User talk:Wasted Time R/Archive 12

2072:

self-identified religious affiliation of each justice is generally not considered religious interpretation, nor was it intended to be that (NOR). The majority opinion in the mainstream press has made it a topic of dialogue that SCOTUS has a six-person Roman Catholic majority for the first time in its history. It seemed important to indicate somewhere on the page that although Sotomayor self-identifies herself as Roman Catholic (Infobox) that she is nonetheless a part of the liberal bloc of the Court and not with the other five. The alternate wording indicating this I can try to post later today for everyone to review. In terms of other further edits, that is about all of it for the 3 recent books on the Roberts Court enhancing the Sotomayor page. Its now 10% more informative, with the missing section on Notable rulings on SCOTUS now posted and in presentable shape following your edits. If it looks remotely close to nomination for FAC then perhaps you could consider co-nominating since two are needed for this. She would be the first woman on the Supreme Court at top peer review status. (Also, I am not the author you refer to of

1640:

to indicate when the information was current as of. News sources, on the other hand, such as the New York Times or Washington Post or CNN or BBC News, always have publication dates associated with them. Accessdates aren't required for these, nor are they forbidden - it's sort of left to the discretion of the primary authors of an article. My view is that they are visually cluttering (two dates to parse instead of one) without adding any value to readers, while also driving up article load time. Some editors say they help in resolving deadlinks, but I've rarely found them of benefit in doing that. So I've gotten articles to FA and GA status with this minimal use of them. Other editors have different perspectives on this and still use accessdates heavily. If there's one thing you can say about Knowledge (XXG) citing styles, it's that there's no universal approach that everyone uses ...

2031:

like to join in the upgrade effort. Please feel free to re-post this edit on the Talk page at Sotomayor if you think it helpful to invite others to this upgrade process. Regarding your two items for your two edits, you first brought up the "next twenty years or more issue" in the Lead section. This material was actually sourced to the book by Marcia Coyle from last year with the cite pages I included as a footnote for verification. Second item was the parenthetical comment on "first Latin justice" which has been debated in the press. My deference has been to the major Latin organizations which have asked those interested to discount the Cardozo reports as anecdotal, largely because Cardozo did not seem to either make or support the claim himself.

3584:

out in practice. For non-competition work, FA and GA don't have automated user talk page credits, but DYK does. My practice for DYK nominations I'm doing is to add on any other registered users who made significant content additions, even if it's just one edit. For just noting on your own user page what you've done, that's up to you. On my user page I note separately those I've been leader editor of, #2 editor of, or made some significant contribution towards. I guess I could also name some that I shaped the contents of significantly via comments during FAC. You can put whatever you want really.

2035:

incorporate the parenthetical text of 'first Latin justice" into the narrative of the section along with sourcing the identification of the Cardozo comment as anecdotal by major Latin organizations. This would enhance the narrative quality of the section as well. If you have any interest in participating in the upgrade process, or know of anyone else who could join the enhancement process, then let me know and I can share the sources and publishers that I am relying upon for the upgrade preparation. Cheers.

940: 1078: 2452: 774: 31: 3295: 3239: 3043: 1466: 1557:

Hendrix for example he has released over twice as many live albums as studio albums yet they are all listed in their own section and I think it is in he best interest of the page and wiki in general to have them the same. If you calculate the studio albums and live albums they haven't released that many more live albums than studio albums (not included live instant albums) 12 studio albums and 15 live albums.

3353: 3101: 2833: 2607: 2507: 1877: 1778: 1682: 804: 574: 301: 218: 1581: 2932: 2169: 3314:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3258:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3062:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1485:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1716: 3699: 2700: 1954: 470: 3583:

says "This does not mean that you have to be the primary author, though it is preferable. Merely copyediting or wikifying an article does not constitute 'significant work', but if you are one name on a joint nomination, you may claim points." I've never done competitions so I don't know how it works

1216:

between my first edit and the current version. Aside from the above re POV, a lot of text was simply moved or merged in a way I thought had a better flow and were more interrelated. Other stuff is rv "Keating" when overused and replaced with a pronoun provided it was clear which Keating (Charles) was

3598:

With Mitt Romney, I had some input on the FAC and made some edits to the article but you reverted and you and another editor worked out what to add back. I only state that I have contributed to the article and only a slight amount of input and just mention it is FA now. Ford Island was an invitation

1639:

Accessdates are only required for web pages that don't have clear publication dates associated with them. For example, an organization's webpage that lists the members of its board of directors or the history of its development typically won't have a date on it, so you need to include an accessdate

