessica Simpson
1143:
1090:
902:NPOV justifies:
833:
774:
708:
644:
597:Vote once, not
578:
520:
510:
454:
369:
296:
285:sock puppet. --
235:wikipedia rule
141:
96:
69:
57:
51:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2733:
2731:
2678:
2674:
2669:
2602:
2598:nomination of
2593:
2571:
2568:
2544:
2541:
2514:
2511:
2488:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2440:
2439:
2403:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2382:
2381:
2368:User:Nayan Nev
2349:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2330:
2329:
2312:User:Jesus Fan
2284:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2241:
2231:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2193:
2190:
2181:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2144:
2131:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2031:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1901:
1891:
1889:
1888:
1862:
1860:
1859:
1837:
1836:
1831:
1830:
1807:Muslim wacko.
1805:
1803:
1802:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1743:
1740:
1728:
1727:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1709:
1700:
1699:
1639:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1627:Thanks again.
1625:
1619:
1613:
1608:
1591:
1588:
1560:
1555:
1532:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1474:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1421:
1420:
1406:
1405:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1384:
1377:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1310:
1309:
1298:
1297:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1244:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1213:
1212:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1181:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1127:
1126:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1043:
1040:
1031:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
987:
986:
985:
984:
957:
956:
953:
952:
951:
948:
945:
942:
939:
938:the 'baseless'
930:
929:
928:
919:
918:
917:
909:
908:
907:
899:
895:
888:
886:
885:
882:
878:
873:
870:
867:
860:
858:
857:
832:
829:
827:
825:
824:
811:
773:
770:
769:
768:
740:
739:
719:User:Jesus Fan
714:
713:
706:
686:
685:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
661:User:Jesus Fan
642:
620:
619:
609:
608:
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
555:
554:
553:
552:
542:
536:
535:
534:
533:
519:
516:
508:
494:
493:
492:
491:
475:
474:
452:
441:
440:
434:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
367:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
294:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
227:
226:
225:
224:
215:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
112:I don't think
95:
90:
88:
68:
65:
63:
59:
58:
53:
49:
47:
44:
43:
35:
34:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2732:
2723:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2645:
2640:
2638:
2634:
2629:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2607:
2601:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2590:
2586:
2581:
2580:
2577:
2569:
2567:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2542:
2540:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2533:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2512:
2510:
2509:
2506:
2501:
2500:
2497:
2492:
2486:
2480:
2477:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2466:
2460:
2457:
2456:
2451:
2448:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2438:
2435:
2433:
2432:
2427:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2397:
2394:
2390:
2387:Quite right,
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2380:
2375:
2369:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2355:
2347:
2341:
2338:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2322:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2294:
2290:
2282:
2272:
2269:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2253:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2217:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2202:
2199:
2194:
2191:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2167:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2152:
2149:
2145:
2142:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2117:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2082:verifiability
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2066:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2019:
2016:
2014:
2013:
2008:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1961:
1958:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1935:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1898:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1881:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1867:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1852:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:
1833:
1832:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1821:
1815:
1812:
1808:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1795:
1789:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1769:
1763:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1747:
1741:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1670:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1616:Conservapedia
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1589:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1566:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1538:
1531:
1528:
1520:
1517:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1497:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1472:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1432:
1429:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1414:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1364:
1358:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1347:
1341:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1321:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1300:
1299:
1296:
1291:
1285:
1284:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1261:
1256:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1238:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1197:
1192:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:Talk:Muhammad
1140:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1087:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1004:
999:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
983:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
963:
959:
958:
954:
949:
946:
943:
940:
937:
936:
935:
931:
926:
925:
924:
920:
915:
914:
913:
910:
905:
904:
903:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
883:
879:
877:
874:
871:
868:
866:
863:
862:
861:
856:
851:
844:
843:
842:
841:
838:
830:
828:
823:
818:
812:
810:
805:
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
790:
787:
783:
779:
772:Final Warning
771:
767:
764:
760:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
745:
738:
735:
731:
727:
723:
720:
716:
715:
712:
709:
704:
702:
701:
696:
692:
688:
687:
684:
681:
677:
676:
669:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
649:
648:
645:
640:
638:
637:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
618:
615:
611:
610:
607:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
587:
583:
576:
573:
567:
564:
559:
558:
557:
556:
551:
548:
543:
540:
539:
538:
537:
532:
529:
524:
523:
522:
521:
517:
515:
514:
511:
506:
504:
503:
498:
490:
487:
483:
480:Looks like a
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
470:
465:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
450:
448:
447:
438:
435:
432:
429:
428:
427:
424:
407:
404:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
373:
370:
365:
363:
362:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
334:
331:
327:
323:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
300:
297:
292:
290:
289:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
258:
255:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
223:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
200:
197:
193:
188:
184:
183:User:HighInBC
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
162:
157:
151:
150:
149:
146:
144:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
119:
116:is a sock of
115:
111:
110:
109:
108:
105:
100:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
82:
78:
75:: do not use
74:
66:
64:
46:
45:
42:
41:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
2676:
2650:Please note:
2649:
2648:
2641:
2630:
2611:
2582:
2576:LatinoMuslim
2573:
2546:
2531:
2526:
2522:
2516:
2503:Ok, thanks.
2502:
2493:
2490:
2430:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2388:
2351:
2320:
2298:please stop.
2297:
2296:
2286:
2250:
2230:
2215:
2180:
2165:
2140:
2130:
2115:
2110:
2106:
2089:
2085:
2064:
2030:
2011:
2006:
1978:
1933:
1909:bla bla.....
