181:, you need to provide some context for it. In other words, you need to write an introductory paragraph so people understand what the article is about (including people with little or no knowledge on Chemistry). Right now, the article is just a confusing and esthetically ugly page with lots of broken tables, numbers and scientific terms. You need to improve that page, or I'm gonna have to request its deletion via
211:
83:
23:
237:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
241:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
185:(if another editor doesn't do it first), since the content is inadequate. I can help you if you want, but first I would need to understand what the page is about. Thank you,
102:
Unable to identify context or subject of the article. I would CSD A3 it, but I'm not sure if it applies here. This is just a list of numbers and other non-prose data.
223:
234:
146:
150:
38:
because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
31:
138:
94:
72:
142:
227:
56:
250:
193:
165:
154:
125:
243:
218:
202:
186:
178:
158:
121:
90:
76:
35:
39:
182:
108:
107:
While all contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
43:
27:
131:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
252:
195:
167:
66:
81:
222:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
216:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
149:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
30:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
114:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
235:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Vsvp2109
8:
224:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
120:notice, but please explain why in your
7:
177:Hello, Weihe212. About the article
109:deleted for any of several reasons
97:because of the following concern:
14:
233:The article will be discussed at
209:
21:
1:
253:15:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
196:23:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
168:17:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
67:20:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
153:allows discussion to reach
134:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
117:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
268:
145:exist. In particular, the
139:proposed deletion process
32:your recent contributions
226:or whether it should be
126:the article's talk page
86:
151:articles for deletion
95:proposed for deletion
85:
173:Regarding Vsvp2109
143:deletion processes
87:
73:Proposed deletion
259:
248:
213:
212:
191:
163:
136:
135:
119:
118:
84:
65:
64:
61:
50:
25:
24:
267:
266:
262:
261:
260:
258:
257:
256:
244:
214:
210:
207:
187:
175:
159:
147:speedy deletion
133:
132:
116:
115:
82:
80:
63:
57:
53:
52:
44:
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
265:
263:
208:
206:
201:Nomination of
199:
174:
171:
157:for deletion.
137:will stop the
105:
104:
79:
70:
55:
54:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
264:
255:
254:
251:
249:
247:
239:
236:
231:
229:
225:
221:
220:
204:
200:
198:
197:
194:
192:
190:
184:
180:
172:
170:
169:
166:
164:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
129:
127:
123:
112:
110:
103:
100:
99:
98:
96:
92:
78:
74:
71:
69:
68:
62:
60:
51:
49:
48:
41:
37:
33:
29:
16:
246:Victão Lopes
245:
240:
232:
217:
215:
205:for deletion
189:Victão Lopes
188:
176:
161:Victão Lopes
160:
141:, but other
130:
122:edit summary
113:
106:
101:
89:The article
88:
58:
46:
45:
40:my talk page
20:
17:October 2012
26:Hello, I'm
155:consensus
93:has been
219:Vsvp2109
203:Vsvp2109
179:Vsvp2109
91:Vsvp2109
77:Vsvp2109
36:Vsvp2109
228:deleted
59:Message
42:. -
183:WP:AFD
124:or on
47:Teammm
28:Teammm
75:of
34:to
230:.
128:.
111:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.