1556:

Hi can we discuss the edits of The Allman Brothers discography please I know that it was previously decided to have the page the way it is but that was 7 years ago and I think the page needs changing, I know that the band are a band known for live albums as it states on the page but if you take Jimi

2034:

The solution I suggest for both is, for the first one, to include the part of the Coyle sourced comment dealing with her age which identified her as among the three youngest members of the court. This seems relevant to the issue of experience which is normally discussed in such articles. Second, to

128:

source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users

2050:

Only a short follow-up, and with appreciation for your multiple edits on Sotomayor during the week. My efforts to bring in the material from the three new books dealing with Sotomayor are almost complete. The "missing" section on her Supreme Court cases was left out at the last GA review since her

2030:

were posted yesterday. Presently, there are at least three new books on the Roberts court which have come out this year and last year. It seemed that this would be a good opportunity to bring the page up to peer review upgrade status. This is the plan and perhaps you and others you may know would

2410:

I know you have (amazingly, with astonishing and life-sapping persistence) attended to articles in such a way that you alternatively could have made a living from the effort, by converting that knowledge into book-length biography, book-length analyses, or long-form journal articles published by

2090:

Hi Wasted Time R, These url updates are interesting, and still it is an option to rely on the cites alone without url since there is no reason to suspect they are not valid. Otherwise its in slow motion to update the url's manually. What about leaving the cites and dropping the unlinked url's to

2429:

Well, thanks for the kind words, but in actuality I don't do this as much as I used to. As for longer-form wiki-like entities, a bunch of them exist for entertainment topics where there's no such thing as too much detail (Memory Alpha, Wookieepedia, etc), but I don't know of any equivalent for

1338:

What's in a name? It's no biggie. I'd be ecstatic to have her Knowledge (XXG) article named whatever she wants, if she promises to stay in New York. :-) I honestly thought that the large majority of book titles speaks for itself, but really it's a rather trivial thing, though I wonder if the

1252:

OK, if you want. I'm sorry. I was only trying to improve the article. You can delete my edits right now, go back to the last best edit and work from there. I didn't know you were that article's maintainer. I've never edited the Keating article anyway as far as I remember. About the hidden "ISBN

1184:

I restored the deadlink I removed. As far as POV, I would say terms like "Indeed" (not in quotes), or "well known", rather than just "known", depending on the circumstances. Stuff like that. Why don't you compare the diffs and see if the article doesn't look a tad better. If not tell me where I

1623:

Hey, can you explain why removing 'accessdates' from citations is necessary? I include the access date in all my web citations, is that not the policy? I'm sure I am missing something, but please point me in the direction of the reasoning for this, so I can understand when and when not to use

392:

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the

2071:

Thanks for your note and my appreciation for your updates to the article. First, that must have been a busy morning for you. The chronological sequence of Sebelius was separated (from Wheaton College) and I'll date it to make the sequence clear. In the section just before it, stating the

2347:

Because Eden and Cedar Paul were at one time well known, I moved their translation role (which can be seen in, or cited to, any of these English-language editions) from the external links up into the lead. The bit about it first going through an Italian translation I took from the

1709: 1700: 2051:

history on that court was too short back then. Now it has the missing section, along with about thirty added new edits, and possibly you might like to join to co-nominate for featured article peer review. Two editors are needed for this and your knowledge would be appreciated.

388:

or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

1654:

Ok. The portion about accessing dead links was going to be my point. Because it gives editors a gauge as to when the page was moved/archived at the source. Pinpointing a time period often helps locating alternate web links. In any case, thanks for the explanation.

1604:. Because of some wonderful teamwork during the last month, the article is among the best on Knowledge (XXG) today. I couldn't have done it alone, and I hope that someday I can return the kindness and generosity that I've enjoyed during this process. Cheers! 1601: 1437:

Thanks for that, Wasted! FTR, you made several crucial suggestions before and during the PR that really helped tie the narrative together, but now it seems as though we are left with non-FAC criteria nit-picks that could just as easily be addressed at the

2411:

mainstream or academic press. I don't necessarily intend to engage you on the philosophical topic, unless you're interested and willing, but there is some kind of opportunity to think about what long-form wiki-like entity would support long-form topics.

911:

on March 12, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask

1011: 2641: 2458: 2451: 184:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

1597: 1384: 1365: 1726: 1422:

It's safe to assume that I've made all the suggestions or comments that I think there is any chance of you accepting. But I did just put in a couple of defenses of the article length and the audio caption length.