1900:I am incivil
1890:
1879:
1861:
1850:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1804:
1793:
1767:
1764:
1754:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1729:
1717:
1701:
1687:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1652:
1641:
1621:
1615:
1607:
1593:
1582:Orangemarlin
1580:. Thank you.
1562:
1545:
1534:
1471:unblock-auto
1446:
1394:
1376:
1362:
1356:
1266:
1248:Autoblocked?
1247:
1246:
1241:unblock-auto
1195:
1180:
1170:
1150:
1144:
1108:
1098:
1091:
1067:WP:NOFEEDING
1030:
974:
933:
922:
911:
901:
887:
875:
864:
859:
836:
834:
826:
775:
758:
753:
741:
699:
635:
579:
501:
495:
463:
445:
442:
425:
422:
360:
287:
282:
278:
274:
248:
240:
191:
186:
178:
140:
101:
97:
92:
87:
70:
67:Sockpuppetry
62:
38:
26:
2532:Hojimachong
2431:Hojimachong
2321:Hojimachong
2302:Proabivouac
2289:User:Towaru
2268:Proabivouac
2216:Hojimachong
2166:Hojimachong
2116:Hojimachong
2086:God himself
2012:Hojimachong
1979:Hojimachong
1934:Hojimachong
1903:I am biased
1880:Hojimachong
1874:"Dumbshit"
1851:Hojimachong
1794:Hojimachong
1768:Hojimachong
1546:Hojimachong
1200:InBC there?
1171:Hojimachong
1166:Nick Lachey
1099:Hojimachong
1017:Thanks BC.
979:Proabivouac
971:User:Towaru
941:'unsourced'
876:My Comment:
763:Proabivouac
700:Hojimachong
665:Proabivouac
636:Hojimachong
603:Proabivouac
502:Hojimachong
469:Proabivouac
446:Hojimachong
361:Hojimachong
288:Hojimachong
249:indefinitly
81:Proabivouac
77:sockpuppets
2697:topic bans
2658:Erwin85Bot
2505:VirtualEye
2416:VirtualEye
2352:You wrote
2252:VirtualEye
2198:VirtualEye
2148:VirtualEye
2141:everywhere
2065:everywhere
2048:VirtualEye
1957:VirtualEye
1915:VirtualEye
1866:VirtualEye
1820:VirtualEye
1722:Bless sins
1690:Bless sins
1660:Bless sins
1629:VirtualEye
1535:regarding
1496:VirtualEye
1428:VirtualEye
1325:template.
1304:VirtualEye
1275:VirtualEye
1207:VirtualEye
1188:VirtualEye
1132:VirtualEye
1111:VirtualEye
1047:VirtualEye
1019:VirtualEye
962:VirtualEye
744:VirtualEye
730:VirtualEye
726:VirtualEye
680:VirtualEye
614:VirtualEye
547:VirtualEye
219:VirtualEye
137:i concur.
126:VirtualEye
118:VirtualEye
104:VirtualEye
40:/Archive 1
2693:site bans
1829:userpage.
1570:Evolution
1541:Al-Biruni
1530:Al-Biruni
1088:Archiving
865:My votes:
759:assuredly
691:Jesus Fan
627:Jesus Fan
187:very fair
142:ITAQALLAH
2614:deletion
2391:thanks!
2389:HighInBC
2337:Arrow740
1094:archived
563:phippi46
528:phippi46
192:might be
27:Archives
2557:Sherool
2487:Trinity
1835:videos.
1648:WP:NPOV
1578:sandbox
1558:WP:NPOV
1402:WP:SOCK
1320:unblock
1164:'s and
955:images.
734:Ttiotsw
486:Merzbow
482:WP:RFCU
177:Reply:
130:Ttiotsw
2683:. The
2561:(talk)
1733:Ssd175
1473:|...}}
1243:|...}}
1121:Andjam
898:'bad'.
782:WP:NPA
778:WP:ANI
754:Do not
657:WP:AGF
464:banned
322:WP:3RR
245:WP:3RR
237:WP:AGF
2624:and "
2496:Aminz
2366:When
2188:: -->
2187:: -->
2138:: -->
2137:: -->
2107:never
1644:WP:RS
1513:BozMo
894:NPOV.
889:P.S.
786:BozMo
721:here
599:twice
2717:talk
2662:talk
2628:").
2519:here
2465:InBC
2374:InBC
2354:this
2318:. --
2111:Ever
2090:ever
1655:here
1537:this
1516:talk
1479:InBC
1447:Kuru
1413:InBC
1363:Kuru
1346:InBC
1329:InBC
1290:InBC
1255:InBC
1222:InBC
1155:ISBN
1141:Book
998:InBC
850:InBC
817:InBC
804:InBC
789:talk
586:gren
279:only
156:InBC
2677:Hi,
2654:bot
2596:AfD
2587:}}
2527:not
2295:...
1658:it.
1600:feb
1357:not
1072:feb
837:all
707:con
643:con
589:グレン
509:con
453:con
403:ALM
368:con
330:ALM
295:con
254:ALM
196:ALM
185:is
71:Re
2719:)
2695:,
2664:)
2583:{{
2476:NN
2447:NN
2393:NN
2358:NN
2314:,
2291:,
1931:--
1738:)
1646:,
1475:.
1469:{{
1323:}}
1317:{{
1239:{{
732:?
499:--
358:--
2715:(
2660:(
1153:(
932:'
921:'
601:.
439:)
433:)
283:a
275:a
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
