User talk:Weregerbil - Knowledge (XXG)

125:

the group have had a profound influence on scientific directions of those who attend the group and their related research groups and institutions. The website that began recently documenting the group's activities is not run by me and I have no control over its content. However, the light-hearted approach that it takes (humour, references to beer, etc.), are intended to reflect the spirit of the "IS group" which is a light-hearted one. Although the group deals with serious issues of science and technology, it tries not to take itself too seriously. However, it is not simply a chat and beer drinking group (though there is nothing wrong with that), and has as much credibility as other groups documented on Knowledge (XXG). The item was added because numerous requests have been received over the years about the group (which is informal) and about how informal groups such as this have helped to shape the history of science. As indicated in its description, recent books have begun to document such informal history of science. It is important to add to the encyclopedic documentation of such history by providing information about this and other similar groups where and when possible. Knowledge (XXG) is already doing so and plays an important role in interactive documentation of history and science. The "IS group", and others such as "The Reality Club" the "Homebrew Computer Club" are an essential part of the history of science and technology. I am member, chair, or fellow of a number of reputable scientific societies. I founded this group many years ago and continue to participate in its activities. My credibility and seriousness as a scientist can be sourced and established on Knowledge (XXG) and in other documented locations, including journals, news stories, websites, etc. I strongly feel that documenting such groups helps our understanding of the informal networks that create the intricate tapestry of our current approaches to science, technology, and culture. This is what Knowledge (XXG) is about.

424:, an anonymous editor removed certain links, which I put back. They were removed again and I added them back. Later you removed them and added this note: "rv linkspam 'cleverly' hidden as 'rv POV edits". Would you please explain why these particular links are "linkspam"? It appears curious to me that external links that present the viewpoints of certain types of Primitive Baptists mentioned in the article have been left, while external links that present other views have been edited out.?? That seems point of view related to me, but perhaps I just don't understand. If there are better links that can be provided, I'm all for it. But if these are being edited because someone only wants one view of Primitive Baptists linked, there is something rotten in Denmark. Perhaps you did not check the history carefully. Perhaps I have no idea what "linkspam" is. Thanks. - 1475:. While it may not have been published, not one, not two, but THREE sources which Knowledge (XXG) considers valid (ObsessedWithWrestling.com, DeclarationOfIndependents.net, and SoCalUncensored.com) have published the articles. The fact that these sites are considered valid sources by Knowledge (XXG) is evidenced by their being included in the References section of many different articles. Whether the retrospective is actually published or not should not have any bearing on its inclusion in the article, as it is totally relevent to the topic hand. Please let me know how you feel about this. Thanks. 1488:

organized events related to professional wrestling which have entries on Knowledge (XXG) even though they have not been released yet/happened yet. As far as its notability, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be considered "notable," being that it directly involves mainstream celebrities (both professional wrestlers and adult film stars). Also, note that the original inclusion of the mention of the retrospective in the XPW article was made by Parsonburg, who has shown a respectable committment to Knowledge (XXG)'s integrity with his past contributions.

4518:

overwhelming majority of people, but I wanted to give evidence of its existence. The mere fact that so far there have been relatively few coverages makes it difficult to provide more detailed information from truly secondary sources. However, through my work and study with Elaine Summers I had a chance to create secondary writing, recently affirmed by the Postgradual Education Dance Unlimited (awaiting accredition as a Masters) in the Netherlands. I await to see how much that will count.

953:

technically the discussion can't continue any longer (unless an administrator decides to restore it on the grounds of sabotage). What I would like to know is why an administrator deleted it in the first place. How could he or she not have noticed that: a) The article was closed by someone other than an administrator, and b) That the discussion was nowhere near the proper minimal closing date of five days after the start of the AfD discussion.

5920: 1908:. The article was a horrifically bad piece of attack POV, almost completely unreferenced (discounting unreliable sources, of which it has plenty), completely unencyclopedic and full of original research to boot. It may actually be better to wipe entirely and rewrite from a stub, but for now I'm making some NPOV edits and removing some of the worst attacks, and adding cite needed tags. Please help me out, as editor 4444:. Unfortunately, I fear I must reject your advances, flattering as they may be, as I am not in a position to explore physical relations with you at this time. Please do not be discouraged by this however; I am confident you shall find a homosexual person to keep you company in that Special Way; just you keep asking people like you asked me. Thank you again for showing such keen interest in my penis! 2525:

believe that a couple, who are both lawyers, have common interests and common beliefs and positions? I don't think you get it. If we were not married, but were a couple of lawyers from different cities with similar interests, I doubt anyone would make anything of it. Wikipedians need to get over it. As I have been lectured by some admins that no rule is set in stone, I guess it applies to

1107:"A topic has notability if it is known outside of a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact. It is an extension of the notion of prominence for biographical articles. It differs, however, from fame and importance; while all articles on "famous" and "important" subjects are notable, not all notable subjects are famous or important." 21: 856: 4469:, willya?! "Faggot" vandalism happens 10,000 times a day on Knowledge (XXG); can't you somehow differentiate yourself from the great unwashed masses? Being boring is not funny. You are not funny. Try to be less boring please. From now on I will answer you only if you are non-boring; please consider any and all lack of response as "you are boring and useless". Thank you. 2644: 3163:

stuff, at this moment he is in a competition in Thailand, trust me, I'm part of his fanclub at school. You keep saying nothing can be found about him, follow the links on his wikipedia site and that's him, the african/asian looking kid in the hat. We are trying to add more to his site but we're busy with exams at school, as we are in year 11. Don't delete it.

3411: 2638: 920:

the only comprehensive adult image and movie database out there not dripping with ads. I've discussed this with other wikipedia editors and they agree. Even the rest that point to Knowledge (XXG) articles about sites are, in my opinion, spam, because they are blatantly commercial. But, I've left them alone. Thanks again for the laugh.

545:- I'm not saying that this page is the most important link for Eastern Europe, but unfortunately nobody has added any others. I think a photo gallery is a good resource for users who want to know more about Eastern Europe - "remember a picture says a thousand words". But I will try my best to find more good links for Eastern Europe. 5893:. I wanted to thank you for weighing in on the RFA--I will do everything I can to uphold the policies of this site, and try to make it a better place. All the comments, questions, and in particular the opposes I plan to work on and learn from, so that I can hopefully always do the right thing with the huge trust given to me. 1554:

magicianry to makeup artistry to pro wrestling to radio) - has endorsed the retrospective as well. So again, I see no reason why the authority of this "Bleeding Was Only Half the Job" entry should be questioned. If someone could give me a host I would be happy to upload the Ron Jeremy video which endorses it.

3672:

reliable sources were cited, one from a tenured Philosophy professor and another from an SNL transcript supporting the claim of Shatner's criticisms. Henceforth, I request you to refrain from making disingenuous remarks about "zero sources" in your edit summaries as it suggests a lack of sincerity. Thanks.

6104:

Hello and welcome back! I was going through a list of missing Wikipedians and saw you were listed. However, you edited again this year after over 10 years (welcome back! Hope you enjoyed your break). On the other hand, you haven’t edited since June. If you are a sporadic editor who comes around every

5332:

I haven't looked at the AfDs in question. I feel invitations to AfDs are a complex subject, as it is hard to draw a line between vote stacking and genuine disinterested informing of parties who may have experience in the subject of the AfD. I'm not suggesting you are doing something improper; this is

4149:

I just wanted to lend my support to your reversion of the Java article in regards to the performance perception. JIT-compiled languages like Java and the whole .NET family are beginning to out-perform their pre-compiled predasessors as more and more performance is gained via optimization. Thanks for

3126:

I appreciated your edit removing the spurious "courtesy title" of "9/11 Researcher" from Hoffman. Are there other examples of such incorrect attributions of titles or roles to named individuals in the article that you can see? It would be great to get the lot on one sweep, if you can see any. I've

3103:

A suggestion on how to distinguish between "9/11 researchers" and non-CT 9/11 researchers": For the latter, mention their relevant credentials or academic affiliation. That leaves bare "9/11 researchers" for the former (some of whom, whatever their shortcomings, have indeed done prodigious research).

2481:

I don't know whether you are married or not. If you are married, are you capable of independent thought from your spouse? When you vote in elections, are both you and your spouses votes counted? Or do you and your spouse only get one vote to split between you? How about your extended family? Are they

2147:

First of all, as stated in the article itself, the type of term that it is prohibits its proper usage in a form like newspapers or movie reviews. It is mostly used in speech. If you had taken the time to read the article, you might have understood that the type of usage it has prohibits it from being

2062:

I invited people to take part in a debate on a subject that they had previosuly shown interest. I gave no indictaion of the result I wanted, mere;y that their view would be welcomed. Please look at Neuropean 's contributions. He is a sockpuppet and is out to make apoint. He nominated in bad faith and

2015:

Oh don't be ridiculous. No, I don't expect you to be aware of everything, but if you read enough of the article to see my 'personal attacks', then the reason for them must have been glaringly obvious. You chose to warn me but not the other editor. I didn't involve you in this childish argument, you

1988:

Weregerbil, I contacted you about the internal spamming because I knew that you had had some dealings with Robsteadman. As far as your warning is concerned, I notice NO warning on Robsteadman's page about accusing me of being a sock, that is hardly impartial. There are dozens of pages on wiki where

1695:

Well, is it notable? Yes. They are a team that has played in the Thunder Bay area for a long time. I have at least 4 years of stats for them and a history. It will be much more notable once I've gotten to writing it. It is currently a stub only because I've had to do about 200 other sports teams

1143:

Why doesn't the world know more about this remarkable woman? I suspect the plain simple fact is, that Sturm is a modest woman and keeps a very low profile. That is her right. right. That fact of NOT looking for the proverbial spotlight is NOT grounds for an article on her being NOT notable. Do some

124:

Thank you for your concern about this item. The IS group is a serious group of intellectuals and scientists that has met for over 20 years to discuss issues of science, technology, and culture. It started at Haskins Laboratories and Yale University in New Haven. The topics discussed over the years at

5548:

But, it seems to me, these articles don't digress to talk about "wongo juice" -- they remain on topic, and describe the allegations used to justify the captive's detention, their testimony, if they testified, and press reports about them, when I have come across press coverage, in English. It seems

5238:, four of which refer to Knowledge (XXG) and the fifth is still about Pearl Harbor on "wikispiracy.org". It appears to me that there still are no reliable sources describing a debate, or showing how the randomly picked conspiracycruft in the article are a part of that famous reliably sourced debate. 3323:

on what I believe would be a better way to address the Hurricane Katrina related issues on Knowledge (XXG). I do find it rather unbalanced that for a company that's been in business for more than 80 years and is involved in many lines of business, present and past, nearly half the article addresses

2100:

I didn't know what their viewpoint would be. I merely invited them to take part because they had shown an interest in the subject matter and in order to widen the debate. I know its not a vote, though many don;t, I just think that having a good cross section of opinions is sensible. And, if you look

1213:

Hi Weregerbil, I am from the Welcoming Committee and in following up on some new users I saw that you and another had questioned the notibility/etc of a page created by a new user. The reason I am writing you is because I could not see link to the article's afd. I wanted to look into it and possibly

919:

Loved your comment ("may I have my nekkid girlz without spam please."). Made me burst out laughing. I've been removing some of the latest spam in the database section myself. Wanted to let you know that the second to last one you removed is actually not spam. I originally posted it because it is

465:

I wanted to share the new website with people, so they can see photos of Eastern Europe, which is exactly why I added it. It's not false advertising, it's not spam. I think it's a perfectly legitimate link for Knowledge (XXG) users to use at their own leisure. What's wrong with that? And even if you

5520:

In March 2006 the DoD started to publish documents about the captives. In the two years since then the DoD has published about 2,500 documents, about 15,000 pages. I've started articles that rely on those documents the DoD published. It would be inappropriate to insert my personal interpretation

4925:

We certainly do append judgement on the term 'conspiracy theory' Humus, whether consciously or not. Under this definition come such theories as those suggesting that the 'rulers of the world' are lizards (hello David Icke) or that the U.S. government are in cahoots with extra-terrestrial beings. In

3766:

I've cleaned these articles up to a more acceptable standard. Rather than biting the new editor by putting numerous tags on his pages, I think it would be more helpful to point him/her in the right direction, as at the time he didn't even have a welcome notice on his page. He seems to be creating

3177:

Hi Weregerbil. My apologies for the double redirect. I had THOUGHT I had been reading the behavioural psychology article just days beforehand --- and it turned out (when I bothered to double check this evening) another article that also began with behavioural. Sorry to have caused you extra work,

2185:

Thanks for your comments involving German organized crime. Please understand that the only source available is the U.S. Census. The only way to describe these people as gangsters is to say that they don't get caught. Please try to help me keep this article alive and to get through to people that

1553:

I am having a lot of trouble with the HTML on the page so that needs some work. I forgot to mention that Verne Langdon - who helped produce "Planet of the Apes," has appeared in many different magazines, has his own radio show, and overall is very respected in a number of different industries (from

4342:

Weregerbil, Please know you are under attack at Conservapedia. As well, there are numerous news articles about the relationship between MDS America and MDS International. The "breakup" between the companies was under a confidentiality agreement that has recently been lifted. As such there have not

3845:

I do understand why you have restored (or added) the link(s) to Google/Youtube videos to the CDH article. They add value to the article. The issue is one of highly debatable copyright and Knowledge (XXG)'s desire (as I perceive it from many discussions elsewhere) not to be associated with nor to

3709:

True. I don't know how one would measure it, but based on income alone (from another project I'm doing dealing with ABS stats), entire regions of Melbourne and about 4 suburbs in Adelaide are wealthier. Perth and Brisbane have very evenly distributed wealth with about 85% of suburbs within 1 SD of

3342:

article. I'm trying to work with the creator to see if he can provide some evidence of notability. If he can, then great... we'll have an article on a poster. If he can't, then of course it should be deleted, but hopefully the author will have seen that we aren't really a bunch of pompous bastards

2524:

This is not exactly true. We have collaborated on some things and some things we have not. In any event, that shouldn't matter. I gather you are not married. I think someday you will find that married couples often have common interests and common beliefs and positions. Is it that hard for you to

2470:

I don't know what your agenda is. There are 11 OTHER independent editors who voted 'delete' and had comments about this article. AND YES I DO THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO ADD MINE AND GFWESQ. THAT IS 13. THERE ARE NOW ONLY 3 KEEP. Last time I checked, even 11 v. 3 is a consensus. Gfwesq and I are NOT a

873:

that a bot counts bold "merge" "delete" etc. so if you want it to count them correctly, if you change a vote by striking it out (I saw you'd done this on one of Striver's hadith AfDs), you might want to also remove the 's. I made a suggestion on the talk page there that it make note of strikeouts,

4984:

240 is the maximum possible in the time frame the NIST report supports. Drywall can only release Sulphur when burnt and releases it at a specific rate. I suspect that 240 is far too high as it assumes more drywall was burnt than is probable in conditions that are not verified but at least it is a

1487:

It is written by a fan of the organization although its information has indeed been verified by several credible sources, such as those I mentioned above. I agree with you to a degree that Knowledge (XXG) "is not a crystal ball" but at the same time there are many examples of books, projects, and

1125:

Thus, Joanna was a key player in the life of the most famous presidential daughter in US history, Alice Roosevelt Longworth. And why - because Alice's relationship with Joanna was the ONLY 100% successful relationship in Alice's life. Joanna has made significant contributions to the making of the

1121:

and as Alice is a significant player in 20th Century US history, in particular, women's history. And why, because, Joanna, in effect was raised by Alice as a semi-daughter from the age of 10. Joanna was a witness to and participant in the last 22 years of Alice's life. She was more than a normal

5616:

Hi, I came by chance across the "Ragabonds" article, and noticed you had also had issues with it. I've spelled out a few problems in the Discussion, but it has now been over a year, and the organization involved seems not to be responding to the issues. There seems to be a certain perception on

5506:

In case you are still interested -- I write on controversial topics. I've played a big role in expanding the wikipedia's coverage of the war in Afghanistan, and the detention of captives apprehended there. Between March 2005 and March 2006, through google news searches I started articles about

3747:

argument is the most powerful and convincing argument I've had to counter, direct and to the point. And the answer is I cannot counter it, at least not at this moment. I am sure they have had articles written, but cannot right now produce the evidence. I would need time that I could better spend

2701:

I am a newbie to the wikipedia scene but by no means new to the notion of open communication and sharing of knowledge which is the whole reason for my venturing into this medium. Bulletin Boards were nice as are blogs, but they are not quite the same thing as what wiki has to offer which is that

3671:

Hi, regarding your comments in edit summaries, I have supplied several academic and reliable journalistic sources that support the criticisms. I also removed an unreferenced section. If you had read the article prior to my most recent edits, you would have seen (check throught history) that two

3162:

This article labelled Jason Lee (Tennis Superstar)is about a real person. If you google Jason Lee Tennis in google.com.au the first two sites at least will take you to stuff about him, plus he has his own profile on the Victorian Institute of Sport Page. Just so you know, he does not write this

2164:

Re: Please keep expressing your opinion on the matter but please also be mindful of Knowledge (XXG) policies on verifiability and reliable sources so as not to spend too much time on articles that do not conform to policy and have no hope of doing so. I'm saying that in all friendliness, in the

1135:

Joanna also was the chief facilitator of Alice being able to finish these important interviews and, by her support of this woman, literally prolonged her life into her 96th year. Withouth Joanna, Alice would never have lived to age 90 and ended up forgotten in some DC area resthome. Joanna has

1130:

over a period of more than five years that formed the basis of his book "Conversations with Mrs. L. which is Alice's only accurate auto-biography. She is pictured in that book in numerous pages. Indeed, the author thanked Joanna for making the interviews, themselves, and hence, the best "inside

2537:

I am not aware of the WP:3RR warning you keep citing. I did give someone a WP:3RR warning awhile back it is true. S/he was an instigator. If you followed the history, you would see that s/he had stated they read comments by jawesq and found them "emotional" and came to comment. Sounds like an

1112:

The subjects Theodore Roosevelt and his highly controversial daughter, Alice Roosevelt Longworth are subjects of intense historical scrutiny. In the past 30 years, no less than 20 major books have been written about TR. In the past 30 years, no less than 6 books have been written about Alice

4517:

My main goal in writing this article was to provide information to the category(??) of somatic disciplines, of which I found Kinetic Awareness to be a part. As far as notability is concerned, I admit this particular discipline of bodywork is not very visible generally and not practised by an

952:

I noticed your involvement in the discussion and your revision of the article creator's illegal closure of the AfD discussion, and I agree that reverting it was the right thing to do, but I'm curious how all this transpired in the first place. As you can see, the article has been deleted, so

5461:

The way I see it, either my challengers are correct, and I am a bone-head, and their references to your essay are a short-hand for a valid concern -- in which case what the article needs is a clarification so it can spell out what I am doing wrong so even a bone-head like me can understand

5700:

Please can you assist with "shaping up" my article on Schlemiel the painter? I've never written an encylopedia article before, and I guess I pretty much suck at it. Someone added "essay-like", and "unencyclopedic" tags to the article, and all of a sudden I fealt like a naughty school boy.

2168:

Is it a Knowledge (XXG) policy to not allow colloquialisms used in forums? For a colloquialism, you should only need to show that people are using it. I believe that is what I have done. How else would a speech-only (or primarily speech) type colloquialism ever get included in wikipedia?

212:

in the Security page because it is not spam and does not damage or effect the article in a negative way. If it does not seem fit because it is not complete, that is because I have not had time to finish with when you keep deleting it! It is perfictly legit and no one else is deleting it.

5748:

I've already posted a mugshot from the Nebraska corrections database, as well as references from The Chicago Tribune, The Orlando Sentinel, and The Cincinatti Post. In addition, it appeared on the national TV program, Unsolved Mysteries, which does have an article on Knowledge (XXG).

2705:

So to my own defense I really do feel I have made significant contributions in the area of Design Technology and very much intend to continue to do so and since that is the primary objective of my entry I would welcome any advice you might have to save my article from quick deletion.

3234:). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the 5534:

Now, if I understand your essay, if one of these articles was only nominally about the captive, but quickly digressed, so that it was mainly about the camp, that would be a lapse from the advice in your essay. Have I got that right? The camp would be the "wongo juice" your essay

4965:

should apply in the context of the introduction to that article. Specifically, that the article itself should best reflect the broader consensus of the reporting community and any reliable sources that can be found on the subject. If you have any comments, please reply there or at

2041:

Seriously, you see nothing wrong with ignoring an unproved allegation of sock puppetry on your talk page and then posting a warning to an editor who sees this allegation and provides a link to a proved case of sockpuppetry? Seriously? No, seriously? Me, I can't undeerstand the

755:

Hey no problem. I understand what you mean. I feel compelled to loose my civility and argue the point ad nauseaum, by it serves no real purpose. A the moment, he is the raving lunatic, and we're maintaining civility, which will go a long way for us. Your interpretation of the term

802:

I don't understand your comment. My last change was to finish up a fix of a vandalism. Before that I improved the explanation of the serious meaning of the thought experiment. I did notice that the history was unusually hard to follow. Perhaps you miss-attributed something.

501:

Actually, after reading Knowledge (XXG):Spam, it looks like your links aren't considered spam, because they're not commercial. About talk pages, you can chose to either leave comments here or on my talk page. Once again, sorry about that. --Khoikhoi 02:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

4484:

Thanks for the cleanup; I've used blockquote myself before so I think that will be fine. Although I didn't start the article, I've certainly come across the theory before and was surprised to see it didn't already have an article here; I'm sure I can dig out some references.

4380:

Thank you Knowledge (XXG) under the name of Weregerbil to give to us the IP address of WizardOfword this are right and confirm That Mr Harold Kirpatrick CEO of MDS America are Located in Stuart Florida for the Home and for the Business, Thank you again for your Kind Help.

4628:

The CuteOverload link is an inbound one, but is effectively a promotional item for a personal blog. I have not added an internal wikipedia page for Cxxxute.TV because I do not believe it is the most effective way of explaining that blog's content. (After all, it is video)

4513:

Hi, point taken and I've re-written the article the best I could, to meet Knowledge (XXG) standards and objectify it wherever possible. I will look at the article again in a few days to see whether this is OK now, if I see no further marks, I assume it will be alright.

3130:

I know you found the original article highly contentious. I can see why. I think and hope the various editors are making good progress on this to make it a competent and later an excellent article. Any extra issues you spot would be good news for a better article.

697:

Hi, you're probably right, but I didn't look into it. I just saw that he was a new editor, and was doing some massive edit warring. I blocked for 24 hours, but if he continues, he'll get a longer block, and if he's someone else, he may be blocked indefinitely. Cheers.

4884: 2963: 839:

I understand that these comments were made in a tongue-in-cheek fashion to bolster your argument, but some people may view these comments as being inflammatory, which is why I commented on civility. I note that this is the 2nd AfD on this page, with a related AfD on

5711:) by my boss, who is DEFINATELY a professional programmer, and many folks at work call instances of the problem "a Schlemiel"... but I honestly don't know if that's a "local idiom" or a widely accepted industry practice... nor do I know who I would ask such a thing. 4464:

Booooooriiiiiingggg.... Please expend some effort towards making your comments somehow interesting in the future, please. You have some neurons in your skull, huh, doya? Show it! "U r a faggot" and crap is just too 12-year-old. Surely you can do better? Be friggin'

2474:

An accusation of WP:SOCK and reality are two different things. I can easily prove this is not the case. Neither Gfwesq nor I should be considered as 'one' except maybe in the eyes of the Church. Thank you for your concern, though.jawesq 18:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

2813:

fd, arguing that it was not a article. BUT OF COURSE it is not, it not even supposed to be, as stated in the page AND talk page. The main arguements and circumstances are in the article it redirected to. This did not improve our relationship as fellow editors.

5475:

Alternatively, their concerns are misplaced, my contributions have complied with policy -- in which case the section on "what is not a coatrack" needs to be clarified, so they stop calling on the authority of your essay, for what boils down to an instance of

1635: 1522:

Yes, go to the sites I've mentioned. They are all considered credible sources by Knowledge (XXG) standards and are used as References in over 100 Knowledge (XXG) articles, and all of them have printed this retrospective. If you would like direct links let me

4307:

QA·C was listed there and the page was a simple description--no fluff; no advertising. You might want to compare to the others listed and linked for context. If QA·C cannot be listed then perhaps the entire "Commercial Products" category should be removed?

1059:

Pages about commericial organisations but only if they are already large and well established (ie 'noted' X times on google) External commercial links if the page has text about the 'key term' on it (even if its a page of spammy text that isnt written well)

3380:

Although I see your point, PM should have known about this "weird theory" when they wrote the article. I'm adding a similar sentence back. If you want to continue this discussion, use either my talk page or the conspiracy theoires discuission page. thanks

3053:

Yes, after thinking about you're were correct about that the majority of the articles weren't about the company as a subject. However, one of the BusinessWeek article the company was one of the subjects about its work on the American cable television show,

6105:

once and a while to add your two cents, please let me know. However, if you think this is it for you and you’d like to fully retire, I will add you back to the list (although I hope you decide to stay!). Hope to see you around some more! Happy editing,

1170:

article and see my expanded comments on Joanna Sturm's place as a collaborator and facilitator in the life of Alice Roosevelt and her contributions to virtually every Roosevelt historian in the last 30 years and to 20th Century Womens history. Thanks.

151:

will only devalue wikipedia. If you have any doubts as to a users intention it pays review their current contributions, in this case that's mostly what they had been adding in their previous edits (as well as spamming their favourite hungarian site to

4571:

You just removed the useful information about Bowers acronyms I created and deleted all the redirects I made. These acronyms are found not only on Bowers's site, but many other Web sites mention or use them, in addition to the polyhedron mailing list

3734:

is at least as much a personal attack as any I'm supposed to have made. Remarks such as "don't even try" "essays" and "running joke" seem somewhat disrespectful to me. The second half, though somewhat terse, at least stuck to the point. Weregerbil's

5125:

Number four sounds ridiculous. The persons "emerged". Were they under water, or lost, then? That is why I also do not like 2. That would leave 1 or 3, where I find 3 the shortest, clearest, and most neutral. How do you feel about option 1 versus 2?

1041:

Hi there, realize that the Canadian Army redirects to Land Forces, wondering what your reasoning was for removing the link. Just curious, as this link is the only practicable one that allows the reader to delve further into the Land Component/Army

2186:

gangsters don't get caught. Just curious, why do you think Joseph P. Baker is the only real person in the entire article? He's 17-years-old. Honestly, if you think this article is a hoax, that would most likely be the most fabricated indivdual.

744:

Listen, don't let yourself get too drawn into this argument with our friend Striver. He's just spinning his wheels. The article will be deleted once an admit gets a look at it. Arguing with him only fuels the fire. Thanks for your understanding.

906:

Details of a book on offshoring by Prof. Erran Carmel and Paul Tjia appear as references. Why not allow inclusion of Abstract of a new book by Mohan Babu "Offshoring IT Services : A framework for managing outsourced projects" (McGrawHill India)

2409:. One or both of these guys appear to be using Knowledge (XXG) to plug their artwork, and they are editing a number of pages related to their work in support of this. It would not be such a big deal, except they don't appear to be "notable" 5421:

When these patrollers assert that contributions I have made lapse from COATRACK I ask them to be specific as to which sections your essay advises are a mistake they think it lapses from. None of them have ever shown that they took my request

1952:]. I am assuming good faith in that Robertsteadman wasn't aware of Wp:Spam - although he did edit the page after you had warned Dmighton about spamming. Regardless, I look forward to seeing you act in your usual impartial way regarding this. 960:

as the final decision? None of this makes much sense to me: the hoaxer willingly has his article which he has been fighting to keep for a while deleted, and an administrator wrongly and prematurely deleted the article for some strange reason.

2482:

disenfranchised because you vote? Do you see how insulting and ridiculous your comments on jawesq's page were? I am my own person, I do not tell jawesq what to think or how to vote and vice versa. In the future please be civil. Respectfully,

461:

It is my new website, but it's not a personal website, it's a gallery with people being able to view and add photos. It's not a profit website, we have no advertising on the website. I have nothing to gain from it, so how is it spam?

484:

It's been removed recently by another person because they believed it was spam, and once I discussed it with them, they checked the Wiki Spam guidelines, apologozed and allowed me to put it back up. Now, you take it off once again.

2533:

and apply it my case. That and learn how to examine writing styles. An examination of style should tell any intelligent reader that jawesq and I are not the same. There is only so much I can do for those incapable of that analysis.

317:

now so my job is done! Personally, I try not to get sucked into fighting vandalism because it's too addictive and, like you said, just feeds into more vandalism. There's so much, it could turn into a full-time job by itself. :)

3120: 2995: 1136:"inside the Roosevelt family" view that only a literal handful of living Roosevelt family members have. You can count them on one hand! Joanna has provided information to virtually every Roosevelt biographer of the last 30 years. 4265:

but you probably should be aware that a user with a newly created account at Conservapedia, whose Conservapedia account name is "Weregerbil," has posted a suggestion at Conservapedia that people should vandalize your user page.

822: 1764:

which doesn't include it. Can you please explain briefly what has happened in the meantime? I wouldn't want to add unnecessary entries either, but really think this is common enough. So, do we have to create a wictionary entry?

3573:

Thanks for doing that. Whilst cleaning up that page, I spotted Rodriguez, who at the time was a blue link. The Afd I started was successful, but I then forgot all about going back here and removing the red link! :-) So thanks!