1804: 3676: 2095:

page under Health care with consensus of 4 editors but a lone editor is reverting against consensus. Is there something there which none of the four of us is seeing? Possibly you could take a glance. Cheers.

752:

I agree, and actually have a couple of aeronautical sources that seem to be authoritative and which do mention him in passing. Please hold the nomination for the time being, as I have to dig 'em out. thanks,

846: 3565:

I have a stupid question, as I am new to FAC discussions and article writing. I am a little embarrassed to ask this but...do I share in raising the article to FA or is that just the nominator of the FAC?--

3516:

Wholeheartedly agree! As an involved editor of this article for almost eight years I didn't think I should weigh in with support for its promotion to FA but am very glad to see it happen. Congratulations!

3599:

to take the article to FA and there was extensive work on the FAC and article and the FA status for that was gifted to me so I don't know how these things work but I'll just do what I did with Romney.--

252: 2545: 2404:

Philosophically, you indirectly raise the issue of what an encyclopedia is, and what a project like Knowledge (XXG) should be, by critiquing the level of detail that is appropriate to this project.

1309:

Looks like the Hillary RFC may be closed tonight. (Then we can move on to more important things, like convening a twelve-member admin panel to consider whether Tony Bennett needs to face forward.)

1108: 931: 3667:

to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon (either on a particular date or on any available date), please nominate it at

2407:

I admit to some concern about how to preserve access to the detailed facts of history that support the generalizations of this (and relatedly, any typical) article, in a project like this.

2811: 616: 3387: 1820: 409: 3672: 2990:

For some really odd reason, I think he has been around the barn a few times now - dunno if he has other current accounts, but this is not how a "newbie" would edit AFAICT. Cheers.

3784:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

550:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

927: 152: 1442:

talk page. If you feel there are any pressing issues or glaring omissions I hope that you will share them. Thanks again for all the excellent feedback; you've been a big help!

1003: 2465: 930:. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at 787: 454: 431: 335: 132:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

730: 173: 3779: 2651: 3139: 1031: 1324:

You were off by one night, but no matter, I am happy although I guess you are not. But like you said, this one is probably headed for the appellate courts ...

545: 203: 2878: 1901: 1730: 178: 2634: 2625: 1027: 725:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

2430:

political topics. There's SourceWatch, but that has a sort of different focus. I don't know whether there's an audience for something like that or not ...

3206: 2296: 2137: 687: 3410:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

3162:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2901:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2664:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2568:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1924:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1843:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1739:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

869:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1019: 856: 963: 3326: 3270: 3074: 2555: 1497: 2868: 2246:? I would rather add the cover to the infobox before I move it away from my userpage into a proper article. Please reply on my talkpage. Thank you. 2243: 1096: 168: 677: 2940:

Message added 17:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

908: 3397: 1830: 137: 3202: 2375: 2292: 2133: 1814: 683: 2193: 1528: 673: 3407: 3159: 2898: 2661: 2565: 2378:

article to "good article" level. Take a look at the conversation here among the three leading editors of this now quiescent article. See:

1921: 1840: 1736: 866: 332:, the only privately owned cruise destination in Alaska, has won awards for its preservation and economic reinvigoration of local culture? 1286:

MastCell reminded me - though my edits were in trying to improve the biography, but I note that you have breached 3RR yourself and might

3679:, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. 606: 442:, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! 419:, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! 3149: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 3384:

resulted in a legal decision that became influential in delineating what management must do when agreeing to a private equity buyout?

2888: 1911: 722: 1043: 923: 59: 3474:

Just noticed that myself. That was a tough article. I am highly impressed with the way you collaborate with others Wasted Time R.--

1717:

Template:Did you know nominations/United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

1023: 955: 439: 835: 822: 449: 426: 404: 394: 198: 147: 3775: 939: 680:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 541: 3461: 3199:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3023: 2684: 2485: 2289:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2130:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1759: 959: 889: 635:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

354:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

271:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3310:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3254:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3058:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1481:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2875:

was the first where a U.S. professional sports team streamed live games to its local viewing area via a mobile application?

2242:

Hello. I see that you've created File:Hard Choices.jpg. Would you please be able to create a similar page for the cover of

1371:

and I would appreciate any comments and/or suggestions you have for improving the article in preparation for FAC. Cheers!