1696:

in the past 2 months. This teams is also a team that is eligible to compete for the Keystone Cup which is a national event and has competed for it on multiple occasions. I plan to expand this article in about a week or two.

4929:

So, it has connotations that the term 'alternative account' does not. I thought we wanted scholarly objectivity on Knowledge (XXG): using glib popular terms at the expense of neutrality does not help towards such an aim.

2808:

Brother Weregerbil. We have talked before, and we have not always agreed. But this one was clearly bad faith, you could just have taken on my offer on turning it into a full redirect, but no, instead you made it into a

5044:

Weregerbil - I noticed you removed a link I added to external links. It seems I am having trouble understanding what external links are acceptable. Could you please explain what is an acceptable site to include? I see

5827:"... significant portions of the cores of both buildings (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) are known to have stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse." 4575:. This is as notable and verifiable as you'll get in this subject, and it's pretty obvious that, while they may have been just 'made up in school one day', they're established enough now that they're not going away. 3849:

The challenge with linking to them, unless their copyright is explicitly noted somehow, is that there is a properly intentioned loose collection of editors and admins who are patrolling for and removing these links.

3008:

Yeah, I agree it should be rolled back into the conspiracy theory article and cut to what reliable impartial sources say. But the AfD is so "keep"ish already I don't give it much chance of happening, unfortunately.

2430: 2319:

Most of your edits are reactions to other people edits and thus almost all of them qulify as reverts (cause you undo editing by others) here is a partila list. This is your last warnning I am not intersted in long

3041: 3915:

was blocked indefinitely for removing referenced material from that same article (as you just did - although it was I that unblocked him)... however my point is that removing cited material from articles because

269:

I suggest you actually try the links before making decisions. For if you had explored the links you would have found that they displayed a veraity of security systems and more would would be added to momentarly.

6065:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2614:"The couple in this case appear to have contact outside Knowledge (XXG), such as when I write on one participant's talk page, the other responds." It would be helpful if you could supply diffs for this. Thanks. 2142:

which you state that "non-notable phrase (neologism/protologism). Let it catch on first; document it after major newspapers start using it in movie reviews. Not when a handful of people use it in a chat forum."

1993:

aware of it. So please don't send me advice when you ignore his failure to AGF and his repeated violations of NPA. Every time he refers to me as a sockpuppet, I will keep adding the lonks until he removes the

2240:

made simple, and TA is pretty simple-minded to start with. If you have some statistical expertise you might look at some of the claims of statistical significance that they are now making in the TA article.

4538:

Some hint as to what precisely is needed would be of assistance. The article in question is about a website with a fairly active user base, and while still early days, it does have about 250 pages of content.

4185:

Obviously not all models in there are notable, but I'd rather have an AFD with an extra set of eyes to be sure I'm not missing anything. If your eyes say hoax too, I'm reassured deleting it was a good call. -

5617:

their part that as a charity, the guidelines and rules are allowed to be bent. The only significant change since you mentioned a problem is for them to add a sentence about how much money they've collected.

5714:

I don't honestly know if this problem has a "proper" name, I suspect that some Dr Supergeek somewhere has a latin derived name for it, which never caught on, coz it's just like totally meaningless dude!

4499:

I'm curious. Where are you headed with the drinking games? Merge quickie descriptions into the drinking games article? Delete all the drinking games articles? I would hate to duplicate your effort. --

3911:

I do take issue with this. The "joke website" is the OFFICIAL website of the "Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster" - so is obviously a notable source (allbeit a primary one). Its worth noting that

5333:

just in explanation as to why I'm ultra sensitive to anyone telling me about AfDs for any reason, and why I'm unlikely to participate in AfDs that someone has told me about. ...Wait, did I just give

1964:

I invited people to take part in a debate on a subject that they had previosuly shown interest. I gave no indictaion of the result I wanted, mere;y that their view would be welcomed. Please look at

1810:

ACHTUNG: This article is not a dumping ground for arbitrary variations. Any variation added here MUST already have a Wiktionary article, and satisfy the Wiktionary criteria for inclusion as a word.

3853:

I can't really work out what the correct approach should be, here, other than to source permission explicitly for such use and lodge that permission with Knowledge (XXG) via OTRS in the usual way.

3592:

instead of having long winded debates that cover 2 or 3 subjects The we we know everyones objections either way, we can work out a compromise on each point with a view to reaching a consensus. "

3035: 1538:

OK, check the XPW page in a few mins and I'll have two links up. Although even without those links the article should still be considered valid in my opinion for the several reasons stated above.

5183:. I'm thinking there is a bug (feature?) somewhere in the Knowledge (XXG) software that occasionally lets edit conflicts go through without the good ol' "edit conflict, whatyawannado?" message. 2529:

as well. In any event, I am not going to change my beliefs or my spouse over to satisfy some imaginary question of sock puppetry by some Wikipedians. Some folks are just going to have to read

2750:

Didn't you notice it was only 6 minutes old when adding the db-band tag? I'm not sure of anything, but the page can be in process of editing right now. Just give new pages some time to evolve.

1890:

Hello Weregerbil, just a note to suggest that relative to your commentary there you might want to clearly indicate your support (or not be it the case) to Kim Van der Lindt's proposal. Thanks.

102:! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the 3743:. This would have been in line with the Knowledge (XXG) policy of assuming the good faith of another editor, even (especially?) when you believe them to be misguided. One Night in Hackney's 3286:

You have nothing better to do than attempt to delete people's work, when it is correct, and you have no written evidence of this works non-existence. I suggest you get a life and grow up.

3077:"Pentagram was asked to rethink the set -- as well as the show's graphics -- after its successful collaboration with the Stewart team on America: A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction..." 1148:

I will be footnoting this article to provide additional background information to establish the validity of this article. This process is very time-consuming, but I am starting on it ASAP.

812:

The history does look like I restored the vandalism instead of the original link. I don't understand this, as I checked by following the link from "Show preview" before saving the edit.

4961:. I wanted to let you know that earlier this morning I tried by best to explain to the best of my understanding how the NPOV guidelines (particularly that of Undue Weight) and the use of 3243: 1950:

articles. But the editors he contacted are those who have either edited the article or who have offerred him some kind of support. This is a much more blatant example of spamming than

535:

Please don't remove it. I understand this is your opinion, but I don't agree with it. I've consulted other people, and the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines, and it isn't breaking any rules.

3724:

I had just typed this comment to the Nemesea debate and was about to upload it when at that moment an admin closed the AfD. I therefore submit it to you direct, for your consideration.

1162:

Knowledge (XXG) also defines a notable biography as "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events." Joanna Sturm falls precisely into this category.

5435:

I am, of course, as fallible as the next guy. Maybe my contributions really were about "wongo juice", and I was too focussed on the details to appreciate that. But I don't think so.

2841:

Weregerbil, the afd closed. Would you preferer if the article would be deleted? In that case, i could offer to speedy it, as the creator of the redirect. Rather that then cultivating

3792: 946: 294:

Hi. I don't know if you're really new or just a new user ID of an existing person but I see you're finding a whole bunch of vandalism. Nice job! You might want to take a look at

313:

You're probably right about not sending a note for every one - but I still do. If for no other reason than to let them know it's been caught and reverted. Anyway, you know about

2281:

The best would be the check all your edits in the last 24 hours, count how many reverts there were (many) and self revert all but the first 3. You can start with the last revert.

6133: 565:

You asked whether you should remove completed (or redirected) entries from the list. I usually like to wait a couple of hours or a day until I remove a listing because somebody

6128: 3533:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

1117:

In virtually EVERY major work on EITHER of these Roosevelts, Sturm has a significan resource. As of the 21st Centurym she remains the most valuable living historic resource on

2442:

Your comment was irelevant because the issue is not at all if I was right or wrong to advertize the Afd. The issue is Homey FALSE claim that it did had an affaect on the Afd.

1416: 4006:

You keep teaching me how admins are supposed to behave: the first thing in an edit disagreement start talking about how other people get blocks for similar edits, and your "

574: 559: 178:

or I will have to report you. History, and the TRUTH are permitted on Knowledge (XXG). What I have added is legitimate, sorry you do not agree but that is TOO BAD for you.

1919:. I expect he may attempt to revert my NPOV changes. If I can't get the article to an NPOV state, I will put it up for a speedy AfD. I'd appreciate your help. Thanks, 4926:

popular culture it is always used to refer to the incredible (I use the word in its literal sense). It was used consistently with reference to 'The X-Files' for example.

785: 774: 190:

If you think I am vandalising, you know what to do (when you get unblocked). For any third parties reading this: check out the persistent Rick Blatter political spam on

1843: 5314:

respondent claiming authority under your essay to justify deletion. I remain curious as to whether this is what you had in mind when you drafted the essay. Thanks!

519:

I just don't understand what's wrong with a link to photos? It's useful for the users. Plus, I've seen many other pages which have links to similar photo galleries.

3363: 1152:

Just because one of our esteemed editors may be unfamliar with Joanna Sturm is not grounds for removal. In the meantime, I welcome discussion on this issue. Thanks.

828:

Just wanted to explain further. I mean no offense and I understand the points that you are making entirely, I just think it's superfluous to make statements like:

6020: 5235: 3060:

on the program's redesign set, screen graphics, and first published book in 2004/05. That article is probably the closest thing about the company being a subject.

5997:

If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Java technology in Knowledge (XXG), which may be more than ALL other programming languages articles combined...

4440:

Thank you for taking an interest in my sexual preferences (which I shall hereby assume you are indeed discussing; as opposed to, say, asking whether I might be a

4284:

one that's all that closely followed; I've already removed the handy link to your user page he provided, and I've posted a note on Conservapedia's "abuse" page.

2515:

Somehow you and your spouse seem to find the same articles to edit, do the same reverts and edit warring, "vote"AfdIsNotAVote(TM) the same way in AfDs, and give

1352:

Thanks for your comments on Raphaels talkpage. For your information, he has just recently returned from a week long block for disruptions on another article. --

1010: 889: 4722:

while I was busy reporting his second violation. By the time I had remembered to warn him, you had already covered it for me. Thanks for taking care of that.

3541:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at 5890: 4454:

You're right. I love to fuck gerbils on a basis daily, brah. But the thing is I'm in love with just one gerbil, you, Weregerbil. With much love, xoxoxoxox,

1734:

Because of the speedy close on the first nominatio I have reoprned the nomination for deletion of this non-notable team - it would be good to have your input.

5704:

Since then I've done my best to unearn the "essay-like" tag... and I think I've suceeded, but I won't remove the tag myself, as I expect I'm probably biased.

2255:

You have reverted many many times in the last 24 hours. Suggest you self revert (restore the lead) or your reverts will be reported and may getblocked. Best,

5408:

In my experience new article patrollers, and deletion fora participants, routinely mis-quote the policies, guidelines and essays they cite. It is a problem.

2124:] - sadly, as you can see, he is continuing today. What do you suggest? It is very hard to AGF when someone (a clear sock) is virtually stalking me on here. 1027:

I noticed your messages got shorter as you progressed through the Family Tree AfD's - did you get as bored as I did of seeing so many pointless articles? :P

5395:

For the record your essay is frequently cited, as if it were an official policy, not an essay. Your essay makes some good points -- but it is not a policy.

4846: 2641:

I urge you to carefully examine Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and rules, and then carefully consider whether you have an opinion on the matter. Your friend.

1590: 1583: 4958: 3796: 2907: 4172:

model isn't notable? As far as I can tell from my Google searches, she's not verifiable, but I could be missing something obvious. Isn't this for AFD? _

2471:

potential WP::SOCK and we can prove it. I gave no 3RR warning on this basis, so I do not know what you are talking about.jawesq 17:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

4346: 4234: 3614: 2016:

chose to involve yourself. Well, as you have done so, at least act in an impartial manner and don't complain when you are pulled up about not doing so.

4621:

You have marked it as "linkspam," but I am uncertain of your reasoning. After all, both CuteOverload and Cxxxute.TV deal with the same topic -- namely

3423: 2541:

Its my observation in large firm/corporate politics, friendly warnings are not actually friendly. Despite this experience, I will view you message as

1264:, since it seems to have some otherwise valid content, and removed the redirect from the protologism. Please let me know if you disagree with this. -- 1228:

They were not of my doing, and as a recent contributor to Knowledge (XXG), I am being merely curious. Why are the recently removed music links on the

4898:

I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Knowledge (XXG).

4585:

In the AfD, all the 'delete' votes were presumably from people who knew nothing about polyhedra or why these things are necessary and useful; whereas

569:

be interested in the fate of the article. However, I think it is perfectly fine to remove an article that you have dealt with if you provide a decent

458:

I added a link to a new public website with Eastern European photos, ee-photo.com and you removed it, classifying it as spam. Am I missing something?

259: 5864:

Hi, I hope you don't mind, I history-merged your old userspace version of the coatrack essay into the (now firmly established) project space version

5845:

I'm not allowed to edit the article or talk page myself, but since you seem to have made the original edit, I thought you might want to correct it.--

3550: 2405:

before..... Whoever edited after that removed your tags without addressing the problem, I think. I found it while following a chain that started at

1650: 82: 4615:

The Wikiepedia topics of "Cute" and "Cuteness" mention CuteOverload, a personal blog that has pictures of animals deemed cute by the blog's author.

3830:

22:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Hi could you help me rename the article inserting allegations before the current title i cant figure out how to do it.

3748:

elsewhere. Unless I get more supporting votes, I may instead let the defence rest and bide my time until the band grows bigger. At least Google and

5784: 5053:

are accepted and I am just wondering why the site I suggested was not when it seems to provide more relevant information. Thank you for your time!

3739:

argument is, to its credit, devoid of any unpleasantness and is a reasonable-sounding argument, and should have been entered on its own, minus the

2902:

I'll show every single lie and perspective, right there from the start, from election, to forming Al Qaeda, to Katarina, to Armenian genocide…

835:"Are these people Muslims because they really are or because they live in countries where they are likely to be beheaded for not acting like one?" 5521:

into those articles, as to the credibility of the allegations against the captives, and the credibility of their testimony. I haven't done that.

3145:

The titles of my books are a bit wierd but now they have been translated properly. Here's at least one website "proving" that these books exist:

2765:

Tagging pages from the recent changes list is perfectly valid. The tag itself indicates to an editor who might be "in progress" how to respond. -

1297:

What I did with the article was expand that definition slightly and provide an example of how the "invisible university" works in that context.

4945: 4590: 2794:

first. This reduces the volume of pages that hit the AfD process, and results in removing a majority of the cruft. Thanks, and happy editing! -

4735: 1083: 1056:

Thanks for the quick lesson about placing external links and writing pages for inclusion. I've learnt that wikipedia (or weregerbil) allows:

1968:'s contributions. He is a sockpuppet and is out to make apoint. He nominated in bad faith and is upset because things aren't going his way. 1370:

What you call "tongue-in-cheek" resp. "levity", I call "blatant racism". Anyway, defending such a website tells a lot about your character.