385: 245: 236: 3359: 3315: 3259: 3107: 3063: 2839: 2613: 2513: 2374:

I would be interested in drawing upon your wide experience to make an informal assessment of what it might take to bring

1883: 1784: 1688: 1486: 810: 580: 307: 224: 2534: 2525: 2282: 3580: 726: 718: 3534:

Thanks again. As Tvoz knows first-hand, this one went a whole lot smoother than the previous attempts years ago ...

1938: 2352:

article, not a source. That's kind of borderline, and if you are uncomfortable with it, feel free to take it out.

3675:. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with about 1,279 articles 3411: 3393: 3306: 3191:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3163: 3145: 2902: 2884: 2665: 2647: 2569: 2551: 2281:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2122:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2101: 2081: 2056: 2040: 1925: 1907: 1844: 1826: 1740: 1722: 967: 870: 852: 664:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

636: 622: 355: 341: 272: 258: 38: 3771: 3250: 2950: 1344: 1314: 951: 537: 281: 2655: 1254: 1218: 1186: 1165: 987: 1900:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 445: 422: 400: 194: 143: 3723:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3623:

Oh and thanks for explaining that and for your civil collaboration on the Hillary article all these years.--

3589: 3539: 3493: 2724:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2435: 2357: 1979:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1645: 1428: 1329: 979: 493:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

47: 17: 3054: 1524: 3664: 3352: 3100: 2832: 2606: 2506: 2228: 1967: 1934: 1876: 1777: 1681: 1562: 1520: 1119: 803: 758: 601: 592: 573: 416: 300: 217: 3683: 3628: 3612: 3604: 3570: 3479: 3380: 3371: 3364: 3177: 3112: 2978: 2916: 2844: 2618: 2587: 2518: 2097: 2077: 2052: 2036: 1888: 1858: 1809: 1796: 1789: 1693: 1673:

DYK for United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

1477: 1104: 1100: 917: 815: 650: 585: 312: 229: 114: 104: 1087:

Thank you, Jonathan, for quality articles on people who appear on front pages (like yourself), such as

632: 351: 268: 3756: 2974: 2792: 2638:

was created in the 1960s to assist a wave of such women coming to the United States to work and live?

2419: 2391: 2379: 2012: 1505: 1340: 1310: 1015: 830: 522: 2815: 2770:

Biden gained a long-running alter ego persona, "The President of Vice", on the satirical news site

2767:&p_field_advanced-0=Author&p_text_advanced-0=(%22pride%22)&p_bool_advanced-1=and&p_ 2761:

p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=11/20/2007%20to%2012/20/2007

2401:

Thank you for your effort and and thoughtful response, which is genuinely appreciated and welcomed.

2266: 2251: 1999:{{cite web |url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html | 1993:

received over 17 million votes during the nomination process,{{refn|group="nb" name="ex11"

1060: 610: 3671:. If you'd like to see an FA appear on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to 3585: 3535: 3489: 3455: 3017: 2872: 2678: 2479: 2431: 2353: 1753: 1641: 1424: 1325: 991: 883: 860: 3488:

Thanks to both of you for the kind words. It feels good for it to finally have the gold star.

2752:

p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=8/1/2008%20to%208/29/2008

1701:

United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

1077: 2814:. (I am notifying you because you participated in the earlier discussion on these categories.) 2758:&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(%22timeline%22)%20and%20(%22biden%22)&xcal_ 1527:

that the administrative determination of consensus from that discussion is being challenged at

262: 249:

allows extra U.S. federal government spending in 2014 and 2015, but limits it in 2022 and 2023?

3789: 3743:

Walsh, Nick Paton and Capelouto, Susanna. [http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/14/world/europe/ukraine-

3507: 3334: 3278: 3222: 3196: 3133: 3082: 2995: 2559: 2335: 2312: 2224: 2173: 2153: 1558: 1295: 1115: 995: 780: 773: 754: 738: 703: 555: 369: 3668: 3680: 3624: 3608: 3600: 3566: 3475: 3429: 3173: 2912: 2579: 2286: 1854: 1541: 1149: 975: 913: 646: 328: 319: 3793: 3760: 3687: 3632: 3616: 3593: 3574: 3560: 3543: 3529: 3511: 3497: 3483: 3468: 3437: 3338: 3282: 3226: 3181: 3086: 3030: 2999: 2920: 2818: 2796: 2688: 2592: 2492: 2439: 2423: 2395: 2361: 2341: 2316: 2270: 2255: 2232: 2180:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2157: 2105: 2085: 2060: 2044: 2016: 1942: 1862: 1763: 1664: 1649: 1633: 1610: 1566: 1546: 1509: 1448: 1432: 1413: 1396: 1377: 1348: 1333: 1318: 1299: 1263: 1227: 1195: 1174: 1154: 1123: 1103:

and others, for convincing ("Advice for editing political articles: Don't."), for singing "