989: 6090: 5601: 5337:

instructions how people can pre-emptively kick me out of any AfD simply by telling me about it? Shit, back to the drawing board I guess...

4654: 4632:

In essense, I believe it is quite hypocritical for you to leave CuteOverload, but remove Cxxxute.TV from the "Cute" and "Cuteness" topics.

3772: 3534: 3302: 286: 4082:

I disagree with your interpretation. While "Your edits are childish" technically refers to edits it is not appropriate on Knowledge (XXG).

466:

disagree with me on that, I've seen so many other websites listed that are in the same position as mine, so why are they allowed to stay?

2717:

Yes, I'd like to make a video of what I do on my screen. How do I do that? Is there any software? Thanks. Reply on my talkpage, please!--

5872: 5620: 4431: 4350: 3875:

Yeah, there's some chance of that :-) I don't think I've ever added a YouTube link anywhere, except maybe when reverting page blanking.

3812:

Hi Weregerbil i noticed you put some kind of tag on the article, where could we discuss this, i can maybe address some of your concerns

3618: 1681: 247: 5950: 3791:

Seems to me this should go right to AFD. A Google search shows precisely two hits for the phrase, and they're both on Knowledge (XXG):

314: 295: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 5764: 5586:

HAHA! i'm sorry, i couldn't resist! i just love witty vandalism... you should have left it how it was though! It won't happen again.

4786: 3931:

Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate regurgitator of every joke that Henderson makes on his web page. Please see

2197:

Amazingly long time for a vandal edit to stick around, but the deceptive edit summary was especially well-done. Thanks for the fun! --

2079:. As far as your statement that you will drop out of this conversation, feel free. Feel free to stay away dfrom my page altogether. 1935:

attempt to sway consensus by encouraging participation in a discussion by people that you already know have a certain point of view..

850: 3546: 3196: 2903: 2859:

Hi... I just saw you tagged them. Not sure if you've done one of those before, but you need to edit/make the daily page too I think.

4836: 5674: 4116:

You're correct, I certainly could have handled that better and I apologise. Tough day(s) at the office. Thanks for the heads up re

2637:

Given your interest in conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11, I thought you might be interested in one that was up for review. See

1833:

Ha ha, right. Thanks for the briefing! Checking it out more carefully, I found there are many other variations of the same acronym:

1067:

and I can see how many of these are deemed suitable whereas my page isn't.....no fun in looking up small software developers......

3710:

the median income, while Sydney, Adelaide and Melbourne have more disparity. (It's a comment only - would be WP:OR if I added it)

2639:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks

5662: 5142:

Call a spade a spade. That's what reliable sources do too. "Conspiracy theories" is what they are. Informative and to the point.

4003:

Oh, so you discussed blocking just for fun. Like you would discuss the weather. You meant nothing by it. Smalltalk. Oooo...kay...

1446: 55: 5707:

The "unencyclopedic" tag I'm not so sure about. I can tell you that I was introduced to the concept and Joel Spolski's article (

27: 6086: 5900: 4957:

Hello, Weregerbil. I noticed that you recently voiced your opinion on the article regarding the current war in Afghanistan and

2934: 2911: 1126:

last 1/4 of Alice's life and the recording of Alice's story. Joanna was the main facilitator of Alice's famous interviews with

870: 369: 2755: 1281:

I first came across the term "invisible univeristy" as defined in the article I wrote when one of my freinds lent me the book

221: 87: 67: 51: 5869: 5799: 5733: 4863: 4519: 3530: 2502: 1096:

You brought up an important question, other than being the great granddaughter of Theordore Roosevelt, what else qualifies

4816: 4779: 3589: 2233:. How do we delete the whole article? I obviously need to read up on this, but could you point me in the right direction? 1293:-Tap into the vast resources of THE INVISIBLE UNIVERSITY--the global network of learning opportunities that surrounds you. 594:

Schildt.a menat that the math-related articles that DYLAN LENNON have interwiki-linked to ja.wikiedia lately do not exist

5986: 5549:

to me, if I read your essay properly, that all of this is like the astronaut in your example of "what is not a coatrack".

3422:

to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage,

3391:

He was quite right to delete it. You can't use 'should have known about this' as that is classed as original research. --

3324:

one recent controversy, but I also concur that simply removing the material is not the right way to handle it either. --

1814:

There is a ontinuous flow of freshly invented, little used LOL variants added to that page (and then removed). Check out

1286: 77: 5017: 4618:

I have added to the "Cute" and "Cuteness" topics Cxxxute.TV, which I believe matches the same criteria as CuteOverload.

4441: 2567: 2416: 1604: 6077:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5073: 4681: 3634:

Since you appear to have a changing IP address it's a bit hard to answer to you; I hope you see this. Do you have some

3538: 1846:

and got some 1,300 hits. There are also other interesting variations for the letter "T". Care to give them a look? :-)

92: 6082: 4246: 3969:

a) I already stated its a primary source b) I never "threatened" you (someone else blocked him - I - as I said above)

2908:

http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&lr=&q=clint%20curtis%20testimony&btnG=Search&sa=N&tab=wv

2652: 1677: 651:

Another thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page, I very much appreciate it. Thanks for all your hard work. --

144: 5038: 1472: 6110: 5981:

I recently posted the following text on Knowledge (XXG) regarding the creation of a new computing-related project:

5493:

Now maybe you see your role in the essay being essentially over? We are all volunteers here. You get to say that.

5023:

I think we crossed wires at least twice - probably more. Kinda funny, really. I wasn't getting EC messages either.

4941: 3785: 702: 2669:

I tagged this as patent nonsense right after you added the repost tag! What is it with vandals and repostings?? --

4729: 4579: 3776: 3545:. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to 3339: 3320: 3081: 3080:

Well good work on Knowledge (XXG), but I just disagree with your placement of the {{notability}} template. ;-P --

3044: 3027:

I'm not a graphic design major and not related to the company but I have heard of this company. It easily passed

3021: 1118: 1079: 107: 62: 5938: 5932: 5850: 5597: 4650: 3711: 3647: 3298: 2602: 282: 255: 5477: 5204: 577:

recently, and nobody has complained yet, so it seems to be okay). Happy editing, and thank you for your help!

216:

Thanks for experimenting with Knowledge (XXG). Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use

99: 5624: 4427: 4354: 3730:

By Weregerbil's own definition of what a personal attack is, I would suggest that the first half of his last

3665: 3622: 3068: 2402: 2139: 2101:

closely, I believe one of those I invited to express THEIR opinion has expresse an opinion contrary to mine.

1709:. My deepest apologies if I have been found offencive, but this guy is just a little much for a lot of us. 4967: 4842: 4600: 4191: 4177: 3673: 3557: 3268: 2827:

Well, sorry if you were offended. I got very uppset on that one. try see it from my pov, when articles like

845: 661: 5752: 5721: 5650: 5589: 4933: 4642: 4419: 3290: 2922: 2662: 2555: 2060:

Oh, whatever, weregerbil. There was no need for you to look anywhere - it was there on your own talkpage:

1071: 274: 6010: 5760: 5164:

Hi Weregerbil! You just made a rather odd revert on this page. Don't worry though, I fixed it up for you.

4723: 4367: 3651: 3164: 2647: 1753: 1673: 1654: 1261: 1243: 1075: 365: 6078: 4715: 4646: 4277: 3294: 2998:

article should probably be deleted, not edited...trying to get it to be NPOV is going to be impossible.--

2781: 2406: 2125: 2102: 1969: 1938: 1735: 713: 278: 251: 225: 6106: 5507:

dozens of the captives held in Guantanamo. I thought I was disciplined and stuck strictly to the facts.

4937: 4830: 4455: 4423: 3768: 2682: 2670: 1603:

The evidence of trying and failing to resolve this dispute (alleged blocking abuse) can be found in the

1506: 1215: 1064: 699: 5865: 5756: 5372:

For the record, I do not believe I did anything improper. The first time I asked for your opinion the

5280: 5259: 4996: 1819: 760:

is to my native english speaking knowledge correct. Don't worry about striver, he types horrid english.

675: 665: 72: 4684:

is never a criterion for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG). As for you "hypocricical" comments, please see

4134: 4122: 4053: 3984: 3922: 2718: 2577: 2076: 1505:

It is written by YOU and is nothing but an attempt to hijack the page to get yourself some publicity.

724: 5821:"The cores of the buildings began to fall 15 to 25 seconds after the initial start of the collapse." 5658: 4157: 3316: 2214: 1761: 1304: 1190: 841: 813: 804: 781: 6054: 6045: 5958: 5945:. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in 5054: 4314: 4225: 3491: 3111: 2926: 652: 619:

A reminder that biographies that do not assert significance of the subject can be speedily deleted:

217: 156:). It's also worth reviewing their edits to continue the clean up process. Keep up the good work. — 5906: 5846: 5788: 5725: 5593: 5069: 5058: 4822: 3886:

Licks egg off face* Yup. Mea culpa. Fooled myself. hardly surprising in this enormous article.

3542: 2930: 2885: 2866: 2744: 1607:. Unfortunately this dispute is rather short, because Cyde refused any further communication after 936: 684: 643: 613: 549: 522: 503: 486: 472: 323: 303: 239: 6074: 6058: 4806: 4756: 4162: 3256: 3031:

with the reliable sources. The company was featured in popular publications that you may heard of

2904:

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf#search=%22ohio%20hearings%20pdf%22

1384:

There is a True Crime 3 in production and a DS version called "True Crime: Diaries" in production

1167: 1097: 5942: 5729: 5567: 5319: 5291: 5169: 5028: 4971: 4857: 4795: 4699:

I do not answer to personal attacks. Please try to phrase your comments without attacks. Thanks.

4661:

The preceding comment has been modified by yours truly to alleviate any accidental SEO concerns.

4558: 4543: 4288: 4187: 4173: 4169: 3638:

that they appear in the Ohio Valley Wrestling roster? All information on Knowledge (XXG) must be

3554: 3032: 2594: 2559: 2546: 2483: 2457: 2351:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=63762653

2346:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=63808202

2341:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=63809923

2336:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=63817510

2331:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=63833707

2237: 2230: 1912:

seems determined to attack McKenna, having recently inserted a similar allegation, unsourced, in

1909: 1318: 965: 784:, it was actually the second time it'd been prodded. So as a contested deletion I've sent it to 720: 628: 403: 396: 243: 5334: 4302: 4238: 3856:

I'm not about to revert your relinking, I was simply wondering how you woudl solve this issue?

3267:

I have to stop now (too much coffee) and wanted to let you know in case you wanted to follow up.

2878:

Ah, I got it. My reasoning is actually based on the links I put up there. We'll see, good luck.

5072:

contains much on the issue. The existence of one junk link is not a reason to add another (see

4324: 2434: 1207: 964:

Should we just leave the discussion as-is until an administrator sorts it out in a few days? --

5989:

is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to the

5216: 5132: 5007: 4810: 3597: 3483: 2207: 2138:

Thanks for marking the article I wrote for deletion without even reading it. I'm referring to

1432: 1395: 1014: 893: 757: 421: 407: 6070: 6062: 5279:, and telling me if it is an example of the kind of article you had in mind when you drafted 3028: 2526: 2165:

interest of saving your time as well as others'. Thanks! Weregerbil 21:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

1847: 1766: 832:"(no fair depicting Mohammed in your basket! Must wear a burqa when weaving outside!)"; and, 148: 103: 5963: 5708: 4899: 4826: 4752: 4486: 3831: 3827: 3813: 3454: 3348: 2912:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1963391

2563: 1257: 1233: 1131:

Alice's mind" book ever written and I've read every biography of Alice in or out of pring.

1028: 347: 6073:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6066: 5818:

the following sentence into the current version of the article on the collapse of the WTC:

4719: 4685: 4673: 4231:

I have cut out the advertising-type language and added some references - is it acceptable?

4204:

Haha yeah you're welcome. He's been blocked now so hopefully that should be the end of it!

4117: 4036: 4007: 3800: 3691: 3687: 3419: 2542: 2530: 2516: 2410: 620: 5919: 5678: 5654: 5338: 5239: 5184: 5143: 5077: 4700: 4689: 4662: 4586: 4573: 4500: 4470: 4445: 4401: 4371: 4328: 4242: 4151: 4092: 4011: 3957: 3936: 3876: 3753: 3695: 3655: 3392: 3382: 3343:

who get off on deleting pages and he'll be able to contribute constructively elsewhere. --

3263:

Hi, creator detagged 3 times. I wound up vandal warning him. He also left an inquiry with

3178:

but I did end up learning a lot - and that is always a plus! Thanks for your patience. --

3010: 2944: 2584: 2365: 2299: 2266: 2242: 1822: 1443: 1353: 1043: 921: 875: 789: 598:, not that the figures or the concepts that those articles are about do not exist at all. 581: 195: 58:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: 5673:

I do have better things to do, but I am afraid I am prone to procrastination, and nuking

4962: 4554:

Want me to pull it till I can get someone else to write a better more compliant article?

4301:

I'm perplexed as to your proposed removal of the page. Could you please take a look at:

3953: 3932: 3643: 3635: 3549:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the 3487: 2298:

I already did that. I didn't find the 3rr violation you claim. Can you prove your claim?

455:

I'm fairly new to contributing to Knowledge (XXG), but I don't understand your policies.

3749: 3074:"James Biber, an architect with the New York firm Pentagram who led the set project...." 481:

Can you tell me why the ee-photo.com link was removed from the Eastern European article?

234:

The preceding "test" template was inserted due to a disagreement over external links in

6025: 5954: 5946: 5894: 5276: 4883: 4205: 3526: 3509: 3325: 3237: 3229: 3221: 3213: 3056: 2962: 2879: 2860: 2388: 2119: 2084: 2043: 2017: 1995: 1965: 1953: 1471:

I am unsure why you removed the paragraph in this article about a retrospective called

1194: 1181: 1127: 765: 746: 599: 319: 299: 238:. It is my opinion that the links are spam. The two editors adding the links disagree: 157: 111: 3949: 3639: 2265:

Could you please provide diffs of what I have reverted more than three times? Thanks.

2063:

is upset because things aren't going his way. Robertsteadman 19:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

372:. Instead, you can use the template by typing {{subst:spam}} on that page. Regards. 6122: 5563: 5315: 5287: 5165: 5024: 4850: 4790: 4677: 4285: 3887: 3867: 3857: 3804: 3519: 3367: 3205: 3132: 3038: 2978: 2788: 2624: 2615: 2606: 2172: 2083:

you must add warnings to my page, then make sure that you do act in an imaprtial way.

1891: 1723: 1710: 1697: 1616: 1594: 1420: 1399: 1371: 1362: 1339: 1229: 1172: 1153: 993: 816: 807: 624: 439: 425: 361: 191: 4582:. It doesn't make sense to give all the acronyms without explaining what they mean. 2456:

No I do not edit by Gfwesq. Gfwesq is my spouse, but I assure you we are not 'one'.

5376: 5308: 5266: 5212: 5128: 5003: 4770: 4760: 4635:

Please respond here, or on my talk page, as to what your rationale behind this is.

3912: 3593: 3575: 3247: 3149: 2846: 2832: 2818: 2735: 2155: 1920: 1913: 1905: 1634: 1412: 1388: 1335: 570: 402:

Actually, my knowledge of the math has become a little rusty. You might try to ask

5076:); there are spam links on Knowledge (XXG) because nobody has gotten to them yet. 4303:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis#Commercial_products

2364:

Err... did you notice those diffs are edits of three completely unrelated things?

2278:

This is friendly warning, not a formal report. I want to avoid having you blocked.

1394:

Greetings Weregerbil, I was wondering if you might express your editorial view on

956:

Furthermore, what do you think might have been the creator's motive for declaring

908: 224:

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

5783:

article, and I thought I'd let you know that I've nominated it for deletion. See

5158: 4986: 3447: 3344: 3179: 2795: 2766: 1752:, I've probably missed a couple of episodes or something. LMTO used to exist in 1565:

Weregerbil, did you get my last message (see directly above)? Thanks in advance.

1265: 728: 373: 343: 126: 3146: 2643: 664:. I just don't understand why Knowledge (XXG) still accepts anonymous edits. -- 642:

Hello Weregerbil. Thankyou for removing the vandalism on my userpage. Regards,

3264: 2999: 2751: 2198: 1815: 1566: 1555: 1539: 1524: 1489: 1476: 823:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Muslim athletes (2nd nomination)

578: 368:

by copying the template text there, but doing so places the user's page under

143:, I believe it passes the test and as a consequence I've removed it. Very few 20: 1334:

speak for himself. I wonder, why an editor with that attitude should edit on

4535:

Could you clarify your specific objection to the Lunarpedia article please?

4311:

Thanks in advance for investigating. Please let me know what else you need.

4211: 3982:

Please read messages more carefully before jumping to childish conclusions.

3795:

and the other referring to a notorious Jew-hater's posting on Stormfront at

1439: 1260:

as {prod} because the name was a protologism: I've now moved the article to

855: 387: 5677:

on Knowledge (XXG) is one of my methods of exercising said character flaw.

4985:

published claim. I'll leave it to you to remove the fact tag if satisfied.

3121:

Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center

2996:

Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center

2213:

I have edited the article to relfect notability, please take another look.

298:

and follow those procedures to warn vandals and/or get them blocked. :) —

2154:

Is Knowledge (XXG) only about history that can be seen in written form? --

2073:

He nominated in bad faith and is upset because things aren't going his way

1104:

Knowledge (XXG) gives some guidance on "notability," saying the following:

683:

Echoing everybody else here, thanks for reverting my userpage vandalism. -

386:

Thanks for smiting all that link spam on the Spyware and Adware articles.

5824:

It seems to be an attempt to paraphrase this sentence from the NIST FAQ:

4622: 3567: 3490:

to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please

2443: 2282: 2256: 235: 6114: 6094: 6037: 5971: 5912: 5875: 5854: 5805: 5768: 5737: 5686: 5666: 5628: 5605: 5571: 5448:

What I am wondering is possible is whether the essay could be clarified.

5346: 5323: 5295: 5247: 5220: 5192: 5173: 5151: 5136: 5085: 5062: 5032: 5011: 4989: 4974: 4906: 4868: 4797: 4773: 4763: 4741: 4703: 4692: 4665: 4593: 4561: 4546: 4522: 4503: 4489: 4473: 4458: 4448: 4404: 4374: 4358: 4343:

been news articles YET. Please research the subject or leave the edits.

4331: 4317: 4291: 4250: 4219: 4193: 4179: 4154: 4138: 4126: 4095: 4057: 4014: 3988: 3960: 3939: 3926: 3890: 3879: 3870: 3860: 3834: 3816: 3807: 3779: 3756: 3714: 3698: 3676: 3658: 3626: 3601: 3578: 3560: 3395: 3385: 3370: 3352: 3328: 3276: 3250: 3182: 3167: 3152: 3135: 3114: 3084: 3047: 3013: 3002: 2981: 2947: 2891: 2872: 2849: 2835: 2821: 2798: 2769: 2759: 2738: 2721: 2685: 2673: 2627: 2618: 2609: 2587: 2549: 2486: 2460: 2446: 2437: 2431:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for arbitration/Israeli apartheid/Evidence

2419: 2391: 2368: 2302: 2285: 2269: 2259: 2245: 2219: 2201: 2175: 2158: 2151:

Secondly, it's in several chat forums, not just one, including Slashdot.

2128: 2105: 2087: 2046: 2020: 1998: 1972: 1956: 1923: 1894: 1877: 1825: 1796: 1738: 1726: 1713: 1700: 1685: 1657: 1619: 1597: 1569: 1558: 1542: 1527: 1509: 1492: 1479: 1453: 1423: 1402: 1374: 1365: 1356: 1342: 1321: 1307: 1268: 1246: 1218: 1197: 1175: 1156: 1046: 1031: 1017: 996: 968: 939: 896: 878: 859: 792: 768: 749: 731: 707: 687: 678: 668: 655: 646: 632: 602: 584: 552: 525: 506: 489: 475: 442: 428: 410: 390: 376: 350: 327: 307: 228: 198: 160: 129: 114: 6061:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1806:

There is something of a consensus rule in LOL; from the HTML comments:

985: 3410: 1707: 1317:

Um, why is my article up for deletion? I worked hard to create that.

1122:

daughter, she was Alice's almost constant companion and facilitarot.

5953:. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of 5382:

was already concluded -- why I asked you to look at the google cache.

5272:

Coatrack was repeatedly cited as a justification for its deletion.

2918:. How about that? And I'll use logic, not this Milli Vanilli CRAP:)… 2828: 1442:. Sort of an out there spelling, so we might as well delete it. :) 5050: 3590:

Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories#Why_dont_the_Oppose_and_Agree_camps.3F

3202:

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as

2915: 6000:

At least, it's more than for C++, and there IS a C++ WikiProject...

5207:, since the banner on the page seems to be wasting people's time ? 5002:

What a great essay. Thank you for writing that. Very well done.

3588:

Why dont we focus on identifying individual points of objection at

3141:

Thank you for checking my articles about books by Alexander Soifer.

3127:

noted it as a point we all need to be careful of on the talk page.

2698:

Perhaps my entry would be considered a coatrack of self promotion.

5780: 4608:

Removal of Cute.TV cultural icon from "Cute" and "Cuteness" topics

3246:. Again, thank you for helping to make Knowledge (XXG) better. -- 1300:(By the way, that link was result number 21 on my Google search.) 674:

You should look again, I never removed, just moved it slightly. --

153: 5046: 3611:

why did you remove Milena and Tori they are both apearing in OVW

3424:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/September 11, 2001 Attacks

438:

The discrimination against Pastafarian religion is not a joke. --

6003:

And it's MUCH more than the .NET WikiProject with 82 articles...

3752:

will keep free access to information on the band until then. --

1722:

Excellent, that was exactly what I was hoping for. Thank you.

1237: 2943:

I'm sorry, I can't make heads or tails of what you are saying.

1989:

he has posted personal attacks and nothing has been done - you

1937:

so I thought that you might like to take some action regarding

660:

I also thank you for reverting (very quickly) the vandalism on

420:

Could you give an explanation of the following? On the article

5868:. It sat there copy/pasted without proper attribution to you. 1140:

She IS credited by virtually every TR biographer since 1970.

977: 182: 15: 2576:

Memo to self (or whoever is interested): discussion prior to

4578:

Also, they are already used in one Knowledge (XXG) article,

2387:

Do you actually turn into a gerbil during the full moon? :)

4922:

I'll just copy and paste here what I wrote on Humus' page:

3945:

Wow, you are an admin?! And you leave threatening messages

3793:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Alberuni/Evidence

1285:

by Richard Gross. I have since returned the book, but its

947:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/TropicaI Storm Jason

5709:

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000319.html

4400:

What? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying.

2415:

Will you help? I'm only one man (or Antelope).... ;) --

2397:

Help! Mariano Ristori Morakis is out of control, I think

1818:'s criteria for inclusion. Google gives eight unique hits 469:

Thanks for your time, I'd appreciate a reply very much.

5121:...suggesting that individuals...knew or carried out... 5951:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

5830:

But there's a significant difference between the cores

5816: 5779:

Hey, I noticed that you'd previously weighed in on the

5301: 5227: 5180: 5097: 4782: 4258:

Invitation to vandalize your user page at Conservapedia

4088:, eh? Is that also commenting on edits, not the editor? 4085: 3946: 3683: 3100:

Thanks for straightening me out about "sheer"/"shear."

2734:

Thank you, i hope you are satisfied with the answer. --

2581: 2350: 2345: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2195: 1917: 1757: 1749: 1608: 1463:

There is a true crime 3, I heard about it on MTV News.

1331: 932: 542:- the article only has two links, it's not a link farm. 339: 263: 220:

for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the

140: 6006:

There is also a Ruby project and a Python portal so...

3973:

him (how is telling you I unblocked someone a threat?)

2067:

I should assume good faith and assume that you missed

737:

Articles for deletion/9/11 Bin Laden conspiracy theory

575:

Knowledge (XXG):Pages needing translation into English

560:

Knowledge (XXG):Pages needing translation into English

4415:

I heard you were a on conservapedia. Is this true?

3935:

on the subject of self-published sources. Thank you!

786:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Captain Useless

775:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Captain Useless

5949:, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at 4010:" remark. I keep getting surprised by your lessons. 3503:

This message delivered: 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

844:

that was very heated. No offense to you at all. --

5258:Can I ask you for an opinion on interpretations of 4599:The remainder of this discussion has been moved to 4132:Sounds good to me :) Thanks for your understanding 3364:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Shaun Gittens

5100:(rv, more to the point, WP:RS) 12:45, 1 March 2008 988:related article. If you wish you can join the new 6053:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 5885: 3529:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 1946:]. to ask editors to comment on an AfD of one of 1011:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Jersey Devil 890:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Jersey Devil 2623:Thanks for supplying diffs for your statement. 1933:I know how strongly you feel about spamming or 1821:; I wouldn't bet too much Wiktionary wants it. 1361:Humor?!? You consider that Website is funny?!? 909:http://www.offshoringmanagement.com/theBook.htm 869:You don't have to, of course, but I noticed on 5834:15-25 seconds after the collapses started and 5179:Oops, thanks! I was actually trying to revert 4680:appears to have won major awards; and anyway, 3797:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Blocking policy/archive 2 1941:. He has been leaving messages on talk pages 1100:as a candidate for a Knowledge (XXG) article? 334:Your bot did the opposite of what was intended 110:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — 4091:Are you a model of how admins should behave? 3920:don't agree with it is strongly frowned upon 3866:Or, of course, I may have misread the dif! 2784:up for AfD. In future, please consider using 2681:The article is patent nonsense, isn't it?? -- 8: 6134:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 4366:Please let's continue this on the talk page 4273:other than be aware and be ready to revert. 3607:Milena Roucka & Tori (Victoria Crawford) 3584:911 Conspiracy Theories/Alternative Theories 3147:http://www.uccs.edu/~asoifer/books/book2.htm 2069:He is a sockpuppet and is out to make apoint 31:. Weregerbil has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 6129:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 5785:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/VSTEP 5217:(speech has the power to bind the absolute) 5133:(speech has the power to bind the absolute) 3486:, an automated bot account operated by the 3376:Removal of part of flight 175 flash article 2845:an even more hostile editing enviorment. -- 1415:article you should express your opinion on 4551:Oh, does it read too much like an advert? 3405: 2519:warnings to people for each others' edits. 1240:? I have seen other such links elsewhere. 764:By the way, what is your native language? 98:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 4881: 3242:tag, request administrator assistance at 2960: 2916:http://en.wikipedia.org/Armenian_genocide 1649:For your good-natured, humourous answers 1591:Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Cyde2 1584:Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Cyde2 1438:Apparently, this is supposed to refer to 1411:Weregerbil, as a long time editor on the 1214:enter my vote. Thankyou ^_^ Waikiki!!! -- 406:, who wrote a lot on Statistics. Cheers, 6009:Now you can also see a proposal for the 3492:contact the Mediation Committee directly 3173:My apologies for my incorrect assumption 1706:Hey man, I just wrote this back to you: 573:. (I have done a lot of housekeeping at 5993:programming language and its platform. 4276:Contrary to what he probably supposes, 3948:for removing material in conflict with 2122:not to do this sort of thing yesterday 1667:Oooh, thank you! It's purty, I love it! 798:Comments about Schrödinger's cat edits. 208:» kindly refrain from deleting section 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 4039:a little closer. Calling a conclusion 3775:that can only be a good thing. Thanks 3762:Mark Bunn (footballer) and Scott Cross 3197:reverting vandalism on Knowledge (XXG) 2503:advertising and soliciting meatpuppets 1632: 719:Thanks for looking after the article. 340:restored vandalism over a good version 315:Knowledge (XXG):Dealing with vandalism 296:Knowledge (XXG):Dealing with vandalism 174:» kindly refrain from vandalising the 147:are useful, and unless we're ruthless 139:This is in regards to your comment at 5646:don't you have anything better to do! 5644:You have nominated 3 articles of me, 5232:Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate 5226:Looking at the google search you use 5203:Hi, you might want to consider using 4263:I don't think this will come to much, 4168:How did you come to the conclusion a 3771:players, and looking at the relevant 2510:I did awhile back and again recently. 7: 4769:Thank you for that information. :-) 4589:, who first put the stuff up, does. 2538:instigator. Hard to credit with GF. 2075:yet you were sharp enough to notice 1092:Significance of Joanna Sturm article 5941:has been nominated for deletion by 5842:15-25 after the collapses started. 5815:As far as I can tell, you inserted 5562:Thanks for reading to this point. 4442:bundle of sticks of a specific size 2702:whole notion of Knowledge Sharing. 2495:Thank you for your friendly advice. 63:The Five Pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 5111:conspiracy theorists have emerged; 4751:Hi, is it possible to find out if 4280:where he makes that suggestion is 3909:rm joke sourced by a joke web page 3319:, I recently made a suggestion in 2756:Knowledge (XXG) Neutrality Project 1672:You deserve it, gave me a chuckle! 54:to Knowledge (XXG). Thank you for 14: 6079:review the candidates' statements 5108:conspiracy theories have emerged; 5051:http://www.moviecynics.com/blog/4 4914: 4892:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 4875:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 4591:The way, the truth, and the light 4035:I think someone may need to read 3539:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 3069:"The Daily Show: Satire Restyled" 3020:I removed your {{notability}} on 2971:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 1398:of talk on this article? Thanks. 5918: 4915:On the term 'conspiracy theory'. 4882: 4845:) - Blocked as sockpuppets. See 3409: 2961: 2642: 1633: 854: 19: 4948:) 11:26, August 20, 2007 (UTC). 2817:And no, not AGF is not a PA. -- 2148:included in that kind of media. 871:User:Dragons flight/AFD summary 596:on the Japanese Knowledge (XXG) 370:Category:User_warning_templates 6085:. For the Election committee, 6055:Arbitration Committee election 6046:ArbCom elections are now open! 5959:guideline on multiple messages 5876:13:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 5047:http://www.neverhaveiever.com/ 5039:Knowledge (XXG):Drinking Games 4990:05:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4714:I completely forgot to notify 3841:Google and Youtube video links 3720:A point about personal attacks 3282:You have nothing better to do. 3115:11:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 3085:15:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 3048:19:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 3014:12:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 3003:12:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 2982:09:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 1615:dispute (display of an image). 1473:Bleeding Was Only HALF the Job 1193:into the Second thought AfD.-- 902:Why was the following removed? 723:appears to be a sockpuppet of 558:Removing completed entries at 1: 6095:13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 5283:? I'd really appreciate it. 5086:11:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 5063:16:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 5012:00:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 4271:not do anything in particular 4155:18:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 3786:Knowledge (XXG) Zionist Cabal 3715:11:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3699:14:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 3677:14:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 3659:08:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 3627:22:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 3602:09:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 3579:10:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 3371:14:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC) 3353:10:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC) 3329:20:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 3277:15:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 3251:15:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 3183:12:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3180:A green Kiwi in learning mode 3168:06:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2948:08:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2229:I noted you did something to 1760:). Then I saw an article for 1653:, I award you this barnstar! 1289:contains the following text: 817:22:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 808:21:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 793:15:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 788:, if you'd like to comment. 769:15:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 750:15:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 732:06:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 708:13:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 688:14:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 679:06:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 669:03:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 656:02:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 647:02:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 638:Thankyou (userpage vandalism) 633:00:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 229:16:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 130:13:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 6115:20:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC) 6038:04:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 5913:08:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 5582:Loughborough Grammer School! 5033:10:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC) 5018:Ichthus Christian Fellowship 4869:16:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 4718:about the report I filed at 4509:article on Kinetic Awareness 4139:11:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 4127:10:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 4096:09:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 4058:09:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 4015:09:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 3989:19:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 3961:11:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 3940:10:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 3927:10:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 3891:12:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 3880:12:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 3871:12:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 3861:12:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 3835:10:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 3826:I responded on my talk page. 3817:19:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3808:15:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3780:12:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 3561:03:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 3501: 3444:For the Mediation Committee, 3396:19:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 3386:18:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 3158:Jason Lee (Tennis Superstar) 3153:11:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 2429:You might want to put it on 2194:Wow. From 15 May to 10 July. 1904:Hi, I noticed your edits to 1063:Some great resource though! 603:01:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 585:04:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 553:01:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 526:14:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 507:06:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 490:06:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 476:06:26, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 443:00:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 429:04:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 411:11:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 391:06:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 377:11:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 351:03:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 328:13:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 199:12:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 83:How to write a great article 33:since since October 19, 2009 6081:and submit your choices on 5977:WikiProject Java and Portal 5359:Okay, thanks for the reply. 5205:Knowledge (XXG):Speedy keep 4975:15:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4907:14:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3956:? That's kind of worrying. 3757:08:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 3535:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 3340:The Wheel of Buddhist Terms 3334:The Wheel of Buddhist Terms 3136:15:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 2892:17:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 2873:17:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 2850:14:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 2836:13:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 2822:13:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 2799:15:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2770:14:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2760:08:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2739:16:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 2722:08:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 2417:Antelope In Search Of Truth 2236:Rule based trading is just 924:13:15, 14 March 2006 (PST) 308:22:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 194:and make up your own mind. 161:12:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 115:12:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 6150: 6087:MediaWiki message delivery 5972:08:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 5629:18:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5606:15:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 5248:09:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 5230:: let's remove the phrase 5221:00:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 4562:16:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4547:16:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4504:17:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 4490:13:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 4474:22:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 4459:22:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 4449:07:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 4405:21:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 4375:10:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 4359:10:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 4332:13:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 4318:13:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 4292:13:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 4251:12:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 4220:11:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 3525:" template to the article 3482:This message delivered by 3315:Regarding recent edits to 2686:10:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2674:10:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 2628:01:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 2619:22:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2601:You're mentioned. It's on 2176:23:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1643:The Barnstar of Good Humor 1589:Have you read my reply on 1269:10:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 1247:19:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1219:01:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1198:16:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1176:10:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1157:08:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1032:09:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 1018:22:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 997:22:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 969:00:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 940:21:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 897:22:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 879:22:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 797: 727:, if it comes to banning. 210:Different Security systems 5939:Template:911ct supporters 5933:Template:911ct supporters 5916: 5888: 5855:20:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 5806:04:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5787:if you're interested. --/ 5296:03:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 5199:9/11 advance knowledge... 5193:18:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 5174:22:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 5152:12:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 5137:12:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 4888: 4798:21:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4774:18:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4764:02:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 4742:08:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 4580:List of uniform polyhedra 4523:23:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 4338:Edit of MDS International 4194:09:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 4180:11:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 3358:Shaun Gittens, Jack Steer 3321:Talk:State Farm Insurance 3022:Pentagram (design studio) 2967: 2610:17:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2588:20:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2550:22:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2487:18:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2461:17:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2447:13:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2438:13:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2420:20:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 2392:13:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 2369:20:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2303:20:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2286:20:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2270:19:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2260:19:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2246:13:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2220:21:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 2202:15:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 1973:19:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1957:19:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1924:19:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1895:13:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 1878:14:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1826:13:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1797:12:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1739:17:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1727:09:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1714:09:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1701:15:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1691:Thunder Bay Norther Hawks 1686:19:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 1658:19:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1639: 1620:20:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1598:01:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 1570:20:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 1510:18:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 1189:You might want to bundle 1119:Alice Roosevelt Longworth 1047:16:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) 1009:Please comment on my rfc 984:, I noticed you edited a 888:Please comment on my rfc 860:02:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC) 5891:passed today at 150/48/6 5769:18:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 5738:11:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 5682: 5572:11:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 5342: 5302:Here is another instance 5243: 5188: 5147: 5081: 4997:Knowledge (XXG):Coatrack 4704:12:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 4693:11:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 4666:11:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 4594:04:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 3803:that applies, though. -- 3551:speedy deletion criteria 3244:Request for Intervention 2580:archived his talk page: 2383:Your supernatural powers 2159:21:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 2129:11:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2106:06:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2088:09:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2077:Only one sockpuppet here 2047:09:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2021:08:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 1999:08:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 1754:List of Internet slang#L 1559:14:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1543:14:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1528:14:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1493:14:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1480:14:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1454:15:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 1424:00:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC) 1403:13:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 1375:14:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 1366:14:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 1357:14:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 1343:13:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 1322:13:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 1308:13:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1236:pages, considered to be 992:. Thanks for your time. 590:Re: rv edit by Schildt.a 448:Why was my link removed? 106:, add a question to the 6021:support this initiative 5687:17:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5675:WP:vanispamcruftisement 5667:17:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5347:20:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 5324:15:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 5275:Would you mind looking 4953:Afghanistan War dispute 4672:Hi! Knowledge (XXG) is 4601:Talk:Uniform polyhedron 3666:Criticisms of Star Trek 2898:Whatchagonnadooabootit? 2403:Mariano Ristori Morakis 2140:Bruce Willis is a robot 2134:Bruce Willis is a robot 1417:this "islamophobia" CfD 1408:Islamophobia category? 662:eliminative materialism 6016: 5254:Your opinion please... 5104:We have four options: 4368:Talk:MDS International 2181:German organized crime 1802:(copied from my place) 1611:his engagement in the 1262:social networking spam 1256:I saw that you marked 1252:Social networking spam 1166:Please go back to the 1052:oxygen bars and others 933:This is not productive 538:As for your comments: 366:User talk:200.19.48.34 6059:Arbitration Committee 5983: 5693:Schlemiel the painter 5210:regards,  4936:comment was added by 4567:Jonathan Bowers stuff 4387:Jean-Claude Ducasse 4349:comment was added by 4237:comment was added by 3846:link to such videos. 3769:Northampton Town F.C. 3617:comment was added by 3547:Articles for Deletion 3420:Request for Mediation 3402:Request for Mediation 2663:The Cult of Briefsism 2190:Feet/birds hamburgers 2118:I believe you warned 1144:research, editors. 1065:Category:Sexual slang 5114:claims have emerged; 3907:Regarding your edit 3777:One Night In Hackney 3317:State Farm Insurance 3311:State Farm Insurance 3082:Oskar Mayer Nguyener 3045:Oskar Mayer Nguyener 1762:LOL (Internet slang) 1467:Xtreme Pro Wrestling 1277:Invisible university 1037:Canadian Forces Link 865:Debold changed votes 6063:arbitration process 5277:at the google-cache 5234:from the equation: 4716:User:Complete Truth 4638:Warm regards, Mark 4520:Thomas Körtvélyessy 3543:Talk:Philanthropist 3488:Mediation Committee 2977:For your hard work 2782:Legacy of Tirlannon 2776:Legacy of Tirlannon 2407:Cristian Mac Entyre 1939:User:Robertsteadman 1396:this bottom section 1380:True crime articles 1332:Karl Meiers changes 990:Hip Hop Wikiproject 928:Inline image on AfD 714:Montgomery Farquhar 264:Diff showing links. 6075:arbitration policy 6030:A l a i n R 3 4 5 5931:TfD nomination of 5928: 5923: 5074:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 4919:Hello Weregerbil, 4682:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 3674:Rumpelstiltskin223 3495: 3096:"9/11 Researchers" 3033:The New York Times 2597:blocked for 3 days 2238:Technical analysis 2231:Rule Based Trading 2225:Rule based trading 915:Your linkspam edit 721:User:GrahamDouglas 693:James and abortion 397:Stationary process 88:Naming conventions 68:How to edit a page 56:your contributions 6013:(temp location).' 5927: 5926: 5917: 5884: 5840:remaining stading 5832:beginning to fall 5802: 5794: 5771: 5755:comment added by 5740: 5724:comment added by 5669: 5653:comment added by 5608: 5592:comment added by 5219: 5135: 5010: 4949: 4912: 4911: 4759:are sockpuppets? 4740: 4668: 4659: 4645:comment added by 4436: 4422:comment added by 4362: 4254: 4218: 4170:Victoria's Secret 4043:is to Comment on 3767:new articles for 3630: 3531:proposed deletion 3500: 3499: 3496: 3481: 3459: 3351: 3307: 3293:comment added by 2987: 2986: 2939: 2925:comment added by 2831:get nom AGAIN. -- 2649:Morton Devonshire 2572: 2558:comment added by 2208:Kick The Can Crew 1756:(one old version 1674:EvocativeIntrigue 1663: 1662: 1655:EvocativeIntrigue 1244:Derek R Bullamore 1088: 1074:comment added by 1002: 1001: 780:When you prodded 758:Conspiracy theory 422:Primitive Baptist 416:Primitive Baptist 291: 277:comment added by 39: 38: 6141: 6107:Lima Bean Farmer 6035: 6034: 5987:WikiProject Java 5970: 5968: 5957:, following the 5922: 5909: 5903: 5897: 5886: 5798: 5792: 5750: 5719: 5718:Cheers. Keith. 5648: 5612:Ragabonds issues 5587: 5381: 5375: 5313: 5307: 5271: 5265: 5211: 5127: 5006: 4963:reliable sources 4938:Eustace Plimsoll 4931: 4903: 4886: 4879: 4878: 4866: 4860: 4855: 4793: 4753:User:Rdpaperclip 4738: 4732: 4728: 4726: 4660: 4658: 4639: 4480:Superdeterminism 4435: 4416: 4344: 4232: 4217: 4214: 4208: 3799:. I don't see a 3705:Peppermint Grove 3644:reliable sources 3636:reliable sources 3612: 3524: 3518: 3515:I've added the " 3480: 3463: 3461: 3457: 3452: 3413: 3406: 3362:Both covered in 3347: 3306: 3287: 3273: 3272::) Dlohcierekim 3241: 3233: 3225: 3217: 3209: 2965: 2958: 2957: 2938: 2919: 2888: 2882: 2869: 2863: 2793: 2787: 2683:TheM62Manchester 2671:TheM62Manchester 2646: 2578:User_talk:Jgwlaw 2571: 2552: 2217: 1875: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1637: 1630: 1629: 1451: 1234:The Blow Monkeys 1087: 1068: 978: 858: 725:User:Beucephalia 498:Here is a quote: 360:Hi, you've used 290: 271: 78:Picture tutorial 73:Editing tutorial 23: 16: 6149: 6148: 6144: 6143: 6142: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6119: 6118: 6102: 6083:the voting page 6049: 6027: 6026: 5979: 5964: 5962: 5936: 5907: 5901: 5895: 5883: 5862: 5813: 5803: 5777: 5746: 5695: 5642: 5614: 5584: 5379: 5373: 5311: 5305: 5269: 5263: 5262:? In a recent 5256: 5201: 5162: 5094: 5042: 5021: 5000: 4982: 4955: 4932:—The preceding 4917: 4901: 4877: 4864: 4858: 4851: 4791: 4749: 4736: 4730: 4724: 4712: 4640: 4610: 4587:User:Salix alba 4569: 4530: 4511: 4497: 4482: 4417: 4413: 4345:—The preceding 4340: 4299: 4297:Removal of QA·C 4260: 4233:—The preceding 4229: 4212: 4209: 4202: 4166: 4150:the revert. // 4147: 4145:Java Benchmarks 4114: 3905: 3843: 3824: 3789: 3764: 3722: 3707: 3669: 3613:—The preceding 3609: 3586: 3571: 3522: 3516: 3513: 3506: 3455: 3448: 3446: 3404: 3378: 3360: 3336: 3313: 3288: 3284: 3271: 3261: 3235: 3227: 3219: 3211: 3203: 3193: 3175: 3165:Lee Enterprizes 3160: 3143: 3124: 3107:Thanks again. 3098: 3025: 2992: 2956: 2920: 2900: 2886: 2880: 2867: 2861: 2857: 2806: 2791: 2785: 2778: 2748: 2732: 2715: 2696: 2667: 2635: 2599: 2553: 2497: 2468: 2454: 2427: 2399: 2385: 2253: 2227: 2215: 2211: 2192: 2183: 2136: 2116: 2095: 1931: 1902: 1888: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1844:+LMTO +Laughing 1776: 1773: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1746: 1693: 1684: 1628: 1626:Humour Barnstar 1587: 1469: 1461: 1447: 1436: 1392: 1382: 1350: 1329: 1315: 1305:SpecOp Macavity 1279: 1254: 1226: 1211: 1191:Purlieu (album) 1186: 1094: 1076:Fluidcreativity 1069: 1054: 1039: 1025: 1007: 976: 950: 930: 917: 904: 886: 867: 853: 842:Muslim athletes 826: 814:David R. Ingham 805:David R. Ingham 800: 782:Captain Useless 778: 741:Hi Weregerbil, 739: 717: 695: 640: 617: 610: 592: 563: 533: 517: 450: 436: 418: 400: 384: 358: 336: 272: 181:John Adams for 168: 137: 122: 93:Manual of Style 44: 12: 11: 5: 6147: 6145: 6137: 6136: 6131: 6121: 6120: 6101: 6098: 6052: 6048: 6043: 6041: 6040: 6033: 6015: 6014: 6007: 6004: 6001: 5998: 5978: 5975: 5961:.) Regards — 5955:Template:911ct 5947:Template:911ct 5935: 5929: 5925: 5924: 5915: 5882: 5879: 5861: 5858: 5847:Thomas Basboll 5812: 5809: 5797: 5776: 5773: 5745: 5742: 5694: 5691: 5690: 5689: 5641: 5638: 5636: 5633: 5613: 5610: 5594:Mickey bliss16 5583: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5499: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5478:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5349: 5327: 5326: 5255: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5200: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5161: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5123: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5112: 5109: 5102: 5101: 5093: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5041: 5036: 5020: 5015: 4999: 4993: 4981: 4978: 4954: 4951: 4916: 4913: 4910: 4909: 4895: 4894: 4889: 4887: 4876: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4748: 4745: 4711: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4696: 4695: 4647:Mark.j.preston 4609: 4606: 4568: 4565: 4529: 4526: 4510: 4507: 4496: 4495:drinking games 4493: 4481: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4452: 4451: 4412: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4396:What is this? 4393: 4390: 4378: 4377: 4339: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4298: 4295: 4269:I suggest you 4259: 4256: 4228: 4226:Scampi diSanti 4223: 4201: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4165: 4160: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4113: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4089: 4083: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4004: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3964: 3963: 3904: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3842: 3839: 3838: 3823: 3820: 3788: 3783: 3763: 3760: 3721: 3718: 3712:Orderinchaos78 3706: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3668: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3608: 3605: 3585: 3582: 3570: 3564: 3527:Philanthropist 3512: 3510:Philanthropist 3507: 3498: 3497: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3416: 3414: 3403: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3377: 3374: 3359: 3356: 3335: 3332: 3312: 3309: 3295:220.244.237.37 3283: 3280: 3260: 3254: 3201: 3200: 3195:Thank you for 3192: 3189: 3187: 3174: 3171: 3159: 3156: 3142: 3139: 3123: 3118: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3078: 3075: 3072: 3057:The Daily Show 3024: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2966: 2955: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2856: 2853: 2839: 2838: 2805: 2802: 2777: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2747: 2742: 2731: 2728: 2726: 2714: 2711: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2666: 2660: 2658: 2634: 2631: 2598: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2496: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2467: 2464: 2453: 2450: 2426: 2423: 2398: 2395: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2279: 2273: 2272: 2252: 2249: 2226: 2223: 2210: 2205: 2191: 2188: 2182: 2179: 2162: 2161: 2152: 2149: 2135: 2132: 2126:Robertsteadman 2115: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2103:Robertsteadman 2094: 2091: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1980: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1970:Robertsteadman 1930: 1927: 1901: 1898: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1812: 1811: 1745: 1742: 1736:Robertsteadman 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1717: 1716: 1692: 1689: 1676: 1670: 1669: 1661: 1660: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1638: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1586: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1468: 1465: 1460: 1457: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1378: 1349: 1346: 1328: 1325: 1314: 1311: 1287:Amazon listing 1278: 1275: 1273: 1253: 1250: 1225: 1222: 1210: 1205: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1185: 1182:Second thought 1179: 1164: 1163: 1150: 1149: 1138: 1137: 1128:Michael Teague 1115: 1114: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1093: 1090: 1053: 1050: 1038: 1035: 1024: 1023:Your AfD votes 1021: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 975: 972: 949: 943: 929: 926: 916: 913: 903: 900: 885: 882: 866: 863: 849: 837: 836: 833: 825: 820: 799: 796: 777: 772: 762: 761: 738: 735: 716: 711: 694: 691: 685:Colin Kimbrell 672: 639: 636: 616: 611: 609: 606: 591: 588: 562: 556: 547: 546: 543: 532: 529: 516: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 499: 493: 492: 482: 449: 446: 435: 432: 417: 414: 399: 394: 383: 380: 357: 354: 335: 332: 331: 330: 279:198.166.48.219 267: 266: 252:198.166.48.219 226:198.166.48.219 202: 201: 167: 164: 145:external links 136: 133: 121: 118: 96: 95: 90: 85: 80: 75: 70: 65: 43: 40: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6146: 6135: 6132: 6130: 6127: 6126: 6124: 6117: 6116: 6112: 6108: 6099: 6097: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6080: 6076: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6056: 6047: 6044: 6042: 6039: 6036: 6032: 6031: 6023: 6022: 6012: 6008: 6005: 6002: 5999: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5992: 5988: 5982: 5976: 5974: 5973: 5969: 5967: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5944: 5943:Ice Cold Beer 5940: 5934: 5930: 5921: 5914: 5910: 5904: 5898: 5892: 5887: 5880: 5878: 5877: 5874: 5871: 5867: 5859: 5857: 5856: 5852: 5848: 5843: 5841: 5837: 5833: 5828: 5825: 5822: 5819: 5817: 5810: 5808: 5807: 5801: 5795: 5791: 5786: 5782: 5774: 5772: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5743: 5741: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5716: 5712: 5710: 5705: 5702: 5698: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5647: 5639: 5637: 5634: 5631: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5621:67.169.126.27 5618: 5611: 5609: 5607: 5603: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5581: 5573: 5569: 5565: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5505: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5479: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5447: 5446: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5442: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5402: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5378: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5348: 5344: 5340: 5336: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5310: 5303: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5284: 5282: 5278: 5273: 5268: 5261: 5253: 5249: 5245: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5208: 5206: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5160: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5122: 5116: 5113: 5110: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5099: 5096: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5048: 5040: 5037: 5035: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5019: 5016: 5014: 5013: 5009: 5005: 4998: 4994: 4992: 4991: 4988: 4979: 4977: 4976: 4973: 4972:ForbiddenWord 4969: 4964: 4960: 4959:its talk page 4952: 4950: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4927: 4923: 4920: 4908: 4905: 4904: 4897: 4896: 4893: 4890: 4885: 4880: 4874: 4870: 4867: 4861: 4856: 4854: 4848: 4844: 4841: 4838: 4835: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4821: 4818: 4815: 4812: 4808: 4805: 4804: 4799: 4796: 4794: 4788: 4784: 4781: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4772: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4762: 4758: 4754: 4746: 4744: 4743: 4739: 4737:Contributions 4733: 4727: 4721: 4717: 4709: 4705: 4702: 4698: 4697: 4694: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4678:Cute Overload 4676:a link farm. 4675: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4667: 4664: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4636: 4633: 4630: 4626: 4624: 4619: 4616: 4613: 4607: 4605: 4604: 4602: 4596: 4595: 4592: 4588: 4583: 4581: 4576: 4574: 4566: 4564: 4563: 4560: 4559:Mikedelaney16 4555: 4552: 4549: 4548: 4545: 4544:Mikedelaney16 4540: 4536: 4533: 4527: 4525: 4524: 4521: 4515: 4508: 4506: 4505: 4502: 4494: 4492: 4491: 4488: 4479: 4475: 4472: 4468: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4457: 4456:RogerMoore007 4450: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4424:RogerMoore007 4421: 4410: 4406: 4403: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4394: 4391: 4388: 4385: 4384:Best Regards 4382: 4376: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4351:64.134.109.95 4348: 4337: 4333: 4330: 4326: 4323:Continued in 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4316: 4312: 4309: 4305: 4304: 4296: 4294: 4293: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4274: 4272: 4267: 4264: 4257: 4255: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4227: 4224: 4222: 4221: 4215: 4207: 4199: 4195: 4192: 4189: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4178: 4175: 4171: 4164: 4161: 4159: 4158: 4156: 4153: 4144: 4140: 4137: 4136: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4125: 4124: 4119: 4111: 4097: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4084: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4059: 4056: 4055: 4050: 4047:, not on the 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4016: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3990: 3987: 3986: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3972: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3938: 3934: 3929: 3928: 3925: 3924: 3919: 3914: 3910: 3902: 3892: 3889: 3888:Fiddle Faddle 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3869: 3868:Fiddle Faddle 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3859: 3858:Fiddle Faddle 3854: 3851: 3847: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3833: 3829: 3821: 3819: 3818: 3815: 3810: 3809: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3787: 3784: 3782: 3781: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3761: 3759: 3758: 3755: 3751: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3719: 3717: 3716: 3713: 3704: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3675: 3667: 3664: 3660: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3619:69.149.42.163 3616: 3606: 3604: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3583: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3569: 3566:Your edit to 3565: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3521: 3511: 3508: 3504: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3462: 3453: 3451: 3445: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3415: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3401: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3384: 3375: 3373: 3372: 3369: 3365: 3357: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3341: 3333: 3331: 3330: 3327: 3322: 3318: 3310: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3281: 3279: 3278: 3275: 3274: 3266: 3258: 3255: 3253: 3252: 3249: 3245: 3239: 3231: 3223: 3215: 3207: 3198: 3190: 3188: 3185: 3184: 3181: 3172: 3170: 3169: 3166: 3157: 3155: 3154: 3151: 3148: 3140: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3133:Fiddle Faddle 3128: 3122: 3119: 3117: 3116: 3113: 3108: 3105: 3101: 3095: 3093: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3076: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3059: 3058: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3042: 3040: 3039:Business Week 3036: 3034: 3030: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3012: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3001: 2997: 2989: 2983: 2980: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2964: 2959: 2953: 2949: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2883: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2864: 2854: 2852: 2851: 2848: 2844: 2837: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2815: 2812: 2803: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2790: 2783: 2775: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2746: 2745:Acrylic steel 2743: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2693: 2687: 2684: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2672: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2632: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2621: 2620: 2617: 2612: 2611: 2608: 2604: 2596: 2593: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2551: 2548: 2544: 2539: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2518: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2504: 2494: 2488: 2485: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2465: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2452:Edit question 2451: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2440: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2424: 2422: 2421: 2418: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2396: 2394: 2393: 2390: 2382: 2370: 2367: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2287: 2284: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2250: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2239: 2234: 2232: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2218: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2189: 2187: 2180: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2160: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2133: 2131: 2130: 2127: 2123: 2121: 2113: 2107: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2048: 2045: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2022: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2000: 1997: 1992: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1955: 1951: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1942: 1940: 1936: 1928: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1899: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1886:GA discussion 1885: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1845: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1817: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1743: 1741: 1740: 1737: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1659: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1636: 1631: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1581: 1571: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1544: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1511: 1508: 1507:TruthCrusader 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1494: 1491: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1478: 1474: 1466: 1464: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1431: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1379: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1347: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1326: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1288: 1284: 1283:Peak Learning 1276: 1274: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1251: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230:Prefab Sprout 1223: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1169: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1123: 1120: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1099: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1022: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1004: 998: 995: 991: 987: 983: 980: 979: 973: 971: 970: 967: 966:Spring Rubber 962: 959: 954: 948: 944: 942: 941: 938: 935:. Thank you. 934: 927: 925: 923: 914: 912: 910: 901: 899: 898: 895: 891: 883: 881: 880: 877: 872: 864: 862: 861: 857: 852: 847: 843: 834: 831: 830: 829: 824: 821: 819: 818: 815: 810: 809: 806: 795: 794: 791: 787: 783: 776: 773: 771: 770: 767: 759: 754: 753: 752: 751: 748: 742: 736: 734: 733: 730: 726: 722: 715: 712: 710: 709: 706: 705: 701: 692: 690: 689: 686: 681: 680: 677: 671: 670: 667: 663: 658: 657: 654: 649: 648: 645: 637: 635: 634: 630: 626: 622: 615: 614:Rickia Zovant 612: 607: 605: 604: 601: 597: 589: 587: 586: 583: 580: 576: 572: 568: 561: 557: 555: 554: 551: 544: 541: 540: 539: 536: 530: 528: 527: 524: 520: 514: 508: 505: 500: 497: 496: 495: 494: 491: 488: 483: 480: 479: 478: 477: 474: 470: 467: 463: 459: 456: 453: 447: 445: 444: 441: 433: 431: 430: 427: 423: 415: 413: 412: 409: 405: 404:Michael Hardy 398: 395: 393: 392: 389: 381: 379: 378: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362:Template:Spam 356:Template:Spam 355: 353: 352: 349: 345: 341: 333: 329: 325: 321: 316: 312: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 232: 231: 230: 227: 223: 219: 214: 211: 207: 200: 197: 193: 192:Laval, Quebec 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 179: 177: 173: 165: 163: 162: 159: 155: 150: 146: 142: 134: 132: 131: 128: 119: 117: 116: 113: 109: 105: 101: 94: 91: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 60: 59: 57: 53: 49: 41: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 6103: 6050: 6029: 6028: 6019: 6017: 5990: 5984: 5980: 5965: 5937: 5863: 5844: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5829: 5826: 5823: 5820: 5814: 5789: 5778: 5757:YerCaughtSon 5747: 5744:Gregory Webb 5717: 5713: 5706: 5703: 5699: 5697:Weregerbil, 5696: 5645: 5643: 5635: 5632: 5619: 5615: 5585: 5285: 5274: 5257: 5231: 5209: 5202: 5163: 5126: 5124: 5120: 5103: 5043: 5022: 5001: 4983: 4968:my talk page 4956: 4928: 4924: 4921: 4918: 4900: 4891: 4852: 4847:SSP Achidiac 4839: 4833: 4819: 4813: 4787:60.241.91.14 4757:User:T3Smile 4750: 4713: 4637: 4634: 4631: 4627: 4620: 4617: 4614: 4612:Weregerbil: 4611: 4598: 4597: 4584: 4577: 4570: 4556: 4553: 4550: 4541: 4537: 4534: 4532:Weregerbil, 4531: 4516: 4512: 4498: 4483: 4466: 4453: 4414: 4395: 4392: 4389: 4386: 4383: 4379: 4341: 4313: 4310: 4306: 4300: 4281: 4275: 4270: 4268: 4262: 4261: 4230: 4203: 4167: 4163:Sally Nguyen 4148: 4133: 4121: 4115: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 3983: 3970: 3930: 3921: 3917: 3913:User:MikeURL 3908: 3906: 3855: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3825: 3811: 3790: 3765: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3727: 3726: 3723: 3708: 3670: 3646:. Also, see 3610: 3587: 3572: 3514: 3502: 3484:MediationBot 3449: 3443: 3379: 3361: 3338:Sorry about 3337: 3314: 3285: 3269: 3262: 3257:Randy birner 3194: 3186: 3176: 3161: 3144: 3129: 3125: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3091: 3065:BusinessWeek 3064: 3055: 3026: 2993: 2970: 2901: 2858: 2842: 2840: 2816: 2810: 2807: 2779: 2749: 2733: 2725: 2716: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2694:John Finkell 2668: 2657: 2653: 2648: 2636: 2622: 2613: 2600: 2540: 2536: 2523: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2509: 2501:Please read 2500: 2499: 2498: 2473: 2469: 2455: 2441: 2428: 2425:Your comment 2414: 2400: 2386: 2349: 2344: 2339: 2334: 2329: 2254: 2235: 2228: 2212: 2193: 2184: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2137: 2117: 2093:Your message 2080: 2072: 2068: 2066: 2061: 2059: 1990: 1979: 1947: 1934: 1932: 1914:Prostitution 1906:Gail McKenna 1903: 1900:Gail McKenna 1889: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1856: 1813: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1775: 1747: 1733: 1694: 1671: 1666: 1642: 1612: 1609:I summerized 1588: 1470: 1462: 1459:True Crime 3 1448: 1437: 1413:islamophobia 1393: 1389:Islamophobia 1383: 1369: 1360: 1351: 1336:Islamophobia 1330: 1316: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1282: 1280: 1272: 1255: 1242: 1227: 1212: 1202: 1168:Joanna Sturm 1165: 1151: 1142: 1139: 1124: 1116: 1098:Joanna Sturm 1095: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1040: 1026: 1015:Jersey Devil 1008: 981: 963: 957: 955: 951: 931: 918: 905: 894:Jersey Devil 887: 868: 838: 827: 811: 801: 779: 763: 743: 740: 718: 703: 696: 682: 676:210.54.12.72 673: 666:Kripkenstein 659: 650: 641: 618: 595: 593: 571:edit summary 566: 564: 548: 537: 534: 521: 518: 471: 468: 464: 460: 457: 454: 451: 437: 419: 408:J heisenberg 401: 385: 382:Link spammer 359: 337: 293: 268: 222:welcome page 215: 209: 205: 203: 184:Rick Blatter 183: 180: 175: 171: 169: 138: 123: 108:village pump 97: 47: 45: 32: 26: 6100:Not missing 6011:Java Portal 5866:WP:COATRACK 5751:—Preceding 5720:—Preceding 5649:—Preceding 5588:—Preceding 5281:WP:COATRACK 5260:WP:COATRACK 5159:Portmarnock 4980:Sulphur pdf 4902:Wikidudeman 4827:Rdpaperclip 4747:Sockpuppets 4641:—Preceding 4487:Marasmusine 4467:interesting 4418:—Preceding 4049:contributor 3832:Friendship6 3828:Friendship6 3814:Friendship6 3750:my own site 3289:—Preceding 3259:sppeedy tag 3238:subst:test4 3230:subst:test4 3222:subst:test3 3214:subst:test2 3191:Vandal tags 3110:Cordially, 2921:—Preceding 2719:203.124.2.6 2709:Thank you. 2633:Cruft Alert 2554:—Preceding 2466:Your agenda 2401:You tagged 1994:allegation. 1750:this revert 1582:comment on 1216:ElectricEye 1070:—Preceding 1029:Green Giant 273:—Preceding 218:the sandbox 6123:Categories 6071:topic bans 5838:the cores 5679:Weregerbil 5655:Niflheim89 5535:describes. 5422:seriously. 5339:Weregerbil 5240:Weregerbil 5185:Weregerbil 5144:Weregerbil 5078:Weregerbil 4701:Weregerbil 4690:Weregerbil 4688:. Thanks! 4663:Weregerbil 4528:Lunarpedia 4471:Weregerbil 4446:Weregerbil 4402:Weregerbil 4372:Weregerbil 4329:Weregerbil 4200:Re: Thanks 4152:BankingBum 4093:Weregerbil 4012:Weregerbil 3958:Weregerbil 3937:Weregerbil 3877:Weregerbil 3754:Headshaker 3696:Weregerbil 3656:Weregerbil 3640:verifiable 3393:Davril2020 3383:DanCrowter 3265:user:srose 3206:subst:test 3011:Weregerbil 2945:Weregerbil 2585:Weregerbil 2366:Weregerbil 2300:Weregerbil 2267:Weregerbil 2243:Smallbones 1842:I googled 1823:Weregerbil 1816:Wiktionary 1354:Karl Meier 1327:Karl Meier 1113:Roosevelt. 1044:Bridesmill 945:Regarding 937:Rob Church 922:Coolmojito 876:Esquizombi 790:NickelShoe 206:Weregerbil 204:Dear Mr. « 196:Weregerbil 176:Laval page 172:Weregerbil 170:Dear Mr. « 104:help pages 100:Wikipedian 48:Weregerbil 6067:site bans 5896:rootology 5881:thank you 5870:Fut.Perf. 5811:WTC error 5775:VSTEP AfD 5286:Thanks! 5236:five hits 5098:your edit 5070:talk page 5055:Cphillips 4853:Jreferee 4783:confirmed 4325:Talk:QA·C 4315:Rdbuckley 4112:Apologies 4051:. Sheesh 3971:unblocked 3555:Sebastian 3326:Mwalimu59 3112:O Govinda 3067:article, 3063:From the 2927:Lovelight 2881:rootology 2862:rootology 2713:Helpdesk! 2389:AntonioBu 2120:Neuropean 2114:Sorry.... 2085:Neuropean 2044:Neuropean 2018:Neuropean 1996:Neuropean 1966:Neuropean 1954:Neuropean 1440:Krakozhia 1208:Nach City 1195:Isotope23 766:Bobby1011 747:Bobby1011 653:Hansnesse 600:Saintjust 320:Wknight94 300:Wknight94 166:Vandalism 158:Graibeard 112:Graibeard 5860:Coatrack 5836:parts of 5765:contribs 5753:unsigned 5734:contribs 5726:Wookie2u 5722:unsigned 5663:contribs 5651:unsigned 5640:Nevelhel 5602:contribs 5590:unsigned 5564:Geo Swan 5335:WP:BEANS 5316:Geo Swan 5288:Geo Swan 5166:Sarah777 5025:Pairadox 4946:contribs 4934:unsigned 4837:contribs 4817:contribs 4655:contribs 4643:unsigned 4623:cuteness 4432:contribs 4420:unsigned 4347:unsigned 4286:Dpbsmith 4278:the page 4247:contribs 4235:unsigned 4086:trolling 4041:childish 4008:childish 3805:jpgordon 3773:template 3694:please. 3615:unsigned 3568:Jonathan 3368:Fan-1967 3303:contribs 3291:unsigned 2979:Jeffklib 2954:Barnstar 2935:contribs 2923:unsigned 2811:articles 2780:You put 2730:Category 2625:Tyrenius 2616:Tyrenius 2607:Tyrenius 2568:contribs 2556:unsigned 2320:debates: 2173:Minitrue 1910:Rintelen 1892:Netscott 1724:DMighton 1711:DMighton 1698:DMighton 1617:Raphael1 1595:Raphael1 1433:Crocotia 1421:Netscott 1400:Netscott 1372:Raphael1 1363:Raphael1 1340:Raphael1 1313:Tom Rose 1173:SimonATL 1154:SimonATL 1084:contribs 1072:unsigned 994:Tutmosis 874:though. 644:Blnguyen 625:enochlau 608:Security 550:Sergei y 523:Sergei y 504:Sergei y 487:Sergei y 473:Sergei y 440:8bitJake 426:Rlvaughn 287:contribs 275:unsigned 260:contribs 248:contribs 240:Ice-Evil 236:Security 149:linkspam 141:Oklahoma 135:linkspam 120:IS group 6018:Please 5889:My RFA 5793:endaliv 5213:Xiutwel 5129:Xiutwel 5117:persons 5004:Rossami 4807:T3Smile 4780:T3Smile 4771:Bearian 4761:Bearian 4120:too :) 4045:content 3741:comment 3732:comment 3728:Comment 3682:Answer 3594:Snorkel 3576:Dweller 3270:Cheers, 3248:Lijnema 3150:Tosayit 3029:WP:CORP 2847:Striver 2833:Striver 2819:Striver 2736:Striver 2665:article 2527:WP:Sock 2156:Terevos 1921:Kasreyn 1748:Hi. Re 1744:LOL etc 1605:link #7 1348:Raphael 1005:2nd RFC 986:Hip Hop 52:welcome 46:Hello, 42:Welcome 6057:. The 5966:Cs32en 5304:of an 5092:claims 5008:(talk) 4825:) and 4792:Travis 4785:as IP 4720:WP:3RR 4710:Thanks 4686:WP:NPA 4289:(talk) 4037:WP:NPA 3801:WP:CSD 3745:Delete 3737:delete 3692:WP:AGF 3688:WP:NPA 3642:using 3558:(talk) 3537:" and 3450:Essjay 3345:tjstrf 2829:S9/11T 2796:Harmil 2767:Harmil 2595:Jgwlaw 2560:Gfwesq 2547:Gfwesq 2543:WP:AGF 2531:WP:AGF 2517:WP:3RR 2484:Gfwesq 2458:jawesq 2411:WP:BIO 2042:logic. 1319:Rosies 1266:Karada 1258:MySpam 1232:, and 958:Delete 729:Choess 621:WP:CSD 515:Still, 374:Shawnc 344:Jmabel 127:Ddp224 50:, and 5781:VSTEP 5215:♫☺♥♪ 5131:♫☺♥♪ 5068:Your 4987:Wayne 4778:FYI: 4725:Pablo 4239:Thkbc 4210:(aka 3954:WP:RS 3933:WP:RS 3366:. -- 3043:. -- 3000:MONGO 2990:Edits 2843:a bad 2435:Homey 2199:Habap 1682:EMAIL 1613:other 1567:JB196 1556:JB196 1540:JB196 1525:JB196 1523:know. 1490:JB196 1477:JB196 1449:juice 1444:Mango 982:Hello 846:Samir 579:Kusma 567:might 531:Well, 154:Linux 6111:talk 6091:talk 5991:Java 5851:talk 5761:talk 5730:talk 5683:talk 5659:talk 5625:talk 5598:talk 5568:talk 5343:talk 5320:talk 5292:talk 5244:talk 5228:here 5189:talk 5181:this 5170:talk 5148:talk 5082:talk 5059:talk 5049:and 5029:talk 4995:re: 4970:. -- 4942:talk 4843:logs 4831:talk 4823:logs 4811:talk 4755:and 4731:Talk 4651:talk 4428:talk 4355:talk 4243:talk 4213:Wimt 4206:Will 4135:Glen 4123:Glen 4054:Glen 3985:Glen 3952:and 3950:WP:V 3923:Glen 3684:here 3652:here 3650:and 3648:here 3623:talk 3598:Talk 3553:. — 3520:prod 3458:Talk 3349:talk 3299:talk 3037:and 2994:The 2931:talk 2789:prod 2752:CP/M 2603:AN/I 2583:. — 2564:talk 2071:and 1929:Spam 1758:here 1678:TALK 1651:here 1238:spam 1224:Spam 1080:talk 974:Note 700:AnnH 629:talk 582:(討論) 452:Hi, 388:Reyk 348:Talk 342:! - 324:talk 304:talk 283:talk 256:talk 244:talk 6051:Hi, 6024:, 5800:Δ's 5462:it. 5377:afd 5309:afd 5267:afd 4849:-- 4789:. — 4674:not 4557:-- 4542:-- 4501:Ben 4411:Hey 4282:not 4188:Mgm 4174:Mgm 4118:ANI 3918:you 3903:FSM 2914:; 2855:RfD 2804:afd 2444:Zeq 2283:Zeq 2257:Zeq 2251:3RR 1991:are 1948:his 1916:: 1184:AfD 884:RFC 434:FSM 364:on 338:It 262:). 250:); 6125:: 6113:) 6093:) 6069:, 5911:) 5905:)( 5853:) 5804:/ 5796:// 5767:) 5763:• 5736:) 5732:• 5685:) 5665:) 5661:• 5627:) 5604:) 5600:• 5570:) 5380:}} 5374:{{ 5345:) 5322:) 5312:}} 5306:{{ 5294:) 5270:}} 5264:{{ 5246:) 5191:) 5172:) 5150:) 5084:) 5061:) 5031:) 4944:• 4734:| 4657:) 4653:• 4625:. 4434:) 4430:• 4370:. 4357:) 4327:. 4249:) 4245:• 3822:hi 3690:, 3686:. 3654:. 3625:) 3600:" 3596:| 3574:-- 3523:}} 3517:{{ 3426:. 3418:A 3305:) 3301:• 3240:}} 3236:{{ 3232:}} 3228:{{ 3226:, 3224:}} 3220:{{ 3218:, 3216:}} 3212:{{ 3210:, 3208:}} 3204:{{ 3199:! 2937:) 2933:• 2910:; 2906:; 2890:) 2871:) 2792:}} 2786:{{ 2758:| 2605:. 2570:) 2566:• 2433:. 2216:PT 2081:If 1943:] 1860:il 1849::N 1779:il 1768::N 1680:| 1593:? 1419:. 1338:. 1303:-- 1086:) 1082:• 1013:-- 911:? 892:-- 848:∙ 631:) 623:. 346:| 326:) 306:) 289:) 285:• 258:| 246:| 6109:( 6089:( 5985:' 5908:T 5902:C 5899:( 5873:☼ 5849:( 5790:M 5759:( 5728:( 5681:( 5657:( 5623:( 5596:( 5566:( 5480:. 5341:( 5318:( 5290:( 5242:( 5187:( 5168:( 5146:( 5080:( 5057:( 5027:( 4940:( 4865:c 4862:/ 4859:t 4840:· 4834:· 4829:( 4820:· 4814:· 4809:( 4649:( 4603:. 4426:( 4361:. 4353:( 4253:. 4241:( 4216:) 4190:| 4176:| 3629:. 3621:( 3505:. 3494:. 3460:) 3456:( 3297:( 3071:: 2929:( 2887:T 2884:( 2868:T 2865:( 2754:| 2562:( 2545:. 2505:. 1874:: 1872:r 1868:e 1864:v 1858:S 1855:o 1853:k 1851:i 1793:: 1791:r 1787:e 1783:v 1777:S 1774:o 1772:k 1770:i 1078:( 851:C 704:♫ 627:( 322:( 318:— 302:( 281:( 254:( 242:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index