1064: 893: 762: 742: 707: 654: 559: 526: 373: 3752: 3748: 3703: 3192: 2970: 2788: 2784: 2704: 2415: 2387: 2198: 2127: 2123: 2027: 2008: 2004: 1958: 1501: 840: 518: 474: 188: 3579:

Depends on the context. For competitions, it depends on the rules; to take one example,

3311: 3255: 3059: 1482: 626: 3556: 3525: 3401: 2349: 2262: 2247: 2216: 1834: 1710:

U.S. House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

1660: 1629: 1056: 3390:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 3142:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2881:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2644:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2548:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1904:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1823:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1719:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1519:

Because you participated in the most recent discussion regarding the proposed move of

849:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 124:

status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the

3449: 3213:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3128: 3119: 3011: 2674: 2473: 2303:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2185: 2144:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1749: 971: 879: 694:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

665: 482: 2773:, which portrayed him as he was not but capitalized on his comic appeal.<ref: --> 3785: 3503: 3330: 3274: 3218: 3214: 3078: 2991: 2960: 2860: 2851: 2331: 2308: 2304: 2261:

The request is, can you please do it for Jeb Bush's book under fair use? Thank you.

2149: 2145: 2092: 1895: 1580: 1291: 1092: 1039: 999: 734: 699: 695: 551: 365: 345: 619:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 338:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 255:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 3712: 3421: 1605: 1532: 1443: 1408: 1391: 1372: 1140: 1088: 1048: 1035: 1007: 946: 904: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3747:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

3153: 2783:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

2642:

Template:Did you know nominations/Association of British Secretaries in America

2459:

Template:Did you know nominations/Association of British Secretaries in America

2003:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

513:

Alex Tresniowski, [http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20138452,00.

2984: 2892: 2215:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1915: 983: 3550: 3519: 2713: 1656: 1625: 121: 2091:

expedite? Separately, I tried to put the Sotomayor Hobby Lobby edit on the

120:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the

2539: 3502:

Just wanted to add my congratulations. You did a lot of work on this!

3716: 3376:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 3124:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2856:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2717: 2630:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2530:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1971: 1801:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1705:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 827:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 669: 486: 285: 1010:. He relaunched his political career after successfully running the 3009:

Just a few more things from me to adjust, and it'll be good to go.

2380:

User_talk:Yellowdesk#Dismissal_of_US_Attorneys_article_assessments?

847:

Template:Did you know nominations/Center of International Studies

2937:

Hello, Wasted Time R. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2542:

from its developers and showmanship from its founder and leader?

1164:

Sorry. I was just trimming in light of Keating's recent death.

986:

in 1969, with whom he has had five children. After studying at

253:

Template:Did you know nominations/Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

3347: 3095: 2827: 2601: 2546:

Template:Did you know nominations/Advanced Computer Techniques

2501: 1871: 1772: 1676: 932:

Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/requests/instructions

798: 568: 295: 212: 25: 2244:

User:Zigzig20s/Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution

3293: 3237: 3041: 2930: 2468:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2450: 1464: 790:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

772: 597:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 324:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 241:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1339:

result would have been the same if Jimbo had not hobnobbed.

1002:. He unsuccessfully ran as the Republican candidate in the 3663:

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of

3172:

Thanks for helping the DYK project maintain the main page

733:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

3447:

Just saw Hillary Clinton was promoted to FA. Well done!

1713:

is the fifth House committee to investigate this matter?

617:

Template:Did you know nominations/Huna Totem Corporation

3724: 3720: 3708: 3388:

Template:Did you know nominations/Netsmart Technologies

3195:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2942: 2807: 2725: 2721: 2709: 2327: 2285:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2220: 2208: 2204: 2189: 2126:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1980: 1976: 1963: 1821:

Template:Did you know nominations/Keith Harper (lawyer)

1213: 1136: 928:

Knowledge (XXG):Today's featured article/March 12, 2014

668:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 494: 490: 478: 133: 3325:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3269:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3073:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

1496:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3288:

Orphaned non-free image File:ImOnFireSingleCover.jpeg

2598:

DYK for Association of British Secretaries in America

489:

by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just

380:

Notification of automated file description generation

3737:

and appeared in ] in ] in December 2013.<ref: -->

3386: